17.04.2013 Views

Commonwealth Forestry Review

Commonwealth Forestry Review

Commonwealth Forestry Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><strong>Review</strong><br />

Vol. 50 (1), No. 143, March 1971<br />

PUBLISHED BY<br />

THE COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY AssoCIATION<br />

AT/THE ROYAL COMMONWEALTH SOCIETY, 18 NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE.<br />

LONDON, W.C.2.<br />

Price to Non-Menlbers £1.25 Net


THE COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION<br />

Incorporated by Royal Charter, November 1921, and by Supplemental Royal Charter, 1962<br />

At THE ROYAL COMMONWEALTH SOCIETY<br />

18 NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE, LONDON, W.C.2<br />

TELEPHONE: 01-930 7209<br />

Patron:<br />

tIER MAJESTY THE QUEEN<br />

President:<br />

HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH AND QUEENSBERRY, P.C., K.T., G.C.V.D.<br />

Vice-Presidents:<br />

SIR HARRY CHAMPION, C.I.E.<br />

E. BRYAN LATHAM, C.B.E., M.M.<br />

COLONEL SIR STUART MALLINSON, C.B.E., D.S.D., M.C., J.P.<br />

Past Chairmen:<br />

1921-22. THE RT. HON. VISCOUNT NOVAR, K.T., G.C.M.G., P.C.<br />

1923-24. COLONEL THE RT. HON. LORD COURTHOPE, M.C., P.C.<br />

1924-27. SIR JOHN STIRLING MAXWELL, Bt., K.T.<br />

.1927-32. SIR P. H. CLUTTERBUCK, C.I.E., C.B.E., V.D.<br />

1933-34. SIR JOHN STIRLING MAXWELL, Bt., K.T.<br />

1934-37. THE RT. HON. VISCOUNT STONEHAVEN, G.C.M.G., D.S.O., P.C.<br />

1938-54. THE RT. l-IoN. THE EARL OF CLARENDON, K.G., G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O., P.C.<br />

1954-59. THE RT. HON. LORD MILVERTON, G.C.M.G.<br />

1959-61. SIR HARRY CHAMPION, C.I.E.<br />

1961-64. E. BRYAN LATHAM, C.B.E., M.M.<br />

Chairman:<br />

SIR ARTHUR GOSLING, K.B.E., C.B.<br />

Vice-Chair/nan:<br />

PROFESSOR M. V. LAURIE, C.B.E.<br />

Hon. Treasurer:<br />

C. G. A. LATHAM<br />

Governing Council:<br />

ABOUL MAJID BIN HAJI MOHAMED SHAHID, PROFESSOR J. D. MATTHEWS (Britain)<br />

M.B.E. (Malaya) D. M. MBuRu (Kenya)<br />

S. A. ALEEM (Pakistan) A. M. OSENI (Nigeria)<br />

B. H. BEDNALL, C.B.E. (Australia) A. K. K. OWUSU-AFRIYIE (Ghana)<br />

F. G. BROWNE (Britain) T. A. OXLEY (Britain)<br />

SIR HARRY CHAMPION, C.I.E. (Britain) R. W. V. PALMER, D.B.E. (Britain)<br />

DR. D. A. N. CROMER A. L. POOLE (New Zealand)<br />

DR. H. C. DAWKINS, M.B.E. (Britain) S. D. RICHARDSON (Britain)<br />

J. A. DICKSON, C.B. (Britain) G. J. RODGER (Australia)<br />

L. E. Dow (Guyana) M. L. S. B. RUKUBA (Uganda)<br />

F. C. FORD ROBERTSON, O.B.E. (Britain) R. G. SANGSTER, C.B.E. (Britain)<br />

R. E. GROVES (Britain) E. J. SHRUBSHALL (Britain)<br />

J. D. B. HARRISON, D.C.M. (Canada) DEAN J. W. B. SISAM (Canada)<br />

S. L. KESSEL, M.B.E. (Australia) R. C. SONI (India)<br />

G. J. KILEO (Tanzania) DUNCAN STEVENSON, D.B.E. (Britain)<br />

A. F. A. LAMB, D.B.E. (Britain) C. SWABEY, C.M.G. (Britain)<br />

E. BRYAN LATHAM, C.B.E., M.M. (Britain) E. THORPE, O.B.E. (Britain)<br />

C. G. A. LATHAM (Britain) K. W. TRENAMAN (Br. Solomon Islands)<br />

L. S. LINDO (British Honduras) A. R. TRIST (Australia)<br />

W. E. M. LOGAN, D.B.E. (Britain) E. J. WARD (Canada)<br />

R. G. McKEE (Canada) G. WATKINS (Fiji)<br />

COLONEL SIR S. S. MALLINSON, C.B.E., G. WEBSTER, O.B.E. (Britain)<br />

D.S.O., M.C., J.P. (Britain) J. WYATT-SMITH (Nigeria)<br />

Editor and Secretary:<br />

E. W. MARCH, M.A.<br />

Auditors:<br />

W. M. CORMACK, e.A.• P. F. HERMON.


Rail, R.<br />

Waterer, R.R.<br />

Webster, F. V.<br />

Wilson, J. A.<br />

RESEARCH NOTES<br />

Australia<br />

Canada<br />

E.A.A.F.R.O.<br />

Nigeria<br />

United Kingdom<br />

REVIEWS-Books and Publications<br />

Aerial Photo-Ecology<br />

Afforestation in Arid Zones<br />

Australian Timber Handbook<br />

Bats of West Africa<br />

Bulletin of the Nigerian Forest Department 1969<br />

Developing a Better Environlnent...<br />

Evergreen Forests of Malawi<br />

Fast-growing Trees of the Lowland Tropics<br />

Fertiliser Treatment of Forest Trees<br />

Flora of Tropical East Africa<br />

Flora Zatnbesiaca ...<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> in Northern Ireland<br />

Industrial I-listory of Dean...<br />

Joinery<br />

La Foret<br />

Manual of the Forest Trees of Papua and New Guinea<br />

My Life My Trees ...<br />

Native Trees of Canada<br />

Planning Research for Resource Decisions<br />

Rodents of West Africa<br />

Standard Volume Tables for Coniferous Species of North West Pakistan<br />

Text Book of Soil Chemical Analysis<br />

Timber Frame House of England<br />

Trials of Exotic Tree Species in the Savanna Region of Nigeria<br />

Untersuching uber forstliche Konzessionen, Ein Beitrag Zur Forderung der Forstwirtschaft<br />

in den Entwicklungslandem<br />

World Timbers No. 3<br />

PAGE<br />

219<br />

216<br />

17<br />

218<br />

228<br />

28,230<br />

233<br />

31<br />

234<br />

REVmWS-Annual Reports<br />

British Columbia 1969 82<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Development Corporation-Report and Accounts 1970 287<br />

Division of Forest Products C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne 1968-69 284<br />

Division of Forest Products C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne 1969-70 83<br />

Eastern Rockies Forest Conservation Board 1968-69 and 1969-70 83<br />

Fiftieth Annual Report of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain 1969-70 78<br />

Forest Insect and Disease Survey, Canadian Forest Service 1969 285<br />

Forest Research Institute, New Zealand 1969 ... 80<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Victoria, Australia 1969-70 287<br />

Ghana Forest Products Research Institute, 1968 84<br />

Hong Kong 1969-70 286<br />

Kerala 1967-68 82<br />

Mauritius 1968 281<br />

Republic of Ireland 1967-68 85<br />

Republic of Zambia 1969 ... 280<br />

Rhodesia <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission 1968-69 ... 79<br />

South Africa 1969 ... 81<br />

South Australia 1968-69 286<br />

United Kingdom <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission Report on Research 1970 282<br />

United Republic of Tanzania 1968 283<br />

Wattle Research Institute, University of Natal, South Africa... 282<br />

West Malaysia 1967 86<br />

GOLDEN JUBILEE NUMBER<br />

Loyal Message and Reply<br />

His Grace The Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry<br />

Chairman's Foreword ...<br />

6<br />

279<br />

71<br />

274<br />

275<br />

78<br />

274<br />

276<br />

280<br />

271<br />

273<br />

76<br />

277<br />

270<br />

277<br />

74<br />

275<br />

77<br />

74<br />

273<br />

275<br />

76<br />

270<br />

277<br />

73<br />

76<br />

74<br />

89<br />

91<br />

92


Editorial<br />

Commonlvealth <strong>Forestry</strong> Association-A SO-year Retrospect<br />

Officers of the Association<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest Authorities and Institutions ...<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain<br />

India<br />

Pakistan<br />

Australia<br />

Canada ...<br />

New Zealand<br />

Northern Ireland<br />

Mrica<br />

Botswana<br />

Gambia<br />

Ghana<br />

Kenya<br />

Lesotho<br />

Malawi<br />

Nigeria<br />

Rhodesia<br />

Sierra Leone<br />

Tanzania<br />

Uganda<br />

Zambia<br />

Asia<br />

Ceylon<br />

Hong Kong ...<br />

West Malaysia<br />

Sabah...<br />

Sarawak<br />

Island Territories<br />

The Bahamas<br />

British Solomon Islands Protectorate<br />

Cyprus<br />

Fiji<br />

Mauritius<br />

Seychelles<br />

West Indies<br />

British Honduras<br />

Dominica<br />

Grenada<br />

Guyana<br />

Jamaica<br />

St. Lucia<br />

Trinidad and Tobago<br />

Former <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Territories<br />

Palestine<br />

South Africa<br />

Sudan<br />

British Universities-Department of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Oxford<br />

Aberdeen<br />

Bangor<br />

.Edinburgh<br />

Calnbridge<br />

Forest Products Research Laboratory, Princes Risborough<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Advisers<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences<br />

Forty-Ninth Annual General Meeting<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

7<br />

PAGE<br />

93<br />

94<br />

101<br />

104<br />

105<br />

108<br />

113<br />

115<br />

123<br />

130<br />

134<br />

136<br />

136<br />

136<br />

138<br />

139<br />

139<br />

141<br />

143<br />

144<br />

145<br />

147<br />

148<br />

150<br />

151<br />

151<br />

153<br />

155<br />

156<br />

156<br />

156<br />

157<br />

159<br />

159<br />

160<br />

161<br />

161<br />

162<br />

163<br />

164<br />

164<br />

166<br />

167<br />

168<br />

170<br />

172<br />

173<br />

175<br />

176<br />

178<br />

181<br />

183<br />

184<br />

188


Editorial<br />

Section I<br />

List of Members<br />

Section 11<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest Departments<br />

Australia<br />

Bahamas<br />

Botswana<br />

British Honduras<br />

British Sololnon Islands<br />

Brunei<br />

Canada<br />

Ceylon<br />

Cyprus<br />

Dominica<br />

Fiji<br />

Gambia<br />

Ghana<br />

Great Britain<br />

Grenada<br />

Guyana<br />

Hong Kong ...<br />

India<br />

Jamaica<br />

Kenya<br />

Lesotho<br />

Malawi<br />

Malaysia<br />

Mauritius<br />

New Hebrides<br />

New Zealand<br />

Nigeria<br />

Northern Ireland<br />

Pakistan<br />

Rhodesia<br />

St. Helena<br />

St. Lucia<br />

Seychelles<br />

Sierra Leone<br />

Singapore<br />

Swaziland<br />

Tanzania<br />

Trinidad and Tobago<br />

Uganda<br />

Zambia<br />

HANDBOOK NUMBER<br />

Section III<br />

Departments and Institutions Concerned with <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Section IV<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> and Allied Societies of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

Section V<br />

Foreign and International <strong>Forestry</strong> Organisations<br />

Printed by Oxley & Son (Windsor) Ltd., 2-4 Victoria Street, Windsor, Berks.<br />

PAGE<br />

289<br />

290<br />

322<br />

326<br />

326<br />

326<br />

326<br />

326<br />

326<br />

333<br />

333<br />

333<br />

334<br />

334<br />

334<br />

334<br />

338<br />

338<br />

338<br />

339<br />

342<br />

342<br />

343<br />

343<br />

343<br />

344<br />

344<br />

344<br />

345<br />

346<br />

347<br />

347<br />

347<br />

347<br />

347<br />

347<br />

348<br />

348<br />

348<br />

348<br />

348<br />

349<br />

350<br />

365<br />

372


c. E. LANE-POOLE<br />

CHARLES EDWARD LANE-POOLE first came to Australia in 1916 and for the next thirty<br />

years zealously applied his great talents to the advancement offorestry in that country,<br />

first on a State, and later on a Federal level.<br />

Arriving at a time when Australian forestry was still regarded in many quarters as<br />

little more than a mining operation, Lane-Poole played a prominent role in the fornlulation<br />

and acceptance of sound forest policies on which are based many of the<br />

great developments that have taken place since his retirement from official forestry<br />

in 1945.<br />

Although his n10st enduring contributions probably lie in the areas of forest policy<br />

and forestry education, Lane-Paole excelled in many other fields including the exploration<br />

and classification of tropical forests in Africa and New Guinea. He was an<br />

unconlmonly tough character whose non-appeasing attitudes to principles in which<br />

he believed at times brought him into sharp conflict with higher authority. Inevitably<br />

he suffered severe setbacks, but he never abandoned the goals he had set himself,<br />

and which in the end he generally achieved.<br />

Born in Sussex, England, in 1885, Lane-Paole received his early education in<br />

Dublin and his forestry training at the French <strong>Forestry</strong> School at Nancy. He went to<br />

South Africa in 1906 and after a year at the South African Forest School served until<br />

1910 as District Forest Officer in the Transvaal. He was then appointed Conservator<br />

of Forests, Sierra Leone, where he renlained until 1916, when he accepted the post of<br />

Conservator of Forests, Western Australia.<br />

In Africa he carried out extensive forest surveys and whilst engaged on this work was<br />

able to indulge his taste for living dangerously. He acquired a reputation for swimnling<br />

crocodile infested rivers, embarking on lone lion hunting expeditions, and capturing<br />

deadly tropical snakes alive. In the latter task he used to good effect the steel hook<br />

that served as a replacenlent for his nlissing left hand. In spite of his single hand he<br />

conducted all his surveys in Africa, and later in New Guinea, alone or with native<br />

bearers, and was very skilful in handling conlplicated survey and other field equipnlent.<br />

He was also an exoert horsenlan.<br />

Lane-Poole was recolnnlended for the position of Conservator of Forests in Western<br />

Australia by Sir David Hutchins who at that tinle occupied a senior forestry post in the<br />

Union of South Africa, and who had been invited to report on forestry 111atters, first<br />

in Western Australia and later in Australia as a ,vhole. Upon taking up his new position,<br />

Lane-Poole, with characteristic vigour, set about re-organising the functions of the<br />

f"orestry Department. One of his early achievements was the fashioning of the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Act, 1918, which gave that State the basis for a sound forest policy and provided for the<br />

dedication of State forests in perpetuity. This Act was to serve as a model for other<br />

States and still stands as a monument to his foresight and ability. He also itnplenlented<br />

a vigorous forest asseSSlnent and classification programme that soon revealed<br />

that fornler estitnates had grossly exaggerated the extent of the State's forest resources,<br />

thus giving even greater urgency to the need for the retention and proper Inanagement<br />

of those areas remaining.<br />

Deeply concerned with the lack of trained staff, he established a school for forest<br />

forenlan and rangers in Western Australia, and in collaboration with foresters in<br />

other States, campaigned vigorously for a National <strong>Forestry</strong> School to provide the<br />

highly trained professional staff of which Australia was desperately short. These<br />

latter endeavours were later to bear fruit with the establishment of the Australian<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> School.<br />

In 1921, Lane-Poole found himself at odds with the Governtnent of the day over<br />

its decision, taken against his advice, to extend concessions and leases held by a large<br />

private tilnber concern, and rather than implement what he considered to be an<br />

incorrect policy, he tendered his resignation. In view of his already considerable<br />

achievements and his high aspirations for the future of forestry in Western Australia,<br />

1


2 N R<br />

c. E. Lane-Poole<br />

this action stands as a highlight of the steadfastness and courage he displayed throughout<br />

his career.<br />

Following his departure from Western Australia, Lane-Poole was engaged by the<br />

COlnmonwealth Governlnent to report on the forest resources of the Territories of<br />

Papua and New Guinea, and during the next two years he carried out extensive solo<br />

explorations in isolated areas where tropical diseases and hostile natives were still<br />

considerable hazards. He endured great physical hardship and at various times was


c. E. LANE-POOLE 3<br />

badly stricken by Inalaria and tropical ulcers. He also had a calnp destroyed by natives<br />

and lost irreplaceable specimens and records as well as one of his native assistants.<br />

The diary notes appended to the comprehensive report he prepared at the end of the<br />

project provide a graphic account of his experiences and of the remote areas he<br />

traversed.<br />

In 1925, Lane-Poole was appointed Forest Adviser to the COlnnl0nwealth Governtnent<br />

and in that same year agreement was reached between the States and the COlnmonwealth<br />

on the establishment ofthe Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School. Although the University<br />

of Adelaide had maintained a School of <strong>Forestry</strong> since 1911, it had never been very<br />

well supported by the State forest services. Under the new arrangement the Comnl0nwealth<br />

agreed to establish, equip and staff a national <strong>Forestry</strong> School in Canberra,<br />

and the States for their part, agreed to support the School by nominating a yearly<br />

number of students more or less proportional to their respective needs. The various<br />

forest services and State universities were all to be represented on a Board of Higher<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Education which would supervise the academic standard of the forestry<br />

course in Canberra.<br />

In 1927, Lane-Poole becanle Inspector-General of Forests of the newly forlned<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau, and also acting Principal of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

School when it opened that year in Canberra. He continued in the latter post until<br />

1944 and retired as Inspector-General in February 1945.<br />

During his eighteen years as Inspector-General of Forests he worked tirelessly to<br />

promote the cause of forestry on a national level. Although the unequivocal stand<br />

he took on some issues was not always conducive to political harmony, his great<br />

ability and wide experience as a forester was fully recognised in forestry circles, and<br />

his collaboration in forestry problems peculiar to the States was frequently sought<br />

and readily given. As a strong protagonist of the need for a national forest policy for<br />

Australia he must have been gratified when, in 1964, an instrument capable of promoting<br />

such a policy at last came into being with the fornlation of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Council which cOtnprises Federal and State Ministers responsible for forestry.<br />

In his role as Principal of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School, Lane-Poole through his<br />

ability as an administrator and lecturer, and by the example ofhis own life and achievetnents,<br />

strongly influenced the students in his charge, and through them the future<br />

progress of Australian forestry. More than a hundred students graduated from the<br />

School during the period he was in charge, and many of his students still occupy<br />

senior positions in the forest services.<br />

Due to the difficult econonlic conditions of the late 1920s and early 1930s the<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> School had to operate on a very meagre budget. Facilities available to staff<br />

and students were limited and it is greatly to Lane-Poole's credit that he was able to<br />

maintain the high academic standards for which the school became well known. He<br />

always took a keen interest in the sporting and social activities of his young charges<br />

and spared no effort to make their sojourn at the school a Inenl0rable and satisfying<br />

experience.<br />

Lane-Poole was the author of more than fifty papers and articles covering both<br />

scientific and more general aspects offorestry. He also represented the COlnmonwealth<br />

Government at many international meetings and attended the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Conferences in 1920, 1923 and 1928. At the first Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held<br />

in London he proposed the resolution which led to the forlnation of the Empire<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Association.<br />

Following his retirement from official forestry in 1945, Lane-Poole was active for<br />

many years as a forestry consultant in Sydney. Failing health and advancing years<br />

finally brought an end to this last phase of his career and he died in Sydney on 22nd<br />

November, 1970, at the age of 85.<br />

Lane-Poole was one of the great pioneers of forestry in Australia whose guiding<br />

principle throughout his professional career is expressed in the motto of the Australian<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> School-Mihi Cura Futuri-I serve posterity.


COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Vol. 50 (1), No. 143, March 1971<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THIS IS the first number of the <strong>Review</strong> to be published in the Association's Golden<br />

Jubilee Year. As Editor we could use the occasion to enlarge on the accomplishments<br />

and on the future of the Association. This would be what is commonly known as<br />

"jumping the gun". We hope that during our Jubilee Year the virtues ofthe Association<br />

will be extolled by abler pens and tongues than ours. We propose to make this Editorial<br />

a simple appeal for support of the various activities arranged to mark our Jubilee Year.<br />

This would appear to be an ideal opportunity to revert to our President's remarks in<br />

his address to the 1970 Annual General Meeting. On that occasion he comlnented on<br />

the fact that our various functions were attended year after year by the same loyal<br />

supporters and asked ourselves as Secretary to make yet another appeal through the<br />

REVIEW for a larger attendance of younger 111enlbers. We therefore appeal to all those<br />

younger members who are based within easy travelling distance of London to make<br />

the effort and join that band ofloyal supporters referred to by our President. Attendance<br />

at the last three Annual General Meetings has hovered around the fifty mark. Looking<br />

through our membership list we feel this figure could easily be doubled if members<br />

will make the effort. We can assure any neWCOlners that they are certain to meet some<br />

oftheir contemporaries or colleagues or make the acquaintance ofothers they have only<br />

met "on paper".<br />

This year's Annual General Meeting wiIJ be held on Tuesday, 27th April and will<br />

be the important event of our Jubilee Year. At successive Annual General Meetings<br />

in recent years it has been customary to follow the business of the 111eeting with a talk<br />

or talks by one or more distinguished guest speakers. On the occasion of our Jubilee<br />

Meeting the intention is that the post-meeting talks will be of a domestic nature. Our<br />

Vice-Chairman, Professor M. V. Laurie, will review the history and accomplishments<br />

of the Association during the past half century. We ourselves will follow Professor<br />

Laurie with our views on the future of the Association leading the way to what we hope<br />

will develop into a conversazione with full participation from the floor. WiIJ all members<br />

who have any ideas or criticisms which may benefit the Association or illlprove the<br />

REVIEW please conle prepared to air their views.<br />

The actual anniversary date of the founding of the Association is 16th November.<br />

On or near that date it is proposed to hold a commemorative dinner in London provided<br />

sufficient support is forthcoming. Our records show that on the last occasion the<br />

Association arranged a formal dinner at the Connaught Rooms in 1939 no less than<br />

59 members attended, there were no ladies present. On this occasion ladies will be<br />

welcome as guests and it should not be difficult to exceed the former attendance, if we<br />

are to justify inviting one or more distinguished guests it is essential that we do.<br />

Please rally round


6 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Richard Willan and his wife have just returned from a tour of Malawi, Rhodesia and<br />

South Africa. Richard was Chief Conservator, Malawi (Nyasaland as it was then) from<br />

1947-61.<br />

A. Wo'ffsohn having completed his F.A.O. contract term in Korea has now accepted<br />

another F.A.O. assignment in Nicaragua. He does not say on what he will be engaged.<br />

Society of THE COUNCIL of the Society of American Foresters on 16th October,<br />

American 1970 unanimously elected Mr. F. C. Ford Robertson of Oxford,<br />

Foresters Honours England to Honorary Membership. Persons elected to this member-<br />

F. C. Ford ship grade must be: (1) nonforesters who have made outstanding<br />

Robertson and well-known contributions to forestry in America or abroad<br />

(statesmen, conservationists, and civic leaders); or (2) professional<br />

foresters of outstanding achievenlent who are not citizens of the United States, its<br />

possessions or Canada. This honour is shared by only 31 other living persons.<br />

Mr. Ford Robertson, a long-titne professional forester, has an outstanding record in<br />

international forestry. Beginning his professional career in the Indian Forest Service<br />

in 1924, he later served as Chief of Silvicultural Research for the United Provinces. In<br />

1947 he was appointed Editor-in-Chief of <strong>Forestry</strong> Abstracts. As an active member of<br />

the Joint Comnlittee on Bibliography and Terminology of the Food and Agriculture<br />

Organisation of the United Nations and the International Union of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research<br />

Organisations, he contributed substantially in developing the Oxford System of<br />

Classification of <strong>Forestry</strong> literature. From December, 1964 to February, 1970 he served<br />

as Editor-Director for the basic English-language version of the Multilingual <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Ternlinology.<br />

Director THE MINISTER of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has appointed<br />

Kew Gardens Professor John Heslop-Harrison, M.Sc., Ph.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.,<br />

F.R.S.E., M.R.LA., F.L.S., F.I.Biol. to succeed Sir George Taylor,<br />

D.Sc., F.R.S., F.R.S.E., F.L.S., V.M.H., as Director of the Royal Botanic Gardens,<br />

Kew. Professor Heslop-Harrison will take up his appointment on 1st June, 1971.<br />

Sir George Taylor, who was appointed in 1956, will retire on 31 st May, 1971.<br />

British Columbia F. s. MCKINNON has retired as Deputy Minister of Forests. He is<br />

Personnel Moves succeeded by J. S. Stokes. N. A. McRae has been appointed<br />

Assistant Chief Forester and in his forlller post of District Forester,<br />

Prince George District, is succeeded by W. Young.<br />

FORESTRY COMMISSION NEWS<br />

Chain-Saws and WE PUBLISH in full the following information sheet recently issued<br />

Vibration by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission. We recommend it for detailed study<br />

Syndrome by anyone responsible for employees likely to be affected:<br />

November 1970<br />

There is now sufficient evidence to show that most chain-saw operators begin to<br />

notice a form of vibration effect known as "white fingers" after they have regularly<br />

used a fixed handle chain-saw for two to five years, and that continued use of a fixed<br />

handle chain-saw leads to worsening effects of white fingers. This does not apply,<br />

however, to occasional users, who have not noticed the effect.


NOTES AND COMMENTS 7<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission has been investigating this problem for son1e time now<br />

with the help of British experts in medicine, ergonomics, engineering, sound and<br />

vibration, as well as studying reports and meeting experts from other countries.<br />

During this time, some chain-saw manufacturers have redesigned their saws to<br />

incorporate anti-vibration rubber or spring bushes between both the handles and<br />

the saw engine and cutting unit; these saws have very much lower vibration levels<br />

than the fixed handle saws. Criteria for safe levels of vibration acceptable to man<br />

have been produced for chain-saws with factors which allow for variation in duration<br />

of usage per day and for interruptions in working during the day. Most of the new<br />

anti-vibration chain-saws have vibration levels within, or close to, this criteria.<br />

Taking all this information into account, the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission is ofthe opinion<br />

that the spread of vibration effects can be halted (or prevented in the case of men<br />

who have not noticed white finger effects to date), if suitable anti-vibration saws<br />

are used by regular operators, subject to these operators also following certain<br />

techniques and personal disciplines when they are working.<br />

The guidance supplied by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission to these regular operators is as<br />

follows:<br />

The new anti-vibration saws are within safe levels of vibration, provided that<br />

five aspects ofsaw usage are also retnembered and carried out; these are:<br />

(1) Good techniques for felling, cross-cutting and debranching with lightweight<br />

saws include resting the saw as much as possible on the tree (or occasionally<br />

on your thigh); this means that some of the vibration is absorbed by the tree<br />

or the large n1uscles of your thigh. Holding the saw as lightly as possible, when<br />

it is at full throttle, without of course reducing effective control of the saw,<br />

will also reduce vibration absorbed into your hands.<br />

(2) Wearing chain-saw gloves spreads the grip over a larger area of your hand.<br />

(Four pairs per 1l1an should be provided so that a dry pair is available after<br />

each break.)<br />

(3) Good blood circulation to the arn1S and hands gives maxiInum protection to<br />

the flesh, nerves and bones in the hands, and this is achieved by warming up<br />

before starting the saw, and by wearing suitable clothing and gloves. This<br />

applies to the whole body, so wear extra clothing during breaks from cutting.<br />

(4) Sprockets, guide bars, and chains should be well maintained and chains should<br />

be correctly sharpened with the recommended clearance for the depth gauge.<br />

Poor maintenance increases vibration by as ll1uch as one-third of the normal<br />

level for the saw.<br />

(5) Every tin1e during which the saw is idling or stopped, gives your hands and<br />

arms a chance to recover frolll the temporary effects of vibration. The nlore<br />

evenly breaks in saw usage can be spread throughout the day, the less the risk<br />

of any disconlfort in your hands. Try to organise the stops for fuel, sharpening,<br />

meals, piling of timber or other work so that the saw is switched off for at least<br />

ten Ininutes as often as possible during the day, rather than a few, longer<br />

stoppages.<br />

Research will continue to validate the safe levels of vibration criteria, to further<br />

reduce vibration levels of saws and to find ways of alleviating the white finger<br />

effects.<br />

Occasional users are recol11111ended to follow the five points listed, especially if<br />

they are using a fixed handle saw.<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission plan to change over completely to anti-vibration<br />

saws by theend of 1971.<br />

25 SavileRow,<br />

London WIX 2AY.<br />

* * * * * * *


Eucalyptus<br />

Coppice for<br />

Chip Material<br />

NOTES AND COMMENTS 9<br />

Satisfactory experiments in the use of this chemical have recently been carried out<br />

at Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. Full details have been written up by J. E.<br />

Brown, Research Officer, Department of Fisheries and <strong>Forestry</strong>, Petawawa Forest<br />

Experiment Station, Chalk River, Ontario.<br />

EXTRACT FROM Forest Products Newsletter No. 376, e.S.I.R.O.,<br />

Melbourne:<br />

With the increasing consumption of wood fibre for the production<br />

of paper, paperboard, fibreboard, and particleboard,<br />

more serious attention is being paid throughout the world to the growing offibre as a<br />

short-rotation crop. There is rising interest in the planting of quick-growing tree<br />

species, the application of fertilizer and irrigation techniques, the utilization of parts<br />

of the tree other than the merchantable bole, and the increased use of waste and<br />

residue material.<br />

Under appropriate conditions eucalypts are capable of rapid growth and can<br />

produce exceptional yields. Many species are able to regenerate by coppicing and the<br />

increment of coppice shoots is higher than that of trees grown from sowing or<br />

planting.<br />

The Division of Forest Products is particularly interested in this problem, and<br />

during 1969 commenced an investigation into the possibilities of using a coppicegrown<br />

eucalypt as a source of chip material. Eucalyptus viminalis was chosen for<br />

study because it has a wide distribution in south-eastern Australia, coppices readily,<br />

and exhibits marked genetic variation.<br />

New Zealand - G. S. BROWN, Local Honorary Secretary, New Zealand, reports<br />

A New <strong>Forestry</strong> plans for the publication of a new journal, New Zealand Journal<br />

Publication of<strong>Forestry</strong> Science, the first number of which is expected to appear<br />

in mid 1971. It will be edited and produced by the Forest Research<br />

Institute, Rotorua. It will be available for a wide range of forestry subjects and to<br />

contributors from the Forest Service, other Government Departments, and industry.<br />

Contributions for the first issue should be submitted by 31 January, 1971 to The Editor,<br />

New Zealand Journal of <strong>Forestry</strong> Science, Forest Research Institute, Private Bag,<br />

Rotorua.<br />

V.A.C.O. DURING THE past few years many items of interest have appeared<br />

Timber <strong>Review</strong> in these columns covering new uses of tropical timbers and in<br />

particular the lesser known or secondary hardwoods of West<br />

Africa. V.A.C.O. Timber <strong>Review</strong> No. 19 published in December gives further information<br />

on the various items already covered. This booklet also reprints a thoughtprovoking<br />

article by Dr. H. C. Dawkins:<br />

The Future of Industrial Cellulose: Unlimited or End in Sight? Not all will<br />

agree with Dr. Dawkins, at the same time his theory commands respect and is<br />

deserving of detailed examination.<br />

This booklet is available from United Africa (Timber) Ltd., United Africa House,<br />

Blackfriars Road, London, S.E.l.<br />

Brachystegia UNITED AFRICA co. (TIMBER) LTD. say that of the less well known<br />

Substitute species of hardwoods that they are currently evaluating in West<br />

for Oak Africa and at Holmes (Wragby) Ltd., Wragby, Lincs., they regard<br />

the species okwen as a most promising example. Although it is<br />

not in the tradition of beautiful woods which many regard as the hallmark of West<br />

African timbers, nevertheless they see a place for it as a substitute for oak.<br />

2


10 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

They are backed in this thinking by the Forest Products Research Department at<br />

Ibadan and the Nigerian Timber Association who have published the following strength<br />

and weight comparisons to show its suitability as an oak substitute:<br />

Weight Max. Compression Modulus Hardness<br />

at 12 bending parallel of side<br />

per cent. to grain elasticity grain<br />

Ib./sq. in. Ib./sq. in. X J031b./ lb.<br />

M.C. sq. in.<br />

I<br />

Okwen ... ... ... 42 14,400 7,940 1,640 1,430<br />

European oak ... ... 43 13,300 7,210 1,590 1,230<br />

Teak ... ... ... 43 14,300 8,320 1,850 1,130<br />

Scots pine ... ... 32 12,000 6,640 1,560 680<br />

Okwen (Brachystegia spp.), was formerly regarded by Nigerian foresters as a<br />

nuisance tree occupying a far greater area than its value justified. We do however,<br />

remember a particularly fine log being sawn into two-inch planks which were later<br />

manufactured into church pews and donated to a local church by the firln of Messrs.<br />

Brandler and Rylke then operating in Eastern Nigeria (circa 1960).<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> AS REPORTED in the December <strong>Review</strong> the <strong>Forestry</strong> Association<br />

Association of of Nigeria was duly founded at 'an Inaugural Conference in<br />

Nigeria Ibadan on 6th-9th October, 1970.<br />

The conference was held at the Conference Centre, University<br />

of Ibadan and was a great success. There were over 200 people at the formal opening<br />

which was performed by Mr. F. H. E. Brisibie, Commissioner of Police, on behalf of<br />

His Excellency Brigadier R. A. Adebayo, Military Governor of the Western State of<br />

Nigeria. A copy of His Excellency's opening speech is attached. (See "Around the<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong>.")<br />

At the General Meeting following the opening ceremony the formal resolution to<br />

form the <strong>Forestry</strong> Association of Nigeria was proposed by Chief H. A. Akinloye and<br />

seconded by Mr. J. L. Ladipo to general acclaim, and the Constitution was adopted.<br />

The following were elected into the offices of the Association:<br />

Office Name<br />

President Mr. J. L. Ladipo, Chief Conservator of Forests, Western<br />

State, Ibadan.<br />

1st Vice-President MaIlam Musa Daggash, Chairolan of the Federal Tenders<br />

Board.<br />

2nd Vice-President Chief M. I. Agbontaen, Vice-President, Nigerian Tinlber<br />

Association.<br />

Secretary Mr. J. F. Redhead, F.A.O. Liaison Officer and Ag. Head,<br />

Department of<strong>Forestry</strong>, University oflbadan.<br />

Asst. Secretary Mr. A. O. Adekunle, Conservator of Forests, Western State,<br />

Ibadan.<br />

Treasurer Mr. J. O. Ebuade-Iyamabo, Conservator of Forests, Mid-<br />

Western State, Benin City.<br />

Editor Mr. C. F. A. Onochie, Chief Planning Officer, Federal Department<br />

of<strong>Forestry</strong>, Ibadan.<br />

Memory Lane MANY OF our members who served in Nigeria would have been<br />

in Nigeria present in Ibadan when D. R. Rosevear, first and last Inspector-<br />

General of Forests, to mark his retirement from the post (1954),<br />

planted an Obechi tree. That tree was featured in the 1970 Christmas card issued by<br />

the Federal Department of Forest Research. Rosevear and his contemporaries will be<br />

interested to know that this tree of perfect form would appear to be approximately<br />

100 foot in height and 6 foot b.h.g. Perhaps Ibadan will let us have the exact figures.


NOTES AND COMMENTS 11<br />

D.S.I.P. ACCORDING TO the General Manager of Lever's Pacific Timbers,<br />

Log Shipments Mr. M. Collins, over one hundred thousand cubic feet oflogs (more<br />

to Australia than one million superficial feet) was shipped recently from<br />

Kololnbangara to Australia on the Kokusei Maru. This is<br />

understood to be the largest single shipment of logs yet made to Australia from the<br />

Solomons, or from PapuajNew Guinea. They are to be used mainly in plywood<br />

manufacture in Brisbane and Sydney.<br />

Considerable publicity, including television coverage and an article in the Australian<br />

Financial <strong>Review</strong>, was given to the arrival of the logs. They are being supplied at<br />

cheaper prices than similar tropical hardwood logs from Sabah, and it is hoped that<br />

this shipment will lead to considerable expansion oflog exports to Australia.<br />

Mr. K. W. Trenaman, the Conservator of Forests, comments that a number of small<br />

shiplTIents has previously been nlade to Australia, New Zealand and other countries,<br />

but that Japan has been, and is expected to remain, the largest buyer of timber from<br />

the Solomons. However, if a second large market in Australia can be secured, this will<br />

be a Inost welcollle and important development.<br />

Association WE ARE indebted to Mr. G. J. Pleydell of United Africa Company<br />

Technique (Timber) Limited for a report on the A.T.I.B.T. Autumn Meeting<br />

Internationale Des in Paris. Although sonlewhat lengthy we publish it in full as it<br />

Bois Tropicaux contains nluch of importance to tropical foresters and all concerned<br />

with tropical hardwoods:<br />

The autumn meeting of the Association Technique Internationale des Bois<br />

Tropicaux was held in Paris on 27th and 28th October, 1970 at the Centre Technique<br />

du Bois, under the chairnlanship of Mr. Peche, General President, assisted by<br />

Mr. Catinot, General Secretary.<br />

Men belonging by profession to the various sectors concerned with tropical<br />

timber in all its aspects-production, marketing, utilisation-representing 15<br />

out of the 20 countries which are Inembers of the A.T.I.B.T., took part in the work<br />

of the various Commissions and studied the problems set before them.<br />

In opening the meeting Mr. Peche thanked the Centre Technique du Bois and its<br />

Director, Mr. Collardet, for their renewed hospitality in offering the Association<br />

a place in which to hold its nleetings and expressed pleasure at seeing the particularly<br />

large nUlnber of participants.<br />

The work of the COlnmissions then proceeded in the order that had been adopted.<br />

ComlTIission V, responsible for the grading and seasoning of tropical timber and<br />

under the chairmanship of Mr. CoIlardet, first examined the circumstances in<br />

which a delTIonstration of the methods of grading rough logs and sawn timber from<br />

the Far East might be organised.<br />

It then studied how the tropical sawn timber market might be affected by Great<br />

Britain's request that the use of British measurements in commercial transactions<br />

be abandoned in favour of the metric systerTI and, in the case of sawn timber, in<br />

favour of new sizes of sawn pieces.<br />

The finishing touches were put to a list of currently used tropical species that<br />

are susceptible to attack by clean pin holes.<br />

The commercial grading of varieties of Meranti continued to be studied and a<br />

report was finally made on the progress achieved with the multilingual dictionary<br />

giving the terminology of defects.<br />

Commission Ill, entrusted with transport and handling matters and presided over<br />

by Mr. Wood, first dealt with the problem of parcelling sawn timber; in this<br />

connection harmonisation of the rules adopted by the various Shipping Line Conferences<br />

would be desirable. It then listened to a report by Mr. R. C. Roberts of<br />

Palm Line Limited on the future trends in the maritime transport of timber, the<br />

types of ships required for timber and the cost of freight.


12 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

The Chairman of Palm Line Limited, Mr. D. J. Nielson was also present at the<br />

meeting. During the discussion that followed Mr. R. C. Roberts's itnportant address,<br />

the Commission stressed the significant part played by freight and its cost in the<br />

tropical timber trade.<br />

Within the framework of Commission VII, presided over by Mr. Gimon and<br />

responsible for relations with the international organisations and research bodies,<br />

Mr. Erfurth of the Food and Agricultural Organisation gave an account of the<br />

activities of the F.A.O. in the forestry and timber sector. Mr. Catinot then reported<br />

on the forest inventories that had been carried out in tropical Africa, the inventories<br />

being carried out and planned, their special features and the results that might be<br />

expected by men in the trade. They were particularly concerned that these results<br />

should be expressed as a volume of marketable timber.<br />

In the course of the discussion of the work of Commission IV (Contracts and<br />

Usages), under the chairmanship of Mr. Hoornaert, two important exchanges ofview<br />

took place. The first related to the possibility of a consignment being refused in<br />

the event of a delivery of timber inferior to the quality specified in the contract; the<br />

Commission adopted a usage which applies on the one hand to the types of contract<br />

generally used in English-speaking countries and on the other hand to the A.T.I.B.T.<br />

standard contracts used on the European continent. The second exchange of views<br />

related to the drafting ofan arbitration clause which the A.T.I.B.T. standard contracts<br />

and the contracts in use in English-speaking countries might have in common;<br />

considerable progress was made in this direction.<br />

Commission VI (Use of tropical timber), presided over by Mr. Roth, first heard<br />

a report by Mr. Morellet of the Centre Technique Forestier Tropical (C.T.F.T.) on<br />

the enquiry carried out among members of the A.T.I.B.T. on Aniegre. This enquiry,<br />

which made it possible to define the problems posed by the use of this species, may<br />

serve as a model for the enquiries regarding other species that are not yet well known.<br />

A report by Mr. PoH, Assistant Director of the Centre d'Information et de Documentation<br />

du Batiment (Building Information Centre), gave rise to a very interesting<br />

discussion on the means to be adopted to give buyers and users a better knowledge<br />

of tropical species.<br />

An address by Mr. Chardin (C.T.F.T.), together with a particularly significant film,<br />

on the use of high speed cinematography in examining the mechanism of rotary<br />

cutting greatly interested the listeners. This address and the reports by Mr. Bertrand<br />

(C.T.F.T.) on the competition between timber and plastics, by Mr. Poliquin, a<br />

professor at Laval University (Quebec, Canada), on the new prospects for the tropical<br />

timber market in the V.S.A., and by Mr. Gehain (INDUFOR) on the present<br />

position of Limba gave rise to interesting discussions on technical, economic and<br />

commercial problems.<br />

Commissions I and II, entrusted with information, statistical, publication and<br />

publicity problems, were under the joint chairmanship of Miss Morgand and<br />

Mr. Poutie. They considered the problems ofpublicising tropical species-problems<br />

which could perhaps be solved by a drive in collaboration with other organisationsand<br />

they decided to reprint the General Nomenclature of Tropical Timber.<br />

The Council of Management then ratified the proposals made by the various<br />

Commissions and recorded the membership of two new active members. After the<br />

report by the Treasurer, Mr. Vivier, who was heartily congratulated for his work<br />

in that office, the General President, Mr. Peche, closed the meeting by thanking<br />

the participants and expressing the wish that he might see them again in even<br />

greater numbers, if possible, at the spring meeting.<br />

At the end of this meeting, which was particularly fruitful and during which<br />

many problems concerning tropical timber had been thoroughly examined, the<br />

Federation Nationale des Importateurs, Negociants, Industriels, Commissionnaires<br />

et Exportateurs en bois exotiques, tropicaux et americains (National Federation<br />

of Far Eastern, tropical and American timber importers, merchants, industrialists,


Section 23,<br />

I.U.F.R.O.<br />

Meeting<br />

NOTES AND COMMENTS 13<br />

brokers and exporters) gave a highly successful and friendly cocktail party for the<br />

participants at the meeting and various French and international personalities in<br />

the trade.<br />

THE SECTION 23, Improvement of Forest Production (Silviculture),<br />

of the International Union of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research Organization met<br />

at Ljublijana, Yugoslavia, in early October. The resolution of the<br />

working group on virgin forest research emphasised the urgency of<br />

preserving primary forest areas in tropical developing countries. The working group<br />

on tropical silviculture decided on a work programme which is chiefly directed toward<br />

dissemination of information and improving contacts among researchers in the field of<br />

tropical silviculture and related subjects of tropical forestry.<br />

Ethiopia THE BRITISH OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION has agreed to<br />

provide the Government of Ethiopia with a team of three <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Advisers for a period of years.<br />

Christopher Swabey, after five years as Director of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Bureau in Oxford will lead the team. He has gone out to Addis Ababa, initially for a<br />

year. He will be accompanied by J. A. D. Jackson, formerly of Nigeria. A third British<br />

forester will join the team in the near future.<br />

Teak Project THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK has approved a technical assistance<br />

Indonesia programme requested by the Indonesian Government to study<br />

and prepare plans for the rehabilitation and development of<br />

Indonesia's teak industry in Central and East Java.<br />

This technical assistance is the Bank's first venture in the forestry sector, and is in<br />

line with the current Five-Year Development Plan of the Indonesian Government to<br />

improve the development and exploitation of the country's rich timber resources.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> in WE RECENTLY received a copy of the biography of Kim It Sung,<br />

North Korea Communist leader of North Korea. As tnembers will be aware<br />

Korea was occupied by the Japanese froln 1911 till 1945. An uneasy<br />

peace followed leading up to the Korean War 1950-53 which after United Nation<br />

intervention resulted in the division of the country along the 38th parallel into North<br />

and South Korea.<br />

As the Association is above politics we browsed through this very lengthy book<br />

and came up with the following references to forestry:<br />

"Imnlediately after liberation he had climbed the MoonsoobongHill and was<br />

greatly grieved looking over the hills and dales of the fatherland which had been<br />

completely denuded of trees by the plunderous Japanese imperialists during their<br />

long rule.<br />

He said at that time that tree-planting and afforestation must be undertaken<br />

large-scale.<br />

So he worked out a vast plan for afforestation and conservation, with river<br />

inlprovement, and guided the people to fulfil the plan wherever he went.<br />

In the northern half of the Republic, a plan to plant 880,000 jungbo with trees<br />

was carried out quickly after the war. Mountains that had been made bare by the<br />

long-drawn catastrophe of so many years of Japanese imperialism were clothed<br />

again with green garments for the first time in those more than 30 years".<br />

The above sounds a grand concept; if any members have contacts in North Korea<br />

we should welcome further infornlation. In the meantime we are making a direct<br />

approach to Pyongyang.<br />

(one hectare === 1.01 jungbo)


16 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Literature published after 1964<br />

It is hoped in future to film the catalogue in five year blocks. The first block,<br />

covering the period 1965-70, will be available in late 1971 and will incorporate and<br />

supersede the microfilm already published covering the period 1965-67/68.<br />

Author Catalogue of Literature published between 1934 and 1968-69<br />

About 150,000 cards on 28 reels, £196 plus package and postage.<br />

Orders should be placed with the Microfilm Units, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Oxford.<br />

Multilingual WE ARE RELIABLY informed that this publication is likely to appear<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> "any day now". As previously reported it will be distributed by<br />

Terminology W. Heffer & Sons Ltd., Hills Road, Cambridge and the Society of<br />

AmericanForesters, 1010 16thStreetN.W.,WashingtonD.C.,V.S.A.<br />

Annual General THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING will be held on Tuesday, 27th<br />

Meeting April. Agenda and invitation form are enclosed with this issue.<br />

Assuming the postal strike is over, members in the United Kingdo111<br />

should have not less than 5 weeks' notice. This being the Association's Jubilee Year<br />

the discussion after the business of the meeting will be devoted to the Association and<br />

its future.<br />

Autumn<br />

Meeting<br />

Jubilee<br />

Dinner<br />

NO VENUE has yet been fixed for the Autulnn Meeting. It will<br />

however, take place about mid-September. Details and invitation<br />

form will be issued with the June REVIEW.<br />

AS MENTIONED in the December REVIEW and in the Editorial in<br />

this number, it is hoped to hold a commemorative dinner in or<br />

about mid-November provided sufficient support is forthcolning.<br />

Members will find a notice in this number seeking advance inforJnation as to possible<br />

support.<br />

Revisi'on of THE DECEMBER REVIEW will be d'evoted to a revised version of<br />

Handbook the Handbook. A form inviting a]l individual members to send<br />

in any changes of address, designations e1tc. is enclosed with this<br />

number. If no reply is received it will be assumed there is no change. Forest<br />

Authorities, Research Organisations and Universities have been asked for details<br />

by individual letters.<br />

Postal Strike AS WE GO to press the strike is still with us. Thanks to our<br />

Postscript printers who have maintained an excellent courier service between<br />

London and Windsor there is every reason to believe this issue<br />

will appear on time.


OBITUARIES<br />

Major F. V. Webster, M.C. (1901-1969)<br />

FREDERICK VERNON WEBSTER was born at Mussorie in India, in 1901 where his father<br />

was serving in the army. After schooling in India he entered the <strong>Forestry</strong> College at<br />

Dehra Dun and on completion of his forestry training joined the Burma Forest Service<br />

in 1926. The outbreak of the war found hiln in northern Burnla and he made his way<br />

to India and volunteered for military service. His experience of the people and forests<br />

of Burma made him an invaluable member of "Z" force operating behind the Japanese<br />

lines and it was for his part in these operations that he was awarded the M.C. After<br />

the war he returned to Burma for a short while but changed conditions led him to seek<br />

employnlent elsewhere and in August 1948 he joined the North Borneo Forest Depart­<br />

Olent. He stayed in North Borneo for the remainder of his working life retiring to<br />

England in August 1960. Monty or Web as he was known to his friends was a keen<br />

and in his younger days skilled sportsman. His particular love was cricket, which<br />

he continued to play until shortly before his retirement and which he followed with<br />

enthusiasm whenever possible.<br />

Shortly after retiring he suffered from a severe coronary thrombosis and was forced<br />

to lead a quiet life in retirement at Westfield in Sussex. In 1963 he married Dorothy<br />

Mayor, who survives hinl and to whom we extend our deepest sympathy.<br />

rrhomas Valentine Dent (1909-1970)<br />

WE REGRET to announce the death ofT. V. Dent, l.F.S.(Retd.) who died while attending<br />

a council meeting of the Yorkshire Naturalists' trust at York University on 11 th<br />

April 1970, exactly a week after his retirenlent from the services of the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

COllll11ission.<br />

The youngest officer to join the Indian Forest Service, Dent canle to India in October<br />

1929 and spent his first five years as a junior officer in North Bengal and in the Sunderbans<br />

and was, incidentally, instrumental in routing a group of determined rhino<br />

poachers as well as a rogue rhino, at Jaldapara. Soon after, he became the Khedda<br />

Officer and operated extensively in the Chittagong forests which were literally the<br />

home of wild elephants. Subsequent two years' arduous life as the Divisional Forest<br />

Officer, Chittagong Hill Tracts nearly cost him his life, afflicted as he was by the ITIuch<br />

dreaded Black Water Fever, but through the dedicated nursing of Frank Dent he<br />

survived. Next, he spent a couple of years as an Assistant Silviculturist at Dehra Dun<br />

(1940-42) and during the brief span, managed to publish an important SiIvicultural<br />

bulletin. He was a competent field botanist and a complete naturalist.<br />

With the evacuation of the British froln Burma he was recalled to Chittagong<br />

to shoulder the onerous task of the supply of colossal quantities of timber to the<br />

ArnlY at the front line that the Division became. A few months before India gained<br />

independence, he went to England on leave for a well-earned rest, little apprehending<br />

that he was leaving this country for good! Subsequently, he was absorbed in the<br />

Service of the U.K., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission wherefrom he had retired only on 4th<br />

April, 1970.<br />

Dent had an enviable iron constitution; and about physical hardships he could never<br />

care less. He was a good sportsnlan, and his shooting was accurate. His bag included<br />

several tigers and panthers. Yet his rugged exterior concealed a very tender heart that<br />

was incapable of being rude. He was considerate to a fault and it was a common sight<br />

in the early hours of the morning, to see Dent dashing in a jeep down the strand with<br />

a load of Foresters bound for the embarkation point, some eight miles from Chittagong,<br />

for their voyage to Cox's Bazar-on the country's eastern border, to report for<br />

duty. But for his help the poor staff would have had to trudge the weary miles to the<br />

wharf as cabs were not to be had for love or money in war time.<br />

He had recently informed his old colleagues about his desire to visit North Bengal,<br />

filled as it was for him with nostalgic memories, on his way to Australia where his<br />

17


18 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

son has settled down. This makes the bereavement all the more poignant, to those<br />

here who looked forward to meeting him again. He had boundless love for this country<br />

and her people.<br />

To his widow, son and the three daughters, we offer our deeply felt condolence.<br />

K.C.R.C.<br />

John Alexander Fraser<br />

JOHN ALEXANDER FRASER was born in Ross-shire, Scotland, in 1909. He was brought<br />

up in the ways of country life and chose forestry as his career, obtaining the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Commission's Foresters Certificate at Benmore. In 1936 he arrived in Uganda to begin<br />

thirty years of unstinted service to forestry overseas, divided almost equally between<br />

Uganda and Tanzania.<br />

His senior officers soon found that Fraser set himself a high standard and over the<br />

years this was the hallmark of his work. Whatever the task, whether settling forest<br />

boundary disputes, collecting wild rubber as part of Uganda's war effort, managing<br />

large hardwood nursery and replanting schemes or taking charge of softwood planting<br />

under a taungya system, his alert and practical mind grasped the essentials and his<br />

energy and drive ensured that they were carried out, and carried out well.<br />

Fraser's capability and integrity made it natural that he should be one of the select<br />

band of Foresters in what was then Tanganyika to be promoted on merit to the rank<br />

of Assistant Conservator. It was in this grade and in charge of forestry in Tanzania's<br />

varied and exacting East Region that he finished his overseas service in 1966 and retired<br />

to Scotland. He died of a heart attack on 7th November, 1970.<br />

Far from being a stern perfectionist, Fraser enjoyed living and his many friends of<br />

several races will remember with affection his zest and cheerful companionship. He<br />

was a devoted husband and father and our sympathy goes to his widow and son and<br />

daughter in their great loss.<br />

R.G.S.<br />

Obituary Notices on R. R. Waterer and Dr. MacLagan Gorrie are unavoidably<br />

held over due to the postal strike.<br />

NEW MEMBERS<br />

CRACIUM, G. C. J., B.Sc., M.Sc., G.P.O. Box 589, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.<br />

ELLIS, D. S., M.B.E., B.Sc.For., Edgerton, 14 Hillhead, Bonnyrigg, Midlothian.<br />

GILMOUR, D. A., B.Sc.For., Dip.For., M.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Atherton, Queensland,<br />

Australia.<br />

HOWELL, B. N., M.A.(Cantab.), Spitchwick Manor, Poundsgate, Newton Abbot, Devon.<br />

JHA, B. C., B.Sc.(Hon.), A.I.F.C., Finnish Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland.<br />

MINCHIN, A. A. F., Dip.For.(Oxon.), Cruxfield House, Near Duns, Berwickshire.<br />

STEVENS, H. E., B.Sc.For., R,P,F,ffi C.E.T., 3554 West 22nd Avenue, Vancouver 8, British<br />

Columbia, Canada.<br />

STIRLING, Lt.Col. J. A., O.B.E., F.I.C.E., M.lnst.H.E., F.I.Arb., 31 Fordwich Road, Welwyn<br />

Garden City, Herts.<br />

WESTBROEK, H., B.Sc.F., RRI, Steeles East Toronto, P.O. Box 56, Milliken, Ontario, Canada.


AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 23 .<br />

the wide-spread use of timber preservation processes have helped a great deal to<br />

conserve the indigenous forests by making it possible to slow dow ntheir rate of<br />

depletion. Since 1946 the amount of timber cut from the "exotic" forests is estimated<br />

to have represented a saving of nearly 750,000 acres of indigenous forest, and" the use<br />

of preservative even more than that.<br />

The AucklandHerald of 10th October has quoted some of the sayings ofthe Minister<br />

of Land and Forests, Duncan McIntyre, which may be worth re-quoting here:<br />

"With their system of tapu, the Maoris introduced conservation."<br />

"There are large areas in New Zealand we should give back to God and we should<br />

apologise for the mess we have made ... even offer to help him repair the damage."<br />

"The politician is your mouthpiece; if you are interested in the environment, he<br />

must be."<br />

"Man is the most noxious animal ever introduced into New Zealand."<br />

"How many of you could still get more excitement out of... rain on a tin roof than<br />

the broadcast from Parliament ?"<br />

"Plant trees for your lives."<br />

"The battle-cry of conservation is good to hear, but would be even better if some<br />

of those shouting the loudest had a clearer idea of what they were shouting for."<br />

"People who love the land do not abuse it."<br />

"It is the wooing of the earth that we must aspire to."<br />

"We must reconcile two conflicting elements-taking enough profit from our land<br />

to give us a good living and protecting that same land to give us a good life."<br />

"We Kiwis can have a paradise here in our own land if we plan and if we are prepared<br />

to pay the price."<br />

NIGERIA<br />

Speech by His Excellency The Military Governor of The Western State<br />

To The <strong>Forestry</strong> Association of Nigeria on the occasion of its launching ceremony.<br />

DISTINGUISHED GUESTS, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,<br />

I am delighted to be in your midst this morning and to have the opportunity of<br />

addressing your inaugural meeting. I welcome each and everyone of you to Ibadan<br />

and wish you a happy stay here. I congratulate you heartily for forming this Association.<br />

It is my belief that it will offer a virile forum where forestry problems will be<br />

discussed and solved. I am certain you have a wealth of knowledge and very rich experience<br />

in tropical forestry that the outside world is eager to tap. It is through the<br />

journal of the Association, which I am informed you will start publishing soon, that<br />

these vital information and knowledge will be disseminated to the outside world.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> in this country today has entered a phase of intensive management. In the<br />

past your activities centred on acquiring the forest estate and protecting it. Now that<br />

you have the Estate, you are actively engaged in developing it to support the needs<br />

of the teeming population in this country. Because the products of the forests are<br />

intimately connected with the lives of the ordinary people you occupy a unique place<br />

in subscribing substantially to the general well being of the inhabitants of this country.<br />

The export of timber alone, I am told, earns about £7 million in foreign exchange every<br />

year and about ten times this value from a variety of minor forest products including<br />

wood carvings, palm oil and kernels, gum arabic, species, wild animals and animal<br />

trophies. A vital service which the forests render the ordinary village man and which<br />

we do not appreciate enough is the provision of herbs and barks for the preparation of<br />

native medicine. A good proportion of the population collects herbs and barks of<br />

trees for concoctions and medicinal preparations since the medical facilities are<br />

inadequate in these areas.<br />

It is gratifying to note that every State Government in the Federation has embarked<br />

upon extensive afforestation programmes. I am informed that you are employing the<br />

latest innovations and techniques in growing quickly timber that you will soon be<br />

called upon to supply industries in this country. In this connection I shall mention


24 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

the proposed establishment of pulp and paper mills in various parts of the country.<br />

You are aware of the colossal amount of money spent in importing paper and paper<br />

products into Nigeria yearly and I am happy to note that the Federal Government<br />

is committed to activating and establishing local paper industries to supply our<br />

demands of these products. My government is also raising 2,000 acres of Gmelina<br />

trees annually for a proposed Gmelina pulp mill. This mill and paper complex will<br />

provide some 36 million cement bags annually when fully established. I am pleased<br />

to learn that our Forest Services all over the country are planting large areas ofTropical<br />

Pines and other species which are most suitable for pulp manufacture.<br />

Other wood based industries also call for mention here. Two new plymill complexes<br />

are proposed for the West and Mid-West and these will open soon. The members of<br />

your association in the timber trade should now think more of integrated industrial<br />

complexes that will utilise every bit of wood available rather than engage in small<br />

scale sawmilling. Admittedly these sawmills are fulfilling a purpose in supplying sawn<br />

timber for the local market but the time has come when you should compete with<br />

others for the foreign markets.<br />

Vast quantities of processed wood and lumber are consumed locally every year.<br />

It will be incumbent on the members of your Association to find ways and means of<br />

meeting this demand and halt the annual importation of some £7 million worth of<br />

wood and wood products into this country. I am sure that if. you put constructive<br />

proposals to various governments of the Federation pointing out the urgency and<br />

merits attached to each proposal, this Association would be contributing tremendously<br />

to the economy ofNigeria.<br />

We are fortunate in this State to have had the benefit of advice and proposals of the<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Advisory Commission. My Government, as a result of the advice given by<br />

the <strong>Forestry</strong> Advisory Commission is striving to put forestry with the allied industries<br />

in its proper place and accord it top priority in the development programme.<br />

It is saddening to remark that our forests are continually being exhausted of the<br />

traditional mahoganies which had always given an identity of its own to this country<br />

in the timber markets abroad. I appeal to all States Forest Services, the University<br />

and the Research Institute to devise means of replenishing our forests with these valuable<br />

trees. They should not be left out of your gigantic reforestation programmes.<br />

We are approaching a stage, sequence to the depletion of large sized timbers,<br />

whereby we will have to content ourselves with using timbers of smaller dimensions.<br />

Your Association should now be seriously engaged in finding suitable machinery that<br />

will break trees from the thinnings of your plantations to utilisable forms. I have a<br />

feeling that some of these thinnings could find markets as building and construction<br />

materials.<br />

I am told that two States in the north have embarked on large scale game conservation<br />

programmes. This is a noble gesture since the development of game reserves will<br />

no doubt promote tourism and preserve rare animals which are currently on the verge<br />

of extinction. Game anitnals are said to contain better protein than domestic animals<br />

and cattle. I have a similar game conservation programme in this State. Two large<br />

game reserves both over 2,000 sq. miles in extent are being developed to conserve game.<br />

When fully developed the animals will be cropped to provide protein which is generally<br />

deficient in Nigeria's diets.<br />

It is often said that Agriculture is the "backbone" of this country's econOIUY but<br />

only few people ever thought that if agriculture is not sustained to grow, it will never<br />

develop a backbone. <strong>Forestry</strong> has sustained agriculture by helping to stabilise the soil<br />

and prevent erosion. In some parts of the country erosion has threatened lives and<br />

rendered large tracts of land useless. I have no doubt in my mind that the Forest<br />

Services in these areas are doing their best to contain the menace posed by erosion.<br />

Forests not only prevent erosion but they also offer protection to dairy animals.


AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 2S<br />

The University and the Research Institute which are, happily, members of this<br />

Association should work together with State Forest Services in solving their management<br />

and staffing problems. Problems will continually rear their heads as you go<br />

deeper into intensive forestry. Problems associated with the marketing ofour unknown<br />

timber species will be worth looking into. The University should provide facilities for<br />

training and servicing forestry personnel through the organising of special courses,<br />

seminars and symposia.<br />

I am happy this Association includes members of the timber trade. The need has<br />

always existed for the "growers" of wood and its "hewers" to work together and<br />

promote forestry in this country. The Forest Services must always have at the back of<br />

their minds the supply of the needs of the trade. They must strive to supply wood in<br />

the form acceptable to the trade. The members of the trade on the other hand must<br />

find suitable forms of use for the wood being grown. They must think of more<br />

sophisticated and modern methods of processing wood in order to minimise wastes.<br />

I have mentioned the establishment of integrated wood industries and the marketing<br />

of our unpopular timber species. I understand that the export of lumber is more<br />

advantageous than log export in that it is more profitable and less capital intensive.<br />

The need for providing employment locally is an added justification for advocating<br />

a policy involving the processing of timber before export.<br />

I have tried to touch on some of the immediate forestry problems that need tackling<br />

in this country. I have by no means exhausted them but I am sure you will be deliberating<br />

on these very fully in your sessions. I have mentioned the uniqueness of your<br />

association in projecting the image of forestry and forest industry in this country to<br />

the outside world. You have the pride of place of being the best organised association<br />

of this nature in the tropics and I hope you will feed factual information on Nigerian<br />

forestry to your counter-parts in other countries. I do hope you will meet regularly<br />

to exchange ideas and views of common interest.<br />

I know you have a heavy programme to go through and I shall leave you to carry<br />

on with your deliberations. Thank you.<br />

SABAH<br />

Logging in Forest Reserves in Sabah<br />

THE GOVERNMENT of the State of Sabah, Malaysia, recently announced that it has<br />

advised the 12 companies logging under 21 year licence agreements in forest reserves<br />

that these agreements will not be renewed when they expire. The licence agreements<br />

of 8 of the companies, which are private, will expire at the end of 1978 while those of<br />

the other 4 which are public including Sabah Timber Co. (formerly British Borneo<br />

Timber Co.) will expire later-the final one at the end of 1984. The total annual coupe<br />

of the 12 companies, which are working on a theoretical sustained yield basis, is 73 sq.<br />

miles with the coupe equal to one hundredth of the total concession area. In addition<br />

a new licence agreement is being concluded with a foundation established by enactment<br />

called The Sabah Foundation, which will have an annual coupe of 30 sq. miles divided<br />

into 10 sub coupes. It is not certain when this will come into force but probably before<br />

the end of 1970.<br />

The reason for the issue of this licence agreement is basically to try and distribute<br />

the profits from the timber industry more evenly among the people. With this end in<br />

view the Sabah Foundation proposes to provide funds and facilities for education,<br />

housing and other projects for the benefit of the peoples of Sabah. At the same time<br />

it hopes to invest in the exploitation and development of other natural resources in<br />

the State in particular oil and minerals.<br />

Forest Inventory: Sabah<br />

A FOREST INVENTORY is at present being carried out in Sabah under a Canadian aid<br />

programme. The inventory is divided into three phases. Phase I is the provision of<br />

3


26 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

suitable aerial photography of the whole State, phase II is the physical inventory of<br />

the forests and phase III is an economic evaluation of the data obtained froIn phase 11.<br />

Forestal <strong>Forestry</strong> and Engineering International Ltd. are responsible for the work<br />

with Hedlin-Menzies and Associates participating in phase Ill. Phase I commenced<br />

towards the end of 1969 and phase II early in 1970 while phase III will start towards<br />

the end of 1970. It is hoped to have all field work completed by the end of 1971 and the<br />

final report presented by mid 1972.<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute<br />

Contributed by Dr. H. C. Dawkins, January 1971.<br />

THE C.F.I. is familiar by name to all <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forest authorities but its status<br />

and activities are often not so clear, except to those who frequently work with it. We<br />

hope to include news of these activities regularly in future, in all or most numbers of<br />

this REVIEW.<br />

Pirstly to clarify its status. The C.P.I. is simply the building-much of it furnished<br />

with timber donated by the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-which houses the University Department<br />

of <strong>Forestry</strong>. Among the research and advisory teams within this Department is one<br />

which was set up as a result of the last two <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences,<br />

on finance supplied by 25 <strong>Commonwealth</strong> GovernInents. This teanl works mainly on<br />

problems for which help has been requested by contributing Governments, but is also<br />

working on projects of general interest to all forest authorities such as seed source,<br />

eugenics and yield appraisal of pantropically fast-growing species, data processing and<br />

statistical analysis of inventory and experiment.<br />

Recently for instance R. H. Kemp has collected seed from 28 carefully selected<br />

provenances of central American pines, and while this goes to press he is again in<br />

that area selecting and collecting more. Previous expeditions by Kemp, E. N. G.<br />

Cooling, A. P. A. Lamb and J. Burley have led to a series of international provenance<br />

trials; plans for the latest series have been sent to 39 forest authorities. P. J. Wood<br />

initiated greenhouse trials and electron microscope studies at Oxford to facilitate<br />

early recognition ofhigh quality genotypes. He also visited nine West African countries<br />

to study their species and provenance trials, many of which use seed collected and<br />

plans designed by the Oxford team. Lamb visited India and Ceylon to advise on the<br />

same topic, along with nursery technique and numerous local silvicultural difficulties.<br />

Burley and I. A. Andrew on the genetics and biometric side worked with J. F.<br />

Hughes (University lecturer in wood anatomy) on anatomical variation of Pinus<br />

caribaea collected from several sources, they also published their previous work on<br />

P. khasya, P. merkusii and P. pa/ufa from southern-central Africa. Burley also visited<br />

six countries from eastern to southern Africa to advise on tree introduction and<br />

breeding strategies, with particular reference to the help that C.F.I. might be able to<br />

give. Andrew is developing new techniques of multivariate analysis for the genetical<br />

and wood quality data now coming in from several countries; for example, international<br />

provenance trials of Cedrela odorata and P. merkusii designed by the C.F.I.<br />

team and established in 20 countries are now under analysis.<br />

P. G. Adlard of the Statistical and Computing Section completed his analysis of<br />

the Southeast Johor inventory, and developed from it an ALGOL procedure for<br />

dealing with any future polyspecific inventory. He also completed increment analyses<br />

for 134 Uganda "THP-" sample-plots and for 60 similar but more complex plots in<br />

Sabah. Another new development was a computer simulation of a four-hectare stand<br />

of Malawi pines, for the study of sampling efficiency and its dependence on pattern<br />

of variation in such stands. With T. J. Wormald the section contructed volume tables<br />

for P. halepensis (Cyprus), P. caribaea and P. oocarpa (British Honduras), Ocotea<br />

usambarensis (EAAFRO), Cupressus, Juniperus, Eucalyptus and P. radiata (Kenya).<br />

An ALGOL program was written by B. W. Dawkins to depict all future volulne


AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 27<br />

equations as graph-plus-scatter diagrams, to supplement the traditional tables. The<br />

same worker also re-designed the polyspecific sample-plot program in FORTRAN,<br />

so as to make this facility more widely available. It was put to immediate use for<br />

Sarawak swamp forests where some 20 plots await analysis. On average, the section<br />

processes about 20 "runs" on the computer per day, the average job (e.g. volume tables<br />

for a single species) taking perhaps five "runs" to complete.<br />

B. T. Styles as Forest Botanist has continued to advise the Institute's Fast Growing<br />

Tropical Timber Section on the more fundamental botanical aspects of its work, that<br />

is mainly the distribution, systematics and nomenclature of tropical pines and broadleaved<br />

trees. As a contribution towards helping in tree-breeding he is co-operating<br />

\vith the Silviculturist in charge of Tree Improvement in Nigeria (formerly in Ghana)<br />

to study phenology and the biology of flowers and fruits of Triplochiton, Terminalia<br />

and Cedrela and other species of Meliaceae. Styles has continued his study of<br />

chromosome cytology in important timber species of Meliaceae and his many new<br />

observations have been incorporated in a review of existing knowledge. At the request<br />

of the V.S. Forest Service he has begun to investigate the morphological and cytological<br />

variations of the three species of Swietenia and the putative hybrid between<br />

s. macrophylla and S. mahagoni. This hybrid is being more and more frequently<br />

lnentioned in the literature, but adequate botanical evidence is still lacking.<br />

3*


RESEARCH NOTES<br />

CANADA<br />

Rooting Plain and Heel Cutting of Spruce, Ronald M. Girouard, Forest Research<br />

Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and <strong>Forestry</strong>. Quebec.<br />

IN FOREST genetics studies, clonal testing is an important method for the evaluation<br />

of hybrid trees and parental stock. Because a clone consists of all individuals which<br />

have arisen by asexual reproduction from a common ancestor without significant<br />

visible somatic mutation, clonal testing must begin with vegetative propagation.<br />

This method permits the multiplication and preservation of valuable germp!asm.<br />

The propagules in clonal banks can be checked to determine whether or not<br />

certain characteristics are due to environmental factors or to genotype. It is also<br />

possible to establish seed orchards for the production of forest tree seed of tested<br />

stock.<br />

Two forms of vegetative propagation are commonly used in forestry improvement<br />

work: grafting and rooting of cuttings. Grafting may yield rapid results, but<br />

can also be disappointing when incomp,atibility symptoms, not immediately<br />

apparent, sho:w up in trees several years old. Altho'ugh rooting of cuttings eliminates<br />

the e'ffects of incompatibility, other problems exist such as differences in the rooting<br />

ability of cuttings taken from different species or from different trees of the<br />

same species. Most conifers and many of the hardwoods are considered difficult<br />

to root especially from shoots of relatively old or mature trees.<br />

In 1967, my work in Eastern Canada began with a study of adventitious root<br />

formation in stem cuttings of four species of spruce, a difficult-to-root genus as<br />

far as cuttage is concerned. Efforts were made to root, in a greenhouse under intermittent<br />

mist, cuttings with and without a heel of old wood and frequently from<br />

different positions on plantation-grown trees or ortets; the results of this preliminary<br />

work are reported herein.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> of literature<br />

Grade (5) studied the relationship between the position of shoots and the rooting<br />

of cuttings in material collected from an 18-year-old Picea abies tree. Forty-eight<br />

per cent of the cuttings from the up'per third portion of the crown rooted, while<br />

86 per cent of those from the lower third rooted. Root length was greatest and<br />

survival highest in cu:ttings taken from the lower-most part of Norway spruce<br />

trees (6), although the num'ber of roots formed was the same for both categories.<br />

Deuber 1 worked with 26- and 40-year-old trees of P. abies and noted that lateral<br />

branches rooted well.<br />

For winter cuttings of Norway spruce, Deuber and Farrar (2) and Farrar (3) 1939<br />

found that shoot tips with a basal cut were superior to those with a heel of old<br />

wood. Resin was thought to protect the wounded surfaces from bacteria and fungi.<br />

Two years later Farrar and Grace (4) added that plain cuttings of the same plant<br />

species root better than heel cuttings on the basis of p'ercentage rooted and number<br />

and length of roots. For summer collections, heels on the cuttings favoured survival<br />

and rooting in sand, and root length in sand plus peat. In several experiments<br />

involving early spring collections with sand as the rooting medium, the presence<br />

or absence of heels had little effect on rooting. Other plant propagators preferred<br />

cuttings with a cut above the base of the youngest shoots (10, 13), but many continue<br />

to insist on the necessity of using cuttings with a heel of wood or full-length<br />

cuttings with remnant bud scales attached at the base (7,8,9,11,12).<br />

Materials and methods<br />

In June, 1967, branches 'were collected from black spruce [Picea m.ariana (Mill.)<br />

B.S.P.], Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.], red spruce [Picea rubens Sarg.],<br />

and white spruce [Pieca glauca (Moench) Voss.] trees growing in plantations at<br />

28


RESEARCH NOTES<br />

5. GRACE, N. H. 1939. Vegetative propagation of conifers. I. Rooting of cuttings taken<br />

from the upper and lower regions of a Norway spruce tree. Can. J. Res. 17 (Sect. C):<br />

178-180.<br />

6. GRACE, N. H. and M. W. THISTLE. 1940. Vegetative propagation of conifers. V. The<br />

effect of indolylacetic acid and nutrient solutions on the rooting of Norway spruce<br />

cuttings. Can. J. Res. 18 (Sect. C): 122-128.<br />

7. KRUSSMANN, G. 1966. La pepiniere. Vol. I. La multiplication des arbres, arbustes et<br />

conifers. La Maison Rustique, Paris. p. 327.<br />

8. LARSEN, C. M. 1946. Experiments with softwood cuttings of forest trees. Forstl.<br />

F orsogsv. Danmark. 17: 289-443.<br />

9. LARSEN, C. M. 1955. The seasonal variation in the natural rooting capacity of<br />

cuttings of Norway spruce and Sitka spruce. Z. Forstg. Forstpflanzenzuchtung 4:<br />

69-80.<br />

ID. OLIVER, R. W. and S. H. NELSON. 1958. Propagation of spruce from cuttings. Proc.<br />

Plant Prop. Soc. 7: 41-43.<br />

11. PEDERSEN, J. 1965. Propagation from cuttings of Picea pungens "Glauca Globosa."<br />

Proc. lilt. Plant Prop. Soc. 15: 207.<br />

12. SAVELLA, L. 1965. Propagation of Picea pungens glauca cultivars. Proc. Int. Plant<br />

Prop. Soc. 15: 199-202.<br />

13. \VELLS, J. S. 1953. Pointers on propagation; propagating Koster Spruce. Amer Nurs.<br />

98 (9): 13, 48-53.<br />

NIGERIA<br />

Fertiliser Response of Eucalyptus grandis A. L. Mc.Comb, G.C.A. Ojo and J. K.<br />

Jackson.<br />

IN 1966 an inspection of two-year-old plantations of Eucalyptus grandis on the<br />

MambiIla Plateau, North East State showed that most of the trees at both<br />

Maisamari and Nguroje were slow growing and had reddish-purple leaves. Trees<br />

with normal green leaves were two to three times taller. Young maize plants in<br />

adjacent fields showed classical symp'to·ms of p,hosphorous deficiency. Quick tests<br />

made on the soil with Hellige-Truog equipment gave pH values ranging from 5.2<br />

to 5.8 and showed phosphorus, calcium and magnesium to· be very low.<br />

The following experiment was conducted to ascertain if E. grandis seedlings on<br />

one of the soils were suffering from phosphorus deficiency, to determine if other<br />

nutrients might be limiting growth and to see if calcium and magnesium would<br />

improve growth, possibly by increasing availability of phosphorus.<br />

Methods<br />

Two bags of soil were o,btained from the Maisamari plantation through the local<br />

forestry officer. One represented the top soil from 0-6 in. (0-0.15 m.), the second,<br />

subsoil from 12-18 in. (0.30 to 0.46 m). Thirteen nutrient treatments with a control<br />

were applied to each soil in standard (3 x 9 in.) black polythene p,ots. There was<br />

sufficient soil for only seven replicates of the surface so,il and five of the subsoil.<br />

Seeds of E. grandis were sown in each pot and the seedlings later thinned to one<br />

per pot. except for some subsoil pots 'where seedlings grew very poorly. During<br />

germination the pots were watered several times a day by means of a spray to keep<br />

the top 2 in. of soil constantly moist. Sample pots were weighed periodically to<br />

determine the amount of water to be added. The quantity added twice daily was<br />

approximately equal to evapotranspiration losses and it brought the soil to near the<br />

field capacity.<br />

Soil analyses<br />

Standard laboratory chemical and particle size analyses were made on samples<br />

from each lot of soil. pH was determined with a glass electrode in a 1-2.5 soil­<br />

\vater mixture, organic matter by oxidation with chromic acid and phosphorus<br />

31


RESEARCH NOTES 33<br />

Results<br />

After four months growth heights were measured, plants harvested and fresh<br />

weights determined. Separate analyses of variance were made of fresh weights on<br />

both surface and subsoil. Figure 1 shows mean fresh weights and the analyses of<br />

variance are in Table 4. Treatments o'n b,oth fresh weights and heights.<br />

On untreate'd subsoil E. grandis grew only 34 mm. in height in four months, but<br />

when P was added alone or with Nand K, seedlings were' 3-6 times taller and 12 to<br />

24 times heavier. With NPK,'CaMg and B along or with four other micronutrients,<br />

heights were 8 to 10 times greater than the control and fresh 'weights 60-70 times<br />

greater.<br />

In contrast to the results with surface soil CaMg alone increased growth very<br />

little, but when added with NPK a large increase occurred. Since the soil was<br />

strongly acid and the amount of calcium carbonate added was small, available P<br />

may have remained at a critical level until added in NPK. It is also possible, in<br />

view of the interaction between 'CaMg and NPK and the Iow levels of Ca and Mg<br />

in the subsoil that either or both Ca and Mg may have been directly limiting.<br />

TABLE 4<br />

ANALYSES OF VARIANCE OF FRESH WEIGHTS OF Eucalyptus grandis GROWN IN A SOIL FROM<br />

THE MAMBILLA PLATEAU<br />

Source d.f. SUlTI of Sqllares Mean Square F<br />

Surface Soil<br />

-----<br />

Total 97 4784<br />

Treatments 13 1613 124.1 3.57*<br />

Replicates 6 425 70.8 2.04 n.s.<br />

Error 78 2710 34.7<br />

Subsoil<br />

Total 69 ]234<br />

Treatments 13 846 65.0 10.08*<br />

Replicates 4 53 13.2 2.05 n.s.<br />

Error 52 335 6.4<br />

The effect of micronutrients in the presence of NPK on plants grown in subsoil<br />

was also large. C'omparing this treatment with NPK, CaMg, Micro and, B, NPK,<br />

CaMg, and in view of the fact that B was included in the micronutrient treatment,<br />

the results suggest response to B and a possible effect of CaMg increasing B or<br />

rnicronutrient availability as well as availability of P.<br />

These results suggest it would be virtually impossible to grow E. grandis from<br />

';;eed on pure subsoil exposed by erosion without fertiliser treatment. Multiple<br />

nutrient deficiences with P being most significant are indicated.<br />

Growth on surface soil was much greater than on subsoil. Duncan's range test<br />

showed that the fresh weights of all treatments except N. NK, and B were<br />

significantly greater than the control. Seedlings receiving P alone or in combination<br />

with Nand K were about twice as tall as the controls and three times heavier. K<br />

gave a statistically significant resp'onse, but the increase due to N or NK was not<br />

significant. The addition of CaMg and micronutrients to NPK gave no increase in<br />

height over NPK alone and fresh weight increases were' sma.ll and not statistically<br />

significan1.


34 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

TABLE 5<br />

TOTAL HEIGHTS (M) AND FRESH WEIGHTS (G) OF Eucalyptus grandis SEEDLINGS GROWN IN<br />

POTS ON A MAMBILLA PLATEAU SURFACE AND SUBSOIL<br />

Treatment<br />

I<br />

Surface Soil I Subsoil<br />

0-6 inches (0-0.15 m.) 12-18 inches (0.30-0.46 m.)<br />

I<br />

Fresh Weight Total Height I Fresh Weight Total Height<br />

(g) I (m) (g) (m)<br />

I<br />

Control<br />

4.5 0.175 0.15 0.034<br />

N I 8.8 0.247 0.45 0.065<br />

P 14.9 0.283 3.67 0.148<br />

K 11.6 0.270 0.19 0.034<br />

NP 13.0 0.305 1.81 0.187<br />

NK 8.1 0.240 0.06 0.029<br />

PK 15.1 0.314 3.15 0.151<br />

NPK 13.7 0.300 2.01 0.092<br />

CaMg 14.3 0.326 0.44 0.047<br />

I<br />

NPK, Ca Mg 17.2<br />

0.379 7.05 0.216<br />

NPK, Ca Mg, Micro* 15.1 0.325 10.65 0.290<br />

NPK, Micro 16.7 0.336<br />

6.49 0.225<br />

B, NPK, CaMg 19.5 0.387 8.99 0.337<br />

Boron 7.8 0.218 0.47 0.047<br />

*Micronutrients are tnanganese, zinc, copper, molybdenum and boron<br />

Plants receiving only CaMg were about the same size as those receiving P alone<br />

or in combination with Nand K, and were significantly larger than the controls.<br />

No tissue tests were made so it was not possible to tell, as planned, if :CaMg increased<br />

the availability of soil P to the seedlings. 'Seedlings receiving B alone were<br />

about 75 per cent heavier than the controls but the difference was not quite significant<br />

at the 5 per cent probability level. T'here is no evidence that the see'dlings<br />

responded to the other micronutrients-manganese, zinc, copp1er and molybdenum.<br />

The evidence as a whole points to P as the principal limiting element with the<br />

suggestion that B may also be re'quired and that liming may help, increase P<br />

availability in the less acid surface soil. Because of the rather large variations in<br />

treatment response between replicates a more detailed discussion of the interactions<br />

of various treatments does not seem warranted. The' need for field fertiliser trials<br />

employing at least P. B, Ca and N alone and in combinations, is indicated.<br />

I


ALL LIFE ON EARTH<br />

World Wildlife Fund 2nd International Congress<br />

VIEWED OBJECTIVELY this Congress was a tremendous success. How could it be otherwise<br />

when gathered on one platform were two royal sponsors, Their Royal Highnesses,<br />

The Prince of the Netherlands and the Duke of Edinburgh together with a galaxy<br />

of leaders in the field of human accomplishments; Mr. Neil Armstrong, first man on<br />

the Moon; Sir Bernard Lovell, Director of Jodrell Bank; Dr. Thor Heyerdahl of<br />

Kontiki fame; Dr. Jacques Piccard, designer of the mesocaphe for underwater<br />

research; to mention but a few well-known household names and not forgetting<br />

Mr. Peter Scott, founder of the movement.<br />

Viewed subjectively what was this Congress all about? The theme of the Congress<br />

was "All Life on Earth" or to use the latest catchword the "biosphere". It is true that<br />

protection of various forms of animal and plant life were considered by the various<br />

speakers but more in passing than as a theme. The main theme was quite openly the<br />

preservation of the environment in order to ensure man's own survival on this earth.<br />

A visitor from outer space might well have considered this Congress a meeting of<br />

Doomwatch Incorporated, or a gathering of harbingers of doom. The press certainly<br />

seized on this aspect, witness headlines from one evening paper 'Man is doomedwarning<br />

over population boom'.<br />

In his opening address, Prince Philip, President of the British National Appeal<br />

hit the nail on the head with his comment "If the support of distinguished people<br />

could solve the problem of the world's wildlife the campaign would be over bar the<br />

cheering". He went on to criticise the meagre support given so far by Governments<br />

and the United Nations. He made further points alnounting to "We want our cake<br />

and to eat it as well; we think wildlife is a good thing but we want the land it occupies;<br />

we like animals but we want the furs they wear." We thought His Royal Highness's<br />

strictures on management of existing reserves and parks somewhat unfair. Surely it is<br />

a case of too few trying to do too much with too little support.<br />

Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands followed Prince Philip. He came straight to the<br />

point, the root cause of the trouble is the present population explosion and the<br />

accompanying demand for more of the good things of life. He went on to say that the<br />

cause was as good as lost unless we could limit our population and provide enough<br />

room for both men and animals to live in har'mony.<br />

Mr. Peter Scott in his address moved immediately onto what was to becon1e the<br />

theme of the Congress; the danger to the environment and what could be done about<br />

it. Quoting from population statistics, consumption trends, literacy trends, and<br />

referring to such recent books as Rachel Carson's Silent Spring he painted a most<br />

ominous picture of the future of mankind. A future which would be inevitable unless<br />

the Message got through. A Message to the Decision Makers, alias our legislators.<br />

He expressed himself as in favour of space exploration but not S.S.T. (super sonic<br />

transport), a sOlnewhat contradictory attitude we thought.<br />

There followed a galaxy of distinguished speakers, leaders in their own sphere.<br />

American lunarnaut, Mr. Neil Armstrong revealed himself as a very able speaker<br />

as well as a space explorer. His talk was preceded by a most impressive colour film of<br />

the Apollo 11 Moon Landing. Mr. Armstrong restricted his talk on the moon trip<br />

to a description of 'The Blue Planet' as seen from the Moon. He then switched to the<br />

problems of conservation on earth. He spoke on the need for better land use in order<br />

to produce the extra food for the extra two billion population expected by the end<br />

of the century. Fortunately Mr. ArlTIstrong was not exposed to questions, as at least<br />

three participants were lined up to ask him whether the cost of putting him on the<br />

Moon would not have been better spent on irrigating the Sahara or even financing the<br />

World Wildlife Fund.<br />

Dr. G. H. Beeby, President of the Society of Chemical Industry spoke on the threat<br />

to the environment from pollution, firstly from chemical processing and secondly<br />

36


ALL LIFE ON EARTH 37<br />

from the problem of indestructible waste. As a particular instance he quoted the<br />

phenomenal persistence, chemically unchanged, of D.D.T. which had been found in<br />

penguins many thousands of miles from any point of use. Dr. Beeby and subsequent<br />

speakers emphasised the continued and increasing pollution of the atmosphere, the<br />

rivers and the oceans caused by pesticides, industrial processes and the waste products<br />

thereof.<br />

The Rt. Hon. Peter Walker, Secretary of State for the Environment gave a very<br />

good address. He showed a wide knowledge of the problems confronting him. Not<br />

everyone is completely happy, however, to find the future of a motor way and the<br />

conflicting interest of a National Park in the hands of the same authority.<br />

From the floor of the Congress one gained the impression that many of the 600<br />

participants were emotionally or sentimentally involved with the protection of particular<br />

animals or birds and were not quite in the picture with the Congress trend of<br />

protection of the environment including the oceans and the atmosphere.<br />

As a forester I was singularly disappointed not to find a distinguished forester<br />

among the speakers. As far as I could ascertain there were only two other foresters<br />

among the participants, Mr. Aleem, Inspector General of Forests, Pakistan and<br />

Mr. R. S1. Barbe Baker, founder of Men of the Trees. Surely the organisers of the<br />

World Wildlife Fund must be fully aware that of all the land areas of the globe those<br />

having the most effect on the environment or the biosphere are the World's forest<br />

areas. Canadian forest researchers have recently come up with the information that a<br />

healthy forest absorbs 12 tons of carbon dioxide and produces four tons of oxygen per<br />

acre per year. Canada alone has 600 million acres of forest, an acre produces sufficient<br />

oxygen for 20 people per year, a little simple arithmetic provides the answer that oxygen<br />

from Canada's forests alone would supply double the anticipated World population<br />

at the end of the century. Coming nearer home there are in Britain some 3,000,000<br />

acres of forests mostly in the care of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission. Is one to conclude that<br />

the World Wildlife Fund is afraid the spectre of 'serried ranks of Conifers' might spoil<br />

its image? A forester among the speakers might well have brought a ray of hope to<br />

brighten the otherwise gloomy list of prognoses. Of all people foresters are best<br />

equipped favourably to influence the environment.<br />

In this same forestry context one cannot help wondering whether the sponsors of<br />

the World Wildlife Fund, not to mention the majority of the participants, are aware<br />

that had it not been for the activities of earlier generations of foresters particularly in<br />

the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> there would today have been very little wildlife to conserve or<br />

habitat in which to conserve it. Foresters established their forest reserves, the first<br />

game reserves and wrote the wildlife laws, many of which are still valid.<br />

One strange omission from the gloomy forecasts was any reference to the possibility<br />

of a nuclear holocaust. Science fiction writers have been so often right in the past.<br />

They could be right again.<br />

The Congress concluded with the adoption of a series of resolutions addressed to<br />

all World Governments including a personal message from the President of the World<br />

Wildlife Fund (International) H.R.H. Prince of the Netherlands inviting all Governlnents<br />

to initiate some form of population control. Obviously Utopia cannot be<br />

attained as a result of one Congress; many themes will require hammering home by<br />

subsequent Congresses before a millenium is reached.<br />

As an example the resolution which evoked the most emotional response from the<br />

floor was that ably proposed by H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands appealing<br />

to all women to renounce the wearing or use of garments or products from certain<br />

endangered animals, in particular the larger felines; yet the following week-end a<br />

well-known variety star arrived at Heathrow wearing a leopard skin coat and a Sunday<br />

newspaper sponsored a competition involving a variety of fur coats including some<br />

from skins of the named animals.<br />

E.W.M.


40 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

The vegetation consists almost entirely of rainforest (simple mesophyll vine forest<br />

according to Webb's classification of 1959). Several of the ridges support a growth of<br />

eucalypts (chiefly Eucalyptus grandis) with a rainforest understory.<br />

Rainfall is variable and during the past eight years has ranged from 64 to 140 inches<br />

with an average of 108 inches (Fig. 2). Rainfall is markedly seasonal and most falls<br />

occur during the wet season months from January to April. During this period very<br />

little logging activity takes place.<br />

A dam is to be built at Copperlode Falls to provide better storage and regulation<br />

for the Cairns City and Mulgrave Shire domestic water supply. The area to be<br />

inundated is logged to a minimum girth of 48 inches girth breast height (g.b.h.) while<br />

the remaining area is logged to girth limits imposed by the tree marking rules of the<br />

Queensland <strong>Forestry</strong> Department. Treemarked logging generally removes 3,000 to<br />

5,000 super feet per acre, while logging down to 48 inches g.b.h. generally removes<br />

8,000 to 10,000 super feet per acre. This means that the area to be inundated is subjected<br />

to a heavy Jogging with the removal of a large number of small trees, resulting in<br />

severe disturbance by crawler tractors and the exposure of a large area of bare soil.<br />

Methods<br />

Commencing late in 1965, samples of stream water were collected automatically<br />

at various points in the catchment (see Fig. 1) using vertically integrated single stage<br />

samplers-type U.S. U-59B (Inter-agency Committee on Water Resources, 1961).<br />

These samplers are designed to operate on the rising stage of the streams and they<br />

were arranged on a staff to take a sample with each four inch rise of the stream. The<br />

samplers were located above and below areas of major logging activity on each of the<br />

two main streams. In addition to the permanent samplers, hand samples were taken<br />

during rain periods as opportunities presented themselves.<br />

The sediment concentration of the samples was determined using millipore filtration<br />

equipment (Winneberger, Austin and Klett, 1963) and expressed in parts per million<br />

(p.p.m.).<br />

Samples were collected during the wet season each year from 1965-66 until 1968-69.<br />

Access into the catchment was often cut for up to six weeks after very heavy rain periods<br />

due to slides across the roads. This prevented complete sampling from being carried<br />

out. Rainfall was recorded in storage gauges at several points in the catchment (Fig. 1)<br />

and a recording rain gauge located'adjacent to sediment sampling point S4 provided<br />

rainfall intensity information.<br />

Results<br />

Sediment Effects<br />

Noticeable concentrations of suspended sediment occurred in the streams only<br />

following periods of rain. At other times the sediment level normally remained below<br />

4p.p.m.<br />

Exceptions occurred when vehicles moved through open stream crossings. When<br />

this occurred, sediment levels rose to several hundred p.p.m. immediately downstream<br />

of the disturbance, but dropped to upstream levels within a short distance. However,<br />

in this way a considerable amount of fine sediment was stored in the stream bed ready<br />

to move into suspension as soon as a stream rise occurred. For this reason, open ford<br />

crossings are undesirable features in a catchment where sediment levels are considered<br />

important.<br />

The first year of sampling (1965-66) was one of low total rainfall and was marked<br />

by an almost complete lack of high intensity falls. Because of this only a relatively<br />

small number of samples was obtained from the permanent sampling stations. There<br />

were only two periods of high intensity rain during the year and the sediment levels<br />

resulting from the first of these are shown in Fig. 3. The increase in sediment levels<br />

between the stations above and below logging activity is marked. The sediment derived<br />

from the streams flowing through undisturbed areas was largely organic in nature and


42 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

contrasted with the mineral sediment from the streams after they had flowed through<br />

the logged and roaded area.<br />

The sediment graphs from the sampling stations located below logging activity<br />

shown in Fig. 3 show a peak early in the rise of the stream. This pattern was also<br />

characteristic of almost all the sampling in subsequent years and was probably due to<br />

the sediment source areas being fairly close to the sampling stations. The initial<br />

flush of surface runoff from bare areas in the lower portions of the catchment caused<br />

high sediment concentrations in the early stages of the stream rise. These high<br />

concentrations were diluted as the increased flows from the undisturbed upper catchment<br />

areas made their impact on the total flow. Sediment concentrations then increased<br />

again due' to stream bank and bed erosion from the high flows'.<br />

Samples were taken from one of the reservoirs in the city of Cairns nine hours after<br />

the main storm period which produced the sediment pattern shown in Fig. 3. These<br />

samples revealed a concentration of 430 p.p.m. The reservoir became fully charged<br />

with turbid water and took about a week to clear.<br />

Data from the permanent sampling stations provided information on the total<br />

sediment levels from the disturbed area of the catchment. However, 'it was necessary<br />

to pinpoint the sediment source areas and evaluate the contributions of the various<br />

sources. To achieve this, samples were collected from sections of the stream which<br />

were crossed by roads or were influenced by snig tracks, log ramps, etc. In some cases<br />

sediment source areas were located by following turbid water upstream during rain<br />

periods, until the source of the sediment was found.<br />

It became apparent that most of the sediment was derived from poorly located<br />

undrained roads and snig tracks and from earth and log fill crossings such as that<br />

shown in Fig. 4. One striking point which emerged was the fact that a major portion<br />

of the sediment was derived from a few small sediment source areas. An example of<br />

the effect of one of these areas is shown in Table 1. Even though no noticeable rise<br />

occurred in stream height, considerable sedimentation resulted.<br />

TABLE I<br />

Sediment concentration from a log ramp adjacent to the stream after rain influence of 26<br />

points in 20 minutes between 1320 and 1340 hours on 25.1.66.<br />

Upstream of ramp<br />

Location Time (hours) Sediment concentration (p.p.m.)<br />

Immediately downstream of ramp<br />

50 metres downstream of ramp<br />

400 metres downstream of ramp<br />

400 metres downstream of ramp<br />

13.45<br />

13.45<br />

13.50<br />

14.00<br />

15.45<br />

48<br />

2,602<br />

Table 1 shows also how the sediment clears rapidly once rain ceases. However,<br />

during the wet season light showers such as the one which caused the sediment levels<br />

shown in Table 1 frequently occur for days or even weeks at a time. Consequently<br />

this can result in an almost continuous source of sediment-laden water leaving the<br />

catchment.<br />

In general, sedimentation occurred following almost every rain influence and it<br />

became severe and affected the city water supply after rains ofmoderately low intensity.<br />

The area covered by snig tracks during normal rainforest logging is considerable<br />

as can be seen from Table 2. '<br />

203<br />

186<br />

21


EFFECTS OF LOGGING ON STREAMFLOW IN NORTH QUEENSLAND 43<br />

TABLE 2<br />

Area covered by snig tracks dUling rainforest logging from which approximately 10,000<br />

super feet per acre log timber was removed (unpublished data * from B. P. M. Hyland).<br />

Main Snig Tracks<br />

First order Snig Tracks<br />

Second order Snig Tracks<br />

TOTAL<br />

*Data obtained by point sampling on a one chain grid over an area 0/65 acres.<br />

per cent of Area covered<br />

by Snig Tracks<br />

The situation in Freshwater Creek would be very similar to that shown in Table 2"<br />

as the volume of timber removed per acre was approximately the same. The main<br />

snig tracks normally have all of the topsoil removed and produce excellent artificial<br />

water channels. When downhill snigging is carried out (as it is in the lower portion of<br />

Freshwater Creek) this produces a network of deeply worn snig tracks converging onto<br />

a log ramp adjacent to the creek. In the absence of drainage from the snig tracks the<br />

effect on the water quality is obvious.<br />

The snig tracks remain erosion hazards for many years because the topsoil has been<br />

removed and vegetation does not establish readily on the less fertile subsoil.<br />

As a result of the above findings the logging agreements which cover the timber<br />

sales in the Freshwater Creek basin were modified in an attempt to reduce the amount<br />

and duration of sediment in the streams.<br />

These modifications include the following points:<br />

(a) Snigging and hauling through running streams is prohibited.<br />

(b) The location of roads, log ramps and major snig tracks is subject to approval by<br />

the field officer in charge. Log ramps to be kept as far away from streams as<br />

practicable and in any case at least two chain from any stream bank.<br />

(c) The purchaser must construct and maintain drains from roads, snig tracks and log<br />

ramps.<br />

(d) Earth and log fill crossings (as shown in Fig. 4) are prohibited and where practicable,<br />

girder bridges are constructed.<br />

(e) A logging arch is used where this is considered necessary by the field officer in<br />

charge.<br />

(f) Operations may be suspended by the field officer if he considers these operations<br />

are detrimental to water or forest interests.<br />

During 1967 these conditions were inserted in all new timber sales in the area and<br />

in all other sales as they became due for re-assessment. In the old sale areas departmental<br />

plant was used to construct drains and water bars on all sediment-yielding roads<br />

and snig tracks.<br />

Sediment sampling continued during the wet season from 1966-67 to 1968-69.<br />

Rainfall was higher during these years than during the first year of sampling, and this<br />

caused frequent and often extended interruptions to the sampling programme. Heavy<br />

rains from cyclonic influences off the cost caused considerable damage to roads and<br />

bridges and hampered access. Most of the earth and log fill crossings washed away<br />

at such times and this contributed to extremely high sediment levels in the streams<br />

and reservoirs. The sediment sampling stations were always damaged and frequently<br />

washed away entirely on these occasions. However, from the numerous samples that<br />

were collected it was evident that the pattern of sediment levels which was apparent<br />

during 1965-66 was maintained until 1967-68. However, by the 1968-69 wet season<br />

there was a marked reduction in sediment levels (Fig. 5). The highest sediment level<br />

obtained from the reservoirs in Cairns during 1968-69 was 39 p.p.m. and this was<br />

immediately following 25 inches of rain in three days from cyclone "Bridget". The<br />

4*<br />

6.0<br />

9.0<br />

6.1<br />

21.1


44 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

highest level measured from the permanent sampling stations within the catchment<br />

during 1968-69 was 188 p.p.m. after 1,050 points of rain (Fig. 6). This contrasts with<br />

Fig. 3 which shows the results of a storm of only 263 points in 1966.<br />

Logging continued at approximately the same intensity during the four years of<br />

measurement, and although work commenced on some new sale areas in the upper<br />

reaches of the catchment (some distance from the lower sediment sampling points)<br />

logging still continued on most of the sale areas in the lower portion of the catchment.<br />

Figure 4. Earth and log fill crossings such as the one depicted here were a common feature<br />

of roading practice in Freshwater Creek prior to 1967. Normal wet season rain washes these<br />

crossings away and causes considerable sedimentation of the water supply.<br />

Streamflow Effects<br />

A number of local authority officers have expressed concern at the possible<br />

deleterious effects on streamflow quantity caused by heavy logging. This concern is<br />

based on the assumption that greatly increased evaporation will occur from bare soil<br />

exposed by logging, thus decreasing the water available for streamflow. Such effects<br />

are difficult to assess, as streamflow records from Freshwater Creek (at Copperlode<br />

Falls), are only available from mid 1960. In addition, there are few records available<br />

from streams in the same area with which a comparison could be made. However, a<br />

double n1ass curve analysis was carried out to compare the yields of Freshwater Creek<br />

\vith those ofBabinda Creek (25 miles south of Freshwater Creek) which flows through<br />

a virgin rainforest catchment (Fig. 7). This shows that there is no major inconsistency<br />

in the relationship between the annual flow from the two streams. However, there is a<br />

slight tendency towards an increase in the flow of Freshwater Creek compared with<br />

that from Babinda Creek as is indicated by the general increase in the relative slope of<br />

the various segments of the curve with time. This could be a random movement, and<br />

to test this a double mass curve analysis was carried out to compare the rainfall at<br />

Copperlode Falls with that at Babinda (Fig. 8). Rainfall and runoff are normally<br />

closely correlated, so it could be expected that any fluctuations shown in the rainfall<br />

curve would be reflected in the runoff curve. The relative slope of the various segments


EFFECTS OF LOGGING ON STREAMFLOW IN NORTH QUEENSLAND 47<br />

of the curve in Fig. 8 show very little change and the entire curve approximates a<br />

straight line. This strengthens the suggestion that there has been a slight increase<br />

in runoff from Freshwater Creek.<br />

This is the expected trend, as removal of the deep rooted trees lessens the transpiration<br />

demand on the soil water store and more of the subsequent rainfall is available<br />

for streamflow. Increased evaporation will occur from the bare soil areas, but<br />

experience elsewhere indicates that this is more than offset by the savings made from<br />

reduced transpiration (Lull and Fletcher 1962, Ziemer 1964, Orr 1968).<br />

Discussion<br />

The primary objective of this investigation was to determine improvements in the<br />

current logging practices so that sediment levels in Freshwater Creek are kept to a<br />

t1lininlUJTI. It has been shown that sediment levels can be reduced substantially by the<br />

application ofa few simple precautions. A large portion of the sediment is derived from<br />

a relatively few sediment source areas, and it is the attention to small details to prevent<br />

the occurrence of these source areas which has brought about a marked improvement<br />

to the overall sediment production picture. The importance of these relatively small<br />

areas in producing more than their share, on an area basis, of runoff and sediment has<br />

been noted in other studies (Marston 1952, Betson 1964, Gilmour 1968).<br />

With the type of logging being carried out in Freshwater Creek it is inevitable that<br />

sonle sedimentation will occur during periods of intense and prolonged rain. The main<br />

road access to the basin is from the north, and because of the rugged topography the<br />

111ain logging roads tend to follow the streams, particularly in the lower portion of the<br />

catchnlent. This in itself is bad roading practice as it is impossible to prevent some soil<br />

fronl the roads being washed into the stream. However, it is the only feasible location<br />

for the roads under the prevailing conditions, so added care and attention is necessary<br />

for road drainage.<br />

The logging occurring in the lower portions of the Freshwater Creek basin is heavier<br />

than nornlally occurs because all commercial trees above 48 inches g.b.h. are being<br />

removed from the area to be inundated by the proposed Copperlode Falls Dam.<br />

Because of this no attempt was made to leave a filter strip of uncut vegetation along<br />

the strealTI banks. The retention of such a strip would probably be of great advantage<br />

in filtering out sediment from runoff originating on disturbed areas. The effectiveness<br />

of this provision is currently under test in a small rainforest catchment on the Atherton<br />

Tableland.<br />

Two resources are being utilised from Freshwater Creek-timber and water-and<br />

both of them are very valuable. A total of 27.6 million super feet of log timber has<br />

been harvested from the basin since logging commenced in 1960 (until mid 1969).<br />

The value of this timber to the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department in terms of royalty was $528,000.<br />

The retail value of the timber is difficult to determine. However, assuming a 40 per<br />

cent recovery and an average retail price of $25 per 100 super feet, the retail price is<br />

$2.76 Inillion. This averages out at about $307,000 per year. This would be somewhat<br />

conservative, as many of the logs are converted to veneer which is a high priced<br />

product. Nonetheless it serves to illustrate the value of the timber derived from this<br />

one small basin in the general economy of the Cairns District.<br />

The monetary value of the other resource utilised from the area-water-is even<br />

more difficult to determine. The receipts to the Cairns City and Mulgrave Shire<br />

Councils for rates and charges from the Freshwater Creek supply during 1965-66<br />

were $91,000, and this may be considered to be the "retail" value of the water.<br />

Water will continue to be harvested long after the present cutting cycle is completed<br />

and the overall monetary value of the water will probably exceed that of the timber.<br />

It may be argued that it is impossible to place a monetary value on the water supply<br />

as it is essential to the well being of the community. In addition, there are numerous<br />

intangible benefits which can be attributed to both the timber and the water.<br />

It is obvious from the above discussion that there are two verY'valuable resources


48 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

being harvested from the one area and, as generally occurs in such cases, conflicts<br />

have arisen between them. If it is desired to receive the maximum benefit to the<br />

community as a whole from the resources available, each resource producer has to<br />

make concessions to the other. As mentioned previously, it is impossible to keep all<br />

sediment from the streams and this is the concession which the water authorities<br />

have to make-perhaps even to the extent of installing a filtration plant. The timber<br />

users have to make concessions by leaving certain areas of timber uncut to protect<br />

stream banks, by spending money on constructing girder bridges and by building<br />

drains and water bars on roads and snig tracks. Commencing in mid 1967 all new timber<br />

sales and an sales which became due for re-assessment had allowances included in the<br />

royalty determinations to enable the purchaser to carry out the drainage and bridging<br />

requirements. This represents a total loss of royalty to the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department of<br />

approximately $16,800 (including the loss calculated on the timber still to be removed<br />

from the catchment).<br />

We are rapidly approaching the stage in Australia where management of forest land<br />

for one resource only is no longer feasible. As population pressures increase and we<br />

have to rely on an unchanging or diminishing resource level, we will be forced into a<br />

system of multiple use management in order to make the most effective use of the<br />

resources available. Under such a system it is seldom possible to achieve optimum<br />

production from anyone resource because of the concessions that have to be made to<br />

accommodate the others. However, properly applied it will yield the greatest total<br />

benefit to the community.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS •<br />

Permission to publish this paper and to' quote from <strong>Forestry</strong> Department records is gratefully<br />

acknowledged. Assistance was provided by Mr. K. D. Sanderson for a large part of the field<br />

and laboratory work, and the streamflow records were provided by the Queensland Irrigation<br />

and Water Supply Commission. Mr. P. Maconachie collected most of the samples froin the<br />

Cairns City Council reservoirs and reticulation system.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BERNDT, H. W. and SWANK, G. W., 1970. Forest land use and streamflow in Central Oregon.<br />

U.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Pap. PNW-93.<br />

BETsoN, R. P., 1964. What is watershed runoff? J. Gephys. Res. 69: 1541-52.<br />

GILMOUR, D. A., 1968. Hydrological investigations of soil and vegetation types in the lower<br />

Cotter catchment. Aust. For. 32: 243-56.<br />

HAUPT, H. F. and KIDD, W. J., 1965. Good logging practices reduce sedimentation in Central<br />

Idaho. J. For. 63: 664-70.<br />

HmBERT, A. R., 1969. Water yield changes after converting a forested catchment to grass.<br />

Water Resour. Res. 5: 634-40.<br />

Inter-agency Committee on Water Resources, 1961. The Single-Stage sampler for suspended<br />

sediment! Report No. 13 of Subcommittee on sedimentation. D.S. Govt. Printing Office.<br />

LULL, H. W. and FLETcHER, P. W., 1962. Comparative influence of hardwood trees, litter,<br />

and bare area on soil-moisture regimen. Dni. of Missouri, Agr. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 800.<br />

LULL, H. W. and REINHART, K. G., 1967. Increasing water yield in the northeast by Inanagement<br />

of forested watersheds. U.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Pap. NE-66.<br />

MARSTON, R. B., 1952. Ground cover requirements for summer storm run-off control on<br />

aspen sites in Nothern Utah. J. For. 50: 303-7.<br />

ORR, H. K. 1968. Soil moisture trends after thinning and clearcutting in a second-growth<br />

Ponderosa Pine stand in the Black Hills. D.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Note RM-99.<br />

PACKER, P. E. 1966. Forest treatment effects on water quality. "Forest Hydrology" Pergamon<br />

Press, Oxford and New York 1966.<br />

REINHART, K. G., ESCHNER, A. R. and TRIMBLE, G. R., 1963. Effect on streamflow of four<br />

forest practices in the mountains of West Virginia. V.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Pap. NE-I.<br />

WEBB, L. J., 1959. A Physiognomic classification of Australian rain forests. J. Ecol. 47: 551­<br />

570.<br />

WINNEBERGER, J. H., AUSTIN, J. H. and KLETT, C. A., 1963. Membrane filter weight determinations.<br />

Water Pollution Control Journal 35: 807-13. .<br />

ZIEMER, R. R., 1964. Summer evapotranspiration trends as related to time after logging of<br />

forests in Sierra Nevada. J. Geophys. Res. 69: 615-20.


AUSTROPLATYPUS, A NEW GENUS OF THE<br />

PLATYPODIDAE {COLEOPTERA}, INFESTING LIVING<br />

EUCALYPTUS TREES IN AUSTRALIA<br />

F. G. BROWNE<br />

IN DESCRIBING the Australian Platypus incompertus, Schedl (1968) noted that "the<br />

species is rather difficult to place in one of the known groups or within the genus<br />

Platypus". Having examined numerous specimens of both sexes ofthis species, and also<br />

the larva, sent to me by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of New South Wales, I am of the<br />

opinion that it is impossible to include it in Platypus, and that it represents a hitherto<br />

unknown genus of doubtful affinities, for which the name Austroplatypus is proposed.<br />

The antennal club, which is rather small and not strongly compressed (not large and<br />

strongly compressed as in Platypus), and the outer face of which has a smooth basal<br />

plate, most closely resembles that of Notoplatypus, another Australian genus, but<br />

other characters seem to place it in the Platypodini, rather close to the Malaysian<br />

Dendroplatypus. The larval characters, which will be described elsewhere, also suggest<br />

affinity with Dendroplatypus,. they differ from those of the Platypus larva in the form<br />

of the labrum and of the prodorsal pattern of the thorax.<br />

Generic characters ofthe adult. Body slender. Head a little wider than the pronotum,<br />

the frons abruptly separated from the vertex, flattened, about as wide as long. Eyes<br />

subcircular, set on the sides of the head. Antenna (Fig. lA) inserted on the side of the<br />

head close to the lower border ofthe eye; scape subcylindrical, a little longer than wide;<br />

funicle inserted at the apex of the scape, four-segmented; club ovate, rather small, only<br />

a little longer than the funical, not very strongly compressed, the outer face with a<br />

smooth, corneous basal plate, the remainder porous and pubescent. Maxilla (Fig. 1C)<br />

with galea and lacinia united, the maxillary palpus four-segmented, the segments firm<br />

and cylindrical, not compressed as in Platypus. Labial palpi (Fig. 1B) composed of<br />

three free segments. Pronotum with long, shallow lateral emarginations, only the<br />

posterior extremities of which are abruptly angulate. Scutellum depressed. Elytra of<br />

male and female more or less similar, the apical declivity obliquely convex. Abdomen<br />

longitudinally almost horizontal. Prothoracic coxae approximate. Outer face of the<br />

prothoracic tibia with some transverse carinae in both sexes.<br />

Fig. 1. Austroplatypus incompertus. A, antenna. B, labial pa/pi. C, maxilla.<br />

B<br />

49


TREES-BRITAIN'S NEGLECTED ASSET $3<br />

It was obvious that with personal taxation rates rising all the time, the encouragement,<br />

by way oftax incentives, given to woodland owners to plant trees was ofinterest.<br />

A few individuals decided to purchase some land and plant trees. An organisation<br />

was set up to manage the investment. And in 1957 Fountain <strong>Forestry</strong> Ltd. was formed.<br />

Fountain <strong>Forestry</strong> Ltd. purchased more land as time progressed and developed<br />

its management service on behalf of clients both inside and outside the Group. Soon<br />

it was found that to keep men and machinery occupied it was worth contracting to<br />

work for neighbouring woodland owners. Gradually a comprehensive service was<br />

set up, involving management of the neighbouring owners' woods as well as those of<br />

new investors.<br />

In the '60s Fountain <strong>Forestry</strong> expanded rapidly, entering the '70s as managers of<br />

about 40,000 acres of woodlands in England, Wales and Scotland and marketing<br />

more than one million cubic feet of timber annually.<br />

In addition to the acres managed, the company has a contract turnover of several<br />

hundred thousand pounds on such diverse jobs as purchasing material from the<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission and marketing it; erection of fences for farmers and local<br />

authorities; silvicultural operations for small woodland owners; landscape gardening<br />

and a variety of other rural tasks.<br />

A steady stream of urban investors is bringing capital into the countryside through<br />

the company's schemes, and at the same time long established estates are being<br />

managed. These range in size from Dartington Hall Woodlands in Devon (about<br />

2,000 acres) down to small farms with 20 or 30 acres. To achieve this a large staff<br />

with many different specialist skills is involved.<br />

There are two main incentives to an industrialist or City man to invest in forestry,<br />

apart from the security afforded by ownership of land.<br />

First, he can elect to run his forestry commercially under Schedule D and so, by<br />

offsetting the development costs against gross earnings, create a capital asset from<br />

money which would otherwise be paid in tax. His heir will be assessed under Schedule<br />

B and, while paying a small annual tax, will pay no income tax, surtax or capital<br />

gains tax on timber sold.<br />

Secondly, because a timber crop takes 50 or 60 years to grow, the Inland Revenue<br />

has made special Estate Duty arrangements. These consist mainly of non-aggregation<br />

of the timber when assessing the rate of duty and of deferring payment of duty until<br />

timber is eventually harvested. Payment then is made only on the net proceeds after<br />

expenses based on the value at the date of death. Duty cannot be levied twice on the<br />

same crop.<br />

Direct aid in the form of planting and management grants is also available.<br />

One might expect that the encouragement given to private forestry would cause it<br />

to expand rapidly, and since the Second World War the rate ofexpansion has gradually<br />

accelerated. But the chief drawback of a forestry investment is the thought that one<br />

lTIUSt spend 20 to 25 years in building it up, although the profits will come to one's<br />

heirs. On the other hand, those who have been lucky enough to inherit productive<br />

woods from their far-sighted fathers and grandfathers are in no doubt about the<br />

value of the investment.<br />

All forecasts tell us that timber demand will continue to rise rapidly. Timber is our<br />

third largest import by value. Yet by international standards our planting rate falls<br />

woefully short of our country's timber needs for the future. Not only have we the<br />

smallest proportionate acreage under timber of any European country, but we are<br />

after the V.S.A. almost the largest timber users per capita in the world.<br />

Why is this when there are at least one million acres carrying scrub, most of which<br />

formerly carried timber, and there are more than 15 million acres of hill land<br />

euphemistically called "rough grazing"? In real terms the value of this land for<br />

grazing is no greater than it was in the days of pre-historic pastoral settlement.<br />

Land use in Britain is a subject of intense and growing interest. The rival claims of<br />

industry, transport, agriculture, forestry and recreation all require" to be assessed.


54 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

There is a plethora oflegislation affecting national parks, rural development areas and<br />

numerous Town and Country Planning Acts. Yet one factor stands out: namely that<br />

the city dweller does not realise how much of our rough grazing is fertile land which,<br />

given availability of capital and the existence of modem machinery and techniques,<br />

could be brought into forestry production.<br />

All management· decisions contain an element of selection. Management tries to<br />

select the course which leads to maximum long-term profitability. The clear indications<br />

are that a greatly increased national investment in timber would benefit the economy<br />

in terms of return on capital invested, in terms of imports saved, in terms of rural<br />

employment and, not least, for the people of these islands in terms of public amenity,<br />

recreation and scenic beauty.<br />

We could establish three million acres of forest for the price of the development<br />

costs of Concorde. This would almost double existing timber production. Both are<br />

desirable, but have the merits of both been equally carefully assessed?<br />

After many years of neglect and stagnation, the facts alone should mean that<br />

forestry as an industry will again take its rightful place in our affairs.<br />

Sheep occupy 1-1' million acres of our 15·5 million acres<br />

ofmarginal land. They save £40·25m in imports annually.<br />

Woodlands-many not yet in production-cover<br />

,4·3 million acres. Yet already they-save £55·5m annually.<br />

The illustration shows the difference in output per acre.<br />

Million<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

SHEEP<br />

WOODLANDS<br />

Million<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10


56 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

mlst extract ':and distribute it over every exposed "Surface. If the surface is porous,<br />

penetration of the water or water vapour carrying the acid will produce an everincreasing<br />

degree of deterioration.<br />

Limestone, when quarried and used for constructional purposes, may for a number<br />

ofyears remain insoluble in water and apparently immune to the effects ofthe weather.<br />

But, gradually, carbon dioxide is conveyed into the stone by moisture and water<br />

vapour to form soluble bicarbonate from the calcareous substrate. As the water­<br />

$oluble bicarbonates are leached out of the stone by rainwater or excessive condensation,<br />

minute tunnels and cavities are formed and the stone becomes progressively<br />

more porous. Penetrating water will not only accelerate the action of the carbonic<br />

acid, but the stone is now able to act as host to algal growths. Green stains and slime<br />

begin to appear on the damp stone and, if the stone dries out, turn black and form<br />

nutrient on which more advanced .vegetable life such as lichens, mosses and advanced<br />

plant life can grow.<br />

These vegetable growths produce their own quota of acids which, sometimes, have<br />

devastating effects on old buildings. Where acids released by lichens and mosses have<br />

been conveyed down a pitched roof by rain water, which always drips on the same part<br />

of a lead gutter, it is not at all uncommon to find that the lead has become exceedingly<br />

thin or cut right through by the dissolving effect of what one expert described as<br />

malic acid. Once the lead has been penetrated and rain water can get through, the<br />

increase in the process of deterioration is usually quite sensational. Dampness inside<br />

the building resulting in fungal and insect activity can produce rapid devastation.<br />

That so many ancient buildings have survived the ravages of time and the attacks<br />

of so many different forms of biological deterioration is quite remarkable. This is<br />

more particularly so in the damp temperate conditions which generally prevail through<br />

the year in Britain than in those countries where great extremes are experienced. If<br />

very hot and dry conditions prevail for only a few weeks, they can exert a marked<br />

degree of control over the development of fungi. So, in general, fungal deterioration<br />

of buildings in Britain is more rapid than in most places on the European mainland.<br />

To compensate for this, certain insects attack timber in buildings on the Continent<br />

which do relatively little harm in Britain. In fact the termite, Reticulitermes lucifugus,<br />

which is common and a serious pest in Europe south of Paris, does not exist in the<br />

British Isles. The other serious pest on the Continent is the House Longhorn Beetle,<br />

Hylotrupes bajulus, the activities of which are confined to a relatively small area of<br />

England south-west of London. In Britain, the common range of insects which attack<br />

timber in buildings are the three Anobiids, Anobiumpunctatum, Xestobium rufovillosum<br />

and Ptilinus pectinicornis; the Lyctids: Lyetus linearis and Lyetus brunneus and the<br />

Wood Weevils, Euophryum confine and Pentarthrum huttoni. The Anobiids are,<br />

undoubtedly, the most serious of the insect pests as the Lyctids only attack the sapwood<br />

of hardwoods during the period of seasoning and rarely after ten years from<br />

felling and the Weevils require the wood to be already decayed by fungi before their<br />

attack is initiated.<br />

Of the Anobiidae, the Common Furniture Beetle, Anobium punctatum (de Geer) is<br />

the most common and is, in fact, the most widespread and economically serious pest<br />

of.building timber in Britain. It will attack the sapwood of almost every species of<br />

timber, hard or softwood, grown in the temperate regions of the world and must rank<br />

as one ofthe world's most ubiquitous pests. The second Anobiid, Xestobium rufovillosum<br />

(de Geer) which carries the sinister appellation "Death Watch Beetle" is the pest<br />

mostly associated with mediaeval buildings. It is far less common than the Furniture<br />

Beetle but its name is probably better known because of the publicity given to appeals<br />

for funds to save churches, castles, abbeys and many ancient buildings from the<br />

ravages of this insect. It favours hardwood which has, been partially decayed by fungi<br />

but .will enter softwood adjoining infested hardwood if, likewise, it is affected by fungi.<br />

The most common. fungus attacking the timber in ancient buildings and, in fact,<br />

in any buildings suffering the effects of biological deterioration in the British Isles is


58 COMMO WEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Fig. 1. A well-maintained and restored 15th-century cottage.<br />

Fig. 2. Neglect of thatch started the destruction oj' this 15th-century cottage.<br />

Fig. 3. The effect of rainwater on wattle and daub infil panels.


BIOLOGICAL DETERIORATION OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS 59'<br />

has the well-known reference in Chapter 6 of Genesis "... and God said unto Noah<br />

-make thee an ark of gopher wood, rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt<br />

pitch it within and without with pitch". Pitch in this case was pro'bably the natural<br />

bituminous deposits found in'so many parts of the Holy Land.<br />

In Britain, little evidence exists of designed preservation of building timber until<br />

comparatively recent times. The mediaeval builders relied on the durable qualities of<br />

oak to provide a reasonable "life" to their wooden structures. The method of construction<br />

also contributed to the prolonged life of many ancient ,buildings. Very few<br />

were provided with rainwater disposal systems but by generous overhang of the roof<br />

and a further overhang of the upper storeys so that the ground floor was well tucked<br />

back from splash, the walls were kept fairly dry. The buildings which succumbed to<br />

the effects of biological deterioration were, generally, those which became neglected<br />

and this neglect was the rule and result of the dreadful poverty which occurred during<br />

the Middle Ages. This poverty and the overcrowding of the dilapidated houses' contributed<br />

in no small measure to the Black Death in 1348.<br />

Poverty due to oppression was rife and, as quoted in the English Chronicle in<br />

reference to the Norman barons in the 12th century"... they filled the land with<br />

castles and they cruelly oppressed the wretched folk with castle work. When the castles<br />

were made they filled them with devils and evil men. Then took they the men who they<br />

thought any goods to have, both by night and by day, churls and women, they cast<br />

them in prison for their gold and silver, and they tortured them with pains untellable,<br />

for never were any martyrs so tortured as they were. They hanged them up by the<br />

feet and smoked them with foul smoke, they hanged them by their thumbs or by the<br />

head and hanged fires on their feet. Many thousands they killed with hunger. Then<br />

was corn dear, and flesh, cheese and butter for none there was in the land."<br />

Kings, bishops and barons fought wars one against the other and these together<br />

with frequent invasions from the Continent of Europe, particularly from France, kept<br />

the country in a state of unrest and insecurity.<br />

The Empress Matilda and King Stephen fought several, each time with devastating<br />

effect on the population and buildings. In my own city of Winchester, the local Bishop<br />

-Henry de Blois-had his own private wars, first against King Stephen, then against<br />

the Empress Matilda (widowed Empress of Germany and daughter of Henry I of<br />

England). In the latter quarrel, to quote-"raid and counter-raid, siege and countersiege<br />

succeeded one another, till almost the whole city-houses, churches and monastries<br />

alike, were consumed in the flames". Far and wide the flames spread-even the<br />

new buildings of Hyde Abbey, only erected some thirty-one years, were involved in<br />

the general conflagration. The Cathedral and St. Swithun's Priory alone escaped and<br />

that, it is said, because Robert of Gloucester generously forebore reprisals.<br />

A further civil war in the 13th century between the extravagant and weak King<br />

Henry III (Henry of Winchester)" arid a powerful Baron, Simon de Montfort, again<br />

devastated the city.<br />

It was not until the 15th and 16th centuries that order began to prevail and the<br />

common people had the money, incentive and security to care for their houses.<br />

In the CromwelIian Civil War it was, of course, the castles and noble mansions<br />

which suffered most and were destroyed by the Roundheads. It was largely due to the<br />

efforts of the church that order and prosperity, very gradually, returned. But these<br />

efforts cannot be regarded as altruistic and due to piety and pity as the church relied<br />

for its own prosperity on the prosperity of the people.<br />

It, therefore, became important for the church to improve commercial prosperity<br />

so that levies or tithes could be paid by the people to the church. The encouragement of<br />

sheep farming and export ofwool to Europe, ina very great measure, built theprosperity<br />

of England. Canals, roads and ports were developed largely by the bishops and clergy,<br />

to maintain the flow of trade and secure the flow of levies into the coffers of the<br />

church. A very large proportion of the mediaeval houses and many beautiful churches<br />

which now stand, serve as a memorial to the prosperous wool merchants who were<br />

5*


60 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

directly or indirectly responsible for their erection.<br />

These still survive a few 12th 13th and 14th century domestic dwellings, some with<br />

the roof timbers in a remarkable state of preservation. The lack of insect and fungal<br />

deterioration of this rooftimber is due to the common practice ofhaving a fireplace in<br />

the centre of the hall with an aperture in the apex of the roof through which the smoke<br />

from the wood fires escaped. The gases from the burning wood condensed on the cool<br />

timber rafters, purlins and beams and deposited the products of destructive distillation<br />

or a crude wood form of wood creosote containing phenols and other preservative<br />

chemicals. Such halls were well ventilated to encourage the smoke to rise and clear.<br />

Even when fireplaces were introduced, they were large, with huge chimneys which<br />

greatly encouraged ventilation particularly as glass windows were extremely expensive<br />

and rare until Tudor times.<br />

The relative prosperity of the Tudor period, dating from the reign of Henry VIII<br />

in the early 16th century, resulted in the employment of foreign craftsmen; Italians,<br />

Germans, Flemish, and particularly German and Flemish Protestants who sought refuge<br />

from persecution in their own countries, settled in England and began to influence<br />

the design of English Architecture, particularly the ornamentations ofwood and stone.<br />

This elaboration and ornamentation with carved finials, barge boards, brackets,<br />

corbels, cornices and the like increased the hazards ofdeterioration. Every excrescence<br />

increased the area on which rainwater could fall and accumulate and the maintenance<br />

of buildings built since the 16th century became increasingly important.<br />

The half-timbered buildings which became so popular in the late 16th and early<br />

17th centuries were, and still are, some of the most difficult to maintain in good<br />

condition. The in-filling of wattle and daub (usually clay, cow dung and chopped<br />

straw spread over a lathing of willow, hazel or split chestnut) was both insulating<br />

and durable. Although it absorbed water, it quickly released it and this peculiar<br />

mixture was extremely flexible and adhesive. The introduction of cement created<br />

complications for, where repairs were carried out with sawn laths and a cement<br />

mixture, the panels were brittle and generally shrank away from the timber framing<br />

to cause draughts and water leaks. Because of these problems, many of the halftimbered<br />

houses were later battened all over and either weather-boarded or hung<br />

with tiles which spoiled the appearance and hid the framing timbers in unventilated<br />

spaces. When water found access to this timber, fungal decay germinated and the<br />

process of decay was commenced.<br />

Others continueq to reveal the framing timbers but replaced the wattle and daub<br />

with brick in-filling, often ornamental and many in herring-bone pattern. The problem<br />

was to provide a satisfactory joint between the wood and the masonry and with<br />

varying expansion and ,contraction due to heat and water, few houses remained<br />

draught- or waterproof for long. To those who study the cause of deterioration in<br />

ancient buildings, the incursion of moisture through the walls, whether of timber,<br />

stone, brick, chalk or other material and the capillary rise of dampness in those<br />

buildings whose foundations absorb moisture from the ground provide easily apparent<br />

reasons for fungal development, insect activity and other forms of deterioration of the<br />

building fabric. Timber in direct contact with damp masonry, soil or concrete will<br />

rarely resist the attacks of fungi and timber-destroying insects for long but the cause<br />

of such deterioration is generally obvious.<br />

Less obvious is the slow but steady deterioration which occurs in the roof and<br />

flooring timbers where no apparant water leaks have occurred and where the·timber<br />

is well away from the damp walls. Even the framing of internal stud partitions on the<br />

upper floors is frequently found to be seriously damaged by organisms which require<br />

a relatively high moisture content to flourish. When investigated, this high moisture<br />

is found to be due to condensation. In domestic buildings, considerable quantities<br />

of moisture vapour released from kitchens, laundries and even from the living rooms<br />

would rise to the upper floors and sleeping accommodation which were rarely heated.<br />

This moisture-laden air rising on thermal currents from the warmed rooms below


BIOLOGICAL DETERIORATION OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS 61<br />

would precipitate water on cold plaster and wood in the very centre of the building.<br />

With every window closed and every crack and cranny sealed against draughts, the<br />

condensing moisture would accumulate in the bedrooms andattics toproduceconditions<br />

favourable to the development of slow-acting fungi, particularly fungi imperfecti.<br />

Wood attacked by such fungi becomes susceptible to wood-devouring insect attack<br />

and in such conditions the Death Watch Beetle flourished. Few houses built in the<br />

Middle Ages or even much more recently could resist the attacks of this or other<br />

wood borers. The name "Death Watch" is said to have arisen as the result of its<br />

lnating tick being heard by watchers sitting by the bedsides of dying people. As few<br />

people recovered from serious illnesses or injuries in those days, the ticking heard by<br />

those keeping vigil seemed to be associated with death, and when heard, was thought<br />

to signify that "Death was about to cross the threshold". This tapping is, ofcourse, the<br />

luating "display" of the insect.<br />

The introduction of floor levels, particularly the covering of the original earth<br />

ground floor with timber flooring, together with plaster or wooden suspended ceilings<br />

and the internal panelling of walls, all created stagnant areas where dampness of the<br />

atmosphere could reach over-saturation point and conditions favourable to fungal<br />

spore germination were created. The Dry Rot fungus, Merulius lacrymans, would<br />

have been exceedingly rare in the period when houses were single-storied, the floors<br />

just beaten earth or possibly clay and cow-dung and even those in the great halls and<br />

castles would be of stone flags simply covered with rushes, straw or other locally<br />

obtained material; and the walls of stone, wattle and daub or chalk blocks.<br />

One common method of building walls in Hampshire was to erect two fences of<br />

boards, the fences placed parallel and about two feet or more apart, separated with<br />

lengths of wood across the space. These fences served in the manner of modern<br />

concrete shuttering and the gap between them was filled with moist and well rammed<br />

down chalk. This simple material set like a soft stone, provided good insulation,<br />

rarely became damp inside and, if well-protected by an overhanging roof, would last<br />

a very long time. Such walls are always associated with thatched houses, many of<br />

which have survived for hundreds of years. Only when the roofing thatch became<br />

seriously deteriorated, generally as the result of nesting birds and rats, and rain was<br />

allowed to fall directly on to such a wall, would it start to pulverise and break up. Once<br />

moisture penetrated, the first hard frost would cause the chalk to disintegrate completely.<br />

There are several large houses in Hampshire with walls of chalk which still survive<br />

all the hazards to which such buildings are subject but many have failed because the<br />

owners, wishing to modernise the appearance of their house, had the external faces<br />

of the walls covered with cement rendering in the form of imitation stone masonry<br />

or had them rough cast with gravel, crushed stone or pebbles. In many instances, this<br />

new surface was decorated with paint. This impermeable coating trapped condensed<br />

moisture in the walls by preventing evaporation from the external faces. This trapped<br />

moisture caused fungi to develop in the spacers or lengths of wood which originally<br />

separated the shuttering and were always left in the chalk walls. If this fungus was<br />

Merulius lacrymans it quickly spread, through the chalk to the carcassing timbers<br />

of floor and roof, and unless the owner was prepared partially to demolish and rebuild,<br />

time and time again, the house had to be vacated and eventually demolished.<br />

Even when the brick-built walls became popular in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries,<br />

it was customary to build into the brickwork at regular levels and in every wall lengths<br />

ofwood called "bondingtimbers". They served the double purpose of tying the masonry<br />

together and acting as fixings for panelling, tapestry or other internal decorations.<br />

Neglect of rainwater disposal or any other reason for the wall becoming persistently<br />

damp led to the decay of these timbers, usually with devastating con "equences.<br />

In this short paper, it is impossible to cover the whole fascinating story of biological<br />

and other causes which have deprived us of so many beautiful buildings erected by<br />

our forefathers but I hope the little I have written will help in some small measure to<br />

guide those who are anxious to conserve our priceless and irreplaceable relics of<br />

building evolution.


THE PROFESSIONAL FORESTER IN INDUSTRY •<br />

BY CRAIG ANDERSON<br />

Chairman, S.A. Timber Growers Association<br />

I AM VERY honoured indeed, as a layman, to be asked to address such a distinguished<br />

company of professional foresters as is gathered here tonight.<br />

In addressing you mayI say that some ofthe suggestions I make may be controversial<br />

and you may heartily disagree with what I have to say; if so, I crave your indulgence.<br />

Firstly, then, I am more than astonished at the manner in which a great industry<br />

such as ours employs managerial people to run, protect and exploit its forests, yet<br />

pays them a mere pittance compared with other industries. Consider the manager of a<br />

3,500 acre timber estate, the value of which is probably around R350,OOO. What will<br />

he get as a salary? The answer is probably half to a third as much as would the manager<br />

of an engineering firm of like value. Yet the existing position of forest manager is<br />

tolerated by these very managers themselves, perhaps because they feel that they are<br />

not strong enough to do anything about it. Nevertheless, are the employers not<br />

morally wrong in continuing to pay in this niggardly fashion, or is the price of timber<br />

too low to justify an improvement?<br />

My next point touches on dangerous ground, since it questions whether the university<br />

training of the professional forester is adequate and whether it is not too academic<br />

and remote to be of real practical value. Is the student taught to be a leader when he<br />

leaves university or is he merely a walking silvicultural encyclopaedia? Can he, and<br />

is he fitted to take over the running of a timber estate? Is he suited at that stage to be<br />

put over the heads of older foresters with years of experience?<br />

I feel that the answer to this question is simply that he is not capable of taking over<br />

an estate, and because of this the professional has tended, in many instances, to be<br />

disregarded by commercial forestry, which feels that it can get along without these<br />

people. This is both very unfortunate and positively ridiculous. Are there not two<br />

approaches to the big business of forestry today? Do we not have two avenues along<br />

which a professional forester can move? Firstly, that of pure research and secondly<br />

that offorestry management, and should our future students not be trained along these<br />

diverging lines according to their bent.<br />

If you will accept that what I have said has merit, then may I have the temerity to<br />

suggest we go a step further and propose a method by which both these ends could<br />

be achieved. My proposal is based partly on a doctor's training. Here we have a chap<br />

who does a five-year course for his degree, but only after he has done a further two<br />

years house work, does his degree have real value. From then onwards he may safely<br />

and often profitably adventure out into the hard world, a competent leader in his<br />

own sphere capable ofrising to any heights. Can our professional foresters not achieve<br />

the same end?<br />

Supposing, just supposing, the aspirant forester was to follow this course<br />

(1) In order to' understand what goes on in forestry and whether he likes it or not he<br />

completes one year's practical work at Saasveld.<br />

(2) Having decided to take his degree he now does three years at Stellenbosch and,<br />

after the first year, he decides whether to follow the boffin trail to pure research or<br />

the commercial trail to forestry management.<br />

(3) In the case of the boffin, after obtaining his degree, he becomes a researcher and<br />

here industry and the state must provide him with adequate funds for his work<br />

and must not interfere with his work at all.<br />

(4) In the case of the forestry management student he must have a sound silvicultural<br />

knowledge, but not in the depth taught to the boffin. He must learn to carry out<br />

work studies, plantation management and have a sound knowledge of general<br />

economics, so that, theoreticallY, he is in a position to manage an estate. Thereafter,<br />

having qualified, he too must follow the doctor's trail, and do two years of houselie<br />

An address given at a dinner of the Institute of <strong>Forestry</strong> held in Pietermaritzburg on 19th<br />

May, 1969. By courtesy ofSouth African <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal.<br />

62


THE LOCH NESS MONSTER<br />

D. G. GOWLER<br />

Executive Officer, Headquarters, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />

(By courtesy ofthe Author and the Editor ofthe Journal of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.)<br />

LOCH NESS is 24 miles ,long, up to 1t miles wide, over 700 feet deep for most of its<br />

length, and almost completely surrounded by forests. It is longer than the width of<br />

the English Channel at Dover and is four times as deep as the Channel at its deepest,<br />

and has never been known to freeze. It is situated in the Great Glen of Scotland, an<br />

enormous "rift valley" formed when the entire northern part ofScotland was wrenched<br />

sixty miles to the west following a gigantic upheaval in bygone ages. The loch was<br />

undoubtedly connected at one time to the sea, probably at both extremities, and<br />

although it is now considered a fresh-water lake, there is every possibility that at some<br />

distance below the surface there is still salt-water, a reminder of its ancient connection<br />

with the sea. (A 1,100 feet deep Canadian lake has recently been found to have a<br />

mixture ofsea-water-probably thousands ofyears old-below400 feet. Unfortunately,<br />

no such investigation has yet been carried out at Loch Ness.) Visibility in the loch is<br />

practically nil, due to the amount of peat content washed into it by the many streams<br />

and rivers entering from the surrounding countryside. The sides of the loch are<br />

extremely steep; at Cormorant Rock it plunges sharply to a depth of 236 feet just fifty<br />

feet from the bank!<br />

The loch is not, therefore, a very prepossessing sight and is a natural focus of local<br />

superstition. One can imagine local mothers chastising their children with the threat<br />

of "bogey-men" and "monsters" rising out of this sombre expanse of water and<br />

carrying off all those children who were naughty. The phenomenon of Loch Ness<br />

might well have remained as mere local superstition if it had not been for the overwhelming<br />

number ofactual sightings ofthe so-called "monster" by reputable witnesses.<br />

The Loch Ness phenomenon is by no means a recent acquisition to the fauna of<br />

Scotland. According to legend it has always harboured a "beastie" or "water kelpie";<br />

and the first written account of the creature dates way back to the middle of the sixth<br />

century A.D. when St. Columba was visiting Brude, King of the Northern Picts, at<br />

Inverness. According to Adamnan, St. Columba's biographer, writing a century after<br />

the event, the holy man reached the banks of the loch as the local inhabitants were<br />

burying one of their number who had been bitten to death by the "monster". Despite<br />

this, he instructed one of his followers to swim to the other side of the loch and return<br />

with a boat that had been moored there. The man had not been in the water long<br />

before the "monster" arrived on the scene, making a bee-line for the now panicstricken<br />

swimmer. But St. Columba muttered a few prayers and ordered the "monster"<br />

to leave the man alone. Needless to say, the "monster", on hearing the voice of the<br />

blessed man, turned tail and fled. Regular sightings of the creature have been made<br />

from that day to this.<br />

The frequency of the sightings of the animal increased tremendously in 1933, and<br />

this was solely due to the widening of a road (the A.82) along the northern side of the<br />

loch. The blasting necessary for the road's construction sent shock-waves the length<br />

and breadth of the loch and agitated the animal into an unusual outburst of activity.<br />

A Ness Fisheries Board representative estimates that every year since 1933 there have<br />

been 20 to 30 sightings reported that he would regard as genuine. The number of<br />

reports accepted as genuine and inexplicable by the Loch Ness Phenomena Investigation<br />

Bureau since 1963 has been: 1963-40, 1964-18, 1965-9, 1966-29. The modernization<br />

of the A.82 mainroad has enabled more people to have long uninterrupted looks<br />

at the loch than at any other time in history, and consequently the number ofsightings<br />

has increased considerably. Witnesses to the existence of the animal come from all<br />

walks oflife: churchmen, policemen, gamekeepers, mayors, labourers, monks, Members<br />

of Parliament, and even <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission workers!<br />

6'


66 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

:generated to force it to surface once-again. This may be an explanation of a few of the<br />

sightings ofthe L.N.M., but it is hopelessly inadequate when, as in most ofthe sightings,<br />

"the animal has been seen to move at quite rapid speeds across the surface of the loch.<br />

Turning to the "animal" explanations, we find very little in the second category arid<br />

these can be dismissed fairly easily. The most popular culprits here are the long-necked<br />

seal, the otter, and the red deer. They can all be discounted as being the.cause of the<br />

Loch Ness phenomenon purely on the question of size. But it is worth mentioning<br />

them as they can undoubtedly provide the answer to three or four of the reported<br />

sightings. The seal, like some other animals, is able to stretch its neck to quite a<br />

considerable degree, and it is a popular theory that this could account for the reports<br />

of"long necks" seen above the surface ofthe loch. No importance seems to be attached<br />

to the fact that the presence of seal is unknown in Loch Ness. The popularity of the<br />

otter theory has increased quite considerably over the past couple of years because of<br />

the support given it by a prominent naturalist. Otters can account for the one or two<br />

reports of five to eight humped sightings, but, although otters can reach a length of<br />

over 5i feet, they can in no way account for the bulk of the sightings which refer to<br />

large, powerful, solid humps up to thirty feet long. A red deer stag when swimming<br />

across the loch can fit extremely well some of the descriptions of the head and neck<br />

of the L.N.M., particularly when mention is made of two horn-like protuberances.<br />

This may account for four or five sightings.<br />

The third category is much more feasible than the second. Giant fish of all types<br />

have often been put forward as the "monster". A giant sturgeon is by far the favourite<br />

of armchair amateur detectives because a diagrammatic representation of a sturgeon<br />

lying just below the water surface with its snout and bony back ridges protruding<br />

above the surface looks very much like some ofthereports ofmany-humped "monsters".<br />

But practically all fish can be dismissed from our quest for the answer because the<br />

animal in Loch Ness must be able to survive for some time out of water to account<br />

for the sightings of it on land. Even the fish-theorists cannot explain how a 30-foot<br />

"monster" was seen to cross a main road before disappearing into the loch! Giant<br />

molluscs offer more reasonable explanations, and would account for the lack of fossil<br />

remains and the variable back postures. The Loch Ness Phenomena Investigation<br />

Bureau considers a giant marine slug as presenting fewer difficulties than any other<br />

present-day theory. Perhaps the most acceptable of the theories in this category is that<br />

of the giant eel. The larvae of eels, called leptocephali, are normally about three inches<br />

long and develop into six foot eels when "adult. In 1930, a Danish student caught a<br />

giant sea eel larva in the South Atlantic that was six feet long. Considering that the<br />

giant larva was at the same stage of development as an ordinary eel larva and that its<br />

growth must follow the same proportions, the adult sea eel emerging from this larva<br />

must reach a length of well over 60 feet. This could be the answer to the mystery of the<br />

often seen "giant sea serpent" as well as to our local Loch Ness problem. It is known<br />

th'at many ordinary eels live in Loch Ness and there seems to be no reason why their<br />

giant relations could not also be accommodated. The one stumbling block to this<br />

explanation is the sightings of the L.N.M. on land. Eels can exist out of water for<br />

a short period, but whether it can stay on land as long as the L.N.M. has been reported<br />

to do is a matter for conjecture.<br />

It seems, then, that we are left with our last category to provide us with the answer<br />

we are looking for. It is very difficult to analyze a completely unknown animal and<br />

we must approach this problem in a different way. From the evidence produced by<br />

the numerous recorded sightings, we have been able to build up a picture of what<br />

the animal in Loch Ness must look like. But what can it be? The most<br />

striking aspect is the amazing similarity it has with the prehistoric plesiosaur family.<br />

Is it a plesiosaur? It certainly has the required shape and, just as important, the right<br />

size. But scientists tell us that the plesiosaur became extinct over a hundred million<br />

years ago. This is true. But it is also true that these same scientists insisted that the<br />

coelacanth, a pre-historic fish, had died out seventy million years ago but a specimen


COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

of this was dredged up off the coast of South Africa in 1958! It therefore becomes<br />

impossible to argue that because plesiosaurs are thought to be extinct there is no<br />

chance offinding one alive today. A plesiosaur, or more probably a close relative that<br />

has adapted to its present conditions, is the only answer we have that fits all the facts<br />

in our possession. All fictional detectives have said at one time or another that the<br />

theory must be chosen to cover all the facts and not the facts to fit the theory. Sherlock<br />

Holmes often said to the ever-faithful Watson that when the impossible had been<br />

eliminated, that which was left, however improbable, must be the truth!<br />

Postscript<br />

The most important occurrence at Loch Ness since the original publication of this<br />

article was the Great Search of 1969, organised by Independent Television News and<br />

the Loch Ness Phenomena Investigation Bureau. The Search lasted two weeks and<br />

consisted mainly of sonar sweeping from both a fixed base and a moving boat. Also<br />

there to lend a helping hand was a small, yellow, home-made, fibre-glass submarine,<br />

which unfortunately proved a complete failure.<br />

In fact, the only evidence that the Great Search uncovered was found by Birmingham<br />

University who were operating a sonar fixed to Temple Pier in Urquhart Bay. The<br />

sonar looked straight across the loch which is nearly two miles wide at this point and<br />

reaches a depth of over 650 feet. The cathode ray display of the sonar was filmed at<br />

ten second intervals over the two weeks of the Search and one sequence lasting about<br />

thirteen minutes has proved to be very interesting.<br />

This sequence shows a large object rise from the bottom of the loch and then move<br />

away from the sonar out of range. The size of this object is assessed to be at least 160<br />

feet long and 65 feet high. It is not thought to have been a single object as it appeared to<br />

have individual components which dispersed slightly as it moved away. A little later<br />

the object returned and settled back into its original position, but it was not as large<br />

as in its ascent. The maximum horizontal velocity is estimated to be 6.5 knots and the<br />

maximum vertical rise about one hundred feet per minute.<br />

The fact that the object moved at a high speed in a horizontal as well as vertical plane<br />

rules out the possibility of it being inanimate. It has to be an animal, or animals, of<br />

some kind. It is not possible to say what it can be, except that it is unlikely to be fish<br />

due to the high speed of ascent and descent.<br />

The rest of this highly scientific search unfortunately produced a complete blank.<br />

Although it is interesting to note that while the technicians were fiddling around with<br />

their instruments, ten ordinary people, mainly tourists, claimed to have seen the L.N.M.!


'The Editor,<br />

The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> <strong>Review</strong>,<br />

London.<br />

SIR,<br />

CORRESPONDENCE<br />

The End of <strong>Forestry</strong> in Great Britain<br />

THE WHITE CoTFAOE,<br />

BANK,<br />

LYNDHURST,<br />

HANTS.<br />

I HAD HEARD only garbled stories of Professor Richardson's Address to the British Association<br />

for the Advancement ofScience (reprinted in your REVIEW, VoI. 49 (4), No. 142) when he and I<br />

inter alia were called upon to appear on I.T.A. to discuss what he calls environmental problems<br />

in the New Forest. It was at once clear to me, and perusal of his Address makes it more so,<br />

that whereas Prof. Richardson in some 20 years of post graduate forestry, skimming over<br />

111any foreign lands, may have picked up a kaleidoscopic understanding ofhis chosen profession,<br />

he has had quite inadequate opportunity to study the psychology of the various races, far less<br />

that of the natives of Britain.<br />

He feels a little guilt about his retreat from productive forestry but he makes a very unconvincing<br />

excuse for his adoption of his new environmental forest policy. He could be more<br />

honest: he could say that in his opinion (which few others could possibly share) productive<br />

foresty in Britain is totally unnecessary and so we might as well abandon all forms of forestry<br />

completely. But of course that would be suicidal for his Department and for himself.<br />

His only argument for continuing to foster woodlands seems to be that the tourist public<br />

wants to have its urban manners concealed behind trees. That alone shows that Richardson<br />

has made no serious attempt to study the behaviour of the city holiday-maker. The majority<br />

like the clear open spaces: they like to have a backcloth of trees, rocks or gorse bushes nearby.<br />

They do not like the interior of a Hans Andersen dark and gloomy forest, whether it be<br />

composed of conifers or of contorted and senile hardwoods. Richardson should pay personal<br />

visits to Dartmoor, Exmoor, the Peak, the open heathlands of the New Forest or even the<br />

hills immediately behind his own University of North Wales.<br />

But I concede that there is tremendous scope for integrating good forest management<br />

(including the production of very good timber) with good tourist attraction of the type which<br />

gracious Whitehall has christened "quiet recreation". I am in absolute agreement too that<br />

we shall never fully attain that integration so long as net discounted revenue has to remain the<br />

graven image at which all foresters, however unwillingly, be forced to worship. <strong>Forestry</strong> in<br />

Britain lost all faith with the Great British Public when short term profit was voiced as the<br />

top priority ideal and it will take many years and much hard work to regain their faith in a<br />

true <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission's true policy.<br />

I do not know why the principles ofmultiple land use, which had hardly begun to be properly<br />

understood, should suddenly have becomesomething"square".Afterallin this highly populated<br />

island we do genuinely need our own timber (vide all the huge new timber using industries<br />

which it has brought into gainful and socially vital existence) and we do also need quiet<br />

recreational facilities. They can both be catered for. Some forests or parts offorests can well be<br />

devoted almost entirely to bulk production: others must give much greater concessions to<br />

visitors and can be made specially attractive to visitors. That will create marvellous forests of<br />

great diversity and of great timber.<br />

Richardson seems to give no reasons at all why his urban recreations should be brought<br />

out into the forests: they would be more accessible, more suitable and thus more valuable<br />

both socially and financially if they were developed in the urban or suburban places where<br />

greater crowds would come to enjoy them. Why should we go out of our way to drag town<br />

dwelling holidaymakers out to the forests for them to enjoy their football, discotheques, zoos,<br />

hotels and old peoples' homes?<br />

Richardson should start a new series of world tours-or he could even stay in Britainto<br />

see what the seeker after "quiet recreation" and the seeker after urban pleasures really want.<br />

He can put up comfortably in his town hotel and very much later, full ofwise saws and modem<br />

instances, in his old peoples' home, having found out what the two kinds ofpeople are looking<br />

for. Never the twain need meet.<br />

Yours etc.<br />

GroaoE RYLE<br />

69


70 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

The Editor,<br />

The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> <strong>Review</strong>,<br />

London W.C.2.<br />

Production <strong>Forestry</strong> in Great Britain<br />

FOUNTAIN FORESTRY LTD.<br />

SPITCHWICK MANOR,<br />

POUNDSGATE<br />

NEWTON ABBOT<br />

DEVON.<br />

PROFESSOR RICHARDSON spoils an interesting argument by over-statement.<br />

He sets the sights for production forestry too low. If proper use is made of our land, and<br />

we fall into line with other European countries, our area under forestry will enable the establisment<br />

of far more production areas that he envisages, quite rightly, on present acreages. It is<br />

a duty of all foresters to bring about this state of affairs.<br />

At the other end of the scale, 'undoubtedly suitable woodland areas exist near our towns for<br />

capital intensive public recreational areas. But the Professor fails to make the point that huge<br />

additional capital investment is so essential to such schemes that the original forestry investment<br />

is. of ve,ry minor importance.<br />

Commercially, the woodland owner in Britain will never have the seller's market for anlenity<br />

that exists in countries like Denmark and Holland because, contrary to popular belief, there<br />

are many millions ofacres ofwild open spaces in Britain available to the public. Any practising<br />

forester who has tried to make money out of recreation without a huge injection of additional<br />

capital will confirm that no seller's market exists.<br />

Chances exist on the other hand for successful multiple use in the intermediate areas between<br />

the intensive production forests and the near-urban areas. Specialist markets, at prices which<br />

recognise the fact that a service is given, as well as cellulose supplied, will expand.<br />

Finally, it is dangerous in the extreme to assume that tropical forests will supply our needs<br />

in the years to come. Transportation costs all over the world are rising fast; the capital necessary<br />

to develop communications in tropical areas will be expensive and need to be serviced; and<br />

inhabitants of those areas will be increasing their own timber consumption-note the fact<br />

quoted in your December REVIEW that African countlies are importing more than $150 mworth<br />

of pulp and paper alone already. And the developing countries are becoming richer and<br />

therefore their labour more expensive.<br />

Yours faithfully,<br />

B. N. HOWELL


72 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

which facilitate visual comparison of different climatic regimes. In a future edition of this<br />

book, if there should be one, some standardisation of method would be most desirable so that<br />

conditions in different countries could be compared on a meaningful basis.<br />

In many of the monographs, geological and soil factors have been described in great detail,<br />

sometimes to the point of irrelevancy. While a good knowledge of the soil and site typology<br />

and particularly of those factors directly affecting afforestation and the growth of trees is<br />

essential, geological and soil descriptions need to be kept in balance and not allowed to become<br />

displays of erudition of interest only to geologists and pedologists. The concise descriptions of<br />

the geology and soils of the Middle East countries by Oedekoven set an example and are very<br />

much to the point. It is curious, however, that, throughout the book, so little is said about<br />

nutrient deficiencies and fertiliser requirements, and no mention at all is made of minor<br />

element deficiencies such as boron which is often so important to the Browth and even survival<br />

of Eucalyptus plantations in N. Africa.<br />

The accounts of the hydrology of the arid areas turn out to be particularly interesting and<br />

important. Whether rivers are perennial or flowing only for short periods, the occurrence of<br />

flash floods and erosion etc. emphasise the needs for protection forestry. The presence or<br />

absence of underground soil moisture within reach of the roots of planted trees determines in<br />

many cases what species can or cannot be grown and what level ofproduction can be expected.<br />

Similarly, the availability or otherwise of irrigation can completely alter the prospects of<br />

economic forestry in arid areas. .<br />

The descriptions of the natural vegetation in the various countries are mostly suitable for<br />

the purpose and generally emphasise the physiognomic rather than the floristic aspects of the<br />

flora. This, together with the descriptions of the soils and relief, gives a clear picture of the<br />

conditions affecting any schemes of afforestation.<br />

The sections on human occupation and forms of land use are very important as determining<br />

the needs of the population and the purposes and aims of afforestation. In most countries the<br />

protective aims, e.g. preventing wind and water erosion or amelioration of climatic conditions<br />

have high priority. In productive forestry, the provision offirewood is frequently of over-riding<br />

importance, coupled in some cases with poles for house-building and wood for agricultural<br />

implements. The production of timber for industrial processing usually does not come into the<br />

picture at all in these very dry areas.<br />

The greatest ,interest to foresters lies in the sections dealing with the choice of species,<br />

techniques of afforestation and the results achieved. Here again, the reports from different<br />

countries are very variable and reflect the amount of systematic research that has been done<br />

in them. Particularly full and informative accounts have been given for the U.S.A. (by<br />

Stoeckler), Australia (by 10hnston and Hall), Southern Sahara and Sahel (by Fishwick),<br />

and India/Pakistan (by Kaul), but there is something to be learnt from almost all the reports.<br />

It is curious, for instance, that in the U.S.A., where afforestation ofarid areas is highly efficient<br />

and to a large extent mechanised, the use of polythene containers is only mentioned as an<br />

experimental idea whereas it is in general use in arid zone afforestation in Africa and most<br />

other countries in the eastern hemisphere, where the method is regarded as a break-through,<br />

eliminating nursery risks and ensuring higher survival in the field than any other method.<br />

From India comes the interesting suggestion that the "chlorophyll stability index" of a species<br />

or of a provenance can be used as a valid criterion for making initial selections for droughthardiness<br />

for planting in places where the trees will be growing near the threshold of survival.<br />

(CSI is not here defined nor is the method for its determination given.)<br />

In all countries where water is in short supply, the methods of ground preparation are of<br />

vital importance, both for catching and conserving what little rainfall there is and ensuring<br />

that as much of it as possible is made available to the planted trees, and also for removing<br />

initial competition ofexisting vegetation and producing conditions where clean weeding during<br />

the early stages ofestablishment can be done economically. Many different methods ofcarrying<br />

out these operations are described by the various countries and make interesting comparative<br />

reading.<br />

Special mention must be made ofthe two reports by M. Petrov on the U.S.S.R. and Central<br />

Asia respectively. Closely written in highly technical language and using a number of local<br />

terms unfamiliar to English readers, (the Editor could have helped by providing definitions),<br />

they give a great wealth of detail about the arid areas of these countries, the formidable problems<br />

they have had to face and the truly remarkable results they have achieved often under<br />

exceedingly difficult conditions. Emphasis is laid on a full knowledge of the typology of the<br />

sites before attempting reclamative afforestation. Techniques have been developed for controlling<br />

shifting sands under cold desert conditions to an extent unmatched anywhere. The


74 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

even if their eventual use is only firewood. Many of the other eucalypts at first glance are well<br />

outside their normal site requirements.<br />

Turning to conifers one wonders why they should even be considered in drought prevalent<br />

areas where fire is regarded as an agricultural instrument and a careless match could eliminate<br />

large areas. One may further question the use ofcallitris which may survive on poor soil but is<br />

itself a soil impoverisher. (Personal experience. Patana plantations, Ceylon.)<br />

An angle which is not discussed in the paper is the future status of successfully established<br />

areas. Growing timber, poles or firewood on a bare forest floor does not solve the problem.<br />

The establishment of a woody undergrowth is essential if soil improvement is to be attained<br />

and conditions established for the eventual planting of a more lucrative crop. Incidentally<br />

no mention is made of the use of Acioa barteri as either a fire break or as a nurse crop. Has<br />

this been tried?<br />

E.W.M.<br />

World Timbers. Vo!. 3, Asia and Australia and New Zealand. Compiled and Edited<br />

by B. J. Rendle. Ernest Benn Ltd. £5.25.<br />

THIS IS THE third and final volume of Mr. Rendle's World Timbers series. Like the two earlier<br />

volumes the standard of production, binding and presentation of coloured plates are of the<br />

highest order.<br />

In his Introduction the Editor says "Many species ofeconomic significance in their countries<br />

of origin have had to be omitted-". This is undoubtedly true, so much so that after a perusal<br />

of the volume one is left with the impression that it might well have been expanded to two<br />

separate volumes, one covering Asia and the other Australia and New Zealand, to give a fuller<br />

world coverage of better known timbers. In spite of this comment foresters and timbermen,<br />

not forgetting students, are indebted to Mr. Rendle for his presentation of World Timbers<br />

in the three volumes now published.<br />

Each timber is, as in the earlier volumes, described in some detail, its structural properties,<br />

working properties, durability and uses are effectively described. A minor criticism in this<br />

context; the sapwood ofEast Indian Satinwood is very noticeable even in a freshly cut log and<br />

in months, rather than years, decays and comes away cleanly from the heartwood if untreated<br />

and exposed to the weather.<br />

In the Asian section the old-world timbers from India, Burma and Ceylon mingle with the<br />

more recently publicised Dipterocarps of Malaysia. In the Australian section there are the<br />

better known Eucalypts, the indigenous conifers of Australia and New Zealand and, that ubiquitous<br />

exotic, Radiata pine.<br />

The two previous volumes have been well received by the technical Press. In conclusion one<br />

can only say that the three volumes now provide a standard reference work on World Timbers<br />

a work which should stand the test of time.<br />

E.W.M.<br />

Native Trees of Canada. By R. C. Hosie. Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service: Department of<br />

Fisheries and <strong>Forestry</strong>. Queen's Printer for Canada, Ottawa (1969). Seventh Edition,<br />

completely re-written and re-illustrated. Pp. 380, lavishly illustrated with some 26<br />

photos in full colour and 750 in black-and-white, plus 200 line drawings and 150<br />

sketch maps. Price $5 paper-bound, $8 cloth bound.<br />

THIS STANDARD TEXTBOOK first appeared in 1917 under the authorship of Messrs Morton and<br />

Lewis. It has now been completely re-shaped by an impressive ten-man team of foresters,<br />

botanists, photographers and artists, headed by"Mr. Hosie, and the result is great credit to the<br />

Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service, as well as to all who took part. It covers every tree native to the<br />

Dominion, but no introduced exotic kinds.<br />

The main body of the text consists of two-page illustrated descriptions for a single tree, and<br />

no fewer than 140 kinds are treated in this way. A typical entry includes a silhouette drawing of<br />

the growing tree, and a map ofits natural distribution. Foliage, bark, winter twigs, flowers and<br />

fruit are each shown by eight or ten photos, and features that aid identification are separately<br />

depicted. The standard pattern of text includes growth form, habitat, size, leaves, flowers,<br />

fruit, twigs, bark, wood, general importance in the woodland scene, and some fascinating<br />

discursive notes on some topic peculiar to each tree.<br />

More general chapters describe the forests of Canada and their nine characteristic regions,<br />

and tell the beginner how trees may be recognised. There are comprehensive descriptions of


76 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Untersuehung uOOr forstliche Konzessionen. Ein Beitrag zur Forderung der Forstwirt..<br />

schaft in den Entwicldungslandern. By F. Schmithuesen (1969). Schriftenreihe der<br />

Landesforstverwaltung Baden-Wurttemberg, Band 30, Stuttgart.<br />

THE AUTHOR BASES his thesis on timber concessions onfirst-hand information which he gathered<br />

during a year in British Columbia and a year in tropical Latin America. The material is complemented<br />

by a source study at Oxford, Nogent-sur-Marne and Rome. The general survey<br />

of the legal situation in the boreal and tropical countries emphasises the differences of land<br />

tenure in countries with English, 'French or Iberian legal tradition. Consequently, legal provisions<br />

and technical organisation of forest utilisation vary considerably. Also, the capacity<br />

for meeting forest owners requirements varied widely between individuals and types of concessionaires.<br />

Equal and uniform treatment is, therefore, often impossible. Concessions are<br />

the only practicable form of organising forest utilisation in tropical countries, in which forest<br />

land is predominantly publicly owned, and in which infrastructure, governmental organisation,<br />

industry and domestic markets are poorly developed. The author surveys management and<br />

organisational practices of the concession systems in the more important timber-producing<br />

countries in the tropics and in North America. He compares the historical development of<br />

the various systems and includes a comparison to the concession system of 18th century<br />

Germany. The author believes that any concession system will enventually be replaced by sale<br />

of standing or logged timber by the forest owner. This would mean state forestry in most<br />

tropical and many boreal countries. An alternative would be the transfer of responsibility<br />

for all forestry operations to the concessionaire under long-term leases. In the reviewers<br />

opinion, the latter alternative offers greater advantages from a business and a national economic<br />

point-of-view, but the former will probably in the long run enjoy political preference. The<br />

value of the book to tropical foresters is the synoptic review of problems and practices of the<br />

concession systems within and outside the tropics. The inclusion of the historical concession<br />

systems ofCentral Europe adds an interesting time perspective to the problem.<br />

The conclusion emerges convincingly that direction and momentum of forestry development<br />

in tropical countries will be determined by the wiIJingness or capability of governments to<br />

guarantee tenure and supplies at a scale and under conditions which make long-term industrial<br />

developments in the form ofintegrated forest industries feasible.<br />

E. F. BRUNIG<br />

Flora Zambesiaca, Vol. 3, part 1. J. P. M. Brenan et al. Crown Agents for Overseas<br />

Governments and Administrations, London (1970). Price £1.25.<br />

THE APPEARANCE OF another part of this excellent Flora is most welcome. The four earlier parts<br />

appeared in 1960, 1961, 1963 and 1966, so the interval between successive parts has steadily<br />

increased by a year at a time. This is clearly an unsatisfactory situation which, I understand,<br />

has arisen from administrative difficulties and not from a slowing-down in the botanical<br />

preparation. There is, I believe, a good deal of material awaiting publication, and it is greatly<br />

to be hoped that arrangements will be made to speed up the publication of this Flora, which<br />

is of basic importance to foresters and others concerned with biological natural resources in<br />

this part of Africa.<br />

The recent part consists of the Mimosoideae, and is mainly the work of Mr. Brenan. As this<br />

group has now been done for the Flora ofTropical East Africa, the Flore du Congo Beige, the<br />

Conspectus Florae Angolensis and the revised Flora of West Tropical Africa, it must be one of<br />

the best known ofall groups offlowering plants in tropical Africa. The subfamily is represented<br />

by 15 genera in Flora Zambesiaca, including the genera Acacia (with 64 species) and Albizia<br />

(with 19 species). As all who know something about tropical African botany will appreciate,<br />

Mr. Brenan's authorship of this part is a sure guarantee of excellence, and this is indeed<br />

a model of what a flora should be.<br />

R. W. J. KEAY<br />

Standard Volume Tables for Coniferous Species of Northern West Pakistan Forest<br />

Record No. 2 1969.<br />

Local Volume Tables of the Coniferous Species of Northern West Pakistan By<br />

Muhammad Azam Malik. Forest Record No. 3 1970. Forest Research Series,<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Research Division, Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar.<br />

THESE TWO PUBLICATIONS mark an important advance in Pakistan forestry. A sound basis on<br />

which to estimate the volume ofgrowing stock is ofsuch obvious importance for the planning<br />

and control of the national forest estate that justification for these publications is hardly


NEW BOOKS AND PUBLICATIONS 77<br />

necessary. The general volume tables previously in use were issued by the Indian Forest<br />

Institute forty years ago, and it is known that they were of very doubtful reliability when<br />

applied to the forests ofWest Pakistan.<br />

Tables are given for Cedrus deodora, Pinus grifJithii, P. roxburghii, Abies pindrow and Picea<br />

smithiana. The region was classified into eight catchment areas in each of which at least 200<br />

trees of each species were measured. Sites on which sample trees were selected were classified<br />

into strata (four in the case of Deodar and six for the other species), based on altitude and<br />

aspect to ensure an overall sample representative of the region. Volume was calculated from<br />

the regression V==a+bH+cD2+dD2H (where V==volume under bark, D==diameter at<br />

breast height and H==total height) in all cases. This model was selected as the most suitable<br />

from a number tested in a previous study. Both total and stem-wood volumes (down to an<br />

8-inch diameter point), excluding branchwood, were fitted to this model. Some difficulty was<br />

encountered in reconciling inconsistencies between the total and stem-wood volume tables so<br />

derived. Therefore small-wood volumes (the difference between total volume and stem-wood<br />

volume) were related graphically to diameter (height being shown to be unimportant) and<br />

separate small-wood single entry tables obtained. Either the total volume regression or the stem<br />

volume regression was chosen as the basis for a particular table and the other table (total or<br />

stem volume) derived by subtraction or addition, as appropriate, of the small-wood volume.<br />

This method was preferred, in the reviewer's view mistakenly, to a regression method relating<br />

stem volume to total volume for any size class. Sets oftables for all three "volumes" are printed<br />

in full.This appears unnecessary as only two sets give independent information. The expense<br />

saved could have been better spent in improving the legibility of the essential tables. As it is,<br />

the print size in some of the larger tables (produced by an offset process) is incoveniently small.<br />

One of the main advantages of the regression method of volume table construction is its<br />

flexibility and the ease in which additional data can be incorporated to improve the relationships<br />

between volume and the easily measured variables diameter and height. It is hoped,<br />

therefore, that provision will be made for the regular updating and checking of the tables<br />

in order to improve their precision and reliability as further data become available. It would<br />

have been reassuring if some reference to future revision had been made.<br />

The Local Volume tables published separately as Forest Record No. 3 are derived directly<br />

from the general volume tables using the quadratic relationship H=a+bD+cD2. These are<br />

produced for easy application in the field by local staff.<br />

The Pakistan Forest Institute is to be congratulated on the production of these tables and<br />

we look forward to seeing a further publication in this new series ofForest Records.<br />

P. G. ADLARD<br />

My Life My Trees. Richard St. Barbe Baker, Lutterworth Press, London, £2.00.<br />

IN 1944 RICHARD ST. BARBE BAKER wrote his first autobiography-I Planted Trees. Now in 1970<br />

as an octogenarian he writes his second autobiography. This latter work like the earlier one<br />

starts in his boyhood days and with the last 24 years gives a story of three-quarters<br />

of a century of dedication to tree-planting and conservation. Throughout the book the author<br />

keeps pace with world thinking and world trends towards trees and conservation. During<br />

his long active life he visited most parts of the World, firstly as a Colonial Forest Officer, later<br />

as a free-lance self appointed high priest of conservation. Kenya-the Aberdare Mountains;<br />

Nigeria-Sapoba; the Redwoods of America; Canada; India; Pakistan; the Saharan Territories;<br />

all figure in his many world-wide peregrinations. At the age of 74 we find him doing a<br />

solo ride of some 1200 miles from North to South of New Zealand, now his adopted home.<br />

During much of his career professional forest officers have tended to denigrate many of his<br />

activities on the grounds that they were not original. There may be a certain amount of truth<br />

in this but at least he had the courage of his convictions and preached what he believed. In<br />

his long life ofconservation crusading he has devoted all his energies to planting trees, whether<br />

on original, right or wrong lines does not in one iota detract from his self-dedication to his<br />

cause.<br />

Throughout the book is woven the story of The Men 0/the Trees founded by the author in<br />

Kenya in 1924, and now a well-established and flourishing national body. Richard S1. Barbe<br />

Baker will be remembered for this long after petty squabbles over the authenticity of some<br />

of his claims are forgotten.<br />

Peach stones in the Sahara, let us regard these as symbolic.<br />

E.W.M.


78 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

1969 Bulletin of the Nigerian <strong>Forestry</strong> Departments<br />

IT IS MOST interesting to read a Bulletin after an interval of perhaps fifteen years. It has grown<br />

up and is vastly different from the old Home Chat of earlier days. So too has the Research<br />

Department developed. D. R. Rosevear describes, with interesting reminiscences, his school,<br />

the first Forest School in Nigeria, for Eastern Provinces Forest Guards in the middle 1920s;<br />

R. W. J. Keay recollects some highlights ofhis years at the Forest School for Forest Assistants<br />

in the middle 194Os, when teaching required more supporting research, and to indicate present<br />

standards the Staff disposition of the Federal Research Department at the end of 1969 lists<br />

no fewer than 61 officers ofvarious kinds, plus 7 FAO officers at the Savanna Research Station.<br />

There is an obituary notice about G. A. E. Ogbe, CCF. Mid-West, an appreciation of the<br />

services of J. G. C. Allen, retiring Secretary of the Nigerian Timber Association and a list of<br />

eight International Seminars and Conferences attended by Forest Dept. delegates-changed<br />

days from the old five-yearly high spot of Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences.<br />

There are reports on Triplochiton scleroxylon provenance trials, an Elephant survey in<br />

Yankari Game Reserve, a preliminary survey offauna in a proposed Lake Chad Game Reserve<br />

andan extract speech about the Plantation Industry and its Management given at an Agricultural<br />

Society of Nigeria annual conference. To my mind the most valuable item is a paper extracted<br />

from Unasylva Vol. 22(4) No. 91 1968 on Artificial regeneration within the humid Lowland<br />

Tropical Forest by A. F. A. Lamb.<br />

N.S.S.<br />

ANNUAL REPORTS<br />

Fiftieth Annual Report of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain. 1969-70. H.M.S.O.<br />

70pnet<br />

THE FORESTRY COMMISSION has rung in its semi-centenary by producing a review in a new and a<br />

far more readable style than any ofits predecessors. The text is confined purely to the year under<br />

report without giving any commentary on the Commission's fifty years of not unremarkable<br />

achievement. (But incidentally Lord Lovat was the first Chairman of the Commissioners, not<br />

Lord Clinton as stated on page 23. The latter did not in fact succeed to that post until seven<br />

years later.)<br />

There is a little typographical confusion between the <strong>Forestry</strong> Enterprise (i.e. the State<br />

forest operations) and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Authority (Le. the government sponsored encouragement<br />

to private forestry, research and education) butthe dual role is getting clearer and some analytical<br />

editing and changing of captions should correct any confusion in future years.<br />

In the 49th Report it was stated that future expansion of State forests was expected to lie<br />

mainly in North Scotland, but in fact South Scotland is making far better progress and prospects<br />

of future land acquisition there are encouraging. Economically this will be to the good because<br />

growth potential and marketing will be better. Nevertheless, taking Britain as a whole the rate<br />

of land acquisition (34,145 acres) again fell far short of the rate of afforestation (45,727 acres).<br />

It is such a pity that there are artificial restrictions to acquisitions in England and it is high<br />

time that they should be broken down.<br />

Production and marketing continue to show healthy trends. Although there has been an<br />

80 per cent increase in average wage rates since 1960, there has been a corresponding 90 per<br />

cent increase in output per man, due of course to the introduction of more sophisticated<br />

machinery. In the same period the output of sawlogs, as comp&.red with smaller specifications,<br />

has risen from 18.3 per cent to 31.4 per cent. Pitwood now accounts for a mere 9 per cent of the<br />

total sales.<br />

The industrial staff directly employed by the Commission fell from 8,321 to 7,487 in a year,<br />

but as we are not told how many men are employed by timber merchants and contractors<br />

working in the forests and on transportation it is not possible to discuss the employment value<br />

of forestry as compared with other forms of rural land use. Rather less than half of the exploitation<br />

is by way of selling standing to the home timber trade and a very much smaller<br />

proportion ofcultural operations is conducted by contractors.


ANNUAL REPORTS 79<br />

This report gives greater space to the recreational use of the forests and the separate section<br />

dealing with the accounts shows the financial implications thereof, thus:-<br />

Thousands of £<br />

Expenditure Receipts<br />

Fishing & shooting ... ... ... ... ... 37 72<br />

Camp sites ... ... ... ... ... ... 75 66<br />

Other recreational facilities ... ... ... 255 69<br />

-- --<br />

Total ... ... 367 207<br />

-- --<br />

These figures probably include capital expenditure but the overhead expenses of £181,000<br />

seem to be an excessive proportion within the total and the greater part of that goes on the<br />

non-remunerative but very important "other recreational facilities". On the credit side it is<br />

fair to say that one hears little but the highest praise for the way the Commission is offering its<br />

countryside to the people. Town planners tend to ask whether in this over-populated island<br />

we need forests or whether they should not be turned over entirely to make recreational areas.<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission is proving in a practical way that we can have both. We certainly<br />

need both. But there is still an awful lot to be learned about the amount ofcompromise needed<br />

to strike the right balance between just wood and human satisfactions. There must be enormous<br />

variations between different parts of Britain. Here again there comes a strong argument for<br />

faster forest development in England where production and more dense recreational facilities<br />

can be fitted into juxtaposition.<br />

Private forest expansion, now very heavily weighted by the work ofinvestment organisations,<br />

has increased to some 47,000 acres, or about 10,000 acres more than the figure of 1967.<br />

G. B. RYLE.<br />

Rhodesia <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission-Fifteenth Annual Report and Accounts for the year<br />

1st July 1968 to 30th June 1969<br />

THE COMMISSION'S PRIMARY function is to grow, produce and sell Pine and Eucalypt timbers.<br />

These operations have to be run, and accounted for, on a business footing. In the year under<br />

report the Commission's trading activities covered its expenditure to the extent of £576,856,<br />

and it found in all from its own resources a total of £816,663, or 72 per cent of its expenditure<br />

overall. These amounts show an increase on those of previous years. During the year, however,<br />

useful additional finance was provided by the Government for the Commission's further trading<br />

activities. TheCommissionalso undertakes a number ofactivities"on behalfoftheGovernment"<br />

such as nlost Government forest departments would be expected to perform. For these the<br />

Commission receives grants (or rather, reimbursements) separately. The report indicates that<br />

these have not been increased to meet growing needs (but that is a very familiar story). One<br />

activity whose importance the report stresses is forestry in the Tribal Trust Lands, where the<br />

support is stated to have been very good. In the main the report indicates useful progress but<br />

no major changes from the years immediately preceding.<br />

Professional staff was increased by 2 to 19; technical staff remained at 25 with 3 more in<br />

training; increases are recorded in both clerical and accounting staffs. Other employees and<br />

labourers increased by some 140 making a total of 1,854.<br />

The area of demarcated forest remained at 2,340,193 acres. 2,232 acres were planted (2,208<br />

of them conifers), and 1,001 clear felled, making the Commission's total area of plantations<br />

39,293 acres (of which 35,201 were conifers) at the end of the year. Rhodesia incidentally is<br />

stated to have, in addition, 215,000 acres of plantations in private ownership (94,000 acres of<br />

conifers, 70,000 of Eucalypts, and 51,000 of wattle). The report does not give a picture of the<br />

tinlber economy of the country as a whole. The Commission's plantations are almost all<br />

situatedin the highlands oftheEasternconservancy, along Rhodesia's border with Mozambique.<br />

Nearly 7,000 acres were weeded, not quite 5,000 acres were thinned, nearly 6,000 acres 'Here<br />

pruned. Silviculture evidently had not been neglected.<br />

There were 54 fires in the indigenous (protected) woodlands, but despite the bad season for<br />

fires little was lost in the plantations. Indeed, the record of miles of fireguards cleared and of<br />

acres early-burned (as a protective measure) indicates that fire protection was not neglected<br />

either.<br />

Indigenous hardwood production (Baikiaea plurijuga, Guibourtia coleospema, Pterocarpus


80 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

angolensis) at 3,200,000 cubic feet was six per cent up on the previous year. Softwood produced<br />

by the Commission was 2,756,000 cubic feet, a small amount more than in the year before.<br />

Rhodesia seems to have been running into the difficulty, not unknown elsewhere of finding a<br />

market for low-grade softwood resulting from thinnings in immature plantations.<br />

The Commission's advisory and extension work was limited by lack of funds. However, in<br />

another direction "Major progress in housing staff and labour in the Eastern Conservancy is<br />

reported".<br />

The feature of the year's work of most interest to outside readers is that of the Research<br />

Branch. Or.dinarily that is made the subject of a separate report in this, the Annual Report, it<br />

has been only briefly summarised. A new Research centre was built and opened at Salisbury.<br />

With it has gone the setting up a ofa seed centre, and the rationalising of collections from seed<br />

orchards, which have started to yield appreciable amounts of seed; more seed orchards (of<br />

Pinus khasya, P.palustris, P.patula and P.elliottU) have been started. New species introduced<br />

include Arancaria hunstenii, P.patula x greggii, races of P.merkussii, P.oocarpa, P.caribaea<br />

var bahamensis and Eucaluptus deglupta. Provenance trials with seven species are mentioned,<br />

and reference is made to work on breeding material, progeny trials, increment studies and<br />

volume tables.<br />

This report, like its predecessors, simply tells one what the Commission has done, and spent,<br />

during the year. In the circumstances, its year's work is commendable. One looks forward to<br />

the time when one can read an account ofits relation to the timber economy of the country as a<br />

whole, and even, perhaps, be given the still wider view ofthe valuable role of forests and woodlands<br />

in land use all over Rhodesia.<br />

CONTRIBUTED.<br />

Annual Report of the Forest Research Institute, New' Zealand Forest Service for 1969.<br />

THE INSTITUTE IS TO BE congratulated on an impressive year's work. For your reviewer, who<br />

was closely concerned with it in its infancy, the progress in the provision of research buildings<br />

is a source of much pleasure. It is gratifying to know that the temporary structures and<br />

improvised facilities which have had to serve for over 20 years are at last being superseded.<br />

The opportunity for an exercise in public relations offered by the official opening during the<br />

year of Stage I, buildings for Forest Products research, was eagerly grasped and obtained an<br />

excellent response. Extra effort, too, has been put into dissemination of research information<br />

in other ways, but, as the Director points out, there is always room for more. The series of<br />

symposia on silvicultural problems in which commercial, State and private forestry interests<br />

participate, was continued. The theme, Land Preparation, was particularly appropriate with<br />

future very large afforestation programmes in view.<br />

As they contribute some 90 per cent of the country's timber output, major research effort<br />

was directed to the problems of the man-made forests. These are being tackled over a very<br />

wide range, from culture and handling of nursery stock to the use of new species for papers<br />

making. The tree improvement programme now includes Pseudatsuga menziesii, Pinuselliottii<br />

var el/iottii, P. taeda and P. contorta as well as P. radiata and examination for wood<br />

quality has become routine in screening plus trees and clonal material. Although Dothistroma<br />

pini has not been completely contained its initial rapid spread has slowed down and there is<br />

evidence that the vigorous empirical control measures begun a few years ago have been<br />

broadly effective.<br />

It is of interest to note that there has been a growth response in terrace rimu forests of the<br />

West Coast ofthe South Island within a few years ofharvesting about one-third of the original<br />

standing volume in selection fellings.<br />

While allowing that this report has a great deal to tell, its length is somewhat daunting.<br />

It is suggested that the highlights of groups of closely related projects concerning several<br />

research officers could sometimes be summarised.<br />

F.A.<br />

Forest Insect and Disease Survey, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service. Annual Report for the<br />

year 1969<br />

NO VERY WIDESPREAD EPIDEMICS of either insect pests or diseases occurred in Canadian forests<br />

during 1969, but some caused severe damage in various localities and others were sufficiently<br />

prevalent to give rise to anxiety.<br />

Among the insects the most important were the spruce budworm (Choristoneurafumiferana),<br />

the jack-pine budworm (C. pinu8 pinus) and the larch sawfly (Pristiphora erichsonii). There


82 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

The chapter on Plantation Management reveals that in the period of the Report 3,768<br />

morgen of State Forest and 2,593 morgen of S.A.B.T. forests were afforested bringing the<br />

total plantation areas to 267,174 morgen and 38,109 morgen respectively. Of the plantation<br />

areas no less than 90 per cent consist of conifers headed by P. elliottii closely followed by<br />

P. patula, P. radiata and P. pinaster in that order. The remaining 10 per cent is predominantly<br />

eucalypts with E. saligna predominating.<br />

The extent of plantation production of saw-logs is shown in Table 5A, a total of 38,566,433<br />

cu. ft. was produced, of this slightly over 10,000,000 cu. ft. was sawn in State sawmills with a<br />

recovery factor of49 per cent. The recovery factor from the private sector is not given. Against<br />

these figures the output of saw logs from indigenous forests was a mere 95,000 cu. ft.<br />

There is a very long chapter on Forest Research. Strength, suitability and seasoning tests<br />

for a variety of purposes were carried out on various plantation species, particularly on the<br />

species mentioned above. Tree breeding research is also very much to the fore. Space does not<br />

permit ofelaborate details, suffice to say the Department is handling a wide range ofinvestigations<br />

which must hold much of interest for those concerned with exotics in other territories.<br />

The expenditure shown against Forest Research in Form 6A is a mere R34,644, it is felt this<br />

is not a fair reflection of the activities of the Department devoted to Research.<br />

In the Chapter on Finance the total cost of running the Department and its ancillary<br />

activities is shown as R13,948,963 as against a total revenue of R12,142,805. Both figures<br />

show an increase on previous years but the gap has been reduced and the time when the<br />

Department produces a surplus should not be many years ahead.<br />

E.W.M.<br />

British Columbia Forest Service, Annual Report 1969<br />

IT IS VERY EASY to write complimentary remarks about this Report. A "glossy" production,<br />

colour photographs, easily digested format and, most important, it covers the year ending<br />

31st December 1969, yet was submitted to the Lieut-Governor in March 1970.<br />

In keeping with modern practice the Report opens with a synopsis of the year's highlights in<br />

the fornl ofthe ChiefForester's Report. A reviewer could in fact base the whole ofhis comments<br />

on this one page. To quote a few highlights: forest revenue increased by 66 per cent, pulp,<br />

paper and allied industries' production was up by 10 per cent and, the total volume of timber<br />

harvested was up by a similar 10 per cent. The situation as regards forest fires was anunfortunate<br />

one, 2318 fires burnt 407,000 acres as against a mere 34,000 acres destroyed in the previous<br />

year. Correspondingly the cost of fire fighting increased from $790,000 in 1968 to $3,700,000<br />

in 1969. During the year 25 million seedlings were planted by the Forest Service and industry,<br />

all seedlings being produced in Forest Service nurseries. Production and planting is planned<br />

to reach 75 million by 1975.<br />

Turning to the body of the report the Inventory Division shows continued progress. No<br />

less than 13 million acres of "public sustained-yield units (P.S.Y.U.)", a designation we<br />

interpret as meaning-productive forest reserves, were inventoried during the year bringing<br />

the total to date to 84,000,000 acres; it is planned to complete this work by 1975.<br />

The Research Division, again in keeping with modern trends, concentrated on Tree Improvement<br />

Studies with Douglas Fir as the chief species under investigation. On the subject of<br />

Research an interesting financial aspect shown in Appendix (145) is that expenditure on<br />

Research amounted to approximately one tenth of that incurred on silvicultural operations.<br />

Not all will agree but we consider this an ideal state of affairs in such a developed forest<br />

territory.<br />

The financial section of any annual report is always of interest; sometimes because of what<br />

it reveals, sometimes of what it conceals. This particular report shows the financial situation<br />

in two straightforward Tables (Appendices 144 and 145). According to these which are actually<br />

for the fiscal year 1968 ...69 and not for the year covered by the report, revenue amounted to<br />

$64 million as against an expenditure of $24 million, a very gratifying surplus of $40 million.<br />

One possible reason for this pleasing situation may arise from the fact that the Forest Service<br />

is not responsible for any form of recreational amenities, hunting, shooting, fishing etc.;<br />

activities which appear to take pride of place and effort in some Canadian States.<br />

The various volume statistics are all in cubic feet or board measure and not "bedevilled"<br />

by Hoppus.<br />

A most interesting and readable report.<br />

B.W.M.


ANNUAL REPORTS 85<br />

to have a high germination percentage in one week only." A new and unexpected hazard in<br />

securing natural regeneration or seed of this species!<br />

Besides the damage to seed occurring in Triplochiton this was also noted in Terminalia<br />

ivorensis (another curculionid also unidentified) and the Forest Entomology section gives a<br />

very interesting report both on these and other pests, including their predators and parasites,<br />

a very wide field which was untapped ten years ago.<br />

In the Wood Chemistry and Preservation Section I learned that Acacia nilotica occurs in<br />

Northern Ghana a fact of which I was not aware. Also that a means of getting the Daniel/ia<br />

to yield resin regularly and not at its own whim, on which I had made some unsuccessful<br />

trials in the thirties, was still insolved. The Wood Seasoning and Industries Section are testing<br />

a Solar Kiln, and are also making wood-wool slabs and testing them as a potential building<br />

material.<br />

The funds available for the Institute, NC 270,000 (1£135,000) recurrent annual expenditure<br />

and NC 85,000 (?£42,500) for development are not excessive and from the report Ghana is<br />

getting good value in research on one of her major assets.<br />

A.F.<br />

REPUBLIC OF IRELAND<br />

Report of the Minister for Lands on <strong>Forestry</strong> for the period from 1st April, 1967 to<br />

31st March, 1969.<br />

IN TWENTY-SEVFN pages of text and 12 appendices this report gives a clear picture of the work<br />

done during the two year period covered. The length of the period, presumably an economy<br />

measure, means that half of the information is only of historical interest. The 134 paragraphs<br />

are commendably short and make it easy to abstract information; while comparative tables<br />

in the text indicate trends from 1952 onwards:<br />

Planting remained fairly steady between the economy figure of20,000 acres and the restored<br />

target of 25,000 acres; and as usual the county with the highest afforestation rate was County<br />

Cork. The acquisition of suitable land is becoming progressively more difficult and a new<br />

system of valuation, based on potential timber yield, is now being used with the result that<br />

higher prices are able to be offered. By far the greater part of the land acquired was in the<br />

western counties.<br />

Of species planted, conifers comprised 95 per cent, Sitka spruce alone constituting 54 per<br />

cent. In view of the five per cent of broadleaved trees planted the establishment of plots of<br />

selected plants of birch under tree improvement schemes was obviously a special project of<br />

which details are not given.<br />

Interesting departures from normal practice in the maintenance of plantations are the use of<br />

hedges instead of fencing and a new technique by which brashing, marking, and thinning are<br />

apparently all done at the same time. Brashing is confined to selected (final crop) trees. Details<br />

are not given but it will be interesting to hear more of this method.<br />

Rabbits appear to be a pest ofminor proportions but wild goats caused damage in one forest.<br />

Deer have access to a quarter of the country's forests and these are mainly fallow. Sika are<br />

well established in Wicklow and Kerry but the indigenous red deer is fighting for survival.<br />

Control and conservation by proper management is the aim of the department.<br />

A report on timber processing and the possibility of expanding outlets was commissioned<br />

in 1966 and the report was completed in.1968. This offers little immediate prospect of improveruent<br />

in the situation and recommends that "piecemeal ad hoc industrial projects should not<br />

be encouraged".<br />

Two trends are discernible that parallel similar developments in Britain-both the numbers<br />

of men in direct employment and the length of new forest roads completed continue to fall<br />

steadily. The size of the annual budget increases with equal regularity, although the trend is<br />

reversed on some individual items. For example the cost of acquiring land has fallen with the<br />

increasing difficulty in finding suitable areas and grants to private forestry have also fallen. The<br />

reason for the latter movement is not clear as the total area planted under the grant scheme<br />

shows a rise over the same period.<br />

Publicity and public relations are obviously considered of great importance as evidenced by<br />

the expenditure on the John F. Kennedy Park ofmore than twice the combined total spent on<br />

forestry education and private forestry. The Park, an arboretum and forest garden with<br />

provision for public recreation, is a major development which attracted over 80,000 visitors<br />

during its first six months of operation. Three of the four illustrations are plates showing<br />

various aspects of the Park.<br />

J.E.G.


ANNUAL REPORTS 87<br />

on silviculture and $291,612 on research (excluding salaries of permanent staff).<br />

Despite 79,323 acres being opened for final felling, only 41,597 acres were given the<br />

first poison-gird'ling tre1atment after final felling, whilst the tacreage of exploited forests<br />

but not yet treated was recorded as 301,312 acres; this was largely due to the fears of<br />

their excision for agricultural purposes in the near future. Cleaning operations over<br />

17,804 acres of fivejten-year-old regeneration were carried out, and regenerated forests<br />

increased to 191,862 acres, of which 14,295 acres were treated during the year. Enrich­<br />

Inent planting was carried out over 1,040 acres, and 311 acres of plantations created.<br />

The report records rapid progress in some sections of the Forest Research Institute<br />

\vith particular emphasis being placed on afforestation and utilisation research and the<br />

conduct of the forest resources surveys; the former being largely due to the initiation<br />

of the UNDtp assisted proje1ct on 'pilot plantafion1s of quick-growing tree species. On<br />

the other hand the report also records that the silviculture branch of the Institute<br />

"went through an even leaner year," though on the brighter side it states that a silvicultural<br />

ecologist under the Colombo Plan is expected in 1968 to undertake silvicultural<br />

research in the hill forests.<br />

West Malaysia possesses as yet no clear-cut policy on which to base a sound and<br />

realistic research programme, although indications are fairly clear as to the direction<br />

the forest policy will take. Moreover, research data on which to have a regeneration<br />

programme on the basis of the probable policy of production forestry in the foot hills<br />

and hill forest are apparently limited. Yet exploitation of the natural forest resources,<br />

including exploitation of forest land outside forest reserves and presumably of the hill<br />

forest are continuing at an increasing rate. Recent working plans drawn up by a<br />

Colombo Plan expert at Federal Government's request have not been accepted by all<br />

of the State Governments.<br />

The report follows closely the past pattern of dealing with both Federal and State<br />

interests. It is hoped that future annual reports will appear before the information is<br />

so out of date, and tha:t there may by now be a more satisfa'ctory state of affairs to<br />

record concerning the future. Otlherwise the se'cond of the UNDP Spe'cial Fund<br />

assisted projects which is required to determine both the quantitative and qualitative<br />

potential resources of the nation and to prepare a master plan co-ordinating both<br />

governmental and non-governmental bodies in developing and improving the existing<br />

forest industries, and which it was hoped would come into operation during 1968, may<br />

find itself facing an uneviable, if not impossible, task.<br />

I.W-S.


COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Forest Environments in Tropical<br />

Life Zones<br />

A Pilot Study<br />

L. R. Holdridge, W. C. Grenke, N. H. Hatheway,<br />

T. Liang and J. A. Tosi, Jr.<br />

Presents in unprecedented detail and scope through multiemulsion<br />

airphoto coverage the floristics, structure, physiognomy,<br />

and soils of a wide variety of tropical forests.<br />

The Holdridge Classification of World Life Zones is<br />

selected for trial because it is relatively advanced, has been<br />

widely applied in the American tropics (in other contexts),<br />

and has demonstrated possibilities for necessary extension<br />

and refinement.<br />

Contents: Introduction; Background of the Study; The<br />

Field' Research; Climates of the Sites; Site Description and<br />

Data; Organization and Consolidation of Ground Observations;<br />

Analyses of Aerial Photography; The End of the<br />

Beginning; Appendix I: Site Floristics; Appendix 11: A Trial<br />

Application of the Basic Life Zone System in Southeast<br />

Asia; Appendix Ill: Mega Vegetation Symbolization.<br />

780 pages including full colour maps £30.00 hard cover<br />

The Principles of Forest Yield<br />

Study<br />

E. Assmann, Institut fur Forstliche Ertragskunde, University<br />

of Munich, Germany<br />

A summary of the present state of knowledge in the field<br />

of forest yield studies. The central core of this study appertains<br />

to the research into growing space and the concept of<br />

thinning is interpreted by the author on a new basis.<br />

Contents: Foreward; Introduction; Section A. Woody growth<br />

as part of the total produce of plant societies; Soil<br />

climate and plant cover; The assimilation process from<br />

the point of view of quantitative ecology; The organic<br />

production of forest stands and its components; Ser;tion B.<br />

Tree growth and form; Section C. The constitution and<br />

development of stands; Section D. Structure, increment and<br />

yield of stands in relation to silvicultural yield; Section E.<br />

Forest organization and yield; Appendix: Hohenadls method.<br />

528 pages £ I0.00 hard cover<br />

Pergamon<br />

IIII<br />

C244


CONTENTS<br />

Loyal MessageIand Reply<br />

His Grace The Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry<br />

Chairman's Foreword ...<br />

Editorial<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association-a 50-Year Retrospect<br />

Officers of the Association<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest Authorities and Institutions ...<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain<br />

India<br />

Pakistan<br />

Australia<br />

Canada<br />

New Zealand<br />

Northern Ireland<br />

Mrica<br />

Botswana<br />

Gambia<br />

Ghana<br />

Kenya<br />

Lesotho<br />

Malawi<br />

Nigeria<br />

Rhodesia<br />

Sierra Leone<br />

Tanzania<br />

Uganda<br />

Zambia<br />

Asia<br />

Ceylon<br />

Hong Kong<br />

West Malaysia<br />

Sabah<br />

Sarawak ...<br />

Island Territories<br />

The Bahamas<br />

British Solomon Islands Protectorate<br />

Cyprus<br />

Fiji<br />

Mauritius<br />

Seychelles<br />

West Indies<br />

British Honduras<br />

Dominica ...<br />

Grenada<br />

Guyana<br />

Jamaica<br />

St. Lucia<br />

Trinidad and Tobago<br />

Former <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Territories<br />

Palestine ...<br />

South Africa<br />

Sudan<br />

British Universities-Departments of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Oxford<br />

Aberdeen ...<br />

Bangor<br />

Edinburgh<br />

Cambridge<br />

Forest Products Research Laboratory, Princes Risborougb<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Advisers<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences<br />

Forty-Ninth Annual General Meeting<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Page<br />

89<br />

91<br />

92<br />

93<br />

94<br />

101<br />

104<br />

105<br />

108<br />

113<br />

115<br />

123<br />

130<br />

134<br />

136<br />

136<br />

136<br />

138<br />

139<br />

139<br />

141<br />

143<br />

144<br />

145<br />

147<br />

148<br />

150<br />

151<br />

151<br />

153<br />

155<br />

156<br />

156<br />

156<br />

157<br />

159<br />

159<br />

160<br />

161<br />

161<br />

162<br />

163<br />

164<br />

164<br />

166<br />

167<br />

168<br />

170<br />

172<br />

173<br />

175<br />

176<br />

178<br />

181<br />

183<br />

184<br />

188


Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth If<br />

The Association's Patron<br />

8ti


LOYAL MESSAGE<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association,<br />

18 Northumberland Avenue,<br />

LONDON, W.C.2.<br />

26th March, 1971.<br />

MADAM-With humble duty and pleasure I beg to inform Your Majesty that on 16th<br />

.November, 1971, the Com'monwealth Foreistry Association, of which I h·ave the honour<br />

to be President, will attain its Golden Jubi'lee.<br />

Founded by Royal Charter as the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Association in 1921 under the<br />

patronage of His Majesty King George the Fifflh, a patronage which still continues in<br />

the person of Your Majesty, the Assodiia'tion has provided a unique link for foresters<br />

and Forest Departments. As the yea1rs pass, and in spite of changing conditions, the<br />

Assooiation and its work are proving of increasing value to the practice of forestry<br />

whether in Britain or in tropical jungles.<br />

The ho'nour confe'rred on the Association by your g,racious patronage has been an<br />

immense satisfaction to our members, and in this our GOllden Jubi'lee Year it is my<br />

pI1ivilege on their be\half to express our loyal and best wishes, and our grateful thanks<br />

to Your M,ajesty for having been our Patron since your accession to the Throne.<br />

I have the honour to be, Madam,<br />

Your Majesty's most loyal and obedient subject,<br />

President.<br />

'fhe Duke of Buccleuch, K.T.,<br />

President,<br />

The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Associafion.<br />

Buckingham Palace.<br />

2nd April, 1971.<br />

I sincerely thank you and the members of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association<br />

for your kind and loyal message.<br />

As Patron of the Association, I congratulaJte you on the Jubilee which you are<br />

celebrating this year. I know what important and widespread work you are undertaking<br />

and send you my warmest good Wishes for the years ahead.<br />

ELIZABETH R.<br />

89


90 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

fJis Grac2 The Duke o.r Buccleuch and Queensberry.


HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH<br />

AND QUEENSBERRY, P.C., K.T., G.C.V.O.<br />

WALTER JOHN MONTAGU-DOUGLAS-SCOTT, 8th Duke of Buccleuch and 10th Duke of<br />

Queensberry, K.T., P.C., G.e.v.o., LL.D. (Hon.), took office as President of the<br />

Association in 1957.<br />

He was born on 30th December, 1894, and joined the Royal Scots just before<br />

the outbreak of war in 1914. He was almost immediately transferred to the<br />

Grenadier Guards and served with them in France throughout 1915 and 1916,<br />

commanding a company at the age of 20. He remained in France most of 1917<br />

and 1918.<br />

Since then there is scarcely a field of activity in which he has not played a<br />

prominent part and given freely of his time and energy. One' can mention only a<br />

few. He was A.D.C. to the Governor General 'of Canada in 1920; commanded the<br />

4th King's Own Scottish Borderers 1923 to 1929; he was a member of the House<br />

of Commons (as Earl of Dalkeith) from 1923-35, since when he has been an active<br />

member of the House of Lords, and became a Privy Councillor in 1937. He concerned<br />

himself too with Loca!l Government, particularly in Roxburghshire, where<br />

he spent much of his time, and was Chairman of the County Council for over 20<br />

years'l and has been Lord Lieutenant since 1932. He enjoys the freedom of the<br />

Burghs of Hawick and Selkirk.<br />

He has numerous appointments in the Royal gift. He was Lord Steward of the<br />

Household of King George VI, is Knight of the Thistle and Chancellor of the<br />

Order of the Thistle, allso Captain General of Her Majesty's Bodyguard in Scotland<br />

and Gold Stick for Scotland. He is also Lord Clerk Register for Scotland and<br />

Keeper of the Signet.<br />

He closely supervises the policy and management of large family estates in the<br />

south of Scotland and in Northamptonshire. At first his interest was mainly in<br />

farming, but later the woods claimed much more of his personal attention. During<br />

the war, in common with other woodland owners, many of his woods were felled<br />

to provide urgently needed timber.<br />

By 1939 he had become President of the Royal Scottish <strong>Forestry</strong> Society, and<br />

subsequently was much involved in negotiation with the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission and<br />

others in the evolution of the post-war forest policy, a prominent feature of which<br />

was the Dedication Scheme for woodland owners. He took opportunities to widen<br />

his knowledge and exp,erience in forestry by visits to many European countries and<br />

to Africa, where he has had frequent me'etings with numerous African political<br />

leaders. On the family properties he embarked on a very extended replanting<br />

programme, clearing and replanting poorly stocked woods and planting additional<br />

ground not suitable for farming.<br />

He has always welcomed interested visitors to his woods, and many <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

and other foresters have seen one or other of them. Older visitors will perhaps<br />

remember, for example, one of the earliest and best Sitka plantations in this<br />

country at Drumlanrig in Dumfriesshire, established long before the creation of<br />

the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, w'hich has planted so much Sitka Sp'ruce. This plantation<br />

!s now, alas, no longer in existence. In 'later years many will have seen his pioneer­<br />

Ing work in the afforestation of land left derelict by iron-stone 'workings in North..<br />

amptonshire, and much else of interest as well. All will agree that the general<br />

standard of his 18,000 acres of dedicated woodlands is an example and an inspiration<br />

not only to private owners, but to foresters in general.<br />

91


CHAIRMAN'S FOREWOR·D<br />

IT IS A PLEASURE and an honour to write a foreword to this the Jubilee number of the<br />

REVIEW.<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission supported the formation of the Association very actively<br />

in 1921. For example the first two Editors of the REVIEW were on the staff of the<br />

Commission, two of the first three Chairmen were prominent <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners.<br />

Throughout the 50 years the Commission has continued to help the Association in<br />

many ways. I am particularly happy that this is still continuing under the guidance<br />

of Dr. John A. Dickson, now Director General and Deputy Chairman of the Commission,<br />

and a member of the Governing Council and Executive Committee.<br />

There is however a need of a much wider co-operation throughout the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

and it is this I would like to emphasise. There are those, it must be admitted,<br />

who have felt that the changes in the structure of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-influences<br />

such as the consistent trend towards training Forest Officers in their home territory<br />

and the formation of local forestry associations have created conditions in which the<br />

Association was unnecessary or at least unlikely to flourish. It is true we have had<br />

some difficulties to contend with but I believe the worst are over and I think this attitude<br />

is completely wrong as has been demonstrated for example in Canada and Australia<br />

where we have many of our members. I cannot believe that the young forest officer<br />

of today, wherever he may have been trained, is likely to develop such a narrow<br />

approach to his subject as to exclude from his interest the work which is going on in<br />

other territories or to be unwilling to co-operate with other foresters or timber users<br />

wherever they may be, to further their common aims.<br />

It is in this field that the Association can do so much. The need is still there, in fact<br />

in many ways I think it is greater than it was 50 years ago; and speaking for the<br />

officers and the Executive Committee of the Association I can say the determination is<br />

there. I have faith that we can and shall achieve success. We know that we have wide<br />

support from the Timber Trade. I think too, that public opinion will support us on<br />

an increasing scale. The common cry today is for Conservation of Nature and Wild<br />

Life. Who has more knowledge of or a greater part to play in this than tIle Forester?<br />

A. H. GOSLING.<br />

92


COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Vol. 50 (2), No. 144, June 1971<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

We consider it an honour and a privilege to write this Golden Jubilee Editorial<br />

as the tenth holder of ,the p,ost of Editor. In this Jubilee issue of the <strong>Review</strong> an<br />

attempt is made to outline the' history of the Association and the history of all<br />

those organisations which have contributed to forest development in the Commo'nwealth<br />

during the fifty years. The opportunity is also: taken to pay tribute to' all<br />

those who as individuals or as members of the various organisations referred to<br />

have given the Assoc1iation their unstinting support both morally and actively over<br />

the years.<br />

The various histories have of necessity to be brief-it is realised that volumes<br />

could have been, and will be, written on these histories. What has been produced<br />

is a series of thumb-nail sketches giving as wide a coverage as possible and intended<br />

more as a recognition of their place in the development of <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forestry<br />

and of the Association than as comprehensive histories.<br />

Throughout its fifty years the Association has enjoyed the sup,port of British<br />

landowners, distinguished members of the academic world, eminent members of<br />

the profession and leading members of the timb'er trade. We feel it wo'uId be<br />

invidious to, s'ingle out individuals for particular mention other than where they<br />

are mentioned in the various historical notes. It is however co'nsidered appropriate<br />

that in this issue we should, in our series of prominent <strong>Commonwealth</strong> foresters,<br />

include our President for the past fourteen years, His Grace The' Duke of<br />

BuccIeuch and Queensberry.<br />

During its fifty years the Association has accomplished a great deal. There have<br />

been those who thought the disap,p,earance of "Empire" signalled its end; later<br />

there have been those who, thought its services were no, longer necessary as more<br />

and more territories gained indep,endence. Events have sho'wn that the need for<br />

the Association as a vital link in <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forestry is today greater than<br />

ever. The Association starts 'its second fifty years confident in the kno,wledge that<br />

it is an accepted feature of <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forestry.<br />

93


THE COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION<br />

A 50-year Retrospect<br />

By PROFESSOR M. V. LAURIE<br />

IN THIS, the Golden Jubilee Year of the Association, it is of interest to look back<br />

o,ver the last 50 years to the founding of the Association, to the aims and o,bjectives<br />

laid down at that time and to see how far they have been met and how far the<br />

activities of the Association have fulfille'd the hopes and dreams of our founders.<br />

The period just after the First World War was one of tremendous activity and<br />

enlivened interest in forestry. The war experience had highlighted the dangers of<br />

an inadequate forest policy in Britain and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission was founded<br />

in order to put our domestic house in order. At the same time, a critical look was<br />

directed to the forests of the then British Empire. Standards of forest management<br />

were very variable, ranging from fairly enlighte'ned in countries such as India<br />

which had had a forest service in being for a considerable time to almost nonexistent,<br />

as in many other tropical countries. The wanton destruction of p,otentially<br />

valuable and productive forests by shifting cutivation, over-grazing and over·<br />

exploitation was widespread and was causing serious concern to, foresters. The<br />

productive potential of forests throughout the Empire as it was then had hardly<br />

begun to be develope'd, except in India, where the priority task of saving the<br />

forests from destruction 'was giving away to considerations of management for<br />

increased timber production. Research to this end was in its infancy and was quite<br />

inadequate to meet the situatio'n, but mOire important still was the' ignorance of<br />

the governments, administrators and the general public alike of the basic principles<br />

of forestry, and the almost universal lack of forest policies and forest legislation in<br />

so many of the countries concerned.<br />

It was against this background that the first British Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference<br />

was held in Lo'ndon in 1920, and one of the many valuable resolutions passed was<br />

that a <strong>Forestry</strong> Society or Association should be set up with Empire-wide interests<br />

which should unde'rtake aggressive educatio,nal work and pro'paganda so that everyone,<br />

and especially Members of Parliament and the L,egislatures throughout the<br />

different countries could app'reciate the importance of wo,od as a raw material and<br />

the dep,endence of wood supplies on forest management and afforestatio,n, and<br />

further to drive into the public consciousness the imp,ortance of forest conservatio'n<br />

throughout the 'world. The Association w'ould form a link betw'een the various<br />

forestry bodies and would mainly work through them.<br />

The moving spirit be'hind this proposal was the late C. E. Lane Poole of Australia,<br />

who died last Novemb'er and, sadly, has not lived to take part in the Jubilee<br />

cele'brations of this Association.. In discussion with a group of some half dozen<br />

eminent foresters, he drew up and presented to the' 'Co,nference the prop,osal that:<br />

1. A British Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Society should be formed to promote public interest<br />

in forestry throughout the Empire.<br />

2. Membership should consist of organisations, firms and individuals interested<br />

in forestry or the commercial utilisation of timber and forest products. The olbjective<br />

was to rop'e in eve'ryone who had an interest in forestry either directly or<br />

indirectly and curiously enough, it was envisaged that technical foresters would<br />

form a relatively small part of the membership.<br />

The objectives suggeste'd were:<br />

1. To create an interest in and to circulate information regarding forestry<br />

amongst all classes.<br />

2. To bring about better public recognition of the identity of interest between<br />

continuous timber supplies and systematic forest manageme'nt and to spread in-<br />

94


100 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

graduate course for foresters from all parts of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. In this way<br />

the memory of Sir William Schlich, as well as the presence of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Association, is kept alive throughout the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. Prizes have been<br />

given to <strong>Forestry</strong> Schools, e.g., the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association S·hield<br />

recently given to the Forester Training School at Olmatonyi in Tanzania, which<br />

was made possible through the generosity of Sir Stewart Mallinson. Also·, at the<br />

new <strong>Forestry</strong> Departmen't of the Australian National University in Can'berra,<br />

there is a room panelled and furnished in English woods for which the Association<br />

organised the collectio·n of funds and the supply of timber. In another case, the<br />

Association was a:ble to arrange finance through the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Trust, to<br />

ena·ble five members in different <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries to attend the ninth<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference in New Delhi in 1968.<br />

There are many other ways in which the Associatio'n can be useful, but in nearly<br />

all cases it has to rely on outside finance to cover any expenditure.<br />

From this brief account it will be seen that the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association<br />

has been active in meeting the objectives laid down at the time of its formation<br />

and that its impact o·n <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong>, th'ough impossi'ble to, evaluate precisely,<br />

has clearly been considerable, while at the same time ,the cost has been very<br />

lo'w. No doubt, if it had had greater financial resources, its impact would have been<br />

greater but, in retrospect, the Association has no reason to be dissatisfied with its<br />

achievements over the last 50 years.<br />

The pattern of world forestry is changing. <strong>Forestry</strong> practice is broadening from<br />

a mainly technical administration of forests concerned primarily with the production<br />

of timber and wood products to a community-oriented land use management,<br />

and the socio·-eco·nomic asp'ects of forestry are becoming more important. At the<br />

same time, many Commo·nwealth countries have become self governing and independent,<br />

and while they have lost the expertise of their former expatriate officers,<br />

they have developed their own, often highly efficient, technical and administrative<br />

staff. But they are inevitably more is·olated from one another and the need for a<br />

-body like the '<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association with its stated objectives of<br />

creating a means of communicatio,n between the various parts of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

so as to maintain the highest de'nominator of professional standards, is<br />

greater than ever.


102 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

HONORARY TREASURERS<br />

The post of Honorary Treasurer has been held by the following members:-<br />

1921-30 Sir John Stirling Maxwell (See list of Chairmen).<br />

1931-32 Sir P. H. Clutterbuck (" ,,).<br />

1932-45 Sir A. Rodger, C.B.E., ex I.F.S. and <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioner United<br />

Kingdom.<br />

1946-58 W. C. Potter, Esq., O.B.E.-A member of Messrs. Wm. Mallinson & Sons.<br />

1958-65 D. H. Rosser, Esq.-A member of the Union Trading Corporation with<br />

connections in West Africa.<br />

1966- C. G. A. Latham, Esq.-Director, Messrs. James Latham Ltd.<br />

EDITOR-SECRETARIES<br />

The posts of Editor/Secretary were originally separate: they were amalgamated in<br />

1932 and have remained so ever since. The holders of the separate posts and later of<br />

the combined post have all been retired forest officers having either <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission,<br />

Indian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service or Colonial Forest Service backgrounds.<br />

With such experience they have been ideally suited to the task of maintaining<br />

contact with overseas members, forest authorities and research and educational<br />

institutions. Their broad background of knowledge of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> is obvious<br />

from the brief notes given below on the successive holders of the posts.<br />

1921-22<br />

1922-31<br />

1931-32<br />

1921-32<br />

1932-38<br />

1938-52<br />

1952-60<br />

1961-62<br />

1965-66<br />

1966-67<br />

1968-<br />

EDITOR<br />

S. M. Edwards, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />

Professor Fraser-Storey-Lecturer, University of Wales and Education<br />

Officer, U.K. <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />

W. A. Robertson, C.M.G., F.R.G.S.-Retired Conservator of Forests,<br />

Burma. (Later Director F.P.R.L. and Colonial <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser.)<br />

SECRETARY<br />

J. S. Corbett, O.B.E.-Ret. India Forest Service.<br />

EDITOR-SECRETARY<br />

C. E. Legat, C.B.E.-Ret. Chief Conservator, South Africa.<br />

H. R. Blandford, O.B.E.-Retired Chief Conservator, Burma. (Blandford<br />

held the post for 14 years including the difficult years of the Second<br />

World War. Like so many similar bodies the Association was not put in<br />

mothballs but continued to function as usual. Of all holders of the post<br />

the Association is most indebted to Blandford not only for keeping it<br />

active during the difficult war years but for bequeathing a really viable<br />

concern to his successors.)<br />

W. MacF. Robertson-Retired C.F.S. Nigeria, C.F. Sierra Leone and<br />

C.F. Tanganyika.<br />

P. C. Lancaster, O.B.E.-Retired C.F.S. Conservator and Director of<br />

Federal Forest Research, Nigeria.<br />

F. G. Browne-Retired C.F.S. Federated Malay States, Conservator of<br />

Forests, Sabah, Director, West Africa Timber Borer Research Unit.<br />

J. J. Lawrie-Retired C.F.S., Gold Coast (Ghana) and Somaliland.<br />

E. W. March-Retired C.F.S. Ceylon, Jamaica, Nigeria, Working Plans<br />

Adviser, Malaysia.


OFFICERS OF THE ASSOCIATION 103<br />

GOVERNING COUNCIL<br />

The policy making body of the Association is the Governing Council through the<br />

medium of its own elected Executive Committee.<br />

According to the original Charter the Governing Council consists ofelected members<br />

"not exceeding forty-five in number who shall represent such parts of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

and in such numbers as the Association in General Meeting shall from time to·<br />

time determine." A reference to the list of members of the Governing Council in this<br />

number will show the wide representation by territories and interests presently sitting<br />

on Council. Every effort is made to maintain an equal balance between overseas and<br />

home-based representation and to ensure that all aspects of the forestry profession<br />

are represented.<br />

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE<br />

As mentioned above "the Governing Council shall have power to appoint a standing<br />

executive Committee, consisting of such Members of their body not exceeding twelve<br />

in number as they think fit and may delegate to such Executive Committee all or any<br />

of their powers particularly including the power to elect Members of the Association".<br />

For the sake of convenience members of the Executive Committee are selected from<br />

home-based members of the Governing Council. Here again a reference to the list of<br />

members of the Executive Committee will show the wide coverage of professional<br />

interests; forestry in Great Britain and abroad, the Timber Trade, Education and<br />

Research.<br />

LOCAL HONORARY SECRETARIES<br />

In 1923 the Executive Committee recruited various members in the Dominions and<br />

Colonies to act as local correspondents, a term which was later changed to Local<br />

Honorary Secretaries. This system continues to this day.<br />

Local Honorary Secretaries are generally senior officers of the various Forest<br />

Authorities. Their main functions have been, and still are, the recruitment of new<br />

members and the collection of subscriptions. The success of the Association overseas<br />

has to a large measure depended on the unremitting zeal with which they have carried<br />

out their duties. The latest list of Local Honorary Secretaries appears in every copy<br />

of the REVIEW.<br />

PERSONALITIES<br />

No account of the officers of the Association would be complete without reference<br />

to two outstanding characters who in their different ways did so much for the Association-Miss<br />

O'Hara and Col. W. F. Chipp.<br />

Miss O'Hara was appointed lady assistant to the Secretary shortly after its formation<br />

in 1921. She remained in the post for the next 41 years and could be said, literally, to<br />

have devoted her life to the Association, it was with considerable reluctance that she<br />

finally retired in 1962 at the advanced age of 84. Miss O'Hara was not only a built-in<br />

card index on all matters affecting the Association; she also had a wonderful memory<br />

for names and faces and never forgot a visitor however long the lapse of time.<br />

Col. W. F. Chipp, of more recent memory, was the Association's librarian for a<br />

period of 21 years. He was accorded a full length biography in the December 1970<br />

issue of the REVIEW on the occasion of his passing.


COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY AUTHORITIES AND<br />

INSTITUTIONS<br />

IN THE FOLLOWING pages brief historical accounts have been prepared covering the<br />

development of various forest authorities within the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>, and where<br />

possible, those that were in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> during the life of the Association but<br />

are so no longer.<br />

Educational and Research Institutions have been included in the territorial accounts<br />

with the exception of the United Kingdom Universities and the Forest Products<br />

Research Laboratory, Princes Risborough, which have been accorded separate<br />

histories.<br />

The length of the various histories varies and is in no way intended to reflect the<br />

importance of the territory or institution. All contributors were given an acceptable<br />

size of contribution, some followed the request to the letter, others did their best,<br />

but in quite a few cases we had to use our editorial blue-pencil prerogative. Some<br />

contributions are by Departmental Heads, some have been prepared in collaboration<br />

and again some have been heavily edited. Rather than attempt to identify individual<br />

authors the Editorial Committee decided that a list of acknowledgements due to all<br />

who have in any way contributed to the compiling of these records should appear at<br />

the end of this number.<br />

The grouping of the various territories presented some difficulty. How this has<br />

been done may be seen at a glance at the table of contents. Here again the position in<br />

the list is in no way intended to reflect the seniority or importance of any territory or<br />

institution.<br />

We are fully aware of the shortcomings of this very brief historical record and can<br />

only hope that it may one day form the frame work of a much fuller and more comprehensive<br />

history of forest development in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. No one will dispute the<br />

urgent need for such a history to be compiled before too many of the older records<br />

are lost.<br />

104


A CONDENSED mSTORY OF THE INDIAN FOREST<br />

SERVICE TO 1947*<br />

DURING THE first half of the 19th century the management of Indian and Burmese<br />

forests under the East India Company was increasingly but tentatively organised<br />

regionally to conserve valuable timber, notably teak for the British Navy, and to<br />

reduce the destruction and even erosion evident in populated tracts. Control was<br />

organised by many types of men-administrators, police, public works, army and<br />

medical officers, botanists. However excellent were the works of individuals ignorance<br />

of forestry and consequent lack of a definite policy were bound to result in poor,<br />

uneven control of timber merchants, right holders and other users of forest produce.<br />

Eventually in 1856 the Governor-General, Lord Dalhousie, appointed a trained<br />

German forest officer, Dr. (later Sir) Dietrich Brandis, to the charge of the Burmese<br />

forests. In 1857 after the Mutiny and the demise of the East India Company, the<br />

British Government, through the Secretary of State for India, became directly respon- .<br />

sible for the rule and welfare of India. Reforms included a great expansion of public<br />

works, roads and railways. The great demand for wood, particularly sleepers and wood<br />

fuel for the railways, accelerated commercial exploitation and the continued destruction<br />

of forests by shifting cultivation, grazing and fire.<br />

It became clear and was accepted that a separate forest department was needed.<br />

Then Lord Elgin's Despatch of 1862, approved by Sir Charles Wood, the Secretary of<br />

State, outlined inter alia the principles essential to forest policy and management,<br />

namely<br />

(i) Personal interests were incompatible with public interests in the working of<br />

forests.<br />

(H) Government forests should be set apart in a strictly formal manner, be marked<br />

with boundaries and made unalienable preferably with rights extinguished on<br />

equitable terms.<br />

(iii) The forests would thereby be removed from the category of waste lands to<br />

become a special State Domain.<br />

Accordingly in 1863 Brandis was appointed Inspector General of Forests. Then, as<br />

proposed in the Despatch of 1862, the Indian Forest Act (VII of 1865) was passed. That<br />

Act was replaced by the greatly improved Act VII of 1878 which was replaced by Act<br />

XVI of 1927 with only small changes. The objects and effects of those Acts were not<br />

merely to incorporate provisions and penalties for offences against the forest (offences<br />

generally included in other legislation), but to outline the new forest policy and to<br />

force attention on and ensure respect for the new forest estate created under a clear<br />

legal procedure. The Acts also emphasised the authority of the forest personnel who<br />

were provided with some special powers to support their unpopular work distant from<br />

the Courts and centres of police.<br />

Establishment of the Service. The stage was set to establish the Imperial (later called<br />

Indian) Forest Service. In 1866 Brandis had appointed two German forest officers,<br />

Dr. (later Sir) William Schlich and B. Ribbentrop. In 1868 the Secretary of State made<br />

rules, effective from 1869, for the new service. It was to contain 57 officers, namely<br />

7 Conservators (in 4 classes), 14 Deputy Conservators (3 grades) and 36 Assistant<br />

Conservators (3 grades). Pay was by grade and class starting at Rs. 250 (nearly £20)<br />

a month rising to Rs. 1600 for a first class Conservator. Promotion to classes and<br />

grades was by merit. All the offices were open without distinction to Europeans and<br />

Indians. Appointments could only be made by the Secretary of State or Governor­<br />

General in Council. To incorporate selected officers already employed initial appoint-<br />

*Note. This article depends largely on the 4 vols. of Stebbing's The Forests of India. Geographical<br />

and political names are those used until 1947. For lack of space the author has had<br />

to ignore local differences in development and procedure (e.g. in Burma and Madras Presidency),<br />

many activities and problems (e.g. grazing and shifting cultivation outside Reserves) and to<br />

neglect outstanding work of many individuals (e.g. of Dr. Cleghorn).<br />

108


A CONDENSED HISTORY OF THE INDIAN FOREST SERVICE 109<br />

ments to the higher classes and grades were permitted. The Government ofIndia could<br />

transfer officers from one Province to another. The foundations ofan All-India service<br />

of officers were laid.<br />

New recruits were to be trained for 2 years at a school of forestry in France or<br />

Germany, there being no school in Britain. Accordingly 7 probationers, including<br />

F. R. Dasai, an Indian, were trained and appointed in 1869. By 188695 men had been<br />

so trained and appointed. From 1887 the men appointed were trained in England at<br />

Cooper's Hill opened in 1885 under Schlich on secondment from India. The school<br />

moved to Oxford in 1905 and from 1907 all appointments were Oxford men until 1913<br />

when Cambridge and, from 1915, Edinburgh also contributed. From 1928 men trained<br />

in India at the I.F.S. College, Dehra Dun (opened in 1926) were also appointed.<br />

The sanctioned strength was progressively increased as Provinces and forest charges<br />

were subdivided and work and research expanded until in 1923 it was 399 (43 Conservators<br />

and higher). The incremental pay based on length of service began at Rs. 375 a<br />

month. The numbers included promotions from the Provincial Forest Services (founded<br />

in 1891 and trained at Dehra Dun), promotions which from 1923 had to be 121 per<br />

cent of the directly recruited strength. By 1919 only 5 Indians had been directly<br />

appointed but from 1921, after the 1919 Reforms, 40 per cent of the vacancies were<br />

to be filled by Indians (for Burma 25 per cent by Burmans) if they had the requisite<br />

qualifications. Indianisation was rapid until the prospect of new reforms stopped all<br />

recruitment after 1932. In total there had been 580 men directly recruited since 1866.<br />

Achievements of the Service. For the first 30 years the primary work was to select,<br />

demarcate.after legal settlement and then map the forest domain. The boundaries<br />

were cleared, marked with numbered pillars, the lines traversed and their lengths and<br />

angles recorded and legally registered. By 1900 93,068 miles (out of 141,204 needed)<br />

had been artificially demarcated. To hasten map-making to Survey of India standards<br />

a Forest Survey Branch was formed in 1872. By 1890, when the Survey of India could<br />

fully take over, the Branch had surveyed 22,641 sq. miles of forests and the Survey<br />

of India 23,518 sq. miles, mainly at 4in. to 1 mile.<br />

All those and other works were accomplished on foot or horseback, by bullock<br />

cart or elephant, in mostly remote, hilly terrain without proper communications. Long<br />

periods of arduous physical work in camp for weeks or months at a time in tents or<br />

grass huts, exposed to weather and malaria (whose origin was unknown until 1880)<br />

resulted in heavy casualties. Of the 132 men directly recruited by 1890 33 (25 per cent)<br />

died in service. The men recruited to 1900 fared hardly better. One cantiot but salute<br />

those pioneers and their devotion to duty and understand the lasting spirit of service<br />

and esprit de corps that they inspired under the I.F.S. motto meliora speramus.<br />

Working Plans. A noted accomplishment was the use of published working plans.<br />

Their preliminary was Brandis's linear surveys and regulated yields in Burma. In 1884<br />

as Inspector General Schlich formed a Working Plans Branch under the Government<br />

of India to centralise the sanction and control of all plans. All plans had to prescribe<br />

the use of control forms sent annually to the Branch showing deviations from prescriptions<br />

for sanction. That principle of sanction and control by high authority both<br />

ofprescriptions and deviations (and therefore application)ofplans wasneverabandoned<br />

although by 1920 control had descended to Provincial governments as they developed<br />

their own working plan branches. Consequently the forests progressively reached a high<br />

degree of orderly, stable management.<br />

Early plans were simple and extensive but developed steadily in scope and intensity<br />

of silviculture and utilisation as growing stocks, knowledge, markets, communications<br />

and transport improved. By 1947 out of 111,526 sq. miles of demarcated forest 90 per<br />

cent were under plans.<br />

Exploitation. Except for increased departmental operations after 1920, mainly in<br />

Madras and the Andamans, the policy was to use timber merchants for felling, extractjng<br />

and marketing trees selected and marked by the department. Except in big forests,<br />

as in Burma, where the tonnage ofmarketable timber per acre was low, and in bamboo


110 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

forests (as in Orissa in 1927) to introduce their use for paper, inspired by Dehra Dun<br />

research, leases were progressively discouraged in favour of annual lump-sum sales of<br />

marked standing timber by auction or tender of comparatively small lots. The consequent<br />

encouragement of small, often local merchants and the steadily improving<br />

roads and markets resulted in good competition, better utilisation and higher revenues<br />

but required more supervision. Sales by royalty on outturn, which discourage good<br />

utilisation, were made only where costs of exploitation or profits were uncertain.<br />

Hand-sawing at stump and extraction by bullock carts and roads, by slides, ropeways,<br />

flumes and pack transport in the Himalayas and logs by elephant and water in Burma<br />

remained the basic means of exploitation. After 1920 the development of the motor<br />

car and lorry accelerated road improvement. Advances were in step with circumstance<br />

except, from 1920-30, the premature use of American mechanical methods before<br />

markets for less valuable species were assured although locally relatively small sawmills<br />

and tramways had success.<br />

Silviculture. In early days an impoverished growing stock demanded rest, fire<br />

protection, cyclic selective removal of mature, dead and unwanted trees, climber<br />

cutting and dependence on natural regeneration. Those slow, tedious, unspectacular<br />

methods were progressively very effective unless or until site conditions progressed<br />

to favour unduly less valuable and shrubby species.<br />

From about 1905, as crops and knowledge improved, uniform shelterwood methods<br />

were introduced for more gregarious species. Plantations of indigenous species,<br />

especially teak, often by taungya methods and mainly in damper sites, as in Bengal<br />

after 1920, were also made. Few exotics except eucalypts in Madras were used. Natural<br />

regeneration, coppice and the continued use of cyclic selective felling and culture<br />

remained the basis of an intensifying silviculture in which thinnings became a feature<br />

after 1925. By 1930 successful protection had produced serious problems wherever<br />

progression towards a climax discouraged the wanted species. But the wish to retain<br />

indigenous forest and fashion it with biotic controls and culture persisted. Much<br />

study and many trials resulted, thereby delaying perhaps unduly more expensive<br />

outlays on artificial planting of exotic and native species.<br />

Meanwhile great progress was made in the construction and use of yield, stand and<br />

volume tables, in research techniques and in improving cultural management.<br />

Learning and Education. A primary and continuous task was to learn the secrets of<br />

Indian silviculture and teach them and managerial practices to junior personnel. In<br />

1875 the Indian Forester was founded to record and exchange information on all<br />

aspects of forest life and work. The journal has, without official support, been published<br />

regularly ever since. In 1901 S. Eardley Wilmot initiated central research at<br />

Dehra Dun (see separate article) by appointing E. P. Stebbing as Entomologist.<br />

- In 1878 the Forest Ranger College was founded at Dehra Dun, supplemented by<br />

schools at Coimbatore in 1912 and at Pyinmana in 1910. Schools for foresters and<br />

forest guards were formed later by Provincial Governments at various times. In 1891<br />

a school for Provincial Service officers was established at Dehra Dun for officers<br />

junior to the 1.F.S. to train Indians unqualified, unwilling or unable to be trained for<br />

the I.F.S. in Europe. It closed when the I.F.S. College was founded at Dehra Dun in<br />

1926. The progress of Indian forestry has owed much to the pupils of those several<br />

schools.<br />

Major literature (apart from many departmental manuals and innumerable Dehra<br />

Dun research publications) included Indian Forest Trees (D. Brandis), A Manual of<br />

Indian Timbers (J. S. Gamble), Silviculture of Indian Trees, 3 vols. (R. S. Troup),<br />

The Forests ofIndia, 3 vols. by E. P. Stebbing and 1 vol. edited by Sir Harry Champion<br />

and F. C. Osmaston, several floras e.g. of Chota Nagpur (H. H. Haines), ofthe Punjab<br />

(R. N. Parker) and of Kumaun (A. E. Osmaston) and Forest Types of India (H. G.<br />

Champion).<br />

Conclusion. Serving, seconded and retired I.F.S. officers also influenced forestry<br />

outside Burma, Pakistan and India, e.g. in advice to or membership of the Colonial


A CONDENSED HISTORY OF THE INDIAN FOREST SERVICE 111<br />

and Home forest services and in providingsix professorsandseveral lecturers offorestry<br />

in Britain. Their real achievement was to enrich a dilapidated growing stock and build<br />

in an unexplored forest environment a stable forest estate, soundly developed and<br />

rnanaged for a great potential and to hand it over in 1947 to Burma, India and Pakistan<br />

complete with schools of forestry, research centres and a forest staff able and eager<br />

to continue the work.<br />

INDIAN FORESTRY SINCE INDEPENDENCE<br />

The state of India's forests at the time the country attained Independence was far<br />

from satisfactory. Reserved forests had perforce been overworked during the war. Prices<br />

vvere high and were tempting the owners of private and zamindari forests to cash in on<br />

what timber was saleable, particularly in view ofthe pending abolition ofthe zamindari<br />

system of land tenure. At the same time industrial development was accelerating and<br />

the needs of the wood-using industries for raw material were becoming far in excess of<br />

available supplies. There was ever greater pressure on forest land for agriculture to<br />

feed the rapidly increasing population, and much forest land was lost in this way just<br />

after Independence in 1947. Something had to be done urgently, to reverse these<br />

trends.<br />

Firstly a new Forest Policy was drawn up and promulgated in 1952. It replaced the<br />

Forest Policy of 1894 which, though it had served its purpose well in the past, was<br />

inadequate for the changed conditions. The main new features were a target of 331 per<br />

cent of the land to be under forest instead of the current 22 per cent which was tending<br />

to diminish. The distribution of the forest area was to be flexible being higher in some<br />

States anc1lower in others. Forests were to be classified according to the major functions<br />

for which they were to be managed. Production forests were to be managed not<br />

merely on a sustained yield but where possible on an increasing yield. (The average<br />

rate of production over the country as a whole was very Iow and the potentialities for<br />

increase tremendous.) There was to be an aggressive policy of replacing inferior tree<br />

growth with productive plantations, better regulation of grazing, conservation of wild<br />

life, the creation of "Treelands" around villages and many other activities.<br />

With the abolition of the Zamindaris and the disinheritance of the Rajahs, very<br />

large additional areas of forest land, mostly seriously degraded, were taken over by<br />

the State Governments. India is now in the almost unique position of having 96 per<br />

cent of the forest area under Government control. This has needed a great increase in<br />

forest staff at all levels to protect, administer and manage the additional area. The<br />

training of this extra staff has put a great load on the Colleges both for Rangers and<br />

for the higher officer grades.<br />

To implement the new Forest Policy a series of five-year Development Plans has<br />

been introduced under which, among other things, large plantation schemes have been<br />

carried out in the various States. The first of these Plans (1951-56) was a relatively<br />

modest effort, but as the organisation was built up, the later plans have produced ever<br />

increasing results, some of which are very impressive. A feature of many of the new<br />

plantation areas is the high proportion of fast-growing Eucalypts used, primarily a<br />

variety of E. tereticornis called the "Mysore hybrid". To give an idea of the scale of<br />

operations, in 1966 in Uttar Pradesh State alone, the annual area ofspecial plantations<br />

lnade was about 10,000 acres (4,000 hectares) and has no doubt increased considerably<br />

since. Normal taungya is used where practicable, but where cultivators cannot be<br />

found, Departmental taungya is done. There are many other activities under the fiveyear<br />

plans-pre-investment surveys of forest resources, extraction and exploitation<br />

schemes, anti-erosion measures, formation of wild-life conservation areas, national<br />

parks and even the establishment of zoos, to mention only a few.<br />

In all a very determined and impressive effort is being made to rehabilitate the<br />

forests of India.<br />

An incidental matter of some interest is that the Indian Forest Service, which<br />

disappeared as such after Independence, all its members being absorbed into the State


112 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Forest Services with their varying rates of pay and prospects, has very recently been<br />

resuscitated in a slightly different form. Men from all the States of high ability are<br />

selected for it, and get improved prospects and conditions of service.<br />

THE FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND COLLEGES, DEHRA DUN<br />

Soon after the formation of the Indian Forest Service in 1869, the need for properly<br />

trained technical supervisory staff became acute and, to meet this need, the Forest<br />

Ranger College was founded at Dehra Dun in 1878. It was, incidentally, the first<br />

forestry school in the British Empire. It was supplemented later by Ranger Schools at<br />

Pyinmana (Burma) in 1910 and Coimbatore (Madras) in 1912. In 1891, a school for<br />

Provincial Service Officers was added at Dehra Dun to give higher training up to<br />

Sub-Assistant Conservator level but this disappeared shortly after the Indian Forest<br />

College was formed in 1926 to take over the training of I.F.S. Officers who had, up<br />

till then, been educated in Europe and the U.K.<br />

The Forest Research Institute at Dehra Dun was established in 1906. Starting on a<br />

modest scale with six research branches it grew steadily and in 1929 moved to its<br />

present imposing buildings on a 450 hectare estate west of the town. More recently<br />

the Ranger College and the Indian Forest College have moved to new buildings on<br />

the same estate.<br />

The Research Institute and Colleges are under the jurisdiction of the President,<br />

who is assisted by four Directors each of whom looks after a number of Branches.<br />

They are: 1, Director of Forest Products Research (Branches: Seasoning, Timber<br />

Engineering, Timber Mechanics, Composite Wood, Cellulose and Paper, Chemistry<br />

of Forest Products); 2, Director of Biological Research (Branches: Minor Forest<br />

Products, Systematic Botany, Genetics, Entomology, Pathology, Wood Anatomy and<br />

Wood Preservation); 3, Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research (Branches: Silviculture, Logging,<br />

·Wood Working including Sawmilling and Finishing); 4, Director of Forest<br />

Education (Indian Forest College, Northern Ranger College, Southern Ranger<br />

College, Editorial Board and Statistical Branch). There is also a Publicity and Liaison<br />

Branch working direct to the President.<br />

There are Branch Research Stations at Bangalore in Mysore and at Coimbatore in<br />

Madras, and a new Research Centre at Jabalpur in Madhya Pradesh to tackle regional<br />

problems.<br />

The Research Organisation as a whole is equipped to tackle almost any problems<br />

likely to arise in the fields of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Wood Utilisation. Apart from the routine<br />

collection ofcomprehensive data on the strength, seasoning, peeling, durability, woodworking<br />

and pulping properties of hundreds of species, many of them have been<br />

tested for special purposes such as match-making, pencils, plywood, etc., and a<br />

number of industries have depended on these results. An important early discovery<br />

was that high class papers could be manufactured from bamboo which today forms<br />

70 per cent ofthe raw material used by the Indian Paper industry. Recently the Timber<br />

Engineering Branch has developed techniques for using unconventional timbers for<br />

building structures.<br />

In Silviculture, progress has been continuous. The Silviculturist has acted largely in<br />

liaison with State Silviculturists and is a centre for the collection and dissemination<br />

of information. Statistics of growth and yield are collected by him and processed<br />

in the Statistical Branch. Forest Genetics is a recent introduction and it may be some<br />

years before the effects of tree-breeding show up in the field.<br />

In the Education Directorate apart from running the I.F.S. and Ranger courses,<br />

some eight different technical courses are available and technical training facilities<br />

for apprentices from wood-using industries are provided.


114 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Genetics, Forest Economics, Range Management, Forest Botany, Soil and Wood<br />

Chemistry, Forest Entomology and Medicinal Plants. Its Forest College imparts<br />

education to Forest Officers of both wings and Forest Rangers of the Western wing.<br />

Transfer of Management of "guzara" Forests to the Forest Department<br />

Since 1950, the Government of the North West Frontier Province have transferred<br />

to the Forest Department the management of about 1800 square miles of forests<br />

owned by village communities.<br />

Irrigated Plantations<br />

About 70,000 acres of new irrigated forest plantations have been created since<br />

independence in the Punjab and Sind. This includes the compact and linear plantations<br />

in the ThaI, which greatly facilitated the reclamation of this desert area into canal<br />

irrigated colonies.<br />

Soil Conse"ation<br />

The Forest Department started Soil Conservation work in pre-partition India and<br />

in the Punjab a Soil Conservation Circle was organised in 1939. Since 1954 the scope<br />

of work was greatly increased with assistance from I.C.A. of V.S.A. Recently a<br />

Directorate of Soil Conservation has been constituted under the Agriculture Department<br />

to carry out this work because ofits increasing stress on agronomical practices.<br />

Introduction of Fast Growing Exotic Species<br />

The work of introduction of exotic tree species has a long history in this area.<br />

Since independence, the emphasis in the Western wing has been on the introduction<br />

ofEucalyptus and hybrid poplars. The work has so far been largely on an experimental<br />

scale. Large plantations with Eucalyptus species have recently been started.<br />

Development of the Concept of Range Management<br />

Since 1954 introduction of Range Management has been started in pilot project<br />

areas spread all over the Western wing. The Forest Departments of the Punjab,<br />

Sind and Baluchistan now administer about 12 million acres of rangelands.<br />

Arousing National Interest in Watershed Management<br />

With the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty with India in 1960, the prosperity<br />

of the Western wing has come to depend very greatly on the efficient functioning of<br />

the giant Mangla and Tarbela reservoirs. At the present rate ofsiltation these reservoirs<br />

are likely to get silted up in 40-80 years. Since 1960 the Forest Departments have<br />

started surveying the problem and laying out pilot projects to demonstrate correct<br />

land use practices for the watersheds. In 1968 the President of Pakistan inaugurated<br />

the First West Pakistan Watershed Management Conference held at the Pakistan<br />

Forest Institute, Peshawar.<br />

Tree Planting along the Canals and Roads<br />

During the past decade, the Forest Departments of the Western wing have been<br />

responsible for raising plantations along the roads and canals.<br />

Transfer of Management of Forests of the Former Princely States<br />

About 1,700 square miles of temperate coniferous forests in the former princely<br />

States of Dir, Swat and Chitral have recently been transferred to the North West<br />

Frontier Province Forest Department. The crucially important and difficult task of<br />

settlement ofrights and demarcation ofGovernment owned forests has still to be done.<br />

Wildlife Management and Outdoor Recreation<br />

The Forest Department in the Western wing has been made responsible for managing<br />

wildlife. The Pakistan Wildlife Enquiry Committee is deliberating on how best<br />

to ensure the conservation and development ofwildlife in Pakistan.


116 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

a committee of management. In this way the C'ommission' has become involved in<br />

recreational ski-ing areas. ' , ,<br />

In 1964 the Forests Act was amended to provide financial assistance by way of<br />

interest free loans for 12 years to land holders for the growing of softwoods.<br />

Queensland<br />

In 1906 a State Forests and National Parks Act provided for permanent forest<br />

reservations alienable only by Act of Parliament, and regulations in 1914 vested<br />

control in a Director of Forests. Amendments to the Act in 1924 constituted a<br />

Provisional <strong>Forestry</strong> Board, which was subseque'ntly abolished in 1932 and a<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Board created. In the same year, under the Prickly Pear Land and<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Administration Act 1932, the Land Administration Board was construed<br />

as the <strong>Forestry</strong> Board and the forest service became a Sub-Department of the<br />

Lands Department.<br />

This arrangement continued until 1957 when a short <strong>Forestry</strong> Act constituted<br />

the service as a separate Department under the control of a Director of Forests.<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> Act 1959 brought the legislation more into line with that of other<br />

States, with one exception, viz. that the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department is responsible for<br />

the management and protection of National Parks. At this time also the title of<br />

the chief officer was changed to Conservator of Forests.<br />

The following categories of reservation now obtain:<br />

(a) National Parks, and<br />

(b) State Forests<br />

alienable only by resolution of the Legislative Assembly.<br />

(c) Timber Reserves, alienable upon the recommendation of the Conservator of<br />

Forests by the Governor in Council.<br />

The activities of the Department are financed from annual appropriations by<br />

Parliament.<br />

Westem Australia<br />

The forests of Western Australia were administered by regulations under the<br />

Crown Land Act 1898 until 1918 when a comprehensive Forests Act created a<br />

Department of Forests, headed by a Conservator and responsible to the Minister<br />

for Forests. This situation, subject to amendment and consolidation of the Act in<br />

1954, obtains to the present day.<br />

The Conservator, who is recognised as a body corporate, is appointed for a term<br />

of seven years. He and all officers of the professional division of the Department<br />

must be professionally qualified. Internal training and examinations are established<br />

for officers of a general division.<br />

Two categories of land for forestry purposes exist; State forests, alienable only<br />

by resolution of both Houses of Parliament; and timber reserves, alienable by<br />

Order of the Governor in Council but subject to' the approval of the Conservator.<br />

The latter may, in addition, manage forests on catchment areas controlled by<br />

other authorities.<br />

South Australia<br />

South Australia was poorly endo,wed with native forests, and it is not surprising<br />

that conservation and afforestation measures commenced at an early date in the<br />

development of the State. A Forest Trees Act was passed in 1873 followed by a<br />

Forest Board Act in 1875. In 1882 an amending Act abolished the Board and a<br />

year later regulations under the Woods and Forests Act create'd a Department of<br />

Woods and Forests under the control of a Conservator. This situation continued<br />

until, the <strong>Forestry</strong> Act 1950..1956 which vested control in the Minister of Forests<br />

who delegates his administrative po'wers to the Conservator.


COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 117<br />

In addition, the Governor appoints a <strong>Forestry</strong> Board of which the Conservator<br />

of Forests is an ex-officio member. The Board makes recommendations to the<br />

Minister on forest reserves, sawmills and the sa1e of forest products.<br />

Forest reserves are dedicated under the Crown Lands Act 1929-1960 and<br />

alienated by proclamation. The operation of forest reserves by municipal and<br />

district councils is provide'd for by the Local Government (<strong>Forestry</strong> Reserves) Act<br />

1944, subject of course to the supervision of the Conservator.<br />

Tasmania<br />

An Act passed in 1885 provided for the appointment of a Conservator of Forests,<br />

but until 1920 administration was effected through the Lands Department.<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> Act 1920 created a <strong>Forestry</strong> Department but by amending legislation<br />

in 1946 the department became a <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission headed by a Chief<br />

CommIssioner and two Assistant Commissioners, a situation which has obtained<br />

up to the present time. The' Act was up-dated in 1954, 1957, 1959 and 1961.<br />

Categories of forest reservation are State Forests, alienable only by resolution<br />

of both Houses of Parliament; and Timber Reserves alienable by the Governor<br />

on the recommendation of the Secretary for Lands, but subject to a report from<br />

the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />

The establishment of industries producing newsprint, fine writing and printing<br />

papers, etc., followed the successful development of techniques to produce pulp<br />

and paper from eucalypts.<br />

COMMONWEALTH FOREST SERVICES<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau<br />

Originally established as the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau in 1925 and linked<br />

to a federal department which preceded the Department of the Interior, the Bureau<br />

was provided for by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau Act 1930 which created an Inspector­<br />

General of Forests, a <strong>Forestry</strong> Fund, and defined its powers and functions.<br />

In 1946 an amending Act changed the titles to <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau and<br />

Director-General respectively, as well as increasing the Bureau's functions to<br />

encompass matters which had become necessary through the operation of Timber<br />

(;ontrol during the second world war.<br />

Mr. C. E. Lane-Poole, formerly <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser, who pioneered<br />

the formation of the Bureau, became the first Inspector..General, and retired in<br />

1944. Mr. G. 1. Rodger, at that time Conservator in South Australia, was appointed<br />

Ilirector-General in 1946.<br />

One of the functions of the Bureau was to establish experimental stations, and<br />

the first of these was established at Mt. Burr in South Australia in 1938. Additional<br />

stations have been established over the years and the sixth will be completed in<br />

January 1971 in North Queensland.<br />

The role of the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau has been essentially a co-ordinating<br />

one in a federation of States with autonomous forest services and individual<br />

forestry Acts. In addition it has had responsibility for higher forestry education<br />

(the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School) advised by a Board, and for research both at<br />

headquarters in Canberra and in the co-operative research stations in the various<br />

States.<br />

A milestone in its history occurred in 1961 when Federal Cabinet decided to<br />

create a Forest Research Institute within the Bureau and to establish an AustraI'ian<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Council. The organisation of these two bodies did not come to fruition<br />

until 1964 at which time the Bureau was transferre'd to the Department of National<br />

Develop,ment, leaving the A.C.T. Forests with the Department of the Interior and<br />

foreshadowing the transfer of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> S'chool to the Australian<br />

National University.<br />

In 1961 the Federal Cabinet established the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> Council consist-


118 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

ing of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Ministers for National Development (Chairman),<br />

Interior and External Territories, together with the State Ministers responsible for<br />

forestry. It is supported by a Standing Committee comprising the Heads of State<br />

Forest Services; the Chief, Division of Forest Products, C.S.I.R.O.; representatives<br />

of Interior and External Territories; with the Director-General of the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

'and Timber Bureau as Chairman.<br />

The Council has responsibility for formulating forest policy and one of its first<br />

acts was to recommend an increased 1evel of softwood planting, to be financed by<br />

the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. This resulted in the Softwood <strong>Forestry</strong> Agreements Act 1967<br />

which provided for financial assistance for planting beyond a base rate by way of<br />

loans interest-free for a period of ten years. The objective was to increase the<br />

total planting to a rate of 75,000 acres per year.<br />

After a considerable period as Principal of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School Dr.<br />

M. R. Jacobs became Director-General of the Bureau in 1960 and continued in<br />

that position until his retirement in 1970.<br />

Australian Capital Tenitory<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> in the A.C.T. has been the responsibility of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Government<br />

through the Department of the Interior and its predecessors. Under the latest<br />

reorganisation responsibility is vested in the Forest Branch of the A.C.T. Lands<br />

Division of the Department of the Interior.<br />

Mr. G. J. R'odger was apppointed Chief Forester of the Federal Capital Commission<br />

in 1926 and implemented a programme of planting with a target of 20,000<br />

acres. Rodger was followed by M. R. Jacobs, both of whom were subsequently to<br />

become Director-General of the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau.<br />

The A.C.T. Forests Section was then heade'd by Mr. C. R. Cole from 1929-1958<br />

during which time utilisation of the forests commenced and continued to expand.<br />

In 1950 the Section became a Division of the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau, but<br />

when the Bureau was transferred to the Department of National Development in<br />

1964 it remained with the Department of the Interior and is now the Forests Branch<br />

of the A.C.T. Lands Division of the department. The Director is Mr. M. W.<br />

Edgerley.<br />

During the current year, with a total plantation area exceeding 30,000 acres,<br />

the Branch negotiated an integrated industry agreement with a consortium to cut<br />

50 million super feet annually for sawn timber, plywood and wood chips.<br />

Northem Tenitory<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau stationed an officer at Darwin from 1950­<br />

1958 to make a reconnaissance of the resources of the Northern Territory and<br />

activate a small forestry programme. In 1958 the Northern Territory Administration<br />

requested the Bureau to inaugurate a programme of research, and later an<br />

operational programme with one of its objects the appropriate employment of<br />

aboriginals. It was understood that after a suitable period the "state" type functions<br />

would be handed over to the Northern Territory Administration.<br />

Two prime aspects were followed, viz. the development of a technique for<br />

afforestation with cypress pine, and the introduction of exotics (both dicotyledons<br />

and pines) from tropical monsoon areas.<br />

The transfer of operational responsibilities from the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber<br />

Bureau to a newly-created <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch of the Northern Territory Administration<br />

took place on 1st July, 1967, leaving the research activities to form the nucleus<br />

of the Northern Regional Station.<br />

Tenitory of Papua/New Guinea<br />

The first forestry legislation for Papua was the Timber Ordinance (Consolidated)<br />

1909. Mr. C. E. Lane-Poole, as <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser, made a recon··


122 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Australian National University<br />

The dissatisfaction in academic circles with the somewhat loose arrangement<br />

between State Universities and the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School eventually led to<br />

the establishment of a Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> within the Faculty of Science,<br />

School of General Studies, Australian National University.<br />

Professor J. D. Ovington was appointed to the foundation chair of <strong>Forestry</strong> in<br />

1965 and the Department remained on the site of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School<br />

at Yarralumla until its permanent buildings were erected on the University campus.<br />

The new buildings were opened by H.R.H. the Duke of Edinburgh in 1968 and<br />

feature timbers donated by governments and industry throughout the British<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong>.<br />

The Department provides a four-year bachelor course (including honours) based<br />

on a semester system. Full facilities for post-graduate training at M.Sc. and Ph.D.<br />

levels are available and actively pursued. About 50 students take their basic degree<br />

each year 'including about 10 % from overseas countries.<br />

Active research programmes are conducted by the academic staff.


124 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

made in 1929, and most provinces have now completed several inventories of<br />

increas'ing intensity. Tree planting on the Prairies began as early as 1875, and now<br />

most provinces have planting programmes that are lof a size proportionate to their<br />

wo-odland activities. Slash disposal is o'ne of the earliest forms of silviculture<br />

practiced, but mainly, it must be admitted, for the purp-ose of re-ducing fire- hazard.<br />

The major silvicultural practice no-w is in site preparations for seeding or planting.<br />

The pulp and paper industry began in the late 1800's. There were: mills in most<br />

eastern provinces by the year 1900, with the first mill in B-ritish Columbia starting<br />

production in 1909. Production in Manitoba did not start until 1927, followed by<br />

Albert and Saskatchewan in 1957 and 1968.<br />

The British North America Act of 1867 was a major e:vent in the management<br />

of natural resources as well as in Canadian history. It gave their control to the<br />

provinces then existing 9 but the federal government retained control of the natural<br />

reso-urces in the pro,vinces of Manitoba, Saskatc'hewan and Alb-erta w'hen they<br />

were formed. It was not until 1930 that these provinces gained control of their<br />

forest resources. .<br />

The present Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service has evolved from the jo'ining in 1960<br />

of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch of the Department of Northern Affairs and National<br />

Resources and the Forest Biology Division of the Department of Agriculture to<br />

form the Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>. This became <strong>Forestry</strong> and Rural Development<br />

in 1966, and in 1968 the forestry elements joined the new Department of Fisheries<br />

and <strong>Forestry</strong> as the Fo'restry Branch, renamed the Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service<br />

in 1969.<br />

The old <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch began in 1899 with the appointment of a Chief<br />

Inspector of Forests. Its chief duties were to look after tree planting in the<br />

Prairie provinces and fire protection in the forest reserves of these provinces,<br />

along with the' Railway Belt in British Columbia. In 1905 the Branch began<br />

administering timber of lands outside the forest reserves, and for three years<br />

following 1908 it also administered the National Parks. The first major step toward<br />

a research role was the establishment of a forest products laboratory in 1913,<br />

with a second, along with the first forest experiment station, in 1918. A Division<br />

of Forest Research was 'organised in 1921. With transfer ,of their forest resources<br />

to the'Prairie provinces in 1930 the Branch role became almost solely forest<br />

research.<br />

The first federal entomologist was appointed in 1884 and routinely included<br />

forest insects in his annual report, but the real imp'etus to forest entomology<br />

occurred in 1909 with the appointment of a new Dominion Entomologist and<br />

an officer-in-charge of forest insect investigations in 1911. A Division of Forest<br />

Insects was formed in 1916, becolning an organisation with five regional<br />

laboratories by 1935. A Dominion Botanist was appointed in 1909, and sporadic<br />

forest disease investigations were made until in 1920 a forest pathologist was<br />

appointed. The forest entomology and forest pathology groups were formed into<br />

the Division of Forest Biology in 1951.<br />

The provincial forest services, too, usually began with one man appointed as a<br />

Crown Timber Agent, Clerk of <strong>Forestry</strong>, or similar title, in a Lands branch or<br />

section. Their duties often were somewhat vague and ap'pear to have depended<br />

on the,personality of the app-ointe-e'.<br />

In Newfoundland d,uring 1900-1934 a small staff administered the collection of<br />

revenue, forest fire protection and logging camp' inspection. This period coincided<br />

with the rise of the p-ulp' and paper industry. A <strong>Forestry</strong> Division was established<br />

in 1934 in the then Department of Natural Resources. It is now a considerably<br />

enlarge-d Division of <strong>Forestry</strong> in the Department of Mines, Agriculture and<br />

Resources.<br />

a-wing to the small extent of its forest land, Prince Edward Island has only a<br />

small forestry unit located in the Department of Agriculture-.


126 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

of Bachelor of Science in <strong>Forestry</strong>. An optio-n in forest engineering leads to the<br />

Bachelor of Science in Forest Engineering.<br />

Graduate degrees of Master of Science in <strong>Forestry</strong> and Master of <strong>Forestry</strong> are<br />

now offered. The first M.Sc.(F) was awarded in 1917. Until 1946 a postgraduate<br />

degree could be obtained by a candidate who had three to' five years forestry<br />

experience and submitted a thesis on a forestry subject. One year in residence- became<br />

a requirement in 1946, and now the time needed to qualify for the M.Sc.(F)<br />

averages about two years.<br />

To the end of 1969 the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> had awarded a total of 1,068<br />

bachelor degrees and 93 master degrees. Planning .is in hand for a Ph.D. in <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

-projected for 1971-72.<br />

THE FACULTY OF FORESTRY & GEODESY OF LAVAL<br />

THE FACULTY OF FORESTRY and Geodesy of Laval University maintains one of the<br />

country's oldest technical traditions, while it keeps abreast with the most advanced<br />

techniques of science: the Faculty's main purpose is to achieve the best teaching<br />

possible in all sciences dealing with land measurement and forest resources development.<br />

At the very b'eginning of our country, surveyors as well as 11ydrographers were<br />

at work to prepare maps and accurate surv'eys of property. In 1674, the Council of<br />

the Colony issued a regulation stating the p'rocedures to be followed concerning<br />

the surveys, and at the same time, the rules for wood scaling in public forests. The<br />

difficulties that faced the first explorers to- acquire a more precise knowledge of<br />

the new lands discovered have not decreased in recent years. Most of our country<br />

is only partly kno,wn today, and detailed surveys of the land are to be- completed.<br />

The continual app-earance of new scientific techniques in such broad and diversified<br />

fields, namely the use of earth satellites for accurate forest mapping, is a challenge<br />

to modern foresters and forest research scientists.<br />

The esta'bllishment of a school of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Laval results from long-standing<br />

consideration. The scho-ol was established in 1910, when it became obvious that<br />

the traditional rule-of-thumb methods used in logging our virgin forest stands<br />

needed to be improved and that it was evident that more intensive' forestry<br />

practices had to be applied in order to prote'ct and manage effectively our forest<br />

resources.<br />

The develop1ment of the school was at first rather slow and far from what was<br />

really needed. In 1919 the School of <strong>Forestry</strong> was merged with the School of Land<br />

Surveying, which had b,een established in 1907, to become the- Schooll of Land<br />

Surveying and <strong>Forestry</strong>. In 1927, the School was given more adequate premises.<br />

Then, in 1941, a more elaborate teaching programme was adopted, which led to the<br />

establishment of the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Geodesy.<br />

In 1966, the Laval University Council, after careful study, ap-proved a reorganisation<br />

of the structures of the Faculty aiming at training more co'mprehensively<br />

specialists in all fields of land develop'ment. Thus, three forestry departments,<br />

namely forest management and silviculture, forest ecology and soil science, and<br />

logging and wood science, were established within the Faculty. Two other departments<br />

are concerned with geodesy and cartograp-hy, and with p,hotogrammetry.<br />

Since 1910, more than 800 people received their baccalaureate in applied science<br />

(forestry) from this institution. The number of students in forestry at Laval is<br />

currently about 260, and in the recent years between 50 and 60 B.Sc.A. diplo-mas<br />

have been granted annually. Th-ere are at present abo-ut 60 students engaged in<br />

research activities leading to the M.Sc.F. or Ph.D. degrees. The staff in <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

comprises some 30 full-time professors and a number of part-time- lecturers<br />

specialised in various disciplines of the forest science.


CANADA 121<br />

LAVAL UNIVERSITY FOREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION<br />

THE LAVAL UNIVERSITY Forest Researc'h Foundation is an autonomous body,<br />

incorporated under the provisions of the Queb,ec Companies Act, which came into<br />

existence by letters-patent signed December 22, 1954. It operates in very close cooperation<br />

with Laval University. The Foundation's headquarters are located in the<br />

same building as the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Geodesy on the new University<br />

Campus known -as the Cite universitaire. The Foundatio·n owes its existence and<br />

continuity to the financial contributions made annually by the pulp and paper<br />

industries operating within the Province of Quebec and the Quebec Department<br />

of Lands and Forests. There are two classes of members: corporate members who<br />

supply the bulk of financial resources and private members (mostly forest engineers)<br />

paying annual dues.<br />

Administratio'n is in the hands of a bo-ard of 14 directors elected by members<br />

attending the annual meeting. The Dean of the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Geodesy is<br />

ex-officio mem'ber of the board. The Director of Research, appointed by the<br />

board, is a Faculty member who devotes most of his time to set up the programme<br />

of research, select the directors of projects,app·oint scientific and technical personnel<br />

and present an annual report. The financial assistance of the Foundation<br />

has enabled postgraduate students working on specific projects to obtain the degree<br />

of master or doctor.<br />

Research workers can take full advantage of the Faculty's fine laboratory facilities<br />

and modern' equipment in carrying research, fundamental or applied, in diversified<br />

asp'ects of forestry. The Beausejour Forest, owned by the Foundatio,n, and<br />

the large Montmorency Forest belonging to the University offer excellent opportunities<br />

for field work. Through the Foundation the Faculty was pro-vided with<br />

greenhouse, comp,uter and some special equipment.<br />

Two types of publications are issued by the Foundation: "Contribution," in<br />

which results of research are published, and "Bulletin" which deal with technical<br />

questions. B-oth app-ear irregularly; up to now 14 "Contribution" and 13 "Bulletin"<br />

have been distributed in 'Canada and, through exchange agreement, to over 700<br />

institutions throughout the world. All printed material received is deposited and<br />

classified at the Faculty library where it is available to teachers, postgraduate and<br />

pregraduate students.<br />

Research projects implying large tracts of forests have be'en or are actually carried<br />

o,n by the Foundation for the Quebec Department of Lands and Forests; the<br />

ensuing rep,orts are published by the Quebec Government.<br />

FOREST EDUCATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF<br />

BRITISH COLUMBIA<br />

THE Provincial Legislature of the Province ,of British Columbia passed a University<br />

,Act in 1908 authorising a Provincial University, but it was not until 1915 that the<br />

lJniversity of British Columbia began its educational programme. At that time<br />

provision was made for establishing a Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, 'but it was 1921<br />

before definite plans w'ere made to ,provide instructi'o'n in <strong>Forestry</strong>. In that year a<br />

Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> was organised in the Faculty of Applied Science and an<br />

Associate Professor was appointed to organise a course to be offered in the fall<br />

term. A second Faculty appointment was made in 1922 to help forward the plan...<br />

ni!ng and execution of a four year curriculum in Forest Engineering. The department<br />

status was continued until 1951 when the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> came into being.<br />

From 1922 to 1939 the only programme in <strong>Forestry</strong> was the Engineering<br />

curriculum offered in the Faculty of Applied Science leading to the degree of


128 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

B.A.Sc. in Forest Engineering. The curriculum was designed to give the student<br />

a sound engineering background with adde'd provision for training in forest<br />

management, timber cruising, log scaling, lumber grading and certain aspects<br />

regarded as sub-professional in nature, it did serve to meet the demands of that<br />

earlier time. Such specialised technical courses as log scaling, lum1ber grading and<br />

timber cruising were eliminated from the curriculum in 1939.<br />

In 1939 the Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> introduced a five year programme leading to<br />

the double degree of Bachelor of Arts (in Botany or Commerce) and Bachelor of<br />

Science in <strong>Forestry</strong>. The earlier B.A.Sc. degree in Forest Engineering was continued.<br />

In both cases an identical fifth year almost exclusively of <strong>Forestry</strong>, was<br />

added to the four years of the B.A. curriculum or the B.A.Sc. curriculum.<br />

In recognition of the fact that the single final year of <strong>Forestry</strong> in the five year<br />

double degree programme did not provide adequate technical training for a professional<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> course, a decision was reached in 1946 to discontinue that programme<br />

in favour of a four year course of study after a first year university level<br />

science leading t,o the single degre;e of Bachelor of Scie'nce in <strong>Forestry</strong>. At that time,<br />

three options were established in the B.S.F. programme: technical forestry, forest<br />

business administration, and chemical wood products.<br />

Subsequently, periodic changes were made in the option system beginning in<br />

1948 when chemical wood products was dropped and three new programmes<br />

were introduced-forest pathology, forest entomology and forest wildlife management.<br />

Further additions were made in 1953 with the introduction of the forest<br />

products and wood technology option and in 1960 a forest harvesting option. In<br />

1962 the technical forestry option was sub-divided into forest management and<br />

silvics.<br />

The curricululTI leading to the degre'e of B.A.Sc. in Forest Engine,ering was<br />

suspended as a programme in the Faculty of Applied Science in 1962 due to a lack<br />

of student interest and recognition of the need to increase <strong>Forestry</strong> content in the<br />

programme. The following year the harvesting option was strengthened by the<br />

inclusion of several courses in the Department of Civil Engineering curriculum and<br />

pertinent courses taught in the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>.<br />

A major review of the B.S.F. curriculum was undertaken in 1961 and became<br />

fully operative in all years in 1964. This curriculum strengthened the offerings in<br />

forest managem:ent, woo,d technology and forest products and in the fields of<br />

Botany, Forest Soils and Zoology. Further modifications of the curriculum and<br />

numerous additions to staff have been made since 1967 when the Faculty moved<br />

to a new building shared with the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Basic science<br />

offerings were strengthened, student contact hours were re,duced to a maximum<br />

of 25 hours p,er week and provision for a choice of ele'ctives was increased. The<br />

present staff consists ·of 24 full-time and three part-time profess-ors, one research<br />

associate, a director of researc'h forests and a supporting technical and clerical<br />

staff of approximately 15.<br />

The options in the und:ergraduate curriculum are now wood science, silvics,<br />

land management, wildlife, business administration and 'harvesting. The pres'ent<br />

curriculum is designed to p,rovide a str,ong well rounde,d professional education<br />

and at the same time provid'e the student through the choice of electives, an op,portunity<br />

to supplement his knowle,dge of allie'd sciences as a background for further<br />

specialise-d education. All options pr-ovide a basic knowledge ,of arts and sciences<br />

and their al"plication to forestry problems. Programmes can b'e plann'ed individually<br />

for students interested in the management ,of the forest environment, range lands,<br />

recreation and watersheds. C10urses stress change, evolution and diversity, the a'im<br />

of the programme being to produce flexible, effective and perceptive graduates<br />

capable of developing within society and of meeting the challenges posed by<br />

technological and socialogical inovations as they occur in the future.


CANADA 129<br />

SOPRON DMSION-FACULTY OF FORESTRY<br />

THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA<br />

IN September 1957, 154 students and 22 staff of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Faculty. University<br />

of Sopro,n, b-egan their classes at the University of British Columbia. Thus ended<br />

the first phase of a' drama that began with the Hungarian revolution of October<br />

23, 1956, reached a climax with the flight to Austria of the majority of the students<br />

and staff on November 4, 1956, and attained a second peak with their departure<br />

from Liverpool for Canada on New Year's Day, 1957.<br />

The migration of a large section of a University to a distant foreign land probably<br />

is unique in ·history. It c.ame about through the efforts of the Canadian<br />

Government and the co-opera1tion extended by the Powell River Company and this<br />

University. All those who helped to carry the migration through did so for<br />

humanitarian reasons.<br />

The curriculum of the Sopron Division was fairly typical of the professional<br />

forestry schools of Europe and compares favourably with that of North American<br />

schools. Entrance in Hungary was from the equivalent of Senior Matriculation.<br />

Th'e course required four years followed by final comprehensive examin·ations.<br />

Considerable emphasis was given to both engineering and biology as well as to<br />

professional .forestry courses.<br />

The first senior class of 28 students -of the Sopron Division gradu'ated in March<br />

1958. The oth'er classes graduated in subsequent years 'and the Sopron Division<br />

ceased to exist at the University in May 1961. Altogether 137 students graduated<br />

and they are taking their part in the ,development of Canad-a carrying with them<br />

the ex,perience and traditio-ns of their homeland in the service of their adopted<br />

country.<br />

4


NEW ZEALAND<br />

The New Zealand Forest Service<br />

THE NEW ZEALAND Forest Service was formed belatedly a little more than 50 years ago.<br />

Long before the establishment of the present department there had been attempts to<br />

set up forest administrations, but they were short lived owing to the opposition they<br />

aroused or to economic difficulties that lead to retrenchment in government services.<br />

At the time of its occupation by Europeans in the 19th century New Zealand<br />

was heavily forested, and the main effort ofsettlers was often directed to land clearance<br />

to make way for farms, large areas of forest being felled without extraction of produce<br />

and burnt. There quickly developed, too, an aggressive sawmilling industry to exploit<br />

for local use and for sale overseas the extensive resource of high-quality native timbers,<br />

especially the massive kauri (Agathis australis), for which there was a ready market in<br />

Australia.<br />

Against a background of settler preoccupation with land clearance and a plentiful<br />

(seemingly inexhaustible) supply of excellent, cheap timber it was difficult to develop<br />

control over the disposal or exploitation of forested land; nor was there much support<br />

for afforestation except in a few naturally treeless areas.<br />

By the time the Forest Service came into being there was urgent need for evaluation<br />

of remaining forest resources and of practicable means of ensuring supplies of wood<br />

in perpetuity. One of the earliest tasks set the Forest Service by its first Director of<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> (L. MacIntosh Ellis, a Canadian forestry graduate) was reconnaissance of<br />

the forested and mountain land as a preliminary to a timber resource inventory and<br />

an assessment of the condition of the vegetation in the upper catchments of important<br />

rivers. The results were used as a guide to where more State forest needed to be proclaimed<br />

to safeguard as much as possible of the commercial and protection forest.<br />

Early Reforms<br />

Among the main duties of the new department were administration of the disposal<br />

of cutting rights in State forests and continuation of a modest programme of planting.<br />

Reforms were introduced to formalise the traditionally loose arrangements for sale of<br />

timber from State forests. These had produced poor royalties and led to wasteful<br />

extraction and milling, legacies of which still remain in the form of cut-over areas<br />

that are difficult and expensive to reclaim.<br />

An estimate of forest resources made by the Forest Service in the early 1920s threw<br />

serious doubts on the adequacy of the native forests to meet future needs. By this time,<br />

too, there was a better realisation that the preferred timber species were extremely<br />

slow growing and exceedingly difficult to re-establish. It was prudent to assume that<br />

logging by the methods in force-and there was little hope of modifying theseended<br />

the forests' economic life.<br />

To avert a timber famine the Forest Service recommended increasing the total area<br />

of State plantations of exotic trees from 63,000 acres in 1925 to 300,000 acres by 1935.<br />

The Forest Service had, fortunately, developed organisation and techniques for greatly<br />

expanding planting, which was increased rapidly to reach 50,000 acres a year at the<br />

peak, 1929-31. Enthusiasm for planting was at one time so great that there were<br />

visions of planting 5 million acres of waste land over 25 years. However, by 1937 the<br />

total planted area (State and company) had reached almost 950,000 acres. After that<br />

planting fell away sharply until well after the World War 11.<br />

Fundamental Change in Forest Practice<br />

The large-scale planting of quick-growing exotic species (mainly Pinus radiata)<br />

initiated by the Forest Service, and enthusiastically pursued by afforestation companies,<br />

brought a fundamental change in forestry practice. It ushered in the first era<br />

of sustained-yield forests that would support industry permanently, in contrast to<br />

the "cut and get out" single harvest from the milling of native stands.<br />

As the plantation trees began to reach maturity it became apparent that the timber<br />

130


NORTHERN IRELAND 135<br />

There has been some conflict between creating employment and economic return,<br />

but the "Unemployment Relief Schemes" have been replaced by a Government "Rural<br />

Improvement Campaign" in which the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division is taking part and under this<br />

Scheme supervision at Forester level has been separated from supervision of regular<br />

squads and the conflict minimised.<br />

In 1922 there was only one Forest Officer and two Foresters in the Division. The<br />

number of Foresters had increased to 11 by the war and after a rapid rise during the<br />

1950s the numbers of Foresters and Forest Officers reached 121 and 24 respectively<br />

in 1964. Since then the numbers have dropped to 107 Foresters and 18 Forest Officers.<br />

The reductions are mostly due to reduced work especially on road construction and<br />

production and to greater emphasis on efficient working. It is of interest that the first<br />

Technical Head of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, until he retired in 1950, was a Scotsman, Mr.<br />

D. Stewart, who had joined the Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction<br />

in 1911 (just before the first State planting in Northern Ireland). He died only last year<br />

and so lived through the start of State planting in Northern Ireland to the virtual<br />

completion of the first 100,000 acres 60 years later.<br />

Since the first Forest Park in Northern Ireland was opened in 1955 there has been<br />

increasing use of the recreation facilities illustrated by the greater number of cars<br />

visiting Forest Parks and scenic drives each year.<br />

As mentioned already, a White Paper "<strong>Forestry</strong> in Northern Ireland" in which the<br />

Governn1ent's intentions for the future are set out is at present before Parliament.


AFRICA 137<br />

mercial export. Some 112,000 cu. ft classified as mahogany but likely to be a mixture<br />

of Khaya and Enta.ndrophragma spec'ies were exported.<br />

With poor communications and no implements of traction and elevation, logs<br />

had to be produced within man-po'wered hauling distance of the lo-wer reaches of a<br />

few rivers. The industry, however, continued to expand, reaching a pea-k in 1913<br />

of 3 million cu. ft. The First World War brought about a decline.<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> De'partment was formed in 1909, on the recommendations of H. N.<br />

Thompson, Co-nservator of Forests, Southern Nig.eria, who toured the country<br />

extensively in 1908. He suggested, amongst other things, the introduction of a<br />

Forest Policy, enactm'ent of Forest Legislation, protection of timber trees, intro·<br />

duction of property marks for tree-fellers, collection of botanical and working<br />

plan data and the formation of plantations.<br />

A Timber Protection Ordinance had been enacted in 1907, but the Forest Bill<br />

introduce-d in 1910 was frustrate-d by local sentiment and never became an<br />

Ordinance till 1927. 'Constituting Forest Reserves by Native Authority by-laws<br />

was also painfully slow. As' the De'partment was also closed fro-m 1915 to 1919, time<br />

was lost.<br />

Once antipathy to reservation was overcome, creation of Forest Reserves became<br />

the main task. Collec!tion of botanical data, exploratory studies into the Silviculture<br />

of indigenous trees, trials with exotics and ecological studies received attention.<br />

On the utilisation side, research into drying, shrinkage, working qualities and<br />

preservation was carried out and sawmilling and pitsawing encouraged.<br />

The opening of the Accra-Kumasi railway in 1924 fo'llowing that of Sekondi­<br />

Kumasi in 1923, and the introduction of motorised tractors spread the industry<br />

through the high forest zone but the depressed state of the market in the years<br />

between the two world wars kept exptorts below the 3 million cu. ft. mark. In<br />

some years it was difficult to reach t million cu. ft.<br />

With reservation proceeding more steadily, attention was turned to the survey<br />

of resources, the preparation of working plans and the natural rege,neration of local<br />

species.<br />

The Second World War interrupited this work and organisation of sup'plies to<br />

meet service requirements be-came the order of the day. Officers showed their versatility<br />

in supplying such diverse p'roducts as rubber, gums, kapok, canes, shingles,<br />

mats, wooden limbs and honey in addition to lumber and p'oles.<br />

The war also offered the opportunity of trying out cOtmmercially, species other<br />

than mahogany. The end of it brought about an unprecedented b,oom in the industry<br />

evident in both volume, value: and range of species. An interesting phenomenon<br />

was the rise -of Triplochiton scleroxylon from obscurity to fame. Thus whereas<br />

in the five years 1934-38 the average annual cut was 1.3 million cu. ft, by 1947 it<br />

was 6.2 million eu. ft and by 1957 43 million cu. ft. It has fluctuated between this<br />

and 60 million cu. ft since then.<br />

Interest in hardwood supplies was great and directed towards local manufacture.<br />

From a dozen sawmills pre-war the figure rose to, 60 with five plywood factories<br />

following. The scramble for concessions started then and has stayed with us till<br />

today.<br />

Silvicultural research was intensified and a metho,d of regenerating under a<br />

shelterwood with varying canop'y de-nsities successfully evolved. Several factors,<br />

including cost, have led to- the adoption today of more extensive refining treatment<br />

where the stocking of desired species is satisfactory and planting where it is not.<br />

Yields in forest reserves are regulated on the basis of available data o'n times<br />

of passage ,between girth classes. Further data suggest that a review is due. Outside<br />

forest reserves where farming is uncontrolled maximum utilisation is encouraged.<br />

Train'ing of technical officers is done locally at the <strong>Forestry</strong> School, Sunyani, and<br />

Forest Research is today undertaken by the Forests Institute of the Council for<br />

Scientific and Industrial Research based at Kumasi.


AFRICA 141<br />

Annual Expenditure: £800,000-56 per cent on protection/plantation forestry;<br />

32 per cent on forest industry and 12 per cent on wildlife.<br />

Annual Income: £366,000-Forest Industry £301,000; Other forest income<br />

£48,000; Wildlife £17,000.<br />

NIGERIA<br />

In the last years of the nineteenth century far-sighted Colonial administrators<br />

began to realise the dangers of uncontrolled exploitation of the forests for mahogany<br />

logs and wanton clearanc,e for farming. Real efforts to establish organised forestry<br />

began in 1887 but the birth of the Nigerian Forest Service only took place in 1903<br />

with the appointment of H. N. Thompson, C.M.G., ex-Indian Forest Service, as<br />

Conservator of Forests, Southern Nigeria Protectorate. He remained the dominant<br />

figure in West African <strong>Forestry</strong> for the next 26 years. In the light of subsequent<br />

developments in other territories it is interesting to note that the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department<br />

was also responsi'ble for Agriculture and it was not until 1910 that a separate<br />

Agricultural Departm'ent was established.<br />

During the first decade of Thompson's administration the chief duties of the new<br />

Department were the control of mahogany exploitation and of rubber collection<br />

from a variety of latex-producing plants, species which were later to prove invaluable<br />

in World War 11. With his India background Thompson was fully aware of<br />

the need to obtain security of tenure of areas within which to practise long-term<br />

forestry. This was an uphill struggle; opposition from villagers, politicians and<br />

often the administration itself seriously impeded this work.<br />

Following the administrative un1ion of Northern with Southern Nigeria in 1914<br />

the unified Nigeria Forest Service came into being the next year with the amalgamation<br />

under Thompson as Director of the relative forestry staffs, that of the North<br />

comprising only two officers on the roll of the Director of Agriculture. The title<br />

of the De'partmental Head was subsequently altered to Chief Conservator and<br />

remained this until, in accordance with major constitutional changes, the creation<br />

of the ephemeral Inspector-General of Forests (1950-54).<br />

One lasting and important tliadition established by Thompson was the use of<br />

botanical names. He early appreciated the impossibility of carrying out any<br />

silvicultural work using vernacular names which changed from village to village<br />

as the languages changed. To this day every officer from the most junior forest<br />

guard upwards is conversant with the botanical names of the majo,r tree species in<br />

his area. In 1909 Thomps'on imp,orted :the first teak seeds from Burma, a species<br />

now widely used in plantations.<br />

The real expansion of the Department started afte'r World War I with an influx<br />

of profession,ally trained e'xpatriate officers from British universities. Between the<br />

two wars the work of establishing forest reserves made appreciable progress despi!te<br />

eontinued oPP'ositi'on. The land tenure situation in Nigeria is unique in as far as it<br />

affects forest reservation. The reserves were mainly created on tribal lands and<br />

remained the property of the tribe or family who were designated "owners" and<br />

were, and still are, entitled to royalties from any produce removed.<br />

On the silvicultural side it was originally thought that the Nigerian rain forests<br />

would be self-perpetuating and could readily and economically be worked on a<br />

selection felling basis. On those principles co,ncessions were granted in the Benin<br />

area based on the simplest of Working Plans prescribing a hundred-year felling<br />

cycle with a minimum girth limit. It was ultimately realised that these were overmature<br />

forests with an absence of younger age classes. This simple selection<br />

system was then replaced by a version of TSS (Tropical Shelterwood System) based<br />

on Malayan practice. At the present time the general tendency throughout Nigeria<br />

is towards intensive silviculture or "compensatory" plantations.


142 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

In the 1930s forest administrative changes divided the country into three Regions,<br />

North, West and East, in each of w'hich forestry was administered by an Assistant<br />

Chief Conservator responsible to the Chief Conservator with headquarters in<br />

Ibadan. In 1950 with the creation of the post of Inspector-Gener;al of Forests<br />

these officers became designated Chief Conservators. In 1954 the three Regions<br />

were given autonomous status within the newly created Federation of Nigeria.<br />

The Cameroons have a separate histo'ry. In 1919 part of the former German<br />

colony of Kamerun was mandated to Nigeria fo'r administrative purposes, being<br />

first a part of the Southern Region and later of the Eastern Region. In 1960 as a<br />

result of a plebiscite the territory separated from Nigeria and joine'd the French<br />

Cameroons to become the independent state of Came-roon.<br />

In the 1950s many important changes came about. The timber industry, mainly<br />

an export trade in logs, had to all intents and purp·oses been confined to the<br />

Western Regio-n through Lagos, Sapele and other ports of the Niger delta. 1954<br />

saw the long-wished-for but unexpected developm'ent of a healthy export trade<br />

from Cross River forests through Calabar. Even more far-reaching was the training<br />

of Nigerian natio'nals Ito fill senior posts in an administration a-bout to ac'hieve its<br />

full independence from Colonial status. As early as 1925 some attempt had been<br />

made to provide training for the improvement of Forest Guards; but it was not<br />

until the 1940s that a prop-er <strong>Forestry</strong> School was originate·d in Ibadan for the<br />

purpose of producing a technical staff intermediate between the protective staff<br />

and the officers with a view to relieving these last from several time-absorbing<br />

tasks of a non-professio,nal nature. The best products of this sc'hool were now<br />

selected for special university training as qualified forest officers, and by 1952 the<br />

first Oxford trained Nigerians we're appointed as Assistant Conservators. In 1962<br />

the first Nigerian Chief Conservator was appointed. It may here be added that<br />

there has for so'me years been a Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> within the University of<br />

Ibadan, awarding its own degrees in this subject.<br />

With approaching indep-endence in 1954 the Nigerian Forest Department, at<br />

that time the biggest in the Colonial Service, was necessarily divided into four<br />

units; but at the same time the Federal Forest Research Institute at Ibadan was<br />

created and now operates throughout the country for the benefit of all the States.<br />

The more recent history of Nigeria with the sad incidence of the civil war is<br />

well known. In 1967 twelve States were created out of the four existing Regions<br />

(a Mid-West Region had been created in 1963), resulting in the formation of twelve<br />

State <strong>Forestry</strong> Services in addition to the Federal Department of Forest Research.<br />

On the 1st January, 1970, a new Fe-deral Departme-nt of <strong>Forestry</strong> was created<br />

together with a ne-w post of Director, the latter's duties being to advise the<br />

Federal Go,vernment on the co-ordination of all matters pertaining to- conservation,<br />

utilisation and renewal of the forest resources in Nigeria, in particular their<br />

economic feasibility.<br />

No account of forestry in Nigeria would be complete without some reference to<br />

Research. Recorded researc'h work began with the work of J. D. Kennedy at<br />

Sapoba and W. D. McGregor at Olokemejie during the period 1925-1933. A forest<br />

herbarium was established in 1942 incorporating the earlier collections of Kennedy<br />

and others; this has now become possibly the best collection in tropical Africa and<br />

is housed in a fine new air-conditioned building. A silviculturist was appointed to<br />

the staff of the Inspector-General of Forests in 1951. In 1954 with the abolition<br />

of the post of Inspector-General the Federal Department of Forest Research came<br />

into being simultaneo'usly with the three autonomous regional forestry services.<br />

The annual research programmes were app'roved by a Committee consisting of the<br />

Regional Chief Conservators with the Director of Forest Research as Chairman.<br />

Initially investigations were mainly silvicultural, but have since been expanded to<br />

include a substantial forest products research laboratory and work on tree physiology,<br />

ecology, pathology and forest soils.


AFRICA 145<br />

then worth £9,876. There was therefore ample room for expansion. This soon took<br />

place with the demand caused by the reduction of imports and military activity during<br />

the second world war. Pitsawing proved incapable of supplying the greatly expanded<br />

market and a <strong>Forestry</strong> Company of the Engineers came to Freetown when W. D.<br />

MacGregor was Conservator and set up a sawmill at No. 2 River in the Colony.<br />

A second mill was installed at Kasewe and a third at Kenema. Rapid expansion<br />

resulted till at the end of the war the No. 2 River and Kasewe mills were closed and<br />

luoved to Kenema where the nucleus of the army personnel remained to develop<br />

the Kenema Forest Industries. This large unit, controlled by the 1960 working plan,<br />

used over forty species, classifying them into furniture, construction and utility woods;<br />

it expanded the embryo furniture industry started at Kasewe in 1943 into a large-scale,<br />

high quality production unit for furniture and prefabricated houses and schools,<br />

still as part of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department. Soon after 1960 the fetters of departmental<br />

finance were eased by creating a Government Corporation with R. A. Price, C.B.E.,<br />

\vho had done so much to develop the Industries, as Managing Director.<br />

As a corporation "Kenema Forest Industries" installed a completely new Stenner<br />

sawmill, purchased up to date preservation and kiln drying equipment and built<br />

a fine showroom near Freetown. Price remained in charge till 1970, assisted by some<br />

of the men who joined during the war. This unit has probably achieved the most<br />

complete utilisation of tropical high forest to be found in Africa. Its success has been<br />

due to concentration on the local market, the marketing ofclassified groups of species<br />

and the inspired direction ofits General Manager and his predecessors. There was one<br />

private sawmill in production after the war and recently efforts have been made to<br />

develop small scale sawmilling at Kasewe.<br />

From the early beginnings silviculture developed along three lines; natural<br />

regeneration, enrichment planting and taungya plantations. Under natural regeneration<br />

the lack of high quality species in the original forest made it difficult to obtain a<br />

greater concentration ofvaluable species in the regeneration, consequently MacGregor<br />

instigated line planting in 1940 to enrich exploited areas at Kasewe and Kenema and<br />

in some Protected Forests. The main species used were Terminalia ivorensis, Nauclea<br />

diderrichii and Tarrietia utiliSe In secondary growth this was successful but at Kenema,<br />

in high forest, these light demanders and other more shade bearing species gave<br />

disappointing results under the natural forest canopy, although this had been considerably<br />

opened by removal of the merchantable timber and by poison girdling. By<br />

1963 the department was turning more to plantation forestry. .<br />

Taungya farming was employed wherever possible to create plantations of closely<br />

grown light demanders and Gmelina arborea became the favourite species. Unfortunately<br />

this tree tends to die on many of the sites used between the 15th and 18th years.<br />

'This has made it essential to develop a very heavy thinning regime in the early years<br />

in order to maintain rapid growth.<br />

Since Sierra Leone became independent in 1961, the Department has been absorbed<br />

into the Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources and .has taken over control,<br />

under J. S. Sawyerr, of rubber production on a commercial scale in the south-east<br />

of the country. Expansion of the area of forest reserves has slowed down and remains<br />

at about 800 square miles, of which about 300 square miles are productive high forest.<br />

There remains to be solved the regeneration of exploited forest at a rate equal to the<br />

rate of cutting. This is probably the greatest problem facing forestry in Sierra Leone.<br />

TANZANIA<br />

(Formerly Tanganyika)<br />

Originally colonised by the Germans and known as German East Africa the<br />

territory had a forestry history dating from 1897. A succession of German<br />

foresters established Reserves, made Working Plans, laid down plantations of<br />

local and exotic species and p,ublished a game ordinance. A full account of German<br />

forest activities could well fill a fair-sized book and is beyond the scope of this<br />

5


146 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

brief historical note. It is worth recording that those early efforts provided guidance<br />

and a springboard for later activities of British foresters.<br />

During the 1914-1918 war the territory was fought over backwards and forwards.<br />

General Von Helton, the German commander, eve·ntually surrendere'd in Northern<br />

Rhodesia. Tanganyika was devastated and in 1918 decimate'd by famine and<br />

influenza. The British Government imp10verishedby the war gave grants in aid for<br />

three years and then she had to fend for herself, once the favoure'd German colony<br />

no,w the cinderella of the Empire.<br />

In D-ecember 1920 D. K. S. Grant who had entered the territory with Kenya<br />

Forces and who had had exp'erience as a- Forest O-fficer in Kenya and a District<br />

Commissioner in Tanganyika, was appointed to the new Department, which was<br />

staffed early in 1921 with a Conservator, a Senior A.C.F. and 3 A.'C.F.'s, 5<br />

Europ,ean foresters, a Forest Surveyor and 100 Forest Guards. Legislation was<br />

based on the German until the publication of the 1921 O'rdinance with a Schedule<br />

of 231 Reserves with detailed boundaries based on the German settlements. The<br />

first emp1hasis, justifiable whe-n one considers the disparity of finance to personal<br />

emoluments, was in enumeration. A fault must be made of the lack of publicat!ion<br />

of these efforts. The Southern and the Northern slopes of Kilimanjaro-, Misoziro<br />

and the Shumi Maganba forests were enumerated in the twenties and thirties. Only<br />

a part of the latter received notice in an article by Jo'hn Pitt in the Journal of<br />

Ecology. Plantation work was begun in S,humi, Maganba, Moshi, Arusha, Dar es<br />

Salaam and Ruko'ba in these early years, the emphasis being on local species. Tons<br />

of mangrove embryos were also planted to spe'ed up the succession on new mud<br />

banks. These areas, Kilwa, the Rufiji Delta, Dar es Salaam and Tanga, provided<br />

tanning bark for export to the D.S.A. and Germany and ,building poles for the<br />

Persian Gulf, the dhows co,ming down o,n the NE and returning on the SE monsoon.<br />

Zanzibar had 10,000 extra sailors during a good season. In 1927 the Oar es Salaam<br />

division was extended to cover ,t'he whole Ce'ntral Railway, and the German Reserves<br />

of the Brachystegia forest were located. This was the beginning of increasing<br />

interest in this area leading to the enumeration of reserves o-ver thousands of miles<br />

with the chief 'object of controlling the yield of Pterocarpus angolensis, for a long<br />

time the most imp'ortant timber of the territo,ry. About this time there were 16<br />

nurseries and 3 sawmills in the territory and revenue justbalance,d expenditure.<br />

A land Develo,pme'nt Survey (5 Euro,peans and up to 150 plorters) spent over 6<br />

mo-nths in the Southern Highlands looking for White Settlement areas, Forest<br />

Reserves and watching African interests. Some reservation was o,btained from the<br />

area and fro,m the Northern Province, when the Survey moved there. The beginning<br />

of the thirties saw a w,orld-wide trade depression.<br />

Slump conditions lasted right up to the war, Grant retiring in 1938 when the<br />

Department was taken over by W. M. Robertson. A 10-year plan was being<br />

broached under Colonial Development and Welfare funds when the war broke<br />

out. On the same day Robertson handed o'ver the' Department to Wigg who in turn<br />

handed over to Markham. East Africa had three weak infantry brigades with no<br />

ancillary arms facing Italians alleged to have 200,000 troops and all arms including<br />

aircraft. The Department was completely deplete'd when hindsight says it should<br />

have been tre'bled. This should have been done as soon as the Abyssinian campaign<br />

was over.<br />

There is no space here to detail the beginning of the Ranger School and the<br />

great effort put into timber production during the war. Suffice it to say that we were<br />

lucky in Webb as a Utilisation Officer pione-ering the way to the outstanding<br />

Utilisation Unit organised by Hughes for investigating sawmilling, kiln and air<br />

seasoning, preservation, durability and stre'ngth tests, wood-working, plywoo:d,<br />

saw dootoring, etc. This has culminated in Buyers Commercial Timbers ,of Tanzania<br />

1967. The Conservator Robertson was succeeded,in 1951 b,y W. J. Eggeling from<br />

Uganda who later intvoduced Sangster from that service. The ,arrival of the new


AFRICA 14,7<br />

blood certainly did considerable good to the forestry of the Territory, particularly<br />

as they had not experienced the frustrations of the thirties and were on the crest<br />

of a wave of optimistic trading. Thousands ofsquare miles were added to the forest<br />

estate and very extensive enumeration made, particular by Groom who wrote up<br />

his account of Muninga (Pterocarpus angolensis) control, subseque'ntly embodied<br />

in a larger pamphlet. By 1952 the Department had exceeded expenditure since 1921<br />

by £450,000. Its 'highest revenue was in 1952-£209,000. In 1962-64 it was spending<br />

with the help of interest-free loans and CD & W grants over £500,000 on the 3-ye-ar<br />

plan. R. G. Sangster, C.B-.E., took over from Eggeling in 1954 and the first African<br />

Chief Conservator too,k over from him in 1965-G. J. Ki'leo. A new 5-year plan<br />

1964-68 was initiated. The last receive'd report, 1968, shows the forest estate at<br />

50,354 square miles. The plante'd area in 1965 was 46,000 acres. Everything points<br />

to a successful future for the Forest Department.<br />

UGANDA<br />

In 1899 the Botanical and Agricultural Department was cre:ated. The <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Department was set up on its o,wn in 1917.<br />

The first forestry work was the -exploration of the country's forest resources.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> legislation was enacted about 1900 an,d the first forest policy approved in<br />

1929. This was follo,wed by forest reservation in 1932. New reservation and<br />

excisions from reserves have been going on since then, though the bulk of the<br />

forest estate 'had be'en created by 1962. The size of the forest estate rose from<br />

1,412 sq. miles in 1932 to 6,230 sq. miles by 1970.<br />

Inventories and working plans were m'ade as early as 1904 and 1929 respectively.<br />

But more e'xtensive work was only po'ssible after the Second World War.<br />

In silviculture, the first efforts were directed towards the establishment ,of pole<br />

and fuel plantations and during the 1930s consider.able areas were planted. There<br />

are now 19,000 acres of these plantations. Artificial regeneration of timber was<br />

sltarted early using Mvule an'd Mahogany. Due to shortage of labo,ur and the<br />

depredations of wild animals and lof Mvule gall fiy, planting 'had to be abandoned.<br />

Enrichment planting was revived in the ,early 1960s. Planting' was at first done in<br />

gaps; later on, weed trees were being removed for woodfuel and charcoal followe'd<br />

by enrichment planting. This practice continues.<br />

Natural rege'neration techniques were started in 1950 and by 1954 a technique<br />

of tending mixe'd fo'rest ha'd been developed. This remains standard practice in<br />

forests where weed trees have nfo market.<br />

Softwood timber planting started in 1942 and by 1961 a total of 6,500 acres had<br />

be,en established, all cypress and pines. In 1970, plantations amounted to approx.<br />

20,000 acres and planting has be'en increased to 5,000 acres annu'ally.<br />

Commercial exploitatio'n of timber beg'an in 1908. Felling in 1923 amounted to<br />

140,000 cu. ft rising to 3t million cu. ft in 1960/61 and to 5.5 million cu. ft in<br />

1970. A notable feature of the post-war years has been the increased number of<br />

species 'harvested.<br />

Sawmilling which was started by Government in 1911 ,passed later entirely into<br />

private 'hands. A plywoo'd mill was established in 1959 and there are now also a<br />

match factory, a particle board plant, paper and paper conversion plants and<br />

a charcoal industry.<br />

Silvicultural research began with methods of ,planting and espacement of<br />

eucalyptus species. In 1933 the first research plots were laid out and in 1935<br />

experiments on natural regeneration meth,od;s were started. Since the early 1950s<br />

research has concentrated mainly on the establishment of plantations, enrichment<br />

planting and regenerati,o,n techniques in natural forests.<br />

Wood products research at first concentrated on collection and dispatch of<br />

timber for testing in ·other countries. In 1949/50 facilities were installed to, test<br />


AFRICA 149<br />

annually to Mulo'bezi sawmill, situated at the end 6f what may be the longest<br />

forest tramway in Africa, running for approximately 104 bone-breaking miles<br />

upco,untry from Livingstone.<br />

The Department's other large-scale activity has been the supply of about two<br />

million cu. ft ·of indigenous timber annually to the mines of the Copperbelt, to<br />

which was a'dded during eight years of coal shortag'e from 1948 to 1955 the supply<br />

of 2,000 tons of wo'od-fuel a day for the mine power-stations.<br />

The lack lof any local softwood capable of replacing imported Oregon and the<br />

progressive cutting out of "Miombo" woodland accessible to, the mines and towns<br />

pro,mpted a keen interest in the establishment of plantations. Although research<br />

had been started in the 1930s, it was not until ab,out 1960 that the Forest Research<br />

Ce'ntre, whic'h had be'en establishe'd at Kitwe in 1954, succeeded in developing<br />

techniques for the establishment of tropical pines and eucalypts, which were equal<br />

to the harsh climatic and soil conditions of the Zambian plateau. It was then that<br />

Pinus kesiya, replacing the less robust Pinus patula, teamed up with Eucalyptus<br />

grandis as the front-runners.<br />

Altho,ugh plantation research was still in its infancy, national strategy required<br />

that industrial-scale plantations sh,ould go' ahead near the Gop,perbelt, and in 1963<br />

the Department's Industrial} Plantations Division began the first large-scale plantjngs<br />

for a 100,OOO-acre plantation project. This project, to, the Department's mild<br />

surprise in view of the silvicultural and utilisation risks that had been accepte'd<br />

natio,naIly, won the first World Bank forestry l'oan.<br />

Meanw'hile in many rural areas smaller-scale research and pilot plantings 'had<br />

been made against p,ossible future demand lo,cally for Eucalypt poles and softwood<br />

timber, and some of (these ,plantings :had in the more intensively farmed areas<br />

developed into local supp,ly plantations.<br />

The Fo'rest Products Centre at Kitwe, which came into being in 1963, expanded<br />

with breathtaking speed to deal with a range of utilisation research work on<br />

tropical pines and e,ucalypts.<br />

The Forest Training Centre at Mwekera near Kitwe', later the Forest College',<br />

opene'd its gates in 1949, and has provided pre-appointment and in-service c'ourses'<br />

for Foresters, Forest Rangers and Forest Guards, ,but the pattern of pre-indep'e:ndence<br />

e,ducation had resulte,d in very small numbers of school-leavers with university<br />

entrance qualIfications, and the Department faced the 1970s with onlly two<br />

Zam'bian P,orest Officers in post.<br />

Not the least e'xciting and satisfying of the: Dep,artment"s activities is the Beekeeping<br />

Division, established at Mwekera in 1959, which provides an extension<br />

service to help bark-h'ive beekeepers prodruct beeswax for export and !honey for<br />

local beer-brewing.


SOUTH-EAST ASIA<br />

CEYLON<br />

The evolution of forestry in Ceylon from the period of the British occupation<br />

up to the present time can be broadly divided into three phases where the emphasis<br />

has successively been on Forest Exploitation, Forest Conservation and Forest<br />

Development.<br />

Forest Exploitation<br />

From 1796 (which year marked the beginning 'of British rule in Ceylon) until<br />

nearly a century later, forestry consisted mainly of the exploitation of natural<br />

forests for domestic requirements and for export. By mid-nineteenth century<br />

Ebony (Diospyros ebenum), Satinwo,od (Chloroxylon swietenia) and Halmilla<br />

(Berrya cordijolia) were well known cabinet woods on the European market.<br />

Forest Officers (designated Foresters) were first appointed in 1873 and served<br />

under the Government Agents of the Provinces. The main function of the Foresters<br />

was to supervise and control the felling of trees in the state forests.* Small isolated<br />

plantations of Teak were raised in a few places, but this was more through the<br />

interest of individual foresters than as a matter of general policy.<br />

Forest Conservation<br />

The idea of conservation gained ground in the eighteen-eighties leading to the<br />

establishment of a Forest Department under a professionally trained officer from<br />

the Indian Forest 'Service in 1887. With the setting up ,of a Forest Department,<br />

Reserves and Proposed Reserves were esta·blished and attention paid to their<br />

proper demarcation and protection. The activities of the Department were finally<br />

placed on a firm legal foolting with the Forest Ordinance of 1907.<br />

As in the earlier period forest plantations were raised, but the extents planted<br />

were insignificant until the nineteen-twenties when there was a temporary surge of<br />

planting activity. Some fine plantations of Teak in the Dry Zone; Eucalypts,<br />

Pines and Cypress in the Montane Zone; and Jak (Artocarpus integra) and Mahogany<br />

in the Intermediate Zone are still stand:ing today.<br />

The temporary phase 'of increase,d reforestation activity in the nineteen-twenties<br />

and thirties was also marked by the establishment of the Silvicultural Research<br />

Unit in the De'partment. Ten years later, the Timber Utilisation Research Laboratory<br />

was established to· study the durability and the physical and mechanical<br />

properties of local timber and to collect timber samples and herbarium material.<br />

Forest Development<br />

The late nineteen fifties marked the beginning of a period of rapid agricultural<br />

expansion in the Dry Zone involving the clearing of large tracts of forest, much of<br />

it former Reserves. The urgency of extensive plantation development to offset this<br />

loss was apparent. As a result an impressive annual target of 16,000 acres of new<br />

plantations has been fix·ed.<br />

Teak is by far the most extensively planted species. Up to 1958 the total extent<br />

of Teak plantations was about 12,000 acres, while in the period 1958-1969 no less<br />

than 60,000 acres were added to this.<br />

The annual planting programme of 16,000 acres is made up as follows: Teak<br />

10,000 acres; Eucalypts (for pulp and timber) 1,500 acres; Pines (pulp) 1,500 acres;<br />

Light Hardwoods 500 acres; Bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus for pulp) 500 acres<br />

and Mahogany (enrichment planting in the Wet Zone) 2,000 acres. All Teak<br />

planting is done at a comparatively low 'cost to Government on a modified taungya<br />

system.<br />

* Over 95 per' cent of the forests in Ceylon are state-owned.<br />

150


SOUTH-EAST ASIA .15.1<br />

The natural forests of the Wet Zone will continue to 'be worked by selective<br />

felling on a sustained yield basis to supply light hardwoods for panel products,<br />

and hardwoods for building construction and railway sleepers.<br />

HONG KONG<br />

The Colony was founded as a small trading post in 1842 on a compatatively<br />

treeless island of 29 square miles in area. Soon forest and amenity trees were being<br />

planted and the vegetation protected against woodcutting and against fire during<br />

the dry winter months. A Botanical and <strong>Forestry</strong> Department was founded in 1880<br />

and the thriving plantations were systematically managed.<br />

The 365-square mile New Territories was leased in 1898 but before this the<br />

villagers had considerable areas of forest on which they depended for fuel and<br />

small timber. Government amenity planting and afforestation work in the New<br />

Territories started in 1900.<br />

During the Pacific conflict and just after, 1941-46, woodland destruction was<br />

great, causing fuel shortages and soil erosion. Re-afforestation produced about<br />

12,000 acres of plantations, in spite of difficult topograp'hical, soil and fire problems.<br />

The pop'ulation increased to over 2 millions in 1950, 3 millions in 1960 and 4<br />

millions in 1970. Forme'r villages became large to,wns, waterworks catchments<br />

gradually embraced most upland areas and with a more sop'histicated economy the<br />

need for wood fuel disappeared almost completely.<br />

Today the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division is concerned mainly with landscape conservation<br />

and recreation management. In 1970 its staff comprised three professional and<br />

eighteen technical officers, and a workforce of 400.<br />

MALAYSIA<br />

The creation of a Forest Department was first recommended in 1879. Four<br />

years later, the first Forest Department was formed under the then Superintendent<br />

of the Botanic Gardens, Singapore. However, scientific forestry in Malaya really<br />

began in 1901 with the appointment of a professional forest officer from Burma,<br />

as the Chief Forest Officer, Straits Settlements and Federated Malay States. In<br />

1915 the department was greatly expanded, but for some years afterwards organised<br />

forestry activities under trained officers extended only to the Straits Settlements<br />

and the Federated Malay States. As appreciation of the value of forest conservation<br />

spread, the protected States of !Johore (1920) and Kedah (1923) created forest<br />

departments of their own. Their example was followed by Kelantan and Brunei<br />

(Borneo) in 1933. A trained officer took charge of the forest department of the<br />

Government of Trengg,anu from the lbeginning of 1936.<br />

On the 1st January, 1935, when the policy of decentralisation in the Federated<br />

Malay States was inaugurated, each of these IStates also had its own forest<br />

department. The Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>, ihowever, by virtue of his appointment as<br />

State Forest Officer to each State, continued to exercise personal executive<br />

authority over, and was responsible for, State forest departments. In his advisory<br />

capacity and on invitation of their Governments, he also made periodical visits of<br />

inspection to the Malay States outside the Federation. This form of administration<br />

remained in force up to the time of Japanese aggression in 1941.<br />

On the liberation of this country in the latter part of 1945, a skeleton department<br />

was set up under the Britis1h Military Administration and, as more staff became<br />

available, the pre-war organisation was gradually re-established, but with more<br />

clearly defined central administration and executive authority. At this stage the<br />

Colony of Singapore was separated from the main body with independent administrative<br />

and executive authority. On resumption of Civil Government on 1st April,<br />

1946, and with the introduQtion of the Malayan Union, the trend of forest<br />

administration continued towards unity of authority and this undoubtedly contri-


SOUTH-EAST ASIA IS3<br />

consisted of a Chief Research Officer (who also- officiated as Timtber Research<br />

Officer), Silviculturist, 'Botanist and Ecologist, Mensuration Officer, Instructor,<br />

Forest School, General Assistant, Entomologist, Wood Technologist, Librarian­<br />

Archivist and a Chemist. In 1952 the Timber Research Laboratory located at<br />

Sentul was move'd to Kep'o!ng and it became one with the Forest Research Institute<br />

geographically and administratively.<br />

A review of the progress of research at this stage will reveal that the herbarium<br />

contained 53,629 mounted specimens, ab'out 3,000 Malayan wood species 'were<br />

kno,wn, an arboretum containing 400 trees of Malaysian Dipterocarps established,<br />

studies on rehabilitation of degraded soils initiated and the Malayan Unifonn<br />

System of silvicultural treatment 'of the forests evolved. Forest products research<br />

also had shown impressive progress in the fields of timber mechanics, sawmilling<br />

and wood-working, wood seasoning, wood preservation, composite wood, wood<br />

anatomy and pulp and pap,er investigations. Entomological research had also kept<br />

pace with the rest. Five-y.ear research programmes had be'en initiated and the<br />

research pamphlets series started appearing in 1953.<br />

On 31st August, 1957,-the Federation of Malaya attained independence and a<br />

target date for Malayanisation of the Research Branch was set as 1965. The senior<br />

research establishment at this stage (1957) stood at ten including the Chief Research<br />

Officer. In 1962 a Forest Resources Reconnaissance Survey Section was established.<br />

1963 saw the departure of the last expatriate Chief Research Officer, who was<br />

succeeded by a Malayan officer. As scheduled, the Research Branch was completely<br />

Malayanised by 1965 which year also saw the completion and occupation<br />

of a new additional wing to the main Forest Research Institute building, a new<br />

Forest School 'building and a ne:w Chemistry Laboratory, all approved under the<br />

S,econd Malaya Development Plan. A new library building was also constructed<br />

in 1968 under the First Malaysia Development Plan. A major research project,<br />

HThe Establishment of Pilot Plantations of Quick Growing Species," was launched<br />

under the Five Year Plan, aided by the United Nations Development Programme<br />

Special Fund in 1967 with the object of growing trees to meet the needs of raw<br />

material for pulp and paper manufacutre in Malaya.<br />

With the present establishment of 24 senior officers, two foreign experts and a<br />

British volunteer, the Institute is forging ahead with its enhanced activities to meet<br />

the developmental needs of the country.<br />

SABAH<br />

(formerly North Borneo)<br />

On 16th September, 1963, Sabah became independent as a State of Malaysia.<br />

'[he Forest Department remains a State Department under the general direction<br />

of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the State Government<br />

Sabah is a large exporter of hardwood timber to, world markets, and a timber<br />

industry which is continuously expanding is full of future potentials as a major<br />

revenue earner; it is thus the mainstay of the country's eco,nomy. The timber<br />

industry comprised of twelve concessionaires and twenty-five special licences<br />

operating o'n twenty-one-year and ten-year agreements respectively. Other short<br />

term licences on Forms I and 11 were issued in State land forests mainly in clearing<br />

land for agricultural deveop'ment. The statement of production, expenditure and<br />

.income in terms of millions for 1970 was:-<br />

Production Revenue Expenditure Surplus<br />

(cu. ft. hoppus) M$ M$ M$<br />

181.9 79.5 7.6 71.9<br />

From the very b,eginning, foreigners, both European and Cbinese, were taking a<br />

hand in the exploitation, and one American firm joined in later. Native participation<br />

in the timber industry had just started during the last few years. The exploita­<br />

6


154 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

tion itself is intensive. It has become very highly mechanised nowadays and with<br />

the wide application of the well-adapted chain-saw, more forest areas were logged<br />

out each year by various licensees. Loggers in flat and low-lying areas still resort<br />

to the popular tramway. In most of the less rugged and hilly region, tractor/road<br />

extraction is in use, while highlead and skyline systems are used in the more rugged<br />

areas.<br />

Sa'bah is now respected in the world market as one of th·e chief exporters of<br />

tropical hardwood. There has been a steady and marked increase of export of<br />

timber which has now formed a vital part of the national income.<br />

Sabah's best customer is Japan, taking some 66.4 per cent of all exports; Korea<br />

takes 22 per cent, Formosa 5.2 per cent, Hong Kong 4.4 per cent and Australia<br />

1.9 per cent, negligible quantities reaching such distant markets as Germany and<br />

Holland.<br />

As at 31st December, 1970, one ve-neer-plywood and three veneer plants were in<br />

operation and 140 sawmills were registered. These sawmills ranged from a large<br />

band mill to simple one-bench circular mills often powered by lorry engines. The<br />

trend of production for the veneer mills and sawmills has fluctuated considerably<br />

since 1960. It is expected that the out-turn of ve'neers and plywood will increase<br />

but the out-turn of sawn timb-er is not expected to increase for some time yet. The<br />

reason for this is that the producers prefer to export round logs, which are more<br />

profitable than converted timb-er. A large prop'ortio'n of the sawmill out-turn is<br />

disposed of for local consumption; the veneers and veneer-plywood produce are<br />

exported to Japan, United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa and America.<br />

Interest in working mangrove forest was revived in 1966 mainly for mangrove<br />

chip wood for export to Japan. Japan's pulp and paper manufacturers have shown<br />

keen interest in mangrove chips as basic material for rayon and pulp, and this new<br />

industry, which is managed 'by natives, is expected to start by the middle of the<br />

current year; a total area of approximately 500 square miles of mangrove forest<br />

has been allocated. It is envisaged that the wood will be processed in two factories<br />

on the East Coast and the chips will be exported to Japan. These projects will,<br />

no doubt, bring additional revenue to Government and assist towards more<br />

lucrative employment.<br />

Prior to World War 11 very little research work was carrie'd out due to lack of<br />

staff and funds. The little that was done was mostly botanical collecting, though<br />

a start was made on gro,wth and yield studies and small scale planting trials. In<br />

1932 the Research Branch was established. A botanist was appointed in 1953; an<br />

ecologist recruited in 1954; a plantation officer appointed in 1965 and an entomologist<br />

from the Colombo Plan joined the Branch in 1966. The Research Branch<br />

expanded considerably and in 1969 a Senior Research Officer was app,ointed to take<br />

charge of the Branch. There are now five fully qualified senior officers with a<br />

junior staff of over 70 men responsible for the implementation of an extensive<br />

research programme.<br />

The Forest Department continued to send its subordinate staff for training at<br />

Kepong Forest School, West Malaysia, and thirteen officers were sent in 1970;<br />

concurrently, two officers are undergoing training at Mara Institute- of Technology<br />

in West Malaysia; five taking Ranger's Certificate Course in Coimbatore, India;<br />

three taking a <strong>Forestry</strong> Degree in Australia, while two are taking similar courses<br />

in Canada and one in the United Kingdom. The inadequacy of technically trained<br />

staff has been the greatest impedime'nt to the effective management and development<br />

of the State's forest resources. The major bar to progress in the recruitment and<br />

training of local senior officers has been the lack of candidates with adequate basic<br />

education to matriculate at overseas universities and to a certain extent the reluctance<br />

of the local boys with the requisite qualification to take up employment in the<br />

Department. At present Forest Department junior field staff are given training in<br />

the Forest School in Sandakan. Wit'h the increase of staff in the Department these


SOUTH-EAST ASIA 155<br />

facilities are inadequate to provide the necessary training and consequently'it was<br />

proposed in the First Malaysia Plan that a Forest Training School :be established in<br />

Sandakan, and it is hoped the School would be completed by 1973 during the<br />

Second Malaysia Plan.<br />

SARAWAK<br />

Sarawak, o'n the north-west coast of Borneo, has an area of about 48,000 square<br />

miles. Trop'ical rain forest (regrettably much decimated tby shifting cultivation)<br />

covers three quarters of the land. Nearly 12,000 square miles have been constituted<br />

as p·ermanent forests. Some of th,e extensive peat-swamp forests contain valuable<br />

ramin; inland the dipterocarps predominate. Rivers dominate the landscape. The<br />

120-160 inches rainfall is generally spread throughout the year, with moderate<br />

increase during the north east monsoon du'ring from November to March. Humidity<br />

is high but temperatures are moderate. The estimated population in 1969 was<br />

945,000, made up of 314,000 'Chinese, 227,000 Malay and 404,000 others, mainly<br />

indigenous tribes. The Chinese have been responsible for nearly all the commercial<br />

development in Sarawak.<br />

When the first Rajah, James Brooke', took over in 1841, barter with China in<br />

rhinoceros horn, kingfisher feathers, bezoar stones, dammar, camphor and hornbill<br />

ivory (once more valuable than jade) was centuries old. Sta'bilised government and<br />

the growth of Singapore stimulated trading. The inland peoples, Iban, Kayan and<br />

Kenyah, relied on minor forest produce for cash whenever shifting hill-rice cultiva.<br />

tion produced no surplus. Trade at the end of the: century show'ed a meteoric rise<br />

and fall in gutta percha and a spectacular increase in jelutong. Cutch, rattans and<br />

illipe nuts were also exp,orted. '<br />

A Forest Department was established in 1919 by J. P. Mead w'ho built up a small<br />

staff for exploration and reservation under Malayan-type legislation. Progress was<br />

hindered by lack of topographical maps and almost stopped by local opposition<br />

in the early 1930s, when staff was cut from 111 to 32 under economic pressures.<br />

Modified legislation in 1934 allowed rights for hunting and collection of produce<br />

for domestic use in "protected forests," and reservation continued. Only a few<br />

hundred tons of sawn timber were exported to the United Kingdom before 1940:<br />

the high grades demanded and the minute local market prevented expansion.<br />

After the Japanese occupation (1942-45) 'the third Rajah ceded Sarawak to the<br />

Crown. Aerial photographs from the R.A.F. and finance from the C.D. & W.<br />

fund quickened forest development under first a ten- and then a five-year plan. The<br />

great expansion of ramin exports from 1949 concentrated attention on the peatswamps.<br />

An increase in trunk road construction after independence and the<br />

formation of Malaysia in 1963 helped the response to apparently insatiable Japanese<br />

timber demands from inland forests. The Department struggles to maintain<br />

systematic logging even in forests ostensibly destined for agriculture under development<br />

schemes. In 1969 2,418,000 Hoppus tons of timber were produced, of which<br />

2,128,000 tons (88 per cent) were declared to be exported. Whether o'r not this<br />

vast out-turn will be surpassed in future will be a test of policy.<br />

An P.A.O.-directed inventory of the more accessible mixed dipterocarp forests<br />

is in progress (1969-1971) and there is an agreement that areas within the inventory<br />

area will not be licensed until the F.A.O. report on forest industries development<br />

has been received and studied. Log and sawn timber grading is planned for 1971<br />

to help combat competition from Indonesia. A timber research and technical training<br />

centre was at last ope'ned in 1970, aiming at raising the standard of milling and<br />

providing more information on Sarawak timbers; some 2,500 species await attention.<br />

The Department has laboured under staff shortages Which are expected to<br />

continue, unless resistance is successful against emulation of neighbouring territories<br />

seen to be making fortunes by quick-profit policies with insufficient attention to<br />

silvicultural controls.<br />

6*


THE ISLAND TERRITORIES lS7<br />

of the island by the British. In 1879 a Forest Law was enacted providing: for the<br />

protection of forests and for the control of tree felling and the grazing of animals. The<br />

nucleus of the Forest Service was established in 1878 and foresters of French and<br />

German origin, some of them with experience in the Indian Forest Service, were<br />

assigned the task of forest management. M. Madon was appointed Principal Forest<br />

Officer in 1881. The demarcation of State Forests was made in 1884 op the basis of<br />

the Forest Delimitation Law of 1881.<br />

The organisation of the Forest Service evolved and developed over the years: in<br />

1920 Cypriot personnel was sent abroad for training in forestry, in particular at the<br />

Dean <strong>Forestry</strong> School, to man the middle and higher echelons of the Service. Efforts<br />

to free the forest estate from goat grazing were intensified but many of the actions<br />

taken towards this end appeared to the shepherds as "oppressive measures of the<br />

Colonial Power" and their reaction to thenl was often incendiarism.<br />

Intensification of Forest Management<br />

The War effort of 1939-45 diverted attention from local "forestry politics". Through<br />

intensive Public Relations efforts, coupled with economic incentives, the forests were<br />

freed from goat grazing. In 1950 a formal "Statement of Forest Policy" was published<br />

by Government. This policy document placed emphasis on: the protective functions<br />

of forests, namely climatic protection, water and soil conservation; protection to<br />

agriculture; forest reservation with a view to ensuring a prudent balance in the supply<br />

of agricultural and forest products; the use of forests as areas of public amenity and<br />

recreation and as the habitat of wildlife; the production ofraw materials for industries<br />

and the provision of employment.<br />

Education and Research<br />

In 1951, the Cyprus <strong>Forestry</strong> College was opened for the training of local staff and<br />

overseas students. The curriculum provides for a two year intensive course at the subprofessional<br />

level. In less than two decades (1951-69) 200 Cypriot and 75 overseas<br />

students graduated from the College.<br />

In 1954 a <strong>Forestry</strong> Research Division was created and was assigned the task of<br />

investigating silvicultural and general biological problems of forest production.<br />

The Development Decade<br />

Cyprus reached the "take-off" stage in the <strong>Forestry</strong> sector around 1960. By then a<br />

dynamic <strong>Forestry</strong> Organisation manned with appropriately trained Cypriot personnel<br />

at all levels, was available. Through continuous Public Relations campaigns a favourable<br />

public opinion had been created. The Government of the Cyprus Republic<br />

launched its First Five Year Development Plan in 1960. Although competition for<br />

resources among the various sectors of the Country's economy was keen, forestry<br />

had its rightful share of such resources.<br />

Future Prospects<br />

The forests of Cyprus had, have and will continue to have, a significant impact on<br />

the historical, cultural and economic evolution of the Country. They constitute an<br />

invaluable heritage which the people of Cyprus are determined to protect, develop<br />

and rationally mobilize to achieve their aspirations for economic and social advancement<br />

and for a dignified environment to live in.<br />

FIJI<br />

FIJI, A FORMER colony, was ceded to the British Crown by the Chiefs of the autochthonous<br />

Melanesian-Polynesian inhabitants in 1874; it gained its Independence and<br />

became a Dominion in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> ofNations on 10th October, 1970. It is a<br />

mqlti-racial society and almost 50 per cent of the total population of 525,000 is made<br />

up of Indians.


THE WEST INDIES<br />

BRITISH HONDURAS<br />

BRITISH HONDURAS IS the only part of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> in Central America. In the<br />

early years of the 17th century it formed a refuge for buccaneers from the Spaniards<br />

but its first settlement about 1665 and its continued occupation were due to its valuable<br />

forest produce. In 1671 the Governor of Jamaica reported that the logwood (Haematoxylon<br />

campechianum) trade "increased His Majesty's Customs and the national<br />

commerce more than any of His Majesty's colonies." Later, mahogany (Swietenia<br />

macrophylla) exploitation became more important and this is the species for which<br />

British Honduras is best known. Apart from regulations governing the size of merchantable<br />

logs and a law for the preservation of young mahogany in 1838, no attempt<br />

at any sort ofcontrol or management seems to have been made until E. D. M. Hooper<br />

recommended in 1886 the establishment of a Forest Department, which was not done.<br />

The Crown Lands Ordinance 1886 however authorised the Survey Department to issue<br />

licences to cut forest produce on Crown Lands, but apart from pre-payment of royalty<br />

and checking of numbers of stumps, there was no adequate control.<br />

In 1921, C. Hummel reported on the Forests of British Honduras, with suggestions<br />

for a far reaching forest policy and in 1922 he was appointed to take charge of a newly<br />

created Forest Department. In 1923 a Forest Ordinance vested administration and<br />

control ofthe Department and the development and management ofthe Crown forests<br />

in a Forest Trust, financed by a statutory contribution of 60 per cent of the forest<br />

revenue of the colony and a Forest Loan of 250,000 dollars.<br />

Hummel's report was the basis of the accepted forest policy of the Government, and<br />

it was revised in 1947 and again in 1954 when it was published over the signature of<br />

the Governor and emphasised the necessity to establish and preserve<br />

for all time and develop the forest estate, which, as declared Forest Reserve, now<br />

amounts to 20 per cent of the land area. Under the Forest Ordinance and its later<br />

revisions, and with adequate finance, the foundation of the forest estate was laid,<br />

protection was established and more efficient exploitation was encouraged by the<br />

granting of longer term licences and brought under more adequate, stricter control;<br />

staff and labour were recruited and trained, enumeration and mapping of the forests<br />

was given high priority and the silviculture of mahogany, cedar (Cedrela mexicana)<br />

and pine (Pinus caribaea), begun in 1922, made rapid progress. The utilisation of other<br />

woods was encouraged and the most promising were tested at Princes Risborough.<br />

Botanical collections were made, an herbarium was founded and in co-operation with<br />

Yale University and the Forest Department, the Field Museum published a Flora.<br />

Silvicultural and other research was done on the most promising secondary woods,<br />

controlled burning in pine areas, the establishment of plantations of mahogany, pine<br />

and some exotics, the use of second growth species for papermaking, the tapping of<br />

naval stores, chicle (Achras spp) and fig (Ficus spp) latex, seed collection, the improvement<br />

of local sawmiIling, encouragement of other utilisation and minor industries etc.<br />

In 1929 economic depression necessitated reduction of expenditure and staff and<br />

serious limitation ofactivities; hurricanes in 1931, 1941 and 1942 destroyed the forests<br />

where most of the silvicultural work had been done and in 1931 the Forest Trust was<br />

abolished and the statutory contribution of60 per cent offorest revenue lost to the Department.<br />

During the lean years of depression, a forest type map of the whole country<br />

was compiled from the work done previously and under Colonial Development and<br />

Welfare grant the forest associations were examined, enumerated and described in<br />

much greater detail. A commencement was also made on pine plantation and progressed<br />

well.<br />

In 1944 a Development Plan for the forests on Crown Land was prepared, and later,<br />

legislation was enacted to afford some measure of control over the exploitation of<br />

privately owned forests. In the late 1940s intensive fire protection on the Mountain<br />

160


162 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

In 1957 a large scale reafforestation,project was launched. This was made imperative<br />

as a direct answer to Hurricane Janet of 1955 which devastated over 75 per cent of tree<br />

crops on the island. Productivity is handicapped by a rugged, mountainous topography,<br />

lack of mechanisation and the dependence on foreign aid for development.<br />

Since 1957 two million board feet of timber were salvaged from hurricane-damaged<br />

areas. During the same period some 750 acres of plantations have been established<br />

using such species as: Swietenia macrophylla, Tectona grandis, Cedrela mexicana,<br />

Hibiscus elatus, Pinus caribaea and various Cupressus species. All are showing promise.<br />

GUYANA<br />

(formerly British Guiana)<br />

THE FIRST RECORDS of forestry operations in Guyana date to 1624 when there was<br />

already an established barter trade for letter-wood (Piratinera guianensis) and "Oriane<br />

dye" (annatto). Thereafter until the latter part of the 18th century, the cutting of<br />

letter-wood completely dominated the timber industry. However, by the year 1800 the<br />

export of greenheart (Ocotea rodiaei) was firmly established and it was also being<br />

used locally for framing, posts etc.-all sawn lumber being imported, mainly from<br />

Canada, as late as the last quarter of the 19th century. By 1880, there were three<br />

sawmills in the country and this number has grown slowly to 81 in 1970. Meanwhile,<br />

greenheart continued to dominate both the export trade and local use-it still accounts<br />

for some 60 per cent of the total lumber production.<br />

Through all these years, there was absolutely no control on wood-cutting operations<br />

-until 1890 when the first Crown Lands Regulations were passed. Even then control<br />

was minimal and the vicious practice of creaming (for greenheart mainly) became<br />

deeply engrained in the industry. Responsibility for the forests rested with the Commissioner<br />

of Lands and Mines who was later (1910) given a Forest Officer and some<br />

Forest Rangers as a part of the staff of the Lands Department. Despite difficulties,<br />

excellent work (e.g. forest valuations) was done by these officers but by 1925 it had<br />

become very apparent that the mere investigational work which forestry required itself<br />

demanded a full-time staff and so a Forest Department, independent of the Lands and<br />

Mines Department, was established in that year.<br />

However, control of the forest and of wood-cutting operations remained with the<br />

Commissioner of Lands until 1953-54 when the Crown Forests Ordinance and<br />

Regulations were passed. In the meanwhile, however, the Forest Department had<br />

steadily pursued a most comprehensive programme of investigation and research<br />

which included forest valuations, botanical identification and collections, physical and<br />

mechanical (strength) testing of the most abundant species, seasoning properties<br />

(together with operation of a seasoning yard), investigation of minor forest products<br />

and silvicultural research with particular reference to the regeneration of greenheart.<br />

In 1950, Government adopted a formal Statement of Forest Policy. Among other<br />

things, this policy accepted the need for integration of forestry with other land uses<br />

and asserted the further need for management on the basis of sustained yield. It also<br />

accepted the necessity for developing markets, at home and abroad, for all worthwhile<br />

species. One of the direct results of the acceptance of this policy was that the statutory<br />

control of the forests had to be vested in the Forest Department. This came about in<br />

1954 with the passing of the Forests Regulations and the gazetting of one continuous<br />

block of Crown Forests (29,000 square miles).<br />

The year also saw the first Development Plan. Assisted by grants from the Colonial<br />

Development and Welfare Scheme, several projects were put forward viz: staff<br />

training, appraisals, silvicultural research and also for the production and marketing<br />

of unknown but worthwhile species. During the ensuing years very useful work was<br />

accomplished in many sectors. By 1962, eight Guyanese had been trained overseas and<br />

had secured professional degrees in forestry, and there had been considerable training<br />

of subordinate staff. Appraisals (over limited areas)-aided by forest type mapping<br />

based upon the interpretation of aerial photographs-had clearly shown that the


THE WEST INDmS<br />

problem of securing the economic exploitation of the forests would be solved" only<br />

with the full use of all worthwhile species. At the same time, it became evident that tbe<br />

regeneration ofgreenheart, per se, though possible, would be too expensive a method of<br />

securing the continuance of the forest estate and of reaching towards sustained yield.<br />

The political problems and upheavals ofthe"early 19608 greatly hindered the development<br />

of forestry, but in the latter part of the decade, government, a.ssisted by the<br />

U.N.S.F. set about a systematic programme of surveying and assessing the forest<br />

development potential of Guyana. All aspects of forestry were included-valuations,<br />

logging and transport studies, marketing, preservation, sawmill improvement, reorganisation<br />

of the department's timber plant and feasibility studies for other woodusing<br />

industries. This project has only recently (1970) terminated and it is, unfortunately,<br />

yet too early to attempt to forecast what paths the development of forestry will pursue<br />

in the critical years which lie immediately ahead in the life of a young developing<br />

nation.<br />

JAMAICA<br />

THE TOTAL LAND area ofJamaica is 4243.6 square miles ofwhich 24 per cent is forested.<br />

However, more than 70 per cent of the forest land has been heavily creamed whilst the<br />

remaining natural forest is still comparatively inaccessible. At present, State forests<br />

occupy 274,000 acres (or 10 per cent of the land area) with about 20,000 acres in forest<br />

plantations.<br />

The Department was officially created in 1942 under the leadership of Mr. Christopher<br />

Swabey, later head of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau. Prior to this, forestry<br />

activity was concerned mainly with the reservation and demarcation of the Forest<br />

Estate and a series of investigations and reports about the dangers of deforestation<br />

dating as far back as 1886. The first ten years of the work of the Department was<br />

largely financed by a grant of £156,880 from the Colonial Development and Welfare<br />

Organisation, and included an annual afforestation programme of about 400 acres.<br />

While continuing the extension of this conservation-oriented programme, the Forest<br />

Department also fostered the birth of the Watersheds Protection Commission in 1957,<br />

which became a separate agency in 1960. Having started with one professional and 10<br />

field officers, the staff complement now provides for six professional and 40 nonprofessional<br />

officers.<br />

The early forest plantings were carried out to cover up the scars of indiscriminate<br />

deforestation caused by shifting agriculture, and have resulted in a large number of<br />

species/age classes scattered throughout the forest estate. With the attainment of<br />

political independence in 1962, a plan underlying the possible role of forestry in the<br />

development of the national economy was approved and the annual planting programme<br />

was increased to 1,600 acres in 1963 largely in an attempt ultimately to<br />

replace imported forest products, to provide job opportunities in rural areas and to<br />

increase production from land of low productivity. By 1968 this annual target was<br />

increased to 3,000 acres and 15 miles of access roads, providing casual employment for<br />

nearly 10,000 individuals in that particular year.<br />

At the same time in 1967 a five year project sponsored jointly by the Government<br />

and the United Nations Special Fund (F.A.O.) got under way to provide the necessary<br />

information on which to base long term development plans for forestry and watershed<br />

management. In general, the <strong>Forestry</strong> side of the project is concerned with detailed<br />

mapping of the Forest Estate, an inventory of natural forests and plantations, silvicultural<br />

research, feasibility studies of forest industries and the preparation of<br />

management plans for specific areas. The Watershed Management part of the programmeis<br />

providingbothdemonstrationandtraining opportunities useful in developing<br />

an island-wide programme for conserving soil and water resources in upland regions.<br />

In addition to its normal forestry activities, the Department has been providing<br />

modest recreation facilities in the scenic areas of the forest and with the recent increase


THE WEST INDmS 165<br />

is being increased by 200 annually. In 1954, enrichment planting of mixed hardwoods<br />

was started. There are 1,100 acres, increasing annually by 75.<br />

Exploitation, Trade and Industries<br />

Control of exploitation is effected either by minimum girth limits or by restricting<br />

exploitation within annually demarcated ,blocks. A swing to mechanisation i.e. from<br />

axes to power saws and from bulls to farm tractors has taken place in most of the<br />

harvesting operations.<br />

The annual yield from Government forests stands at 18.5 million bd. ft. yet Trinidad<br />

and Tobago is heavily dependent on timber imports averaging 22.5 million bd. ft. arid<br />

costing $6.5 million T.T. Export principally offurniture timbers average 0.5 million bd.<br />

ft. at a value of $200,000 T.T. '<br />

Many of the timbers which were not formerly used are now more widely accepted as<br />

a result ofadvances in science and technology and also as the forests become more and<br />

more inaccessible. There are 65 sawmills in the country. The Trinidad Match factory<br />

using Jereton (Didymopanax morototoni) consumed 84,000 cu. ft. in 1969. In 1970 a<br />

parquet tile industry utilising various local woods commenced operations. There are<br />

three preservative plants-Boliden K, Celcure and Wolman Salts. There are also<br />

several wood working industries which are manufacturing doors,windows, furniture<br />

and handicrafts. The Division also has its own sawmill, creosoting and fencing plants<br />

for the utilisation ofsmall size teak thinnings. There are no pulpmills, plywood, veneer<br />

or particle board industries.<br />

Research<br />

Most of the present research work is concentrated in the following fields:<br />

(i) Planting trials of both local and exotic species.<br />

(ii) The use of fertilisers in Teak and Pine Plantations.<br />

(Hi) Variations in Teak and Pine spacing.<br />

(iv) Tree Breeding-selection of plus trees, observations on clonal gardens, one<br />

parent progeny trials and establishment of seed orchards.<br />

(v) The effect of drainage on Teak and Pine in seasonally waterloged areas.<br />

(vi) Thinning experiments in Teak and Pines.<br />

To date, none of these have been concluded. However, investigations in 1966<br />

revealed that pine logs are very susceptible to blue stain but could be controlled by<br />

spraying with 0.1 per cent gamma B.H.C. In 1967, because of the possibility ofdisease<br />

introduction (Neetria eueurbitula) a ban was placed on the importation of live Xmas<br />

trees.<br />

Staff<br />

At present there are only five professional officers including the Conservator, :hiS<br />

Deputy and an officer on loan under U.K. Technical Assistance Scheme. The subordinate<br />

monthly paid field staff comprises 118 persons of which 11 are trained. Daily<br />

paid employees number 160 permanent labourers and approximately 550 casuals.<br />

Training<br />

In 1967 a United Nations Special Fund project to provide training for subordinate<br />

technical staff to serve Trinidad and Tobago primarily and the West Indies in general<br />

was launched. The course is for two years and a Diploma is awarded on successful<br />

completion. 12 persons have already graduated, the annual intake being six. ·Three<br />

persons pursuing professional degrees are expected in 1971 and 1973.<br />

Wildlife and Tourism<br />

Attempts are being made to re-stock Little Tobago with Paradisea apoda (Bird of<br />

Paradise) since the original number of 48 at the time of introduction had dwindled to<br />

approximately seven partly through sterility and partly through Hurricane Flora in<br />

1963. The Caroni Game Sanctuary in Trinidad has become a popular attraction both<br />

for local and oversea tourists. There are now over 12,000 Scarlet Ibis roosting in this<br />

area.


. ,<br />

FORMER COMMONWEALTH TERRITORIES<br />

PALESTINE<br />

There is evidence to show that in biblical times Palestine was well wooded. At the<br />

time ofthe Crusades accounts ofbattles make frequent reference to forests. Destruction<br />

offorest cover has been progressive throughout history and accelerated in the last one<br />

hundred years. At the commencement ofthe British Mandate in 1923 all that remained<br />

of the natural vegetation were a few pitiful grazed-down fragments barely enough to<br />

conceal the herds of goats which had been chiefly -responsible for its destruction.<br />

The Report of the Palestine Administration 1920-21 recognised the need for reforestation<br />

and protection of surviving trees and proposed the promulgation of a<br />

"Woods and Forests" Ordinance based on the Cyprus Laws. This work was initially<br />

entrusted to the staff of the Department of Agriculture.<br />

In 1926 a new Forests Ordinance was passed authorising the establishment of<br />

Forest Reserves on uncultivated land which was not private property, and providing<br />

for their protection.<br />

It was itnpossible for the Agricultural Officers to devote adequate time to the<br />

demarcation, survey and protection of Forest Reserves. In 1930 therefore a separate<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> section was set up in the Department of Agriculture and Forests. The staff<br />

of the section though hampered by lack of funds and frustrated by Land Settlement<br />

procedure, could at least concentrate on their tasks. The realisation of the ruinous<br />

condition of the hill-country was slowly gowing, and the establishment of a separate<br />

Department of Forests in 1936 seemed to indicate a determination to act on a scale<br />

more commensurate with the vastness of the problem. However, the outbreak of<br />

civil disturbances, mush more widespread and prolonged than any since the beginning<br />

of the Mandate, put a stop to hopes of expansion. From March 1936 to the summer of<br />

1939 the main "objects of management" were to protect the Reserves from encroachments<br />

and where possible the vegetation from destruction, without loss of life or limb.<br />

Efforts in these directions were more successful than might have been expected.<br />

The outbreak of World War II not unnaturally altered the position, and internal<br />

security improved. No steps were taken to import stocks of firewood from Turkey<br />

before the sea route was closed, and a great strain was put on the battered remnants<br />

of the vegetation in Palestine by military and civilian demands for firewood.<br />

During the war it proved possible to form a Soil Conservation Board, with official<br />

and unofficial members all concerned with different aspects of soil erosion and its<br />

effects. In 1941, the Flooding and Soil Erosion (Prevention) Ordinance was passed<br />

under which several specially dangerous slopes were gazetted as Special Areas and<br />

subjected to certain restrictive controls. The Tiberias Special Area came under the care<br />

ofthe Department ofForests, which was able to act effectively to prevent the repetition<br />

of recent past annual damage and occasional catastrophes.<br />

In 1945, the Public Committee for Soil Conservation, an organisation of Jewish<br />

fanners, was formed, and in three years converted almost all Jewish Agriculture to<br />

soil-conserving practices.<br />

A revised Forest Ordinance, passed in 1948, cleared up many anomalies in the old<br />

law, gave more control over private land, and in general would have proved a more<br />

effective weapon in the perpetual struggle for forest protection.<br />

By the end of the Mandate in 1948 and in spite of constant civil disturbances, the<br />

Forest Department had accomplished a great deal. Some 84,300 hectares of Forest<br />

Reserves had been gazetted of which 83 per cent had been demarcated. Unfortunately<br />

complete protection from grazing and browsing had only been extended to some 9 per<br />

cent of the area.<br />

aetween the two wars output offorest produce was restricted to firewood and small<br />

hardwood billets, chiefly oak. It is recorded that any figures would be meaningless<br />

as the amount removed illicitly always exceeded that removed legitimately. During<br />

lS6


FORMER COMMONWEALTH TERRITORIES 169<br />

in 1932. This laid down a division of function between the Department operating<br />

within the Ministry of Agriculture, and the Provincial Authorities in the Adininistration<br />

of the country's forests. The Chief Conservator became responsible for<br />

supplying the central needs of the country in timber and wood fuel to government<br />

departments and the larger towns, while the Provincial Authorities were responsible<br />

for ensuring permanent supplies of forest produce for local and village use. While<br />

the central Reserves grew in number from the outset, Provincial Reserves tended to<br />

stagnate and never became fully operative.<br />

The first major step was the inauguration of sawmilling on the Blue Nile and in<br />

the south to supply railway sleepers and a modest quantity of furniture wood, under<br />

the supervision of expatriate staff but manned entirely by Sudanese, who had to be<br />

trained from scratch. At the same time central Forest Reserves were surveyed and<br />

gazetted. At the outbreak of war the Department was well placed to meet the extraordinary<br />

demands made upon it. The sawmilling programme was increased by the<br />

installation of additional mills, the introduction of the hand sawing of railway<br />

sleepers, the organisation of animal transport to replace lorries, the use of rafts to<br />

supplement the river services and a road building programme to open up otherwise<br />

inaccessible areas. Among the projects undertaken was the erection of a Charcoal<br />

Briquetting Plant involving many experiments with differing types of pitch as binder.<br />

The demand for firewood and charcoal grew to major proportions, over 1,000 tons<br />

of the former and 250 tons of the latter being put on rail weekly, in addition to the<br />

increased local demands for domestic fuel, industry, and a busy fleet of river steamers.<br />

At the end of the war the opportunity was taken to open a Forest Rangers School<br />

at Khartoum, with members of the demobilised Sudan Defence Force as the first<br />

intake. A start was also made with sending students to Edinburgh to take the normal<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Degree.<br />

With less pressure on production, reservation and reafforestation of the acacia<br />

reserves was expanded together with the introduction of exotics, in the north by the<br />

formation of irrigated eucalyptus plantations, in the south by extended plantings of<br />

Tectona grandis on the plains and Cupressus lusitanica in the hills.<br />

The gradual replacement of woodbuming steamers by diesels lowered the dem.ands<br />

on the riverside wood stations to such an extent that the Department gave up the<br />

hire of the old stern wheeler, which for so many years had provided home and<br />

transport for the White Nile Assistant Conservator, and additionally free transport to<br />

the Game Warden for any animals, from lion downwards, being moved from the<br />

south to Khartoum and European zoos.<br />

Soil conservation was tackled with vigour by an interdepartm.ental committee,<br />

although the physical complementation was largely left in the hands of the Forest<br />

Department. Green Belts were planted and maintained round major towns and local<br />

measures were aided elsewhere. The introduction of trout from Kenya to the mountain<br />

streams of the Southern Sudan, a major administrative feat, was cheerfully<br />

undertaken.<br />

However the result of the Forest Department's efforts may best be judged by the<br />

efficiency and enthusiasm of the Sudanese who were able to carry on and expand<br />

the reservation and planting programmes. The first Sudanese Chief Conservator<br />

Kamel Shawki was appointed in 1955 immediately prior to the country becoming<br />

an Independent Republic in 1956.


BRITISH UNIVERSITIE8-DEPARTMENTS OF FORESTRY<br />

FORESTRY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AT<br />

OXFORD UNIVERSITY<br />

The School of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

THE SCHOOL of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Oxford University was opened in 1905, as a result of the<br />

closure of the Royal Indian Engineering College at Cooper's Hill near Windsor where<br />

probationers for the Indian Forest Service had been trained under Sir William<br />

Schlich for the previous 19 years. Prolonged discussions had taken place as to<br />

how and where the probationers should be trained. Schlich was emphatic that it<br />

should be at a University. Also, on account of the small numbers, it should be concentrated<br />

in one place. It was only after strong persuasion that Oxford University<br />

agreed to establish the school. Contributory factors were the strong support received<br />

from St. John's College, which not only put the facilities of Bagley Wood, which<br />

they owned, at the disposal of the School for practical work but, in 1908, provided<br />

a new building for the School adjoining the School of Rural Economy which they had<br />

also built. '<br />

Despite Schlich's strongest representations, the University was unwilling to accept<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> as a degree subject, but a Diploma was instituted, the qualifications for entry<br />

requiring a University degree. Several months' practical work on the Continent was<br />

required very much as in the Cooper's Hill days. Up to the outbreak of war in 1914,<br />

118 men had taken the Diploma, 91 of whom went to India.<br />

Schlich retired in 1919. Prior to that he had made strong representations for the<br />

endowment of a University Chair in <strong>Forestry</strong> but his wish was only fulfilled in 1919<br />

after his retirement in that year. The Professorship was attached to St. John's College<br />

at its request, and R. S. Troup, a member of the Indian Forest Service and a former<br />

pupil of Schlich (at Cooper's Hill) was elected.<br />

After the war the degree qualification for entry was waived and <strong>Forestry</strong> became a<br />

three-year Pass Degree subject, though the Diploma was continued for some years.<br />

Between 1919 and 1927 205 men passed through the school of whom 107 went to<br />

India.<br />

In 1926, India started training her own officers and recruitment from the U.K.<br />

ceased altogether in 1933. Though this caused a sudden drop in numbers, the increasing<br />

demands of the Colonial Service largely took its place. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission<br />

also sent a steady though small number of men for training.<br />

A case for making <strong>Forestry</strong> an Honours degree was put to the University in 1936<br />

but was rejected by a narrow majority.<br />

When the Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute was founded in 1924 the School of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

retained its separate organisation and administration, though most of the staff and<br />

facilities were shared. Prof. Troup was the Head of both institutions. In 1938 a fundamental<br />

change was made as the School and the Institute were amalgamated into the<br />

"Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>".<br />

The Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute<br />

At the first Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held in London in 1920, the need for an<br />

Empire centre for advanced studies and research in forestry was stressed. The proposals<br />

of the Conference were however turned down on grounds of financial stringency.<br />

The matter was however brought up again at the second Empire Conference in Canada<br />

in 1923, and backed by the findings of an Interdepartmental Committee under the<br />

Chairmanship of Lord Clinton, it was decided to establish an Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Institute at Oxford and that it should be linked with the <strong>Forestry</strong> School with Professor<br />

Troup as its first Director. Accommodation and some staff were to be shared with<br />

the School and some extra staff recruited. It actually came into being in 1924. It was<br />

supervised by a Board of Governors whose first Chairman was Lord Clinton, and<br />

170


BRITISH UNIVERSITIES-DEPARTMENTS OF FORESTRY 111<br />

financed by grants from the Colonial Office and the <strong>Forestry</strong>Commisslonancf"by<br />

contributions from Colonial and Dominion Governments.<br />

The activities ofthe Institute rapidly increased. Further accommodation soonbecaJne<br />

an urgent necessity and was provided by temporary expedients. By 1936 the administrative<br />

load on the Professor had become so heavy that in order to relieve the burden t<br />

a separate Director, Mr. J. N. Oliphant with no teaching commitments was appointed,<br />

leaving the Professor still in overall charge. However the divided responsibility was<br />

found to be so unsatisfactory, that a Committee was set up to consider the complete<br />

re-organisation of all the forestry activities within the University. As a result it was<br />

decided to amalgamate the Institute and the School into a unified Department of<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong>, and, as far as the University was concerned, the Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute<br />

ceased to exist except as the name of the building in which the new Department of<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> worked.<br />

However the functions of the School in the education of foresters for their first<br />

degree and for those proceeding to higher degrees remained as before and the Institute<br />

functions of post graduate training of Forest Officers, running special courses required<br />

for Empire forestry, collecting and disseminating information, etc. carried on as<br />

previously. Finances were also kept separate, so that in fact there was not much change<br />

except for the fact that all the staff and all the facilities ofthe Department were equally<br />

available and better coordination of activities was achieved.<br />

Professor Troup died rather suddenly in 1939 just after all this upheaval, and H. G.<br />

Champion was called from India to succeed him. He was the third in line of ex­<br />

Indian Forest Service officers to fill the post, and both he and Troup had made a<br />

mark itl India as Central Silviculturists at the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun.<br />

The Department of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

The second World War had broken out by the time Champion took the chair. The<br />

new Department had hardly had time to settle down when it was disrupted by war<br />

requirements. It was still in very crowded and inconvenient accommodation, though<br />

plans for a big new building had been almost finalised and action had been taken to<br />

start raising money. As long ago as 1930, £25,000 out of a most munificent gift made<br />

by H.R. the Rajah of Sarawak for furthering Colonial interests was allocated to the<br />

Institute for a new building. Support was promised from the Rhodes and Pilgrim<br />

Trusts and some smaller donations were received. A grant of £45,000 was made by<br />

the Colonial Development and Welfare Fund bringing the total up to the estimated<br />

cost in 1938. A site in the science area in S. Parks Road had been allocated and plans<br />

had been drawn up by Sir Hubert Worthington, A.R.A so that everything was ready<br />

to begin work as soon as hostilities ceased. Costs had, in the meantime, risen and the<br />

University made good the difference between the 1938 and 1945 estimates. Meanwhile<br />

an appeal was made at the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held in London and Oxford<br />

in 1947 for gifts of timber for panelling and furnishing the Institute. This met with<br />

universal and generous response. Wood of over 60 species was received and used for<br />

panelling, flooring, doors, furniture etc. throughout the building. The building was<br />

formally opened by H.R.H. Princess Margaret on 19th October, 1950.<br />

Students were relatively few during the war but immediately after there was a big<br />

demand for forest officers for the Colonial territories and classes, both at the undergraduate<br />

and post graduate levels were full. Much new research was started and several<br />

important compilations were issued. Champion retired in 1959 after 19 very productive<br />

years in the Chair.<br />

He was succeeded by M. V. Laurie who was the last of the line ofex-Indian Forest<br />

Service officers to hold the post and who had also, been Central Silviculturist at Dehra<br />

Dun like his two predecessors. Considerable changes were taking place in the forestry<br />

scene. Many former Colonies had achieved independence and were staffing their<br />

Forest Departments with their own nationals. Several countries started training<br />

their own men notably Nigeria, New Zealand and more recently East Africa at<br />

Makerere. Numbers of undergraduates wishing to read forestry fell to uneconomic


174 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

He was appointed Lecturer in <strong>Forestry</strong> in 1912 and subsequently became Professor<br />

of <strong>Forestry</strong>-a post he held with distinction until his retirement in 1947.<br />

The Department was closed down in 1916-19 when the staff were engaged in<br />

timber acquisition work for the First World War. It was revived in 1920 when, in<br />

addition to the degree and diploma courses, several short courses were arranged for<br />

ex-Service men. From 1922 to 1945 the number of <strong>Forestry</strong> students remained<br />

remarkably steady with a total complement of 12 to 15 per year. In addition, an equal<br />

number of Agricultural students followed courses in the Department. This close-knit<br />

community, despite its small size, exerted a strong influence on the wider sphere of<br />

College activities and during the inter-war period the lists of student officials, both<br />

athletic and social, are liberally sprinkled with the names of past foresters. One may<br />

also assume, since these students attained positions of authority at home and abroad<br />

in forest enterprises, that they obtained a sound grounding in <strong>Forestry</strong> both within<br />

the College and on vacation tours in France, the New Forest and the Dean. It is<br />

rumoured that Bangor foresters became so well known to the landlady of a farm<br />

guest house in the Dean from the early twenties that she used to greet all overseas<br />

visitors with the standard query, "No pork, no beef, or no meat at all?" When under<br />

wartime conditions of rationing she mistakenly applied this question to a dark-haired,<br />

quick-witted Celt from South Wales, she received the prompt reply-"Don't worry<br />

luv, I'll eat duck or chicken."<br />

After the Second World War the number of students in the Department increased<br />

substantially and for the period 1945 to 1965 remained steady at 50-55 per year, of<br />

which about a quarter came from overseas. In 1947, Professor E. C. Mobbs was<br />

appointed to the Chair of <strong>Forestry</strong> and in 1952 an Honours degree was instituted.<br />

The Department was one of the first to have a new building in the post-war development.<br />

It was opened in 1955.<br />

The introduction of an Honours degree and the modern facilities available in the<br />

new building led to a rapid expansion in research within the Department as well as<br />

providing an impetus to the continual updating of the undergraduate courses. Later,<br />

with the addition of a General degree (with Honours classification), students were<br />

able to study other related subjects in depth, such as Economics, Entomology and<br />

Plant Biology, in conjunction with <strong>Forestry</strong>.<br />

In 1966, on Professor Mobbs' retirement, Professor S. D. Richardson was appointed<br />

to the Chair of <strong>Forestry</strong> and soon dispelled any lingering illusions that a Chair was<br />

meant for the sedentary control of committees or that <strong>Forestry</strong> was bound by the<br />

accumulated traditions ofthe past. The forests (and primitive art) offar off West Irian,<br />

Swaziland or Ghana were discussed in the Department as freely as those of nearby<br />

Gwydyr or Clocaenog; and students argued more about economic appraisals and<br />

business management than silvicultural systems.<br />

Another major step forward was taken in 1968 when the University ofWales became<br />

the first University in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> to offer an Honours degree in Wood Science.<br />

The course is designed to fill a gap in full-time education for the timber trade and woodusing<br />

industries, and the syllabus includes the three major fields of Wood as a Raw<br />

Material; Timber Utilisation; and Economics and Business Studies. The extensive<br />

alterations made to the basement of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department have provided teaching<br />

and research facilities for wood anatomy, veneering, pulp evaluation, kiln drying,<br />

timber preservation and the mechanical and chemical study of wood. Also in 1968,<br />

the Natural Environment Research Council approved a substantial grant for the<br />

establishment of a Xylem Physiology Research Unit and the Museum was converted<br />

into research laboratories equipped with growth chambers.<br />

Relations between staff and students have always been good, and it would appear<br />

that <strong>Forestry</strong>"attracts young men who, although imbued with a spirit of independence<br />

and possessing strong personalities, express themselves in a constructive and cooperative<br />

manner. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Society, organised and run by students, has published<br />

a learned journal ("Y Coedwigwr") since 1948. In 1965 they inaugurated a three-day


176 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

would become that of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Natural Resources. Dr. C. J. Taylor acted as Head<br />

of Department until Professor J. N. Black arrived in Edinburgh in January 1964. The<br />

new Professor had been Reader in Crop Ecology at the Waite Agricultural Research<br />

Institute.<br />

In all 839 students have graduated B.Sc. (<strong>Forestry</strong>). This degree was replaced in 1966<br />

by the B.Sc. (Ecol.Sc.) with its four Honours Schools of Ecology, <strong>Forestry</strong>, Resource<br />

Management and Wildlife and Fisheries Management. Implementation of the new<br />

course was made possible by the move to a new and very well equipped building in 1968<br />

and an increase in teaching staff to 14. Teaching and the obligatory field courses aim to<br />

produce graduates with a proper appreciation of the processes controlling biological<br />

production and with a good grounding in management and economics. As specialisation,<br />

in its accepted sense, does not take place till the 4th year, the students appreciate<br />

the overall need-for co-operation in resource management and planning. At the same<br />

time there has been a big increase in postgraduate studies in the Department.<br />

THE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY,<br />

CAMBRIDGE<br />

THF FOLLOWING ACCOUNT of the short-lived School of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Cambridge (1909-33)<br />

has been compiled from information supplied by the sole surviving member of the<br />

teaching staff, Mr. E. H. B. Boulton, lecturer on timber technology. <strong>Forestry</strong> was<br />

introduced as a subject at Cambridge in 1909 in conjunction with the Department of<br />

Agriculture. Classes were held in two rented rooms in the Swiss Cafe in Benet Street.<br />

Initially tuition was given by a series of external lecturers including Dr. A. Henry,<br />

co-author of "Trees of Great Britain". The first two students were Mr. A. P. Long,<br />

later a <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioner and a Japanese. The first Reader in <strong>Forestry</strong> was<br />

Professor William Dawson from the School of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Aberdeen, appointed in<br />

1913; at Aberdeen he had held the title of Professor and although only a Reader at<br />

Cambridge continued to use the title on the grounds that "once a Professor, always a<br />

Professor". His arrival coincided with the completion ofa fine new School of<strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />

a building which up to the time of its closure was undoubtedly the finest and best<br />

equipped forestry school in Britain. (It is now the School of Geography.)<br />

At the outbreak of the 1914-18 War this new building became the headquarters of<br />

the Eastern Counties Timber Production Board under the control of the recently<br />

appointed Reader in <strong>Forestry</strong>; he was awarded the O.B.E. for this work.<br />

In 1918 the School was again opened for teaching. In the immediate post-war years<br />

ex-members of the forces were given short courses and awarded Diplomas. Normal<br />

entrants took a three-year Pass Degree, not entirely a satisfactory arrangement as the<br />

Colonial Office, at that time the biggest recruiting agency, required candidates to take<br />

a Post-Graduate fourth year at Oxford. Meanwhile in 1922 the Cambridge Diploma<br />

as a short course was abolished and replaced by a Diploma requiring fourth year<br />

studies and a thesis.<br />

The School of <strong>Forestry</strong> building is worthy of mention. Every room, corridor and<br />

classroom featured some special timber. The Reader's room was panelled in Brown<br />

Oak with Yew block flooring. The laboratory benches were all in Pyinkadu, then a<br />

comparatively unknown timber, the preparation and fitting of which was all done<br />

personally by Mr. BOldton and the late Mr. H. A. Cox. In the basement ofthe building<br />

was a complete workshop with circular saws, planers, four-cutters and a lathe. The two<br />

teaching floors provided lecture rooms, library, laboratory and staff rooms. A third<br />

floor provided accommodation for miscellaneous exhibits.<br />

The School's timber collection at the time of "dissolution" amounted to 3,600<br />

specimens cut in four foot planks mounted on dowels, all with matching hand<br />

specimens. This collection had been started by Mr. Herbert Stone, a famous character<br />

who delivered his lectures on timber in a skull cap, puffing clouds of smoke over his<br />

classes from a large cherrywood pipe. On the closure of the School this timber collection<br />

was divided equally between F.P.R.L., Princes Risborough and The City ofLondon


BRITISH UNIVERSITIES-DEPARTMENTS OF FORESTRY 171<br />

College. The Princes Risborough share is still intact, the City of London College share<br />

was destroyed in the Blitz.<br />

A visiting lecturer worthy of mention 'was Mr. Warburton, Entomology, who died<br />

quite recently at the great age of 105. In the interests of science he once permitted a<br />

warble fly to deposit an egg on his wrist, some months later the warble had to be<br />

removed from the back of his throat under an anaesthetic.<br />

In the late twenties came the Great Depression, Colonial Office recruitment came to<br />

a standstill, the I.F.S. had embarked on Indianisation, grants ceased and as the Schooi<br />

received no finance from the University Chest the writing was on the wall. The School<br />

closed in 1933.<br />

In retrospect it is doubtful whether the continuation of the School would have been<br />

justified bearing in mind the fact that Oxford had been chosen as the site for the<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute.<br />

Cambridge can claim to have been the forerunner in the teaching of timber<br />

technology and for that, if nothing else, its brief existence was justified. The inaugural<br />

meeting of the International Association of Wood Anatomists was held at the School<br />

in' 1924 under the Chairmanship of Mr. Boulton, founder.Jllembers including Jean<br />

Collardet of Ecole de Bois, Paris, Professor Record of Yale, Dr. Swain and Dr:<br />

Oadswell of Australia, Dr. Rendle of F.P.R.L. and Dr. Chalk of Oxford. The School<br />

of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Cambridge can' also claim to be responsible for the first teaching ofTimber<br />

Technology to the Trade with the initiation of evening classes ·given by Mr. Boulton<br />

at The City of London College. Mr. Boulton was later to be responsible for the setting<br />

up of the Institute of Wood Science and the Timber Development Association.<br />

The Cambridge tradition did not die with the closure of the School. Graduates from<br />

Cambridge were to hold high positions in their profession in many lands..Here, in<br />

Britain E. C. Mobbs and M. V. Laurie both of Cambridge were later to become<br />

Professors of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Bangor and Oxford respectively.<br />

7


180 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

the industries it serves. This re-orientation of the work of the Laboratory has been<br />

assisted by an internal re-organisation which took place in 1968. In place of the former<br />

sections there are now seven research groups and an information group, falling in<br />

three Divisions (Structures and Building, Production and Processing, Preservation).<br />

One effect of the re-organisation has been to bring scientists and engineers together<br />

more closely in dealing with subjects in which they have a common interest.<br />

A further rearrangement of Government departments took place in 1970, leading<br />

to the disbandment of the Ministry of Technology and the transfer of the Laboratory<br />

to the newly formed Department of the Environment. This emphasises the important<br />

ties which exist between the Laboratory and the construction industry, which provides<br />

the largest single outlet for wood and wood products. It underlines also the Laboratory's<br />

concern with codes and standards for use and protection of wood, a material whose<br />

performance is very significant in the human environment.<br />

It is not possible in a sh,ort article to list the achievements of the Laboratory. In the<br />

course of over 40 years there have been a number of notable advances, but its main<br />

strength lies in the depth ofinformation that is available on all aspects of the utilisation<br />

ofwood and in the steady progress that has been made in achieving a better understanding<br />

ofthe fundamental properties ofwood, learning more about its technical behaviour,<br />

and developing processes, machinery and materials for its more efficient utilisation. In<br />

this note we have looked backwards and traced briefly the development of the<br />

Laboratory from its foundation to the present time. The Laboratory is not, however, a<br />

backward-looking but a forward-looking organisation and this is well expressed in the<br />

theme of Open Days to be held in 1971-Timber Today and Tomorrow.<br />

Acknowledgement: This paper is published by permission of the Department of the<br />

Environment.


FORESTRY ADVISERS<br />

No 'historical record of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association w()1;1ld ,be<br />

complete without some reference, 'however brief, to the post of <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser.<br />

Originally created 'in 1941 and designated <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser to the Secretary of<br />

State for the Colonies, the title was successively changed to <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser to the<br />

Minister of the Department of Technical Co-operation; to the Minister of Overseas<br />

Development and, finally, to the Minister of the Overseas Development Administra.<br />

tion of the Foreign and <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Office. .'<br />

The connection 'between the <strong>Forestry</strong> Advisers and the Association is not far to<br />

see:k; the first holder of the post, the late W. A. Ro·bertson, had been an editor of<br />

the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal. All holders of the post have been members of the<br />

Governing Council and the Executive Committee and as such played a big part in<br />

framing the destinies of the Associatio·n.<br />

As mentioned, the first 'holder of the post was W. A. RO'bertson, one of ,the last<br />

batch of students to join the Indian Forest Service from Coopers Hill. Retiring<br />

from Burma in 1932, he firstly edited the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal and in 1933 was<br />

appointed Director, F.P.R.L. at Princes Risborough, a post he held until 1945,<br />

during the last four years of which he also undertook the duties of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Adviser to the Secretary of State for the Colonies in an honorary capacity. From<br />

1945 to 1950 he devoted all his energies to the post of Adviser and it was during<br />

these post-war years when he travelled extensIvely that 'he became well known to<br />

mem'bers of the Colonial Forest Service. Retiring on reaching the age limit in<br />

1950, 'he continued as an active member of the Governing' Council until 1963 and<br />

was a regular attender at all meetings of the Association.<br />

The choice of a successor to Robertson was Frank Collier, a member of the<br />

C.F.S. and recently retired as Chief Conservator, Nigeria. Although best known<br />

as a sportsman and naturalist, Collier had made his mark on West African forestry<br />

during his 28 years in Nigeria and if the Indian tradition was to be broken he was<br />

the obvious choice. Collier in turn during 'his six years in office toured widely and<br />

became well kno'wn to officers of :the C.F.S. Ill-health forced him to relinquish the<br />

post earlier than he mig'ht otherwise have done.<br />

The next holder of the post was Christopher Swabey, than whom no one had a<br />

wider kno,wledge of Colonial territories; he had served in four countries and been<br />

head of three services. Like his predecessors 'he toured widely and in addit'ion held<br />

the distinction of being appointed Chairman of the VlIIth <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Conference held in East Africa in 1962. A noteworthy innovation during Swabey's<br />

tenure of office was the Adviser's Newsletter whereby serving officers were kept in<br />

to'uch with developme,nts in other territories. In 1965 he vacated the post to take<br />

over the Directorship of the Commonweatl1h <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau, Oxford, from whic·h<br />

he has recently retired.<br />

On Swabey's relinquishing the post he was succeeded by W. E. M. Logan who<br />

a few years earlier 'had succeeded him as Chief Conservator, Uganda. Logan only<br />

remained in the post a matter of three years, finding world travel and commuting<br />

to London from his home in Bucking'h1amshire conflicted with his farming ambitions.<br />

In 1968 John Wyatt-Smith succeeded Logan as Adviser. Wyatt-Smith had<br />

joined the Malayan Forest Servlice in 1939; apart from a brief spell in Nigeria<br />

1942-44 all his service was in Malaya. He left Malaya in 1963, shortly after<br />

Independe'nce, with the rank of Conservator and as Silvicul:turist at the Forest<br />

Research Institute at Kepong. On leaving Malaya he held an F.A.D. appointment<br />

as Professor of <strong>Forestry</strong> at the newly forme'd Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University<br />

of Ibadan, Nigeria, until succeeding Logan in 1968.<br />

181


182 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Five Advisers in the short space -of thirty years have brought to bear on <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> the traditions and forestry knowledge of the Indian Forest<br />

Service,_ West Africa, the West Indies, East Africa and now Malaysia with its<br />

unique Dipterocarp silviculture.


FORTY-NINTH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING·.:--.]UBILEE YEAR 185<br />

developments within the Association during. the past few years which has givoll·;me<br />

particular satisfaction, it is a< development which should prove of inestimable. value<br />

to the Association during the years ahead. A development which will I hope embrace<br />

not only those in this.country but throughout the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>; .but I am now in<br />

danger of trespassing on the ground to be covered by the Editor/Secretary; I'shall<br />

listen with considerable interest to his views on the future development of the<br />

Association.<br />

As members will be aware, our Patron is Her Majesty the Queen. On such occasions<br />

as a Golden Jubilee it is customary to send Her Majesty a Loyal Message; this I have<br />

done on your behalf, it is quite brief, I will read it to you: (See page 89).<br />

In reply the following gracious message has been received from Her Majesty (See<br />

page 89).<br />

Before closing there remains one brief duty on a rather sad note..Since our meeting<br />

last year death has removed CoL W. F. Chipp from our midst and I think it is<br />

appropriate to pay a brief tribute to his memory. Col. Chipp had a brilliant record in<br />

two World Wars;' to us he was our librarian for twenty-one years. His biography<br />

appeared in a recent copy of the <strong>Review</strong>. To that I can only add a comment from one<br />

of our members. "He was a fine old Warrior, the like of whom we seldom see".<br />

Ladies and Gentlemen, in conclusion I commend to you the future success and<br />

prosperity of the Association.<br />

I now invite the Chairman to present the Annual Report'of the Governing Council.<br />

The Chairman, Sir Arthur Gosling, then presented the annual report of the<br />

Governing Council. As all members had received a printed copy of this report he<br />

contented himself with brief reference to highlights of the year. Of major importance<br />

was the continuing satisfactory financial situation which revealed a· surplus of £774.<br />

The membership position again showed a net increase in membership but there was<br />

considerable scope for improvement. The unfortunate "loss" situation on the Schlich<br />

Memorial Fund had been faced and this investment transferred to a dated stock which<br />

would in due course enable the Fund to recoup some of the loss. The adoption of the<br />

report was moved by Sir Stuart Mallinson, seconded by Dr. H. C. Dawkins.<br />

Election of Honorary Life Members<br />

The Executive Committee had nominated the following members for election by<br />

the Annual General Meeting as Honorary Life Members to mark the occasion of the<br />

Association's Golden Jubilee. The Chairman said a few words about each recipient<br />

of this honour.<br />

Sir Harry Champion<br />

Sir Harry was too well-known to the forestry world to need any introduction. He<br />

had at all times been a keen supporter of the Association and taken a prominent<br />

part in all policy framing.<br />

Mr. J. B. Clements<br />

Mr. Clements was the solve surviving founder member of the Association. Retiring<br />

as ChiefConservator ofForests, Nyasaland, he was now enjoying retirement in Devon.<br />

Mr. H. R. MacMillan<br />

:Mr. MacMillan was the Chairman of the Canadian firm MacMillan BloedelLitnited<br />

and had done a great deal to further the Association's interests in Canada. Prior to<br />

his career in the timber trade Mr. MacMillan had been a forest Officer in British<br />

Columbia.<br />

On the proposal of the Chairman these elections were carried unanimously.<br />

Election of Members, to the Governing Council<br />

The following mem,bers of the Governing Council were re-elected: Abdul Majid<br />

Bin Haji Mohamed Shahid, Sir Harry Champion, Messrs. W. E. M. Logan, ,R. G.


By APPOINTMENT<br />

To HER. MAJESTY THE QUEEN<br />

PRINTERS AND STATIONERS<br />

OXLEY &. SON (WINDSOR) LTD.<br />

2-4 VICtORIA STREETt WINDSOR


192 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

A. L. Poole<br />

of photographs of animals in the wild and compiled under Lindsay Poole's direction.<br />

Intensive development of forestry and forest industries in New Zealand since the<br />

1950 has made oversea inspections by senior forestry officer increasingly necessary


A. L. POOLE 193<br />

and has also created a demand for access to their expertise in manipulating man-made<br />

forests. Lindsay Poole has participated prominently both in weighing up developments<br />

overseas and as a leader in deliberations of international technical aid organisations<br />

in various parts of the world.<br />

As to policy, the Forest Service under Lindsay Poole has followed the recommendation<br />

in his book'<strong>Forestry</strong> in New Zealand:<br />

"Although forestry practice n1ust be flexible enough to be able to adjust to<br />

worthwhile changes, it must not be so susceptible to alteration as to be overthrown<br />

or harmed either by design or by the indirect results of self-interested<br />

action of business and industry."<br />

Perhaps one of the major achievements of Lindsay Poole's era has been the<br />

rationalisation of the Forest Service. He has made forest management, in its broadest<br />

sense of the word, the central theme of the department's organisation. Planning,<br />

including preparation of the forestry planning model, the development of forest<br />

working plans and on a broader scale, regional planning, has received great emphasis..f!<br />

Much weight is now given to the economics of forestry, particularly the economic<br />

analysis of alternatives.<br />

Planting, increased in Entrican's time, has been greatly accelerated in recent years,<br />

backed by an awakened interest in afforestation shown by private companies, local<br />

bodies, private individuals, and general support by the public, which sees forestry<br />

development as one of the main alternatives to over-dependence on farming production.<br />

This has led to an expansion in forestry extension work by the department.<br />

With the increase in planting over the years there has been a parallel rise in the<br />

number of forests being utilised. Leasing of land for afforestation and efficient conversion<br />

provisos for long-term sales of timber from State forests have also been a<br />

feature of this period.<br />

Emphasis has not been solely on managemel1t and planning; greater importance<br />

has also been attached to the role of the Utilisation Development Division and to the<br />

varied work carried out by the Forest Research Institute. For the latter, advisory<br />

.committees including representatives of commercial interests have been established<br />

to assist in determining priorities in research.<br />

Lindsay Poole has directed the Forest Service towards positive steps in recreational<br />

use of forests including the establishment of forest parks, the development of amenity<br />

planting and picnic sites, and especially the adoption of a policy of managing all<br />

State forests on multiple-use principles, a concept now being taken up by large<br />

afforestation companies.<br />

The <strong>Forestry</strong> Development Conference, held in February 1969 to review the role of<br />

forestry and the forest industries and to indicate their potential, must rank as one<br />

of the highlights of Lindsay Poole's career. Of the 176 recommendations referred to<br />

the <strong>Forestry</strong> Development Council-a permanent body arising from the Conference­<br />

105 recommendations have been implemented, 14partiallyimplemented, 3 not accepted,<br />

3 deferred; 51 still under action. These recommendations have set a pattern for important<br />

aspects offorestry in future.<br />

Lindsay Poole, an authority on New Zealand beeches (Nothofagus spp.) is the author<br />

of many scientific papers on botany, ecology, and forestry. He has always been an<br />

eminent proponent of the protection of natural resources, which in New Zealand<br />

context is closely related to proper appreciatiol1 of the need to control introduced<br />

animals that can so seriously deplete protective vegetation.<br />

His wide interests have been recognised by his being elected to the presidency of the<br />

Wellington Branch of the Royal Society of New Zealand, the New Zealand InstItute<br />

of Foresters, the New Zealand Ecological Society, and the Wellington Botanical<br />

Society. In recognition of his services to science in New Zealand he was made a<br />

Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand in 1962.<br />

Retirement for Lindsay Poole will be in name only, for it is unlikely that he will be<br />

content to spend all his time on his principal hobby, golf, for which he once had a 4


194 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

handicap and the basic skills to become a champion. Foresters are rarely able to cut<br />

themselves off from. their work in retirement; Lindsay Poole is to move into a wider<br />

field as'chairman ofthe Soil Conservation and River Control Council, the first forester<br />

to hold this position. This is singular recognition ofhis attributes and ofthe importance<br />

offorestry expertise in the solution of soil and water conservation.<br />

Lindsay Poole was awarded the C.B.E. in the 1971 New Year Honours list for<br />

services to forestry. A fitting climax to an outstanding career.


NOTES AND COMMENTS 205<br />

Canadair aircraft in action.<br />

Pho,to by Canad'ian Courier


210 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

dramatic appeals for assistance in an all-out caIIljpaJign to contain the encroaching<br />

desert Iby crash re-afforestation programmes."<br />

"One of the 'best ways of protecting forests from fires is deliberately to set<br />

them alight. This piece of a'dvice was offered by Dr. C. S. Cree, Chief of the<br />

Timber Supply Econo,mics Branch in the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau of<br />

Canberra. He declared that delibera,te and carefully controlled fires lit in<br />

specific areas of the forest, to burn off 'highly inflanuna:ble un'derbus'h, could<br />

eliminate the danger of raging, uncontrolled fires in the future."<br />

"Mr. R. C. Son.;, Inspector-General of Forests, India, forecast that wood was<br />

going to be as important as grain to humanity in the future. He advocated a<br />

world-wide crash programme within the next decade. He was supported by<br />

delegates who suggeste-d inter alia: the afforestation of new areas, the improvement<br />

of tree species through genetic selection, e",pansion of ,man-made forests,<br />

better fire protection and pest control and improved utilisation."<br />

"In another paper Mr. Soni enlarged on the importance of greater -exploitati:on<br />

of minor forest products."<br />

All the above items are by no means new, they have been aired in one form<br />

or another at earlier W,orld Congresses 'and in our own <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Conferences.<br />

An even -bigger problem is that of converting theory into practice. One<br />

can only hope that the vario·us delegates will be able to convince their respective<br />

G,overnments of the urgency of the pr'oblems.<br />

In addition to purely forestry problems the Committee also touched on various<br />

wildlife problems, in particular the unfortunate aftermath of the persistent hunting<br />

of the larger cats to meet the demands of the fur trade.<br />

Mr. J. S. Sawye'rr, Chief Conservator, Sierra Leo,ne, reported large increases<br />

in the monkey population due to the disappearance of the leopard; in particular<br />

he referred to the grey vervet m-onkey which was seriously menacing farm crops.<br />

Senor Federico B:ascope, Chief of Bolivia's Forest Service, revealed a similar<br />

state of affairs when 'he told the followin'g story:<br />

Eight years ago, 600 people in the village of San Ramo-n, in Beni state, deep in<br />

the Bolivian jungle, died of a strange disease. The p-uzzled Bolivian authorities<br />

appealed to the American Institute for Tropical Diseases in Panama, which sent<br />

a party of doctors and researchers to, San Ramon. The American researchers, who<br />

stayed two years, diagnosed haem,orrhagic fever, an extremely dangerous disease,<br />

which is widespread in small mammals. It had most probably been brought into<br />

the village by the numerous rats, mice and other rodents which infested lit.<br />

Further investigations revealed that the unusual number of rodents both in the<br />

village and in the jungles around it was probably caused b'y a sharp decrease !in<br />

the number of their natural predators such as jaguars, wildcats, pumas and ocelots.<br />

Once a'bundant in the jungles of the region, these felines are now almost extinct<br />

because of constant and ruthless hunting boy the local people who sell the skins to<br />

traders from abroad.<br />

W Id P I d ON MAY 11TH in Rome F.A.O. held its Second Consultation on<br />

or<br />

nU p and World Pulp and Paper Demand, Supply and Trade. Participants<br />

Paper<br />

eman<br />

from 21 countrIes<br />

·<br />

were told that paper and paperbo:ard consumption<br />

may more than do'uble from 123 million tons in 1969 to 285 million tons<br />

in 1985. Assistant Director-Ge-neral of F.A.O.'s <strong>Forestry</strong> Departme,nt, Dr. B. K.<br />

Sleenberg, forecast that this development would afford developing c,ountries opportunities<br />

to expand their industrial base.<br />

Aff tati IN THE SEPTEMBER 1970 issue ·of the <strong>Review</strong> in "News of Mem-<br />

:es d oD bers" we published a brief account of afforestation work around<br />

Khacx:n Khartoum being carried out on the advice of Mr. A. H. Stein.<br />

r oum FA.D. forester. Mr. Stein has now spent ten years in the Sudan<br />

and his activities were recently the subject of a special F.A.O. Press Release, the


3*<br />

NOTES AND COMMENTS 213<br />

A close-up of the New Inertia Gun for Quick Forests.<br />

Photo by Georgia Pacific<br />

will reach an output of 75,000 cubic metres in 1972. This is more than current<br />

total capacity for constructional plywood in Swe'den.<br />

Vanerskog, w'hose 24,000 members own well over two million .acres of pro'ductive<br />

forest land, has grouped its industries under the name of Skogsagarnas Vaner-


OBITUARIES<br />

R. M. Gorrie, I.F.S.<br />

Robert Maclagen Gorrie died at his home in Edinburgh at the age of73 on 21st December<br />

1970. In 1923 he married Sydney Easterbrook and they spent most of their time<br />

together in India. Gorrie joined the Scottish Horse in 1914 when he was 17 and when<br />

the regiment was merged with the Cyclist Corps, unwilling to serve with what was<br />

popularly called the "gas-pipe cavalry", he joined the Gunners: he was commissioned<br />

in 1915 and served in France for much of the Great War.<br />

After the war Gorrie studied forestry at Edinburgh University, obtaining his B.Sc.<br />

in 1922 (D.Sc. in 1930) and in the same year he went to India in the Indian Forest<br />

Service, and was posted to the Punjab. He held charge of divisions which allowed him<br />

to study forests ofevery type in the province and one of these was Hoshiarur where a<br />

serious erosion problem existed, and it may well have been here that in his mind was<br />

sown the seed which grew to make him probably the first person in India to recognise<br />

the dire need for erosion control.<br />

He held several other appointments, such as Lecturer at the Forest College, Dehra<br />

Dun and P.A. to the Inspector General of Forests; during this time he edited the<br />

Indian Forester. But foremost in his mind was the need to tackle erosion; and in 1934,<br />

on a Leverhulme Research Fellowship, Bob Gorrie went to the D.S.A. to learn all<br />

he could on the subject.<br />

Now he was able to go ahead with his own plans for the Punjab, and it was not<br />

long before he was propounding through every medium possible, both the policy and<br />

techniques of erosion control with almost religious fervour. Ignoring the friendly<br />

ridicule of some of his brother officers, he set out to convert both the' administration<br />

and the public to his ideas, and he succeeded.<br />

In the early 1940s he helped to organise a Soil Conservation Circle of which he held<br />

charge as Conservator until 1947. Gorrie stayed on in West Pakistan until 1949<br />

advising the new Government on erosion matters, and then spent three years in Ceylon<br />

drawing up a Soil Erosion Act. Later he went on various assignments, all connected<br />

with erosion, in Turkey, Iran and Iraq, and again to West Pakistan where dams were<br />

being constructed on some of the great rivers. He had done all that was humanly<br />

possible to achieve his aspirations.<br />

He came home and devoted his energies to Scottish affairs, among which were,<br />

editor of The Scottish <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal, and chairman of "The Association for the<br />

Preservation of Rural Scotland".<br />

Bob Gorrie was a man of great singleness of purpose and indefatigable energy,<br />

ruthfully it can be said of him that in his field of activity, he left the world a better<br />

lace than he found it. Heleaves behindhis widow and two sons anda daughter; to them<br />

\ e send our most sincere sympathies.<br />

A.P.F.H.<br />

Ralph Ronald Waterer C.B.E.<br />

Ronald Waterer's many friends will have learnt with profound dismay of his<br />

untimely death on the 8th January 1971. He was killed instantaneously in a motor car<br />

accident: his son-in-law, Lt.-Colonel John Swift, who was driving the car at the time<br />

was also killed.<br />

Born in 1902 he was educated at Clayesmore School and Clare College, Cambridge,<br />

where he studied for a degree in Agriculture. Subsequently he switched over to <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

and was awarded his degree in 1927. At Cambridge his principal recreation was<br />

rowing, and when he moved to Oxford for his post-graduate year at the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute he not only rowed in the Brasenose College 1st Eight, but<br />

gained a place in the University trial eights. Although he failed to win his "blue" he<br />

was elected a member of the Leander Rowing Club.<br />

In 1928 he was appointed to the Colonial Forest Service and was posted to Cyprus<br />

216


OBITUARIES<br />

where he served for some 23 years. He held the post of Conservator of Forests for the<br />

last 15 years of this spell and was created a C.B.E. in 1945. It was probably for his<br />

achievements in Cyprus that he was best known. There he became a legend in his<br />

lifetime. Inspiring a splendid team, he succeeded in eradicating from the forests the<br />

free-ranging goat, an essential, though seemingly impossible, preliminary to the<br />

development which he energetically pursued. By fairness and patient diplomacy he<br />

won round the villagers.<br />

A splendid shot, he was also a keen conservationist of wild life, long before that<br />

attitude became commonplace. In wartime though heavily engaged in war effort in<br />

his civilian capacity he participated in daring exploits in occupied territory.<br />

When the post of Conservator of Forests, Kenya, became vacant at the end of 1950<br />

Ronald was offered and accepted this post, and he arrived in Kenya in March 1951.<br />

His service as Conservator of Forests (subsequently Chief Conservator), Kenya<br />

spanned the period of the Mau Mau rebellion, when normal forest activities were<br />

disrupted over most of the Eastern Conservancy. However he brought a fresh outlook<br />

and new ideas to the forestry problems of Kenya, more particularly in connection<br />

with the construction and expansion of the road system within the Forest Reserves<br />

and in stressing the importance of the wooded mountain slopes for the preservation<br />

of stream flow. The lessons he had learned in Cyprus applied to Kenya almost as<br />

vitally. His best remembered dictum was that the most valuable product of any<br />

forested land was water. He also showed intense interest in the wild life of Kenya, and<br />

as an ex-officio Trustee of the Kenya National Parks he was able to make a useful<br />

contribution towards ensuring the preservation of the country's wild animals.<br />

In 1952 Ronald attended the 6th <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference in Canada,<br />

and in 1957, on the eve of his retirement, he headed the Kenya delegation to the 7th<br />

Conference in Australia and New Zealand, after first undertaking a pre-Conference<br />

tour in Malaya. These three and a half months of touring were not only his swan-song<br />

in his forestry career but were a period when he was seen at his very best. The contribution<br />

which he made to the proceedings, both professionally and socially were very<br />

substantial. In addition he wrote a treatise, with much valuable comment and advice,<br />

on the problems of erosion in the South Island of New Zealand.<br />

Ronald was a man with both charm and tolerance, he inspired devoted support from<br />

those who served under him. But he was also forthright in purpose and having made<br />

up his mind he allowed nothing to deter him from his objective. He had a ready sense<br />

ofthe humorous and his friendly manner inspired confidence and good companionship.<br />

On retirement he was content to take root once more in his home county, taking up<br />

farming and the pursuits of an English country gentleman.<br />

To his widow, Nora, and daughter, Brenda, who lost her husband as well as her<br />

father, all who knew them will wish to extend their deepest sympathy.<br />

C. R. C. Donald<br />

E. T. Honore<br />

G. W. Chapman<br />

Donald McCo11<br />

A 52-year association with the forest products industry came to a close in January<br />

with the passing oflogging pioneer, Don McCo11 at his home in Surrey where he retired<br />

in 1965.<br />

With a degree in forestry from Washington University, Scottish-born Mr. McCo11<br />

joined Bloedel Stewart & Welch in 1919, then became a logging engineer at Union<br />

Bay and Myrtle Point in 1922. Later he was a logging operator for Byle & Groves at<br />

Port Alberni, then joined Alberni Pacific in 1929 as logging foreman.<br />

In 1931 the company was taken over by MacMillan Export and Mr. McCo11 became<br />

logging engineer in charge of construction and development, then logging general<br />

superintendent and logging manager. From 1950 he spent two years as a logging<br />

consultant, then became vice-president of timber and a director ofTahsis Co. until his<br />

retirement.<br />

217


218 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

He was past-president of Pacific J.,ogging Congress and the B.C. Loggers Organisation.<br />

During his 46 years in the industry he developed several logging methods that<br />

are still in use. B·· h C l b· L b F b 1971<br />

rltls 0 um la um erman, e ruary,<br />

J. A. WllSOD, I.F.S.<br />

J. A. Wilson passed away on 3rd May 1971. "Billy" Wilson as he was always known<br />

joined the I.F.S. after graduating from Cambridge in 1922 and was posted to Madras<br />

Presidency. All his career was spent in Madras where he held various territorial and<br />

specialist posts with equal competence. He was at one time senior instructor at the<br />

Madras Forest College, Coimbatore. For several years he was attached to the logging<br />

and sawmilling team organised by American experts to the reciprocal advantage of<br />

both parties. He was a most cheerful companion and always ready to go out of his<br />

way to be helpful. J M M S t<br />

. . . wee.<br />

Gerald Hoyte Hocking<br />

Gerald Hocking's career in forestry was many things, and a story ofreal ahievement.<br />

He was known first to the writer as a quiet, unassuming youth fresh from Wanganui<br />

Collegiate School who began studying for a degree at the Canterbury School of<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> in 1927. Academically well equipped, he took his degree in the minimum four<br />

years; and his farming background made him a top-notch field man with axe or<br />

slasher, compass, chain or horse, the working tools of the junior forester forty years<br />

ago. Later, Hocking was in his day one of the "young Turks" offorestry, who did not<br />

believe-and said so in no uncertain terms-that working as a labourer in a relief<br />

camp at Hanmer Forest was giving himself and the country an adequate return from<br />

his professional training.<br />

Hocking's next step was to the Forest Service Head Office in Wellington where,<br />

still with labourer's status, he was general factotum to the ChiefInspector, C. M. Smith,<br />

for two years. As an earlier incumbent of the same exalted office, one can vouch for<br />

'the educative value of that experience.<br />

Promoted in 1935 to the dizzy heights offorest guard, that "dodoclass" staff group<br />

which was later translated to the foreman-ranger category, Hocking worked in the<br />

Ohakune district until a breakdown in health forced his retirement from the forestry<br />

scene for over five years. Only those who knew him during that period will be aware of<br />

the fortitude, albeit with no great patience, he showed throughout his protracted illness;<br />

nor could one cease to admire the hard work, both physical and intellectual, he later<br />

contributed to the cause of forestry, despite severe and permanent limitations.<br />

Pronounced fit to return to duty in 1943, Hocking spent practically the whole of<br />

his remaining career, stationed at Palmerston North where he became, by unanimous<br />

if unspoken consent, "Mr. Wellington Conservancy". His knowledge of his own<br />

Conservancy, its people, its resources, its potential and its needs was encyclopaedic;<br />

and memorials to Gerald Hocking will long remain standing in truly "permanent<br />

materials"-forests of his own creating.<br />

Probably on the basis that the only way to get an unpopular job done is to "ask a<br />

busy man", Hocking inevitably became editor of the New Zealand Journal of<strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />

holding that post from 1943 to 1951. During that era the forestry profession was almost<br />

clam-like in the literary sense, and his contributions, both in editorial and in editorship,<br />

were outstanding. He was also the New Zealand representative at the British <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held in Canada in 1952, an assignment that could well<br />

have daunted lesser men in his position.<br />

Gerald Hocking retired. from the Forest Service at the end of 1968, and died at<br />

Pahnerston North on 17th September last. The sympathy of all who knew him will<br />

gotohiswidow, June, hersonandtwo daughters. He was a manwho achieved much, inno<br />

easy circumstances, and one who will hold a place of respect and affection-and admiration<br />

yes-in the hearts and minds of his contemporaries and colleagues while<br />

life lasts. D K d<br />

. enne y.


OBITUARIES<br />

Roger Rail<br />

The death in Umtali after a long illness of Roger Rail in October, 1970, at the age<br />

of 47 has come as a shock to his many friends. He was educated in Utntali, Rhodesia,<br />

and after war service in the East studied forestry at Edinburgh, graduating in 1949.<br />

In 1950 he attended the Colonial Forest Officers post-graduate course at Oxford and<br />

was then appointed to the Rhodesian Forest Service. He resigned in 1968 to take charge<br />

of his father's farm.<br />

He retained an active interest in forestry until his illness. He will always be remembered<br />

for the enthusiasm and determination, at times explosive, with which he undertook<br />

his work, but which was always coupled with his generous and kind nature.<br />

Our sympathies are extended to his widow and two children.<br />

A. B. Jeffrey.<br />

Joseph William Gottstein<br />

Bill Gottstein of C.S.I.R., Melbourne met a tragic death in a tree-felling accident<br />

in New Guinea on 25th March 1971. To those who knewhim it is sad, but not strange,<br />

that it s.hould be his destiny to be killed in the forest he loved, while intent on watching<br />

the behaviour oftimber to understand even better the material to which he had devoted<br />

his professional life.<br />

Bill Gottstein commenced his career at the age of 17 with the Queensland Forest<br />

Service as a cadet wood technologist. For 14 years he was engaged in research and<br />

practical assistance to timber producers and users in his State, gaining at the same time<br />

a B.Sc. in chemistry through part-time studies.<br />

By 1943 the Division of Forest Products, C.S.I.R., was actively seeking his services,<br />

and after initial secondment in 1944 he joined C.S.I.R. as a permanent officer in 1945,<br />

starting as second-in-charge ofthe Seasoning Section. In 1954 he was appointed section<br />

leader of Veneer and Gluing and in 1967 of Timber Conversion, a new section formed<br />

by the amalgamation of seasoning, utilisation, and plywood.<br />

During the later years ofhis career, Bill's renown spread beyond Australia and made<br />

him a figure of truly international repute in the field of composite wood. His services<br />

were increasingly sought by international agencies such as the Food and Agriculture<br />

Organisation ofthe United Nations, his counsel was highly appreciated in international<br />

meetings, and his warm smile and easy manner enabled him to communicate readily<br />

across language barriers. His name is mentioned with esteem and affection in many<br />

places he visited all over the world.<br />

Bill Gottstein leaves a widow and a son of fourteen to whom we extend our most<br />

sincere sympathy.<br />

C.S.I.R.O. Neu,'sletter.<br />

Abdul Rahrnan bin Ali<br />

ABDUL RAHMAN BIN ALl, of the Malayan Forest Service, passed away on 24th<br />

December, 1969, at the age of 44 in his ,home' town of Kuantan in Pahang during<br />

a brief ho'liday visi,t. His untimely death has deprived the Malaysian F'orest<br />

Service of a much experienced, hardw'orking, conscientious and dedicated officer.<br />

He was a ,pillar ,of strength in the service and his death is indee·d a severe blow<br />

to the service which is still suffering from a deart'h of experienced senior officers.<br />

A'b'dul Rahman was first .appointed to the' Forest Department in 1947 as a<br />

Timber Inspector. He earned rapid promotio'ns and at the time of his death he<br />

was ,officiating as State Forest Officer of the 'State of Selangor. But for his<br />

untimely demise he wo,uld 'have in all probability go,ne on to 'become the head of<br />

the Fe'deral Forest Departme'nt.<br />

He took a very active and useful part in various departmental activitlies and<br />

his co,ntri'butio'n to West Malaysian forestry was very notable. One will see the<br />

indelible mark of his eff'orts in almost any field 'of dep,artmental actiVlity one<br />

may choose to examine.<br />

219


220 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

In spite of the he'avy burden of 'his duties, Abdul Ra'hm'an found time to take<br />

an active part in sports and social activities. He was noted for his c'heerful<br />

demeanour and was very much a favourite among 'his fellow officers and subordinates<br />

and among his wide circle 'of friends as well. His untimely dem;ise has left a<br />

profound vacuum which will particularly be felt by 'his wife and children, to<br />

whom we extend our deepest sympathies.<br />

K. D. Menon.


AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH<br />

CANADA<br />

Canada's Forest Products exports to the United Kingdom. By G. H. Manning*<br />

In conjunction with a larger study of Canada's supply-demand relationships in<br />

forest products, the Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service has prepared an assessment of the<br />

future export ttade in forest products with the United Kingdom. It is felt that the<br />

results may be ofsome interest to other members of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>.<br />

The United Kingdom is presently Canada's second most important market for<br />

forest products. Sales to the United Kingdom approached $220 million in 1968t.<br />

However, the United Kingdom market for forest products appears to be relatively<br />

stable, and shows few signs of spectacular increases in demand. The United Kingdom<br />

by the turn of the century will, therefore, have been surpassed by Japan in importance<br />

as a market for Canadian forest products.<br />

Lumber, veneer and plywood, woodpulp and newsprint are Canada's major exports<br />

to the United Kingdom. On the basis of importance in world markets, however,<br />

the United Kingdom is .presently Canada's most important customer for veneer<br />

andplywood(40 percent), wrapping paper (76 percent), and paperboard (71 percent)t.<br />

The United Kingdom has been dependent on imports to supply its forest products<br />

requirements for quite some time. MacGreggor (1953) has stated that the proportion<br />

of home-grown softwoods is about five per cent, and of hardwoods 30 to 50 per cent.<br />

Projections of production of home-grown wood by Hummel and Grayson (1969)<br />

indicate that by 1980, about 5.7 million m 3 of roundwood will be available in the<br />

United Kingdom, and by 2000 8.9 million m 3 • Hardwoods will constitute a constant<br />

1.5 million 111 3 • These quantities of roundwood would result in production of 1.9<br />

million metric tons ofwood fibre products and 2 million m 3 ofsawnwood from domestic<br />

raw material by 2000; which would constitute somewhat less than 9 per cent of requirements<br />

as Grayson (1969) predicts total imports of forest products (roundwood<br />

equivalents) at 90 per cent of total requirements in 1957 and 89 per cent in 1980.<br />

PROJECTIONS<br />

Data concerning past and present Canadian exports of forest products to the<br />

United Kingdom, and projections of exports in 1980 and 2000 may be found in<br />

Table 1. Four products constitute the bulk of Canada's forest products exports to<br />

the United Kingdom: lumber, plywood, newsprint, and woodpulp.<br />

Lumber: In 1966, the United Kingdom imported 8.76 million m 3 of lumber. Canada<br />

provided 1.86 million m 3 of these imports, or 21 per cent. Canadian lumber exports<br />

to the United Kingdom have increased at an average of 6.2 per cent annually since<br />

1950, though the past .several years have shown a decline. Given past trends, and<br />

future expectations of the United Kingdom's economy, and in spite of the recent<br />

short-term decline, it is estimated that exports of lumber to this destination will<br />

reach 2.19 million m 3 by 1980, and 2.73 million m S by 2000, a somewhat lower rate<br />

of increase than the historic trend.<br />

Plywood: Canadian exports of plywood to the United Kingdom have increased<br />

rapidly since 1950, up to 225 thousand m S in 1966 from 0.05 thousand m s • Ninetyeight<br />

per cent of this is softwood plywood from British Columbia. It is expected that<br />

exports of plywood to the United Kingdom from Canada will reach 481 thousand InS<br />

by 1980 and 841 thousand m s by 2000, an annual growth rate of 3.6 per cent.<br />

Newsprint: Newsprint is Canada's largest export to the United Kingdom. In 1966,<br />

Canada supplied 348 thousand metric tons of the United Kingdom's total consumption<br />

of 1,388 thousand metric tons. Ray (1965) has estimated newsprint re-<br />

lic Forest Economics Research Institute, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service, Department of the<br />

Environment, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.<br />

t Dominion Bureau of Statistics. Exports by Commodities. D.B.S. Cat. No. 65-004.<br />

t Information courtesy of the Dominion Bureau of Statistics.<br />

221


AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 223<br />

have to be radical changes in the attitude-and hence training-of the forester of the<br />

future if he was to fulfil his correct role in social and environmental forestry.<br />

The wave of well-meaning but often uninformed emotion about the quality of the<br />

environment and about that imprecise term "conservation" would doubtless pass.<br />

But informed, responsible concern based on scientifically established facts would<br />

endure and would be backed by a determination that never again would<br />

private enterprise, public apathy, or official mis-management be allowed to devalue or<br />

to destroy the physical environment in which we have to live.<br />

No section of the community exhibited this determination more uncompromisingly<br />

than young people, who would be the leaders of tomorrow and hence the arbiters of<br />

future environmental policy. Because of this, and the hope that foresters would<br />

play a key role in moulding future environmental policy, youth were by far the most<br />

important peopie in forestry.<br />

Forest service-Industry Exchange Suggestion<br />

A proposal for a temporary exchange ofpersonnel between Government and industry<br />

was put forward by New Zealand's Director-General of Forests, Mr. A. P. Thomson,<br />

at the annual general meeting of the New Zealand Institute ofForesters. Mr. Thomson<br />

commented:<br />

"A forester today must have some marketing expertise. I find it difficult to see<br />

how this skill can be imparted by formal training; it seems to me it can come<br />

through experience only.<br />

"I wonder therefore whether New Zealand should not move towards what has<br />

been quite common practice in the United States: the temporary exchange of<br />

personnel between Government and industry. I realise all the difficulties attendant<br />

upon such a suggestion but I believe that if something could be achieved along<br />

these lines it would be very good for the Forest Service, and it might do no harm<br />

to industry ..."<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

A Statement Of<strong>Forestry</strong> Policy For Great Britain<br />

Prepared by The Society ofForesters o/Great Britain, March 1971.<br />

The Elements ofForest Policy<br />

1. Forest Policy is an essential and integral part of the national policy needed to<br />

ensure that our land is used to best advantage. The large and increasing population,<br />

which is preponderately urbanised, and the restricted land area make a<br />

consistent Forest Policy essential.<br />

Land allocated to forestry should be used to attain two main objects, viz:<br />

a) Production of wood and wood-products at the highest level to meet the<br />

demands of industry and reduce our reliance on imports.<br />

b) Provision of shelter, protection of water supplies, conservatiol1 of game<br />

and wild life, preservation and creation ofamenity and provision ofrecreational<br />

areas for our people.<br />

Normally more than one of these objects can simultaneously be achieved within<br />

an area of forest. In particular cases one may be preponderant and impose some<br />

restrictions on the others; but adjustments can usually be made to ensure that<br />

other uses can continue to an appreciable extent. The Forest Policy should therefore<br />

envisage integrated forest practice, often termed "multiple-use forestry".<br />

2. The Forest Policy cannot be considered in isolation but must be related to policies<br />

of land use. Farming, both arable and stock-raising, occupies the greatest land<br />

area; but urban and industrial use of the land and its use for recreation of all<br />

kinds are rapidly increasing. There is no standard formula by which either the<br />

optimum or miniwn area of forested land needed for Great Britain can be determined,<br />

but at present the proportion allocated to forestry is much lower than in<br />

most other developed countries of the temperate zone.


224 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

3. The first statement of Forest Policy for this country aimed at the provision of an<br />

essential reserve of wood to sustain the nation in time of war or blockade; ,this<br />

has been superseded and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners' general duty (as stated in<br />

the <strong>Forestry</strong> Act of 1967) now includes that of "promoting the establishment<br />

and maintenance in Great Britain of adequate reserves of growing trees". The<br />

Society of Foresters of Great Britain considers that the word "reserves" is unsuitable<br />

as it implies a stock which can be drawn on only in an emergency. The<br />

present and future needs are firstly to secure an increasing flow of home-produced<br />

forest products; and secondly to attain in greater measure the benefits listed in<br />

paragraph 1 (b) above. To meet these needs it will be necessary to establish and<br />

maintain additional areas of forests and woodlands.<br />

4. The Society of Foresters considers that the word "adequate" must also be defined.<br />

For wood products "adequate" supplies might be expressed as a proportion of the<br />

projected total consumption of wood in Great Britain; but determination of the<br />

proportion is still required. The essential point is that the land of this country<br />

should be used to best advantage and the Forest Policy must ensure that the<br />

objects of management for land allocated to the growing of trees are clearly<br />

defined, goals are set and the criteria by which the results are to be judged are<br />

specified. A figure of at least 7!- million acres (3 million hectares) of forest is<br />

suggested as a first target and this represents 15 per cent of the total land area of<br />

Great Britain.<br />

5. A feature of recent years has been the conviction, repeatedly stressed by official<br />

committees, that land-use surveys should precede further development of rural<br />

areas. Part III of the Agriculture Act 1967 includes provisions for surveys of this<br />

kind and for the formation of Rural Development Boards. Land-use surveys<br />

can provide the basic information for decisions about the extent and location of<br />

forests on which interim planning can be based. They must not be regarded as<br />

absolute statements of the value or capability of land, because as forestry and<br />

agricultural techniques advance and economic and social circumstances change,<br />

the decisions made by foresters, farmers and other users of the land will alter.<br />

However, on the basis of land-use surveys, forestry development areas in which<br />

timber production could be the primary land-use can be defined. Account should<br />

be taken ofexisting or potential sites for locating wood-using industries and housing<br />

forestry workers. <strong>Forestry</strong> development areas have great potential value for the<br />

development of the remoter rural areas of Britain and the Forest Policy should<br />

encourage their formation. Also, land-use surveys will almost certainly reveal<br />

smaller areas in primarily agricultural or even suburban and urban areas where<br />

the growing of trees is the most suitable use of land, and forestry development<br />

here should also be vigorously encouraged.<br />

6. Further, to ensure that the forest resources of Great Britain are employed to best<br />

advantage, the Forest Policy should require that all forests and woodlands are<br />

properly managed to achieve defined objects. This requirement applies as much to<br />

those in which one or other of the second group of objects given in paragraph 1 is<br />

preponderant as to those intended primarily for the production of wood. Forests<br />

and woodlands should be managed with a view to their perpetuation. A harvested<br />

crop oftrees must be regenerated in situ or else replaced by an equivalent or better<br />

crop elsewhere. Amenity or recreational woodlands should not be allowed to<br />

collapse with the passage of time nor be destroyed by excessive use; their regeneration<br />

should be undertaken, and where necessary their use regulated to<br />

ensure this.<br />

7. The Forest Policy must be framed for the whole of Britain and to meet the needs<br />

of the nation by providing facilities or incentives to those engaged or interested<br />

in forestry namely:<br />

a) the public'forest enterprise managed by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission;<br />

b) forestry activities of other public authorities;


AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 225<br />

c) the private forests and woodlands owned by landed proprietors and companies<br />

of various kinds;<br />

d) the industry utilising home-produced wood, comprising the timber trade, the<br />

paper and board industry and other industrial plants processing home-produced<br />

wood;<br />

e) the interests concerned with the management of forests for shelter, conservation<br />

of water, game and wildlife and for recreation and amenity.<br />

8. The Forest Policyfor Great Britain to be pursued by Government should, following<br />

the lines laid down in paragraphs 1 to 7, ensure:<br />

a) That the supplies of growing trees are rising steadily and rapidly to meet the<br />

needs both of developing industry and of import substitution as well as providing<br />

for timber requirements that might arise in a national emergency;<br />

and that land suitable for forestry is being put to this use by the public and<br />

private sectors.<br />

b) That the public forest enterprise has adequate funds for its steady expansion.<br />

c) That the private sector is provided with incentives to maintain and manage its<br />

existing forest land and to extend this wherever suitable.<br />

d) That the industries based on home-produced wood are in balance with the<br />

production of wood; and that industrial development does not outstrip nor<br />

lag behind supplies, both on national and regional scales.<br />

e) That the marketing of home-produced wood is efficient so that the producer<br />

can find a reasonable sale for his produce and the industrial consumer a<br />

regular supply of raw material.<br />

f) That there is continuing research into the factors affecting tree growth and<br />

regeneration of trees; the production, harvesting, marketing and utilisation<br />

of home-produced wood; and the protective and social roles of trees, forests<br />

and woodlands. This research should have as its object an increase in the<br />

value of forestry to the nation.<br />

g) That education in forestry and ancillary subjects is available at professional,<br />

supervisory, industrial and craft levels to ensure that a skilled work force of<br />

sufficient size can be maintained, and that facilities for further education are<br />

provided so that those who enter can rise to higher levels.<br />

h) That a balance is maintained between the commercial objects of public and<br />

private forests and woodlands, their recreational use by the public, the creation<br />

and maintenance of amenity, the protection of water supplies and the conservation<br />

of wildlife.<br />

i) That in the education of the public, including the formal education of the<br />

young, forestry is adequately covered as a method of land use and a factor in<br />

the environment.<br />

The Implementation of Forest Policy<br />

The Forest Authority<br />

9. A Forest Authority is required to advise Government and the Ministers concerned<br />

on the general position of forestry and especially on matters concerning<br />

theprivate andindustrial sectors. The ForestAuthority shouldalso control the operation<br />

of all Acts and Instruments relating to these sectors, be responsible for<br />

finance, research and the collection of statistics about all aspects -of forestry and<br />

advice on the provision of education. The <strong>Forestry</strong> COl11n1issioners have been in<br />

the past and are at present the Government's Forest Authority for this purpose,<br />

though they are also charged with the control and management of the public<br />

forest enterprise. The Society of Foresters recol11n1ends that this dual role be<br />

continued so that the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners remain both the Forest Authority<br />

and the body responsible for the public forest enterprise.<br />

10. It should be the recognised duty of the Forest Authority to radvise Government<br />

on how the Forest Policy is being implemented and on any 'changes required in<br />

the economic, industrial, social and strategic aspects of forest policy.


226 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

The Public Forest Enterprise<br />

11. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners as managers of the public forest enterprise stated<br />

their policy in 1964 in the following terms:<br />

a) "To increase the production of wood as a raw material for industry by extending<br />

the area of their forest at a steady rate, in accordance with sound<br />

land use; and by making each forest as productive as possible.<br />

b) Within the limits set by their other objectives to manage the forest estate as<br />

profitably as possible.<br />

c) To provide employment in rural areas, especially those most affected by<br />

depopulation and in so doing to maintain a skilled labour force.<br />

d) To give due attention to the aesthetic and protective roles of the forest and<br />

to encourage open air recreation."<br />

They further propose in their management:<br />

e) "To help in maintaining an efficient home-timber trade.<br />

f) To foster industrial and social development ancillary to forestry.<br />

g) To encourage the orderly development of ,private forestry and specifically<br />

to assist in creating conditions in which produce from private as well as<br />

Commission forests can be marketed to best advantage."<br />

The Society of Foresters supports this statement of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners<br />

policy for the public forest enterprise. They consider, however,that its scope should<br />

be widened, making it the duty of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission to undertake development<br />

in conjunction with national and local authorities and with landowners<br />

with the object of forming and maintaining new forests having important<br />

land or water resource or recreational objects in which timber production can<br />

nevertheless be substantial.<br />

Other Public <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

12. The extent of this at present is small, being confined to some Water Authorities,<br />

Local Authorities and such bodies as the National Trusts and Nature Conservancy.<br />

But increased involvement in forestry by Local Authorities is certain to result from<br />

their planning powers, particularly in respect of derelict land and the imposition<br />

of Tree Preservation Orders. The establishment, care and regeneration of woodlands<br />

for amenity is as much a part of forestry as the growing of trees for wood.<br />

The negative Tree Preservation Orders should eventually be replaced by more<br />

positive instruments of policy. Local Authorities should have adequate qualified<br />

staff to enable them to perform their functions efficiently. The development of<br />

local public forestry should therefore lie within the scope of the Forest Authority<br />

as the advisory body both to Government and to the local, regional and other<br />

bodies concerned<br />

The Private Sector of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

13. Both the public and private sectors of forestry produce goods and services for the<br />

same market which is potentially so large that there is no danger ofoverproduction<br />

by either sector. The extension of the forest area in private ownership on suitable<br />

land and its proper management should be encouraged. This is especially the case<br />

as private forestry is better able to undertake the maintenance and management<br />

of small areas of woodland. Many private landowners with large holdings have<br />

successfully integrated forestry, farming and sporting interests in the past and<br />

added substantially to the amenity of the countryside. Many more owners are<br />

extending their forests with the assistance of the co-operative organisations, while<br />

the newer forestry development and management companies provide an influx of<br />

fresh capital and ideas, a new source of management and marketing expertise, and<br />

a stake in the land and forestry for more people.<br />

14. The small woodlands of Great Britain are a special case as they contain a high<br />

proportion of the growing stock of. broadleaved trees; they add greatly to the<br />

amenity of the countryside and they provide a means of conserving game and


AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 227<br />

wildlife, often in the most highly populated parts of Great Britain. They supply a<br />

significant proportion of the national consumption of hardwoods and could<br />

contribute even more if all were fully and properly managed. But n1any small<br />

woodlands are becoming derelict and attention should be given to the problems of<br />

managing them and grants should be revised to encourage their better management<br />

and maintenance.<br />

15. The present relatively vigorous stateof theprivatesector offorestry is due in part to<br />

the tax incentives and grants available for planting and managing forests. The<br />

national benefit obtained is much greater than the cost to the nation. For the foreseeable<br />

future Government must continue to provide such incentives for the maintenance<br />

of the private sector of forestry; and the Forest Authority should be<br />

consulted by the fiscal authorities on any proposed changes in the tax structure<br />

which affect forestry operations or holdings.<br />

16. The justification of any Government grant or tax incentive is the long-term<br />

interest of the nation. Forests and woodlands established with their help must be<br />

properly managed and perpetuated. The importance of the Dedication and<br />

Approved Woodland Schemes is illustrated by the inclusion within them of more<br />

than one million acres of forest land. The Society of Foresters considers that the<br />

main object of the Dedication Scheme should continue to be to secure the longterm<br />

dedication of land to efficient forestry.,<br />

17. It is essential for the wellbeing of a forest or woodland that it is properly managed<br />

and that operations take place at or near the time prescribed and are properly and<br />

skilfully executed. When grants have been made for the establishment or maintenance<br />

of forests and woodlands in which subsequent management has been<br />

unsatisfactory the recovery of such grant is justified. Adequately qualified men<br />

possessing recognised forestry qualifications should be employed and the term<br />

"skilled supervision" in the present regulations should be more closely defined and<br />

enforced.<br />

18. On the Continent the farmers' woodlots provide a significant part of the national<br />

production of wood. But in Great Britain although farming and forestry are being<br />

integrated to their mutual benefit in some areas there is little sign that such<br />

integration will develop further. This is almost certainly due to the prevalence of<br />

the landlord-and-tenant system and the conditions of tenancy being such that it is<br />

little or no advantage to either party to adjust the current land use to the best<br />

national advantage; nor can afforestation be assisted by outside finance under these<br />

conditions. The extent to which this prevents proper use of land suitable for<br />

forestry warrants examination of the problem by the Forest Authority with a view<br />

to advising Government on how this difficulty might be overcome.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> and the Public.<br />

19. With the increasing use of the countryside by the urban population the last two<br />

items of general policy set out in paragraph 8 should become a major pre-occupation<br />

of the Forest Authority within the next decade. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission has<br />

created Forest Parks, camping and caravan sites, nature trails and walks, but<br />

already the most favoured and vulnerable areas are in danger of over-use. A wider<br />

expansion of these facilities would reduce pressure on the most popular areas; but<br />

the numbers of visitors will continue to increase, leading perhaps to restriction on<br />

access and a code of permissible use. The pressure for access can be expected to<br />

extend to the woodlands of the private sector and the Society of Foresters considers<br />

that suitable grants should be made available to encourage owners to<br />

provide facilities for access to their woodlands.<br />

4


RESEARCH NOTES 237<br />

It is hoped that individual technical reports will be prepared for publication locally<br />

and that a combined analysis and report will be issued from Oxford later.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BURLEY, J. and COOLING, E. N. G. 1971. Status ofthe C.F.I. international provenance trial of<br />

Pinus merkusii Jungh.. and de Vriese, September, 1970. Pap.. Symp.. "Selection and improvement<br />

of tropical conifers", Wkg. Gp. Breeding Tropical and Sub-tropical Species, 15th<br />

I.U.F.R.O. Congr., Gainesville, Florida, 5 pp.<br />

LAMB, A. F. A. (1968). Cedrela odorata. Fast Growing Timber Trees of the Lowland Tropics<br />

No. 2. <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, Oxford. 46 pp.<br />

TURNBULL, J. W., and BURLEY, J. (1971). Status of the F.A.O./F.R.I./C.F.I. international<br />

provenance trial ofPinus kesiya. Royle ex Gordon at December, 1970. Pap. Symp. "Selection<br />

and improvement of tropical conifers", Wkg. Gp. Breeding Tropical and Sub-tropical<br />

Species, 15th I.U.F.R.O. Congr., GainesviIle, Florida. 5 pp.


240 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

factors affecting wood production and the genetic variation ,of these factors;<br />

examining the real possibilities of increasing dry matter production 'by bre.eding<br />

for s'pecific physiological features.<br />

It was also indicated that 'intensive management with its trend to monoculture<br />

of either native or exotic species and uniformity of treatments, may produce crops<br />

which are vulnerable to disease or insect attack. Such damage may be sudden<br />

and catastrophic 'but lits probability can Ibe reduced by research into: pest biology<br />

in a variety of forest situations, a field in which there are many opportunities for<br />

international co·'operation.<br />

There is huge scope for research into work systems and mechanisation in order<br />

to reduce inp'uts of wo'rk and money, and many such projects were discussed.<br />

Two very exciting developments in technology which were examined were firstly<br />

the a'pplication of computers to storage and retrieval of forestry information, and<br />

secondly the application of remote sensing techniques to the study of site and<br />

crop features-particularly those using multispectral and linescan ph,oto,grap,hy<br />

both from the ground and from the air. B·oth techniques hold great promise and<br />

their application to forestry research should ,be integrated internatio'nally through<br />

I.D.F.R.O.<br />

An excellent new feature of I.D.F.R.O'. has been the introduction of its Scientific<br />

Ac'hievement Awards for outstanding contributions to knowledge in forestry. The<br />

first five Gold Medals under this scheme were presented by the President, George<br />

Jemison, during the Gainesville Congress.<br />

'The President elect is Professor Ivar Samset and the 16th Congress will take place<br />

in his native Norway in 1976.


242 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

cultivars which 'have arisen tin nurseries, particularly in this co,untry and in<br />

Holland.<br />

The 1970 Conference<br />

The Conferen,ce was opene'd promptly at 1.45 p.m. ,on 5th October by Lord<br />

Aberconway. This was f'ollowed by three lectures, European and Asiatic Conifers<br />

(A. F. Mitchell), American Conifers (R. F. Wood), and The Sele:ction and Breeding<br />

of ,Conifers (R. Faulkner). The Old Hall had a series ,of displays by the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Commlissio'n (seed testing, nurse'ry practice, provenance and gro,wth of 'big specimens),<br />

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (taxonomy of conifers), Forest Products<br />

Research Laboratories (coniferous timbers), the Nature Conservancy (stud:y of<br />

Scots pine), photographs of natural stands in NW. America (B. Mulligan), and<br />

drawings of rare co'nife:rs (Mrs. C. D,arter).<br />

In the New Hall was ,an astonis'hing array of plants of hundre·ds of species and<br />

more 'hundre·ds of cultivars mounted by Mr. Hillier with help fro,m the' Royal<br />

Parks, Windsor. This was designed as six islands, three each side of a wide central<br />

space, each dominated by a fine tree 'of the native Scots pine .from Windsor Forest.<br />

Around th,e walls ,of the hall was a display of foliage of 220 sp'e,cies of 'conifer,<br />

mostly with cones from trees grown on many estates througho,ut the British Isles.<br />

The unprecede'nte'd a'bundance of fruit in 1970 was neatly timed for this C'onference<br />

and many cones were presented w'hich have scarcely been seen before in this<br />

country.<br />

On Tuesday there were lectures ·on Conifers and Nature Conservation (J. N.<br />

Jeffers), T'he Recreational Use of Conifer Woodland (Dr. W. E. S. Mutch),<br />

Conifers fo'r Dec,orative Planting (E. E. Kemp), an'd Pests and Diseases of Conifers<br />

(Dr. M. Crooke and J. S,. Murray). On Wednesday there was a full-day excursion<br />

to Bedgebury National Pinetum and the gardens at Wake:hurst Place. On Thursday<br />

morning there were lectures-the Industrial Use of Coniferous Wo'od (T. A.<br />

Oxley), Conifers in Commercial <strong>Forestry</strong> (D. Seal), and a closing address by Sir<br />

Giles LO'der, Bt. A glorious sunny afternoon was spent at Wisley Garden. Friday<br />

was spent visiting the pineta at Dropmore and Windsor Great Park. On Saturday<br />

the Conference visited Messrs. Hlilliers ,at Jermyns Lane to see a huge assemblage<br />

of trees and a demonstration of propagation of con/jfers by Mr. Humphrey.


COOPERS HILL<br />

By E. W. MARCH<br />

IN HIS ADDRESS at the Annual General Meeting in April our President made reference<br />

to the Royal Indian Engineering College, better known as Coopers Hill, and its<br />

traditions. The College was founded one hundred years ago at the request of the<br />

India Office to provide qualified engineers and telegraphists for service in India. A<br />

forestry section was added in 1886 to provide home training for foresters wishing to<br />

enter the Imperial Forest Service in India, a function which it filled most efficiently<br />

until its closure in 1906.<br />

Many ex-Coopers Hill men were involved in the founding of the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Association, including H. R. Blandford, Editor/Secretary 1939-1952; it is thereforeall<br />

the more surprising that over the years there has been very little mention of Coopers<br />

Hill in the <strong>Review</strong> other than obituaries mentioning "he was trained at Coopers Hill."<br />

In the Association's library are bound copies of the Coopers Hill Magazine, a lively<br />

little publication published six or eight times a year at a cost of three shillings a year<br />

including postage. In this centenary year of the founding of the College it is felt that a<br />

brief "write up" of what is in effect a bygone era may prove ofinterest.<br />

The organiser of the College and its first President was Lt.-Col. Chesney, R.E.<br />

(later General Sir George Chesney). In those early days the staffwas mainly drawn from<br />

retired Sapper officers. As the years passed and with the introduction of the forestry<br />

course the teaching staff began to take on an academic rather than a military mantle.<br />

Whatever the staff and whatever the standard of education the fact remains that the<br />

College produced a series of officers who were for many years to provide the senior<br />

cadre of the Indian P.W.D. and <strong>Forestry</strong> Service. We cannot speak for the P.W.D.<br />

section but the record of the I.F.S. men speaks for itself.<br />

Turning to the students, what manner of men were they and what was their outlook<br />

on life? Mainly from the leading public schools their gospel was a simple one: loyalty<br />

to the Crown, to their country, to their alma mater and a firm belief in the British<br />

presence in India. Their other qualities will be apparent from the various references<br />

to their activities as extracted from the Coopers Hill Magazine.<br />

No account of Coopers Hill would be complete without reference to its sporting<br />

activities. In an average year the College had slightly over one hundred students in<br />

residence yet this small number ran two Rugger XVs, one Soccer XI, two eights on the<br />

river, and still found time for golf, tennis and billiards, not forgetting cricket and<br />

tennis in the summer. It was on the Rugger field that the College really distinguished<br />

itself, its opponents included Oxford University, Harlequins, Richmond, London<br />

Welsh, London Scottish and the leading London Hospital teams. During their short<br />

existence they produced no less than fourteen internationals in this field of sport.<br />

According to the Sporting Life at one time "the College had certainly the strongest<br />

side ill the South of England and was probably the strongest club in the country."<br />

The record for the period of its existence was:-<br />

Matches played 491 Matches lost 155<br />

Matches won 268 Matches drawn 68<br />

Whilst on the subject of Rugby football how many present day enthusiasts are<br />

aware of the origin of the Calcutta Cup? In the early days of the College a cup was<br />

subscribed for and sent to India for annual competition by the three Presidencies,<br />

Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. This competition was not a success as in those days the<br />

climate was considered hardly favourable for Rugby football and after a very short<br />

time the series was discontinued. The cup was then returned to this country and presented<br />

as a trophy to be awarded to the winner of the Annual England-Scotland International<br />

match, which it is to this day.<br />

In addition to studies and sport, social activities were a regular feature of the college<br />

year. An annual Bal Masque was held every November and judging by the reports was<br />

popular and well patronised. Regular monthly dinners were held at the Criterion<br />

243


244 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Restaurant, Piccadilly:- the cost, 3/6 per head exclusive of wines. A college concert at<br />

the end of the autumn term was another regular feature of the social curriculum.<br />

Prize giving provided yet a further regular social event. Wherever they went overseas<br />

Coopers Hill men maintained their gregarious habits, there are reports of annual<br />

dinners at the Bombay Yacht Club; the Sind Club, Karachi; in Calcutta; in Maymyo,<br />

the Burma Hill Station, and Shepheards Hotel, Cairo.<br />

A feature ofthe Coopers Hill Magazine which makes any present day editor envious<br />

is the regularity with which past members kept the editor well supplied with Blackwoodtype<br />

articles, both on the nature of their duties and the lighter side of life. Stories of<br />

Shikar were regularly received; in 1900 an article from R. S. Pearson (later Sir Raif<br />

Pearson of F.P.R.L.) contains the following item to excite the imagination of would-be<br />

sportsmen:<br />

"I have just heard that another of my 'tie-ups' has been killed and hope to get<br />

another tiger today. I am waiting for news from another direction and if there<br />

should be two kills, as is likely, I shall try a 'beat' in one place and a 'sit up' in<br />

another. My camp tomorrow is in a place where a tiger roams about so I may get<br />

a chance again there. You see there are plenty of tigers to spare."<br />

In the same year W. Sullivan, P.W.D. gives an excellent account of a Kadir Cup<br />

Meet. This we hope to publish in full in a subsequent number of the <strong>Review</strong>. Another<br />

item with a certain amount of historic interest is an account of wild elephant catching<br />

in Burma by the kheddah method; the author-another P.W.D. officer, J. E. Dallas.<br />

Accounts of adventures with bison, leopards and other big game were a regular<br />

feature of the magazine.<br />

As is only to be expected in a College magazine where all students have one end in<br />

view; conditions of service are frequently discussed; salary scales, pension rights and<br />

furlough privileges are much to the fore. Looking back it is obvious that bit by bit<br />

concessions were wrung out of the Secretary of State for India but the editorial edict<br />

invariably was "we do not expect to find the terms received with much gratitude."<br />

The serving officer of today in receipt of so many passage concessions and baggage<br />

allowances will be astounded to learn that the Coopers Hill man going to India after<br />

his initial voyage was not given any further passage allowances. The stories of officers<br />

serving twenty or more years without home leave were not old-timer inventions. Many<br />

officers were just not able to save up their passage money and settled for spells ofleave in<br />

one of the hill stations. W. S. Schlich is on record as having only taken one home leave<br />

during his 19 years in India. In 1900 however, the Secretary of State most graciously<br />

agreed that for the first three months ofan overseas furlough an officer should be on full<br />

pay in order to enable him to meet the cost ofhis passage.<br />

A rather gloomy note is struck by the regularity of obituary notices of young officers<br />

within the first two years of their service. The recorded causes of death were malaria,<br />

cholera, enteric and heat-stroke. For those surviving the vital first two years the next<br />

hurdle appeared to be the middle forties at which age quite a number of in-service<br />

deaths are recorded. Assuming he survived those vital ages the Indian forest, or other<br />

service, officer could well expect to become an octogenarian or possibly a nonagenarian<br />

as shown in the obituary notices in the <strong>Review</strong>:- E. P. Stebbing 91, A. J. Gibson 94,<br />

and L. S. Osmaston 99 to mention but a few examples of longevity. As far as we are<br />

aware the sole surviving Coopers Hill forester is A. E. Osmaston still hale and hearty<br />

in his 87th year living in retirement in Sussex.<br />

Not all Coopers Hill men went to India, in later years many found their way to<br />

Egypt and the Sudan. In the final few years mention is also made oftransfers to Malaya<br />

and Uganda. Scattered throughout the magazine are interesting scraps of what was to<br />

become forest history. It was in 1902 that A. M. Bum-Murdoch was transferred to<br />

Malaya to set up a forest Department there. The establishment of organised forestry in<br />

the Sudan in 1900 is recorded; likewise the beginnings of the "man made" forests of<br />

SouthAfrica, then Cape Colony. The names ofthose who were to become famous in the<br />

forestry world in later years are scattered through the pages of the magazine; T. S.


THE FUTURE OF TIMBER IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY 249<br />

and producer in ensuring the minimum variety of sizes, etc. being used'in the<br />

production of a 'component. Th'ere is considerable scope for economies here.<br />

Generally, unless we do gain 'be·nefits in this way dim.ensional co-ordination can<br />

only increase the cost of timber co,mpo·nents. It is inevitable that more material<br />

is consumed since there are greater limitations on the sizes whic'h can be used. It<br />

is essential therefore that savings in production costs offset increased use of<br />

materials. This may be more difficult with timber than many other materials since<br />

the actual mate·rials used frequently account for up to 60 per cent of the total cost<br />

of the product whilst labour may be as low as 15 per cent.<br />

3 Scientific Control<br />

Th'ere will undoubtedly be an increasing reliance on standards and specifications<br />

whic'h wi11 be adm'inistered 'by technical people with no particular .allegiance to<br />

traditional materials such as timber. It will be their job to specify and authorise<br />

the use 'of mate'rial1s in 'buildings and they will only wish to specify and use<br />

guarantee'd ones. Although at present timber may have difficulty in meeting sllc'h<br />

requirements the technology is available· to enable it to do so.<br />

4 Economy and Performance<br />

The use 'of performance standards will provide a base against which the performance<br />

can be judged and hence e'conomy estimated for particular components.<br />

Timber is in certain difficulty here because muc'h of its use has been traditional<br />

rather than based on design work. However, th'ere is no doubt that by developme'nt,<br />

improvements can be made in timber products to meet perforfmance standards.<br />

5 Maintenance<br />

Far too l,ig a proportion of our building force in this country is e'mployed in<br />

maintenance rather than on creating new buildings. There is littlle doubt that<br />

increasing attention will be paid to reducing maintenance and the use of preservatives<br />

and better surface coatings will have a big part to play in this.<br />

6 Quick Erection<br />

The combined 'effects of increasing cost of site labour, 'hold-ups due to bad<br />

weather and the need for more building win continue. The trend towards quick<br />

erection means that new methods of jointing panels together and ibetter methods<br />

of handling compone'nts on site will be required. It will also be necessary to<br />

obtain a better sequence of phased delivery and erection on site so that components<br />

are not lying on the ground in bad weather for long periods. The requirements<br />

of quick erection will obviously lead to a greater use of components and the<br />

present trend towards an increasing use of trussed rafters will continue, and this<br />

will 'be accompanied in the future by a greater use of fl'oor and wall panels, etc.<br />

Athough many building firms seem to be particularly bad at organising an<br />

efficient erection operation this is not peculiar to timber and hence s'hould not<br />

militate against the use of timber co'mponents.<br />

7 High Quality<br />

There are distinct signs that econ·om,y is not the only requirement which people<br />

demand in their 'houses. There will, I 'believe, be an increasing demand for higher<br />

quality products compared with the standard eco·nomy ones. Timber can g,o a<br />

long way to meeting this type of requirement. As an eX'ample there may well arise<br />

two levels of !performance for components in the future. One, a more costly but a<br />

much better performing product and two, an economy one. Better quality can be<br />

provide'd at extra cost and timber can certa1inly 'meet any demand that will arise<br />

for a higher quality. Examples of this co'uld well be in two standards 'of door, a<br />

more expensive stable variety as well as an economy ·one, and in wind'ows there is


THE FUTURE OF TIMBER IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY 251<br />

lower moisture contents. However, there is no p,oint in drying the timber to a low<br />

moisture content if p,rece'ding and during the 'building operatio,n it is re·-we·tted<br />

appreciably. There are really two main solutions to the problem. One is a change<br />

in building 'practice which 'would include such things as all dry construction, phased<br />

delivery so that the material does not lie about on site, roofs put on quickly as<br />

possible and heating applied early in the life of the ,building. The other solution<br />

which can only be partially successful is to take every opportunity in design to<br />

minimise the effects of timber move-ment.<br />

9 Preservation<br />

The need for preservative treatment of non-durable timber is dependent on the<br />

hazard to which it is exposed and in wooden buildings timber may be exposed to<br />

a variety of conditions dep,ending up,on its location. The two major hazards, fungal<br />

decay and insect attack, can be considered separately. Fungal decay could be completely<br />

eliminated if the moisture content of the ,voo'd could b'e kept below that required<br />

to support fu-ngal gro'wth (about 20 per cent). Where the' moisture content<br />

is 'likely to be higher, e.g. fillets in concrete, external cladding, places where high<br />

conde.nsation is probable, well painted external joinery, preservative treatment is<br />

desirable. On the other !hand attack by insects is not depende-nt on damp conditions<br />

but on the availability of suscepti'ble sapw'ood in which they can lay eggs. Apart<br />

from hylotrupes areas (mainly in Surrey) it is debatable whether treatment against<br />

insect attack is necessary. This depends to some exte,nt on the cost of initial treatment<br />

compared 'with subsequent necessary remedial treatment. A serious decay<br />

problem which has come to light in recent times is the pre-mature decay of exterior<br />

joinery. At present there is no requirement written into Building Regulations for<br />

the treatment of joinery timber but the revised Codes of Practice and activities of<br />

NHBRC are drawing attention to the need for preservative treatment in this area<br />

and it will undou'btedly become an increasing requirement. Most suppliers of<br />

timber windows now only offer treated timber products.<br />

10 Stress Grading<br />

While the greatest single obstacle to the efficient use of solid timber as a<br />

structural material is its variability, without some form of selection only very small<br />

loads can be safely carried by timber me'm'bers. T'herefore, in order to utilise tim'ber<br />

to the best advantage it is essential at some stage to introduce some form of<br />

grading. If the requirements of buildings in future are going to 'be: based on a<br />

guaranteed technical product, stress grading will beconle increasingly imp'ortant.<br />

By using ap'propriately graded material we can reduce the amount of timber in<br />

roofs and floors of houses and also guarantee them against collapse. Stress grading<br />

is purely a grading of the material on its ability to carry loads. Until recently<br />

there has only been one' method of stress grading of timber, that is by visual<br />

examination. Geneltally efforts over the years to introduce systems of visual stress<br />

grading have failed. This method is concerned with measuring the size of defects<br />

and deciding whether or not the;y are above or below a certain accep1table level.<br />

In the past fe'w years considerable progress has been made in the mechanical<br />

stress grading of timber. Various prototype machines ;have been studied and three<br />

of these are now in commercial use in the: United Kingdom. Most of the work on<br />

these machines is based on the relationships which exist betwee'n the strength of<br />

timber and its stiffness or the amount that it deflects under load. Briefly, mechanical<br />

grading consists of fee,ding timb'er continuously through a machine, the· machine<br />

imposes a small load and measures the resulting deflectio-n. It is then assumed<br />

that with a particular size the strength of the tim'ber is pro'portional to· this de'fie,ction,<br />

that is, pieces w'hich only deflect a small amount will be strong and those<br />

with a relatively high de'flection will ,be weak. One very important advantage of<br />

machine grading is that 'concerned with the various species of timber. A grading


252 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

machine grades pieces of tim'ber regardless of species. In other forms of visual<br />

grading one has to know the species of tim-ber before it can be given a rating.<br />

The new methods of stress grading 'will enable us in the future to obtain the best<br />

com,bination of safety and economy with different sizes and grades of timber for<br />

particular 'purposes.<br />

11 Products<br />

(a) Doors<br />

Because of the emergence of performance standards and the possible need for<br />

higher quality products, research has \been going on into the performance of<br />

doors in service. This has primarily been concerned with the effects of distortion<br />

due to differential temperature and humidity conditions on the two faces and<br />

the tendency of doors to leak to both air and water. Considera'ble, progress has<br />

bee'n made in understanding the factors which cause: distortion of doors. Distortion<br />

can ,be reduced by the use of vapour barriers. Also paint films can delay<br />

the take up of moisture. Similarly work has been in progress to study air and<br />

water leakage of doors and this can be reduced to aecepta'ble levels by suitable<br />

methods of sealing.<br />

(b) Windows<br />

Proposals have ;been made by various public organisations for performance<br />

standards on windows for such pro'perties as<br />

i Thermal movement<br />

ii Thermal insulation<br />

iii Mechanical strength<br />

iv Resistance- to wear<br />

v Sound insulation<br />

v-j Fire resistance<br />

vii 'Convenience in use<br />

viii Wind gust strength<br />

None of these performances is as yet supported 'by a national standard test<br />

method 'but some research work is proceeding to enable ,this to be done.<br />

There are, hO'wever, standard test methods for air penetration and water resistance.<br />

These methods are specified in a British Standard and various research<br />

laboratories are studying the performance of timber windows in this context.<br />

There is every reason to -believe, that timber windo-ws can meet any requirements<br />

that will be asked for in this respect.<br />

(c) Roofs<br />

Work at FPRL on trussed rafters has resulted in the, amount of timber in a<br />

house roof 'being reduced from about 60 cu. ft. to about 40 cu. ft. per dw'e'lling.<br />

Also at the same time erection times have reduced dramatically to about onetenth<br />

of traditional roofs. This has been achieved by the development of trussed<br />

rafters using the minimum amount of material an-d special jointing plates. At<br />

present there are about 90 small plants making trussed rafters in the United<br />

Kingdom and last year production amounted to something approaching a<br />

million and a half trussed rafters.<br />

(d) Floors and Walls<br />

Research to reduce the amount of tim-ber and the erection time to a minimum<br />

in floors and walls ,has lagged behind work.on ro-ois. However, this has not<br />

entirely been the fault of timber. Generally it has been found that the accuracy<br />

of building has not permitted the prefa'brication of floor units to fit in between<br />

other building materials, e.g. brick. Therefore, prefabrication has lagged behind.<br />

However, the increasing use of timber walls and the belief that accuracy.in<br />

building is improving has led to an increasing amount of research being directed<br />

to'wards tim'ber wall and floor units. There is little doubt that this will lead to a


THE FUTU-RE OF TIMBER IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY 253<br />

better performance level for these components linked with a saving of<br />

m.aterial.<br />

12 Production<br />

Due to lack of continuity of orders there, has been a lack of incentive to get<br />

better production metho-ds in many timber components. However, achievements<br />

in the production of doors and wind,?ws where a very high level of production and<br />

quality is maintained at a relatively Iow cost indicates that similar achievements<br />

are possible should demand increase for other timber components.<br />

13 Reduced Maintenance<br />

This item covers points already mentioned such as preservative treatment and<br />

be,tter design. In addition there is work on surface coatings to protect the materials.<br />

Surface coating of tim'ber is a subject which has until recently ;b-e'en rather<br />

neglected. However, we are now giving much more attention to this important<br />

subje·ct. There is little dou·bt that the future use of timber products as external<br />

cladding materials is linked to the development of surface coatings requiring the·<br />

minimum of maintenance. A number of related projects are being studied at<br />

p,resent in the painting of timber and timber p·roducts and these should enable<br />

timber to maintain its position as a widely used external building material.


FRUIT DEVELOPMENT AND<br />

INSECT PESTS OF TERMINALIA IVORENSIS A. CHEV.<br />

By N. JONES (Silviculturist) and J. KUDLER (Entomologist)<br />

Forest Products Research Institute, Kumasi, Ghana<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Terminalia i ...orensis is likely to become an important plantation species in West<br />

African countries. Phenological studies have been initiated to examine the seasonal<br />

variation in flower and fruit development. Though fruits are readily available many fall<br />

before reaching maturity, the germination period is long and the viability poor. The<br />

results of pre-treatment studies suggested that poor germination was due to some<br />

factor other than dormancy. Investigations led to the discovery of two weevils,<br />

Nanophyes sp., and Auletobius sp., which are probably responsible for the fruits<br />

falling before ripening and the poor quality of mature fruits.<br />

Introduction:<br />

The amount of natural forest in the world is constantly being reduced through<br />

exploitation. Most countries have now adopted some type of afforestation programme<br />

to either maintain or create a forest resource. Almost any species which can be raised<br />

as a plantation crop over a reasonably wide range of sites becomes important.<br />

Terminalia ivorensis is such a species to West African forestry practice. It fruits plentifully<br />

and regularly, stores well, can be raised in large numbers in forest nurseries,<br />

transplants with low mortality and has an acceptable growth rate. At present only a<br />

relatively small volume is exploited from the natural forest but the tree has regular<br />

form, and the timber a good figure and distinctive colour. These factors will all be<br />

important as plantations mature.<br />

It has already been said the fruits are readily available; however, germination is<br />

poor and the germination period is long. Taylor (1960) states that germination can<br />

be raised to 40% by pre-treating and the irregular germination period averages 32<br />

days. He also refers briefly to an attacking insect. A large number of pre-treatments<br />

were tested at the Forest Products Research Institute, Kumasi, Ghana (See Anon.<br />

1968, Damptey 1967, Jones 1969), none of which improved on 40% with any certainty<br />

nor did they reduce the germination period. They served only to emphasise the fact<br />

that a more fundamental research technique is needed (Jones 1969). It is necessary<br />

to know how many sound seeds are sown before an accurate estimate of the viability<br />

can be made.<br />

A study of the anatomical characteristics of a samara revealed it is made up of two<br />

halves with a plate of weak tissue between. By squeezing the fruit in a vice it was<br />

possible to rupture it along this plate and extract the seeds. About 50 %ofall the stored<br />

fruits randomly selected for testing did not contain seeds or contained seeds attacked<br />

by insects (Jones and Kudler 1968). This led to the examination of immature fruits<br />

in the 1969 fruit development season (Jones and Kudler 1969), which is much easier<br />

than that of mature fruits. Further observations were made in 1970 on even younger<br />

fruits.<br />

Phenological Records:<br />

Very little work is recorded regarding periodicity of the various characters in the<br />

life cycle of forest trees in West Africa. Initiation of tree improvement programmes<br />

has led to the realisation that insufficient is known about time of flowering and the<br />

development offruits on different trees. This information is essential to the organisation<br />

ofseed orchards and to planning ofcontrolled pollination studies. General information<br />

for Ghanaian species is readily available (see Taylor 1960) but details of between-tree<br />

and between-site variation are needed. The tree improvement programme in Ghana<br />

was launched in 1966 (Jones 1966) and Terminalia ivorensis was included.<br />

254


FRUIT DEVELOPMENT AND INSECT PESTS 255<br />

A number of Terminalia ivorensis trees were chosen at the different research centres<br />

throughout the high forest to collect data for flowering and fruiting studies. Notes<br />

are made each week on the condition of the leaves, flowers and fruits of each tree.<br />

Unfortunately not all the trees in the study flowered each year. Data covering the<br />

period July 1967 to July 1968 are complete for the Bobiri, Pra-Anum and Somanya<br />

Research Centres and for Kumasi. Only one tree of the seven visited flowered at<br />

Bobiri, all seven trees in the Pra-Anum group flowered and both trees at Somanya.<br />

Nine trees are visited at Kumasi, and though records are complete for three years,<br />

only one tree flowered in these three years which was in the 1967-68 flowering season.<br />

Flowers are not easy to see, both the Somanya trees were recorded as having developing<br />

fruits but never flowers; it was the same with the Bobiri tree. All fruits developing<br />

on the Bobiri and Kuumasi trees fell before they were ripe. Only one tree at Somanya<br />

had fruits which ripened, three of the seven Pra-Anum trees bore ripe fruits. In the<br />

1967-68 flowering year, out of twenty-five trees visited each week, eleven flowered<br />

but only four bore ripe fruits. This is a high mortality and such a situation occurring<br />

in seed orchards could prove disastrous to a plantation programme.<br />

Fruit Development:<br />

It is important to know the sequence and timing of events. Taylor (1960) records<br />

flowering of Terminalia ivorensis in Ghana from the end of February until the end of<br />

June. Fruits are recorded between mid-January and the end of April. Fruits in this<br />

sense refers to the mature ripe fruits, therefore the fruit development period, i.e. from<br />

the first record of flowering, is from the end of February in one year until the end of<br />

April the following year. In fact, immature fruits may be falling from some trees while<br />

fruits from the previous fruiting season are still maturing on others.<br />

Taylor stresses that his data refer to a species rather than individual trees and that<br />

variations may occur on any particular site. Studies to relate phenological sequences<br />

to seed orchard management must take into account individual tree variation. In the<br />

current phenological studies all the Pre-Anum trees were still in flower during the first<br />

week of July 1967 and immature fruits were falling from them all by the third week of<br />

July. Immature fruits did not start to fall from the Bobiri trees until the first week of<br />

September, the Somanya trees until the third week of September and the Kumasi<br />

trees until the first week of October. Ripe fruits were falling from one tree in Somanya<br />

between the third week of January and the last week of March 1968. All the ripe<br />

fruits fell from the three Pra-Anum trees in the first week of February 1968.<br />

(a) Immature Fruits:<br />

Observations on immature fruits which started in August 1968 are recorded by Jones<br />

(1969) and Anon. (1969). Between August and November, two small seeds were seen<br />

in the cavities of the soft green fruit cases. One seed develops rapidly after this and by<br />

the beginning of December cigar-shaped seeds more or less fill the seed cavities. This<br />

is the period when the tissues harden. It is impossible to slice into the seed cavity after<br />

the first or second week in January.<br />

Immature fruits were collected from a tree near Kumasi in mid-July 1970 to continue<br />

the investigations. The length of the developing fruits (excluding the wing) were<br />

measured. In July the fruits were from 5 to 6 mm. long with a maximum length of<br />

8 mm., by the end of July 6 to 7 mm. with a maximum of 12 mm. The mean length<br />

ofthe 1969 September collections was 14 mm. and a number ofmature fruits in storage<br />

were measured and the mean length was 20 mm. Therefore since flowering takes place<br />

in April or May, development of the fruit is most rapid during the August/September<br />

period and the mature size is probably attained some time in December.<br />

(b) Seed Development:<br />

The fruit case develops more rapidly than the seed at first. Seeds were approximately<br />

1 mm. in length in the July 1970 collections and only about 2 to 2.5 mm. in the late


256 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

September 1969 collections. The cavity in which the seed develops increases in proportion<br />

with the fruit case. It is not until mid-November that there is any appreciable<br />

increase in the seed size. After this date elongation is rapid and the surviving seed<br />

soon fills the seed cavity.<br />

(c) The Mature Fruit:<br />

The indehiscent mature samara is described by Jones (1969). It is made up of a<br />

papery brown epidermis beneath which is a layer of tissues made up of large air and<br />

crystal filled vacuoles for buoyancy. Hard stony tissues surround the seed cavity.<br />

The plate ofweakness between the two developing carpels has already been mentioned;<br />

the fruit case always ruptures along this plane during germination.<br />

Insect Attack:<br />

In "Tree Seed Notes" (Anon. 1955) there is a comment that 30% of the fruits may<br />

be attacked. Taylor (1960) says many fruits are bored while they lie on the ground.<br />

No comment has been made on the insect causing the damage. Preliminary work on<br />

the subject is recorded by Jones and Kudler (1968) which dealt entirely with mature<br />

fruits which had been in storage for nearly a year or freshly collected mature fruits.<br />

The insect pest was found to be a weevil, later identified as Nanophyes sp. (Fig. 1)<br />

never previously recorded in Ghana. There were indications that at least 35 % of the<br />

fruits collected were attacked and this could mean that the weevil may considerably<br />

reduce both the quality and quantity of fruits which mature.<br />

The preliminary investigation showed the need for a study of the life cycle of the<br />

insect pest. This involved collections of premature fruits from Terminalia ivorensis in<br />

September and October 1969. It was evident that a vast majority of fallen immature<br />

fruits had punctures, often five to seven on a single fruit case; these were usually on the<br />

part distant to the point of fruit attachment. Some first instar larvae were found in the<br />

fruits. It seemed likely that the insect attack was responsible for the fruits falling<br />

(Jones and Kudler 1969). Examination of damaged fruits continued and development<br />

of the weevil was recorded. The first pupa was found inside the seed cavity in early<br />

December 1969 and the first exit holes later the same month. From this it was estimated<br />

that the life cycle of the pest is at least three months (Jones and Kudler 1970). The<br />

quality of mature fruits is considerably reduced. It can be seen from the figures in<br />

Table 1 that sometimes only 6% of the seeds develop. The level of mortality ranges<br />

from 43 % to 94 %.<br />

TABLE 1<br />

Reduction in quality of mature Terminalia ivorensis fruits caused by Nanophyes sp.<br />

Collection<br />

Date Place<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

No. of<br />

Seed-%<br />

Fruits Punctures per Fruits<br />

l"otal Fruit with Fully I Not Attacked<br />

No.<br />

Stained I Devel-<br />

Min. IMax.!Av. Walls<br />

Devel- by<br />

oped oped Weevil<br />

I<br />

1/12/69 Pra-Anun1 46 0 15 3 I 43 57 13 30<br />

3/12/69 Bia-Tano 31 1 16 7 31 52 16 32<br />

22/12/69 Mpraeso 36 1 14 4 29 6 41 53<br />

6/1/69 Asenanyo 43 1 21 5 43 7 37 56<br />

14/1/69 Asenanyo 86 0 15 3 75 16 41 43<br />

4/2/69 Asenanyo 90 0 15 5 78 27 19 54<br />

17/2/69 Asenanyo 110 0 16 6 91 37 19 44<br />

24/2/69 Asenanyo 100 0 11 5 88<br />

I<br />

33 13 54


6<br />

FRUIT DEVELOPMENT AND INSECT PESTS 259<br />

Fig. 1. A weevil, Nanophyes sp. a, egg; b, grub; c, pupa; d, adult. (Orig. J. Kudler.)<br />

Fig. 2. Fruits of Terminalia ivorensis observed in early September 1970 at umasi.


260 COMMO WEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Fig. 3. A weevil, Auletobius kuntzeni m. a, blackish spots on upper-surface of immature<br />

Terminalia ivorensis fruits, indicating punctures; b, egg; c, larva; d, pupa; e, adult. (Orig.<br />

J. Kudler.)


262 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Acknowledgments:<br />

The authors are greatly indebted to Mr. E. Voss, Harderberg, West Germany,<br />

for identification of weevils, and to specialists of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Institute of<br />

Entomology, London, for identification of the other insect species involved.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

ANON. (1955). Tree Seed Notes. F.A.O. For. Development Pap. No. 5, Rome.<br />

ANON. (1968/69). Annual Report of the Forest Products Research Institute, Kumasi. C.S.I.R.,<br />

Ghana.<br />

DAMPTEY, H. B. (1967). Germination of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I.,<br />

Ghana, 4: 8-10.<br />

JONES, N. (1966). Tree Selection and Seed Improvement in Ghana. Tech. Note No. 1, F.P.R.I.,<br />

Ghana, 13p.<br />

JONES, N. (1969). The Influence of Certain Pre-Treatments and Conditions for Germination<br />

on the Seeds of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I., Ghana, 3(1): 9-18.<br />

JONES, N. (1969). A Description of Fruit of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I.,<br />

Ghana, 3(3/4): 11-15.<br />

JONES, N. and KUDLER, J. (1968). A Report on the Preliminary Work on the Influence ofWeevil<br />

Attack on the Germination of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I., Ghana,<br />

2(2): 11-14.<br />

JONES, N. and KUDLER, J. (1969). Some Particulars Concerning Weevil Attack on the Fruits<br />

of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I., Ghana, 3(3/4): 7-10.<br />

JONES, N. and KUDLER, J. (1970). Recent Developments in Fruiting Studies of Terminalia<br />

ivorensis A. Chev. and Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum. Affected by Insect Pests.. Paper<br />

for the 7th Biennial Conference of W.A.S.A., Ibadan, Nigeria, 7p.<br />

TAYLOR, C. J. (1960). Synecology and Silviculture in Ghana. Th. Nelson and Sons, London.


ARE GRADUATES IN FOREST SCIENCE QUALIFIED FOR<br />

APPOINTMENT TO PROFESSIONAL POSTS?<br />

by 'C. L. WICHT<br />

Professor of Silviculture, University of Stellenbosch.<br />

A COpy of an address to the South African Institute of <strong>Forestry</strong>, delivered in May,<br />

1969, b'y Mr. 'Craig Anderson, National Chairman of the South African Timber<br />

Growers' Association, was re'cently handed to me, in which.Ihe commented on<br />

university training in forestry.* As I addressed the <strong>Forestry</strong> Society of Stellen'bosch<br />

University on a similar subject in March" I have decided to repeat some of the<br />

remarks I made then in order to indicate what can reasonably 'be expecte'd from<br />

the gradualte in forest 'Science when he takes up a job. At the same time I shalll<br />

try to correct some rather prevalent erroneous ideas of what un1iversity training<br />

aims at.<br />

Mr. Anderson has stressed the poor remuneration received for forestry services,<br />

and this is a matter 'which might well be take'n up Iby SATGA and the Institute<br />

of <strong>Forestry</strong>. <strong>Forestry</strong> is much more than the immediate profitable management<br />

of plantations and sawmills or pulpmills, wh'ich might well be achieved by<br />

experienced non-professionals in charge. But, however efficient current management,<br />

'based purely on past experience, may 'be, it will fail if the manager does<br />

not have the knowledge of the fundamental 'bionomic and economic principles<br />

on w'hiclh forestry production is ibased. This knowledge is 'imparted at the<br />

University so !that the graduate in a professional post will not merely know how<br />

to manage, but alsol why the work s'hould be .organised in a, particular way and<br />

w'hat modific'ations may 'be needed to adapt production to' fluctuations in the<br />

general economy olr changes in the quantity and quality of the products in<br />

demand. The industry should be pre'pared to renumerate the graduate in forestry<br />

adequately and then expect from him the "knolw' how" and "know why" to ensure<br />

an enterp'rising and efficie,nt undertaking. The graduate who cannot meet these<br />

requirements will ibe unfit for the jOlb! for reasons other than defe:cts in 'his training.<br />

A student w'hose training is :based o'n the; extension of his factual knowledge,<br />

as happ'e:ns at technical colleges and the School for Foresters, will so'on find that<br />

his ideas have 'beeo-me antiquated. The University student whose training, even<br />

as an under-graduate', lis /based on :a logical, scientific foundation, should -be able,<br />

after he has graduated, to ensure that he remains informe'd of the newest developments<br />

in his field. He should, exactly like the members of the teaching staff at<br />

the University, supplement his knowledge constantly Iby studying technical publications,<br />

'by his own o:bservations or, even, ib'y undertaking original research.<br />

If he 'has special1ised, after leaving the University, in a particular field, :he should,<br />

after five or ten years, Ibe a'ble tOI discuss problems with 'his former lecturers<br />

and professors on, at least, an equal footing.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> includes also Ithe develop,ment and planagement of water catchmeints,<br />

nature reserv'es in natural forest a'nd veld and outdoor recreational areas. It<br />

undertakes the arresting of mo,ving dunes and provides expertgu'idance on the<br />

c'hoice of trees planted for woodlots, s'hade, shelter and ,ornament on farms, and<br />

in parks, gardens and along streets in to,wns. It is an essential task of forestry<br />

to ensure that adequate green areas are maintained. In the increasingly teehn,ological<br />

and me:chanistic world, forestry must "verdurise" the landscape to constitute<br />

a wholesome, health-preserving environment for man. Verdant forests and veld<br />

of adequate extent are needed to p,rovide areas where the internal com'bustion<br />

engines, the factories and crammed, gasping populations do, not raise the carbon<br />

di-oxide content of the atmosphere to' st'ifling levels, or even poison it with<br />

carbon monoxide.<br />

* See March <strong>Review</strong>, Page 62.<br />

263


266 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

and then translate the research findings into direct practical prescrip't'ions to be<br />

applied 'by Foresters and other technicians. It is not the task ,of the "boffin"<br />

to frame results of research in the form of instructions, or present his material in<br />

.pop'ular form. It iis the task of the graduate in forestry who is engaged in practical<br />

forestry to do this. With the 'basic training provided in the four years needed<br />

to qualify for the B.Sc. degree in forestry he sho,uld not find research papers<br />

a'bstruse. If he were to 'be trained merely to manage· plantations, sawmills and p'ulpmills<br />

in accordance with current practice, he would no;t be able to follow the<br />

papers in modern scientific forestry journals, which necessar'ily include the concep'ts<br />

and terminology of mathematical statistics and other sp·ecialised .subjects. If<br />

management in forestry were left to men who cannot read and understand technical<br />

'papers and apply the latest contributions to forestry knowle'dge, the industry<br />

would stagnate and lose in the struggle for econom'ic survival.<br />

Reprinted by courtesy of the South African <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal.


The Editor,<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> <strong>Review</strong>.<br />

CORRESPONDENCE<br />

Forest Research Institute,<br />

Traralgon, Victoria<br />

Australia.<br />

4th May, 1971.<br />

SIR-My congratulations to Professor Richardson on putting British forestry into its<br />

proper perspective (<strong>Review</strong> De'c. 1970). This, and E. R. Huggard's article (<strong>Review</strong> Sept.<br />

1970) should be required reading for all British foresters, especially those in the private<br />

sector. Perhaps it is no coincidence that they are both from the same school of forestry,<br />

and must surely augur well for the quality of their future graduates. Moving from private<br />

British forestry to industrial plantation forestry in Australia, I can only agree that for too<br />

long forestry in Britain has been a "rural pursuit" and "cottage industry".<br />

However, Professor Richardson's evidence for a flood of low cost material into world<br />

markets is not entirely convincing. Concerning tropical hardwoods I doubt whether his<br />

two big "ifs" (top of p. 327) are as capable of such an early solution as he hopes. With<br />

regard to man-made forests the majority of these are being planted to satisfy existing<br />

needs within countries rather than as a basis for export industry, New Zealand, of course,<br />

being a notable ,exception. While many sub-tropical man-made forests can produce spectacular<br />

yields there are still relatively small areas being planted. It has been estimated by<br />

FAO (World Symposium on Man-Made Forests, Canberra, 1967) that the average yield<br />

from the 80 million hectares of man-made forests to be planted between 1966-1985 will<br />

be only 5m 3 /hectare/year. This is dU'e to the preponderance of planting in the North<br />

Temperate zone, particularly the D.S., Japan and Europe.<br />

British forestry which should be able to produce at least 10m 3 /hectare/year, and hopefully<br />

more, is thus in a relatively better position than most of its potential competitors.<br />

The only way to capitalise on this inherently favourable position is to introduce the<br />

massive economies of scale practised in other countries. New Zealand, of similar land<br />

area, is planning in terms of 60,000 hectare HP. radiata equivalent" forest units. Considering<br />

differences in growth rate I would agree with Professor Richardson's assertion of<br />

100,000 hectares-plus for Britain. This will certainly need a radical rethink in terms of<br />

existing land use but I believe this to be an essential and long-overdue exercise.<br />

The position of the private woodland (sic) owner is as usual the most difficult to<br />

resolve. A suitably placed owner could certainly participate in these large production<br />

units provided his individual blocks were not less than, say, 500 hectares and could thus<br />

accommodate the intensive mechanisation necessary to reduce costs to an acceptable level.<br />

The smaller owner may be able to find his own salvation, either in the creation of<br />

Professor Richardson's "resorts" (as some notable owners already have), or encourage<br />

acquisition by local authorities for recreation and amenity management. This latter solution<br />

has already found limited application in areas of great public pressure.<br />

The many areas of private woodland that do not fit the above categories present a<br />

difficult problem. Present attitudes and fiscal structures merely encourage the pretence<br />

that "economic forestry" is possible with such areas, and have prolonged the establishment<br />

of scattered woodlands of myriad species. Perhaps the Dedication Scheme has been<br />

too favourable for too long. If "strate'gic reserve" is an outmoded concept for British<br />

state forestry should it not also be so for the private sector? The war-time debt has been<br />

amply repaid. Continuation of the Dedication Scheme and present tax structure may<br />

well be desirable but in many cases must more logically be regarded as a state contribution<br />

to the maintenance of the British landscape, rather than an ultimate aid to the<br />

balance of payments.<br />

267<br />

D. J. DANBURY.


CORRESPONDENCE 269<br />

Copy of a letter from the Director, Nature Conservancy to the Editor,<br />

Daily Telegraph, 9th July, 1971.<br />

SIR-Peter Simple's attack on the <strong>Forestry</strong> Committee of Great Britain and the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Commission (July 6th) is so contrary to ecological fact that his assertions cannot go<br />

uncorrected.<br />

Britain more than any other country in Europe has an appalling record of the destruction<br />

of our natural forest by man's greed and thoughtlessn'ess. It is almost entirely due<br />

to private forest owners and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission that we have any substantial areas<br />

of forest left.<br />

Since the establishment of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission we have seen impressive efforts<br />

to reafforest areas of the country which once carried trees. The low fertility of these<br />

sites, and the degradation caused by man's past activities has necessarily meant the use<br />

of conifers, as these are the only tre'es which can cope with low fertility and severe<br />

exposure and make sufficient money to compensate the cost of planting.<br />

To say that the plantations are for the most part dull and hideous shows the same<br />

short-sightedness which reduced the areas being reafforested to their treeless state, and<br />

to claim that the soil is rendered unfit for any other purpose betrays an ignorance of soil<br />

ecology which is frightening, not least because the view is so commonly held.<br />

While the conversion of broadleaved woodland and scrub to conifers gives rise to<br />

some concern, because of the shortage of broadleaved woodland in this country, the<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission's new hardwood policy has already recognised the dangers and<br />

goes some way to remedying the situation.<br />

The reafforestation of large areas of this country, whether by private landowners or<br />

by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, is a major advance in conservation. The return of these<br />

areas to a woodland ecosystem opens up new possibilities for the future, and the conservation<br />

value of the conifer plantations themselves, particularly when they have grown<br />

through the early phase of establishment, is very much higher than is supposed by the<br />

casual visitor.<br />

The fact that the plantations also make a small profit should be a matter of pride.<br />

Does Peter Simple really think that anything would have been done to "plant trees for<br />

people" if the taxpayer had been asked to subsidise the total cost?<br />

Yours faithfully,<br />

J. N. R. JEFFERS,<br />

Director, Nature Conservancy,<br />

Grange-over-Sands, Lancs.


276 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

only doomed to failure; the publication of such attempts frequently lead to complacency<br />

and a sudden drying up of further inquiry. A compromise has to be reached.<br />

The Botany Division of the T.P.N.G. Department of Forests, under John Womersley's<br />

able leadership, seem to have achieved it successfully, by bringing out accounts of the<br />

chief timber families which aim to be as botanically accurate and up-to-date as circumstances<br />

will allow, yet are produced essentially as interim accounts which are subject<br />

to more or less complete revision from time to time as knowledge increases.<br />

Mark Coode's present contribution is the first such revision of the T.P.N.G. Manual<br />

of Forest Trees, nine parts of which have so far been produced, each covering a separate<br />

family. It contains a full account of all species, including shrubs and climbers, in the<br />

Combretaceae occurring in the region from New Guinea to the Solomons, leaving out<br />

only those recorded exclusively from West New Guinea. The clear and succinct descriptions<br />

avoid use of more than the essential botanical terms, and include much field<br />

information. Each tree species is accompanied by a good full page line illustration of a<br />

flowering or fruiting twig. Good keys are provided based both on fertile and on sterile<br />

characters; the latter are essential in manuals to be used in the forest. Coode concentrates<br />

on a very thorough account of the genus Terminalia, which provides important<br />

timbers both for local and overseas markets and has undergone an ebullition of speciation<br />

in that region; of the thirty-one species in the account, four are newly described<br />

and three are yet to be named botanically; an excellent field key is provided to this<br />

difficult genus which exhibits much phenotypic variation in leaf size and shape and in<br />

indeumentum. A particularly praiseworthy feature of the book is that gaps in information<br />

and areas of uncertainty in the definition of species are emphasised rather than<br />

glossed over; this should expedite the filling of such gaps in the future.<br />

Some criticisms can inevitably be levelled at individual details; I would mention the<br />

following in particular: The introductory definition of the family is relatively more<br />

technical and uses terms (infundibuliform, patelliform, for instance) that may dissuade<br />

foresters from proceeding further; it is a pity that a comment on the field characters<br />

of the chief tree genera is not included here; it is a pity also that no description of<br />

the uses to which the timbers are put in New Guinea is included in the introduction. In<br />

the introduction to Terminalia a separate list of field characters is included towards the<br />

end, far separated from the botanical definition; these might better be amalgamated;<br />

some field characters, such as the striking colour of the senescent leaves and the handsome<br />

convex plank buttresses, are 'Only mentioned, and this not always, in individual<br />

species descriptions. The manual would be much easier to use if the key diagnostic<br />

characters for each taxon were picked out in bold or italic print or underlined as has<br />

been done, for instance, in Corner's Wayside Trees of Malaya. It is unfortunate that the<br />

.two artists have adopted different styles of shading; in Damaris Pierce's clear drawings,<br />

using the technique adopted by Miss van Crevel in Flora Malesiana, there is no<br />

difficulty in distinguishing shading from hairs, but Terry Nolan's stippling is confusing<br />

in this respect. One final point: it can be dangerous to suggest specific epithets in the<br />

text for species which, presumably owing to lack of material, are yet to be published.<br />

All in all, though, this is a useful contribution and should prove itself an invaluable<br />

field companion to foresters.<br />

DR. P. S. ASHTON<br />

The Evergreen Forests of Malawi. By J. D. CHAPMAN and F. WHITE. <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, Oxford. 1970. Not priced.<br />

CHAPMAN, a botanically-minded forester with 13 years' service in Malawi, and White, a<br />

herbarium botanist who has done a good deal of field work in different parts of Africa,<br />

have combined to describe the evergreen forests of Malawi in 190 pages, with eight text<br />

figures and 60 photographs. Descriptive ecology is combined with sound taxonomy and<br />

discursive phytogeography.<br />

The evergreen forests of Malawi today are fragmentary and not very extensive. There<br />

is evidence that within re'cent times they occupie·d much larger are'as than their scattered<br />

remnants do today. They have been destroyed by cultivation or felling for timber and<br />

charcoal and, on a much larger scale, by fires started by man, and have been replaced<br />

for the most part by grasslands. Since 1964 Pinus patula has been planted for the Vipya<br />

pulpwood project at the rate of at least 4,050 he'ctares a ye'ar, mainly on these grasslands,<br />

but also on deliberately cleared natural forest areas.


REVIEWS<br />

l'he chapters by White on Floristics and Plant Geography and on Classification are<br />

wide ranging and perceptive. Chapman's descriptions of the forests in ten geographical<br />

sections are detailed and will be'come incre'asingly valuable to local ecologists who, in<br />

future years, want to know what the forests were like in the 1960s. The authors stress<br />

the scientific importance of preserving examples of these natural forests. At present most<br />

of the forest remnants are in national parks or in forest reserves constituted primarily<br />

for the prevention of erosion, flooding and desiccation. The responsibility for conservation<br />

thus rests firmly on the Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game, who should be encouraged<br />

to resist the temptation of replacing all the natural forests by fast-growing<br />

plantations.<br />

Foresters and agriculturalists, biologists and geographe'rs, in Malawi and neighbouring<br />

countries will find much of interest in this book for many years, and should be grateful<br />

that the publishers did not insist on a more concise treatment.<br />

R. W.J.KEAY<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> In Northern Ireland. Command Paper 550, 1970. Her Majesty's Stationery<br />

Office, Belfast. 35p.<br />

SINCE 1921 the Government of Northern Ireland has operated its own forest policy,<br />

administered by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division of the Ministry of Agriculture. The current aim,<br />

on the policy formulated in 1945, is to establish 150,000 acres of productive forestry by<br />

the end of this century. The State would hold by far the largest share of this. Already it<br />

has 100,000 acres of plantations, against 30,000 on private estates. At its current rate of<br />

planting, 4,500 acres annually, the present target will be achieved by the year 1975.<br />

The obje'ct of this ne'w Command Paper, presented to the Northern Ireland Parliament<br />

in November 1970, is simple. The Government proposes to double its target, aiming to<br />

secure 300,000 acres of well-managed plantations by the ye'ar 2000. It estimates that<br />

private owners can increase their acreage to 75,000, while the State can contribute<br />

225,000 or three-quarters of the whole.<br />

The reasoiiS1or this increase are well set out. Land is available in the poorer, hilly<br />

and peaty districts of western Ulster that can produce far more under timber crops<br />

than by hill farming. Illustrative yields, at present prices, are £7.5 per acre per annum<br />

for stock raising, contrasted with £40 for afforestation. The demand for timber exceeds<br />

supplies, and is likely to do so for many years. The markets are well diversified among<br />

sawmilling, chipboard, and pulpwood. The provision of local employment, currently for<br />

some 1,000 workers, is important, especially in the w'est of the province, which has few<br />

industries. If planting ce'ases, employment will inevitably decrease through the impact of<br />

mechanisation on harvesting; only an expanded planting programme can raise the present<br />

level. An ultimate figure of 9,000 people, in the woods, hills, and tourist industry, is<br />

suggested.<br />

Even when the expanded programme is realised, forests will only occupy 9 per cent of<br />

Northern Ireland's 3.3 million acres. Provision is, however made for five-yearly reviews<br />

of the target figure, which can be amended upwards or downwards in the light of<br />

agricultural prosperity and other economic factors. In round figures there will still be a<br />

million acres of "poor marginal land," or worse, that could be afforested later.<br />

The report makes no firm forecasts of likely economic returns, but from the Balance<br />

Sheet included it appears that 100,000 acres of plantations have been established for<br />

£24 million, an average of £240 per acre. Much of this is high-yielding Sitka spruce,<br />

which under the favourable climate and a modern regime of ploughing, fertilisation and<br />

skilled thinning, promises excellent outputs-possibly averaging 10 tons of timber per<br />

acre per annum throughout th'e rotation.<br />

The whole programme is lucidly set out, and its originators can be commended for<br />

saying so frankly: "We have a sound project here, let's double its size." We hope they<br />

will be given the funds and support they need to promote forestry where it can prove so<br />

profitable. Its values for recreation and amenity are rightly stressed in a re'gion for<br />

tourist attractions and pioneer work on National Forest Parks.<br />

H. L.EDLIN<br />

Joinery, by C. H. Tack. Publis'hed by F.P.R.L. and H.M.S.O.. £1.<br />

THIS YEAR The Worshipful Company of Carpenters, one of the great City of London<br />

Livery Companies, joined with the British Woodwork Manufacturers' Association, and<br />

7*<br />

277


REVIEWS 281<br />

Not much new research work is reported. Enplacement, pruning and thinning trials<br />

with Eucalyptus grandis are mentioned, as also sample plot and yield table work with<br />

Pinus Kesiya and Eucalyptus grandis. Progress was made with studies in wood structure,<br />

properties, handling, sawing and seasoning of small logs of Eucalyptus grandis. In the<br />

course of recent years the Department has started up a considerable range of research<br />

projects, using modern methods and installing some quite expensive equipment, with<br />

the intention of solving problems of afforestation with untried exotics before they arose<br />

on an industrial scale. Unfortunately the highly qualified and locally experienced staff<br />

needed for all these projects has been leaving, and the Department now records difficulty<br />

in finding suitable replacements and for keeping the projects going. This has been the<br />

case particularly with the Tree Improvement Research centre at Kitwe.<br />

The Government of Zambia's policy of carrying development into the remoter rural<br />

areas n1eans that a part of the Department's energies has been devoted to establishing<br />

and tending little local-supply plantations for peasants and subsistence cultivators. It<br />

seems a pity that the Department has to pretend to make these appear economic by<br />

selling the produce. The Government during the year made changes in the system of<br />

administration in the provinces, and through shuffles in Government portfolios the<br />

Department was twice transferred from one Ministry to another. This held up the<br />

declaration of new forest reserves; but none of the gazetted reserves, apparently, was<br />

lost-"the Department's field staff once again made a fine job of the unspectacular but<br />

important job of protecting over 20,000 square miles of forest estate" says the report.<br />

The Baikiaea plurijuga hardwood forests in the southern province continued to be<br />

exploited (to the extent of 2,343,000 cubic feet in the round) for railway sleepers and<br />

parquet flooring; without, however, much hope of replacement except by way of minimum<br />

girth limits and fire protection in selected areas. A fresh concession area was<br />

surveyed and planned in Seskake district, west of the Zambezi river. These dry west<br />

bank forests also yielded 250,000 cubic feet of sawlogs, mainly Ptercarpus angolensis,<br />

during the year.<br />

At the other end of the country, in the heavy "miombo" woodlands to the west of the<br />

Copperbelt, 1,562,000 cubic feet of Brachystegia/Julbernadi sawlogs were felled for the<br />

mining industry, again without organised silvicultural measures to replace or improve<br />

the growing stock, since it is hoped to supply the industry's future requirements from<br />

the plantations already mentioned.<br />

Staffing difficulties also affected the Forest College. The training programme for several<br />

cadres had to be curtailed. Moreover "a further year is reported without progress in<br />

training Zambians to be professional forest officers" writes the Chief Conservator.<br />

The Bee-Keeping sectipn also cut its programme. Ste'ady progress was made, however,<br />

with the Department's herbarium work and with the production of a fairly large-scale<br />

map of the vegetation of this large country.<br />

One gains an impression from reading this report that the loss of so many experienced<br />

and qualified men is beginning to make itself felt. During the long period of the mining<br />

boom the Department started up almost too many lines of activity, using highly<br />

sophisticated methods. The men remaining and their promoted subordinates are making<br />

a most commendable job of keeping so many of these lines going.<br />

C.E.D.<br />

Annual Report of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Service of Mauritius for 1968.<br />

FORESTRY in Mauritius appears to be fraught with uncertainty. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Service<br />

(the old Forest Department has newly become a diVlision of the Ministry of Agricul,ture<br />

and Natucral Resources) ha,s been hard at work replanting forest land devastated by the<br />

cyclones of 1960. In March 1968 "practically all the forest plantations" in the dependency<br />

of R!odvigues were ann'ihilated by yet another cyclone. Government during the year<br />

spent Rupees 3.9 million on the repair and maintenance of forests. However, jt has still<br />

not proved possible to make any final allocation of land to forestry, so as to provide<br />

security of tenure. Out of 66,000 arpents of "Crown Forest Estate," 15,000 arpents have<br />

recently been "allocated to non-forestry uses," mainly tea-planting. (1 arpent = 1.043<br />

acres).<br />

L,and-use planning must be dtifficult in a mountainous island with a total extent of<br />

750 square miles and a population of 800,000. Priorifties must be very hard to decide.<br />

Meanwhile the Report cover,s a year of great activity. An area of 1,625 arpents was


284 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

There is already a well established harvesting and processing industry in the private<br />

sector. This is shown by the fact that less than one per cent of the timber harvested was<br />

exported in log form. During the year the Tanga plywood factory improved production<br />

but log supply difficulties were encountered by the Moshi plywood factory and the match<br />

factory. There was an overall increase in the quantity of timber harvested due to an<br />

improvement in demand from both local and export markets. Pterocarpus angolensis (a<br />

high quality furniture wood) provided the greatest volume, most of it from unreserved<br />

land. It was followed by Podocarpus spp. (utility softwoods), Brachylaena hutchinsii (a<br />

decorative flooring and carving timber) and Brachystegia spp. (utility hardwoods). The<br />

37t per cent increase in Brachystegia from 1967 is attributed to greater building activity<br />

and it is encouraging that this difficult but plentiful hardwood is justifying the intensive<br />

research and development lavished on it in the past.<br />

Timber sales yielded the Division revenue of Shs.(T) 2,649,501 (approximately<br />

£154,000) and other produce (including poles and firewood) Shs.(T) 1,278,281 (approx.<br />

£74,000), a total of Shs.(T) 3,927,782 (approx. £228,000). Expenditure was Shs.(T)<br />

10,334,639 (approx. £600,850). In other words, like most <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries,<br />

Tanzania was still in the investment stage of developing and expanding its forest<br />

resources. Timber exports brought the country Shs.(T) 9,477,280 (approx. £551,000) in<br />

foreign currency but imports of wood and wood products cost Shs.(T) 77,746,160<br />

(approx. £4,520,000). Tanzania cannot afford to prolong this situation indefinitely and<br />

the role of the Forest Division both in saving imports and paying for them requires<br />

to be urged at every opportunity.<br />

Development of the forest estate progressed under the current Five-Year Development<br />

Plan. 6,658 acres of exotic softwoods were planted (plus a field scale trial of 436 acres)<br />

and 921 acres of fine and utility hardwoods were established. 2,025 acres of East African<br />

camphorwood were brought under tending for the first time while further tending was<br />

given to 74,000 acres of established plantations and over 22,000 acres of natural<br />

regeneration.<br />

The formation of a Road Unit in the Northern Circle was a commendable step to<br />

"relieve project managers of the extra work on road planning and construction, thereby<br />

giving them more time in carrying out cultural operations ..." 'Planning for logging<br />

and extraction in the plantations coming to maturity was given priority and plantation<br />

mapping from aerial photographs was the primary work of the three survey teams and<br />

drafting office. Assessment of forest land to locate areas suitable for timber growing was<br />

carried out in most parts of the country while inventories were undertaken in four<br />

major exotic softwood plantations to determine the sawlog volume available. Work on<br />

permanent sample plots in all softwood areas was completed and data processing began.<br />

These are some of the main features of a detailed, interesting and well-written report<br />

which shows a progressive Forest Division becoming commercially orientated to meet<br />

its country's needs of timber. Space does not allow discussion of the Division's research<br />

in silviculture, beeke-eping and timber properties, or its education, training, extension<br />

and information work, all of which were important supports to the Division's main<br />

effort of developing the nation's forest resources to the fulL One important feature,<br />

however, seems to underline the Division's determination to grow in efficiency,<br />

namely, the attention being given to worker training in addition to the training of graded<br />

staff. It is clear that the ten young Tanzians who returned during the- year from professional<br />

education overseas have, along with their colleagues already working in the<br />

Division, a thoroughly worthwhile task before them.<br />

R.G.S.<br />

Annual Report 1968.69: Division of Forest Produds, C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne,<br />

Australia. Pp. 78.<br />

AFTER 40 years of forest products research throughout the world, the C.S.I.R.O. appears<br />

to have little doubt about future needs. As announced in the previous annual report<br />

some 30 acres have been purchased as a future site, an approach road has now been<br />

constructed and some plantations planted. The total budget is not stated but, as outside<br />

assistance of $102,000 amounted to 6.9 per cent of available funds yearly, expenditure<br />

must approach $1,500,000. Presumably this is greater than in the previous year as the<br />

professional staff has been increased.


REVIEWS 285<br />

In addition to administrative and scientific services the Laboratory now consists of<br />

six main sections, viz, physiology and microstructure, paper science, physics, engineering,<br />

preservative and timber conversion. In the first mentioned section it is of interest to<br />

note the work being done on the modification of the structure and chemistry of the<br />

cell wall by thinning, fertiliser application, heartwood formation, bacteria attack, etc.<br />

The development of electron microscopic studies is well illustrated by one very excellent<br />

photograph. Paper Science includes, in addition to investigations on the raw materials<br />

and processes that are used to make paper, a programme of research into the mechanical<br />

properties, moisture relations, warping, etc., of fibreboard and even a survey of apple<br />

containers.<br />

The Physics Section deals with wood-water relationships, creep, surface properties<br />

and the deformation induced by mechanical or moisture changes. It also has an<br />

operational research unit which co-operates with the Timber Conversion Section in<br />

research on the drying of sawn and round timber, veneer peeling, finger jointing and<br />

bark removal. One interesting aspect of the Timber Conversion Unit is a study of<br />

methods to avoid damage, resulting from the release of internal stresses, during the<br />

felling and storage of logs.<br />

The Engineering Section is concerned with strength grading and the design of<br />

structures built of solid timber, plywood and glued laminations. It is working towards<br />

the drafting of a Timber Engineering Design Code. In work carried out by the Preservative<br />

Section it is of interest to note that a successful treatment has been developed<br />

for the protection of marine piling and for wood in cooling towers. Also that a method<br />

has been discovered for preventing posts, treated with copper-chrome arsenic salts, from<br />

glowing to destruction when in contact with grass fires.<br />

This very interesting summary of the work of the forest products division contains a<br />

list of publications issued in 1968. Unfortunately there is no indication of where copies<br />

of this report may be obtained or of its cost.<br />

A.V.T.<br />

Forest Insect and Disease Survey, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service Annual Report for<br />

the year 1969.<br />

NO VERY WIDESPREAD epidemics of either insect pests or diseases occurred in Canadian<br />

forests during 1969, but some caused severe damage in various localities and others were<br />

sufficiently prevalent to give rise to anxiety.<br />

Among the insects the most important were the spruce budworm (Choristoneura<br />

jUfflijerana), the jack-pine budworm (C. pinus pinus) and the larch sawfly (Pristiphora<br />

erichsonii). There were outbreaks of the first of these in various localities in the eastern<br />

provinces, and very large' populations persisted in New Brunswick. Che'mical control<br />

programmes are now being organised by several provinces with co-operation from the<br />

Survey. Jack-pine budworm populations increased in parts of Ontario and Quebec, but<br />

declined in Manitoba and western Ontario. Infestations by the larch sawfly were generally<br />

lighter than in recent years except in Manitoba and Ontario.<br />

Other insects of importance stressed in the report were the eastern hemlock looper<br />

(Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria) , and the birch casebearer (Coleophora fuscidinella),<br />

outbreaks of which occurred in Newfoundland; the saddled prominent moth (Heterocampa<br />

guttivitta), a defoliator of harqwoods in Ontario and Quebec; the large aspen<br />

tortrix (Choristoneura conflictana) in Manitoba; the spruce beetle (Dendroctonus obesus),<br />

severe local outbreaks of which occurred in parts of Alberta and British Columbia; and<br />

the green-striped forest looper (Melanolophia imitata), a defoliator mainly of conifers,<br />

the black-headed budworm (Acleris variana), on various conifers, and the western hemlock<br />

looper (Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa), all of which were on the increase in British<br />

Columbia.<br />

Of the more important pathogens, the beech bark disease (Nectria coccinea) caused<br />

high mortality in the Maritime Provinces, and many surviving trees are cankered;<br />

scleroderris canker (Scleroderris lagerbergii) was severe in pine plantations in Ontario<br />

and Quebec; jack-pine suffered from swe'et-fern blister rust (Cronartium comptoniae) in<br />

Quebec, especially in plantations where sweet-fern, rather than sweet gale, is its alternate<br />

host; atropeIlis canker (Atropellis piniphila) was prevelant in Alberta and the neighbouring<br />

territories, and seems to show no preferences between jack pine, lodgepole pine and


286 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

their hybrids; in the same region 12 per cent of the trembling aspen trees were infected<br />

by hypoxylon canker (Hypoxylon mammatum).<br />

The Dutch elm disease (Ceratocystis ulmi) continued to be of importance and to spread.<br />

The principal vector is the bark-beetle Hylurgopinus ru{ipes, but the introduced European<br />

bark-beetle Scolytus multistriatus is extending its range and was found in Quebec for the<br />

first time.<br />

In British Columbia special studies of dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium spp.), which<br />

are considered to be second in importance only to decay organisms, were initiated.<br />

F. G. BROWNE<br />

Hong Kong. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, 1969·70.<br />

FORESTRY plays a negligible part in the Hong Kong economy; it does however fulfil a<br />

very important role in the stated policy of preserving and improving the Colony's<br />

vegetable cover. There is no formally declared forest estate, although virtually all the hill<br />

lands covering some 300 square miles are Ctown land and include some 15,900 acres of<br />

woodland of which 13,200 acres are plantations.<br />

The Division's chief problem appears to be protection against fire. During the year<br />

under review some 342 acres of plantations were established (Table 10); on the debit<br />

side some 275 acres (Table 9) were destroyed by fire. On these figures afforestation in<br />

Hong Kong nlust be a very unrewarding task.<br />

In addition to its afforestation activities the Division is also responsible for the pro..<br />

vision of countryside amenities and wildlife conservation.<br />

E.W.M.<br />

South Australia. Annual Report, Woods and Forests Department, 1968-69.<br />

A REVIEW of any South Australia Annual Report is a comparatively simple task; firstly,<br />

the Conservator presents his own review or synopsis of the main features in the Report<br />

on the opening pages and, secondly, it revolves almost entirely round the "man-made"<br />

forest, in this case, the silviculture of P. radiatae The' 1967-68 Rejort (C.F.R. Vo!' 49 (2))<br />

forecast a continuing deterioration in the softwood demand; this appears to have<br />

materialised; the Report now under review, however, fore'casts "subsequently better<br />

figures" for 1969-70.<br />

The total area of Forest Reserves at the end of the year was 290,516 acres with a<br />

further 1,956 acres in process of reservation. This includes no less than 155,000 acres of<br />

softwood plantations, of which 8,000 acres were established during the year as against a<br />

target of 200,000 acres.<br />

As is to be expected from an expanding forest estate, the total production of softwood<br />

increased by 8,000,000 super feet, the slight reduction in timber for sawlogs<br />

being nlore than compensated by a 12,000,000 super feet increase in pulpwood<br />

production.<br />

Imports totalled 42,652,759 super feet of softwood timber and 13,746,152 super feet<br />

of hardwoods as against a total home production from State and private forests of<br />

231,105,956 super feet of softwood sawlogs and slightly less than 500,000 super feet of<br />

all types of hardwoods.<br />

In our review of last year's report we asked when the Department's clonal orchards<br />

would be in production. In this report comes the answer-200 lbs. of seed were harvested<br />

and sown during the year under review and it is estimated that a further 600 lbs. would<br />

be available in the following year. A project tackled and successfully established, a development<br />

of great significance in future establishment as it should eliminate the undue<br />

proportion of "wolf trees," excessive spiral grain, etc., which were features of earlier<br />

plantations.<br />

An interesting section of the report is devoted to the work done in collaboration with,<br />

or with facilities supplied to, other organisations, viz. The Southern .Regional <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

Research Institute, C.S.I.R.O. Divisions of Soils and Forest Products, University of<br />

Adelaide, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, the Australian National University and<br />

Melbourne University. Close liaison of this kind must be of considerable benefit to<br />

foresters in the Department, to research workers, to teaching staff and students.<br />

Commonwe'alth Foresters will note with regret that this is the last report to be written<br />

by Mr. Brian Bednall, retiring Conservator of Forests, a post he has held for the past


REVIEWS 287<br />

22 years. Mr. Bednall has attended the last five <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences.<br />

On all occasions he has made significant contributions to both technical and social<br />

activities: always a very popular delegate.<br />

E.W.M.<br />

F'orests Commission, Victoria, Autsrali'a-Annual Report, 1969-70.<br />

THE REPORT opens with a quotation from Schlich's "Manual of <strong>Forestry</strong>" on what is now<br />

generally known as "multiple use management." The opening paragraphs go on to<br />

describe in broad outline the problems confironting the Commission in its declared<br />

policy of mul'tiple purpose management embracing recreation and conservation.<br />

Once again the Chairman indicates a deteriorating financial situation. Although the<br />

excess of appropriated expenditure over appropriated revenue is only $A328,861 he is<br />

far from happy about the use of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Fund to meet shortages caused by<br />

inadequate financial provision.<br />

The area of reserved forest shows little change; there was an excision of 14,600 acres<br />

for National P'arks but a compensating addition is to be affected.<br />

There are at present 89 forest parks, scenic reserves, etc., comprising approximately<br />

63,716 acres of reserved forests; not a very large area when compared with the total of<br />

5,656,671 aores of reserved forest in the State.<br />

Operations in native hardwood forests continue to be of primary importance. A total<br />

of 33,740 acres were silviculturally treated including the regeneration of 10,235 acres<br />

by vafious methods.<br />

Softwood plantations established during the year amounted to some 6,131 acres, of<br />

which no less than 6,060 acres were P. Iradiata planted under the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-States<br />

Softwood <strong>Forestry</strong> Agreement, thus achieving the prescribe'd target of 38,000 acres by the<br />

end of the fourth year of the Agreement. Proposals for a new <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-State<br />

Softwood <strong>Forestry</strong> Agreement were under discussion during the year whereby the<br />

progress of planting in Victoria would be stepped up to 15,000 acres per annum from<br />

July 1971.<br />

The dominance of hardwoods is again emphasised in the Statement of Output for<br />

the year:<br />

Sawlogs<br />

Pulpwood<br />

Hardwood<br />

405,650,025 super it<br />

9,169,351 cubic ft<br />

So/twood<br />

47,823,293 super ft<br />

4,737,005 cubic ft<br />

As in most Australian R'eports the fire problem receives extensive coverage. No less<br />

than six separate appendices are devoted to fire statistics. Total area burnt was 12,576<br />

a'cres in 304 outbreaks.<br />

The Research section appears to divide its activities equally between softwood<br />

(P. radlata) and hardwood (E. regnans) problems. The Sirex Wood Wasp search and<br />

control activities continued. Although a spread of infestation is reported there are signs<br />

that parasitic control is proving effective.<br />

The Report is well produced, contains much of interest and many exce'llent photographs.<br />

The only criticism, and it is not peculiar to Victoria, is why must so many<br />

Forest Authorities devise their own set of appendices and statistical forms? How much<br />

easier was a reviewer's task in the days of the universally accepted Standard forms.<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Development Corporation: Report and Accounts 1970.<br />

E.W.M.<br />

AT 31.12.70 there were 189 projects with total estimated commitments of £171.6 million.<br />

New investments during the year totalled £18,869,591 comprising 22 new projects costing<br />

£9,589,493 and supplementary investments on existing projects £9,280,098. Impressive<br />

figures no doubt but on examination very disappointing to a forester; the 22 new projects<br />

included no forestry operation; existing projects include only four forestry operations.<br />

Guyana Timbers is reported to be of doubtful profitability and due to be reviewed;<br />

most successful project is Usutu PU1lp Co. Ltd., SwaziIand, which declared a divide·nd of<br />

24 per cent during the year; on a smaller scale the Pacific Lumber Co. Ltd., Fiji, showed


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 291<br />

ARCHER, G. R., B.Sc.For., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Mt. Hagen, Papua and New<br />

Guinea. 1965.<br />

ARGYLE, M. C., B.Se., Yew Tree Cottage, Wootton, Nr. Canterbury, Kent. 1948.<br />

ARMITAGE, F. B., B.Sc., M.A.(Oxon), 828 Island Road, Victoria, B.e., Canada. 1947.<br />

ARMOUR, M. R., Forest Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, P.O. Box 8111, Causeway,<br />

Rhodesia. 1957.<br />

ARNOTT, J. T., B.Sc., M.Sc., Forest Research Laboratory, 506 W. Burnside Road,<br />

Victoria, B.C., Canada. 1969.<br />

ASSOCIATION TECHNIQUE INTERNATIONALE DES BOIS TROPICAUX, 45 bis<br />

Avenue de la Belle Gabrielle, 94 N ogent sur Marne, France. 1970.<br />

ASSAM, Chief Conservator of Forests, Shillong, Assam. 1930.<br />

ATKINSON, G. A., For.Ccrt. <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Tasman Pulp and Paper Company<br />

Ltd., Kawerau, New Zealand. 1958.<br />

ATTWOOD, L., P.O. Box 452, Umtali, Rhodesia. 1957.<br />

AUNG DIN, M.A.(Oxon), B.Sc.(Hons), <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, F.A.O. Headquarters, Via<br />

delle Terme di Caracalla" ROlTIC, Italy. 1953.<br />

AUSTRALIA: LIBRARIAN, <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau, Canberra A.C.T., Australia.<br />

1964.<br />

AUSTRALIA: NEW SOUTH WALES COMMISSION, The Assenlbly Building,<br />

Margaret Street, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia. 1922.<br />

AUSTRALIA: QUEENSLAND FORESTRY DEPARTMENT, Box 944, G.P.O.,<br />

Brisbane Q 4001, Queensland, Australia. 1952.<br />

AUSTRALIA: SOUTH, Conservator of Forests, Woods and Forests Department,<br />

Adelaide, South Australia. 1929.<br />

AUSTRALIA: VICTORIA, The <strong>Forestry</strong> ConlDlissioners, 453 Latrobe Street, Melbourne,<br />

Victoria, Australia. 1922.<br />

AUSTRALIA: WESTERN, Forests Department, 3rd and 4th Floors, R. & I. Bank<br />

Building, 54-58 Barrack Street, Perth, Western Australia. 1930.<br />

AUSTRALIAN FORESTRY LEAGUE (Victoria Branch), 24 Studlcy Avenue, Kew,<br />

Victoria, Australia. 1921.<br />

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, <strong>Forestry</strong> Departmcnt, Box 4 P.O., Canberra<br />

A.C.T., Australia. 1965.<br />

AUSTRALIAN NEWSPRINT, MELBOURNE, Springvale Road, Victoria, Australia.<br />

1948.<br />

AYLIFFE, R., The Garden House, Richington Way, Seaford, Sussex. 1952.<br />

AYRES, G. C., "Rosehall," Whins of Milton, Stirling. 1950.<br />

BAHAMAS The, The Colonial Secretary, Government of the Bahamas, Nassau, Bahamas,<br />

West Indies. 1923.<br />

BAHARUDDIN BIN HAll GHAZALI, Forest Department, Kuala Lumpur, West<br />

Malaysia. 1965.<br />

BAIDOE, J. F., <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, P.O. Box 1917, Kumasi, Ghana. 1969.<br />

BAIGENT, L. E. H., Timber Merchant and <strong>Forestry</strong> Manager, G.P.O. Box 97, Nelson,<br />

New Z'ealand. 1953.<br />

BAIGENT, P. L., <strong>Forestry</strong> Director, H. Baigent and Sons Limited, P.O. Box 97, Nelson,<br />

New Zealand. 1954.<br />

BAILEY, E. C. J., B.Sc.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and<br />

Co-operatives, P.M.B. 3022. Kano, Kano State, N. Nigeria. 1966.<br />

BAIN, V. L., Dip.For.(Ran.), "Westbourne", 18 Ruxley Close, West Ewell, Surrey. 1926.<br />

BAKER, G. S., B.Sc.Econ., 6 Farmcroft, Northfleet, Kent. 1971.<br />

BALTAXE, R., M.A.(For.) Oxon., Federal Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.M.B. 5054,<br />

Ibadan, Nigeria. 1971.<br />

BALYAHA, M. B. M., Forest Ranger, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda. 1963.<br />

BAMBERGERS (TIMBER AND PLYWOOD) LIMITED, Bamberger House, St. Cross<br />

Street, London, E.C.1. 1964.<br />

BANERJEE, J., B.Sc.(Hons.), B.Com., Dip.For., "Aranyak", P.O. Gobardanga, (24<br />

Pargs), West Bengal, India. 1966.<br />

BANYARD, S. G., B.Se., Dip.Aero.Photo Int., Lecturer, I.T.C., Delft, Holland. 1966.<br />

BAPTISTE, E., Forest Guard, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Roseau, Dominica, W.I. 1953.<br />

BARNETT ESTATES LIMITED, The Manager, Montego Bay, Jamaica, West Indies.<br />

1959,


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 295<br />

CANADIAN FORESTRY ASSOCIATION, Canada Cement Building, 4795 St. Catherine<br />

Street West, Montreal 6 P.Q., Canada. 1924.<br />

CANADIAN CAR, Woodlands Operation, Box 67, Fort WiIliam, Ontario, Canada. 1969.<br />

CANT, P. R., For.Dip., Southern Rhodesia <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, P.O. Box 59, Melsetter,<br />

Rhodesia. 1951.<br />

CANUSA LIMITED, Timber Brokers, Villiers House, 41-47 Strand, London, W.C.2.<br />

1947.<br />

CARDEN, C. R., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), clo Department of Forests, Hoskins, West New<br />

Britain, T.P.N.G. 1971.<br />

CARLISLE, Dr. A., B.Sc.(Bangor), Biology Section, Federal Department of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

and Rural Development, Petawawa Experimental Station, Chalk River, Ontario,<br />

Canada. 1948.<br />

CARLSEN, C. S., B.C.F.S., 1018 Collenson Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.<br />

1956.<br />

CARMICHAEL, W., B.Sc.For., Dip.For., F.L.S., 60 Kirk Brae, Edinburgh EH16 6HU.<br />

1949.<br />

CARSON, G. L., C.B.E., B.Se.For.(Edin.), Conservator of Forests, Forest Department,<br />

Sandakan, Sabah. 1938.<br />

CARTWRIGI-IT, R. N., Dip.L.A., A.I.L.A., 42 Station Close, Riding Mill, Hexham,<br />

Northumberland. 1960.<br />

CARVER, J. E. A., M.A.(Oxon), C.F.S.(retd.), 60 Margaret Maytom Avenue, Durban<br />

North, Natal, South Africa. 1926.<br />

CARVER, M. W., M.E.F.A., Flat 7, 7 Hedgeley Avenue, East Malvern, Victoria, 3145,<br />

Australia. 1959.<br />

CATER, J. C., M.B.E., B.A., Deputy Chairman Osutu Pulp Co., Santa Estates, P.O. Box<br />

46, Dullstrom, East Transvaal, South Africa. 1945.<br />

CENTRO DE DOCUMENTACIO TECNICA, CDT-IIA, C.P. 406 Nova Lisboa,<br />

Angola. 1966.<br />

CEYLON FOREST DEPARTMENT,P.O. Box 509, Colombo, 'Ceylon. 1950.<br />

CHAFFEY, D. R., B.Sc., M.Se., Land Resources Division, Directorate of Overseas<br />

Surveys, Tohvorth Towers, Surbiton, Surrey. 1968.<br />

CHALI(, Dr. L., M.A., D.Phil., C.F.S.(retd.), 33 Belsyre Court, Woodstock Road,<br />

Oxford. 1924.<br />

CHALMERS, W. S., B.Se.(Aber.), Research Fellow, University of West Indies, St.<br />

Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago. 1957.<br />

CHAMBERS, W. P. C., Poppins, Cross-in-Hand, Heathfield, Sussex. 1929.<br />

CHAMPION, Sir Harry, C.I.E., D.Se., M.A., I.F.S.(retd.), Professor Emeritus (Oxon),<br />

Windrush, Boar's Hill, Oxford. 1926.<br />

CHANDLER, W. G., M.B.E., B.Se.For., General Manager, A.P.M. Forests Limited,<br />

Southgate, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 1931.<br />

CHAPMAN, G. W., M.B.E., M.A., Danallt-y-Gog, Conwyl Elfed, Carmarthen. 1932.<br />

CHAPMAN, E., B.Sc., Silviculturist, Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1956.<br />

CHAPMAN, J. D., B.Se., A.C.F., clo Forest Division, Ministry of Natural Resources,<br />

N.E. State, P.M.B. 47, Maiduguri, Nigeria. 1944.<br />

CHATURVEDI, J. K., M.Se., Forest Planning Officer, Balaghat, India. 1958.<br />

CHE DIN BIN eRE EMBY, State Forest Office, Perak, Ipoh, Malaysia. 1949.<br />

CHINNER, Lt.-Col. J. H., B.Sc.(Oxon), B.Se.(Melb.), 20 Pine Ridge, Donvale, Mel..<br />

bourne, Victoria, Australia. 1946.<br />

CHOATE, T. A. R., Forest Industry and Development Project, B.P. 369, Yaounde,<br />

Cameroon. 1967.<br />

CHONG PENG WAH, B. C. K., B.Se.Bot.&For., Dip.For., State Director of Forests,<br />

Selangor, 2334 Jalan Dato Onn, Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1962.<br />

CHRISTIAN, K. M., Forest Department, 144 Constant Spring Road, Kingston, 8,<br />

Jamaica, West Indies. 1970.<br />

CHRISTIE, A. C., D.F.C., B.Sc., D.F.D., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Fort Augustus, Inverness.<br />

1968.<br />

CHURCHILL AND SIM LIMITED, 27 Clements Lane, London, E.C.4. 1947.<br />

CIERA, P. G., Forest Department, P.D. Box 41, FJdoret, Kenya. 1970.<br />

CLARK, J. B., B.Se.For., P.O. Box 442, Lae, New Guinea. 1966.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 297<br />

CROOME, G. C. R., B.A.(Oxon), Canadian Forest Service, P.O. Box 4000, Fredericton,<br />

New Brunswick, Canada. 1962.<br />

CROWLEY, T. F., State Forester, Sancta Maria, Tourmakeady, Claremorris, Co. Mayo,<br />

Eire. 1971.<br />

CROWN, M., B.Sc.(Edin.), Pacific Logging Company, P.O. Box 10, Victoria, B.C.,<br />

Canada. 1956.<br />

CROWTHER, R. E., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), "Windrush," Pen y Graig, Aberystwyth. 1948.<br />

CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND<br />

FORESTRY, Newton Rigg, Penrith, Cumberland. 1971.<br />

CUMMING, D. G., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), clo Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of Aberdeen,<br />

S1. Machar Drive, Old Aberdeen. 1947.<br />

CURRIE, D. McD., B.Sc.(Edin..), I.F.S.(retd.), 12 Elm Road, Hereford. 1940.<br />

CURTIN, Dr. R. A., B.Sc.F., Dip.For., Ph.D., Research Officer, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Office,<br />

Taree, New Soutth Wales 2430, Australia. 1955.<br />

CYPRUS FOREST DEPARTMENT, Nicosia, Cyprus. 1939.<br />

DAGANAYASI, W.D., Forest Guard, Forest Department, Lautoka, Fiji. 1961.<br />

DAHL, R., Dip.For.(Sweden), 4 Carapook Street, Mount Gambier, South Australia. 1954.<br />

DALEY, P. A., ·B.Sc.(Wales), Forest Officer, clo Agricultural and Fisheries Department,<br />

393 Canton Road, 12th Floor, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 1948.<br />

DALKEITH, The Rt.Hon. The Earl of, D.L., M.P., Eildon Hall, Melrose, Roxburghshire.<br />

1951.<br />

DAL MONTE, G., Via Duch, Jolanda 27, 13100 Vercelli, Italy. 1970.<br />

DANBURY, D. J., B.Sc.For., M.Sc.F., Forest Research Institute, Gippshead Regional<br />

Station, 129 Argyle Street, Traralgon, Victoria, Australia. 1962.<br />

DARLING, D. D., Technical Officer, Forest Research Institute, Kelmscott, Western<br />

Australia. 1967.<br />

DATO HAJI WAN HASSAN .BIN ABDUL HALIM, State Forest Officer, Forest Department,<br />

Johore, Malaysia. 1948.<br />

DAVIDSON, D. F., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., clo British Embassy, Beirut, Lebanon. 1938.<br />

DAVIDSON, J., B.Sc.(UNE), B.Sc.For., clo Department of Forests, Keravat, New Britain,<br />

T.P.N.G. 1967.<br />

DAVIES, E. M. J., B.Sc., 8 Matilda Road, Glasgow, S.l. 1948.<br />

DAVIES, H., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), The Bursar's Office, University of Leeds, Leeds 2, Yorks.<br />

1952.<br />

DAVIES, N., B.Sc.F. Dip.For., clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Box 2667, G.P.O., Sydney,<br />

2001, New South Wales, Australia. 1950.<br />

DAVIS, C. W. R., Dip.For., Planning Forester, Peak Timbers Ltd., "Poponye," P.O.<br />

Box 31, Piggs Peak, Swaziland. 1964.<br />

DAVIS, D., B.A.For.(Oxon), I.F.S.(retd.), Priory Ford Lodge, Abbotsbrook, Boume End,<br />

Bucks. 1939.<br />

DAVIS, T. A. W., Dip.For.(Oxon), South Mullock, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire. 1924.<br />

DAWKINS, Dr. H. C., M.B.E., M.A.(Oxon), D.Phil.(Oxon), I.F.S.(retd.), <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1942.<br />

DAWSON, L. K., Chief Forester, clo P.O. Box 426, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 1954.<br />

DAY, R. J., M.A.(Oxon), M.Sc.F(UNB), Assistant Professor, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department,<br />

University of Toronto, Toronto 5, Canada. 1966.<br />

De GRACE, L. A., B.A., B.S.F., M.F., Industrial <strong>Forestry</strong> Service Limited, 1595 Fifth<br />

Avenue, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. 1950.<br />

de ROSAYRO, R. A., B.Sc.(Lon.), B.A.For.(Oxon), <strong>Forestry</strong> and Forest Industries<br />

Division, F.A.O. Headquarters, Via Terme di Caralla, Rome, Italy. 1939.<br />

DERRICK, R. G., B.Sc.For., "Southdield," Long Acre Road, Carmarthen. 1966.<br />

DESAI, H. K., B.Sc., A.I.F.C., Divisional Forest Officer, Ministry of Natural Resources,<br />

Oturkpo, B.P. State, Nigeria. 1969.<br />

DEVITT, J. G., D.Sc., B.Sc., Project Manager, Nepal, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, F.A.O.,<br />

Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy. 1949.<br />

DEWAR, R. J., e.M.G., C.B.E., B.Sc.(Edin.), 7612 Edenwood Court, Carderock Springs,<br />

Bethesda, Maryland 20034, U.S.A. 1956.<br />

DICK, J., B.Sc., Reclamation Department, Kaiser Resources Limited, P.O. Box 940,<br />

Fernie, B.C., Canada. 1966.<br />

DICKMAN, G., 7 Wentworth Avenue, Fernbank Road, Ascot, B'erks. 1970.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 299<br />

EVANS, W. R." c/o United Africa Company (Timber), Limited, United Africa House,<br />

Blackfriars Road, London, S.E.l. 1956.<br />

EYRE-HIGGINS, Lt.-Col. G., Old Bracondale, Cromer. 1948.<br />

FA'BER, H., P.O. Box 258, Marandellas, Rhodesia. 1960.<br />

FAIRBAIRN, Dr. W. A., E.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.E., 3 Ettrick Grove, Edinburgh 10. 1926.<br />

FALLOWS, N., 2511 Nicholby Drive, Limestone Gardens, Wilmington, Delaware,<br />

U,S.A. 19808. 1966.<br />

FARQUHAR, Dr. J. D., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), M.S., Ph.D., "Feldon," 3 Fairlight Road,<br />

Hythe, Kent. 1945.<br />

FARRER, R. P., M.A.(Oxon), Wayshill, Stogumber, Taunton, Somerset. 1951.<br />

FEARNSIDE, A., B.Sc.(Wales), Mount Strombo Forest, Regional Mail Bag 113, Cotter<br />

Road, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia. 1957.<br />

FELLOWS, E. S., M.Sc.For., Forest Consultant, P.O. Box 354, Fredericton, New Brunswick,<br />

Canada. 1929.<br />

FIJI FOREST DEPARTMENT, Government 'Buildings, Suva, Fiji. 1952.<br />

FINCH, A. C., M.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, P.O. Box 228, Ndola, Zambia. 1969.<br />

FINLAYSON, W., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), <strong>Forestry</strong> College, Prodromos, Cyprus. 1947.<br />

FISHWICK, R. W., B.Sc.(Wales), S.F. Project 535, F.A.O., Senior Forest Advisor, Rua<br />

Jardin Botanico, 1008-ZC 20, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 1949.<br />

FITCH, P. J., B.Sc.For., Regional Forest Office, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game,<br />

Box 5493, Limbe, Malawi. 1963.<br />

FLATEAU DICK AND COMP'ANY, 9 C'amomile Street, London, E.C.3. 1958.<br />

FLENTJE, W. M., Dip.For.(Cres.),Dip.For.(Oxon), Divisional Forest Office, <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Commission, Victoria, P.O. Box 22, Bendige, Victoria, Australia. 1946.<br />

FLETC'HER TIMBER COMPANY LIMITED, The Managing Director, 'Private Bag,<br />

Auckland, New Zealand. 1970.<br />

FLORENC'E, Dr. R. G., M.Sc.For., Ph.D.(Syd.), Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Australian<br />

National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia. 1970.<br />

FOGGIE, A., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Secretary, Society of Foresters of Great Britain, Newton<br />

House, Freuchie, Fife. 1930.<br />

FORD-RO'BERTSON, F. C., O.B.E., B.Sc., M.A., 54 Staunton Road, Oxford. 1947.<br />

FOREST MANAGEMENT LIMITED, The Managing Director, 3 Scott Road, Glenrothes,<br />

Fife. 1969.<br />

FOREST P'ROD'UCTS RESEARC'H LABORATORY, The Director, Princes Risborough,<br />

Bucks. 1971.<br />

FOULSTONE, M. S., B.Sc., Planning Officer, Devon C.C., 18 Old Tiverton Road,<br />

Crediton, Devon. 1950.<br />

FOX, A. V., B.Sc.For., Provisional Forest Service, Adamawa Province, Yola, North<br />

Eastern State, Nigeria. 1969.<br />

FOX, J. E. D., B.'Sc.,(Hons), M.F., M.Sc., Research Fellowship, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />

University of North Wales, Bangor. 1956.<br />

FRANCIS, D. A., B.Sc., F.S.F., G.B., M.E.F.A., "Grey Friars," Kinsbourne Green,<br />

Harpenden, Herts. 1947.<br />

FRANCIS, J. P., B.Se.For., P.O. Box 1073, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. 1965.<br />

FRANCOIS, J. H., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Conservator of Forests, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department,<br />

P.O. Box 527, Accra, Ghana. 1957.<br />

FRASER, H., B.Sc.(Edin.), Dalelands, Middleton Avenue, Ilkley, Yorks. 1926.<br />

FRITH, A. C., B.Sc.For., clo UNDP Office, Apartado 1424, Santo Domingo, Dominican<br />

Republic. 1947.<br />

FULLER, B. R., B.Sc.(Hons),(Lon.), "Grasmere," West Street, Selsey, Nr. Chichester,<br />

Sussex. 1953.<br />

FURNESS, C. K., B.Sc. Forest Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, P.O. Box 8111, Causeway,<br />

Salisbury, Rhodesia. 1957.<br />

FYFE, A. J., B.Sc., 11 Montpelier Terrace, Edinburgh 10. 1932.<br />

GAMBIA, H.E. The Governor, Government House, Bathurst, Gambia. 1923.<br />

GANE, Dr. M., B.Sc.Econ., M.A., D.Phil., Director, Development Planning Institute,<br />

University of Bradford, Bradford 7, Yorks. 1950.<br />

GARDNER, T. A. M., M.A.(Oxon), Conservator of Forests, P.O. Box 30513, Nairobi,<br />

Kenya. 1957.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 303<br />

HOLMES, J., Chief Training Officer, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Co-operatives,<br />

P.O. Box 2066, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 1954.<br />

HOLTAM, B. W., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), 15 Blacket Avenue, Edinburgh 9. 1949.<br />

HONORE, E. J., B.A.(Oxon), P.O. Box 24718, Karen, Nairobi, Kenya. 1955.<br />

HOPPER, R. L., For.Cert., clo District Forest Office, P.O. Box 3012, Arusha, Tanzania.<br />

1954.<br />

HOPWOOD, L. A., M.Inst., W.Sc., Status, 34 Sackville Street, Piccadilly, London,<br />

WIX 1DB. 1970.<br />

HORNE, J.E.M., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., A.lInf.Sc., Rivendale, Brook Road, Windermere.<br />

1955.<br />

HORSLEY SMITH AND SHERRY LIMITED, Ripple Wharf, River Road, Barking,<br />

Essex. 1964.<br />

HOSIE, Professor R. C., 7 Annesley Avenue, Toronto 17, Ontario, Canada. 1946.<br />

HOWARD, Dr. J. A. C., Ph.D., M.F., B.Sc.(Wales), F.R.E.S., F.L.'S., School of <strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria. Australia. 1947.<br />

HOWARD, W. J., B.Sc.For., Senior Scientific Officer, Land Resources Division, Overseas<br />

Development Administration, 41 Amerland Road, London, S.W.18. 1967.<br />

HOWARD, MESSRS. W. W. BRaS AND COMPANY LIMITED, Howard House,<br />

Lanrick Road, Poplar, London, E.14. 1964.<br />

HOWCROFT, N. H. S., Technical Assistant, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Bulolo, Territory of<br />

Papua and New Guinea. 1966.<br />

HOWELL, B. N., M.A.(Cantab), Spitchwick Manor, Poundsgate, Newton Abbot, Devon.<br />

1971.<br />

HOWELL, J. H., B.Sc.(Hons)For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer F.A.O., clo V.N.D.P., Apartado<br />

Postal 6314, Panama 5, Republic de Panama. 1963.<br />

HOWLAND, P., Dip.For.(Oxon), Research Officer, Forest Research Institute, Federal<br />

Department of Forest Research, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1957.<br />

HOWROYD, C. S., M.A., Forest Department, Sandakan, Sabah. 1950.<br />

HVA SENG SAWMILL COMPANY, Sibu, Sarawak. 1953.<br />

HUBBARD, C. S., O.B.E., B.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, P.O. Malkerns, SwaziIand. 1935.<br />

HUGHES, J. F., B.Sc., B.A., Dip.Ed., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1949.<br />

HUMMEL, Dr. F. C., M.A., D.Phil., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, 25 Savile Row, London,<br />

W.1. 1938.<br />

HUNT, L. G., clo Junior Carlton Club, Pall Mall, London, S.W.l. 1951.<br />

HUSSEY, T. W., B.A.(Oxon), Box Tree Cottage, Launcherley, Nr. Wells, Somerset. 1947.<br />

HYNDMAN-STEIN, A., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., clo Lloyds Bank Ltd., Cox's and King's<br />

Branch, P.O. Box 220, 6 Pall Mall, London, S.W.l. 1924.<br />

HYNE, J. R. L., Managing Director, Hyne and Son Pty. Ltd., P.O. Box 106, Maryborough,<br />

Queensland, Australia. 1951.<br />

HYDERABAD AND BERAR, H.E.H. The Nizam of Hyderabad and Berar, G.C.S.I.,<br />

King Kothi, Hyderabad, (Deccan), India. 1921.<br />

IMPERIAL TOBACCO GROUP LIMITED, Imperial House, 1 Grosvenor Square,<br />

London, WIX 6LJ. 1922.<br />

INCHBOLD-STEVENS, S. H., B.Sc.For. Zambia Forest College, Private Bag, Mwekera,<br />

Kitwe, Zambia. 1964.<br />

INDIA: FOREST UTILISATION DEPARTMENT, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. India.<br />

1964.<br />

INDIA: DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, CHANDIGARH, The Chief Conservator,<br />

Haryana, Chandigarh, India. 1967.<br />

INDIA, DEHRA DUN, The President, Forest Research Institue and Colleges, Dehra<br />

Dun, (U.P.) India. 1925.<br />

INDIA, Conservator of Forests, Hoshangabad Circle, Hoshangabad, M.P., India. 1965.<br />

INDIA: Chief Conservator of Forests, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. 1968.<br />

INDIA, Chief Conservator of Forests, Madras 6, India. 1969.<br />

INDIA, Conservator-General, Bengal Forest Department, Writers' Building, Calcutta,<br />

Bengal, India. 1945.<br />

INDIA: SOUTHERN FOREST RANGERS COLLEGE, Post Box No. 731, Coimbatore-2,<br />

India. 1931.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 305<br />

KEIGHLEY, G. D., B.Sc.(Edin.), <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Priestley Road, Basingstoke,<br />

Hants. 1944.<br />

KEMP, R. H., B.A.(Cantab.), B.A.(Oxon), Senior Research Officer, Comnl0n\vealth<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1970.<br />

KENNEDY, J. D., M.B.E., Dip.For(Oxon), Elmside, 10 Weststuart Road, Hawick. 1924.<br />

KENWORTHY, A., A.M.1.W.Sc., Fallowfield, 226 Holtye Road, East Grinstead. 1952.<br />

KERFOOT, 0., B.Sc.(Hons.), M.A.(Oxon), Department of Botany, University of the<br />

Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 1962.<br />

KERMANI, W. A., B.Sc.(Hons)(Alig.), B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Chief Conservator of Forests,<br />

Sind Region, Thandi Sarak, Hyderabad, West Pakistan. 1947.<br />

KESSEL, S. L., M.Sc., Dip.For., Company Director, Australian Ne\vsprint Mills (Pty.)<br />

Ltd., 3 Monomeath Avenue, Toorak S.E.2, Victoria, Australia. 1922.<br />

KEW: The Director, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey. 1923.<br />

KHAN, F. M., B.Sc.Agr., B.Sc.For., M.S., Divisional Forest Officer, Aerial Forest<br />

Inventory Service, Peshawar, West Pakistan. 1966.<br />

KHANNA, I. D., Thapparnagar, P.O. Meerut City, D.P., India. 1925.<br />

KHAN, M. 1. R., M.Sc., M.F.(Hons.), A.I.F.C., Dip.For., Joint Secretary of Forests<br />

Punjab, Agriculture Department, 51 13 Lawrence Road, Lahore 3, W. Pakistan. 1946.<br />

KHAN, N., Forest Guard, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department Labasa, Fiji. 1971.<br />

KILEO, G. J., B Sc.(Hons.)(Lond.), B.Sc.(Hons.)For.(Wales), Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Forest<br />

Division, P.O. Box 426, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 1965.<br />

KIMATHI, T. M., P.O. Box 395, Nyeri, Kenya. 1970.<br />

KINLOCH, D., B.Sc.(Edin.), 125 Lady Nairn Avenue, Kirkcaldy, Fife. 1933.<br />

KINLOCH, J. B., B.Sc., Silviculturist, San Carios, Rio San Juan, Nicaragua, Central<br />

America. 1932.<br />

KIO, P. R. 0., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1963.<br />

KIPLING, T. H., B.A., 93 Edgar Road, Winchester, Hants. 1960.<br />

KIRBY, Major H. L., M.C., Dip.For.(Edin.), I.F.S.(retd.), clo National and Grindlays<br />

Bank Ltd., 13 S1. James's Square, London, S.W.1. 1929.<br />

KIRKUP, A., Chairman, Northern <strong>Forestry</strong> Products Ltd., Middleton Hall, Wooler,<br />

Northumberland. 1947.<br />

KITCHINGMAN, G. D., M.A.(Oxon), I.F.S.(retd.), Pelharn, Chideock, Nr. Bridport,<br />

Dorset. 1921.<br />

KIWANUKA, L. S. K., Forest Ranger, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />

Uganda. 1959.<br />

KNEBEL, A. M., B.Sc.For., Forestal Cottage, Westmarch Ash, Nr. Canterbury. 1948.<br />

KNUDSON, Dr. D. M., B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of<br />

Fore8try, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A. 1962.<br />

KONG THAI (1963) LIMITED, P.O. Box 297, Sibu, Sarawak. 1953.<br />

KORODRAV, K., Forester, Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1961.<br />

KRISHNA KUMARSINHJI, H.l-I. The Maharaja Krishna Kumarsinhji, K.C.S.I., The<br />

Palace, Bhavnagar, Bombay, India. 1922.<br />

LAHIRI, K. L., 6B Bright Street, Calcutta 19, Bengal, India. 1959.<br />

LAMB, A. F. A., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., Senior Research Officer, <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest<br />

Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1930.<br />

'LAMB, K. M., B.Sc.For., 105 Waimairi Road, Christchurch 4, New Zealand. 1952.<br />

LAMB, M. C., Managing Director, Coast Timbers Ltd., 184 New Kings Road, Fulham,<br />

London., S.W.6. 1966.<br />

LAMBERT, H. G., Editor World Wood, 6306 S.W. 39th Avenue, Portland Oregon,<br />

97221, V.S.A. 1969.<br />

LANCASTER, P. C., O.B.E., M.A.(Oxon), 46 Grange Road, Bishops Stortford, Herts.<br />

1930.<br />

LANG-BROWN, J., B.A.(Bot.), B.A.(For.), M.A.(Oxon), Wheelwrights Cottage, Brewham<br />

Lodge, Bruton, Somerset. 1956.<br />

LANGLEY, R., B.Sc.For.(Wales), clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Paslow Building Belize<br />

City, British Honduras. 1960. '<br />

LATRAM, E. Bryan, C.B.E., !\1.M., Vice President C.F.A., Trebartha House, Nr.<br />

Launceston, Cornwall. 1944.<br />

LATHAM, C. G. A., M.A., A.C.A., Messrs. James Latham Ltd., Leeside Wharf, Clapton,<br />

London, E.5. 1965.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 307<br />

LOGAN, W. E. M., O.B.E., B.A.(Oxon), Little Piggots, North Dean, High Wycombe,<br />

Bucks. 1947.<br />

LOWE, Dr. R. G., M.A.(Cantab.), B.Sc.(Oxon), Ph.D., Principal Research Officer,<br />

Federal Department of Forest Research, P.M.B. 5054, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1957.<br />

LOWETH, A. N., B.Sc.For.(Wales), Deputy Conse,rvator of Forests, Forest Dept., Suva,<br />

Fiji. 1948.<br />

LUSHINGTON, J. R. F., Forest Department, P.O. Box 426, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.<br />

1956.<br />

LYSAGHT, J. F., B.Sc.For., Working Plans Officer, clo Box 15096, Wellington 4, New<br />

Zealand. 1945.<br />

LYSHOLM, G., Forest Research Officer, P.O. Box 95, Lushoto, Tanzania. 1970.<br />

MACALPINE, R. I., B.Sc., IFS(retd.), IT.A. Bungalow, Nagrakalta p.a., Dooars, West<br />

Bengal, India. 1939.<br />

McCANN, J. C., B.Sc.(Hons)For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Urbenville, New South Wales, 2475,<br />

Australia. 1971.<br />

MACARTHUR, R., B.A.(Hons.)(Oxon), Spring Creek, Blenheim, New Zealand. 1947.<br />

McCARTHY, R. B., B.Sc.For., Dip.For., Manage'ment Officer, Department of Forests,<br />

P.O. Box 5055, Boroko, Papua and New Guinea. 1970.<br />

MACCOLL, Major H. H., M.C., IFS(retd.), 16 Steels Road, Hampstead, London, N.W.3.<br />

1925.<br />

MACDONALD, A. A., M.A.(Oxon), Walpole House, Stansted, Essex. 1954.<br />

McDONALD, H., B.Sc.For.(Syd.), D.F.(Canb.), clo Resident Representative, U.N.T.A.B.,<br />

Office, C.P.O. Box 143, Seoul, Korea. 1955.<br />

McDONALD, 1, Dip.For.(Cres.), <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, State Electricity Commission, 11<br />

Jeeralong Crescent, Yallourn, Victoria, Australia. 1954.<br />

MACDONALD, J. A. B., O.B.E., Dip.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Greystone Park, Moffat<br />

Road, Dumfries. 1950.<br />

McDONALD, P. G., Divisional Forest Office, P.O. Box 8, Thomson's Falls, Kenya. 1967.<br />

McELDERRY, J. C. K., B.A.For., M.A.(Oxon), Torbryan Mill, Poole Cross, Ipplepen.,<br />

Newton Abbot, Devon. 1937.<br />

MACGREGOR, W. D., C.B.E., B.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, Kiltane, Dunblane, Perthshire.<br />

1927.<br />

McINTOSH, D., B.Sc.(Edin.), "Heavers," Ryarsh, Maidstone, Kent. 1930.<br />

McINTOSH, D. H., B.Sc.For., Regional Forest Officer, Department of Forests, Konedobu,<br />

New Guinea. 1960.<br />

McINTYRE, H., Box 923, Durban, Natal, South Africa. 1925.<br />

MACKAY, J. S., Hon. Sec. West Otago Farm <strong>Forestry</strong> Association, "Montana," Heriot,<br />

West Otago, New Zealand. 1964.<br />

McKEE, R. G., B.S.F., 954 Terrace Avenue, Victoria, B.C., Canada. 1962.<br />

MacKELLAR, A. J., B.Sc., Box 84, Pietermaritzburg, Natal, South Africa. 1962.<br />

McKELVEY, Professor P. J., B.Sc.(N.Z.), B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Canterbury<br />

University, Christchurch, New Zealand. 1966.<br />

MACKENZIE, J. A., B.Sc., M.Sc., Department of Agricultural 'Biology, University of<br />

Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1962.<br />

McKERLIE, J. E., B.Sc.For.&Bot., Provincial Forest Office, p.a. Box 63, Mbeya,<br />

Southern Highlands Province, Tanzania. 1958.<br />

McKINNON, A. D., B.Sc.For., 58 Tamatea Road, Taupo, New Zealand. 1947.<br />

MacLENNAN, H. G., Box 22, R.R.1., Vankleek Hill, Ontario, Canada. 1966.<br />

McLINDEN, D. T., 93 Stanley Road, Folkestone, Kent. 1950.<br />

MacMILLAN, H. R., C.C., C.B.E., Graduate Forester, 1075 West Georgia Street, 26th<br />

Floor, Vancouver 5, D.C., Canada. 1945.<br />

MACMILLAN BLOEDEL LIMITED, <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada.- 1963.<br />

McNEILL, W. M., M.B.E., T.D., M.A., M.S., Dane Lodge, 4 Royfold Crescent,<br />

Aberde,en. 1924.<br />

McVEIGH, J., F.A.O., Forest Officer, clo Conservator of Forests, Porest Department,<br />

Suva, Fiji. 1961.<br />

MABONGA-MWISAKA, J. M., B.Sc.For., Forest Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />

Uganda. 1961.<br />

MAHAPATRA, B. C., Provincial Forest Office, p.a. Mubi, North East State, Nigeria.<br />

1970.


308 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

MAKONGO, D. }{., Assistant Forester, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism,<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Division, P.O. Box 671, Bukoba, Tanzania. 1971.<br />

MALAWI FOREST SCHOOL, Private Bag 6, Dedza, Malawi. 1963.<br />

MALLAM, J. C., Three Ways, Ublcy, Bristol, Somerset. 1930.<br />

MALLINSON, Colonel Sir C. Stuart, C.B.E., D.S.O., M.C., J.P., D.L., The White House,<br />

Woodford Green, Essex. 1922.<br />

MALLINSON, Messrs. William and Sons, 130 Hackney Road, London, E.2. 1922.<br />

MANGAN, P. G., 3000 South 80th Street, West Allis, Wisconsin, 53219, U.S.A. 1970.<br />

MANNING SEED C01\1PANY, 11206 Bridge Port Way, Tacoma, Washington, 98499,<br />

U.S.A. 1953.<br />

MARCANO, A. R., Apartado de Carreos No. 60, Barinas Edo, Barinas, Venezuela. 1962.<br />

MARCH, E. W., M.A., 87 Harnham Road, Salisbury, Wilts. 1932.<br />

MARSH, D. E. M., B.Sc.For., J.P., 21 High Street, Sharnbrook, Beds. 1950.<br />

MARSH, E. K., B.A.(Cape.), M.A.For.(Oxon), Chief Research Officer, Forest Research<br />

Institute, P.O. Box 727, Pretoria, South Africa. 1935.<br />

MARSHALL, H. G. W., clo Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of British Columbia,<br />

Vancouver 8, B.C., Canada. 1960.<br />

MARSHALL, W. E., U.N. }(orean Forest Survey and Development Project, P.O. Box<br />

36, Suwon, I(yonggi-Do., Korea. 1947.<br />

MARSHALL, W. G., 122 Winchmore Hill Road, Southgate, London, N.14. 1934.<br />

MARTEN, K. D., B.Sc.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Munda, British Solomon Islands,<br />

Protectorate. 1969.<br />

MASIREWA, J., Forester, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Lautoka, Fiji. 1971.<br />

MASON, C. G. W., M.Sc., F.N.Z.I.C., A.N.I.C., A.M.I.Chem.E., New Zealand Forest<br />

Service, P.O. Box 875, Wellington, New Zealand 1959.<br />

MASON, P. F., B.A.For.(Oxon), Dip.Anth.(Oxon), 11 Connaught House, Connaught<br />

Avenue, Frinton-on-Sea, Essex. 1939.<br />

MASSON, J., G.M., B.Sc.For., 3 Firth Crescent, Trumpethill, Gourock, Renfrewshire.<br />

1950.<br />

MATTHEWS, Professor J. D., B.Sc.For., F.S.For., F.R.S,E., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />

University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen. 1950.<br />

MATTHEWS, P. K .. , B.Sc.Hons.(Bang.), M.Sc.(NB), 30 Well Street, Moffat, Dunfriesshire.<br />

1962.<br />

MATfJUR, R. B., Silviculturist, (Sal. Region), Uttar Pradewh, India. 1971.<br />

MAURITIUS FOREST DEPARTMENT, The Private Secretary, H.E. The Governor,<br />

Government House, Mauritius. 1923.<br />

MAXWELL-MACDONALD, J., B.A.For.(Oxon), Gortinanane, Tayinloan, Argyll. 1933.<br />

MAYHEAD, Dr. G. J., B.Sc., Ph.D., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission Research Station, Alice Holt<br />

Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey. 1964.<br />

MBURU, 0., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), C.C.F. Forest Department, P.O. Box 30513, Nairobi,<br />

Kenya. 1967.<br />

MEIKLEJDHN, W., C.I.E., B.Sc.(Edin.), F.R.C.S., IFS(retd.), Falaise, Avenue du Petit<br />

Mont, Mount Bingham, Jersey, Channel Islands. 1930.<br />

MERVART, Dr. J. A., B.Sc., Ph.D., F.A.D. <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, Federal Department of<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong>, P.M.B. 5011, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1971.<br />

MICHAEL, D., Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1960.<br />

MIDHOLI, D., B.Sc., Forest Department, P.D. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda. 1951.<br />

MILLER, Dr. H. G., B.Sc.(Hons.)For., Ph.D., Senior Scientific Officer, Pest and Forest'<br />

Soils Section, Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Carigiebuckler, Aberdeen<br />

AB9 2QJ. 1964.<br />

MILLER, R. G., B.Sc., Forest Research Institute, Canberra, A.C.T. 2600, Australia. 1931.<br />

MILLER, W. A., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Chief Forester and General Manager, Messrs. Bryant<br />

& May (<strong>Forestry</strong>) Ltd., 23 Biddenham Turn, Bedford. 1937.<br />

MILNER, K., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), British Columbia Forest Service, Prince Rupert, B.C.,<br />

Canada. 1955.<br />

MINCHIN, A. A. F., Dip.For.(Oxon), Cruxfield House, Near Duns, Berwick. 1971.<br />

MISHRA, B., B.Sc.Hons., Dip.For., Provincial Forest Officer, Adamawa Province, Vola,<br />

North East State, Nigeria. 1970.<br />

MITCHELL, A. J. L., B.Sc.For., 12 St. Edmunds Gate, Attleborough, Norfolk. 1953.<br />

MITCHELL, . B. A., B.Sc.For.&Bot.(Wales), Southern Regional Station, Forest Research<br />

InstItute, Mount Gambier, P.O. Box 946, South Australia. 1950.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 309<br />

MITCHELL, W. B. G., B.Sc..For., Dinmont, Tullibardine Crescent, Auchterarder,<br />

Perthshire. 1927.<br />

MOBBS, Professor E. C., C.B.E., M.A., B.Sc., F.S.F., IFS(retd.), 3 Kennedy Road,<br />

Napier, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. 1930.<br />

MOHD. DARUS BIN MAHMUD, Forest De'partment, Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia.<br />

1962.<br />

MOHAMAD NOR BIN Y AACOB, B.Sc.For.(Syd.), State Forest Officer, Pahang, West<br />

Malaysia. 1958.<br />

MORD. YAKIN BIN LONG, Forest Department Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1948.<br />

MOIZ, YOOSUF AND COMPANY (S'PORE) LIMITED, 4 Ampang Street, 1st Floor,<br />

Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1965.<br />

MOODY, B. H., Forest Department, P.O. Box 181, Belize, British Honduras. 1962.<br />

MOONEY, J. W. C., M.A.(Oxon), English Forest Association Limited, Woodcote Road,<br />

Caversham, Reading. 1949.<br />

MOORE, D., B.Sc.(Edin.), F.A.O. Forest Adviser, Apartado de Correos 824F, Caracas,<br />

Venezuela. 1954.<br />

·MORGAN, R. G., P.O. Box 8 Putururu, New Zealand. 1948.<br />

MORRISON, Dr. I. K., B.Sc.For., M.Sc.For., Ph.D., Research Scientist, 4 Huntington<br />

Part, Apt. 11, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada. 1971.<br />

MORRISON, K. R., Assoc.Dip.For.(Cres.), District Forester, Forest Commission,<br />

Marysville, Victoria, Australia. 1960.<br />

MORS, L. S., B.Sc.(Syd.), D.F.(Canb.), Queen Street, Oberon, New South Wales,<br />

Australia. 1955.<br />

MOSS, A., B.Sc., B.e.R.F., Woodlands Manager, Messrs. S. W. Simpson Ltd., 2500<br />

Abbott Street, Kelowna, B.C., Canada. 1947.<br />

MOSTYN, H. P., B.Sc.For.(Bang.), Romalee, 9 Park Chase, Guildford, Surrey. 1951.<br />

MUIR, W. D., M.A., Dip.For., 7 Minnamurra Road, Northbridge 2063, New South<br />

Wales, Australia. 1929.<br />

MUKAH SAWMILL (1962) LIMITED, 21 Wing Nai Siong Road, P.O. Box 451, Sibu,<br />

Sarawak. 1966.<br />

MULLIN, L. J., Dip.For., John Meikle Forest Research Station, P. Bag 76G,<br />

Penhalonga, Rhodesia. 1957.<br />

MUNDY, T., Messrs. T. Mundy (Timbers) Limited, (Hardwoods), 70 Queen Victoria<br />

Street, London, E.C.4. 1949.<br />

MUNRO, BRICE AND COMPANY LIMITED, Royal Liver Building, Liverpool 3.<br />

1965.<br />

MURRAY, C. H., M.A.(Oxon), F.A.O. Forest Division, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome,<br />

Italy. 1961.<br />

MURRAY, G. St. C., F.R.S.A., 11 Manor Place, Edinburgh 3. 1948.<br />

MURTLAND, R., B.Sc.For., M.Sc., 9 Colville' Place, Aberdeen. 1967.<br />

MUSTAFFA BIN MUDA, Forest Department, Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1965.<br />

MUTAZZIBWAWO, Y., Forest Ranger, Forest Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />

Uganda. 1950.<br />

MUTHOO, Dr. M. K., B.Sc.(J.&K.), Ph.D., Planning Department, 166 Karan Nagar,<br />

Srinagar, Kashmir, India. 1959.<br />

MYSORE, Major-General Sir S. J. Wadiyar Bahadur, G.C.B., G.C.S.I, LL.D., His Highness<br />

The Maharaja Rajapramukh of Mysore, The Palace, Mysore City, South India.<br />

1951.<br />

NALUSWA, J. T., M.Sc., Dip.lng.For., Forest Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />

Uganda. 1970.<br />

NAMASIVAYAM, M., M.A.(Oxon), Forest Specialist, Asian Development Bank, Commercial<br />

Center, P.O. Box 126, Makati, Rizal D-708, Philippines. 1947.<br />

NASH, C. A. M., M.B.E., B.Sc.For.(Aber), P.O. Box 10, Honiara, British Solomon<br />

Islands. 1953.<br />

NDEGWA, D. T., Divisional Forest Office', P.O. Box 99, Kitale, Kenya. 1971.<br />

NDOLERIRE, F. K., Forest Ranger, Forest Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />

Uganda. 1956.<br />

NEILSON, J. R., M.A.(Oxon), 62 Grappenhall Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington. 1946.<br />

NEPAL FOREST RESOURCES SURVEY OFFICE, Survey Chief, 21/31, Ram Shah<br />

Path, Kathmandu, Nepal. 1968.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 313<br />

REDMOND, Dr. D. R., D.F.C., B.Sc.F., M.F., Ph.D., Scientific Adviser, Department of<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> and Rural Development, 161 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa 4, Ontario,<br />

Canada. 1962.<br />

REECE, P. 0., A.M.I.C.E., M.I.Struct.E., A.M.I.Mun.E., F.I.W.Sc., Powell Duffryn<br />

Timber Holdings Ltd., Powell DufIryn House, 19 'Berkeley Street, London, W.l. 1951.<br />

REES, T. I., B.Se.Agri. & For.(Wales), Project Manager, U.N.D.P./F.A.O./Special Fund,<br />

Forest Development and Watershed Management Project, 2 South Odeon Avenue,<br />

Kingston 10, Jamaica, West Indies. 1947.<br />

REEVE, R. W., Clifton Cottage, Stoke Ferry, Norfolk. 1951.<br />

REGAN, E. L., Dip.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of New South Wales, Assembly Hall,<br />

Margaret Street, P.O. Box 2667, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 1950.<br />

REICHEL, R. J., B.Sc.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Forest Office" Bellangry, New South<br />

Wales 2446, Australia. 1970. .<br />

REID, P. R., B.Se.For., S.A.C.F., Forest Management Officer, H.Q., Ministry of Natural<br />

Resources, <strong>Forestry</strong> Division,'Maiduguri, N.E. State, Nigeria. 1970.<br />

RENDLE, B. J., B.Se., A.R.C.S., F.L.S., F.I.W.Sc., Glebe Cottage, Horsenden, Aylesbury,<br />

Bucks. 1928.<br />

RHODESIA NATIVE TIMBER CONCESSIONS LIMITED, Box 567, Bulawayo,<br />

Rhodesia. 1940.<br />

RICHARDS, Dr. B. N., B.Sc.For., Ph.D., Dip.For., Senior Lecturer in Botany, University<br />

of New England, 21 College Avenue, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.<br />

1965.<br />

RICHARDSON, J., B.Se.(Hons.)For., Canadian Forest Service, P.O. Box 6028, St. John's<br />

Newfoundland, Canada. 1968.<br />

RICIIARDSON, Professor S. D., M.A., B.Sc., D.Phil.(Oxon), <strong>Forestry</strong> Department,<br />

University College of North Wales, Bangor, Caerns. 1960.<br />

RICHMOND, P. C., For. Cert., Dip.For., clo Forests Department, Box 366, Kalgoorlie,<br />

Western Australia 6430. 1951.<br />

RIDDOCH, J., C.B.E., Box 40, Kisumu, Kenya, 1949.<br />

RIVARD, F., B.A., F.E. & Q.L.S.Hons.(Que), Chief Forest Engineer, Canadian International<br />

Paper Company, 1540 Sun Life Building, Montreal 2 P.Q., Canada. 1956.<br />

ROBERTS, R. W., B.Se.For., 6423 Brooke Street, Vancouver 16, British Columbia,<br />

Canada. 1971.<br />

ROBERTSON, I. J. M., B.Se.(Edin), M.Sc., 54 Highburgh Drive, Burnside, Rutherglen,<br />

Glasgow. 1961.<br />

ROBSON, M., B.Se., 14a Greenhill Terrace, Edinburgh 10. 1931.<br />

ROCHE, Dr. L., B.Agr.For., M.A., M.F., Ph.D., Laurentian Forest Research Centre,<br />

Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.O. Box 3800, Ste Foy, P.Q., Canada. 1967.<br />

RODGER, G. l., B.Se.For., 38 Lynington Street, Tusmore, South Australia 5065. 1929.<br />

RODRIGUEZ, Eng.For.R., Carmen a Puente Arauca, Residencia "El Carmen," Apt. 42,<br />

Caracas, Venezuela. 1970.<br />

ROGERS, M. T., B.Se.(Hons)For., The Marches, Chelveston-eum-Caldecott, Wellingborough,<br />

Northants. 1962.<br />

ROSS, J. K., B.Sc.For.(Edin), <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, CoIn Cottage, Bibury, Cirencester,<br />

Glos. 1946.<br />

ROWAN, G. W., Port Durnford Plantation, P.O. Fleixton, Natal, South Africa. 1937.<br />

ROWE, R. D. H., B.Sc.For.(Wales), F.A.O./World Bank Co-operative Programme, Via<br />

delle Terme di Caraealla, Rome, Italy. 1970.<br />

ROWLAND, L., O.B.E., Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> Grosvenor Estates, Hoseley House, Gresford,<br />

Nr. Wrexham, Denbighshire'. 1951.<br />

ROXBURGH, A. L., D.Se., 32 D'arres Road, Ponteland, Neweastle-upon-Tyne. 1953.<br />

ROYAL COMMONWEALTH SOCIETY, 18 Northumberland Avenue, London, W.C.2.<br />

1923.<br />

ROYAL FORESTRY SOCIETY OF ENGLAND, WALES AND, NORTHER,N IRE­<br />

LAND, 102 'High Street, 'rring, 'Herts. 1922.<br />

RUKUBA, M.L.S.B., B.Sc.For., Forest Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda.<br />

1953.<br />

RYAN, P., B.Se.For., Department of Forests, Konedobu, Papu. 1967.<br />

RYLE, G. B., C.B.E., Dip.For.(Oxon), F.S.For., The White Cottage, Bank, Lyndhurst,<br />

Hants, S04 7FD. 1930.<br />

3


314 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

SABAH FORESTRY DEPARTMENT, P.O. Box 311, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia.<br />

1953.<br />

SABAH TIMBER COMPANY LIMITED, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. 1953.<br />

SACHTLER, Dr. M., Naciones Unidas, Apartado 1424, Santo Domingo, Republic of<br />

Dominica. 1969.<br />

ST. LUCIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOREST SERVICES,<br />

Castries, St. Lucia, Windward Islands, West Indies. 1952.<br />

SAFO, E. K., Forester, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Training School, P.O. Box 31, Sunyani, Ghana.<br />

1958.<br />

SALE, G. N., B.Sc.For.(Edin), "Avrion," Heathlands Road, Wokingham, Berks. 1924.<br />

SALTER, B. R., B.A.(Oxon), Underbridge Cottage, Higher Walton, Via Warrington,<br />

Lancs. 1962.<br />

SAMLER, W. H. G., M.A., Dip.For.(Oxon), 39 Bloomfield Park, Bath, BA2 2BX,<br />

Somerset. 1926.<br />

SANDERS, M., B.Sc.For.(Edin), B.Sc.Est.Man., 38 Kenmere Avenue, P.O. Box 491,<br />

Ndola, Zambia. 1947.<br />

SANGSTER, R. G., C.B.E., B.Sc.For., Scottish Woodlands Owners Association, 26 Mur..<br />

rayfield Drive, Edinburgh, EH12 6EB. 1935.<br />

SARAWAK FOREST DEPARTMENT, Kuching, Sarawak. 1958.<br />

SARAWAK UNITED SAWMILLS LIMITED, P.O. Box 143, 13 Island Road, Sibu,<br />

Sarawak, Malaysia. 1957.<br />

SARGENT, K., O.B.E., B.Sc., Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Development and<br />

Planning, P.O. Box 174, Zomba, Malawi. 1944.<br />

SARKI, Y. B., B.Sc.For., Ministry of Natural Resources, P.M.B. 2103, Kaduna, Nigeria.<br />

1956.<br />

SAVILL, P. S., B.Sc., District Forest Officer, Whiterock, Killinchy, Co. Down, Northern<br />

Ireland. 1965.<br />

SAVERS, Major R. J., Dip.For.(Cantab), I.F.S.(retd.), <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, Bryanston<br />

Cottage, Blandford, Dorset. 1929.<br />

SCHULTZ, C. D., B.A., B.Sc., M.E.I.C., M.C.I.F., B.C.R.F., 325 Howe Street, Van..<br />

couver 1, British Columbia, Canada. 1943.<br />

SCOTTISH WOODLAND OWNERS' ASSOCIATION LIMITED, 6 Chester Street,<br />

Edinburgh 3. 1954.<br />

SCOTT, J. S., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), Dip.Ed., Principal, Thornton School, Cross House, KiI..<br />

marnock, Ayrshire. 1957.<br />

SCOlT McBRIDE, J., B.Sc.F., B.A.Sc., P.Eng., Scarsdale, Penn Road, Beaconsfield,<br />

Bucks. 1969.<br />

SCOTTISH PULP AND PAPER MILLS, Royal Bank Buildings, Fort William, Inverness-shire.<br />

1958.<br />

SEARLE, Mrs. C. M. M., Fairfield, 115 Banbury Road, Oxford. 1964.<br />

SEELY, H. E., B.Sc.F.(N.B.), 214 Latchford Road, Ottawa 3, Ontario, Canada. 1935.<br />

SEIN GYI, Yedwin-Yegan, Myaungmya, Burma. 1929.<br />

SELBY, R., B.Se., 21a John Street, Luton, Beds. 1970.<br />

SETROPA (BUITENWEG AND COMPANY), P.O. Box 203, BUSSUffi, Holland. 1971.<br />

SEVASTOS, C., Senior <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer-Economist, 4 Fokides Street, Athens, Greece.<br />

1964.<br />

SHAKESPEARE, E., M.I.L., For.Cert.(U.K.), Alvord Institute, P.Bag 9181, Fort Victoria,<br />

Rhodesia. 1957.<br />

SHEDLEY, P. N., B.Sc.For., clo Lauri Timber Company Limited, Nannup, Western<br />

Australia. 1957.<br />

SHEPHERD, Dr. K. R., B.Sc.F.(Syd.), Dip.For.(Canb.), Ph.D., Australian National<br />

University, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia, 1954.<br />

SHERWIN, I. M., M.A., Seaforest Industries Limited, 605 Courtney Street, Victoria,<br />

British Columbia, Canada. 1953.<br />

SHIRIMA, D. U., Assistant Forester, P.O. Box 26, Tabora, Tanzania. 1970.<br />

SHRUBSHALL, E. J., B.Se.Hons., Knowle House, Knowle St. Giles, Nr. Chard,<br />

Somerset. 1927.<br />

SIM, D., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), Dip.Ed., Uganda Forest School, Nyabyeya, P.O. Masindi,<br />

Uganda. 1950.<br />

SIMPFENDORFER, K. 1., M.Sc.For., DipI.For.(Vic.), Forests Commission, 453 Latrobe<br />

Street, Melbourne C., Victoria, Australia. 1958.


SECTION 1. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 317<br />

TAUPO TOTARA TIMBER COMPANY LIMITED, P.O. Box 190, Putaruru, New<br />

Zealand. 1969.<br />

TAYLOR, S. A., Forest Office, P.M.B. 5053, lbadan, Nigeria. 1962.<br />

TAYLOR, C., 19 Murdieston Street, Greenock, Renfrewshire. 1970.<br />

TAYLOR, Dr. C. J., M.B.E., E.D., B.Se., Ph.D., F.R.S.E., Director of Studies, Edinburgh<br />

University, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, 10 Cluny Gardens, Edinburgh 10. 1937.<br />

TEMESI, T., Forest Guard, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Suva, Fiji. 1970.<br />

TEM,PLE-PERKINS, E. A., F.O., clo Fisheries Department Bag, P.O. Lake Katwe,<br />

Toro, Uganda. 1954.<br />

T'ESHA, P. V., B.Sc.H'ons.For.(Wales), clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, P.O. Box 426, Dar es<br />

Salaam, Tanzania!. 1965.<br />

THESEN (RHODEiSIAS) PTY. LIMITED, P.O. Box 108, Umtali, ,Rhodesia. 1954.<br />

THIRGOOD, Dr. J. V., B.Se.For.Bot., M.F., Ph.D., M.Sc.F., Associate Professor,<br />

Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, British Columbia,<br />

Canada. 1949.<br />

THOM, J. R., B.'Sc.For.(Edin), Project Manager, UNDP., P.O. Box 32, 71000 Serajevo,<br />

Yugoslavia. 1949.<br />

THOMAS, A. V., M.B.E., B.Sc., M.Eng., "Vivemos," Off Kappara Lane, Ms:erah,<br />

Malta, G.C. 1937.<br />

THOMAS, 1., B.'Sc., Dip.For., Woods and Forests Department, Government Offices,<br />

Rundle Street, Adelaide, South Australia. 1946.<br />

THOM'PSON, B.R., Dip.For., Erin Forest, P.O., Juliasdale, Rhodesia. 1963.<br />

THOMSON, A. P., B.Sc.F'or.(N.Z.), Director-General Forests, New Zealand Forest<br />

Service, Private Bag, Wellington, New Zealend. 1936.<br />

THOMSON, M. G., M.Sc., B.S.A., B.C.R.F., 2226 West 35th Street, Vancouver 13, British<br />

Columbia, Canada. 1946.<br />

TILBROOK, E. M., M.A.(Oxon), B.Sc.(S.A.), clo Forest Department, P.O. Box 805,<br />

Ndola, Zambia. 1955.<br />

TILNEY-BASSETf, H. A. E., B.Sc.For.(Edin), District Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> C'ommission,<br />

286 High Street, Lincoln. 1949.<br />

TIMBER RESEAR'CH AND DEVE,LOlp'MENT A,SSOCIATI'O'N LIMITED, Hughenden<br />

Valley, High Wycombe, Bucks. 1945.<br />

TIMMIS, R., 'B.Sc.For., clo Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of British Columbia, Vancouver<br />

8, B.C., Canada. 1963.<br />

TIMSALES, P.O. Box 18080, Nairobi, Kenya. 1952.<br />

TIWAR\I, K. P., B.Sc., A.I.E.C., Assistant Conservator of Forests, Hoshangabad Forest<br />

Division, Hoshangabad, M.P., India. 1965.<br />

TOLEMAN, R. D. L., B.Sc.(Hons)For., Assistant Site Survey Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission,<br />

Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian. 1962.<br />

TOOL,SIE PERSAUD, The Director, 1-4 Lombard Street, Georgetown, Guyana. 1966.<br />

TORRES, R. Lombo, Ingeniero Forestal, Apartado Aereo No.13350, Bogota D.E.,<br />

C'olombia, South America. 1963.<br />

TOWNSEND, K. N. V., D.F.M., B.Sc.(Edin), E.D., District Forest Officer, Glengarry,<br />

Beechcroft Terrace, Insch, Aberdeenshire. 1947.<br />

TRANSVAA'L AND OR\ANG'E FREE STATE CHAMBER OF M'INES, Biological &<br />

Chemical Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 809, Johannesburg, South Africa. 1927.<br />

TRAVERS, W. W. G., B.A.(Oxon), B.Sc., clo Weyerhauser (Aust.) Pty. Ltd., P.O. Box<br />

75, Homebush, New South Wales 2.40, Australia. 1959.<br />

TRENAMAN, K. W., M.A.(Oxon), Chief <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, Forest Department, Honiara,<br />

British Solomon Islands. 1950.<br />

TREVELYAlN, J. F., B.Se.For., R.D.3., Te Puke, New Zealand. 1960.<br />

TRINfDAD AND TOBAGO FOREST DEPARTMENT, The Conservator of Forests,<br />

Port of Spain, Trinidad. 1934.<br />

TRINI'DAD, University College of the West Indies, Faculty of Agriculture, S1. Augustine,<br />

Trinidad, West Indies. 1923.<br />

TUCKWELL, E. C., B.Sc.For., Dip.For.fCanb), Senior Forest Officer, Department of<br />

Forests, Rabaul, T.P.N.G. 1960.<br />

TURNER, A. R., B.Sc.For.(Tor), 720 Evelyn Drive, West Vancouver, British Columbia,<br />

Canada. 1949.<br />

TURNER, B., B.-Se.For., Dip.For., M.F., D.For., 109 Ferguson Building, University<br />

Park, Pat 16802, U.S.A. 1960.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 319<br />

WARREN, Professor H. V., B.A., 'B.Sc., Ph.D., F.R.S.(Can.), 1816 Western Parkway,<br />

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 1950.<br />

WATKINS, G., B.Sc.For.(Wales), Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1946.<br />

WATSON, J. W., M.A., B.Sc.(Lon.), Baunton Corner, Cirencester, Glos. 1959.<br />

WATT, A., C.B.E., B.A.(Oxon), Greenways, 4 Ravelston Dykes Lane, Edinburgh, EH4<br />

3NY. 1947.<br />

WATT, A. W. M., C.B.E., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Forest Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />

Uganda. 1946.<br />

WATT, W. E., A.F.C., B.A., Dip.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, 11 Lawley Street, Waterkloof,<br />

Brooklyn, Pretoria, South Africa. 1922.<br />

WAWIYE, J. J. Y., <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, P.O. Box 30513, Nairobi, Kenya. 1970.<br />

WEBB, A. W., B.Sc.For.(Melb.), 5 Genville Street, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia. 1960.<br />

WEBB, H. R., M.B.E., Budongo, 119 King's Acre Road, Hereford. 1930.<br />

WEBB, W. E., B.S.F.(B.C.), M.S.(N.Y.), R.P.F.(B.C.), Project Manager, Sabah Forest<br />

Inventory, clo Forest Department, P.O. Box 311, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. 1953.<br />

WEBSTER, G., O.B.E., Private <strong>Forestry</strong> Agent, Court House, Beckford, Nr. Tewkesbury,<br />

Glos. 1938.<br />

WEDDERBURN, L. C. M., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), 129 Grieve Street, Dunfermline, Fife.<br />

1960.<br />

WEDDERBURN, R. J., B.A.(Oxon), Chief Conservator of Forests, Ministry of Natural<br />

Resources, North Eastern State, P.M.B. 47 Maiduguri, Nigeria. 1957.<br />

WELLWOOD, Professor R. W., B.Sc., M.F., Ph.D., 4305 West 14th Avenue, Vancouver<br />

8, British Columbia, Canada. 1940.<br />

WELSH, G. H., For.Cer1., Chikangawa, P/Bag, Mzimba, Malawi. 1951.<br />

WESTBROOK, H., 218 Farrand Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. 1971.<br />

WESTERN SAMOA, The <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 206,<br />

Apia, Western Samoa. 1967. .<br />

WESTMACOTf, R. E., 207 Avenue Gardens, The Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, Western<br />

Australia 6009. 1966.<br />

WESTOBY, J. C., Deputy Director Programme Co-ordination and Operations, F.A.O.<br />

Headquarters, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy. 1967.<br />

WESTON, G. C., M.A.(Oxon), B.Sc.(N.Z.), Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New<br />

Zealand. 1949.<br />

WHITAKER, J. D., B.A.For.(Oxon), The Causeway, Beacon Close, Crowborough,<br />

Sussex. 1959.<br />

WHITE, K. J., B.Se.For., Dip.For., Chief Conservator of Forests, Department of<br />

Forests, Konedobu, Papua. 1960.<br />

WHITEHEAD, J. E., Silverdale, New Walk, North Ferriby, Yorks. 1956.<br />

WHITESIDE, H., Mill Manager, Mount Gambier State Mill, Woods and Forests<br />

Department, Mount Gambier, South Australia. 1953.<br />

WHITING, G., Director, Stowmarket Timber Co., All Saints Hall, Creeting S1. Mary.<br />

1951. .<br />

WHOLLEY, J. W., B.Sc.For.(Wales), clo Agriculture and Fishery Department, 393<br />

Canton Road, 12th Floor, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 1953.<br />

WHYTE, I., B.Sc.For.(A.N.U.), clo Department of Forests, Keravat, T.P.N.G. 1969.<br />

WICHT, Dr. C. L., B.Sc.(Stell), B.A.(Oxon), Dr.ln.g.(Dresden), F.R.S.(S.A.), Professor of<br />

Silviculture, <strong>Forestry</strong> Faculty, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.<br />

1932.<br />

WIDDUP, Captain W., M.C., M.M., Company Director, P.O. Box 282, Highlands, Salisbury,<br />

Rhodesia. 1956.<br />

WIGG, L. C. C. T., M.A.(Oxon), B.A.Hons.Bot. Dip.For.(Oxon), 5 Harbord Road,<br />

Oxford. 1925.<br />

WILLAN, R. G. M., C.B.E., B.Sc., Old Hill, Lurgashall, Petworth, Sussex. 1930.<br />

WILLAN, R. L., B.A.(Oxon), Via Del Caucaso 49/7, E.U.R. 00144, Rome, Italy. 1950.<br />

WILLIAMS, G. H. D., B.Se., Forest Department, P.O. Box 228, Ndola, Zambia. 1946.<br />

WILLIAMS, M. R. W., M.A.(Oxon), Calyton Road, Mold, Flintshire. 1948.<br />

WILLIAMSON, J. Q., M.B.E., B.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Victoria House, Victoria<br />

Terrace, Aberystwyth, Cards. 1949.<br />

WIIJLIAMSON, P., I.P., P.O. Box 13, Whanamata, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. 1933.<br />

WILSON, Professor J. 0., Restitutcia Polski, M.A.(Oxon), F.E.Que. L.M., 61 Queen<br />

Mary Road, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 1947.


SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 321<br />

SUPPLEMENTARY LIST OF MEMBERS·<br />

BALL, J. B., B.Sc.(Edin.), Dip.For.(Oxon), "The Sheilings," Haughton Lane, Shifnal,<br />

Shropshire.<br />

BUDONGO SAWMILLS, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda.<br />

lIESMER, Professor H., Dr.For., 53 Bonn 1 (West Germany), Beethovenstr. 30,<br />

F orestinstitute.<br />

HUDSON, J. M., B.Sc.For., 10 Kings\vay, Northwich, Cheshire.<br />

MUTESASIRA, C., clo Forest Department, P.O. Box 31 Entebbe, Uganda.<br />

QUAYNOR, S. O-A., B.Sc., B.S.F., M.Sc., Research Officer, Silviculture, Forest Products<br />

Research Institute, University, P.O. Box 63, Kumasi, Ghana.<br />

ROBBINS, A. M. J., B.Sc.Hons.For.(Aber.), Cert.For.(Oxon), Sandleheath, 44 Langley<br />

Road, Slough, Bucks.<br />

CIIANGES OF ADDRESS·<br />

CHOATE, T. A. R., clo Standard Bank Ltd., 28 Northumberland Avenue, London,<br />

W.C.2.<br />

DANBURY, D. J., B.Sc.For., M.Sc.F., Deputy Head, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, College of<br />

Agriculture and <strong>Forestry</strong>, Newton Rigg, Penrith, Cumberland.<br />

De ROSAYRO, R. A., B.A., B.Sc.(Oxon), B.A.(Lond.), Project Manager, U.N.D.P.I<br />

P.A.O., <strong>Forestry</strong> Development & Watershed Management, 2 South Odeon Avenue,<br />

Kingston 10, Jamaica, West Indies.<br />

DEVITT, J. G., D.S.C., B.Sc.For., Project Manager, F.A.O., P.O. Box 107, Kathmandu,<br />

Nepal.<br />

FEARNSIDE, A., B.Sc.(Wales), R.M.B. 113, Via Woden, A.C.T. 2611, Australia.<br />

HIDE, R., The Cottage, Thurlestobe, Nr. Kingsbridge, South Devon.<br />

JONES, G. A., B.Sc., c/o 2071 Garrick Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.<br />

McKERLIE, J. E., "Windfall," Barncroft, Appleshaw, Andover, Hants.<br />

PEREIRA, J. A., clo Mrs. C. C. Pereira, Office of the President, P.O. Box 30510,<br />

Nairobi, Kenya.<br />

PRIDHAM, F. H., clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Dwellingup, Western Australia.<br />

RICHARDS, Dr. B. N., B.Sc.For., Ph.D., Dip.For., University of New England.<br />

Department of Botany, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.<br />

VYNER, Commander C., 41A Hays Mews, London, W.l.<br />

* Received too late for inclusion in main list.


SECTION 11<br />

COMMONWEALTH FOREST SERVICES AND FOREST<br />

RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

FORESTRY AND TIMBER BUREAU<br />

(Department of National Development)<br />

CANB'ERRA, A.'C.T.<br />

Director-General: D. A. N. Cromer, D.Sc.F,or., M.Se., Dipt.For.<br />

Technical Secretary (and acting Secretary, Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> Council): L. F.<br />

Hammond, B.Sc(For.), Dip.For.<br />

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE:<br />

Director: A. G. M'cArthur, B.Se(For.), Dip.For. (acting).<br />

Officer-In-Charge, Silvicultural Research: A. G. Br,own, B.Sc.(For.), M.Se.,<br />

Dip.For.<br />

Officer-In-Charge, Forest Protectio:n Research: (Vacant).<br />

Officer-in-Charge, Forest Management Research.' M. L. Benson, B.Sc(For.),<br />

Dip.F·or.<br />

Officer-in-Charge, Regional Research Stations.' R. D. Johnston, D.F.C., B.Se.<br />

(Hons.), Ph.D., D.I.C.<br />

TIMBER SUPPLY ECONOMICS BRANCH:<br />

Officer-in-Charge.· C. S. Cree, D.B.E., B.A.(For.).<br />

COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH<br />

ORGANISATION<br />

DIVISION OF FOREST PRODUcrs<br />

P.O. Box 56, Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia<br />

Chief of Division.' R. W. R. Muncy, M.E.E., D.Ap'p.Sc.<br />

Assistant Chief.' F. A. Blakey, B.E., Ph.D.<br />

Assistant Chief.' W. G. Kauman, A.M.T.C., Dr. en Se.<br />

NEW SOUTH WALES<br />

FORESTRY COMMISSION OF N.S.W.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> House, 93·95 Clarence Street, Sydney, 2000<br />

Postal Address: G.P.O. Box 2667, Sydney', 2001<br />

Telephone: 2 0236 Cables: Newforests, Sydney<br />

Commissioner.' F. M. Bailey.<br />

Assistant Commissioners.' H. Porter; A. H. Walker.<br />

Chief, Division of Forest Management: P. T. Cooke.<br />

Chief, Division of Economics and Marketing.' J. L. Henry.<br />

Chief, Division of Forest and Tinlber Resources.' R. B. MeLean.<br />

Chief Division of Wood Technology.' E. B. Huddleston.<br />

Secretary and Chief, Division of Administration: A. R. Cocks.<br />

Chief Inspector.· R. H. Luke.<br />

322


SECTION 11. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 325<br />

Chief of Forest Protection: V. P. Cleary, B.Sc.(For.).<br />

Chief of Education and Research: J. B. Jack, B.Sc.(For.), M.Sc.(For.).<br />

SCHOOL OF FORESTRY<br />

Principal: A. R. Eddy, B.Sc.(For.), M.E.(Calif.).<br />

Senior Lecturer: R. G. Orr, Dip.For.(Oxon), B.Sc.(For.).<br />

WESTERN AUSTRALIA<br />

For.ests Department, Perth, Western Australia<br />

Conservator of Forests: W. R. Wallace.<br />

Deputy Conservator of Forests: D. W. R. Stewart.<br />

Chief of Divisions: B. J. Beggs, W. H. Eastman, J. C. Meachem, P. J. McNamara.<br />

Superintendents: J. B. Camp1bell, D. E. Grace, E. R. Hopkins.<br />

Fire Control Superintendent: F. J. Cam1pbe'll.<br />

Utilisation Officer: H. C. Wickett.<br />

Inspectors: J. J. Have!, P. N. Hewett, A. R. Hill, D. R. Lejeune, S. J. Quain,<br />

J. A. W. Robley, A. D. Van Noort, A. J. Williamson.<br />

Senior Research Officer: A. B. Hatch.<br />

Utilisation Econolnics Officer: P. H. Barrett.<br />

Senior Silviculturist: B. J. White.<br />

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY<br />

Department ·of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.O. Box 4, Canberra A.T.C. 2600<br />

Head of Department: Professor J. D. Ovington, Ph.D., D.Sc.(Sheff.). F.F.S.,<br />

F.I.Biol.<br />

Reader: L. T. Carron, M.Sc.For.(Qld.), Dip.For.(Oxon.), Ph.D. (AND).<br />

Senior Lecturers: E. P. Bachelard, B.Sc.(For.)(Melb.), M.F., Ph.D. (Yale); I. S.<br />

Ferguson, B.Sc.(For.)(Melb.), M.F., D.For.(Yale); R. G. Florence, M.Se.(Qld),<br />

Ph.D.(Syd.); D. M. Griffin, M.A., Se.D., Ph.D.(Cambridge); W. A. Heather,<br />

M.Sc.(Syd.), P'h.D.(ANU); M. T. Tanton, B.Sc., Ph.D., D.I.C. (Lond.),<br />

A.R.C.S.<br />

Post Doctoral Fellow: G. H. Pratt, B.S,c.Agr., Ph.D(AdeI.).<br />

Lecturers: K. W. GToVes., B.Sc.(For.)(Wales); E. D. Parkes, B.Agr.Sc.(New Zeal.),<br />

M.Agr.Sc.(Cant.); K. R. Shepherd, B.Sc.(For.)(Syd.), Ph.D.(Melb.); P. R.<br />

Stevens, B.Agr.Sc.(New Zeal.), M.Agr.Sc.(New Zeal.), Ph.D.(New Zeal.); D.<br />

M. Sto·dart, B.E.(Civil)(Adel.), M.S. in C.E.(Texas); G. B. Wood,<br />

B.Sc.For.(Qld.), Dip'.For.(Oxo'n.), Ph.D.(ANU).<br />

Senior Demonstrators: J. C. G. Banks, B.Sc.(For.)(ANU); M. U. Slee,<br />

M.A.(Oxon.), M.Sc.(AN'U); R. G. Buick, B.Sc.(Cant.), B.Sc.For.(ANU);<br />

T. J. Blake, B.S·c.For.(Syd.), Dip.For.(Canb.), M.F.(Yale).<br />

UNIVERSITY ·OF MELBOURNE<br />

Parkville, N.2 V'ictoria, Australia<br />

SCHOOL OF FORESTRY<br />

Reader-in-Charge<br />

Dip.For.(Vic.).<br />

of <strong>Forestry</strong>: John Harding Chinner, B.Sc(Ox,on.), B.Sc.,<br />

Senior Lecturer in Fo'resf Inventory: John Antony Howard, B.Sc(Wales),<br />

M.F.(Minn.), Ph.D., Dip'.For.(Bangor), F.L.S., A.M.A.I.C.<br />

Senior Lecturer in Forest Economics and Forest Management: (Vacant).<br />

VICTONIAN SCHOOL OF FORESTRY, CRESWICK<br />

Principal: A. R. Eddy, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F., M.F.(California).<br />

Senior Lecturer: R. G. Orr, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F., Dip.For.(Oxon.).<br />

Lecturers: K. J. Wareing, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F.; G. L. Morrison,<br />

Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F.; P. G. Sheehan, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F.; R. R.<br />

Marshall, B.Sc., B.Ed.


326 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

BAHAMAS<br />

Crown Land Department, P.0. Box 592, Nassau<br />

Forest Officer: V. P. Ritchie.<br />

BOTSWANA<br />

No f.orestry staff. Fo·restry is currently the responsibility of the Ministry of<br />

Agriculture.<br />

P.D. 3, Gabarone<br />

BRITISH HONDURAS<br />

Forest Department, P.O. Box 148, Belize City<br />

Chief Forest Officer: L. S. Lindo.<br />

Principal Forest Officer: H. C. Flowers.<br />

Divisio·n Forest Officers: E. I. Bradley, O. Rosado.<br />

BRITISH SOLOMON ISLANDS<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Departm,ent, P.0. Honiara<br />

Conservator of Forests: K. W. Trenaman, O.B.E.<br />

Deputy Conservator of Forests: C. A. M. N.as'h, M.B.E.<br />

Assistant Conservators of Forests: K. D. Marten, E. C. Brandt, N. G. Burn­<br />

Murdoch, M. B. Self.<br />

BRUNEI<br />

FOREST DEPARTMENT, BRUNEI<br />

Conservator of Forests: I. P. Tamworth, M.C., P.J.K., B.A.(Oxon).<br />

CANADA<br />

DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT<br />

Minister: Hon. Jack Davis.<br />

Deputy Minister: Robert F. Shaw.<br />

Senior Assistant Deputy Minister: J. Lupien.<br />

Assistant Deputy Minister (Lands, Forests & Wildlife Service): Dr. M. L. Prebble.<br />

Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service<br />

West Memorial Building, 344 Wellington Stre'et, Ottawa, Ontario·<br />

Director, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service: (Vacant).<br />

Secretary, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Advisory Council: C. C. Thomson.<br />

Director, <strong>Forestry</strong> Relations Directorate: Dr. D. R. Redmond.<br />

Director, Operations Directorate: Dr. R. M. Belyea.<br />

Assistant Director, Operations: C. E. Brown.<br />

Director, Programme Co-ordination Directorate: Dr. H. Schwartz.<br />

Assistant Director, Progra'mme Co-ordination: Dr. R. J. Bourchier.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Economics: H. M. Babcoc·k.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Silviculture: J. H. Cayford.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Forest L,and: Or" P. J. B. Duffy.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Fire: J. C. Macle·od.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Tree Biology: Dr. J. S. Maini.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Pathology: (Vacant).<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Environmental Quality: Dr. I. C. M. Place.<br />

Programme Co·-ordinator, Insect & Disease Survey: R. M. Prentice.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Entomology: W. A. Reeks.<br />

Program'me Co-ordinator, Soils: Dr. P. J. Rennie:.<br />

Programme Co-ordinator, Forest Products: Dr. J. E. Stone.


328 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Head, Timber Management Branch: F. W. McDougall.<br />

Head, Forest Technology School: P. J. Murphy.<br />

BRITISH COLUMBIA<br />

Forest Service, Victoria, B.C.<br />

VICTORIA:<br />

Deputy Minister of Forests: J. S. Stokes.<br />

Chief Forester: L. F. Swannell.<br />

Assistant Chief Forester ilc Operations Branch: I. T. Cameron.<br />

Assistant Chief Forester iI c Services: N. A. McRae.<br />

Forest Counsel: C. Cooper.<br />

Forester i/c Information Division: E. H. Lyons.<br />

Personnel Officer: A. E. McKeever.<br />

Forester i/ c Protection Division: W. C. Phillips.<br />

Forester i/c Management Division: W. G. Hughes.<br />

Engineer llc Engineering Division: P. J. J. Hemphill.<br />

Forester ilc Research Division: W. E. L. Young.<br />

Foreste.r ilc Research Division: R. H. Spilsb·ury.<br />

Forester ile Reforestlation Division: E. W. Robinson.<br />

Forester i/c Training School (Surrey): L. W. Lehrle.<br />

Director, Grazing Division: W. C. Pendray.<br />

VANCOUVER:<br />

District Forester: H. B. Forse.<br />

PRINCE RUPERT:<br />

District Forester: H. M. Pogue.<br />

PRINCE GEORGE:<br />

District Forester: W. Young.<br />

KAMLOOPS:<br />

District Forester: A. H. Dixon.<br />

NELSON:<br />

District Forester: J. R. Johnston.<br />

EASTERN ROCKIES FOREST CONSERVATION BOARD<br />

Calgary, Alberta<br />

Chairman of the Board: J. R. H. Hall.<br />

Federal Member of the Board: M. H. Drinkwater.<br />

Provisional Melnber of the Board: A. T. Baker.<br />

Chief Forester: W. R. Hanson.<br />

Secretary of the Board: J. P. Hourigan.<br />

Research Forester: W. H. Poliquin.<br />

MANITOBA<br />

Department of Mines, Resources and Environment Management, Room 352,<br />

Legislative Building, Winnipeg 1, Manitoba<br />

Deputy Minister: W. Winston Mair.<br />

Assistant Deputy Minister: W. K. Web.ster.<br />

Special Assistant: A. W. Braine.<br />

Director, Resource Management Division: A. O. Jardine.<br />

Chief, <strong>Forestry</strong> Operations: C. D. Rannard.<br />

Forest Protection Officer: R. R. Ross.<br />

Director, Northern Region: W. C.McLean.<br />

Regional Supervisor: S. J. Williamson.<br />

Directo'r, Western Region: D. F. Stewart.<br />

Regional Supervisor: J. D. Robertson.


SECTION 11. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 331<br />

PLANNING BRANCH:<br />

Director: Michel Duchesneau, F.E., M.F.<br />

Regional Planning Service, Chief: Raymond Lord, F.E.<br />

Research Service, Chief: Pierre Dorion, F.E., M.F.<br />

TERRITORIAL DOMAIN BRANCH:<br />

Director: Jeon-Noel Poulin, F.E., Q.L.S.<br />

Lands Service, Chief: Maurice Descoteaux, F.E.<br />

Surveys and Geodesy Service, Chief: Mauriee Duvao, Q.L.S., D.L.S.<br />

Cadastre Service, Chief.' Clovis Labre'cque, Q.L.S.<br />

Photogrammetry and Cartography Service, Chief.' Uon Valois, Eng.<br />

WOODS AND FORESTS BRANCH:<br />

Director.' Yvon Dube, F.E., M.F.<br />

Forest Inventory Service, Chief.' Rene Rinfret, F.E.<br />

Forest Management Service, Chief.' R. G. Langlois, F.E.<br />

Forest Operation Service, Chief: CIaude BIais, F.E.<br />

Restoration Service, Chief.' Herve Lizotte, F.E.<br />

Rural Forest Service, Chief.' Roch Delisle', F.E.<br />

Domanial Forest Service, Chief.' P. M. Archambault, F.E.<br />

CONSERVATION BRANCH:<br />

Director.' Maurice' Vezina, F.E.<br />

Protection Service Chief.' Gerard Paquet, F.E,<br />

TERRITORIAL DIVISIONS BRANCH:<br />

Director.' Oscar Blais, F.E.<br />

SASKATCHEWAN<br />

Department of Natural Resources, <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch, Prince Albert<br />

Minister of Natural Resources.' Hon. Eiling Kramer.<br />

Deputy Minister of Natural Resources.' W. A. Hartwell (Acting).<br />

Assistant Deputy Minister.' M. A. Laird.<br />

Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>.' W. S. Bailey (Acting).<br />

Supervisor, Inventory Section.' A. Kabzem.s.<br />

Supervisor, Management Seciton.' M. C. Millar.<br />

Supervisor, Silviculture Section.' F. W. FlaveIle (Acting).<br />

Regional Superintendent, Prince Albert Region.' A. G. Stark.<br />

Region,al Forester, Prince Albert Region.' F. R. Ford.<br />

Regional Superintendent, Hudson Bay Region.' D. M. Taylor.<br />

Regional Forester, Hudson Bay Regio'n.· M. T. Little.<br />

Regional Superintendent, Meadow Lake Region.' W. A. Klassen.<br />

Regional Forester, Meadow Lake Region.' T. G. Budreo.<br />

Regional Superintendent, Northern Affairs Branch.' J. W. Clouthier.<br />

Regional Superintendent, Southern Region.' D. G. Wyllie.<br />

HIGHER EDUCATION<br />

lTNIVERSITY OF BRmSH COLUMBIA<br />

FACULTY OF FORESTRY<br />

Professor and Dean of Faculty.' Joseph A. F. Gardner, M.A., Ph.D., F.C.I.C.<br />

Associate Professor & Asst Dean.' Donald D. Munro, B.S.F., M.S., Ph.D., R.P.F.<br />

Director of University Research Forest.' Jo·hn WaIters, M.F., R.P.F.<br />

Professors.' N. C. Franz, B.S., M.W.T., Ph.D., B. C. G.oodell, B.Sc., M.Sc., K.<br />

Graham, B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D., P. G. Haddock, B.S., Ph.D., J. H. G. Smith, B.S.F.,<br />

M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., R. W. Wellwoo'd, B.A.Se., M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., J. W. WilSOD,<br />

M.A., Ph.D., R. E. Foster, B.A., B.S.F., Ph.D., R.P.F. (part-time).<br />

4'"


332 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

Associate Professors: L. Ada:movich, Dipl.For.Eng., M.F., R.P.F., P.Eng., D.<br />

Haley, B.Se., "M.F., Ph.D., A. Kozak, B.S.F., M.F., 'Ph.D., D. s. Lacate, B.Sc.F.,<br />

M.Sc., Ph.D., R.P.F., o. Sziklai, DiplFor.Eng., M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., J. V.<br />

Thirgood, B.'Sc, M.F., R.P.F., E. P. Swan, B.A., M.'Sc., Ph.D. (part-time).<br />

HIGHER EDUCATION<br />

LAVAL UNIVERSITY<br />

Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Godesy, Quebec 10<br />

Dean: Andre Lafond.<br />

Associate Dean:<br />

Research: Bernard Bernier.<br />

Administration: Gilbert Sasseville.<br />

Director:<br />

Department of Management & Silviculture: Paul-Emile Vezina.<br />

Department of Ecology aY!d Pedology: Bernard Bernier.<br />

Department of Exploitatio,n and Utilisatio'n: Jean Poliquin.<br />

Department of Geodesy a'nd Cartography: Andre Frechette.<br />

Department of Photogrammet,ry: Alithur J. Branderb'erger.<br />

Directors ,of Studies: Gilbert Sasseville, Rob'ert Bellefe'uille', Marcel Leve;sque'.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK<br />

Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Fredericton, New Bmnswick<br />

PROFESSORS:<br />

Department of Forest Management and Dean of <strong>Forestry</strong>: J. W. Ker, B.Sc., M.F.<br />

Chairman of the Forest Engineering Group: T. C. Bjerkelund, B.Sc.<br />

Forest Entomalogy: N. B,. Brown, B.A., M.A.<br />

Department of Silviculture: H. D. Long, B.Sc., M.Se.<br />

ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS:<br />

William H. Hilborn, B·.Sc.F.(For.).<br />

Norman L. K'issiC'k, B.Sc.F. (Tolr.), M.F. (Yale).<br />

Helmut H. Krause, Diplom-Fo,rstwirt (Freiburg), Ph.D. (Wisconsin).<br />

Wil1iam G. Paterson, 'B.Se., M.Sc. (U.N.B.).<br />

Leslie P. Sebastian, Dip!. For Eng. (Sopron), M.Sc. (State Un'iv. College of<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> at Syracuse Univ).<br />

Arthur L. Van Slyke,B.Sc. (U.N.B.), M.F. (Mich.).<br />

ASSISTANT PROFESSORS:<br />

R,obert B. B. DicIciso'n, B.Se. (Acadia), M.A. (Duke).<br />

Arnold T. Easley, B.Sc.F., M.S,c.F. (U.N.B.).<br />

A. James Kaylll, B.S.F. (U.B.e.), M.F. (D'uke), Ph.D. (Aberdeen).<br />

Ohao-'ho, Meng, B.Se. (Taiwan), M.Se. (U.N.B,.).<br />

F. Stephen Oliver, B.Sc., M.Se.F. (U.N.B.).<br />

Graham R. PowelI, B.Se. (E'din.), M.Sc. (D.N.B.).<br />

Marc H. Schneider, B.Se., M.Se. (State Univ. College of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Syracuse<br />

Univ.).<br />

C. Antony Short, B.Sc., M.Sc. (U.N.B.).<br />

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO<br />

Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />

De'an of <strong>Forestry</strong>: V. J. Nordin, B.A., B.'Se.F., Ph.D., R.P.F.<br />

Professor Emeritus: T. W. Dwight, B.Sc.F., M.F.<br />

Professors: J. W. B. Sisam, B.Sc., M.F., D.Se., R.P.F., K. A. Armson, B.Sc.F.,<br />

Dip.For., !R.P.F., F. M. Bucking'ham, B.Se., M.F., D.F., R.P.F., J. L. Farrar,<br />

B.Sc.F., M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., E. Jorgensen, M.Sc.F., R.P.F., D. V. L,ove,<br />

B.Sc., M.F., R.P.F., A. S. Mic'hell, C.D., B.Sc.F., M.F., R.P.F.


338 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

UNIVERSITY OF WALES<br />

University College of North Wales, Bangor, Caems.<br />

Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> & Wood Science<br />

Telephone: Bangor 2501, Ext. 256<br />

Professor: S. D. Richardson, M.A., B.Se., D.Phil.(Oxon.).<br />

Senior Lecturers: E. R. Huggard, M.A., B.A.I., C.Eng., M.I.C.E., F.S.F.; G. K.<br />

Elliott, B.Sc., M.F., Ph.D., F.I.W.Sc., A.S.F.<br />

SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES<br />

CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND COLLEGE -OF AGRICULTURE<br />

AND FORESTRY, NEWTON RIGG, PENRITH, CUMBERLAND<br />

Telephone: Penrith 3791<br />

Principal: W. Steele, B.Se.<br />

FORESTRY DEPARTMENT STAFF:<br />

Head of Department: A. G. Pyman, N.D.F., A.S. For.<br />

Deputy 'Head: D. J. Danbury, B.Sc. For.. (Hons), M.Sc.F., A.S.Por.<br />

Lect,urers: A. L. Rumbold, B.A. (Hons) (<strong>Forestry</strong>), A.S.For.; J. A. Saunders,<br />

Cert. Ed.; M. G. J. Winn, R.F.S. For. eert. (Dist.), M.S.For.<br />

STAFF OF OTHER DEPARTMENTS ASSISTING IN INSTRUCTION:<br />

H. W. Y. Bowie, S.D.A. (Hons), N.D.D., S.D.D.H., O.N.C. (Forest Machinery).<br />

Miss B. Balmain, B.Sc. Hort. (<strong>Forestry</strong> Scie'nce).<br />

W. J. Craig, F.C.B.I. (Accounting).<br />

A. B. Humphries, N.D.A., M.R.A.C. (Hill Farming).<br />

GRENADA W.I.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Division, Premier's Ministry, Botanic Gardens,<br />

Tanteen, St. George's, Grenada<br />

Supervisor of Forests: J. W. E. Lewls.<br />

GUYANA<br />

Forest Department, Kingston, Georgetown<br />

Conservator of Forests: L. E. Dow.<br />

Deputy Conservator of Forests: C. A. John.<br />

Senior Assistant Conservator of Forests (Silvicultural Division): D. H. Persram.<br />

Assistant Conservator of Forests (Surveys and Inventory): I. A. Welch.<br />

Assistant Conservator of Forests (Administration and Management): V. S. Vieira.<br />

Utilisation Officer: C. F. Collins.<br />

Manager Central Timber Manufacturing Plant (Ag.): B. C. HaIley.<br />

HONG KONG<br />

Agriculture and Fisheries Department<br />

Canton Road Government Office, Kowloon, Hong Kong<br />

Cable Address: Agfish, Hongkong<br />

Director of Agriculture ,and Fisheries: E. H. Nichols.<br />

Deputy Director of Agricult.ure and Fisheries: J. M. Riddell-Swan.<br />

CONSERVATION & FORESTS DIVISION:<br />

Senior <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer: P. A. Daley.<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Officer: J. W. Whole·y.


SECTION 11. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 339<br />

INDIA<br />

Minhtry of Food, and Agriculture, Rajendra Prasad Road,<br />

New Delhi, India<br />

Inspector-General of Forests: R. C. SonL<br />

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND COLLEGES<br />

P.O. New Forest, Dehra Dun<br />

President: S. K. Seth, I.F.S.<br />

Director of Forest Education: H. C. Day.<br />

Director of Forest Products Research: N. J. Masani.<br />

Director of Biological Research: (Vacant).<br />

Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research: I. M. Qureshi.<br />

Registrar: V. S. Bendre.<br />

PubLicity and Liaison Officer: Girish Chandra.<br />

Head of Utilisation Research, Forest Research Laboratory, Bangalo're-3.· Dr.<br />

P. S. Rao.<br />

COLLEGES<br />

Dean, Indian Forest ColLege: K. P. Karamchandani.<br />

Principal, Northern Forest Rangers College, Dehra Dun.· K. V. Kakkar.<br />

Princip.al, Southern Forest Rangers ColLege and' Head of Biological Research,<br />

Coimbatore: A. M. Mohmood Hussain.<br />

BRANCtI OFFICERS<br />

Officers-in-Charge.· N. C. lain (Conl.posite Wood Branch), A. C. Sekhar (Timber<br />

Me'chanics Branch), S. R. D. Guha (Cellulose and Paper Branch), M. G.<br />

Karnik (C


SECTION II. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 343<br />

LESOTHO<br />

(Formerly Basutoland)<br />

Conservation Division, Ministry of Agriculture, P.O. Box 24, Masem<br />

Foreste.r in Charge: O. K. Thabane.<br />

MALAWI<br />

Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game, Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources,<br />

P.0. Box 182, Zomba, Malawi<br />

Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game: J. L. Coldwells.<br />

Conservator (Reserves and Plantations): P. J. Sheldrake.<br />

Manager, Forest Industries: C. T. Bundy.<br />

Game W.arden: B. G. Kinloch.<br />

Project Manager, Vipya Pulpwood Pr,oject: J. E. Acheson, M.B.E.<br />

Head, Forest Research Institute: Dr. N. Paterson.<br />

Principal, Forest School: M. J. Burke.<br />

MALAYSIA<br />

WEST MALAYSIA<br />

Forest Department Headquarters, JalaD SwetteDham, Kuala Lumpur<br />

Telegrams: "UTAN"<br />

Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>: Haji Abdul Majid bin Haji Mohd. Shahid.<br />

Deputy Director Of <strong>Forestry</strong>: Ismail bin Haji Ali.<br />

Assistant Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>: Mohd. Darus bin Haji Mahmud.<br />

Conservator of Foresls (Utilisation): Le·o·ng Hin Nin.<br />

Chief Assistant Conservaf/or of Forests: Mohd. Yakin bin Long.<br />

State Forest Officer, Johore: Dato· Haji Wan Hassan b·.Abd. Halim.<br />

State Forest Offier, Kedah/P. Pinang: S. S. Sing-ham.<br />

State Forest Officer, Kelantan: Othman. bin Manan.<br />

State Forest Officer, N. Sembilan/Melaka: Muhamm:e'd bin Jabil.<br />

State Forest Officer, Perak: Che' Din bin. Emby.<br />

State Forest Officer, Pahang: Mo'hd. Nor bin Yaacob.<br />

State Fo,rest Officer, Selango'r: Chong Pe,ng Wah.<br />

State Forest Officer. Trengganu: Ismail bin Johari.<br />

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, KEPONG·<br />

Chief Research Officer: K. D. Me'non.<br />

Deputy Chief Research Officer (Forest Products): Lee Yew Hon.<br />

Deputy Chief Research Officer (Forest): Fre'ezaillah 'b.Che Yeom.<br />

Senior Chemist: Pe'h Teik Bin.<br />

SABAH, MALAYSIA<br />

Forest Department, P.O. Box 311, SaDdakan, Sabah<br />

Telegrams: "Forests, Sandakan"<br />

Conservator of Forests: H. S·. Martyn.<br />

Deputy Conservator of Forests: M. P. Fabia.<br />

Senior Assistant Conservators of Forests: A. J. Hepburn, V. M. Corpuz, M. A.<br />

Munoz.<br />

Assistant Conservators of Forests: M. P. Udarbe, D. V. Jenkins, I. H. Sari0 ,<br />

Richard Tay Yea Chee', Liew That Chim.<br />

Administrative Officer (Administration): Kong Kwok Wah.<br />

Administrative Officer (Forest Inspection): D. Williamson.<br />

Cartographer: Chin He'ng Yin.<br />

Ganle Warden.' G. S. de' Silva.


348 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

SINGAPORE<br />

Timber Office, Trade Division, Ministry of Finance, 2nd Floor,<br />

Fullerton Bu,ilding, Singapore 1<br />

Timber Officer: Ku Pak Ming.<br />

Senior Timber Inspector: Chan Ka'i Hua (acting).<br />

SWAZILAND<br />

Director of Agriculture, M'inistry of Agriculture,<br />

P.0. Box 182, Mbabane, Swaziland<br />

Appointment of a forest officer is pending.<br />

TANZANIA<br />

Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, Forest Division,<br />

National Bank of Commerce, Oock T,ower Build,ing,<br />

P.0. Box 426, Dar es Salaam<br />

Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>: D. R. Lyamuya.<br />

Chief Research Officer: (Vac.ant).<br />

Utilisation Officer: K. S. Chunsi (acting).<br />

Silviculturist: P. E. Kimariyo (acting).<br />

Forest Officer (Planning): R. M. S. Kyando,.<br />

Forest Officer (Research): P. V. Tesha.<br />

Forest Officer (Survey): F. R. Sakaya.<br />

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO<br />

The Forest Division, Port of Spain<br />

Conservator of Forests: Bal Siew Ramdial, B.Sc.<br />

Deputy Conservator of Forests: Selwyn Dard:aine', B.Sc.<br />

Assistant Directo·r (<strong>Forestry</strong>) Eastern C,aribbean Institute of Agriculture and<br />

Fo'restry:: Na'rine P. Lackhan, B.Sc.<br />

Assistant Conservators of Forests: Lennox P. Mann, B.Sc.; Dave M. Elliott,<br />

B.Sc. ; Peter A. Durgnat.<br />

Management and Planning Officer: Thom:as I. W. Bell, B.A., M.Sc., M.A., Ph.D.<br />

UGANDA<br />

Ministry of Agriculture, <strong>Forestry</strong> & Co-operative, Forest Department,<br />

P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda<br />

Chief Conservator of Forests:: M. L. S. B. Rukuba.<br />

Deputy Chief Conservator of Forests: A. W. M. Watt.<br />

Conservator of Forests (Administration): E. K. B. Mwanga.<br />

Senior Working Plans Officer: B. Kingston.<br />

MANAGEMENT DIVISION:<br />

Regional Forest Officer, Western Region: D. Midholi.<br />

Regional Forest Officer, Buganda Region: E. K. Serwanga.<br />

Regional Forest Officer, Northern Region: J. Murekezi.<br />

Regional Forest Officer, Eastern Region: C. L. Mutesasira.<br />

RESEARCH DIVISION:<br />

Senior Conservator of Forests (Research): A. M. Stuart-Smith.<br />

Senior Silviculturist: P. K. Karani.<br />

Senior Utilisation Officer: A. L. M. B·itarakwate.<br />

Forest Entomologist: M. Oloya.<br />

Charcoal Development Officer: J. Ma·bonga-Mwisak.a.<br />

TRAININO-NYABYEYA FOREST COLLEGE:<br />

Principal: L. S. Kiwanuka.<br />

Assistant Principal: C. H. Lyadda.


SECTION II. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 349<br />

HIGHER EDUCATION<br />

Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Makerere University, Kampala<br />

Professor:: N. K. Herm'ensen, 'Head of Departm'ent, Lecture'r in Forest<br />

Economics.<br />

Senior Lecturers: (a) Dr. '0. Haveraeen, Lecturer in Forest Biology; (b) Dr. L.<br />

Nagoda, Lecture'r in Wood Utilisation.<br />

ZAMBIA<br />

Zambia Forest Department, P.O. Box 288, Ndola, Zambia<br />

Chief Conservator of Forests: A. P. B. Hamilton, M.A., B.Sc.<br />

Deputy Chief COlnservato'r of Forests: B. O. M. Chiyabwe, B.Sc.<br />

Director Industrial Plantations: J. Logie, B.A.<br />

Chief Working Plans and Surveys Officer: D. E. Greenwo,od, M.A., B.A.<br />

Chief Forest Products Officer: A. A. WO'o'd, B.Sc.<br />

Chief Extension and Training Officer: R. H. Graham, B.Sc., Dip.Bd.


356 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

pathology; mycorrhiza; forest economics; and the elements of work study.<br />

Research is financed by grant giving 'bodies such as NERC, ARC, NRDC, the<br />

United Kingdom <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, and especially by contributions from<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Governments. The latter contributJions also enable the Department<br />

to carry out advisory work for research authorities throughout the' <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

o'n experimental design, inventories, sampling, and plant taxonomy and identification<br />

including that of wo,od specimens.<br />

The Forest Herbarium whlich is administered jointly with the herbaria of the<br />

Department of Botany may be consulted by arrang'ement. All important 'woody<br />

families are represented by specimens of most of the world's timber trees. Most<br />

of them are' correlated with bark and wood specimens, material preserved in<br />

spirit and information on field characters, ecology and economic uses.<br />

The wood collection conta!ins over 20,000 specimens from over 8,000 species,<br />

including many topical woods. It is available for use by visiting scientists, and<br />

slides and some spe,cimens can be provided on loan.<br />

The library facil/ities of which are available to visitors by arrangement, has a<br />

world-wide coverage. Its close association with the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau<br />

enables it to be one of the most comprehensive specialist <strong>Forestry</strong> libraries in the<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong>.<br />

10.-COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE, LONDON<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Institute, Kensington High Street, London, W.8<br />

Telephone: 01-937 8252<br />

Director: J. K. Thompson, C.M.G.<br />

Deputy Director: (V,acant).<br />

Curator, Exhibition Galleries: J. H. Swain.<br />

The Co'mm,onwealth Institute is a grant-aided body under the aegis of the<br />

<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Office and controlled by an independent Board of Governors ot<br />

which the Rt. Hon. the Lord Garner, G.C.M.G., is c'hairman. It -includes all the<br />

High Commissione'rs of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries. The Institute maintains<br />

public galleries with permanent exhibitions illustrating the life, scenery, resources<br />

and development of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries and their 'dependencies. Exhibits<br />

include examples of the more 'important timbe'rs produced in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />

and these timber ex1hibits are supported by photographs and, in some cases, by<br />

dioramas (illuminated three'-d'imensional picture models) depicting timber extraction.<br />

Minor forest products are also illustrated and described.<br />

The Exhibition Galleries are ,open free to fhe public on -every day throughout<br />

the year except on Good Friday, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and B,oxing Day.<br />

Weekdays 10-5.30; Saturdays 10-5.30; Sundays 2.30-6. There is a cinema, an art<br />

gallery and\ a licensed buffet restaurant.<br />

It.-EAST AFRICAN AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESEARCH<br />

ORGANISATION<br />

P.O. Box 30148, Nairobi, Kenya<br />

E.A.A.F.R.O. is responsible for undertaking research in the fields of agriculture<br />

and forestry on problems that:<br />

1) are common to at least two of the East African countries and can be investigated<br />

most efficiently and economically 'by a central research ,organisation;<br />

2) require ionger-term investigation o'r more intensive study than can be undertaken<br />

by National Departments;<br />

3) require highly specialised and expensive equipment or the service of such<br />

specialists as can only be justified on an East African basis.<br />

Director: Dr. B. N. Majisu, B.Sc., Ph.D.<br />

Deputy Director: Dr. F. J. Wangati.


SECTION Ill. DEPARTMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS 361<br />

20.-PULP AND PAPER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CANADA<br />

570 St. John's Blvd., Pointe Claire, P.Q., Canada<br />

T'he Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada (President: Dr. Pierre R.<br />

Gendron) is a non-profit organisation carrying on fundamental and applied laboratory<br />

and 'field research, and providing post-graduate training and bibliographic<br />

and tec'hnical services in the pulp and paper field from logging to final products.<br />

It lis l,ocated at Pointe Cla'ire, a suburb about 15 miles from the centre of Montreal.<br />

Its staff numbers about 200. It iis affiliated with M-cGill University and has about<br />

45 post-graduate students who do th'esis studies under Institute staff members<br />

identified with the McGrill Faculty. The Institute is supported jointly by the<br />

Canadian pulp and paper 'industry, the Canadian Government, and the University_<br />

Some technical services and applied research are undertaken through contracts<br />

with individua'l companies or gro,ups thereof, not only in the pulp and paper<br />

industry but also in allied industry. The main Divisions of the Institute are as<br />

follo-ws: Logging Researc1h; Applied Chemistry; Applied Physics; Process Research;<br />

Information Services; Te-chnical Services; Business Services.<br />

2t.-THE ASSOCIATION OF U.K. WOOD PULP PRODUCERS<br />

Chairman: J. A. Colvin (this js subject to change at the Annual General Meeting<br />

to be held in November).<br />

OBJECTS<br />

The objects of the Association are:<br />

(a) To promote the consideration and discussi.on of all questions affecting the<br />

manufacture of wood pulp in the U.K. and generally to watch over and<br />

protect the interests of persons engage-d in that trade.<br />

(b) To represent the 'interests of pulp mills using home grown woo-d in relation<br />

to the Board of Trade and other Government Departments, and nationalised<br />

industries, the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission and organisations of private forestry,<br />

timber merchants, etc.<br />

(c) To encourage an increased planting programme.<br />

(d) To encourage economical growing of pulpwood.<br />

(e) To encourage the economical operation of saw mills and other wood using<br />

industries so that their by-products are a supplementary raw material for<br />

pulp mills.<br />

(f) To encourage the most econonlicaI harvesting and ttansportation of pulpwoo,d.<br />

(g) To inform the public on matters affecting the trade.<br />

(h) To establish, if and when -desirable, contact with the Associations of other<br />

industries using home grown woo-d, e.g. the manufacturers of particle board.<br />

(i) To collect and circulate statistics and other inform,ation on all matters<br />

affecting the- trade and manufacture of home grown wo-od pulp.<br />

(j) To co-operate with The British Paper and Board Makers' Association<br />

(Incorporated) in any matters affecting the interests of paper and board<br />

makers as a w'h-ole.<br />

(k) To raise suc'h funds as may be required for the furtherance of any of the<br />

objects of the Association either by subscriptions from the Members or in<br />

any other suitable manner.<br />

(1) To do all such -other lawful things as may be incidental to or conducive to<br />

the attainment ,of the above ,objects.<br />

22.-ROTHAMSTED EXPERIMENTAL STATION<br />

Harpenden, England<br />

Director: Sir Frederick Bawden, M.A., F.R.S.<br />

FOlunded in 1843, Rothamsted is the oldest agricultural research station in the<br />

world. The range of its wo,rk is indicated by the names of its twelve departments:<br />

6


SECTION Ill. DEPARTMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS 363<br />

15.-SCOTTISH WOODLAND OWNERS ASSOCIATION<br />

OFFICERS:<br />

Hon. President: The· Duke of Buccleuch and Queensbury, K.T., G.e.v.o.<br />

Chairman: Sir William Gordon Cummtng, Bt.<br />

Deputy Chairman: Major R. N. Jardine Paterson, Captain D. S. Bowser.<br />

Secretary: R. G. Sangster, C.B.E., B.Sc., 6 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RD.<br />

Telep,hone: 031-226 3475.<br />

MEMBERSHIP:<br />

Woodland owners in Scotland ma,y become' Ordinary M"embers and others concerned<br />

with forestry and timber production may become Associates.<br />

OBJECTS:<br />

To represent private woodland owners to Government and other bodies and<br />

ensure availability of assistance' for managing woodlands and producing and<br />

marketing timbe,r.<br />

MEETINGS:<br />

Annual General Meeting, Regional Meetings. The National Board meets<br />

quarterly.<br />

PUBLICATIONS:<br />

Annual Report and periodic Newsletters.<br />

16.-TIMBER GROWERS' ORGANISATION LIMITED<br />

National Agricultural Centre, Kenilworth, Warwickshire CV8 2LG<br />

OFFICERS:<br />

Chairman: The Rt. Hon. The Earl of L,onsdale.<br />

Vice-Chairman: Colonel J. F. Williams-Wynne, D'4.S.0 ., J.P.<br />

Secretary: The Rt. Hon. The Lord Norto'n, O.B.E.<br />

MEMBERSHIP:<br />

Annual Subscriptio'n-<br />

Wood/and owners: £2.50 to £250.00 according to acreage.<br />

Associates: £2.50.<br />

MEETINGS:<br />

Annual General Meeting, Quarterly Council Me'etings.<br />

Regional Me'etings and Excursions throughout the year.<br />

PUBLICATIONS:<br />

The Timber Grower-quarterly.<br />

17.-TIMBER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION<br />

Telephone: Nap'hill 3091/STD 0240-24 3091<br />

Chairman: Fel'ix PaImer.<br />

Director J. Scott McBride, B.A.Sc.(Hons), B.Sc.F., P.Eng., A.M.A.S.M.E.,<br />

M.I.Ex., F.I.W.S.C.<br />

TRADA is a research association jointly fin,anced by industry and the Department<br />

of the Enviro,nment. Its research and development work c,overs architectural<br />

design, building constructio,n, materia;ls handling, woodwork'ing, timber engineering,<br />

mining, fire testing, service triails on glues an'd finis'hes, boat building, packaging,<br />

joinery and other :industrial applicatio·ns of timber and timber-based panel products.<br />

Results of tits work are dlisseminate'd through its educational, promotional and<br />

advisory activities and its pu'blications.<br />

18.-TROPICAL PRODUcrs INSTITUTE<br />

56/62 Gray's Inn Road" London, WCIX 8LU<br />

Telephone: 01·141 5411<br />

Director: P. C. Spensley, M.A., D.Phil., F.R.I.C.<br />

Deputy Director: E. M. Thain, B.Sc., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.<br />

The Tropical Products Institute (TPI) c'arries out research and gives advice on the<br />

processing,. control .of quality, storage and marketing of the plant and animal


SECTION IV. FORESTRY AND ALLIED SOCIETIES 371<br />

NEW ZEALAND<br />

NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF FORESTERS (Inc.)<br />

P.O. Box 15096, Mira1mar, Wellington 3, New Zealand<br />

Officers tor 1971-72-President: J. G. Groome, Taupo; Vice-President: J. J. K.<br />

Spiers, Kaingaroa Forest; Treasurer: C. H. Brown,Palmerston North; Secretary:<br />

J. P. Lysaght, Wellington; I.P. President: M. J. Conway, Wellington; Council:<br />

D. A. Franklin, Rangiora; J. W. Levy, Christchurc'h; J. M. Mitc'hell, Kawerau;<br />

J. D. Rockell, Palmerston North; A. G. D. W'hyte, Christchurch.<br />

Membership: 576 in honorary mem'bers, me'mbers, associate members, affiliate<br />

members and student members.<br />

Meetings: Annual general in May each year.<br />

Sections: Auckland, Rotorua, Hawkes Bay, Wellington, Nelson, Westland,<br />

Canterbury and! S,outhland.<br />

Publication: New Zealand Journal of <strong>Forestry</strong>, twice a year, $NZ3.50.<br />

Editor: C. G. R. Chavasse, Forest Research Institute', Private Bag, Rotorua,<br />

New Zealand.<br />

NIGERIA<br />

FORESTRY ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> Department, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.<br />

Officers-President: J. L. Ladip'o ; Secretary: J. F. Redhead.<br />

Objective: To pro'mote the interest ,of the State Forest Services and the Timber<br />

Trade.<br />

THE TREE CLUB<br />

(The Ibadan University <strong>Forestry</strong> S·ociety)<br />

Founded 1964<br />

Officers: President, Vice-President, Secre1tary, Treasurer and Editor are elected<br />

annually fro,m the undergraduate members of the University.<br />

Metnbership: Registration fe'e lOp. Annual subscription for students SOp. Annual<br />

subscription for other members one guinea. Membership ope'n to students and exstudents<br />

of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Agriculture or Botany in the University ,of lba'dan, and the<br />

staff of the University of Ibadan.<br />

Publication: Obeche, publis'hed annually.


374 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />

(ii) To promote and encourage the practice of forestry and allied subjects.<br />

(Hi) To collect and disseminate information and statistics regarding silviculture,<br />

forest management, forest products, wood utilisation and marketing, tree planting,<br />

forest conservation (including flora, fauna, land and water) and the recreational<br />

use of forest resources in South Africa.<br />

(iv) To have the Association represented at conferences or meetings in any country<br />

of societies or organisations for promoting the interests of forestry or allied<br />

subjects, to collaborate in their work and to exchange pu·blications with them.<br />

(v) To publish quarterly a journal of the South African <strong>Forestry</strong> Association to<br />

promote the foregoing objects and to pUblish the proceedings of the Association.<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS<br />

tOtO-t6th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, U.S.A.<br />

Officers-President: R. P. Davis<br />

Vice-President and Editor-in-Chief: H. R. Glascock Jr.<br />

Membership.' 17,500 Student members $5 per annum; affiliate members $16 and $20<br />

per annum; associate members $16 and $20 per annum; members $16, $22 and $30 per<br />

annum; fellows $30; corresponding members $10 per annum.<br />

Meetings.' Annual national meeting, four days, October. Additional meetings. throughout<br />

the year are held by 24 regional sections and 140 local Chapters.<br />

Publications: Journal of <strong>Forestry</strong>, monthly, free to members; V.S. or Canada subscriptions<br />

$18 per annum, other foreign subscriptions $19 per annum.<br />

Forest Science, quarterly; U.S. or Canada subscription ,$10 per annum, other foreign<br />

subscriptions $11 per annum.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!