When Children Fail in School: What Teachers and Parents Need to Know About Learned Helplessness
1. WHEN CHILDREN FAIL IN SCHOOL
WHAT TEACHERS AND PARENTS NEED TO
KNOW ABOUT LEARNED HELPLESSNESS
A Psychoeducation forTeachers Skill-Building Guide
2. Background
Learned helplessness is the belief that our own behavior
does not influence what happens next; that is, behavior
does not control outcomes or results. For example, when a
student believes that she is in charge of the outcome, she
may think, “If I study hard for this test, I’ll get a good
grade.” On the contrary, a learned helpless student thinks,
“No matter how hard I study for this test, I’ll always get a
bad grade.”
In school, learned helplessness relates to poor grades and
underachievement, and to behavior difficulties. Students
who experience repeated school failure are particularly
prone to develop a learned helpless response style.
3. Because of repeated academic failure, these
students begin to doubt their own abilities, leading
them to doubt that they can do anything to
overcome their school difficulties. Consequently,
they decrease their achievement efforts,
particularly when faced with difficult materials,
which leads to more school failure.This pattern of
giving up when facing difficult tasks reinforces the
child’s belief that he or she cannot overcome his or
her academic difficulties.
4. Learned helplessness seems to contribute to the
school failure experienced by many students
with a learning disability. In a never-ending
cycle, children with a learning disability
frequently experience school difficulties over an
extended period, and across a variety of tasks,
school settings, and teachers, which in turn
reinforces the child’s feeling of being helpless.
5. Characteristics of Learned Helpless
Students
Some characteristics of learned helpless children are…
Low motivation to learn, and diminished aspirations to succeed
in school.
Low outcome expectations; that is, they believe that, no matter
what they do in school, the outcome will always be negative
(e.g., bad grades). In addition, they believe that they are
powerless to prevent or overcome a negative outcome.
Lack of perceived control over their own behavior and the
environmental events; one’s own actions cannot lead to success.
Lack of confidence in their skills and abilities (low self-efficacy
expectations).These children believe that their school difficulties
are caused by their own lack of ability and low intelligence, even
when they have adequate ability and normal intelligence.They
are convinced that they are unable to perform the required
actions to achieve a positive outcome.
6. They underestimate their performance when they do
well in school, attributing success to luck or chance,
e.g., “I was lucky that this test was easy.”
They generalize from one failure situation or negative
experience to other situations where control is possible.
Because they expect failure all the time, regardless of
their real skills and abilities, they underperform all the
time.
They focus on what they cannot do, rather than
focusing on their strengths and skills.
Because they feel incapable of implementing the
necessary courses of action, they develop passivity and
their school performance deteriorates.
7. The Pessimistic Explanatory Style
Learned helpless students, perceive school failure as
something that they will never overcome, and academic
events, positive or negative, as something out of their
control.This expectation of failure and perceived lack of
control is central in the development of a learned helpless
style.
The way in which children perceive and interpret their
experiences in the classroom helps us understand why
some children develop an optimistic explanatory style,
believing that they are capable of achieving in school, and
other children develop a pessimistic explanatory style,
believing that they are not capable of succeeding in school
(Seligman, Reivich, Jaycox, and Gilham, 1995).
8. Children with an optimistic explanatory style attribute school failure
to momentary and specific circumstances; for example, “I just
happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.” Children with
a pessimistic explanatory style explain negative events as something
stable (the cause of the negative event will always be present), global
(the cause of the negative event affects all areas of their lives), and
internal (they conclude that they are fully responsible for the
outcome or consequence of the negative event).
A typical pessimistic explanatory style is, “I always fail no matter
what I do.” On the contrary, when the outcome of the event is
positive, a pessimistic child attributes the outcome to unstable (the
cause of the event is transitory), specific (the cause of the event is
situation specific), and external (other people or circumstances are
responsible for the outcome) causes.
9. Learned Helpless Students Need Learning
Strategies
Due to this perceived lack of control of the
negative event, a learned helpless child is
reluctant to seek assistance or help when he is
having difficulty performing an academic task.
These children are ineffective in using learning
strategies, and they do not know how to engage
in strategic task behavior to solve academic
problems. For instance, learned helpless children
are unaware that if they create a plan, use a
checklist, and/or make drawings, it will be easier
for them to solve a multistep math word
problem.
10. With learned helpless children, success alone (e.g., solving accurately
the multistep problem), is not going to ease their helpless perception
or boost their self-confidence; remember that these children
attribute their specific successes to luck or to chance.
According to Eccles, Wigfield, and Schiefele (1998), trying to
persuade a learned helpless child that she can succeed, and asking
her just to try hard, will be ineffective if we do not teach the child
specific learning and compensatory strategies that she can apply to
improve her performance when facing a difficult task.The authors
state that the key in helping a learned helpless child overcome this
dysfunctional explanatory pattern is to provide strategy retraining
(teaching her strategies to use, and explicitly teaching when she can
use those strategies), so that we give the child specific ways to
remedy achievement problems.This should be coupled with
attribution retraining, or creating and maintaining a success
expectation.
11. When we teach a learned helpless child to use learning
strategies, we are giving her the tools she needs to
develop and maintain the perception that she has the
resources to reverse failure.
Ames (1990) recommends that, in combination with the
learning strategies, we help the learned helpless child
develop individualized short-term goals, e.g., “I will
make drawings to accurately solve a two-steps math
word problem.”
When the child knows and implements learning
strategies, she will be able to experience progress
toward her individualized goals.
12. Learned Helpless Students Need to
Believe that Effort Increases Skills
To accomplish this, we need to help learned helpless children
recognize and take credit for the skills and abilities that they
already have. In addition, we need to develop in children the
belief that ability is incremental, not fixed; that is, effort increases
ability and skills.Tollefson (2000) recommends that we help
children see success as improvement; that is, we are successful
when we acquire or refine knowledge and skills we did not have
before.
We need to avoid communicating children that, to succeed in
school, they need to perform at a particular level, or they need to
perform at the same level than other students.When we help
children see success as improvement, statesTollefson, we are
encouraging them to expend effort to remediate their academic
difficulties. In addition, we are training them to focus on
strategies and the process of learning, rather than outcomes and
achievement.
13. Concluding Comments
To minimize the negative impact of learned helplessness in
children, we need to train them to focus on strategies and
processes to reach their academic goals, reinforcing the
belief that, through effort, they are in control of their own
behavior, and that they are in charge of developing their
own academic skills. For example, to help a child focus on
the learning process, after failure, we can tell the child,
“Maybe you can think of another way of doing this.”This
way, our feedback stays focused on the child’s effort and
the learning strategies he or she is using –both within the
child’s control and both modifiable.
When children themselves learn to focus on effort and
strategies, they can start feeling responsible for positive
outcomes, and responsible for their own successes in
school and in life.
14. References (Part 1)
1. Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation:What teachers need
to know. Teachers College Record.Vol. 91, No. 3, pp.
409-421.
2. Eccles, S.,Wigfield,A., and Schiefele, U. (1998).
Motivation to succeed. In Eisenberg, N. (Ed.)
Handbook of Child Psychology.Vol. 3 (5th ed., pp.
1017-1095). NewYork:Wiley.
3. Seligman, M. E., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., & Gillham, J.
(1995). The optimistic child. NewYork: Houghton
Mifflin.
4. Tollefson, N. (2000). Classroom applications of
cognitive theories of motivation. Educational
Psychology Review,Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 63-83.
16. Background Information
Learned helplessness is a dysfunctional condition that keeps
students’ self-confidence extremely low and perpetuates their
perception that they are not able to cope successfully with
academic demands and school challenges. Sutherland and Singh
(2004) state that learned helplessness contributes to the school
failure that many students with emotional and/or behavioral
disorders experience.The authors add that, the kind of school
failure experienced by children with a learning disability –over
long periods and across a variety of tasks, settings, and teachers-
puts LD students at risk of developing learned helplessness.
According to Burhans and Dweck (1995), children prone to
helpless behavior patterns in the classroom are more likely to
avoid the possibility of academic failure than to increase their
effort in achieving academic success.
17. Without a healthy self-confidence, learned helpless students
give up academically, because they do not expect to be
successful in school and they anticipate failure in everything
they try or do. Because students prone to a learned helpless
response pattern do not think strategically and they avoid risk
taking behaviors, rather than overcoming learned helplessness,
this perception of academic failure gets worse in older
students.
Learned helpless students often put themselves down and
ignore or minimize praise and compliment from others, in
particular from teachers, so, school staff and parents must
intervene skillfully to help these children overcome a learned
helpless response pattern. Some guidelines follow, but first, I
introduce some important concepts.
18. Key Concepts
It is important that teachers and parents understand
that low self-confidence and learned helplessness do
not necessarily relate to a lack of ability. Students
with average ability and average academic skills can
evidence low self-confidence and/or learned
helplessness.
Self-confidence and learned helplessness are both
perceptions, and these perceptions can be accurate
(the child lacks academic skills) or inaccurate (the
child has adequate skills and average ability).
However, for the student, perception is reality;
learned helpless students firmly believe that their
lack of ability causes their school difficulties.
19. Learned helpless children believe that their own behavior (i.e.
trying hard and making an effort) has no positive effect on
consequent events, which not only undermines the child’s
motivation to learn, but also reduces his or her ability to learn,
and deteriorates school performance (Seligman, 1995).Ames
(1990) describes learned helpless children as students that
typically exhibit low expectations, negative affect (negative
beliefs and feelings), and ineffective learning strategies.
For this reason, we need to deal with learned helplessness at
the attributions or motivation level, the feelings level, and the
academic or strategic level, which may require active
involvement and coordinated effort from teachers, parents,
and in more extreme cases, school counselors and/or school
psychologists.
20. To understand better the learned helpless child, attribution style
(Weiner, 1979) is a key concept. Attribution is the process of drawing
inferences about the cause of a given outcome. For example, when
we ask students to explain the reason for their success or failure on an
academic task, the most common causes cited are ability, effort, task
difficulty, or just plain luck. Ability and effort are internal attributions
(inside the individual); task difficulty and luck are external attributions
(outside the individual).Ability and task difficulty are stable or fixed
attributions (do not change); effort and luck are unstable or variable
attributions (change).
In summary, we can classify attributions as internal-external and
fixed-variable.Two other dimensions that we need to consider are
global attribution (believing that the cause of a negative event is
consistent across different contexts) versus specific attribution, or
believing that the cause of the negative event is unique to a particular
time or to a particular setting.
21. Weiner and others classified attributions along three causal
dimensions: locus of control, stability, and controllability. Locus
of control includes two poles: internal and external. Stability
refers to whether causes change over time or not. Finally,
controllability contrasts the causes that one can control (i.e.
child’s skills or the child using learning strategies) from those
causes that the child cannot control, like luck.
Attribution style explains both low motivation and learned
helplessness based on the reasons to which children attribute
their successes or failure in academic tasks. According to this
theory, students feel less motivated to achieve in school when
they believe both (a) that ability is permanent and cannot be
changed, and, (b) due to low ability, they have little or no
control over their successes.
22. Attributions theory, in particular the concept
of attribution style, remains one of the most
popular theories to understand the difference
in motivation and effort between high-
achieving and low-achieving students.
23. Ames (1990) defines learned helplessness as a dysfunctional
attributions pattern characterized by both passivity and loss of
motivation in responding to academic tasks, in particular, those tasks
that the learned helpless child perceives as challenging, or that
require effort and persistence from the student. As we said earlier,
learned helpless students believe that ability is fixed and all that they
see is their own personal deficiencies and inadequacies.
Low achieving and/or learned helpless students do not see the
connection between their own effort and achieving in school,
believing that school failure simply reflects their low ability (an
internal and stable attribution), and that they lack the skills and/or
ability they need to be able to reverse school failure.These students
exhibit a helpless motivation pattern, taking little or no responsibility
for their own successes (However, they take all the blame when they
fail), and underestimating their performance when they do well on a
task.
24. For example, if the child performs well on a test, is
because of good luck or because the test was too
easy, both external attributions that are outside the
child’s control. Learned helpless students hold a
self-perpetuating set of negative beliefs and
attitudes that depresses their engagement and
persistence in academic tasks, which makes learned
helplessness primarily a motivation problem.
To help children overcome this helpless response
pattern, first, we need to intervene at the
perceptions (beliefs and attitudes) and motivation
levels.
25. On the next section, I present some
guidelines in using attributions theory and
attributions retraining to help children
overcome a learned helpless response style…
26. Motivation Strategies
Challenge the student’s belief that ability is fixed, helping the child
understand that ability is incremental, that is, with focused practice and
enough time, we can increase our skill or ability in doing a task. Help the
child focus on the task rather than on her abilities.
Define success as improvement, or developing knowledge and skills that
the student did not have before. Avoid defining academic success as
performing at a pre-established level (i.e. grades) or in comparison with
other students (Tollefson, 2000).
Help the student shift from focusing on the performance aspects of the
task (normative comparisons) to concentrating on the task itself (in how
to do the task; steps or procedure).
Challenge the student’s belief that spending high levels of effort in a
task or a skill is the same as having low ability (Tollefson, 2000). Sports
analogies are excellent to help children understand that all high-level
skills require a high amount of effort.
Link effort with performance, telling the child that he is improving his
skills because he works hard.
27. Make sure the child clearly sees the connection between her own
effort and school success. Children who perceive this connection are
more likely to respond to difficult tasks and/or failure with less
frustration and with positive expectations about the outcome of the
event (Ames, 1990).
In schools, attributions retraining focus in teaching students that
effort rather than ability determines success in school. Most
specifically, attributions retraining teach children to attribute success
to effort, and failure to inadequate effort. For example, we tell the
child that he was trying hard when he succeeded and he needed to
try harder when he failed. Students trained in attributing success and
failure to the amount of effort they spent, perseverate more on
academic tasks than students that believe that success and failure are
due to innate ability. Most importantly, students that attribute failure
to lack of effort see their future school performance as something
that they can control.
28. Make sure that you define effort correctly, telling the student that effort is
spending effective and strategic time on the learning task. Just trying harder
or spending time doing random activities that are not working is not
effective effort; effective and strategic effort focuses on learning strategies
and procedures, that is, trying hard in a particular way is what leads to
success.When the strategy or procedure that the child is using is not
working, we tell her to use a different strategy or a different procedure.
Teaching students to make strategic effort attributions help them see failure
and academic difficulties as problem solving situations in which the search
for a better strategy becomes their focus (Weiner, 1980).
When we train learned helpless students in using strategic effort attributions,
we can weaken the child’s perception that her lack of ability is the problem,
helping her understand that the problem lies in using an ineffective strategy
or an inadequate procedure. She simply needs to find a better strategy to
solve that particular problem.
29. Teach the student to see academic errors and mistakes as her cue to change
the learning strategy that she is using.
Model to the student how to manage failure and setbacks in a constructive
and strategic way, for example, saying, “This is not working. What is another
way that I can do this?” Alternatively, “What is another strategy that I can
try?”
When you praise the student, tell him what he did well on the past, like,
“You’ve been working hard,” avoiding focusing on the future, for example,
“You need to try harder.”When we tell children that they need to work
harder, they may think that they are not doing well or that the task will be
difficult.
Avoid praising the student for doing easy tasks, for example, praising a fifth
grader because she completed ten one-digit addition facts. Instead, praise
the child for her willingness to engage in academic tasks and her persistence.
Your praise should be specific, not global (e.g., “Good job”), explicitly telling
the child the particular skill or behavior that you are praising.
30. Replace personal messages or comments addressed to the
child’s character (e.g., “What’s wrong with you?You never
listen”) with comments and/or feedback that are behavior-
specific, for example, “Try problem number seven again.
Remember to carry the one.” Comments addressed to the
child’s character are permanent (do not change), leading
children to make fixed and negative attributions about their
skills and abilities to handle academic tasks. Behavior-specific
feedback describes actions or behavior that the student can
improve, teaching children to address problems and academic
challenges using positive and changeable attributions.
Focus on feedback that tells the student how to do the task
(strategies), avoiding commenting on the child’s character
and/or ability to do the task, for example, “You get discouraged
easily (internal, fixed, and global attribution); you can do this.”
31. Use feedback that is constructive and task oriented. Focus your feedback on
procedure and alternative strategies, for example, “Maybe you can think of
another way of doing this,” or “Let’s try something different.” Avoid vague
and/or negative feedback (e.g., “Your essay is sloppily written”); making sure
that your feedback gives the child specific information about how to fix
errors and mistakes (e.g., “Your essay was missing…”).
Use attributions retraining to build self-confidence.Teach the child to
attribute failure to external, unstable, and specific causes, and to attribute
success to internal, stable, and global causes.With attributions retraining,
children learn to use external attributions to explain failure, attributing
failure to situational or environmental conditions, rather than blaming
themselves (Weiner, 1979). For example, failure is the result of having bad
luck with a tricky test or because the day of the test the room was too cold
and they had difficulty concentrating, in other words, failure was not their
fault.When we manipulate children’s attributions, we make sure that failure
does not affect their self-confidence, but success helps in building pride and
self-confidence.
32. In summary, from the attributions perspective, to help
children overcome a learned helpless response style, the
key lies in convincing students that their academic
performance is due primarily to factors that they can
control and they can improve.
Manipulating attributions alone will not improve self-
confidence if the child keeps failing academically. For
this reason, in combination with attributions retraining,
we need to teach alternative learning strategies
(compensatory strategies, plans, and procedures) to
give the learned helpless student specific ways to
remediate skill deficits.
33. Teach the student to regulate his own
motivation actively and purposively using
motivation regulation strategies (Wolters, 2003).
First, explain to the child that all students at one
time or another experience motivation setbacks
and obstacles, for example, they feel bored with
a particular task or they get distracted from the
task. Students can control and manipulate their
motivation to increase both intensity of effort
and engagement with the task.
34. Some motivation regulation
strategies that Wolters recommend…
Using self-administered consequences for own behavior.This strategy
involves the identification and administration of extrinsic rewards (e.g. a
snack or playing a video game after completing the task) for reaching a
particular goal associated with completing the task. For example, the
child says, “After I finish my essay, I will take a 15 minutes break to eat
my snack.” Alternatively, to influence own motivation, the student may
rely in denying himself the self-selected reward, for example, “If I don’t
finish my essay, I cannot play my video game for three days in a row.”
In addition to using tangible rewards, the child can use self-talking or
self-praising, that is, making encouraging and positive verbal
statements, for example, “Good, I finish another problem. Nice job.
Each day I get better at doing this.”
Using goal-oriented self-talking, that is, stating the reasons she has for
persisting in completing the task. For example, when tempted to quit,
the child thinks of wanting to improve her grades (a performance goal),
or she may think about wanting to satisfy her curiosity, feeling
competent, feeling smart, or feeling more independent (mastery goals).
35. To enhance interest on the task, the child can modify the way he is
doing the task so that the process feels less repetitive and boring. For
example, the child can switch from cursive writing to script, or he can
turn the task into a game. I know of one child that, to persist in
completing long division problems rewards himself five tokens for
accurate answers higher that ten thousands, and three tokens for
answers below ten thousands. Children are imaginative and creative,
so, they are not going to face much difficulty in finding alternative
and/or game-like ways to handle long and tedious tasks.
Environmental structuring, that is, modifying the environment to
reduce distractions. Simple modifications that can re-energize an
apathetic or unfocused child are changing the location, changing
seats, facing the desk towards the wall to avoid getting distracted,
taking a nap before studying, taking short breaks in-between tasks,
eating or drinking a food that will increase the level of energy, and/or
listening to music to become more attentive.
36. To shift the student’s locus of control from external (other people or
circumstances are in control) to internal (being in control of actions that lead
to academic improvement), follow the child’s interests and teach him how to
set task-focused self-goals. Help the child develop a short-term goal (the
child creates the goal or selects from a menu of goals) with a systematic
(step-by-step) plan and learning strategies for making progress towards the
goal. For example, the child can work on a goal like, “For the next fifteen
minutes, I am going to remain seated and working on my addition
problems.” Gradually, progress the child to goals that require more time, for
example, “By May 15, I will complete accurately three addition problems with
one renaming.”
Once children learn to develop self-goals, and they focus on strategies rather
than outcomes or performance, they are more likely to “own” the outcome
(Ames, 1990).
Make sure that the goal that the child selects is realistic, and that you provide
frequent feedback and teach alternative learning strategies to ensure
success.
37. References (Part 2)
1. Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation:What teachers need to know. Teachers
College Record, 91, pp. 409-421.
2. Burhans, K., & Dweck, C. S. (1995). Helplessness in early childhood:The
role of contingent worth. Child Development, 66, pp.1719-1738.
3. Seligman, M.E., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., & Gillham, J. (1995). The
optimistic child. NewYork: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Sutherland, K. S., & Singh, N. N. (2004). Learned helplessness and
students with emotional or behavioral disorders: Deprivation in the
classroom. Behavioral Disorders, 29(2), pp. 169-181.
5. Tollefson, N. (2000). Classroom applications of cognitive theories of
motivation. Educational Psychology Review,Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 63-83.
6. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom
experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, pp. 3-25.
7. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an
underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational
Psychologist, 38(4), pp. 189-205.
38. Connect with Psychoeducation for Teachers
Online
FACEBOOK PAGES AND
GROUPS
PSYCHOEDUCATION FOR
TEACHERS (Page)
https://www.facebook.com/psyc
hoeducationalteacher
FREE OR CHEAPTEACHING
RESOURCES (Page)
https://www.facebook.com/freer
esourcesforteachers/
WETEACHTHEWORLD (Group)
https://facebook.com/groups/22
2247571474300
BOOKS IN CHILD GUIDANCE
THE PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL
TEACHER
https://www.amazon.com/autho
r/thepsychoeducationalteacher/
39. Watch Your Language!
Ways ofTalking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code
To preview this book on Amazon, visit myAuthor Page (Books in Child Guidance)