a. Early traditions like alchemy, medicine, and technology laid foundations for chemistry but lacked scientific rigor, relying on mysticism or practical skills. They contributed laboratory methods still used today.
b. The phlogiston theory, which proposed an undetectable substance called phlogiston was released during burning, was disproven through Lavoisier's quantitative experiments showing that oxygen from air combines with combustible substances.
c. Lavoisier is considered the founder of modern chemistry for introducing quantitative experimentation and measurement to explain chemical reactions and properties rather than mystical concepts.
a. Early traditions like alchemy, medicine, and technology laid foundations for chemistry but lacked scientific rigor, relying on mysticism or practical skills. They contributed laboratory methods still used today.
b. The phlogiston theory, which proposed an undetectable substance called phlogiston was released during burning, was disproven through Lavoisier's quantitative experiments showing that oxygen from air combines with combustible substances.
c. Lavoisier is considered the founder of modern chemistry for introducing quantitative experimentation and measurement to explain chemical reactions and properties rather than mystical concepts.
a. Early traditions like alchemy, medicine, and technology laid foundations for chemistry but lacked scientific rigor, relying on mysticism or practical skills. They contributed laboratory methods still used today.
b. The phlogiston theory, which proposed an undetectable substance called phlogiston was released during burning, was disproven through Lavoisier's quantitative experiments showing that oxygen from air combines with combustible substances.
c. Lavoisier is considered the founder of modern chemistry for introducing quantitative experimentation and measurement to explain chemical reactions and properties rather than mystical concepts.
PHASE CHANGE Each physical state is caleed a phase, a physically distinct, homogeneus part of a system. The water in a closed container constitutes one phase; the water vapor above the liquid is a second phase; add some ice, and there are three. In this section, you’ll see that interactions between the potential energy and the kinetic energy
12. 2 CHEMICAL ARTS AND THE ORIGIN OF
MODERN CHEMISTRY This brief overview of early breakthroughs, and a few false directions, describes how the modern science of chemistry arose and progressed. Prechemical Traditions Chemistry had its origin in a prescientifi c past that incorporated three overlapping traditions—alchemy, medicine, and technology: 1. The alchemical tradition. Alchemy was an occult study of nature that began in the 1st century ad and dominated thinking for over 1500 years. Originally infl uenced by the Greek idea that matter strives for “perfection,” alchemists later became obsessed with converting “baser” metals, such as lead, into “purer” ones, such as gold. The alchemists’ names for substances and their belief that matter could be altered magically were very diffi cult to correct over the centuries. Their legacy to chemistry was in technical methods. They invented distillation, percolation, and extraction and devised apparatus still used routinely today (Figure 1.4). But perhaps even more important was that alchemists encouraged observation and experimentation, which replaced the Greek approach of explaining nature solely through reason. 2. The medical tradition. Alchemists also infl uenced medical practice in medieval Europe. And ever since the 13th century, distillates and extracts of roots, herbs, and other plant matter have been used as sources of medicines. The alchemist and physician Paracelsus (1493–1541) considered the body to be a chemical system and illness an imbalance that could be restored by treatment with drugs. Although many early prescriptions were useless, later ones had increasing success. Thus began the alliance between medicine and chemistry that thrives today. 3. The technological tradition. For thousands of years, pottery making, dyeing, and especially metallurgy contributed greatly to people’s experience with materials. During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, books were published that described how to purify, assay, and coin silver and gold, how to use balances, furnaces, and crucibles, and how to make glass and gunpowder. Some introduced quantitative measurement, which was lacking in alchemical writings. Many creations from those times are still marveled at throughout the world. Nevertheless, the skilled artisans showed little interest in why a substance changes or how to predict its behavior. The Phlogiston Fiasco and the Impact of Lavoisier Chemical investigation in the modern sense—inquiry into the causes of changes in matter—began in the late 17th century. At that time, most scientists explained combustion, the process of burning, with the phlogiston theory. It proposed that combustible materials contain phlogiston, an undetectable substance released when the material burns. Highly combustible materials like charcoal were thought to contain a lot of phlogiston, and slightly combustible materials like metals only a little. But inconsistencies continuously arose. Phlogiston critics: Why is air needed for combustion, and why does charcoal stop burning in a closed vessel? Phlogiston supporters: Air “attracts” phlogiston out of the charcoal, and burning stops when the air in the vessel is “sat urated” with phlogiston. Critics also noted that when a metal burns, it forms its calx, which weighs more than the metal, leading them to ask, Critics: How can the loss of phlogiston cause a gain in mass? Supporters: Phlogiston has negative mass. As ridiculous as these responses seem now, it’s important to remember that, even today, scientists may dismiss conflicting evidence rather than abandon an accepted idea. The conflict over phlogiston was resolved when the young French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794) performed several experiments: 1. Heating mercury calx decomposed it into two products—mercury and a gas— whose total mass equaled the starting mass of the calx. 2. Heating mercury with the gas reformed the calx, and, again, the total mass remained constant. 3. Heating mercury in a measured volume of air yielded mercury calx and left fourfifths of the air remaining. 4. A burning candle placed in the remaining air was extinguished. Lavoisier named the gas oxygen and gave metal calxes the name metal oxides. His explanation of his results made the phlogiston theory irrelevant: • Oxygen, a normal component of air, combines with a substance when it burns. • In a closed container, a combustible substance stops burning when it has combined with all the available oxygen. • A metal calx (metal oxide) weighs more than the metal because its mass includes the mass of the oxygen. This new theory triumphed because it relied on quantitative, reproducible measurements, not on strange properties of undetectable substances. Because this approach is at the heart of science, many propose that the science of chemistry began with Lavoisier. Summary a. Alchemy, medicine, and technology placed little emphasis on objective experimentation, focusing instead on mystical explanations or practical experience, but these traditions contributed some apparatus and methods that are still important. b. Lavoisier overthrew the phlogiston theory by showing quantitatively that oxygen, a component of air, is required for combustion and combines with a burning substance. g