zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgf
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjih
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihg
zyxwvutsrqponmlkj
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjih
J ProIii:oo/., 3h(3). 1989. pp 265-271
.c; 19RY by the Socieiy of Pro~ozoologir~s
zyxw
zyxwvu
Life Cycle and Culturing of Phytomonas serpens (Gibbs), a
Trypanosomatid Parasite of Tomatoes
J. VITOR JANKEVICIUS,* SHIDUCA I. JANKEVICIUS,* MARTA CAMPANER,** IVETE CONCHON,** LUCIO A. MAEDA,*
MARTA M. C. TEIXEIRA,** EDNA FREYMULI,ER** and E. PLESSMANN CAMARGO**
*Deparramenro de Patologia Geral. Universidade Estadual de Londrina, 861 00, Londrina, PR, Brazil and
**Parasiiologia. Insiituto de Ciencias BiomPdicas. C'niversidade de Siio Paulo. 05508, Siio Paulo, SP, Brazil
ABSTRACT. Pure cultures of a trypanosomatid isolated from tomato fruits infected laboratory-raised tomatoes and nymphs of the
hemipteran coreid Phfhiapicta.The flagellate could be transmitted back and forth from tomatoes to insects. Light and electron microscopy
studies were done on culture. tomato and insect forms. Examination of enzymes of the ornithine-argininemetabolism revealed absence
of arginase and presence of arginine deiminase and citrulline hydrolase. Monoclonal antibodies specific for Phytomonas spp. reacted
positively with tomato and insect forms. Endonuclease digestion of the k - D N A of various Phytornonas spp. revealed a unique, distinctive
pattern for the tomato flagellate. This flagellate thus seems 10constitute a separate species ofPhytornonas which we now call Phytornonas
serpens (Gibbs).
Key words. Arginase. arginine deiminase, citrulline, ocnithine-arginine metabolism.
T
RYPANOSOMATIDS of the genus Phytoinonas are etiological agents in devastating crop epiphytotics [9] but they
also parasitize many plants without apparent pathogenicity [ 161.
Phytomonads have also been reported in fruits [ 131 and legumes
[ 17, 181. nothing being known about their pathogenicity there.
The genus Phytonzonas was created by Donovan in 1909 [ 121
to accommodate trypanosomatid parasites in plants. Nevertheless, flagellates found in plants have still sometimes thereafter
been assigned to Leptomonas or Herpetomontrs as was a parasite
of tomatoes in South Africa, called Lepromonus serpens by Gibbs
in 1957 [ 151. That flagellate, detected in the sap of tomatoes,
infected the bug Nezara viridula. Cultivation, however, was not
attempted, hence L. serpens never became available. Later, Podlipaev referred to the flagellate described by Gibbs as Phxlomonas serpens [2 I].
We here describe a flagellate from tomatoes in southern Brazil,
its culturing, life cycle, presumed insect vector and transmission
to clean tomatoes by the bite of the insect and, conversely,
infection of insects upon feeding on contaminated tomatoes.
Placement of the flagellate in the genus Phytornonas is our conclusion from the above evidence and also from data concerning
the flagellate's biochemical constitution in enzymes of the ornithine-arginine metabolism [6] and reactivity with monoclonal
antibodies specific for Phytomonas spp. [24].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Surveying of tomatoes. Fruits of Lycopersicon esrulention
have been examined for flagellates. Tomatoes were picked in
Rolandia, State of Parani. and Palmital, State of S5o Paulo, in
southeastern Brazil. Fruits, leaves and stem were sectioned at
the laboratory and their sap examined by phase microscopy.
Cultures. The sap of positive fruits or organs of infected
insects were inoculated in tubes containing 3 ml of a biphasic
medium made of 2% agar base and rabbit blood cells plus 2 rnl
of an overlay of Roitman's defined medium [ 2 3 ] containing 20
pg/nil ofampicillin. Positive cultures were cloned on blood-agar
plates. Selected clones were thereafter kept on the biphasic medium. In this report, 3 cloned strains have been studied: I from
tomatoes from Rolandia, strain 9T; I from Palmital, strain IOT;
and 1 strain from an artificially infected insect, strain 1 5 1 . When
desired, flagellates were also cultured in the liquid medium LIT
[41.
Cultures of flagellates from Euphorbia piwu and Jathropa
macranrha were kindly given to us by Dr. M. Dollet and the
isolate from E. hyssoppifolia was given by Dr. W. de Souza. These
flagellates were also cultured in biphasic medium.
Raising of insects and tomatoes. Tomato-plants were grown
from seed in the laboratory in insect-proof cages. Adults of
Phthia picla (Hemiptera, Coreidae) were collected on tomatoes
in the field and bred in the laboratory. Eggs were transferred to
cages containing tomatoes grown in the laboratory. Resulting
nymphs and adults were kept under protected conditions and
always fed on laboratory-grown tomatoes.
Light and electron microscopy. Smears fixed in methanol and
stained by Giemsa were used for light microscopy and drawings
by camera lucida. For electron microscopy (EM) studies, salivary glands and segments of the digestive tube of P. picta and
flagellates from cultures pelleted at 2,000 g for 5 min were fixed
in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4. at
4" C for 2 h. After several rinses in buffer, the preparations were
post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at 25" C and stained
overnight at 4" C in 0.5% aqueous uranyl acetate. Dehydration,
embedding, sectioning and examination of the preparations were
done as before [ 141.
Enzyme assays. Determination of activity of arginase, citrulline hydrolase and arginine deiminase in homogenates of
cultures derived from insects was done exactly as before for
flagellates from plants [6].
Monoclonal antibodies assay. Reactivity towards monoclonal antibodies was determined by indirect immunofluorescence
using as antigens flagellates recovered from artificially infected
tomatoes or from cultures in LIT medium and fixed in 1%
formaldehyde. Monoclonal antibodies were also tested against
squashes of salivary glands and digestive tubes of artificially
infected insects, dried on glass slides and fixed with formaldehyde.
Restriction endonuclease digestion of k-DNA. Preparation of
k-DNA and its digestion with restriction endonucleases were
done as described [5]. Electrophoresis of the k-DNA fragments
was performed on 2% agarose gels.
zyxwvu
RESULTS
Isolation and culturing of flagellates. Ripe fruits of Lycopersicon esculentum displaying tiny yellow spots on the surface-indicative of insect biting-stood a better chance of harboring flagellates. In some instances, up to 50% of the fruits of
the variety sherry were infected in backyard gardens in Rolandia
County. Stems and leaves of tomato plants were never found
infected.
Nymphs and adults of the coreid Phthia picta were very often
found feeding on tomatoes in backyard gardens. In some areas
all insects harbored flagellates in the digestive tube. In commercial crops, insects were rare, likewise in infected tomatoesa fact probably related to the use of insecticides.
Under light microscopy of the fruit sap, small flagellates were
265
266
zz
zyxwvutsrqpo
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwv
g
- zy
J. PROTOZOOL.,
VOL. 36, NO. 3, MAY-JUNE 1989
Q )
10
10 p m
n
11
-
15
10 prn
Fig. 1. Phytomonas serpens, strain 9T, in tomatoes and culture media: 1-10, flagellates of tomatoes; 11-15, flagellates of biphasic medium;
16-2 1, flagellates of old cultures in LIT medium.
detected, mostly immobile; some presenting a rudimentary external flagellum and some with no flagellum at all as depicted
in Fig. 1. Inoculation of fruit sap into the biphasic culture medium yielded rich cultures, 2 of them (9T and 10T) utilized in
this study. The 2 strains seem essentially identical. They could
be grown either in the biphasic or liquid LIT medium, temperature optimum 28" C. In biphasic medium, cultures grew
better when the pH of the liquid overlay was acidic (down to
-
zyxwvutsrq
z
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvuts
26 7
JANKEVICIUS ET AL.-PHYTOMONAS SERPENS IN TOMATOES
zyxwvut
zyxwvuts
zyxwvuts
Table 1. Measurements (pm) of tomato, insect and culture forms of Phytornonas serpens.
Parasites
present in
Body length
Body width
~~
Tomato
Culture (9 T)
Salivary glands
Digestive tract
(A)
(B)
(A)
(B)
6 . 9 " f 1.4b (4.3-11.4y
17.7 f 7.0 (8.4-59.3)
5.7 k 0.9 (4.0-7.7)
24.0
17.3(7.9-79.1)
4.1 f 0.8 (2.9-4.9)
16.6 f 4.3 (9.8-26.9)
5.6 -C 1.0 (4.1-7.7)
*
1.6
2.2
1.8
2.1
2.0
2.2
1.8
f 0.2(1.1-2.3)
f 0.5 (1.2-3.5)
i 0.3 (1.4-2.6)
k
0.4(1.4-2.8)
f 0.5 (1.3-2.4)
f 0.4 (1.3-2.9)
Flagellum length
Distance from nucleus
to anterior end
Distance from kinetoplast to anterior end
0.6 f 2.9(0-4.3)
15.8 f 7.0 (0-26.3)
0.2 f 0.5 (0-2.1)
5.9 7.8(0-33.5)
1.8 k 3.7 (0-7.3)
13.3 f 6.6 (0-31.3)
0
1.9 f O.S(l.1-3.9)
5.5 2.3 (2.6-22.3)
2.2 f 0.4 (1.2-3.0)
4.5 f 4.5(0.9-20.7)
1.6 k 0.3 (1.3-2.0)
5.6
1.8 (2.7-10.9)
2.9 f 0.9 (1.44.8)
0.8 f 0.4(0-2.3)
2.1 f 1 . 1 (1.2-8.6)
1.3 k 0.5 (0.7-3.5)
2.3 k l.S(l.2-7.0)
0.9 f 0.3 (0.7-1.3)
2.7 k 1.3 (0-6.9)
1.9 f 1.0 (0.2-3.2)
*
*
*
f 0.3 (1.4-2.5)
Urine
In each case measurements correspond to the mean value p), standard deviation (b) and range c) of 50 randomly selected flagellates.
In salivary glands and digestive tract of insects, the flagellates were grouped according to their size in 2 distinct populations (A and B).
Measurements of body length do not include the flagellum.
pH 3.5). The average generation time of a culture in biphasic
medium at 28" C and pH 6 was 14 h, and maximum cell concentration was 1.2 x lo8 flagellatedml. Flagellates from culture
9T are depicted in Fig. 1. Due to the great variation in size of
culture forms (Table l), we found it more informative to consider the measurements of 2 arbitrarily chosen sub-populations,
1 of small flagellates and the other of large ones. Regardless of
their size, flagellates were always of the promastigote type but
some of them, besides being very large, presented 2 to 4 body
torsions. The percentage of twisted-body promastigotes in a culture seemed to depend on medium composition and culture age,
being noticeably more abundant in old cultures in LIT medium
where they could account for up to 20-30% of the total forms
in the culture.
We have been unable to trace any developmental relationship
between the forms appearing in culture media, hence the precise
sequence of events leading to the marked pleomorphism of the
flagellate's life cycle remains obscure. That polymorphism did
actually result from mixed cultures of different organisms is
rendered unlikely by the cloning and recloning of strain 9T.
Opisto- or trypomastigotes have never been found in cultures
or in the flagellate hosts.
Experimental infection of insects. Nymphs and adults of P.
picta raised from eggs and fed on clean tomatoes were always
free of flagellates. When the insects were fed on tomatoes which
were either naturally or artificially infected, they became infected after 10-1 5 days, displaying flagellates in feces, urine,
digestive tube and salivary glands. Insect forms, which exhibit
great polymorphism, are sketched in Fig. 2; measurements are
given in Table 1.
Experimental infection of tomatoes. Tomato plants grown
from seed under protected laboratory conditions always produced flagellate-free fruits. When desired, fruits were infected
either through needle inoculation of culture forms or through
bite of infected insects. Tomatoes could be easily infected either
way. Once infected, they so remained until rotting. The flagellates multiplied actively in the fruits' sap: inoculation of 5 x
1O5 flagellates yielded in 10 days a n average of 1 x 1O9 organisms
per fruit. Figure 1 depicts the forms found in tomatoes artificially
infected.
Life cycle. As noted, flagellates could be readily transmitted
from tomatoes to insects and back to tomatoes. They were also
culturable from insects or tomatoes. Culture forms, in turn,
could also infect tomatoes or insects. In evey case the flagellates
recovered were of the promastigote type, displaying the same
kind of polymorphism as depicted in Fig. 1 and 2.
Electron microscopy. Electron-micrographs of flagellates from
cultures in biphasic medium are presented in Fig. 3-5. The
culture forms exhibited the standard characteristics of a trypanosomatid without obvious peculiarities, except that mito-
chondrial cristae were very scarce while the mitochondria1
matrix was very dense-a feature displayed also by other phytomonads [2]. Also in common with other phytomonads was
the abundant presence of lipid droplets in the cytoplasm of
culture forms.
Some of the small forms found in cultures seemed to totally
lack a flagellum, including its intracellular portion (not shown)
whereas others exhibited a rudimentary one, barely noticeable
by light microscopy (Fig. 4). This rudimentary flagellum seen
by EM revealed the regular organization of a normal flagellum,
except for absence of the intraflagellar structure (IFS) present
in the larger forms as well as in most trypanosomatid species
[ 141. The external tip of the flagellum of the small forms had a
dense, non-fibrilar material (Fig. 5) not yet reported in trypanosomatids.
The lumen of the salivary glands were found to be intensely
populated by flagellates which were also detected in the cytoplasm of the acinar cells. A morphological study of the salivary
forms will be published elsewhere.
Reactivity with monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies specific for Phytomonas spp. [24] always yielded positive
results when tested against flagellates from insects, from cultures
(9T, 10T, 15T) or from tomatoes artificially infected with strains
9T and 10T.
Endonuclease digestion of k-DNA. Digestion of the k-DNA
of different phytomonad isolates revealed marked differences
among them. When digested with the 6-cutter enzymes BamHI
and EcoRI, the k-DNA of the flagellates from tomato and E .
pinea failed to produce fragments. However, EcoRI readily digested the k-DNA of the isolates from J. macanthra and E .
hyssopifolia, yielding fragments smaller than 2 kb.
Upon digestion with the 4-cutter enzyme HpaII, k-DNA of
the flagellate from E. pinea produced a single fragment the length
of a minicircle, as similarly reported by Riou [22]. The k-DNA
of the tomato flagellate also produced a single fragment but
apparently with half the size of a minicircle, suggesting the existence of 2 symmetrical restriction sites for this enzyme at
minicircle length. Digestion of the k-DNA of the other flagellates
produced various fragments of different sizes.
Digestion of the k-DNA of the various flagellates with Sau3A
produced fragments with organism-specific electrophoretic patterns (Fig. 6 ) . For the tomato flagellate, digestion with Sau3A
produced a single fragment with apparently half the size of a
minicircle- again suggestive of the existence of 2 symmetrical
sites for this enzyme also.
zyxwvutsrqpo
DISCUSSION
Cultures of trypanosomatids from plants are recent [3, 10, 19,
251; and until now cultures of phytomonads from vector insects
were not available. Lack of isolates and cultures of Phytomonas
268
zyx
zyxwvutsrqpo
zyxwvutsrqponmlk
zyxwvu
zyxwvu
J . PROTOZOOL., VOL. 36, NO. 3, MAY-JUNE 1989
.
10 p m
8
8 8
0
8
$
.......
...:
..
..
..
...
c
10 Nrn
zy
zyxwvutsrqponml
30
Fig. 2. Phytomonas serpens. strain 9T, in the insect Phthia picta: 1-15, flagellates of urine; 16-30, flagellates from the digestive tract.
+
Fig. 3-5. Thin sections of culture forms of Phytomonas serpens. 3. Longitudinal section of the predominant culture form in biphasic medium,
Longitudinal section of the smali culture form, x 20,000. 5. Longitudinal section of the flagellum of the small culture form, x 80,000,
The arrow points to the tip of the flagellum. K: kinetoplast; N: nucleus; F: flagellum; M: mitochondrion.
x 20,000. 4.
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvutsrq
zyxw
JANKEVICIUS ET AL. -PHYTOMONAS SERPENS IN TOMATOES
269
270
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvutsrqponmlk
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvu
z
J. PROTOZOOL., VOL. 36, NO. 3, MAY-JUNE
Fig. 6. Electrophoretic patterns of k-DNA fragments of different
Phytomonas spp. digested with the Sau3A restriction endonuclease. 1.
MW markers (A DNA digested with HindIII); 2. Phytomonas serpens;
3. Phytomonas sp. from Euphorbia pinea; 4. Phytomonas sp. from E.
characias;5. Phytomonas sp. from Jathropa macrantha ;6. Phytomonas
sp. from E. hyssopifolia.
spp. had precluded adequate studies of the biochemical and
morphological characteristics of this group of flagellates. Only
recently have biochemical and EM comparative studies been
done between species of Phytomonas and other Trypanosomatids [2, 3, 6, 11, 20, 261 and monoclonal antibodies raised
to identify phytomonads [24].
As noted, a trypanosomatid from tomatoes had been reported
much earlier [ 151. This flagellate could have been placed from
the outset in Phytomonas, for, by the prevailing criterion at the
time, plant parasitism sufficed to define this genus. However,
Conchon et al. [7] have shown that flagellates of other genera
of Trypanosomatidae can also thrive on tomatoes and then
infect insects. No longer then is it to be taken for granted that
trypanosomatids encountered in plants necessarily belong to
Phytomonas. Utilization of additional criteria is now essential.
Accordingly, morphological, biochemical and immunological
studies were conducted on the forms derived from tomatoes,
insects and cultures throughout the flagellate’s life cycle.
Although there is no description of the complete life cycle
and biochemical characteristics of another Phytomonas sp. to
compare with the tomato flagellate, the following facts may
justify calling this flagellate a Phytomonas: a) its life cycle comprises a plant and an insect; b) only promastigotes are found
throughout the flagellate’s life cycle; c) its enzymic constitution
in respect to ornithine-arginine metabolism conforms to that of
other Phytomonas spp.; and d) all developmental forms of the
1989
flagellate are recognized by monoclonal antibodies specific for
Phytomonas.
Since the k-DNA endonuclease digestion patterns of the tomato flagellate are clearly distinct from the patterns of other
Phytomonas spp., we may denote it as a separate species. Although there is no way to tell whether the present isolate indeed
corresponds to Gibb’s Leptomonas serpens, we retain the species
name as Phytomonas serpens as recognition of the historical link
between the 2 flagellates, thereby honoring the pioneering work
of Gibbs.
That P. serpens was originally isolated from tomato fruits
does not rule out the possibility of other plants harboring it. As
for its transmission to tomatoes, the hemipteran coreid Phthia
picta seems a good candidate for being its natural vector: it
usually feeds on tomatoes, is frequently found in nature infected
with promastigotes positive for Phytomonas-specific monoclonals [Camargo et al., unpubl.] and under laboratorial conditions was easily infected with P. serpens and thereafter able
to transmit the infection to clean tomatoes. But it may not be
the sole vector of P. serpens: other insects also feed on tomatoes
and may serve to disseminate the parasite. Actually, preliminary
experiments suggest that the bug Nezara viridula is also easily
infected with culture forms of the flagellate. Thus, considering
the large variety of insects that feed on tomatoes in Brazil [I,
81, and that these insects may feed alternatively on different
fruits, P. serpens may well be discovered in other plants and
insects. Availability of cultures and of biochemical markers for
the identification of P. serpens now permits the exploration of
this possibility.
As for a possible pathogenicity of P. serpens to tomatoes, we
have not detected any damaging effect to fruits or plants; but
this may merely reflect lack of expertise there.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Brazilian agencies FAPESP,
FINEP, CPG/UEL and Secretaria de CiCncia e Tecnologia, SP,
and by The Commission of European Communities.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Araujo e Silva, A. G., Gonqalves, C. R., Galvlo, D. M., Gonqalves,
A. J. L., Gomes, J., Silva, M. N. & Simoni, L. 1968. Quarto cat&logo
dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil. Laboratbrio Central de
Patologia Vegetal, Ministtrio da Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro.
2. Attias, M, Roitman, I., Camargo, E. P., Dollet, M. & Souza, W.
1988. Comparative analysis of the fine structure of four isolates of
trypanosomatids of the genus Phytomonas. J. Protozool., 39365-370.
3. Attias, M. & de Souza, W. 1986. Axenic cultivation and ultrastructural study of a Phytomonas sp. isolated from the milkweed plant
Euphorbia hyssopifolia. J. Protozool., 33:84-87.
4. Camargo, E. P. 1964. Growth and differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi. I. Origin of metacyclic trypanosomes in liquid medium.
Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Scio Paulo, 6:93-100.
5. Camargo, E. P., Mattei, D. M., Barbieri, C. L. & Morel, C. M.
1982. Electrophoretic analysis of endonuclease-generated fragments of
k-DNA, of esterase isoenzymes, and of surface proteins as aids for
species identification of insect trypanosomatids. J. Protozool., 29:25 1258.
6. Carnargo, E. P., Silva, S., Roitman, I., Souza, W., Jankevicius, J.
V. & Dollet, M. 1987. Enzymes of ornithine-arginine metabolism in
trypanosomatids of the genus Phytomonas. J. Protozool., 34:439441.
7. Conchon, I., Campaner, M., Sbravate, C. & Camargo, E. P. 1989.
Trypanosomatids, other than Phytomonas spp., isolated from fruits. J.
Protozool., 36. (in press)
8. Costa Lima, A. 1940. Insetos do Brasil. Escola Nacional de
Agronomia, Sene Didatica 6 , Rio de Janeiro.
9. Dollet, M. 1984. Plant diseases caused by flagellate protozoa
(Phytomonas).Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 22: 115-132.
zyxwv
zy
z
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvut
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwvutsrqpo
JANKEVICIUS ET AL.-PHYTOMONAS SERPENS IN TOMATOES
10. Dollet, M., Cambrony, D. & Gargani, D. 1982. Culture ax&
nique “in vitro” de Phytomonas sp. (Trypanosomatidae) d‘Euphorbe,
transmis par Stenocephalus agilis Scop. (Coreidae). C. R. Acad. Sci.,
ser. 111, 295547450.
1 I. Dollet, M. & Wallace, F. G. 1987. Compte rendu du premier
Phytomonas workshop-Cayenne, Mars 1987. Olkagineux, 42:46 1465.
12. Donovan, C. 1909. Kala-azar in Madras, specially with regard
to its connection with the dog and the bug (Conorhinus). Lancet, i: 14951496.
13. Fiorini, J. E., Silva, F. P. M., Brasil, R. P., Roitman, I., Angluster,
J., Souza, W. & Esteves, M. J. G. 1986. Detection oftrypanosomatids
in the Solanum giro and Solanum lycopersicon in Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Mern. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, 81(Suppl.):33.
14. Freymuller, E. & Camargo, E. P. 1981. Ultrastructural differences between species of trypanosomatids with and without endosymbionts. J. Protozool., 28:175-182.
15. Gibbs, A. J. 1957. Leptomonas serpens n. sp. parasitic in the
digestive tract and salivary glands of Nezara viridula (Pentatomidae)
and in the sap of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and other plants.
Parasitology. 47:297-303.
16. Holmes, F. 0. 1925. Non-pathogenicity of the milkweed Aagellates in Maryland. Phytopathology, 22: 1 15-1 32.
17. Jankevicius, S. I., Jankevicius, J. V., Menezes, M. C. M. D., Lima,
H. & Menezes, J. R. 1987. Presence of protozoa of the genus Phytomonas in leguminous crops. Brazil. Phytopathol., 12: 152.
18. Jankevicius, S. I., Jankevicius, J. V., Menezes, M. C. M. D.,
Torrezan, H. C., Menezes, J. R. & Rezende, M. I. 1987. Phytomonas
sp. found in leguminous crops. Mern. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, 82(Suppl.):
35.
27 1
19. Kastelein, P. & Parsadi, M. Observations on cultures of the
protozoa Phytomonas sp. (Trypanosomatidae) associated with the lactifer Allamanda cathartica L. (Apocynaceae). De Surin. Landb., 32%89.
20. Petry, K., Chottelius, J. & Dollet, M. 1987. Differentiation of
Phytomonas sp. and lower trypanosomatids (Herpetomonas, Crithidia)
by agglutination tests with lectins. Parasitol. Res., 74: 1-4.
2 1. Podlipaev, S. A. 1986. Phytomonas elmassiani (Mastigophora:
Trypanosomatidae) from the plant Cynanchum sibiricum (Asclepiadaceae) in Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Proc. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci.
USSR, 144~61-65.
22. Riou, J. F., Dollet, M., Ahomadegbe, J. G., Coulaud, D. & Riou,
G. 1987. Characterization ofPhytomonas sp. kinetoplast DNA, a plant
pathogenic trypanosomal species. FEBS Letters, 213:304-308.
23. Roitman, C., Roitman, I. & Azevedo, H. P. 1972. Growth of
an insect trypanosomatid at 37°C in a defined medium. J. Protozool.,
19:346-349.
24. Teixeira, M. M. G. & Camargo, E. P. 1989. Monoclonal antibodies for the identification of trypanosomatids of the genus Phytomonas. J. Prolozool., 36262-264.
25. Vainstein, M. H. & Roitman, I. 1986. Cultivation of Phytomonas franqai associated with poor development of root system of
cassava. J. Protozool., 33:511-513.
26. Vainstein, M. H., Silva, J. B. T., Lima, V. M. Q. G., Roitman,
I., Souza, W., Dollet, M. & Camargo, E. P. 1987. Electrophoretic
analysis of isoenzymes in the identification of trypanosomatids of the
genus Phytomonas. J. Protozool., 24:442-444.
zyxwv
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjih
zyxwvutsrqponmlkj
zyxwvutsrqpo
J. Prolozool.. 36(3), 1989, pp. 271-274
0 1989 by the Society of Protozoologists
Coccidian Parasites (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) of Nevodia spp.
(Serpentes: Colubridae), with a Description of a
New Species of Eimeria
CHRIS T. McALLISTER* and STEVE J. UPTON**
*Renal-Metabolic Lab (151-G), Veterans Administration Medical Center, 4500 S. Lancaster Road, Dallas, Texas 75216 and
Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203 and
**Division of Biology, Ackert Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506
ABSTRACT. Eimeria conanti n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) is described from intestinal contents and feces of Nerodia erythrogaster
transversa and N. harteri harteri from northcentral Texas. Oocysts of the new species are ellipsoid in shape, 17.9 x 13.0 (15-2 1 x 1215) pm, with a smooth, thin, single-layered wall; shape index 1.4 (1.2-1.5). One to several (usually 2) polar granule(s) and an oocyst
residuum are present, but a micropyle i s absent. Sporocysts are elongate, 12.9 x 5.2 (13-15 x 5-6) pm, apparently without a true
Stieda body structure. Each sporocyst contains an ellipsoid residuum, 3.9 x 3.2 (3-6 x 2 4 ) prn. and elongate sporozoites, 11.4 x 2.5
(10-14 x 2-3) prn in situ, each with a spherical or subspherical anterior refractile body and spherical to ellipsoid posterior refractile
body. In addition to the new species, oocysts of 4 previously described eimerians from colubrid snakes were found in these hosts.
Key words. Coccidia, Cryptosporidium sp., Eimeria spp., Eimeria conanti n. sp., eimerians, survey, water snakes.
T
HE blotched water snake, Nerodia erythrogaster transversa
(Hallowell, 1852), is a moderately large semiaquatic colubrid commonly found from western Arkansas and Missouri
westward to Kansas and south through central Texas to northeastern MCxico [3]. This taxon inhabits various aquatic sites
ranging from semipermanent ditches and cattle tanks to permanent rivers and tributaries. On the other hand, the Brazos
water snake, N. harteri harteri (Trapido, 194 l), a protected subspecies of Harter’s water snake, is a relatively small colubrid
which is locally abundant but restricted to swift-flowing, rocky
streams in the upper Brazos River watershed of 10 counties in
northcentral Texas [ 5 , 71. Interestingly, both N. e. transversa
and N. h. harteri, as well as the diamondback water snake, N.
rhomblfera rhombifera, are sympatric at various localities along
the Brazos River.
Recently, Upton & McAllister [9] described 3 new species of
Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from N . r. rhombifera and
Upton et al. [ 101added an unnamed species of Cryptosporidium
to the list of coccidial parasites harbored by N. r. rhombifera
and N. h. harteri. There is a plethora of information on helminth
parasites of N. erythrogaster [ I , 2, 4, 8 and others]; however, to
our knowledge, N . e. transversa has not been previously surveyed for coccidia. In addition, other than the report of Cryptosporidium sp. in a single N. h. harteri [lo], nothing is known
about its eimerian parasites.
Between July 1987 and October 1988, we examined 37 Ne-