Commonwealth Forestry Review
Commonwealth Forestry Review
Commonwealth Forestry Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><strong>Review</strong><br />
Vol. 50 (1), No. 143, March 1971<br />
PUBLISHED BY<br />
THE COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY AssoCIATION<br />
AT/THE ROYAL COMMONWEALTH SOCIETY, 18 NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE.<br />
LONDON, W.C.2.<br />
Price to Non-Menlbers £1.25 Net
THE COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION<br />
Incorporated by Royal Charter, November 1921, and by Supplemental Royal Charter, 1962<br />
At THE ROYAL COMMONWEALTH SOCIETY<br />
18 NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE, LONDON, W.C.2<br />
TELEPHONE: 01-930 7209<br />
Patron:<br />
tIER MAJESTY THE QUEEN<br />
President:<br />
HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH AND QUEENSBERRY, P.C., K.T., G.C.V.D.<br />
Vice-Presidents:<br />
SIR HARRY CHAMPION, C.I.E.<br />
E. BRYAN LATHAM, C.B.E., M.M.<br />
COLONEL SIR STUART MALLINSON, C.B.E., D.S.D., M.C., J.P.<br />
Past Chairmen:<br />
1921-22. THE RT. HON. VISCOUNT NOVAR, K.T., G.C.M.G., P.C.<br />
1923-24. COLONEL THE RT. HON. LORD COURTHOPE, M.C., P.C.<br />
1924-27. SIR JOHN STIRLING MAXWELL, Bt., K.T.<br />
.1927-32. SIR P. H. CLUTTERBUCK, C.I.E., C.B.E., V.D.<br />
1933-34. SIR JOHN STIRLING MAXWELL, Bt., K.T.<br />
1934-37. THE RT. HON. VISCOUNT STONEHAVEN, G.C.M.G., D.S.O., P.C.<br />
1938-54. THE RT. l-IoN. THE EARL OF CLARENDON, K.G., G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O., P.C.<br />
1954-59. THE RT. HON. LORD MILVERTON, G.C.M.G.<br />
1959-61. SIR HARRY CHAMPION, C.I.E.<br />
1961-64. E. BRYAN LATHAM, C.B.E., M.M.<br />
Chairman:<br />
SIR ARTHUR GOSLING, K.B.E., C.B.<br />
Vice-Chair/nan:<br />
PROFESSOR M. V. LAURIE, C.B.E.<br />
Hon. Treasurer:<br />
C. G. A. LATHAM<br />
Governing Council:<br />
ABOUL MAJID BIN HAJI MOHAMED SHAHID, PROFESSOR J. D. MATTHEWS (Britain)<br />
M.B.E. (Malaya) D. M. MBuRu (Kenya)<br />
S. A. ALEEM (Pakistan) A. M. OSENI (Nigeria)<br />
B. H. BEDNALL, C.B.E. (Australia) A. K. K. OWUSU-AFRIYIE (Ghana)<br />
F. G. BROWNE (Britain) T. A. OXLEY (Britain)<br />
SIR HARRY CHAMPION, C.I.E. (Britain) R. W. V. PALMER, D.B.E. (Britain)<br />
DR. D. A. N. CROMER A. L. POOLE (New Zealand)<br />
DR. H. C. DAWKINS, M.B.E. (Britain) S. D. RICHARDSON (Britain)<br />
J. A. DICKSON, C.B. (Britain) G. J. RODGER (Australia)<br />
L. E. Dow (Guyana) M. L. S. B. RUKUBA (Uganda)<br />
F. C. FORD ROBERTSON, O.B.E. (Britain) R. G. SANGSTER, C.B.E. (Britain)<br />
R. E. GROVES (Britain) E. J. SHRUBSHALL (Britain)<br />
J. D. B. HARRISON, D.C.M. (Canada) DEAN J. W. B. SISAM (Canada)<br />
S. L. KESSEL, M.B.E. (Australia) R. C. SONI (India)<br />
G. J. KILEO (Tanzania) DUNCAN STEVENSON, D.B.E. (Britain)<br />
A. F. A. LAMB, D.B.E. (Britain) C. SWABEY, C.M.G. (Britain)<br />
E. BRYAN LATHAM, C.B.E., M.M. (Britain) E. THORPE, O.B.E. (Britain)<br />
C. G. A. LATHAM (Britain) K. W. TRENAMAN (Br. Solomon Islands)<br />
L. S. LINDO (British Honduras) A. R. TRIST (Australia)<br />
W. E. M. LOGAN, D.B.E. (Britain) E. J. WARD (Canada)<br />
R. G. McKEE (Canada) G. WATKINS (Fiji)<br />
COLONEL SIR S. S. MALLINSON, C.B.E., G. WEBSTER, O.B.E. (Britain)<br />
D.S.O., M.C., J.P. (Britain) J. WYATT-SMITH (Nigeria)<br />
Editor and Secretary:<br />
E. W. MARCH, M.A.<br />
Auditors:<br />
W. M. CORMACK, e.A.• P. F. HERMON.
Rail, R.<br />
Waterer, R.R.<br />
Webster, F. V.<br />
Wilson, J. A.<br />
RESEARCH NOTES<br />
Australia<br />
Canada<br />
E.A.A.F.R.O.<br />
Nigeria<br />
United Kingdom<br />
REVIEWS-Books and Publications<br />
Aerial Photo-Ecology<br />
Afforestation in Arid Zones<br />
Australian Timber Handbook<br />
Bats of West Africa<br />
Bulletin of the Nigerian Forest Department 1969<br />
Developing a Better Environlnent...<br />
Evergreen Forests of Malawi<br />
Fast-growing Trees of the Lowland Tropics<br />
Fertiliser Treatment of Forest Trees<br />
Flora of Tropical East Africa<br />
Flora Zatnbesiaca ...<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> in Northern Ireland<br />
Industrial I-listory of Dean...<br />
Joinery<br />
La Foret<br />
Manual of the Forest Trees of Papua and New Guinea<br />
My Life My Trees ...<br />
Native Trees of Canada<br />
Planning Research for Resource Decisions<br />
Rodents of West Africa<br />
Standard Volume Tables for Coniferous Species of North West Pakistan<br />
Text Book of Soil Chemical Analysis<br />
Timber Frame House of England<br />
Trials of Exotic Tree Species in the Savanna Region of Nigeria<br />
Untersuching uber forstliche Konzessionen, Ein Beitrag Zur Forderung der Forstwirtschaft<br />
in den Entwicklungslandem<br />
World Timbers No. 3<br />
PAGE<br />
219<br />
216<br />
17<br />
218<br />
228<br />
28,230<br />
233<br />
31<br />
234<br />
REVmWS-Annual Reports<br />
British Columbia 1969 82<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Development Corporation-Report and Accounts 1970 287<br />
Division of Forest Products C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne 1968-69 284<br />
Division of Forest Products C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne 1969-70 83<br />
Eastern Rockies Forest Conservation Board 1968-69 and 1969-70 83<br />
Fiftieth Annual Report of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain 1969-70 78<br />
Forest Insect and Disease Survey, Canadian Forest Service 1969 285<br />
Forest Research Institute, New Zealand 1969 ... 80<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Victoria, Australia 1969-70 287<br />
Ghana Forest Products Research Institute, 1968 84<br />
Hong Kong 1969-70 286<br />
Kerala 1967-68 82<br />
Mauritius 1968 281<br />
Republic of Ireland 1967-68 85<br />
Republic of Zambia 1969 ... 280<br />
Rhodesia <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission 1968-69 ... 79<br />
South Africa 1969 ... 81<br />
South Australia 1968-69 286<br />
United Kingdom <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission Report on Research 1970 282<br />
United Republic of Tanzania 1968 283<br />
Wattle Research Institute, University of Natal, South Africa... 282<br />
West Malaysia 1967 86<br />
GOLDEN JUBILEE NUMBER<br />
Loyal Message and Reply<br />
His Grace The Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry<br />
Chairman's Foreword ...<br />
6<br />
279<br />
71<br />
274<br />
275<br />
78<br />
274<br />
276<br />
280<br />
271<br />
273<br />
76<br />
277<br />
270<br />
277<br />
74<br />
275<br />
77<br />
74<br />
273<br />
275<br />
76<br />
270<br />
277<br />
73<br />
76<br />
74<br />
89<br />
91<br />
92
Editorial<br />
Commonlvealth <strong>Forestry</strong> Association-A SO-year Retrospect<br />
Officers of the Association<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest Authorities and Institutions ...<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain<br />
India<br />
Pakistan<br />
Australia<br />
Canada ...<br />
New Zealand<br />
Northern Ireland<br />
Mrica<br />
Botswana<br />
Gambia<br />
Ghana<br />
Kenya<br />
Lesotho<br />
Malawi<br />
Nigeria<br />
Rhodesia<br />
Sierra Leone<br />
Tanzania<br />
Uganda<br />
Zambia<br />
Asia<br />
Ceylon<br />
Hong Kong ...<br />
West Malaysia<br />
Sabah...<br />
Sarawak<br />
Island Territories<br />
The Bahamas<br />
British Solomon Islands Protectorate<br />
Cyprus<br />
Fiji<br />
Mauritius<br />
Seychelles<br />
West Indies<br />
British Honduras<br />
Dominica<br />
Grenada<br />
Guyana<br />
Jamaica<br />
St. Lucia<br />
Trinidad and Tobago<br />
Former <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Territories<br />
Palestine<br />
South Africa<br />
Sudan<br />
British Universities-Department of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Oxford<br />
Aberdeen<br />
Bangor<br />
.Edinburgh<br />
Calnbridge<br />
Forest Products Research Laboratory, Princes Risborough<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Advisers<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences<br />
Forty-Ninth Annual General Meeting<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
7<br />
PAGE<br />
93<br />
94<br />
101<br />
104<br />
105<br />
108<br />
113<br />
115<br />
123<br />
130<br />
134<br />
136<br />
136<br />
136<br />
138<br />
139<br />
139<br />
141<br />
143<br />
144<br />
145<br />
147<br />
148<br />
150<br />
151<br />
151<br />
153<br />
155<br />
156<br />
156<br />
156<br />
157<br />
159<br />
159<br />
160<br />
161<br />
161<br />
162<br />
163<br />
164<br />
164<br />
166<br />
167<br />
168<br />
170<br />
172<br />
173<br />
175<br />
176<br />
178<br />
181<br />
183<br />
184<br />
188
Editorial<br />
Section I<br />
List of Members<br />
Section 11<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest Departments<br />
Australia<br />
Bahamas<br />
Botswana<br />
British Honduras<br />
British Sololnon Islands<br />
Brunei<br />
Canada<br />
Ceylon<br />
Cyprus<br />
Dominica<br />
Fiji<br />
Gambia<br />
Ghana<br />
Great Britain<br />
Grenada<br />
Guyana<br />
Hong Kong ...<br />
India<br />
Jamaica<br />
Kenya<br />
Lesotho<br />
Malawi<br />
Malaysia<br />
Mauritius<br />
New Hebrides<br />
New Zealand<br />
Nigeria<br />
Northern Ireland<br />
Pakistan<br />
Rhodesia<br />
St. Helena<br />
St. Lucia<br />
Seychelles<br />
Sierra Leone<br />
Singapore<br />
Swaziland<br />
Tanzania<br />
Trinidad and Tobago<br />
Uganda<br />
Zambia<br />
HANDBOOK NUMBER<br />
Section III<br />
Departments and Institutions Concerned with <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Section IV<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> and Allied Societies of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
Section V<br />
Foreign and International <strong>Forestry</strong> Organisations<br />
Printed by Oxley & Son (Windsor) Ltd., 2-4 Victoria Street, Windsor, Berks.<br />
PAGE<br />
289<br />
290<br />
322<br />
326<br />
326<br />
326<br />
326<br />
326<br />
326<br />
333<br />
333<br />
333<br />
334<br />
334<br />
334<br />
334<br />
338<br />
338<br />
338<br />
339<br />
342<br />
342<br />
343<br />
343<br />
343<br />
344<br />
344<br />
344<br />
345<br />
346<br />
347<br />
347<br />
347<br />
347<br />
347<br />
347<br />
348<br />
348<br />
348<br />
348<br />
348<br />
349<br />
350<br />
365<br />
372
c. E. LANE-POOLE<br />
CHARLES EDWARD LANE-POOLE first came to Australia in 1916 and for the next thirty<br />
years zealously applied his great talents to the advancement offorestry in that country,<br />
first on a State, and later on a Federal level.<br />
Arriving at a time when Australian forestry was still regarded in many quarters as<br />
little more than a mining operation, Lane-Poole played a prominent role in the fornlulation<br />
and acceptance of sound forest policies on which are based many of the<br />
great developments that have taken place since his retirement from official forestry<br />
in 1945.<br />
Although his n10st enduring contributions probably lie in the areas of forest policy<br />
and forestry education, Lane-Paole excelled in many other fields including the exploration<br />
and classification of tropical forests in Africa and New Guinea. He was an<br />
unconlmonly tough character whose non-appeasing attitudes to principles in which<br />
he believed at times brought him into sharp conflict with higher authority. Inevitably<br />
he suffered severe setbacks, but he never abandoned the goals he had set himself,<br />
and which in the end he generally achieved.<br />
Born in Sussex, England, in 1885, Lane-Paole received his early education in<br />
Dublin and his forestry training at the French <strong>Forestry</strong> School at Nancy. He went to<br />
South Africa in 1906 and after a year at the South African Forest School served until<br />
1910 as District Forest Officer in the Transvaal. He was then appointed Conservator<br />
of Forests, Sierra Leone, where he renlained until 1916, when he accepted the post of<br />
Conservator of Forests, Western Australia.<br />
In Africa he carried out extensive forest surveys and whilst engaged on this work was<br />
able to indulge his taste for living dangerously. He acquired a reputation for swimnling<br />
crocodile infested rivers, embarking on lone lion hunting expeditions, and capturing<br />
deadly tropical snakes alive. In the latter task he used to good effect the steel hook<br />
that served as a replacenlent for his nlissing left hand. In spite of his single hand he<br />
conducted all his surveys in Africa, and later in New Guinea, alone or with native<br />
bearers, and was very skilful in handling conlplicated survey and other field equipnlent.<br />
He was also an exoert horsenlan.<br />
Lane-Poole was recolnnlended for the position of Conservator of Forests in Western<br />
Australia by Sir David Hutchins who at that tinle occupied a senior forestry post in the<br />
Union of South Africa, and who had been invited to report on forestry 111atters, first<br />
in Western Australia and later in Australia as a ,vhole. Upon taking up his new position,<br />
Lane-Poole, with characteristic vigour, set about re-organising the functions of the<br />
f"orestry Department. One of his early achievements was the fashioning of the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Act, 1918, which gave that State the basis for a sound forest policy and provided for the<br />
dedication of State forests in perpetuity. This Act was to serve as a model for other<br />
States and still stands as a monument to his foresight and ability. He also itnplenlented<br />
a vigorous forest asseSSlnent and classification programme that soon revealed<br />
that fornler estitnates had grossly exaggerated the extent of the State's forest resources,<br />
thus giving even greater urgency to the need for the retention and proper Inanagement<br />
of those areas remaining.<br />
Deeply concerned with the lack of trained staff, he established a school for forest<br />
forenlan and rangers in Western Australia, and in collaboration with foresters in<br />
other States, campaigned vigorously for a National <strong>Forestry</strong> School to provide the<br />
highly trained professional staff of which Australia was desperately short. These<br />
latter endeavours were later to bear fruit with the establishment of the Australian<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> School.<br />
In 1921, Lane-Poole found himself at odds with the Governtnent of the day over<br />
its decision, taken against his advice, to extend concessions and leases held by a large<br />
private tilnber concern, and rather than implement what he considered to be an<br />
incorrect policy, he tendered his resignation. In view of his already considerable<br />
achievements and his high aspirations for the future of forestry in Western Australia,<br />
1
2 N R<br />
c. E. Lane-Poole<br />
this action stands as a highlight of the steadfastness and courage he displayed throughout<br />
his career.<br />
Following his departure from Western Australia, Lane-Poole was engaged by the<br />
COlnmonwealth Governlnent to report on the forest resources of the Territories of<br />
Papua and New Guinea, and during the next two years he carried out extensive solo<br />
explorations in isolated areas where tropical diseases and hostile natives were still<br />
considerable hazards. He endured great physical hardship and at various times was
c. E. LANE-POOLE 3<br />
badly stricken by Inalaria and tropical ulcers. He also had a calnp destroyed by natives<br />
and lost irreplaceable specimens and records as well as one of his native assistants.<br />
The diary notes appended to the comprehensive report he prepared at the end of the<br />
project provide a graphic account of his experiences and of the remote areas he<br />
traversed.<br />
In 1925, Lane-Poole was appointed Forest Adviser to the COlnnl0nwealth Governtnent<br />
and in that same year agreement was reached between the States and the COlnmonwealth<br />
on the establishment ofthe Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School. Although the University<br />
of Adelaide had maintained a School of <strong>Forestry</strong> since 1911, it had never been very<br />
well supported by the State forest services. Under the new arrangement the Comnl0nwealth<br />
agreed to establish, equip and staff a national <strong>Forestry</strong> School in Canberra,<br />
and the States for their part, agreed to support the School by nominating a yearly<br />
number of students more or less proportional to their respective needs. The various<br />
forest services and State universities were all to be represented on a Board of Higher<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Education which would supervise the academic standard of the forestry<br />
course in Canberra.<br />
In 1927, Lane-Poole becanle Inspector-General of Forests of the newly forlned<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau, and also acting Principal of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
School when it opened that year in Canberra. He continued in the latter post until<br />
1944 and retired as Inspector-General in February 1945.<br />
During his eighteen years as Inspector-General of Forests he worked tirelessly to<br />
promote the cause of forestry on a national level. Although the unequivocal stand<br />
he took on some issues was not always conducive to political harmony, his great<br />
ability and wide experience as a forester was fully recognised in forestry circles, and<br />
his collaboration in forestry problems peculiar to the States was frequently sought<br />
and readily given. As a strong protagonist of the need for a national forest policy for<br />
Australia he must have been gratified when, in 1964, an instrument capable of promoting<br />
such a policy at last came into being with the fornlation of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Council which cOtnprises Federal and State Ministers responsible for forestry.<br />
In his role as Principal of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School, Lane-Poole through his<br />
ability as an administrator and lecturer, and by the example ofhis own life and achievetnents,<br />
strongly influenced the students in his charge, and through them the future<br />
progress of Australian forestry. More than a hundred students graduated from the<br />
School during the period he was in charge, and many of his students still occupy<br />
senior positions in the forest services.<br />
Due to the difficult econonlic conditions of the late 1920s and early 1930s the<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> School had to operate on a very meagre budget. Facilities available to staff<br />
and students were limited and it is greatly to Lane-Poole's credit that he was able to<br />
maintain the high academic standards for which the school became well known. He<br />
always took a keen interest in the sporting and social activities of his young charges<br />
and spared no effort to make their sojourn at the school a Inenl0rable and satisfying<br />
experience.<br />
Lane-Poole was the author of more than fifty papers and articles covering both<br />
scientific and more general aspects offorestry. He also represented the COlnmonwealth<br />
Government at many international meetings and attended the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Conferences in 1920, 1923 and 1928. At the first Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held<br />
in London he proposed the resolution which led to the forlnation of the Empire<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Association.<br />
Following his retirement from official forestry in 1945, Lane-Poole was active for<br />
many years as a forestry consultant in Sydney. Failing health and advancing years<br />
finally brought an end to this last phase of his career and he died in Sydney on 22nd<br />
November, 1970, at the age of 85.<br />
Lane-Poole was one of the great pioneers of forestry in Australia whose guiding<br />
principle throughout his professional career is expressed in the motto of the Australian<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> School-Mihi Cura Futuri-I serve posterity.
COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Vol. 50 (1), No. 143, March 1971<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THIS IS the first number of the <strong>Review</strong> to be published in the Association's Golden<br />
Jubilee Year. As Editor we could use the occasion to enlarge on the accomplishments<br />
and on the future of the Association. This would be what is commonly known as<br />
"jumping the gun". We hope that during our Jubilee Year the virtues ofthe Association<br />
will be extolled by abler pens and tongues than ours. We propose to make this Editorial<br />
a simple appeal for support of the various activities arranged to mark our Jubilee Year.<br />
This would appear to be an ideal opportunity to revert to our President's remarks in<br />
his address to the 1970 Annual General Meeting. On that occasion he comlnented on<br />
the fact that our various functions were attended year after year by the same loyal<br />
supporters and asked ourselves as Secretary to make yet another appeal through the<br />
REVIEW for a larger attendance of younger 111enlbers. We therefore appeal to all those<br />
younger members who are based within easy travelling distance of London to make<br />
the effort and join that band ofloyal supporters referred to by our President. Attendance<br />
at the last three Annual General Meetings has hovered around the fifty mark. Looking<br />
through our membership list we feel this figure could easily be doubled if members<br />
will make the effort. We can assure any neWCOlners that they are certain to meet some<br />
oftheir contemporaries or colleagues or make the acquaintance ofothers they have only<br />
met "on paper".<br />
This year's Annual General Meeting wiIJ be held on Tuesday, 27th April and will<br />
be the important event of our Jubilee Year. At successive Annual General Meetings<br />
in recent years it has been customary to follow the business of the 111eeting with a talk<br />
or talks by one or more distinguished guest speakers. On the occasion of our Jubilee<br />
Meeting the intention is that the post-meeting talks will be of a domestic nature. Our<br />
Vice-Chairman, Professor M. V. Laurie, will review the history and accomplishments<br />
of the Association during the past half century. We ourselves will follow Professor<br />
Laurie with our views on the future of the Association leading the way to what we hope<br />
will develop into a conversazione with full participation from the floor. WiIJ all members<br />
who have any ideas or criticisms which may benefit the Association or illlprove the<br />
REVIEW please conle prepared to air their views.<br />
The actual anniversary date of the founding of the Association is 16th November.<br />
On or near that date it is proposed to hold a commemorative dinner in London provided<br />
sufficient support is forthcoming. Our records show that on the last occasion the<br />
Association arranged a formal dinner at the Connaught Rooms in 1939 no less than<br />
59 members attended, there were no ladies present. On this occasion ladies will be<br />
welcome as guests and it should not be difficult to exceed the former attendance, if we<br />
are to justify inviting one or more distinguished guests it is essential that we do.<br />
Please rally round
6 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Richard Willan and his wife have just returned from a tour of Malawi, Rhodesia and<br />
South Africa. Richard was Chief Conservator, Malawi (Nyasaland as it was then) from<br />
1947-61.<br />
A. Wo'ffsohn having completed his F.A.O. contract term in Korea has now accepted<br />
another F.A.O. assignment in Nicaragua. He does not say on what he will be engaged.<br />
Society of THE COUNCIL of the Society of American Foresters on 16th October,<br />
American 1970 unanimously elected Mr. F. C. Ford Robertson of Oxford,<br />
Foresters Honours England to Honorary Membership. Persons elected to this member-<br />
F. C. Ford ship grade must be: (1) nonforesters who have made outstanding<br />
Robertson and well-known contributions to forestry in America or abroad<br />
(statesmen, conservationists, and civic leaders); or (2) professional<br />
foresters of outstanding achievenlent who are not citizens of the United States, its<br />
possessions or Canada. This honour is shared by only 31 other living persons.<br />
Mr. Ford Robertson, a long-titne professional forester, has an outstanding record in<br />
international forestry. Beginning his professional career in the Indian Forest Service<br />
in 1924, he later served as Chief of Silvicultural Research for the United Provinces. In<br />
1947 he was appointed Editor-in-Chief of <strong>Forestry</strong> Abstracts. As an active member of<br />
the Joint Comnlittee on Bibliography and Terminology of the Food and Agriculture<br />
Organisation of the United Nations and the International Union of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research<br />
Organisations, he contributed substantially in developing the Oxford System of<br />
Classification of <strong>Forestry</strong> literature. From December, 1964 to February, 1970 he served<br />
as Editor-Director for the basic English-language version of the Multilingual <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Ternlinology.<br />
Director THE MINISTER of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has appointed<br />
Kew Gardens Professor John Heslop-Harrison, M.Sc., Ph.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.,<br />
F.R.S.E., M.R.LA., F.L.S., F.I.Biol. to succeed Sir George Taylor,<br />
D.Sc., F.R.S., F.R.S.E., F.L.S., V.M.H., as Director of the Royal Botanic Gardens,<br />
Kew. Professor Heslop-Harrison will take up his appointment on 1st June, 1971.<br />
Sir George Taylor, who was appointed in 1956, will retire on 31 st May, 1971.<br />
British Columbia F. s. MCKINNON has retired as Deputy Minister of Forests. He is<br />
Personnel Moves succeeded by J. S. Stokes. N. A. McRae has been appointed<br />
Assistant Chief Forester and in his forlller post of District Forester,<br />
Prince George District, is succeeded by W. Young.<br />
FORESTRY COMMISSION NEWS<br />
Chain-Saws and WE PUBLISH in full the following information sheet recently issued<br />
Vibration by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission. We recommend it for detailed study<br />
Syndrome by anyone responsible for employees likely to be affected:<br />
November 1970<br />
There is now sufficient evidence to show that most chain-saw operators begin to<br />
notice a form of vibration effect known as "white fingers" after they have regularly<br />
used a fixed handle chain-saw for two to five years, and that continued use of a fixed<br />
handle chain-saw leads to worsening effects of white fingers. This does not apply,<br />
however, to occasional users, who have not noticed the effect.
NOTES AND COMMENTS 7<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission has been investigating this problem for son1e time now<br />
with the help of British experts in medicine, ergonomics, engineering, sound and<br />
vibration, as well as studying reports and meeting experts from other countries.<br />
During this time, some chain-saw manufacturers have redesigned their saws to<br />
incorporate anti-vibration rubber or spring bushes between both the handles and<br />
the saw engine and cutting unit; these saws have very much lower vibration levels<br />
than the fixed handle saws. Criteria for safe levels of vibration acceptable to man<br />
have been produced for chain-saws with factors which allow for variation in duration<br />
of usage per day and for interruptions in working during the day. Most of the new<br />
anti-vibration chain-saws have vibration levels within, or close to, this criteria.<br />
Taking all this information into account, the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission is ofthe opinion<br />
that the spread of vibration effects can be halted (or prevented in the case of men<br />
who have not noticed white finger effects to date), if suitable anti-vibration saws<br />
are used by regular operators, subject to these operators also following certain<br />
techniques and personal disciplines when they are working.<br />
The guidance supplied by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission to these regular operators is as<br />
follows:<br />
The new anti-vibration saws are within safe levels of vibration, provided that<br />
five aspects ofsaw usage are also retnembered and carried out; these are:<br />
(1) Good techniques for felling, cross-cutting and debranching with lightweight<br />
saws include resting the saw as much as possible on the tree (or occasionally<br />
on your thigh); this means that some of the vibration is absorbed by the tree<br />
or the large n1uscles of your thigh. Holding the saw as lightly as possible, when<br />
it is at full throttle, without of course reducing effective control of the saw,<br />
will also reduce vibration absorbed into your hands.<br />
(2) Wearing chain-saw gloves spreads the grip over a larger area of your hand.<br />
(Four pairs per 1l1an should be provided so that a dry pair is available after<br />
each break.)<br />
(3) Good blood circulation to the arn1S and hands gives maxiInum protection to<br />
the flesh, nerves and bones in the hands, and this is achieved by warming up<br />
before starting the saw, and by wearing suitable clothing and gloves. This<br />
applies to the whole body, so wear extra clothing during breaks from cutting.<br />
(4) Sprockets, guide bars, and chains should be well maintained and chains should<br />
be correctly sharpened with the recommended clearance for the depth gauge.<br />
Poor maintenance increases vibration by as ll1uch as one-third of the normal<br />
level for the saw.<br />
(5) Every tin1e during which the saw is idling or stopped, gives your hands and<br />
arms a chance to recover frolll the temporary effects of vibration. The nlore<br />
evenly breaks in saw usage can be spread throughout the day, the less the risk<br />
of any disconlfort in your hands. Try to organise the stops for fuel, sharpening,<br />
meals, piling of timber or other work so that the saw is switched off for at least<br />
ten Ininutes as often as possible during the day, rather than a few, longer<br />
stoppages.<br />
Research will continue to validate the safe levels of vibration criteria, to further<br />
reduce vibration levels of saws and to find ways of alleviating the white finger<br />
effects.<br />
Occasional users are recol11111ended to follow the five points listed, especially if<br />
they are using a fixed handle saw.<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission plan to change over completely to anti-vibration<br />
saws by theend of 1971.<br />
25 SavileRow,<br />
London WIX 2AY.<br />
* * * * * * *
Eucalyptus<br />
Coppice for<br />
Chip Material<br />
NOTES AND COMMENTS 9<br />
Satisfactory experiments in the use of this chemical have recently been carried out<br />
at Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. Full details have been written up by J. E.<br />
Brown, Research Officer, Department of Fisheries and <strong>Forestry</strong>, Petawawa Forest<br />
Experiment Station, Chalk River, Ontario.<br />
EXTRACT FROM Forest Products Newsletter No. 376, e.S.I.R.O.,<br />
Melbourne:<br />
With the increasing consumption of wood fibre for the production<br />
of paper, paperboard, fibreboard, and particleboard,<br />
more serious attention is being paid throughout the world to the growing offibre as a<br />
short-rotation crop. There is rising interest in the planting of quick-growing tree<br />
species, the application of fertilizer and irrigation techniques, the utilization of parts<br />
of the tree other than the merchantable bole, and the increased use of waste and<br />
residue material.<br />
Under appropriate conditions eucalypts are capable of rapid growth and can<br />
produce exceptional yields. Many species are able to regenerate by coppicing and the<br />
increment of coppice shoots is higher than that of trees grown from sowing or<br />
planting.<br />
The Division of Forest Products is particularly interested in this problem, and<br />
during 1969 commenced an investigation into the possibilities of using a coppicegrown<br />
eucalypt as a source of chip material. Eucalyptus viminalis was chosen for<br />
study because it has a wide distribution in south-eastern Australia, coppices readily,<br />
and exhibits marked genetic variation.<br />
New Zealand - G. S. BROWN, Local Honorary Secretary, New Zealand, reports<br />
A New <strong>Forestry</strong> plans for the publication of a new journal, New Zealand Journal<br />
Publication of<strong>Forestry</strong> Science, the first number of which is expected to appear<br />
in mid 1971. It will be edited and produced by the Forest Research<br />
Institute, Rotorua. It will be available for a wide range of forestry subjects and to<br />
contributors from the Forest Service, other Government Departments, and industry.<br />
Contributions for the first issue should be submitted by 31 January, 1971 to The Editor,<br />
New Zealand Journal of <strong>Forestry</strong> Science, Forest Research Institute, Private Bag,<br />
Rotorua.<br />
V.A.C.O. DURING THE past few years many items of interest have appeared<br />
Timber <strong>Review</strong> in these columns covering new uses of tropical timbers and in<br />
particular the lesser known or secondary hardwoods of West<br />
Africa. V.A.C.O. Timber <strong>Review</strong> No. 19 published in December gives further information<br />
on the various items already covered. This booklet also reprints a thoughtprovoking<br />
article by Dr. H. C. Dawkins:<br />
The Future of Industrial Cellulose: Unlimited or End in Sight? Not all will<br />
agree with Dr. Dawkins, at the same time his theory commands respect and is<br />
deserving of detailed examination.<br />
This booklet is available from United Africa (Timber) Ltd., United Africa House,<br />
Blackfriars Road, London, S.E.l.<br />
Brachystegia UNITED AFRICA co. (TIMBER) LTD. say that of the less well known<br />
Substitute species of hardwoods that they are currently evaluating in West<br />
for Oak Africa and at Holmes (Wragby) Ltd., Wragby, Lincs., they regard<br />
the species okwen as a most promising example. Although it is<br />
not in the tradition of beautiful woods which many regard as the hallmark of West<br />
African timbers, nevertheless they see a place for it as a substitute for oak.<br />
2
10 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
They are backed in this thinking by the Forest Products Research Department at<br />
Ibadan and the Nigerian Timber Association who have published the following strength<br />
and weight comparisons to show its suitability as an oak substitute:<br />
Weight Max. Compression Modulus Hardness<br />
at 12 bending parallel of side<br />
per cent. to grain elasticity grain<br />
Ib./sq. in. Ib./sq. in. X J031b./ lb.<br />
M.C. sq. in.<br />
I<br />
Okwen ... ... ... 42 14,400 7,940 1,640 1,430<br />
European oak ... ... 43 13,300 7,210 1,590 1,230<br />
Teak ... ... ... 43 14,300 8,320 1,850 1,130<br />
Scots pine ... ... 32 12,000 6,640 1,560 680<br />
Okwen (Brachystegia spp.), was formerly regarded by Nigerian foresters as a<br />
nuisance tree occupying a far greater area than its value justified. We do however,<br />
remember a particularly fine log being sawn into two-inch planks which were later<br />
manufactured into church pews and donated to a local church by the firln of Messrs.<br />
Brandler and Rylke then operating in Eastern Nigeria (circa 1960).<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> AS REPORTED in the December <strong>Review</strong> the <strong>Forestry</strong> Association<br />
Association of of Nigeria was duly founded at 'an Inaugural Conference in<br />
Nigeria Ibadan on 6th-9th October, 1970.<br />
The conference was held at the Conference Centre, University<br />
of Ibadan and was a great success. There were over 200 people at the formal opening<br />
which was performed by Mr. F. H. E. Brisibie, Commissioner of Police, on behalf of<br />
His Excellency Brigadier R. A. Adebayo, Military Governor of the Western State of<br />
Nigeria. A copy of His Excellency's opening speech is attached. (See "Around the<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong>.")<br />
At the General Meeting following the opening ceremony the formal resolution to<br />
form the <strong>Forestry</strong> Association of Nigeria was proposed by Chief H. A. Akinloye and<br />
seconded by Mr. J. L. Ladipo to general acclaim, and the Constitution was adopted.<br />
The following were elected into the offices of the Association:<br />
Office Name<br />
President Mr. J. L. Ladipo, Chief Conservator of Forests, Western<br />
State, Ibadan.<br />
1st Vice-President MaIlam Musa Daggash, Chairolan of the Federal Tenders<br />
Board.<br />
2nd Vice-President Chief M. I. Agbontaen, Vice-President, Nigerian Tinlber<br />
Association.<br />
Secretary Mr. J. F. Redhead, F.A.O. Liaison Officer and Ag. Head,<br />
Department of<strong>Forestry</strong>, University oflbadan.<br />
Asst. Secretary Mr. A. O. Adekunle, Conservator of Forests, Western State,<br />
Ibadan.<br />
Treasurer Mr. J. O. Ebuade-Iyamabo, Conservator of Forests, Mid-<br />
Western State, Benin City.<br />
Editor Mr. C. F. A. Onochie, Chief Planning Officer, Federal Department<br />
of<strong>Forestry</strong>, Ibadan.<br />
Memory Lane MANY OF our members who served in Nigeria would have been<br />
in Nigeria present in Ibadan when D. R. Rosevear, first and last Inspector-<br />
General of Forests, to mark his retirement from the post (1954),<br />
planted an Obechi tree. That tree was featured in the 1970 Christmas card issued by<br />
the Federal Department of Forest Research. Rosevear and his contemporaries will be<br />
interested to know that this tree of perfect form would appear to be approximately<br />
100 foot in height and 6 foot b.h.g. Perhaps Ibadan will let us have the exact figures.
NOTES AND COMMENTS 11<br />
D.S.I.P. ACCORDING TO the General Manager of Lever's Pacific Timbers,<br />
Log Shipments Mr. M. Collins, over one hundred thousand cubic feet oflogs (more<br />
to Australia than one million superficial feet) was shipped recently from<br />
Kololnbangara to Australia on the Kokusei Maru. This is<br />
understood to be the largest single shipment of logs yet made to Australia from the<br />
Solomons, or from PapuajNew Guinea. They are to be used mainly in plywood<br />
manufacture in Brisbane and Sydney.<br />
Considerable publicity, including television coverage and an article in the Australian<br />
Financial <strong>Review</strong>, was given to the arrival of the logs. They are being supplied at<br />
cheaper prices than similar tropical hardwood logs from Sabah, and it is hoped that<br />
this shipment will lead to considerable expansion oflog exports to Australia.<br />
Mr. K. W. Trenaman, the Conservator of Forests, comments that a number of small<br />
shiplTIents has previously been nlade to Australia, New Zealand and other countries,<br />
but that Japan has been, and is expected to remain, the largest buyer of timber from<br />
the Solomons. However, if a second large market in Australia can be secured, this will<br />
be a Inost welcollle and important development.<br />
Association WE ARE indebted to Mr. G. J. Pleydell of United Africa Company<br />
Technique (Timber) Limited for a report on the A.T.I.B.T. Autumn Meeting<br />
Internationale Des in Paris. Although sonlewhat lengthy we publish it in full as it<br />
Bois Tropicaux contains nluch of importance to tropical foresters and all concerned<br />
with tropical hardwoods:<br />
The autumn meeting of the Association Technique Internationale des Bois<br />
Tropicaux was held in Paris on 27th and 28th October, 1970 at the Centre Technique<br />
du Bois, under the chairnlanship of Mr. Peche, General President, assisted by<br />
Mr. Catinot, General Secretary.<br />
Men belonging by profession to the various sectors concerned with tropical<br />
timber in all its aspects-production, marketing, utilisation-representing 15<br />
out of the 20 countries which are Inembers of the A.T.I.B.T., took part in the work<br />
of the various Commissions and studied the problems set before them.<br />
In opening the meeting Mr. Peche thanked the Centre Technique du Bois and its<br />
Director, Mr. Collardet, for their renewed hospitality in offering the Association<br />
a place in which to hold its nleetings and expressed pleasure at seeing the particularly<br />
large nUlnber of participants.<br />
The work of the COlnmissions then proceeded in the order that had been adopted.<br />
ComlTIission V, responsible for the grading and seasoning of tropical timber and<br />
under the chairmanship of Mr. CoIlardet, first examined the circumstances in<br />
which a delTIonstration of the methods of grading rough logs and sawn timber from<br />
the Far East might be organised.<br />
It then studied how the tropical sawn timber market might be affected by Great<br />
Britain's request that the use of British measurements in commercial transactions<br />
be abandoned in favour of the metric systerTI and, in the case of sawn timber, in<br />
favour of new sizes of sawn pieces.<br />
The finishing touches were put to a list of currently used tropical species that<br />
are susceptible to attack by clean pin holes.<br />
The commercial grading of varieties of Meranti continued to be studied and a<br />
report was finally made on the progress achieved with the multilingual dictionary<br />
giving the terminology of defects.<br />
Commission Ill, entrusted with transport and handling matters and presided over<br />
by Mr. Wood, first dealt with the problem of parcelling sawn timber; in this<br />
connection harmonisation of the rules adopted by the various Shipping Line Conferences<br />
would be desirable. It then listened to a report by Mr. R. C. Roberts of<br />
Palm Line Limited on the future trends in the maritime transport of timber, the<br />
types of ships required for timber and the cost of freight.
12 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
The Chairman of Palm Line Limited, Mr. D. J. Nielson was also present at the<br />
meeting. During the discussion that followed Mr. R. C. Roberts's itnportant address,<br />
the Commission stressed the significant part played by freight and its cost in the<br />
tropical timber trade.<br />
Within the framework of Commission VII, presided over by Mr. Gimon and<br />
responsible for relations with the international organisations and research bodies,<br />
Mr. Erfurth of the Food and Agricultural Organisation gave an account of the<br />
activities of the F.A.O. in the forestry and timber sector. Mr. Catinot then reported<br />
on the forest inventories that had been carried out in tropical Africa, the inventories<br />
being carried out and planned, their special features and the results that might be<br />
expected by men in the trade. They were particularly concerned that these results<br />
should be expressed as a volume of marketable timber.<br />
In the course of the discussion of the work of Commission IV (Contracts and<br />
Usages), under the chairmanship of Mr. Hoornaert, two important exchanges ofview<br />
took place. The first related to the possibility of a consignment being refused in<br />
the event of a delivery of timber inferior to the quality specified in the contract; the<br />
Commission adopted a usage which applies on the one hand to the types of contract<br />
generally used in English-speaking countries and on the other hand to the A.T.I.B.T.<br />
standard contracts used on the European continent. The second exchange of views<br />
related to the drafting ofan arbitration clause which the A.T.I.B.T. standard contracts<br />
and the contracts in use in English-speaking countries might have in common;<br />
considerable progress was made in this direction.<br />
Commission VI (Use of tropical timber), presided over by Mr. Roth, first heard<br />
a report by Mr. Morellet of the Centre Technique Forestier Tropical (C.T.F.T.) on<br />
the enquiry carried out among members of the A.T.I.B.T. on Aniegre. This enquiry,<br />
which made it possible to define the problems posed by the use of this species, may<br />
serve as a model for the enquiries regarding other species that are not yet well known.<br />
A report by Mr. PoH, Assistant Director of the Centre d'Information et de Documentation<br />
du Batiment (Building Information Centre), gave rise to a very interesting<br />
discussion on the means to be adopted to give buyers and users a better knowledge<br />
of tropical species.<br />
An address by Mr. Chardin (C.T.F.T.), together with a particularly significant film,<br />
on the use of high speed cinematography in examining the mechanism of rotary<br />
cutting greatly interested the listeners. This address and the reports by Mr. Bertrand<br />
(C.T.F.T.) on the competition between timber and plastics, by Mr. Poliquin, a<br />
professor at Laval University (Quebec, Canada), on the new prospects for the tropical<br />
timber market in the V.S.A., and by Mr. Gehain (INDUFOR) on the present<br />
position of Limba gave rise to interesting discussions on technical, economic and<br />
commercial problems.<br />
Commissions I and II, entrusted with information, statistical, publication and<br />
publicity problems, were under the joint chairmanship of Miss Morgand and<br />
Mr. Poutie. They considered the problems ofpublicising tropical species-problems<br />
which could perhaps be solved by a drive in collaboration with other organisationsand<br />
they decided to reprint the General Nomenclature of Tropical Timber.<br />
The Council of Management then ratified the proposals made by the various<br />
Commissions and recorded the membership of two new active members. After the<br />
report by the Treasurer, Mr. Vivier, who was heartily congratulated for his work<br />
in that office, the General President, Mr. Peche, closed the meeting by thanking<br />
the participants and expressing the wish that he might see them again in even<br />
greater numbers, if possible, at the spring meeting.<br />
At the end of this meeting, which was particularly fruitful and during which<br />
many problems concerning tropical timber had been thoroughly examined, the<br />
Federation Nationale des Importateurs, Negociants, Industriels, Commissionnaires<br />
et Exportateurs en bois exotiques, tropicaux et americains (National Federation<br />
of Far Eastern, tropical and American timber importers, merchants, industrialists,
Section 23,<br />
I.U.F.R.O.<br />
Meeting<br />
NOTES AND COMMENTS 13<br />
brokers and exporters) gave a highly successful and friendly cocktail party for the<br />
participants at the meeting and various French and international personalities in<br />
the trade.<br />
THE SECTION 23, Improvement of Forest Production (Silviculture),<br />
of the International Union of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research Organization met<br />
at Ljublijana, Yugoslavia, in early October. The resolution of the<br />
working group on virgin forest research emphasised the urgency of<br />
preserving primary forest areas in tropical developing countries. The working group<br />
on tropical silviculture decided on a work programme which is chiefly directed toward<br />
dissemination of information and improving contacts among researchers in the field of<br />
tropical silviculture and related subjects of tropical forestry.<br />
Ethiopia THE BRITISH OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION has agreed to<br />
provide the Government of Ethiopia with a team of three <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Advisers for a period of years.<br />
Christopher Swabey, after five years as Director of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Bureau in Oxford will lead the team. He has gone out to Addis Ababa, initially for a<br />
year. He will be accompanied by J. A. D. Jackson, formerly of Nigeria. A third British<br />
forester will join the team in the near future.<br />
Teak Project THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK has approved a technical assistance<br />
Indonesia programme requested by the Indonesian Government to study<br />
and prepare plans for the rehabilitation and development of<br />
Indonesia's teak industry in Central and East Java.<br />
This technical assistance is the Bank's first venture in the forestry sector, and is in<br />
line with the current Five-Year Development Plan of the Indonesian Government to<br />
improve the development and exploitation of the country's rich timber resources.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> in WE RECENTLY received a copy of the biography of Kim It Sung,<br />
North Korea Communist leader of North Korea. As tnembers will be aware<br />
Korea was occupied by the Japanese froln 1911 till 1945. An uneasy<br />
peace followed leading up to the Korean War 1950-53 which after United Nation<br />
intervention resulted in the division of the country along the 38th parallel into North<br />
and South Korea.<br />
As the Association is above politics we browsed through this very lengthy book<br />
and came up with the following references to forestry:<br />
"Imnlediately after liberation he had climbed the MoonsoobongHill and was<br />
greatly grieved looking over the hills and dales of the fatherland which had been<br />
completely denuded of trees by the plunderous Japanese imperialists during their<br />
long rule.<br />
He said at that time that tree-planting and afforestation must be undertaken<br />
large-scale.<br />
So he worked out a vast plan for afforestation and conservation, with river<br />
inlprovement, and guided the people to fulfil the plan wherever he went.<br />
In the northern half of the Republic, a plan to plant 880,000 jungbo with trees<br />
was carried out quickly after the war. Mountains that had been made bare by the<br />
long-drawn catastrophe of so many years of Japanese imperialism were clothed<br />
again with green garments for the first time in those more than 30 years".<br />
The above sounds a grand concept; if any members have contacts in North Korea<br />
we should welcome further infornlation. In the meantime we are making a direct<br />
approach to Pyongyang.<br />
(one hectare === 1.01 jungbo)
16 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Literature published after 1964<br />
It is hoped in future to film the catalogue in five year blocks. The first block,<br />
covering the period 1965-70, will be available in late 1971 and will incorporate and<br />
supersede the microfilm already published covering the period 1965-67/68.<br />
Author Catalogue of Literature published between 1934 and 1968-69<br />
About 150,000 cards on 28 reels, £196 plus package and postage.<br />
Orders should be placed with the Microfilm Units, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Oxford.<br />
Multilingual WE ARE RELIABLY informed that this publication is likely to appear<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> "any day now". As previously reported it will be distributed by<br />
Terminology W. Heffer & Sons Ltd., Hills Road, Cambridge and the Society of<br />
AmericanForesters, 1010 16thStreetN.W.,WashingtonD.C.,V.S.A.<br />
Annual General THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING will be held on Tuesday, 27th<br />
Meeting April. Agenda and invitation form are enclosed with this issue.<br />
Assuming the postal strike is over, members in the United Kingdo111<br />
should have not less than 5 weeks' notice. This being the Association's Jubilee Year<br />
the discussion after the business of the meeting will be devoted to the Association and<br />
its future.<br />
Autumn<br />
Meeting<br />
Jubilee<br />
Dinner<br />
NO VENUE has yet been fixed for the Autulnn Meeting. It will<br />
however, take place about mid-September. Details and invitation<br />
form will be issued with the June REVIEW.<br />
AS MENTIONED in the December REVIEW and in the Editorial in<br />
this number, it is hoped to hold a commemorative dinner in or<br />
about mid-November provided sufficient support is forthcolning.<br />
Members will find a notice in this number seeking advance inforJnation as to possible<br />
support.<br />
Revisi'on of THE DECEMBER REVIEW will be d'evoted to a revised version of<br />
Handbook the Handbook. A form inviting a]l individual members to send<br />
in any changes of address, designations e1tc. is enclosed with this<br />
number. If no reply is received it will be assumed there is no change. Forest<br />
Authorities, Research Organisations and Universities have been asked for details<br />
by individual letters.<br />
Postal Strike AS WE GO to press the strike is still with us. Thanks to our<br />
Postscript printers who have maintained an excellent courier service between<br />
London and Windsor there is every reason to believe this issue<br />
will appear on time.
OBITUARIES<br />
Major F. V. Webster, M.C. (1901-1969)<br />
FREDERICK VERNON WEBSTER was born at Mussorie in India, in 1901 where his father<br />
was serving in the army. After schooling in India he entered the <strong>Forestry</strong> College at<br />
Dehra Dun and on completion of his forestry training joined the Burma Forest Service<br />
in 1926. The outbreak of the war found hiln in northern Burnla and he made his way<br />
to India and volunteered for military service. His experience of the people and forests<br />
of Burma made him an invaluable member of "Z" force operating behind the Japanese<br />
lines and it was for his part in these operations that he was awarded the M.C. After<br />
the war he returned to Burma for a short while but changed conditions led him to seek<br />
employnlent elsewhere and in August 1948 he joined the North Borneo Forest Depart<br />
Olent. He stayed in North Borneo for the remainder of his working life retiring to<br />
England in August 1960. Monty or Web as he was known to his friends was a keen<br />
and in his younger days skilled sportsman. His particular love was cricket, which<br />
he continued to play until shortly before his retirement and which he followed with<br />
enthusiasm whenever possible.<br />
Shortly after retiring he suffered from a severe coronary thrombosis and was forced<br />
to lead a quiet life in retirement at Westfield in Sussex. In 1963 he married Dorothy<br />
Mayor, who survives hinl and to whom we extend our deepest sympathy.<br />
rrhomas Valentine Dent (1909-1970)<br />
WE REGRET to announce the death ofT. V. Dent, l.F.S.(Retd.) who died while attending<br />
a council meeting of the Yorkshire Naturalists' trust at York University on 11 th<br />
April 1970, exactly a week after his retirenlent from the services of the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
COllll11ission.<br />
The youngest officer to join the Indian Forest Service, Dent canle to India in October<br />
1929 and spent his first five years as a junior officer in North Bengal and in the Sunderbans<br />
and was, incidentally, instrumental in routing a group of determined rhino<br />
poachers as well as a rogue rhino, at Jaldapara. Soon after, he became the Khedda<br />
Officer and operated extensively in the Chittagong forests which were literally the<br />
home of wild elephants. Subsequent two years' arduous life as the Divisional Forest<br />
Officer, Chittagong Hill Tracts nearly cost him his life, afflicted as he was by the ITIuch<br />
dreaded Black Water Fever, but through the dedicated nursing of Frank Dent he<br />
survived. Next, he spent a couple of years as an Assistant Silviculturist at Dehra Dun<br />
(1940-42) and during the brief span, managed to publish an important SiIvicultural<br />
bulletin. He was a competent field botanist and a complete naturalist.<br />
With the evacuation of the British froln Burma he was recalled to Chittagong<br />
to shoulder the onerous task of the supply of colossal quantities of timber to the<br />
ArnlY at the front line that the Division became. A few months before India gained<br />
independence, he went to England on leave for a well-earned rest, little apprehending<br />
that he was leaving this country for good! Subsequently, he was absorbed in the<br />
Service of the U.K., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission wherefrom he had retired only on 4th<br />
April, 1970.<br />
Dent had an enviable iron constitution; and about physical hardships he could never<br />
care less. He was a good sportsnlan, and his shooting was accurate. His bag included<br />
several tigers and panthers. Yet his rugged exterior concealed a very tender heart that<br />
was incapable of being rude. He was considerate to a fault and it was a common sight<br />
in the early hours of the morning, to see Dent dashing in a jeep down the strand with<br />
a load of Foresters bound for the embarkation point, some eight miles from Chittagong,<br />
for their voyage to Cox's Bazar-on the country's eastern border, to report for<br />
duty. But for his help the poor staff would have had to trudge the weary miles to the<br />
wharf as cabs were not to be had for love or money in war time.<br />
He had recently informed his old colleagues about his desire to visit North Bengal,<br />
filled as it was for him with nostalgic memories, on his way to Australia where his<br />
17
18 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
son has settled down. This makes the bereavement all the more poignant, to those<br />
here who looked forward to meeting him again. He had boundless love for this country<br />
and her people.<br />
To his widow, son and the three daughters, we offer our deeply felt condolence.<br />
K.C.R.C.<br />
John Alexander Fraser<br />
JOHN ALEXANDER FRASER was born in Ross-shire, Scotland, in 1909. He was brought<br />
up in the ways of country life and chose forestry as his career, obtaining the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Commission's Foresters Certificate at Benmore. In 1936 he arrived in Uganda to begin<br />
thirty years of unstinted service to forestry overseas, divided almost equally between<br />
Uganda and Tanzania.<br />
His senior officers soon found that Fraser set himself a high standard and over the<br />
years this was the hallmark of his work. Whatever the task, whether settling forest<br />
boundary disputes, collecting wild rubber as part of Uganda's war effort, managing<br />
large hardwood nursery and replanting schemes or taking charge of softwood planting<br />
under a taungya system, his alert and practical mind grasped the essentials and his<br />
energy and drive ensured that they were carried out, and carried out well.<br />
Fraser's capability and integrity made it natural that he should be one of the select<br />
band of Foresters in what was then Tanganyika to be promoted on merit to the rank<br />
of Assistant Conservator. It was in this grade and in charge of forestry in Tanzania's<br />
varied and exacting East Region that he finished his overseas service in 1966 and retired<br />
to Scotland. He died of a heart attack on 7th November, 1970.<br />
Far from being a stern perfectionist, Fraser enjoyed living and his many friends of<br />
several races will remember with affection his zest and cheerful companionship. He<br />
was a devoted husband and father and our sympathy goes to his widow and son and<br />
daughter in their great loss.<br />
R.G.S.<br />
Obituary Notices on R. R. Waterer and Dr. MacLagan Gorrie are unavoidably<br />
held over due to the postal strike.<br />
NEW MEMBERS<br />
CRACIUM, G. C. J., B.Sc., M.Sc., G.P.O. Box 589, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.<br />
ELLIS, D. S., M.B.E., B.Sc.For., Edgerton, 14 Hillhead, Bonnyrigg, Midlothian.<br />
GILMOUR, D. A., B.Sc.For., Dip.For., M.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Atherton, Queensland,<br />
Australia.<br />
HOWELL, B. N., M.A.(Cantab.), Spitchwick Manor, Poundsgate, Newton Abbot, Devon.<br />
JHA, B. C., B.Sc.(Hon.), A.I.F.C., Finnish Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland.<br />
MINCHIN, A. A. F., Dip.For.(Oxon.), Cruxfield House, Near Duns, Berwickshire.<br />
STEVENS, H. E., B.Sc.For., R,P,F,ffi C.E.T., 3554 West 22nd Avenue, Vancouver 8, British<br />
Columbia, Canada.<br />
STIRLING, Lt.Col. J. A., O.B.E., F.I.C.E., M.lnst.H.E., F.I.Arb., 31 Fordwich Road, Welwyn<br />
Garden City, Herts.<br />
WESTBROEK, H., B.Sc.F., RRI, Steeles East Toronto, P.O. Box 56, Milliken, Ontario, Canada.
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 23 .<br />
the wide-spread use of timber preservation processes have helped a great deal to<br />
conserve the indigenous forests by making it possible to slow dow ntheir rate of<br />
depletion. Since 1946 the amount of timber cut from the "exotic" forests is estimated<br />
to have represented a saving of nearly 750,000 acres of indigenous forest, and" the use<br />
of preservative even more than that.<br />
The AucklandHerald of 10th October has quoted some of the sayings ofthe Minister<br />
of Land and Forests, Duncan McIntyre, which may be worth re-quoting here:<br />
"With their system of tapu, the Maoris introduced conservation."<br />
"There are large areas in New Zealand we should give back to God and we should<br />
apologise for the mess we have made ... even offer to help him repair the damage."<br />
"The politician is your mouthpiece; if you are interested in the environment, he<br />
must be."<br />
"Man is the most noxious animal ever introduced into New Zealand."<br />
"How many of you could still get more excitement out of... rain on a tin roof than<br />
the broadcast from Parliament ?"<br />
"Plant trees for your lives."<br />
"The battle-cry of conservation is good to hear, but would be even better if some<br />
of those shouting the loudest had a clearer idea of what they were shouting for."<br />
"People who love the land do not abuse it."<br />
"It is the wooing of the earth that we must aspire to."<br />
"We must reconcile two conflicting elements-taking enough profit from our land<br />
to give us a good living and protecting that same land to give us a good life."<br />
"We Kiwis can have a paradise here in our own land if we plan and if we are prepared<br />
to pay the price."<br />
NIGERIA<br />
Speech by His Excellency The Military Governor of The Western State<br />
To The <strong>Forestry</strong> Association of Nigeria on the occasion of its launching ceremony.<br />
DISTINGUISHED GUESTS, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,<br />
I am delighted to be in your midst this morning and to have the opportunity of<br />
addressing your inaugural meeting. I welcome each and everyone of you to Ibadan<br />
and wish you a happy stay here. I congratulate you heartily for forming this Association.<br />
It is my belief that it will offer a virile forum where forestry problems will be<br />
discussed and solved. I am certain you have a wealth of knowledge and very rich experience<br />
in tropical forestry that the outside world is eager to tap. It is through the<br />
journal of the Association, which I am informed you will start publishing soon, that<br />
these vital information and knowledge will be disseminated to the outside world.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> in this country today has entered a phase of intensive management. In the<br />
past your activities centred on acquiring the forest estate and protecting it. Now that<br />
you have the Estate, you are actively engaged in developing it to support the needs<br />
of the teeming population in this country. Because the products of the forests are<br />
intimately connected with the lives of the ordinary people you occupy a unique place<br />
in subscribing substantially to the general well being of the inhabitants of this country.<br />
The export of timber alone, I am told, earns about £7 million in foreign exchange every<br />
year and about ten times this value from a variety of minor forest products including<br />
wood carvings, palm oil and kernels, gum arabic, species, wild animals and animal<br />
trophies. A vital service which the forests render the ordinary village man and which<br />
we do not appreciate enough is the provision of herbs and barks for the preparation of<br />
native medicine. A good proportion of the population collects herbs and barks of<br />
trees for concoctions and medicinal preparations since the medical facilities are<br />
inadequate in these areas.<br />
It is gratifying to note that every State Government in the Federation has embarked<br />
upon extensive afforestation programmes. I am informed that you are employing the<br />
latest innovations and techniques in growing quickly timber that you will soon be<br />
called upon to supply industries in this country. In this connection I shall mention
24 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
the proposed establishment of pulp and paper mills in various parts of the country.<br />
You are aware of the colossal amount of money spent in importing paper and paper<br />
products into Nigeria yearly and I am happy to note that the Federal Government<br />
is committed to activating and establishing local paper industries to supply our<br />
demands of these products. My government is also raising 2,000 acres of Gmelina<br />
trees annually for a proposed Gmelina pulp mill. This mill and paper complex will<br />
provide some 36 million cement bags annually when fully established. I am pleased<br />
to learn that our Forest Services all over the country are planting large areas ofTropical<br />
Pines and other species which are most suitable for pulp manufacture.<br />
Other wood based industries also call for mention here. Two new plymill complexes<br />
are proposed for the West and Mid-West and these will open soon. The members of<br />
your association in the timber trade should now think more of integrated industrial<br />
complexes that will utilise every bit of wood available rather than engage in small<br />
scale sawmilling. Admittedly these sawmills are fulfilling a purpose in supplying sawn<br />
timber for the local market but the time has come when you should compete with<br />
others for the foreign markets.<br />
Vast quantities of processed wood and lumber are consumed locally every year.<br />
It will be incumbent on the members of your Association to find ways and means of<br />
meeting this demand and halt the annual importation of some £7 million worth of<br />
wood and wood products into this country. I am sure that if. you put constructive<br />
proposals to various governments of the Federation pointing out the urgency and<br />
merits attached to each proposal, this Association would be contributing tremendously<br />
to the economy ofNigeria.<br />
We are fortunate in this State to have had the benefit of advice and proposals of the<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Advisory Commission. My Government, as a result of the advice given by<br />
the <strong>Forestry</strong> Advisory Commission is striving to put forestry with the allied industries<br />
in its proper place and accord it top priority in the development programme.<br />
It is saddening to remark that our forests are continually being exhausted of the<br />
traditional mahoganies which had always given an identity of its own to this country<br />
in the timber markets abroad. I appeal to all States Forest Services, the University<br />
and the Research Institute to devise means of replenishing our forests with these valuable<br />
trees. They should not be left out of your gigantic reforestation programmes.<br />
We are approaching a stage, sequence to the depletion of large sized timbers,<br />
whereby we will have to content ourselves with using timbers of smaller dimensions.<br />
Your Association should now be seriously engaged in finding suitable machinery that<br />
will break trees from the thinnings of your plantations to utilisable forms. I have a<br />
feeling that some of these thinnings could find markets as building and construction<br />
materials.<br />
I am told that two States in the north have embarked on large scale game conservation<br />
programmes. This is a noble gesture since the development of game reserves will<br />
no doubt promote tourism and preserve rare animals which are currently on the verge<br />
of extinction. Game anitnals are said to contain better protein than domestic animals<br />
and cattle. I have a similar game conservation programme in this State. Two large<br />
game reserves both over 2,000 sq. miles in extent are being developed to conserve game.<br />
When fully developed the animals will be cropped to provide protein which is generally<br />
deficient in Nigeria's diets.<br />
It is often said that Agriculture is the "backbone" of this country's econOIUY but<br />
only few people ever thought that if agriculture is not sustained to grow, it will never<br />
develop a backbone. <strong>Forestry</strong> has sustained agriculture by helping to stabilise the soil<br />
and prevent erosion. In some parts of the country erosion has threatened lives and<br />
rendered large tracts of land useless. I have no doubt in my mind that the Forest<br />
Services in these areas are doing their best to contain the menace posed by erosion.<br />
Forests not only prevent erosion but they also offer protection to dairy animals.
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 2S<br />
The University and the Research Institute which are, happily, members of this<br />
Association should work together with State Forest Services in solving their management<br />
and staffing problems. Problems will continually rear their heads as you go<br />
deeper into intensive forestry. Problems associated with the marketing ofour unknown<br />
timber species will be worth looking into. The University should provide facilities for<br />
training and servicing forestry personnel through the organising of special courses,<br />
seminars and symposia.<br />
I am happy this Association includes members of the timber trade. The need has<br />
always existed for the "growers" of wood and its "hewers" to work together and<br />
promote forestry in this country. The Forest Services must always have at the back of<br />
their minds the supply of the needs of the trade. They must strive to supply wood in<br />
the form acceptable to the trade. The members of the trade on the other hand must<br />
find suitable forms of use for the wood being grown. They must think of more<br />
sophisticated and modern methods of processing wood in order to minimise wastes.<br />
I have mentioned the establishment of integrated wood industries and the marketing<br />
of our unpopular timber species. I understand that the export of lumber is more<br />
advantageous than log export in that it is more profitable and less capital intensive.<br />
The need for providing employment locally is an added justification for advocating<br />
a policy involving the processing of timber before export.<br />
I have tried to touch on some of the immediate forestry problems that need tackling<br />
in this country. I have by no means exhausted them but I am sure you will be deliberating<br />
on these very fully in your sessions. I have mentioned the uniqueness of your<br />
association in projecting the image of forestry and forest industry in this country to<br />
the outside world. You have the pride of place of being the best organised association<br />
of this nature in the tropics and I hope you will feed factual information on Nigerian<br />
forestry to your counter-parts in other countries. I do hope you will meet regularly<br />
to exchange ideas and views of common interest.<br />
I know you have a heavy programme to go through and I shall leave you to carry<br />
on with your deliberations. Thank you.<br />
SABAH<br />
Logging in Forest Reserves in Sabah<br />
THE GOVERNMENT of the State of Sabah, Malaysia, recently announced that it has<br />
advised the 12 companies logging under 21 year licence agreements in forest reserves<br />
that these agreements will not be renewed when they expire. The licence agreements<br />
of 8 of the companies, which are private, will expire at the end of 1978 while those of<br />
the other 4 which are public including Sabah Timber Co. (formerly British Borneo<br />
Timber Co.) will expire later-the final one at the end of 1984. The total annual coupe<br />
of the 12 companies, which are working on a theoretical sustained yield basis, is 73 sq.<br />
miles with the coupe equal to one hundredth of the total concession area. In addition<br />
a new licence agreement is being concluded with a foundation established by enactment<br />
called The Sabah Foundation, which will have an annual coupe of 30 sq. miles divided<br />
into 10 sub coupes. It is not certain when this will come into force but probably before<br />
the end of 1970.<br />
The reason for the issue of this licence agreement is basically to try and distribute<br />
the profits from the timber industry more evenly among the people. With this end in<br />
view the Sabah Foundation proposes to provide funds and facilities for education,<br />
housing and other projects for the benefit of the peoples of Sabah. At the same time<br />
it hopes to invest in the exploitation and development of other natural resources in<br />
the State in particular oil and minerals.<br />
Forest Inventory: Sabah<br />
A FOREST INVENTORY is at present being carried out in Sabah under a Canadian aid<br />
programme. The inventory is divided into three phases. Phase I is the provision of<br />
3
26 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
suitable aerial photography of the whole State, phase II is the physical inventory of<br />
the forests and phase III is an economic evaluation of the data obtained froIn phase 11.<br />
Forestal <strong>Forestry</strong> and Engineering International Ltd. are responsible for the work<br />
with Hedlin-Menzies and Associates participating in phase Ill. Phase I commenced<br />
towards the end of 1969 and phase II early in 1970 while phase III will start towards<br />
the end of 1970. It is hoped to have all field work completed by the end of 1971 and the<br />
final report presented by mid 1972.<br />
UNITED KINGDOM<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute<br />
Contributed by Dr. H. C. Dawkins, January 1971.<br />
THE C.F.I. is familiar by name to all <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forest authorities but its status<br />
and activities are often not so clear, except to those who frequently work with it. We<br />
hope to include news of these activities regularly in future, in all or most numbers of<br />
this REVIEW.<br />
Pirstly to clarify its status. The C.P.I. is simply the building-much of it furnished<br />
with timber donated by the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-which houses the University Department<br />
of <strong>Forestry</strong>. Among the research and advisory teams within this Department is one<br />
which was set up as a result of the last two <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences,<br />
on finance supplied by 25 <strong>Commonwealth</strong> GovernInents. This teanl works mainly on<br />
problems for which help has been requested by contributing Governments, but is also<br />
working on projects of general interest to all forest authorities such as seed source,<br />
eugenics and yield appraisal of pantropically fast-growing species, data processing and<br />
statistical analysis of inventory and experiment.<br />
Recently for instance R. H. Kemp has collected seed from 28 carefully selected<br />
provenances of central American pines, and while this goes to press he is again in<br />
that area selecting and collecting more. Previous expeditions by Kemp, E. N. G.<br />
Cooling, A. P. A. Lamb and J. Burley have led to a series of international provenance<br />
trials; plans for the latest series have been sent to 39 forest authorities. P. J. Wood<br />
initiated greenhouse trials and electron microscope studies at Oxford to facilitate<br />
early recognition ofhigh quality genotypes. He also visited nine West African countries<br />
to study their species and provenance trials, many of which use seed collected and<br />
plans designed by the Oxford team. Lamb visited India and Ceylon to advise on the<br />
same topic, along with nursery technique and numerous local silvicultural difficulties.<br />
Burley and I. A. Andrew on the genetics and biometric side worked with J. F.<br />
Hughes (University lecturer in wood anatomy) on anatomical variation of Pinus<br />
caribaea collected from several sources, they also published their previous work on<br />
P. khasya, P. merkusii and P. pa/ufa from southern-central Africa. Burley also visited<br />
six countries from eastern to southern Africa to advise on tree introduction and<br />
breeding strategies, with particular reference to the help that C.F.I. might be able to<br />
give. Andrew is developing new techniques of multivariate analysis for the genetical<br />
and wood quality data now coming in from several countries; for example, international<br />
provenance trials of Cedrela odorata and P. merkusii designed by the C.F.I.<br />
team and established in 20 countries are now under analysis.<br />
P. G. Adlard of the Statistical and Computing Section completed his analysis of<br />
the Southeast Johor inventory, and developed from it an ALGOL procedure for<br />
dealing with any future polyspecific inventory. He also completed increment analyses<br />
for 134 Uganda "THP-" sample-plots and for 60 similar but more complex plots in<br />
Sabah. Another new development was a computer simulation of a four-hectare stand<br />
of Malawi pines, for the study of sampling efficiency and its dependence on pattern<br />
of variation in such stands. With T. J. Wormald the section contructed volume tables<br />
for P. halepensis (Cyprus), P. caribaea and P. oocarpa (British Honduras), Ocotea<br />
usambarensis (EAAFRO), Cupressus, Juniperus, Eucalyptus and P. radiata (Kenya).<br />
An ALGOL program was written by B. W. Dawkins to depict all future volulne
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 27<br />
equations as graph-plus-scatter diagrams, to supplement the traditional tables. The<br />
same worker also re-designed the polyspecific sample-plot program in FORTRAN,<br />
so as to make this facility more widely available. It was put to immediate use for<br />
Sarawak swamp forests where some 20 plots await analysis. On average, the section<br />
processes about 20 "runs" on the computer per day, the average job (e.g. volume tables<br />
for a single species) taking perhaps five "runs" to complete.<br />
B. T. Styles as Forest Botanist has continued to advise the Institute's Fast Growing<br />
Tropical Timber Section on the more fundamental botanical aspects of its work, that<br />
is mainly the distribution, systematics and nomenclature of tropical pines and broadleaved<br />
trees. As a contribution towards helping in tree-breeding he is co-operating<br />
\vith the Silviculturist in charge of Tree Improvement in Nigeria (formerly in Ghana)<br />
to study phenology and the biology of flowers and fruits of Triplochiton, Terminalia<br />
and Cedrela and other species of Meliaceae. Styles has continued his study of<br />
chromosome cytology in important timber species of Meliaceae and his many new<br />
observations have been incorporated in a review of existing knowledge. At the request<br />
of the V.S. Forest Service he has begun to investigate the morphological and cytological<br />
variations of the three species of Swietenia and the putative hybrid between<br />
s. macrophylla and S. mahagoni. This hybrid is being more and more frequently<br />
lnentioned in the literature, but adequate botanical evidence is still lacking.<br />
3*
RESEARCH NOTES<br />
CANADA<br />
Rooting Plain and Heel Cutting of Spruce, Ronald M. Girouard, Forest Research<br />
Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and <strong>Forestry</strong>. Quebec.<br />
IN FOREST genetics studies, clonal testing is an important method for the evaluation<br />
of hybrid trees and parental stock. Because a clone consists of all individuals which<br />
have arisen by asexual reproduction from a common ancestor without significant<br />
visible somatic mutation, clonal testing must begin with vegetative propagation.<br />
This method permits the multiplication and preservation of valuable germp!asm.<br />
The propagules in clonal banks can be checked to determine whether or not<br />
certain characteristics are due to environmental factors or to genotype. It is also<br />
possible to establish seed orchards for the production of forest tree seed of tested<br />
stock.<br />
Two forms of vegetative propagation are commonly used in forestry improvement<br />
work: grafting and rooting of cuttings. Grafting may yield rapid results, but<br />
can also be disappointing when incomp,atibility symptoms, not immediately<br />
apparent, sho:w up in trees several years old. Altho'ugh rooting of cuttings eliminates<br />
the e'ffects of incompatibility, other problems exist such as differences in the rooting<br />
ability of cuttings taken from different species or from different trees of the<br />
same species. Most conifers and many of the hardwoods are considered difficult<br />
to root especially from shoots of relatively old or mature trees.<br />
In 1967, my work in Eastern Canada began with a study of adventitious root<br />
formation in stem cuttings of four species of spruce, a difficult-to-root genus as<br />
far as cuttage is concerned. Efforts were made to root, in a greenhouse under intermittent<br />
mist, cuttings with and without a heel of old wood and frequently from<br />
different positions on plantation-grown trees or ortets; the results of this preliminary<br />
work are reported herein.<br />
<strong>Review</strong> of literature<br />
Grade (5) studied the relationship between the position of shoots and the rooting<br />
of cuttings in material collected from an 18-year-old Picea abies tree. Forty-eight<br />
per cent of the cuttings from the up'per third portion of the crown rooted, while<br />
86 per cent of those from the lower third rooted. Root length was greatest and<br />
survival highest in cu:ttings taken from the lower-most part of Norway spruce<br />
trees (6), although the num'ber of roots formed was the same for both categories.<br />
Deuber 1 worked with 26- and 40-year-old trees of P. abies and noted that lateral<br />
branches rooted well.<br />
For winter cuttings of Norway spruce, Deuber and Farrar (2) and Farrar (3) 1939<br />
found that shoot tips with a basal cut were superior to those with a heel of old<br />
wood. Resin was thought to protect the wounded surfaces from bacteria and fungi.<br />
Two years later Farrar and Grace (4) added that plain cuttings of the same plant<br />
species root better than heel cuttings on the basis of p'ercentage rooted and number<br />
and length of roots. For summer collections, heels on the cuttings favoured survival<br />
and rooting in sand, and root length in sand plus peat. In several experiments<br />
involving early spring collections with sand as the rooting medium, the presence<br />
or absence of heels had little effect on rooting. Other plant propagators preferred<br />
cuttings with a cut above the base of the youngest shoots (10, 13), but many continue<br />
to insist on the necessity of using cuttings with a heel of wood or full-length<br />
cuttings with remnant bud scales attached at the base (7,8,9,11,12).<br />
Materials and methods<br />
In June, 1967, branches 'were collected from black spruce [Picea m.ariana (Mill.)<br />
B.S.P.], Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.], red spruce [Picea rubens Sarg.],<br />
and white spruce [Pieca glauca (Moench) Voss.] trees growing in plantations at<br />
28
RESEARCH NOTES<br />
5. GRACE, N. H. 1939. Vegetative propagation of conifers. I. Rooting of cuttings taken<br />
from the upper and lower regions of a Norway spruce tree. Can. J. Res. 17 (Sect. C):<br />
178-180.<br />
6. GRACE, N. H. and M. W. THISTLE. 1940. Vegetative propagation of conifers. V. The<br />
effect of indolylacetic acid and nutrient solutions on the rooting of Norway spruce<br />
cuttings. Can. J. Res. 18 (Sect. C): 122-128.<br />
7. KRUSSMANN, G. 1966. La pepiniere. Vol. I. La multiplication des arbres, arbustes et<br />
conifers. La Maison Rustique, Paris. p. 327.<br />
8. LARSEN, C. M. 1946. Experiments with softwood cuttings of forest trees. Forstl.<br />
F orsogsv. Danmark. 17: 289-443.<br />
9. LARSEN, C. M. 1955. The seasonal variation in the natural rooting capacity of<br />
cuttings of Norway spruce and Sitka spruce. Z. Forstg. Forstpflanzenzuchtung 4:<br />
69-80.<br />
ID. OLIVER, R. W. and S. H. NELSON. 1958. Propagation of spruce from cuttings. Proc.<br />
Plant Prop. Soc. 7: 41-43.<br />
11. PEDERSEN, J. 1965. Propagation from cuttings of Picea pungens "Glauca Globosa."<br />
Proc. lilt. Plant Prop. Soc. 15: 207.<br />
12. SAVELLA, L. 1965. Propagation of Picea pungens glauca cultivars. Proc. Int. Plant<br />
Prop. Soc. 15: 199-202.<br />
13. \VELLS, J. S. 1953. Pointers on propagation; propagating Koster Spruce. Amer Nurs.<br />
98 (9): 13, 48-53.<br />
NIGERIA<br />
Fertiliser Response of Eucalyptus grandis A. L. Mc.Comb, G.C.A. Ojo and J. K.<br />
Jackson.<br />
IN 1966 an inspection of two-year-old plantations of Eucalyptus grandis on the<br />
MambiIla Plateau, North East State showed that most of the trees at both<br />
Maisamari and Nguroje were slow growing and had reddish-purple leaves. Trees<br />
with normal green leaves were two to three times taller. Young maize plants in<br />
adjacent fields showed classical symp'to·ms of p,hosphorous deficiency. Quick tests<br />
made on the soil with Hellige-Truog equipment gave pH values ranging from 5.2<br />
to 5.8 and showed phosphorus, calcium and magnesium to· be very low.<br />
The following experiment was conducted to ascertain if E. grandis seedlings on<br />
one of the soils were suffering from phosphorus deficiency, to determine if other<br />
nutrients might be limiting growth and to see if calcium and magnesium would<br />
improve growth, possibly by increasing availability of phosphorus.<br />
Methods<br />
Two bags of soil were o,btained from the Maisamari plantation through the local<br />
forestry officer. One represented the top soil from 0-6 in. (0-0.15 m.), the second,<br />
subsoil from 12-18 in. (0.30 to 0.46 m). Thirteen nutrient treatments with a control<br />
were applied to each soil in standard (3 x 9 in.) black polythene p,ots. There was<br />
sufficient soil for only seven replicates of the surface so,il and five of the subsoil.<br />
Seeds of E. grandis were sown in each pot and the seedlings later thinned to one<br />
per pot. except for some subsoil pots 'where seedlings grew very poorly. During<br />
germination the pots were watered several times a day by means of a spray to keep<br />
the top 2 in. of soil constantly moist. Sample pots were weighed periodically to<br />
determine the amount of water to be added. The quantity added twice daily was<br />
approximately equal to evapotranspiration losses and it brought the soil to near the<br />
field capacity.<br />
Soil analyses<br />
Standard laboratory chemical and particle size analyses were made on samples<br />
from each lot of soil. pH was determined with a glass electrode in a 1-2.5 soil<br />
\vater mixture, organic matter by oxidation with chromic acid and phosphorus<br />
31
RESEARCH NOTES 33<br />
Results<br />
After four months growth heights were measured, plants harvested and fresh<br />
weights determined. Separate analyses of variance were made of fresh weights on<br />
both surface and subsoil. Figure 1 shows mean fresh weights and the analyses of<br />
variance are in Table 4. Treatments o'n b,oth fresh weights and heights.<br />
On untreate'd subsoil E. grandis grew only 34 mm. in height in four months, but<br />
when P was added alone or with Nand K, seedlings were' 3-6 times taller and 12 to<br />
24 times heavier. With NPK,'CaMg and B along or with four other micronutrients,<br />
heights were 8 to 10 times greater than the control and fresh 'weights 60-70 times<br />
greater.<br />
In contrast to the results with surface soil CaMg alone increased growth very<br />
little, but when added with NPK a large increase occurred. Since the soil was<br />
strongly acid and the amount of calcium carbonate added was small, available P<br />
may have remained at a critical level until added in NPK. It is also possible, in<br />
view of the interaction between 'CaMg and NPK and the Iow levels of Ca and Mg<br />
in the subsoil that either or both Ca and Mg may have been directly limiting.<br />
TABLE 4<br />
ANALYSES OF VARIANCE OF FRESH WEIGHTS OF Eucalyptus grandis GROWN IN A SOIL FROM<br />
THE MAMBILLA PLATEAU<br />
Source d.f. SUlTI of Sqllares Mean Square F<br />
Surface Soil<br />
-----<br />
Total 97 4784<br />
Treatments 13 1613 124.1 3.57*<br />
Replicates 6 425 70.8 2.04 n.s.<br />
Error 78 2710 34.7<br />
Subsoil<br />
Total 69 ]234<br />
Treatments 13 846 65.0 10.08*<br />
Replicates 4 53 13.2 2.05 n.s.<br />
Error 52 335 6.4<br />
The effect of micronutrients in the presence of NPK on plants grown in subsoil<br />
was also large. C'omparing this treatment with NPK, CaMg, Micro and, B, NPK,<br />
CaMg, and in view of the fact that B was included in the micronutrient treatment,<br />
the results suggest response to B and a possible effect of CaMg increasing B or<br />
rnicronutrient availability as well as availability of P.<br />
These results suggest it would be virtually impossible to grow E. grandis from<br />
';;eed on pure subsoil exposed by erosion without fertiliser treatment. Multiple<br />
nutrient deficiences with P being most significant are indicated.<br />
Growth on surface soil was much greater than on subsoil. Duncan's range test<br />
showed that the fresh weights of all treatments except N. NK, and B were<br />
significantly greater than the control. Seedlings receiving P alone or in combination<br />
with Nand K were about twice as tall as the controls and three times heavier. K<br />
gave a statistically significant resp'onse, but the increase due to N or NK was not<br />
significant. The addition of CaMg and micronutrients to NPK gave no increase in<br />
height over NPK alone and fresh weight increases were' sma.ll and not statistically<br />
significan1.
34 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
TABLE 5<br />
TOTAL HEIGHTS (M) AND FRESH WEIGHTS (G) OF Eucalyptus grandis SEEDLINGS GROWN IN<br />
POTS ON A MAMBILLA PLATEAU SURFACE AND SUBSOIL<br />
Treatment<br />
I<br />
Surface Soil I Subsoil<br />
0-6 inches (0-0.15 m.) 12-18 inches (0.30-0.46 m.)<br />
I<br />
Fresh Weight Total Height I Fresh Weight Total Height<br />
(g) I (m) (g) (m)<br />
I<br />
Control<br />
4.5 0.175 0.15 0.034<br />
N I 8.8 0.247 0.45 0.065<br />
P 14.9 0.283 3.67 0.148<br />
K 11.6 0.270 0.19 0.034<br />
NP 13.0 0.305 1.81 0.187<br />
NK 8.1 0.240 0.06 0.029<br />
PK 15.1 0.314 3.15 0.151<br />
NPK 13.7 0.300 2.01 0.092<br />
CaMg 14.3 0.326 0.44 0.047<br />
I<br />
NPK, Ca Mg 17.2<br />
0.379 7.05 0.216<br />
NPK, Ca Mg, Micro* 15.1 0.325 10.65 0.290<br />
NPK, Micro 16.7 0.336<br />
6.49 0.225<br />
B, NPK, CaMg 19.5 0.387 8.99 0.337<br />
Boron 7.8 0.218 0.47 0.047<br />
*Micronutrients are tnanganese, zinc, copper, molybdenum and boron<br />
Plants receiving only CaMg were about the same size as those receiving P alone<br />
or in combination with Nand K, and were significantly larger than the controls.<br />
No tissue tests were made so it was not possible to tell, as planned, if :CaMg increased<br />
the availability of soil P to the seedlings. 'Seedlings receiving B alone were<br />
about 75 per cent heavier than the controls but the difference was not quite significant<br />
at the 5 per cent probability level. T'here is no evidence that the see'dlings<br />
responded to the other micronutrients-manganese, zinc, copp1er and molybdenum.<br />
The evidence as a whole points to P as the principal limiting element with the<br />
suggestion that B may also be re'quired and that liming may help, increase P<br />
availability in the less acid surface soil. Because of the rather large variations in<br />
treatment response between replicates a more detailed discussion of the interactions<br />
of various treatments does not seem warranted. The' need for field fertiliser trials<br />
employing at least P. B, Ca and N alone and in combinations, is indicated.<br />
I
ALL LIFE ON EARTH<br />
World Wildlife Fund 2nd International Congress<br />
VIEWED OBJECTIVELY this Congress was a tremendous success. How could it be otherwise<br />
when gathered on one platform were two royal sponsors, Their Royal Highnesses,<br />
The Prince of the Netherlands and the Duke of Edinburgh together with a galaxy<br />
of leaders in the field of human accomplishments; Mr. Neil Armstrong, first man on<br />
the Moon; Sir Bernard Lovell, Director of Jodrell Bank; Dr. Thor Heyerdahl of<br />
Kontiki fame; Dr. Jacques Piccard, designer of the mesocaphe for underwater<br />
research; to mention but a few well-known household names and not forgetting<br />
Mr. Peter Scott, founder of the movement.<br />
Viewed subjectively what was this Congress all about? The theme of the Congress<br />
was "All Life on Earth" or to use the latest catchword the "biosphere". It is true that<br />
protection of various forms of animal and plant life were considered by the various<br />
speakers but more in passing than as a theme. The main theme was quite openly the<br />
preservation of the environment in order to ensure man's own survival on this earth.<br />
A visitor from outer space might well have considered this Congress a meeting of<br />
Doomwatch Incorporated, or a gathering of harbingers of doom. The press certainly<br />
seized on this aspect, witness headlines from one evening paper 'Man is doomedwarning<br />
over population boom'.<br />
In his opening address, Prince Philip, President of the British National Appeal<br />
hit the nail on the head with his comment "If the support of distinguished people<br />
could solve the problem of the world's wildlife the campaign would be over bar the<br />
cheering". He went on to criticise the meagre support given so far by Governments<br />
and the United Nations. He made further points alnounting to "We want our cake<br />
and to eat it as well; we think wildlife is a good thing but we want the land it occupies;<br />
we like animals but we want the furs they wear." We thought His Royal Highness's<br />
strictures on management of existing reserves and parks somewhat unfair. Surely it is<br />
a case of too few trying to do too much with too little support.<br />
Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands followed Prince Philip. He came straight to the<br />
point, the root cause of the trouble is the present population explosion and the<br />
accompanying demand for more of the good things of life. He went on to say that the<br />
cause was as good as lost unless we could limit our population and provide enough<br />
room for both men and animals to live in har'mony.<br />
Mr. Peter Scott in his address moved immediately onto what was to becon1e the<br />
theme of the Congress; the danger to the environment and what could be done about<br />
it. Quoting from population statistics, consumption trends, literacy trends, and<br />
referring to such recent books as Rachel Carson's Silent Spring he painted a most<br />
ominous picture of the future of mankind. A future which would be inevitable unless<br />
the Message got through. A Message to the Decision Makers, alias our legislators.<br />
He expressed himself as in favour of space exploration but not S.S.T. (super sonic<br />
transport), a sOlnewhat contradictory attitude we thought.<br />
There followed a galaxy of distinguished speakers, leaders in their own sphere.<br />
American lunarnaut, Mr. Neil Armstrong revealed himself as a very able speaker<br />
as well as a space explorer. His talk was preceded by a most impressive colour film of<br />
the Apollo 11 Moon Landing. Mr. Armstrong restricted his talk on the moon trip<br />
to a description of 'The Blue Planet' as seen from the Moon. He then switched to the<br />
problems of conservation on earth. He spoke on the need for better land use in order<br />
to produce the extra food for the extra two billion population expected by the end<br />
of the century. Fortunately Mr. ArlTIstrong was not exposed to questions, as at least<br />
three participants were lined up to ask him whether the cost of putting him on the<br />
Moon would not have been better spent on irrigating the Sahara or even financing the<br />
World Wildlife Fund.<br />
Dr. G. H. Beeby, President of the Society of Chemical Industry spoke on the threat<br />
to the environment from pollution, firstly from chemical processing and secondly<br />
36
ALL LIFE ON EARTH 37<br />
from the problem of indestructible waste. As a particular instance he quoted the<br />
phenomenal persistence, chemically unchanged, of D.D.T. which had been found in<br />
penguins many thousands of miles from any point of use. Dr. Beeby and subsequent<br />
speakers emphasised the continued and increasing pollution of the atmosphere, the<br />
rivers and the oceans caused by pesticides, industrial processes and the waste products<br />
thereof.<br />
The Rt. Hon. Peter Walker, Secretary of State for the Environment gave a very<br />
good address. He showed a wide knowledge of the problems confronting him. Not<br />
everyone is completely happy, however, to find the future of a motor way and the<br />
conflicting interest of a National Park in the hands of the same authority.<br />
From the floor of the Congress one gained the impression that many of the 600<br />
participants were emotionally or sentimentally involved with the protection of particular<br />
animals or birds and were not quite in the picture with the Congress trend of<br />
protection of the environment including the oceans and the atmosphere.<br />
As a forester I was singularly disappointed not to find a distinguished forester<br />
among the speakers. As far as I could ascertain there were only two other foresters<br />
among the participants, Mr. Aleem, Inspector General of Forests, Pakistan and<br />
Mr. R. S1. Barbe Baker, founder of Men of the Trees. Surely the organisers of the<br />
World Wildlife Fund must be fully aware that of all the land areas of the globe those<br />
having the most effect on the environment or the biosphere are the World's forest<br />
areas. Canadian forest researchers have recently come up with the information that a<br />
healthy forest absorbs 12 tons of carbon dioxide and produces four tons of oxygen per<br />
acre per year. Canada alone has 600 million acres of forest, an acre produces sufficient<br />
oxygen for 20 people per year, a little simple arithmetic provides the answer that oxygen<br />
from Canada's forests alone would supply double the anticipated World population<br />
at the end of the century. Coming nearer home there are in Britain some 3,000,000<br />
acres of forests mostly in the care of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission. Is one to conclude that<br />
the World Wildlife Fund is afraid the spectre of 'serried ranks of Conifers' might spoil<br />
its image? A forester among the speakers might well have brought a ray of hope to<br />
brighten the otherwise gloomy list of prognoses. Of all people foresters are best<br />
equipped favourably to influence the environment.<br />
In this same forestry context one cannot help wondering whether the sponsors of<br />
the World Wildlife Fund, not to mention the majority of the participants, are aware<br />
that had it not been for the activities of earlier generations of foresters particularly in<br />
the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> there would today have been very little wildlife to conserve or<br />
habitat in which to conserve it. Foresters established their forest reserves, the first<br />
game reserves and wrote the wildlife laws, many of which are still valid.<br />
One strange omission from the gloomy forecasts was any reference to the possibility<br />
of a nuclear holocaust. Science fiction writers have been so often right in the past.<br />
They could be right again.<br />
The Congress concluded with the adoption of a series of resolutions addressed to<br />
all World Governments including a personal message from the President of the World<br />
Wildlife Fund (International) H.R.H. Prince of the Netherlands inviting all Governlnents<br />
to initiate some form of population control. Obviously Utopia cannot be<br />
attained as a result of one Congress; many themes will require hammering home by<br />
subsequent Congresses before a millenium is reached.<br />
As an example the resolution which evoked the most emotional response from the<br />
floor was that ably proposed by H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands appealing<br />
to all women to renounce the wearing or use of garments or products from certain<br />
endangered animals, in particular the larger felines; yet the following week-end a<br />
well-known variety star arrived at Heathrow wearing a leopard skin coat and a Sunday<br />
newspaper sponsored a competition involving a variety of fur coats including some<br />
from skins of the named animals.<br />
E.W.M.
40 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
The vegetation consists almost entirely of rainforest (simple mesophyll vine forest<br />
according to Webb's classification of 1959). Several of the ridges support a growth of<br />
eucalypts (chiefly Eucalyptus grandis) with a rainforest understory.<br />
Rainfall is variable and during the past eight years has ranged from 64 to 140 inches<br />
with an average of 108 inches (Fig. 2). Rainfall is markedly seasonal and most falls<br />
occur during the wet season months from January to April. During this period very<br />
little logging activity takes place.<br />
A dam is to be built at Copperlode Falls to provide better storage and regulation<br />
for the Cairns City and Mulgrave Shire domestic water supply. The area to be<br />
inundated is logged to a minimum girth of 48 inches girth breast height (g.b.h.) while<br />
the remaining area is logged to girth limits imposed by the tree marking rules of the<br />
Queensland <strong>Forestry</strong> Department. Treemarked logging generally removes 3,000 to<br />
5,000 super feet per acre, while logging down to 48 inches g.b.h. generally removes<br />
8,000 to 10,000 super feet per acre. This means that the area to be inundated is subjected<br />
to a heavy Jogging with the removal of a large number of small trees, resulting in<br />
severe disturbance by crawler tractors and the exposure of a large area of bare soil.<br />
Methods<br />
Commencing late in 1965, samples of stream water were collected automatically<br />
at various points in the catchment (see Fig. 1) using vertically integrated single stage<br />
samplers-type U.S. U-59B (Inter-agency Committee on Water Resources, 1961).<br />
These samplers are designed to operate on the rising stage of the streams and they<br />
were arranged on a staff to take a sample with each four inch rise of the stream. The<br />
samplers were located above and below areas of major logging activity on each of the<br />
two main streams. In addition to the permanent samplers, hand samples were taken<br />
during rain periods as opportunities presented themselves.<br />
The sediment concentration of the samples was determined using millipore filtration<br />
equipment (Winneberger, Austin and Klett, 1963) and expressed in parts per million<br />
(p.p.m.).<br />
Samples were collected during the wet season each year from 1965-66 until 1968-69.<br />
Access into the catchment was often cut for up to six weeks after very heavy rain periods<br />
due to slides across the roads. This prevented complete sampling from being carried<br />
out. Rainfall was recorded in storage gauges at several points in the catchment (Fig. 1)<br />
and a recording rain gauge located'adjacent to sediment sampling point S4 provided<br />
rainfall intensity information.<br />
Results<br />
Sediment Effects<br />
Noticeable concentrations of suspended sediment occurred in the streams only<br />
following periods of rain. At other times the sediment level normally remained below<br />
4p.p.m.<br />
Exceptions occurred when vehicles moved through open stream crossings. When<br />
this occurred, sediment levels rose to several hundred p.p.m. immediately downstream<br />
of the disturbance, but dropped to upstream levels within a short distance. However,<br />
in this way a considerable amount of fine sediment was stored in the stream bed ready<br />
to move into suspension as soon as a stream rise occurred. For this reason, open ford<br />
crossings are undesirable features in a catchment where sediment levels are considered<br />
important.<br />
The first year of sampling (1965-66) was one of low total rainfall and was marked<br />
by an almost complete lack of high intensity falls. Because of this only a relatively<br />
small number of samples was obtained from the permanent sampling stations. There<br />
were only two periods of high intensity rain during the year and the sediment levels<br />
resulting from the first of these are shown in Fig. 3. The increase in sediment levels<br />
between the stations above and below logging activity is marked. The sediment derived<br />
from the streams flowing through undisturbed areas was largely organic in nature and
42 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
contrasted with the mineral sediment from the streams after they had flowed through<br />
the logged and roaded area.<br />
The sediment graphs from the sampling stations located below logging activity<br />
shown in Fig. 3 show a peak early in the rise of the stream. This pattern was also<br />
characteristic of almost all the sampling in subsequent years and was probably due to<br />
the sediment source areas being fairly close to the sampling stations. The initial<br />
flush of surface runoff from bare areas in the lower portions of the catchment caused<br />
high sediment concentrations in the early stages of the stream rise. These high<br />
concentrations were diluted as the increased flows from the undisturbed upper catchment<br />
areas made their impact on the total flow. Sediment concentrations then increased<br />
again due' to stream bank and bed erosion from the high flows'.<br />
Samples were taken from one of the reservoirs in the city of Cairns nine hours after<br />
the main storm period which produced the sediment pattern shown in Fig. 3. These<br />
samples revealed a concentration of 430 p.p.m. The reservoir became fully charged<br />
with turbid water and took about a week to clear.<br />
Data from the permanent sampling stations provided information on the total<br />
sediment levels from the disturbed area of the catchment. However, 'it was necessary<br />
to pinpoint the sediment source areas and evaluate the contributions of the various<br />
sources. To achieve this, samples were collected from sections of the stream which<br />
were crossed by roads or were influenced by snig tracks, log ramps, etc. In some cases<br />
sediment source areas were located by following turbid water upstream during rain<br />
periods, until the source of the sediment was found.<br />
It became apparent that most of the sediment was derived from poorly located<br />
undrained roads and snig tracks and from earth and log fill crossings such as that<br />
shown in Fig. 4. One striking point which emerged was the fact that a major portion<br />
of the sediment was derived from a few small sediment source areas. An example of<br />
the effect of one of these areas is shown in Table 1. Even though no noticeable rise<br />
occurred in stream height, considerable sedimentation resulted.<br />
TABLE I<br />
Sediment concentration from a log ramp adjacent to the stream after rain influence of 26<br />
points in 20 minutes between 1320 and 1340 hours on 25.1.66.<br />
Upstream of ramp<br />
Location Time (hours) Sediment concentration (p.p.m.)<br />
Immediately downstream of ramp<br />
50 metres downstream of ramp<br />
400 metres downstream of ramp<br />
400 metres downstream of ramp<br />
13.45<br />
13.45<br />
13.50<br />
14.00<br />
15.45<br />
48<br />
2,602<br />
Table 1 shows also how the sediment clears rapidly once rain ceases. However,<br />
during the wet season light showers such as the one which caused the sediment levels<br />
shown in Table 1 frequently occur for days or even weeks at a time. Consequently<br />
this can result in an almost continuous source of sediment-laden water leaving the<br />
catchment.<br />
In general, sedimentation occurred following almost every rain influence and it<br />
became severe and affected the city water supply after rains ofmoderately low intensity.<br />
The area covered by snig tracks during normal rainforest logging is considerable<br />
as can be seen from Table 2. '<br />
203<br />
186<br />
21
EFFECTS OF LOGGING ON STREAMFLOW IN NORTH QUEENSLAND 43<br />
TABLE 2<br />
Area covered by snig tracks dUling rainforest logging from which approximately 10,000<br />
super feet per acre log timber was removed (unpublished data * from B. P. M. Hyland).<br />
Main Snig Tracks<br />
First order Snig Tracks<br />
Second order Snig Tracks<br />
TOTAL<br />
*Data obtained by point sampling on a one chain grid over an area 0/65 acres.<br />
per cent of Area covered<br />
by Snig Tracks<br />
The situation in Freshwater Creek would be very similar to that shown in Table 2"<br />
as the volume of timber removed per acre was approximately the same. The main<br />
snig tracks normally have all of the topsoil removed and produce excellent artificial<br />
water channels. When downhill snigging is carried out (as it is in the lower portion of<br />
Freshwater Creek) this produces a network of deeply worn snig tracks converging onto<br />
a log ramp adjacent to the creek. In the absence of drainage from the snig tracks the<br />
effect on the water quality is obvious.<br />
The snig tracks remain erosion hazards for many years because the topsoil has been<br />
removed and vegetation does not establish readily on the less fertile subsoil.<br />
As a result of the above findings the logging agreements which cover the timber<br />
sales in the Freshwater Creek basin were modified in an attempt to reduce the amount<br />
and duration of sediment in the streams.<br />
These modifications include the following points:<br />
(a) Snigging and hauling through running streams is prohibited.<br />
(b) The location of roads, log ramps and major snig tracks is subject to approval by<br />
the field officer in charge. Log ramps to be kept as far away from streams as<br />
practicable and in any case at least two chain from any stream bank.<br />
(c) The purchaser must construct and maintain drains from roads, snig tracks and log<br />
ramps.<br />
(d) Earth and log fill crossings (as shown in Fig. 4) are prohibited and where practicable,<br />
girder bridges are constructed.<br />
(e) A logging arch is used where this is considered necessary by the field officer in<br />
charge.<br />
(f) Operations may be suspended by the field officer if he considers these operations<br />
are detrimental to water or forest interests.<br />
During 1967 these conditions were inserted in all new timber sales in the area and<br />
in all other sales as they became due for re-assessment. In the old sale areas departmental<br />
plant was used to construct drains and water bars on all sediment-yielding roads<br />
and snig tracks.<br />
Sediment sampling continued during the wet season from 1966-67 to 1968-69.<br />
Rainfall was higher during these years than during the first year of sampling, and this<br />
caused frequent and often extended interruptions to the sampling programme. Heavy<br />
rains from cyclonic influences off the cost caused considerable damage to roads and<br />
bridges and hampered access. Most of the earth and log fill crossings washed away<br />
at such times and this contributed to extremely high sediment levels in the streams<br />
and reservoirs. The sediment sampling stations were always damaged and frequently<br />
washed away entirely on these occasions. However, from the numerous samples that<br />
were collected it was evident that the pattern of sediment levels which was apparent<br />
during 1965-66 was maintained until 1967-68. However, by the 1968-69 wet season<br />
there was a marked reduction in sediment levels (Fig. 5). The highest sediment level<br />
obtained from the reservoirs in Cairns during 1968-69 was 39 p.p.m. and this was<br />
immediately following 25 inches of rain in three days from cyclone "Bridget". The<br />
4*<br />
6.0<br />
9.0<br />
6.1<br />
21.1
44 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
highest level measured from the permanent sampling stations within the catchment<br />
during 1968-69 was 188 p.p.m. after 1,050 points of rain (Fig. 6). This contrasts with<br />
Fig. 3 which shows the results of a storm of only 263 points in 1966.<br />
Logging continued at approximately the same intensity during the four years of<br />
measurement, and although work commenced on some new sale areas in the upper<br />
reaches of the catchment (some distance from the lower sediment sampling points)<br />
logging still continued on most of the sale areas in the lower portion of the catchment.<br />
Figure 4. Earth and log fill crossings such as the one depicted here were a common feature<br />
of roading practice in Freshwater Creek prior to 1967. Normal wet season rain washes these<br />
crossings away and causes considerable sedimentation of the water supply.<br />
Streamflow Effects<br />
A number of local authority officers have expressed concern at the possible<br />
deleterious effects on streamflow quantity caused by heavy logging. This concern is<br />
based on the assumption that greatly increased evaporation will occur from bare soil<br />
exposed by logging, thus decreasing the water available for streamflow. Such effects<br />
are difficult to assess, as streamflow records from Freshwater Creek (at Copperlode<br />
Falls), are only available from mid 1960. In addition, there are few records available<br />
from streams in the same area with which a comparison could be made. However, a<br />
double n1ass curve analysis was carried out to compare the yields of Freshwater Creek<br />
\vith those ofBabinda Creek (25 miles south of Freshwater Creek) which flows through<br />
a virgin rainforest catchment (Fig. 7). This shows that there is no major inconsistency<br />
in the relationship between the annual flow from the two streams. However, there is a<br />
slight tendency towards an increase in the flow of Freshwater Creek compared with<br />
that from Babinda Creek as is indicated by the general increase in the relative slope of<br />
the various segments of the curve with time. This could be a random movement, and<br />
to test this a double mass curve analysis was carried out to compare the rainfall at<br />
Copperlode Falls with that at Babinda (Fig. 8). Rainfall and runoff are normally<br />
closely correlated, so it could be expected that any fluctuations shown in the rainfall<br />
curve would be reflected in the runoff curve. The relative slope of the various segments
EFFECTS OF LOGGING ON STREAMFLOW IN NORTH QUEENSLAND 47<br />
of the curve in Fig. 8 show very little change and the entire curve approximates a<br />
straight line. This strengthens the suggestion that there has been a slight increase<br />
in runoff from Freshwater Creek.<br />
This is the expected trend, as removal of the deep rooted trees lessens the transpiration<br />
demand on the soil water store and more of the subsequent rainfall is available<br />
for streamflow. Increased evaporation will occur from the bare soil areas, but<br />
experience elsewhere indicates that this is more than offset by the savings made from<br />
reduced transpiration (Lull and Fletcher 1962, Ziemer 1964, Orr 1968).<br />
Discussion<br />
The primary objective of this investigation was to determine improvements in the<br />
current logging practices so that sediment levels in Freshwater Creek are kept to a<br />
t1lininlUJTI. It has been shown that sediment levels can be reduced substantially by the<br />
application ofa few simple precautions. A large portion of the sediment is derived from<br />
a relatively few sediment source areas, and it is the attention to small details to prevent<br />
the occurrence of these source areas which has brought about a marked improvement<br />
to the overall sediment production picture. The importance of these relatively small<br />
areas in producing more than their share, on an area basis, of runoff and sediment has<br />
been noted in other studies (Marston 1952, Betson 1964, Gilmour 1968).<br />
With the type of logging being carried out in Freshwater Creek it is inevitable that<br />
sonle sedimentation will occur during periods of intense and prolonged rain. The main<br />
road access to the basin is from the north, and because of the rugged topography the<br />
111ain logging roads tend to follow the streams, particularly in the lower portion of the<br />
catchnlent. This in itself is bad roading practice as it is impossible to prevent some soil<br />
fronl the roads being washed into the stream. However, it is the only feasible location<br />
for the roads under the prevailing conditions, so added care and attention is necessary<br />
for road drainage.<br />
The logging occurring in the lower portions of the Freshwater Creek basin is heavier<br />
than nornlally occurs because all commercial trees above 48 inches g.b.h. are being<br />
removed from the area to be inundated by the proposed Copperlode Falls Dam.<br />
Because of this no attempt was made to leave a filter strip of uncut vegetation along<br />
the strealTI banks. The retention of such a strip would probably be of great advantage<br />
in filtering out sediment from runoff originating on disturbed areas. The effectiveness<br />
of this provision is currently under test in a small rainforest catchment on the Atherton<br />
Tableland.<br />
Two resources are being utilised from Freshwater Creek-timber and water-and<br />
both of them are very valuable. A total of 27.6 million super feet of log timber has<br />
been harvested from the basin since logging commenced in 1960 (until mid 1969).<br />
The value of this timber to the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department in terms of royalty was $528,000.<br />
The retail value of the timber is difficult to determine. However, assuming a 40 per<br />
cent recovery and an average retail price of $25 per 100 super feet, the retail price is<br />
$2.76 Inillion. This averages out at about $307,000 per year. This would be somewhat<br />
conservative, as many of the logs are converted to veneer which is a high priced<br />
product. Nonetheless it serves to illustrate the value of the timber derived from this<br />
one small basin in the general economy of the Cairns District.<br />
The monetary value of the other resource utilised from the area-water-is even<br />
more difficult to determine. The receipts to the Cairns City and Mulgrave Shire<br />
Councils for rates and charges from the Freshwater Creek supply during 1965-66<br />
were $91,000, and this may be considered to be the "retail" value of the water.<br />
Water will continue to be harvested long after the present cutting cycle is completed<br />
and the overall monetary value of the water will probably exceed that of the timber.<br />
It may be argued that it is impossible to place a monetary value on the water supply<br />
as it is essential to the well being of the community. In addition, there are numerous<br />
intangible benefits which can be attributed to both the timber and the water.<br />
It is obvious from the above discussion that there are two verY'valuable resources
48 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
being harvested from the one area and, as generally occurs in such cases, conflicts<br />
have arisen between them. If it is desired to receive the maximum benefit to the<br />
community as a whole from the resources available, each resource producer has to<br />
make concessions to the other. As mentioned previously, it is impossible to keep all<br />
sediment from the streams and this is the concession which the water authorities<br />
have to make-perhaps even to the extent of installing a filtration plant. The timber<br />
users have to make concessions by leaving certain areas of timber uncut to protect<br />
stream banks, by spending money on constructing girder bridges and by building<br />
drains and water bars on roads and snig tracks. Commencing in mid 1967 all new timber<br />
sales and an sales which became due for re-assessment had allowances included in the<br />
royalty determinations to enable the purchaser to carry out the drainage and bridging<br />
requirements. This represents a total loss of royalty to the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department of<br />
approximately $16,800 (including the loss calculated on the timber still to be removed<br />
from the catchment).<br />
We are rapidly approaching the stage in Australia where management of forest land<br />
for one resource only is no longer feasible. As population pressures increase and we<br />
have to rely on an unchanging or diminishing resource level, we will be forced into a<br />
system of multiple use management in order to make the most effective use of the<br />
resources available. Under such a system it is seldom possible to achieve optimum<br />
production from anyone resource because of the concessions that have to be made to<br />
accommodate the others. However, properly applied it will yield the greatest total<br />
benefit to the community.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS •<br />
Permission to publish this paper and to' quote from <strong>Forestry</strong> Department records is gratefully<br />
acknowledged. Assistance was provided by Mr. K. D. Sanderson for a large part of the field<br />
and laboratory work, and the streamflow records were provided by the Queensland Irrigation<br />
and Water Supply Commission. Mr. P. Maconachie collected most of the samples froin the<br />
Cairns City Council reservoirs and reticulation system.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
BERNDT, H. W. and SWANK, G. W., 1970. Forest land use and streamflow in Central Oregon.<br />
U.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Pap. PNW-93.<br />
BETsoN, R. P., 1964. What is watershed runoff? J. Gephys. Res. 69: 1541-52.<br />
GILMOUR, D. A., 1968. Hydrological investigations of soil and vegetation types in the lower<br />
Cotter catchment. Aust. For. 32: 243-56.<br />
HAUPT, H. F. and KIDD, W. J., 1965. Good logging practices reduce sedimentation in Central<br />
Idaho. J. For. 63: 664-70.<br />
HmBERT, A. R., 1969. Water yield changes after converting a forested catchment to grass.<br />
Water Resour. Res. 5: 634-40.<br />
Inter-agency Committee on Water Resources, 1961. The Single-Stage sampler for suspended<br />
sediment! Report No. 13 of Subcommittee on sedimentation. D.S. Govt. Printing Office.<br />
LULL, H. W. and FLETcHER, P. W., 1962. Comparative influence of hardwood trees, litter,<br />
and bare area on soil-moisture regimen. Dni. of Missouri, Agr. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 800.<br />
LULL, H. W. and REINHART, K. G., 1967. Increasing water yield in the northeast by Inanagement<br />
of forested watersheds. U.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Pap. NE-66.<br />
MARSTON, R. B., 1952. Ground cover requirements for summer storm run-off control on<br />
aspen sites in Nothern Utah. J. For. 50: 303-7.<br />
ORR, H. K. 1968. Soil moisture trends after thinning and clearcutting in a second-growth<br />
Ponderosa Pine stand in the Black Hills. D.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Note RM-99.<br />
PACKER, P. E. 1966. Forest treatment effects on water quality. "Forest Hydrology" Pergamon<br />
Press, Oxford and New York 1966.<br />
REINHART, K. G., ESCHNER, A. R. and TRIMBLE, G. R., 1963. Effect on streamflow of four<br />
forest practices in the mountains of West Virginia. V.S.D.A. Forest Serve Res. Pap. NE-I.<br />
WEBB, L. J., 1959. A Physiognomic classification of Australian rain forests. J. Ecol. 47: 551<br />
570.<br />
WINNEBERGER, J. H., AUSTIN, J. H. and KLETT, C. A., 1963. Membrane filter weight determinations.<br />
Water Pollution Control Journal 35: 807-13. .<br />
ZIEMER, R. R., 1964. Summer evapotranspiration trends as related to time after logging of<br />
forests in Sierra Nevada. J. Geophys. Res. 69: 615-20.
AUSTROPLATYPUS, A NEW GENUS OF THE<br />
PLATYPODIDAE {COLEOPTERA}, INFESTING LIVING<br />
EUCALYPTUS TREES IN AUSTRALIA<br />
F. G. BROWNE<br />
IN DESCRIBING the Australian Platypus incompertus, Schedl (1968) noted that "the<br />
species is rather difficult to place in one of the known groups or within the genus<br />
Platypus". Having examined numerous specimens of both sexes ofthis species, and also<br />
the larva, sent to me by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of New South Wales, I am of the<br />
opinion that it is impossible to include it in Platypus, and that it represents a hitherto<br />
unknown genus of doubtful affinities, for which the name Austroplatypus is proposed.<br />
The antennal club, which is rather small and not strongly compressed (not large and<br />
strongly compressed as in Platypus), and the outer face of which has a smooth basal<br />
plate, most closely resembles that of Notoplatypus, another Australian genus, but<br />
other characters seem to place it in the Platypodini, rather close to the Malaysian<br />
Dendroplatypus. The larval characters, which will be described elsewhere, also suggest<br />
affinity with Dendroplatypus,. they differ from those of the Platypus larva in the form<br />
of the labrum and of the prodorsal pattern of the thorax.<br />
Generic characters ofthe adult. Body slender. Head a little wider than the pronotum,<br />
the frons abruptly separated from the vertex, flattened, about as wide as long. Eyes<br />
subcircular, set on the sides of the head. Antenna (Fig. lA) inserted on the side of the<br />
head close to the lower border ofthe eye; scape subcylindrical, a little longer than wide;<br />
funicle inserted at the apex of the scape, four-segmented; club ovate, rather small, only<br />
a little longer than the funical, not very strongly compressed, the outer face with a<br />
smooth, corneous basal plate, the remainder porous and pubescent. Maxilla (Fig. 1C)<br />
with galea and lacinia united, the maxillary palpus four-segmented, the segments firm<br />
and cylindrical, not compressed as in Platypus. Labial palpi (Fig. 1B) composed of<br />
three free segments. Pronotum with long, shallow lateral emarginations, only the<br />
posterior extremities of which are abruptly angulate. Scutellum depressed. Elytra of<br />
male and female more or less similar, the apical declivity obliquely convex. Abdomen<br />
longitudinally almost horizontal. Prothoracic coxae approximate. Outer face of the<br />
prothoracic tibia with some transverse carinae in both sexes.<br />
Fig. 1. Austroplatypus incompertus. A, antenna. B, labial pa/pi. C, maxilla.<br />
B<br />
49
TREES-BRITAIN'S NEGLECTED ASSET $3<br />
It was obvious that with personal taxation rates rising all the time, the encouragement,<br />
by way oftax incentives, given to woodland owners to plant trees was ofinterest.<br />
A few individuals decided to purchase some land and plant trees. An organisation<br />
was set up to manage the investment. And in 1957 Fountain <strong>Forestry</strong> Ltd. was formed.<br />
Fountain <strong>Forestry</strong> Ltd. purchased more land as time progressed and developed<br />
its management service on behalf of clients both inside and outside the Group. Soon<br />
it was found that to keep men and machinery occupied it was worth contracting to<br />
work for neighbouring woodland owners. Gradually a comprehensive service was<br />
set up, involving management of the neighbouring owners' woods as well as those of<br />
new investors.<br />
In the '60s Fountain <strong>Forestry</strong> expanded rapidly, entering the '70s as managers of<br />
about 40,000 acres of woodlands in England, Wales and Scotland and marketing<br />
more than one million cubic feet of timber annually.<br />
In addition to the acres managed, the company has a contract turnover of several<br />
hundred thousand pounds on such diverse jobs as purchasing material from the<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission and marketing it; erection of fences for farmers and local<br />
authorities; silvicultural operations for small woodland owners; landscape gardening<br />
and a variety of other rural tasks.<br />
A steady stream of urban investors is bringing capital into the countryside through<br />
the company's schemes, and at the same time long established estates are being<br />
managed. These range in size from Dartington Hall Woodlands in Devon (about<br />
2,000 acres) down to small farms with 20 or 30 acres. To achieve this a large staff<br />
with many different specialist skills is involved.<br />
There are two main incentives to an industrialist or City man to invest in forestry,<br />
apart from the security afforded by ownership of land.<br />
First, he can elect to run his forestry commercially under Schedule D and so, by<br />
offsetting the development costs against gross earnings, create a capital asset from<br />
money which would otherwise be paid in tax. His heir will be assessed under Schedule<br />
B and, while paying a small annual tax, will pay no income tax, surtax or capital<br />
gains tax on timber sold.<br />
Secondly, because a timber crop takes 50 or 60 years to grow, the Inland Revenue<br />
has made special Estate Duty arrangements. These consist mainly of non-aggregation<br />
of the timber when assessing the rate of duty and of deferring payment of duty until<br />
timber is eventually harvested. Payment then is made only on the net proceeds after<br />
expenses based on the value at the date of death. Duty cannot be levied twice on the<br />
same crop.<br />
Direct aid in the form of planting and management grants is also available.<br />
One might expect that the encouragement given to private forestry would cause it<br />
to expand rapidly, and since the Second World War the rate ofexpansion has gradually<br />
accelerated. But the chief drawback of a forestry investment is the thought that one<br />
lTIUSt spend 20 to 25 years in building it up, although the profits will come to one's<br />
heirs. On the other hand, those who have been lucky enough to inherit productive<br />
woods from their far-sighted fathers and grandfathers are in no doubt about the<br />
value of the investment.<br />
All forecasts tell us that timber demand will continue to rise rapidly. Timber is our<br />
third largest import by value. Yet by international standards our planting rate falls<br />
woefully short of our country's timber needs for the future. Not only have we the<br />
smallest proportionate acreage under timber of any European country, but we are<br />
after the V.S.A. almost the largest timber users per capita in the world.<br />
Why is this when there are at least one million acres carrying scrub, most of which<br />
formerly carried timber, and there are more than 15 million acres of hill land<br />
euphemistically called "rough grazing"? In real terms the value of this land for<br />
grazing is no greater than it was in the days of pre-historic pastoral settlement.<br />
Land use in Britain is a subject of intense and growing interest. The rival claims of<br />
industry, transport, agriculture, forestry and recreation all require" to be assessed.
54 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
There is a plethora oflegislation affecting national parks, rural development areas and<br />
numerous Town and Country Planning Acts. Yet one factor stands out: namely that<br />
the city dweller does not realise how much of our rough grazing is fertile land which,<br />
given availability of capital and the existence of modem machinery and techniques,<br />
could be brought into forestry production.<br />
All management· decisions contain an element of selection. Management tries to<br />
select the course which leads to maximum long-term profitability. The clear indications<br />
are that a greatly increased national investment in timber would benefit the economy<br />
in terms of return on capital invested, in terms of imports saved, in terms of rural<br />
employment and, not least, for the people of these islands in terms of public amenity,<br />
recreation and scenic beauty.<br />
We could establish three million acres of forest for the price of the development<br />
costs of Concorde. This would almost double existing timber production. Both are<br />
desirable, but have the merits of both been equally carefully assessed?<br />
After many years of neglect and stagnation, the facts alone should mean that<br />
forestry as an industry will again take its rightful place in our affairs.<br />
Sheep occupy 1-1' million acres of our 15·5 million acres<br />
ofmarginal land. They save £40·25m in imports annually.<br />
Woodlands-many not yet in production-cover<br />
,4·3 million acres. Yet already they-save £55·5m annually.<br />
The illustration shows the difference in output per acre.<br />
Million<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
SHEEP<br />
WOODLANDS<br />
Million<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10
56 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
mlst extract ':and distribute it over every exposed "Surface. If the surface is porous,<br />
penetration of the water or water vapour carrying the acid will produce an everincreasing<br />
degree of deterioration.<br />
Limestone, when quarried and used for constructional purposes, may for a number<br />
ofyears remain insoluble in water and apparently immune to the effects ofthe weather.<br />
But, gradually, carbon dioxide is conveyed into the stone by moisture and water<br />
vapour to form soluble bicarbonate from the calcareous substrate. As the water<br />
$oluble bicarbonates are leached out of the stone by rainwater or excessive condensation,<br />
minute tunnels and cavities are formed and the stone becomes progressively<br />
more porous. Penetrating water will not only accelerate the action of the carbonic<br />
acid, but the stone is now able to act as host to algal growths. Green stains and slime<br />
begin to appear on the damp stone and, if the stone dries out, turn black and form<br />
nutrient on which more advanced .vegetable life such as lichens, mosses and advanced<br />
plant life can grow.<br />
These vegetable growths produce their own quota of acids which, sometimes, have<br />
devastating effects on old buildings. Where acids released by lichens and mosses have<br />
been conveyed down a pitched roof by rain water, which always drips on the same part<br />
of a lead gutter, it is not at all uncommon to find that the lead has become exceedingly<br />
thin or cut right through by the dissolving effect of what one expert described as<br />
malic acid. Once the lead has been penetrated and rain water can get through, the<br />
increase in the process of deterioration is usually quite sensational. Dampness inside<br />
the building resulting in fungal and insect activity can produce rapid devastation.<br />
That so many ancient buildings have survived the ravages of time and the attacks<br />
of so many different forms of biological deterioration is quite remarkable. This is<br />
more particularly so in the damp temperate conditions which generally prevail through<br />
the year in Britain than in those countries where great extremes are experienced. If<br />
very hot and dry conditions prevail for only a few weeks, they can exert a marked<br />
degree of control over the development of fungi. So, in general, fungal deterioration<br />
of buildings in Britain is more rapid than in most places on the European mainland.<br />
To compensate for this, certain insects attack timber in buildings on the Continent<br />
which do relatively little harm in Britain. In fact the termite, Reticulitermes lucifugus,<br />
which is common and a serious pest in Europe south of Paris, does not exist in the<br />
British Isles. The other serious pest on the Continent is the House Longhorn Beetle,<br />
Hylotrupes bajulus, the activities of which are confined to a relatively small area of<br />
England south-west of London. In Britain, the common range of insects which attack<br />
timber in buildings are the three Anobiids, Anobiumpunctatum, Xestobium rufovillosum<br />
and Ptilinus pectinicornis; the Lyctids: Lyetus linearis and Lyetus brunneus and the<br />
Wood Weevils, Euophryum confine and Pentarthrum huttoni. The Anobiids are,<br />
undoubtedly, the most serious of the insect pests as the Lyctids only attack the sapwood<br />
of hardwoods during the period of seasoning and rarely after ten years from<br />
felling and the Weevils require the wood to be already decayed by fungi before their<br />
attack is initiated.<br />
Of the Anobiidae, the Common Furniture Beetle, Anobium punctatum (de Geer) is<br />
the most common and is, in fact, the most widespread and economically serious pest<br />
of.building timber in Britain. It will attack the sapwood of almost every species of<br />
timber, hard or softwood, grown in the temperate regions of the world and must rank<br />
as one ofthe world's most ubiquitous pests. The second Anobiid, Xestobium rufovillosum<br />
(de Geer) which carries the sinister appellation "Death Watch Beetle" is the pest<br />
mostly associated with mediaeval buildings. It is far less common than the Furniture<br />
Beetle but its name is probably better known because of the publicity given to appeals<br />
for funds to save churches, castles, abbeys and many ancient buildings from the<br />
ravages of this insect. It favours hardwood which has, been partially decayed by fungi<br />
but .will enter softwood adjoining infested hardwood if, likewise, it is affected by fungi.<br />
The most common. fungus attacking the timber in ancient buildings and, in fact,<br />
in any buildings suffering the effects of biological deterioration in the British Isles is
58 COMMO WEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Fig. 1. A well-maintained and restored 15th-century cottage.<br />
Fig. 2. Neglect of thatch started the destruction oj' this 15th-century cottage.<br />
Fig. 3. The effect of rainwater on wattle and daub infil panels.
BIOLOGICAL DETERIORATION OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS 59'<br />
has the well-known reference in Chapter 6 of Genesis "... and God said unto Noah<br />
-make thee an ark of gopher wood, rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt<br />
pitch it within and without with pitch". Pitch in this case was pro'bably the natural<br />
bituminous deposits found in'so many parts of the Holy Land.<br />
In Britain, little evidence exists of designed preservation of building timber until<br />
comparatively recent times. The mediaeval builders relied on the durable qualities of<br />
oak to provide a reasonable "life" to their wooden structures. The method of construction<br />
also contributed to the prolonged life of many ancient ,buildings. Very few<br />
were provided with rainwater disposal systems but by generous overhang of the roof<br />
and a further overhang of the upper storeys so that the ground floor was well tucked<br />
back from splash, the walls were kept fairly dry. The buildings which succumbed to<br />
the effects of biological deterioration were, generally, those which became neglected<br />
and this neglect was the rule and result of the dreadful poverty which occurred during<br />
the Middle Ages. This poverty and the overcrowding of the dilapidated houses' contributed<br />
in no small measure to the Black Death in 1348.<br />
Poverty due to oppression was rife and, as quoted in the English Chronicle in<br />
reference to the Norman barons in the 12th century"... they filled the land with<br />
castles and they cruelly oppressed the wretched folk with castle work. When the castles<br />
were made they filled them with devils and evil men. Then took they the men who they<br />
thought any goods to have, both by night and by day, churls and women, they cast<br />
them in prison for their gold and silver, and they tortured them with pains untellable,<br />
for never were any martyrs so tortured as they were. They hanged them up by the<br />
feet and smoked them with foul smoke, they hanged them by their thumbs or by the<br />
head and hanged fires on their feet. Many thousands they killed with hunger. Then<br />
was corn dear, and flesh, cheese and butter for none there was in the land."<br />
Kings, bishops and barons fought wars one against the other and these together<br />
with frequent invasions from the Continent of Europe, particularly from France, kept<br />
the country in a state of unrest and insecurity.<br />
The Empress Matilda and King Stephen fought several, each time with devastating<br />
effect on the population and buildings. In my own city of Winchester, the local Bishop<br />
-Henry de Blois-had his own private wars, first against King Stephen, then against<br />
the Empress Matilda (widowed Empress of Germany and daughter of Henry I of<br />
England). In the latter quarrel, to quote-"raid and counter-raid, siege and countersiege<br />
succeeded one another, till almost the whole city-houses, churches and monastries<br />
alike, were consumed in the flames". Far and wide the flames spread-even the<br />
new buildings of Hyde Abbey, only erected some thirty-one years, were involved in<br />
the general conflagration. The Cathedral and St. Swithun's Priory alone escaped and<br />
that, it is said, because Robert of Gloucester generously forebore reprisals.<br />
A further civil war in the 13th century between the extravagant and weak King<br />
Henry III (Henry of Winchester)" arid a powerful Baron, Simon de Montfort, again<br />
devastated the city.<br />
It was not until the 15th and 16th centuries that order began to prevail and the<br />
common people had the money, incentive and security to care for their houses.<br />
In the CromwelIian Civil War it was, of course, the castles and noble mansions<br />
which suffered most and were destroyed by the Roundheads. It was largely due to the<br />
efforts of the church that order and prosperity, very gradually, returned. But these<br />
efforts cannot be regarded as altruistic and due to piety and pity as the church relied<br />
for its own prosperity on the prosperity of the people.<br />
It, therefore, became important for the church to improve commercial prosperity<br />
so that levies or tithes could be paid by the people to the church. The encouragement of<br />
sheep farming and export ofwool to Europe, ina very great measure, built theprosperity<br />
of England. Canals, roads and ports were developed largely by the bishops and clergy,<br />
to maintain the flow of trade and secure the flow of levies into the coffers of the<br />
church. A very large proportion of the mediaeval houses and many beautiful churches<br />
which now stand, serve as a memorial to the prosperous wool merchants who were<br />
5*
60 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
directly or indirectly responsible for their erection.<br />
These still survive a few 12th 13th and 14th century domestic dwellings, some with<br />
the roof timbers in a remarkable state of preservation. The lack of insect and fungal<br />
deterioration of this rooftimber is due to the common practice ofhaving a fireplace in<br />
the centre of the hall with an aperture in the apex of the roof through which the smoke<br />
from the wood fires escaped. The gases from the burning wood condensed on the cool<br />
timber rafters, purlins and beams and deposited the products of destructive distillation<br />
or a crude wood form of wood creosote containing phenols and other preservative<br />
chemicals. Such halls were well ventilated to encourage the smoke to rise and clear.<br />
Even when fireplaces were introduced, they were large, with huge chimneys which<br />
greatly encouraged ventilation particularly as glass windows were extremely expensive<br />
and rare until Tudor times.<br />
The relative prosperity of the Tudor period, dating from the reign of Henry VIII<br />
in the early 16th century, resulted in the employment of foreign craftsmen; Italians,<br />
Germans, Flemish, and particularly German and Flemish Protestants who sought refuge<br />
from persecution in their own countries, settled in England and began to influence<br />
the design of English Architecture, particularly the ornamentations ofwood and stone.<br />
This elaboration and ornamentation with carved finials, barge boards, brackets,<br />
corbels, cornices and the like increased the hazards ofdeterioration. Every excrescence<br />
increased the area on which rainwater could fall and accumulate and the maintenance<br />
of buildings built since the 16th century became increasingly important.<br />
The half-timbered buildings which became so popular in the late 16th and early<br />
17th centuries were, and still are, some of the most difficult to maintain in good<br />
condition. The in-filling of wattle and daub (usually clay, cow dung and chopped<br />
straw spread over a lathing of willow, hazel or split chestnut) was both insulating<br />
and durable. Although it absorbed water, it quickly released it and this peculiar<br />
mixture was extremely flexible and adhesive. The introduction of cement created<br />
complications for, where repairs were carried out with sawn laths and a cement<br />
mixture, the panels were brittle and generally shrank away from the timber framing<br />
to cause draughts and water leaks. Because of these problems, many of the halftimbered<br />
houses were later battened all over and either weather-boarded or hung<br />
with tiles which spoiled the appearance and hid the framing timbers in unventilated<br />
spaces. When water found access to this timber, fungal decay germinated and the<br />
process of decay was commenced.<br />
Others continueq to reveal the framing timbers but replaced the wattle and daub<br />
with brick in-filling, often ornamental and many in herring-bone pattern. The problem<br />
was to provide a satisfactory joint between the wood and the masonry and with<br />
varying expansion and ,contraction due to heat and water, few houses remained<br />
draught- or waterproof for long. To those who study the cause of deterioration in<br />
ancient buildings, the incursion of moisture through the walls, whether of timber,<br />
stone, brick, chalk or other material and the capillary rise of dampness in those<br />
buildings whose foundations absorb moisture from the ground provide easily apparent<br />
reasons for fungal development, insect activity and other forms of deterioration of the<br />
building fabric. Timber in direct contact with damp masonry, soil or concrete will<br />
rarely resist the attacks of fungi and timber-destroying insects for long but the cause<br />
of such deterioration is generally obvious.<br />
Less obvious is the slow but steady deterioration which occurs in the roof and<br />
flooring timbers where no apparant water leaks have occurred and where the·timber<br />
is well away from the damp walls. Even the framing of internal stud partitions on the<br />
upper floors is frequently found to be seriously damaged by organisms which require<br />
a relatively high moisture content to flourish. When investigated, this high moisture<br />
is found to be due to condensation. In domestic buildings, considerable quantities<br />
of moisture vapour released from kitchens, laundries and even from the living rooms<br />
would rise to the upper floors and sleeping accommodation which were rarely heated.<br />
This moisture-laden air rising on thermal currents from the warmed rooms below
BIOLOGICAL DETERIORATION OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS 61<br />
would precipitate water on cold plaster and wood in the very centre of the building.<br />
With every window closed and every crack and cranny sealed against draughts, the<br />
condensing moisture would accumulate in the bedrooms andattics toproduceconditions<br />
favourable to the development of slow-acting fungi, particularly fungi imperfecti.<br />
Wood attacked by such fungi becomes susceptible to wood-devouring insect attack<br />
and in such conditions the Death Watch Beetle flourished. Few houses built in the<br />
Middle Ages or even much more recently could resist the attacks of this or other<br />
wood borers. The name "Death Watch" is said to have arisen as the result of its<br />
lnating tick being heard by watchers sitting by the bedsides of dying people. As few<br />
people recovered from serious illnesses or injuries in those days, the ticking heard by<br />
those keeping vigil seemed to be associated with death, and when heard, was thought<br />
to signify that "Death was about to cross the threshold". This tapping is, ofcourse, the<br />
luating "display" of the insect.<br />
The introduction of floor levels, particularly the covering of the original earth<br />
ground floor with timber flooring, together with plaster or wooden suspended ceilings<br />
and the internal panelling of walls, all created stagnant areas where dampness of the<br />
atmosphere could reach over-saturation point and conditions favourable to fungal<br />
spore germination were created. The Dry Rot fungus, Merulius lacrymans, would<br />
have been exceedingly rare in the period when houses were single-storied, the floors<br />
just beaten earth or possibly clay and cow-dung and even those in the great halls and<br />
castles would be of stone flags simply covered with rushes, straw or other locally<br />
obtained material; and the walls of stone, wattle and daub or chalk blocks.<br />
One common method of building walls in Hampshire was to erect two fences of<br />
boards, the fences placed parallel and about two feet or more apart, separated with<br />
lengths of wood across the space. These fences served in the manner of modern<br />
concrete shuttering and the gap between them was filled with moist and well rammed<br />
down chalk. This simple material set like a soft stone, provided good insulation,<br />
rarely became damp inside and, if well-protected by an overhanging roof, would last<br />
a very long time. Such walls are always associated with thatched houses, many of<br />
which have survived for hundreds of years. Only when the roofing thatch became<br />
seriously deteriorated, generally as the result of nesting birds and rats, and rain was<br />
allowed to fall directly on to such a wall, would it start to pulverise and break up. Once<br />
moisture penetrated, the first hard frost would cause the chalk to disintegrate completely.<br />
There are several large houses in Hampshire with walls of chalk which still survive<br />
all the hazards to which such buildings are subject but many have failed because the<br />
owners, wishing to modernise the appearance of their house, had the external faces<br />
of the walls covered with cement rendering in the form of imitation stone masonry<br />
or had them rough cast with gravel, crushed stone or pebbles. In many instances, this<br />
new surface was decorated with paint. This impermeable coating trapped condensed<br />
moisture in the walls by preventing evaporation from the external faces. This trapped<br />
moisture caused fungi to develop in the spacers or lengths of wood which originally<br />
separated the shuttering and were always left in the chalk walls. If this fungus was<br />
Merulius lacrymans it quickly spread, through the chalk to the carcassing timbers<br />
of floor and roof, and unless the owner was prepared partially to demolish and rebuild,<br />
time and time again, the house had to be vacated and eventually demolished.<br />
Even when the brick-built walls became popular in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries,<br />
it was customary to build into the brickwork at regular levels and in every wall lengths<br />
ofwood called "bondingtimbers". They served the double purpose of tying the masonry<br />
together and acting as fixings for panelling, tapestry or other internal decorations.<br />
Neglect of rainwater disposal or any other reason for the wall becoming persistently<br />
damp led to the decay of these timbers, usually with devastating con "equences.<br />
In this short paper, it is impossible to cover the whole fascinating story of biological<br />
and other causes which have deprived us of so many beautiful buildings erected by<br />
our forefathers but I hope the little I have written will help in some small measure to<br />
guide those who are anxious to conserve our priceless and irreplaceable relics of<br />
building evolution.
THE PROFESSIONAL FORESTER IN INDUSTRY •<br />
BY CRAIG ANDERSON<br />
Chairman, S.A. Timber Growers Association<br />
I AM VERY honoured indeed, as a layman, to be asked to address such a distinguished<br />
company of professional foresters as is gathered here tonight.<br />
In addressing you mayI say that some ofthe suggestions I make may be controversial<br />
and you may heartily disagree with what I have to say; if so, I crave your indulgence.<br />
Firstly, then, I am more than astonished at the manner in which a great industry<br />
such as ours employs managerial people to run, protect and exploit its forests, yet<br />
pays them a mere pittance compared with other industries. Consider the manager of a<br />
3,500 acre timber estate, the value of which is probably around R350,OOO. What will<br />
he get as a salary? The answer is probably half to a third as much as would the manager<br />
of an engineering firm of like value. Yet the existing position of forest manager is<br />
tolerated by these very managers themselves, perhaps because they feel that they are<br />
not strong enough to do anything about it. Nevertheless, are the employers not<br />
morally wrong in continuing to pay in this niggardly fashion, or is the price of timber<br />
too low to justify an improvement?<br />
My next point touches on dangerous ground, since it questions whether the university<br />
training of the professional forester is adequate and whether it is not too academic<br />
and remote to be of real practical value. Is the student taught to be a leader when he<br />
leaves university or is he merely a walking silvicultural encyclopaedia? Can he, and<br />
is he fitted to take over the running of a timber estate? Is he suited at that stage to be<br />
put over the heads of older foresters with years of experience?<br />
I feel that the answer to this question is simply that he is not capable of taking over<br />
an estate, and because of this the professional has tended, in many instances, to be<br />
disregarded by commercial forestry, which feels that it can get along without these<br />
people. This is both very unfortunate and positively ridiculous. Are there not two<br />
approaches to the big business of forestry today? Do we not have two avenues along<br />
which a professional forester can move? Firstly, that of pure research and secondly<br />
that offorestry management, and should our future students not be trained along these<br />
diverging lines according to their bent.<br />
If you will accept that what I have said has merit, then may I have the temerity to<br />
suggest we go a step further and propose a method by which both these ends could<br />
be achieved. My proposal is based partly on a doctor's training. Here we have a chap<br />
who does a five-year course for his degree, but only after he has done a further two<br />
years house work, does his degree have real value. From then onwards he may safely<br />
and often profitably adventure out into the hard world, a competent leader in his<br />
own sphere capable ofrising to any heights. Can our professional foresters not achieve<br />
the same end?<br />
Supposing, just supposing, the aspirant forester was to follow this course<br />
(1) In order to' understand what goes on in forestry and whether he likes it or not he<br />
completes one year's practical work at Saasveld.<br />
(2) Having decided to take his degree he now does three years at Stellenbosch and,<br />
after the first year, he decides whether to follow the boffin trail to pure research or<br />
the commercial trail to forestry management.<br />
(3) In the case of the boffin, after obtaining his degree, he becomes a researcher and<br />
here industry and the state must provide him with adequate funds for his work<br />
and must not interfere with his work at all.<br />
(4) In the case of the forestry management student he must have a sound silvicultural<br />
knowledge, but not in the depth taught to the boffin. He must learn to carry out<br />
work studies, plantation management and have a sound knowledge of general<br />
economics, so that, theoreticallY, he is in a position to manage an estate. Thereafter,<br />
having qualified, he too must follow the doctor's trail, and do two years of houselie<br />
An address given at a dinner of the Institute of <strong>Forestry</strong> held in Pietermaritzburg on 19th<br />
May, 1969. By courtesy ofSouth African <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal.<br />
62
THE LOCH NESS MONSTER<br />
D. G. GOWLER<br />
Executive Officer, Headquarters, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />
(By courtesy ofthe Author and the Editor ofthe Journal of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.)<br />
LOCH NESS is 24 miles ,long, up to 1t miles wide, over 700 feet deep for most of its<br />
length, and almost completely surrounded by forests. It is longer than the width of<br />
the English Channel at Dover and is four times as deep as the Channel at its deepest,<br />
and has never been known to freeze. It is situated in the Great Glen of Scotland, an<br />
enormous "rift valley" formed when the entire northern part ofScotland was wrenched<br />
sixty miles to the west following a gigantic upheaval in bygone ages. The loch was<br />
undoubtedly connected at one time to the sea, probably at both extremities, and<br />
although it is now considered a fresh-water lake, there is every possibility that at some<br />
distance below the surface there is still salt-water, a reminder of its ancient connection<br />
with the sea. (A 1,100 feet deep Canadian lake has recently been found to have a<br />
mixture ofsea-water-probably thousands ofyears old-below400 feet. Unfortunately,<br />
no such investigation has yet been carried out at Loch Ness.) Visibility in the loch is<br />
practically nil, due to the amount of peat content washed into it by the many streams<br />
and rivers entering from the surrounding countryside. The sides of the loch are<br />
extremely steep; at Cormorant Rock it plunges sharply to a depth of 236 feet just fifty<br />
feet from the bank!<br />
The loch is not, therefore, a very prepossessing sight and is a natural focus of local<br />
superstition. One can imagine local mothers chastising their children with the threat<br />
of "bogey-men" and "monsters" rising out of this sombre expanse of water and<br />
carrying off all those children who were naughty. The phenomenon of Loch Ness<br />
might well have remained as mere local superstition if it had not been for the overwhelming<br />
number ofactual sightings ofthe so-called "monster" by reputable witnesses.<br />
The Loch Ness phenomenon is by no means a recent acquisition to the fauna of<br />
Scotland. According to legend it has always harboured a "beastie" or "water kelpie";<br />
and the first written account of the creature dates way back to the middle of the sixth<br />
century A.D. when St. Columba was visiting Brude, King of the Northern Picts, at<br />
Inverness. According to Adamnan, St. Columba's biographer, writing a century after<br />
the event, the holy man reached the banks of the loch as the local inhabitants were<br />
burying one of their number who had been bitten to death by the "monster". Despite<br />
this, he instructed one of his followers to swim to the other side of the loch and return<br />
with a boat that had been moored there. The man had not been in the water long<br />
before the "monster" arrived on the scene, making a bee-line for the now panicstricken<br />
swimmer. But St. Columba muttered a few prayers and ordered the "monster"<br />
to leave the man alone. Needless to say, the "monster", on hearing the voice of the<br />
blessed man, turned tail and fled. Regular sightings of the creature have been made<br />
from that day to this.<br />
The frequency of the sightings of the animal increased tremendously in 1933, and<br />
this was solely due to the widening of a road (the A.82) along the northern side of the<br />
loch. The blasting necessary for the road's construction sent shock-waves the length<br />
and breadth of the loch and agitated the animal into an unusual outburst of activity.<br />
A Ness Fisheries Board representative estimates that every year since 1933 there have<br />
been 20 to 30 sightings reported that he would regard as genuine. The number of<br />
reports accepted as genuine and inexplicable by the Loch Ness Phenomena Investigation<br />
Bureau since 1963 has been: 1963-40, 1964-18, 1965-9, 1966-29. The modernization<br />
of the A.82 mainroad has enabled more people to have long uninterrupted looks<br />
at the loch than at any other time in history, and consequently the number ofsightings<br />
has increased considerably. Witnesses to the existence of the animal come from all<br />
walks oflife: churchmen, policemen, gamekeepers, mayors, labourers, monks, Members<br />
of Parliament, and even <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission workers!<br />
6'
66 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
:generated to force it to surface once-again. This may be an explanation of a few of the<br />
sightings ofthe L.N.M., but it is hopelessly inadequate when, as in most ofthe sightings,<br />
"the animal has been seen to move at quite rapid speeds across the surface of the loch.<br />
Turning to the "animal" explanations, we find very little in the second category arid<br />
these can be dismissed fairly easily. The most popular culprits here are the long-necked<br />
seal, the otter, and the red deer. They can all be discounted as being the.cause of the<br />
Loch Ness phenomenon purely on the question of size. But it is worth mentioning<br />
them as they can undoubtedly provide the answer to three or four of the reported<br />
sightings. The seal, like some other animals, is able to stretch its neck to quite a<br />
considerable degree, and it is a popular theory that this could account for the reports<br />
of"long necks" seen above the surface ofthe loch. No importance seems to be attached<br />
to the fact that the presence of seal is unknown in Loch Ness. The popularity of the<br />
otter theory has increased quite considerably over the past couple of years because of<br />
the support given it by a prominent naturalist. Otters can account for the one or two<br />
reports of five to eight humped sightings, but, although otters can reach a length of<br />
over 5i feet, they can in no way account for the bulk of the sightings which refer to<br />
large, powerful, solid humps up to thirty feet long. A red deer stag when swimming<br />
across the loch can fit extremely well some of the descriptions of the head and neck<br />
of the L.N.M., particularly when mention is made of two horn-like protuberances.<br />
This may account for four or five sightings.<br />
The third category is much more feasible than the second. Giant fish of all types<br />
have often been put forward as the "monster". A giant sturgeon is by far the favourite<br />
of armchair amateur detectives because a diagrammatic representation of a sturgeon<br />
lying just below the water surface with its snout and bony back ridges protruding<br />
above the surface looks very much like some ofthereports ofmany-humped "monsters".<br />
But practically all fish can be dismissed from our quest for the answer because the<br />
animal in Loch Ness must be able to survive for some time out of water to account<br />
for the sightings of it on land. Even the fish-theorists cannot explain how a 30-foot<br />
"monster" was seen to cross a main road before disappearing into the loch! Giant<br />
molluscs offer more reasonable explanations, and would account for the lack of fossil<br />
remains and the variable back postures. The Loch Ness Phenomena Investigation<br />
Bureau considers a giant marine slug as presenting fewer difficulties than any other<br />
present-day theory. Perhaps the most acceptable of the theories in this category is that<br />
of the giant eel. The larvae of eels, called leptocephali, are normally about three inches<br />
long and develop into six foot eels when "adult. In 1930, a Danish student caught a<br />
giant sea eel larva in the South Atlantic that was six feet long. Considering that the<br />
giant larva was at the same stage of development as an ordinary eel larva and that its<br />
growth must follow the same proportions, the adult sea eel emerging from this larva<br />
must reach a length of well over 60 feet. This could be the answer to the mystery of the<br />
often seen "giant sea serpent" as well as to our local Loch Ness problem. It is known<br />
th'at many ordinary eels live in Loch Ness and there seems to be no reason why their<br />
giant relations could not also be accommodated. The one stumbling block to this<br />
explanation is the sightings of the L.N.M. on land. Eels can exist out of water for<br />
a short period, but whether it can stay on land as long as the L.N.M. has been reported<br />
to do is a matter for conjecture.<br />
It seems, then, that we are left with our last category to provide us with the answer<br />
we are looking for. It is very difficult to analyze a completely unknown animal and<br />
we must approach this problem in a different way. From the evidence produced by<br />
the numerous recorded sightings, we have been able to build up a picture of what<br />
the animal in Loch Ness must look like. But what can it be? The most<br />
striking aspect is the amazing similarity it has with the prehistoric plesiosaur family.<br />
Is it a plesiosaur? It certainly has the required shape and, just as important, the right<br />
size. But scientists tell us that the plesiosaur became extinct over a hundred million<br />
years ago. This is true. But it is also true that these same scientists insisted that the<br />
coelacanth, a pre-historic fish, had died out seventy million years ago but a specimen
COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
of this was dredged up off the coast of South Africa in 1958! It therefore becomes<br />
impossible to argue that because plesiosaurs are thought to be extinct there is no<br />
chance offinding one alive today. A plesiosaur, or more probably a close relative that<br />
has adapted to its present conditions, is the only answer we have that fits all the facts<br />
in our possession. All fictional detectives have said at one time or another that the<br />
theory must be chosen to cover all the facts and not the facts to fit the theory. Sherlock<br />
Holmes often said to the ever-faithful Watson that when the impossible had been<br />
eliminated, that which was left, however improbable, must be the truth!<br />
Postscript<br />
The most important occurrence at Loch Ness since the original publication of this<br />
article was the Great Search of 1969, organised by Independent Television News and<br />
the Loch Ness Phenomena Investigation Bureau. The Search lasted two weeks and<br />
consisted mainly of sonar sweeping from both a fixed base and a moving boat. Also<br />
there to lend a helping hand was a small, yellow, home-made, fibre-glass submarine,<br />
which unfortunately proved a complete failure.<br />
In fact, the only evidence that the Great Search uncovered was found by Birmingham<br />
University who were operating a sonar fixed to Temple Pier in Urquhart Bay. The<br />
sonar looked straight across the loch which is nearly two miles wide at this point and<br />
reaches a depth of over 650 feet. The cathode ray display of the sonar was filmed at<br />
ten second intervals over the two weeks of the Search and one sequence lasting about<br />
thirteen minutes has proved to be very interesting.<br />
This sequence shows a large object rise from the bottom of the loch and then move<br />
away from the sonar out of range. The size of this object is assessed to be at least 160<br />
feet long and 65 feet high. It is not thought to have been a single object as it appeared to<br />
have individual components which dispersed slightly as it moved away. A little later<br />
the object returned and settled back into its original position, but it was not as large<br />
as in its ascent. The maximum horizontal velocity is estimated to be 6.5 knots and the<br />
maximum vertical rise about one hundred feet per minute.<br />
The fact that the object moved at a high speed in a horizontal as well as vertical plane<br />
rules out the possibility of it being inanimate. It has to be an animal, or animals, of<br />
some kind. It is not possible to say what it can be, except that it is unlikely to be fish<br />
due to the high speed of ascent and descent.<br />
The rest of this highly scientific search unfortunately produced a complete blank.<br />
Although it is interesting to note that while the technicians were fiddling around with<br />
their instruments, ten ordinary people, mainly tourists, claimed to have seen the L.N.M.!
'The Editor,<br />
The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> <strong>Review</strong>,<br />
London.<br />
SIR,<br />
CORRESPONDENCE<br />
The End of <strong>Forestry</strong> in Great Britain<br />
THE WHITE CoTFAOE,<br />
BANK,<br />
LYNDHURST,<br />
HANTS.<br />
I HAD HEARD only garbled stories of Professor Richardson's Address to the British Association<br />
for the Advancement ofScience (reprinted in your REVIEW, VoI. 49 (4), No. 142) when he and I<br />
inter alia were called upon to appear on I.T.A. to discuss what he calls environmental problems<br />
in the New Forest. It was at once clear to me, and perusal of his Address makes it more so,<br />
that whereas Prof. Richardson in some 20 years of post graduate forestry, skimming over<br />
111any foreign lands, may have picked up a kaleidoscopic understanding ofhis chosen profession,<br />
he has had quite inadequate opportunity to study the psychology of the various races, far less<br />
that of the natives of Britain.<br />
He feels a little guilt about his retreat from productive forestry but he makes a very unconvincing<br />
excuse for his adoption of his new environmental forest policy. He could be more<br />
honest: he could say that in his opinion (which few others could possibly share) productive<br />
foresty in Britain is totally unnecessary and so we might as well abandon all forms of forestry<br />
completely. But of course that would be suicidal for his Department and for himself.<br />
His only argument for continuing to foster woodlands seems to be that the tourist public<br />
wants to have its urban manners concealed behind trees. That alone shows that Richardson<br />
has made no serious attempt to study the behaviour of the city holiday-maker. The majority<br />
like the clear open spaces: they like to have a backcloth of trees, rocks or gorse bushes nearby.<br />
They do not like the interior of a Hans Andersen dark and gloomy forest, whether it be<br />
composed of conifers or of contorted and senile hardwoods. Richardson should pay personal<br />
visits to Dartmoor, Exmoor, the Peak, the open heathlands of the New Forest or even the<br />
hills immediately behind his own University of North Wales.<br />
But I concede that there is tremendous scope for integrating good forest management<br />
(including the production of very good timber) with good tourist attraction of the type which<br />
gracious Whitehall has christened "quiet recreation". I am in absolute agreement too that<br />
we shall never fully attain that integration so long as net discounted revenue has to remain the<br />
graven image at which all foresters, however unwillingly, be forced to worship. <strong>Forestry</strong> in<br />
Britain lost all faith with the Great British Public when short term profit was voiced as the<br />
top priority ideal and it will take many years and much hard work to regain their faith in a<br />
true <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission's true policy.<br />
I do not know why the principles ofmultiple land use, which had hardly begun to be properly<br />
understood, should suddenly have becomesomething"square".Afterallin this highly populated<br />
island we do genuinely need our own timber (vide all the huge new timber using industries<br />
which it has brought into gainful and socially vital existence) and we do also need quiet<br />
recreational facilities. They can both be catered for. Some forests or parts offorests can well be<br />
devoted almost entirely to bulk production: others must give much greater concessions to<br />
visitors and can be made specially attractive to visitors. That will create marvellous forests of<br />
great diversity and of great timber.<br />
Richardson seems to give no reasons at all why his urban recreations should be brought<br />
out into the forests: they would be more accessible, more suitable and thus more valuable<br />
both socially and financially if they were developed in the urban or suburban places where<br />
greater crowds would come to enjoy them. Why should we go out of our way to drag town<br />
dwelling holidaymakers out to the forests for them to enjoy their football, discotheques, zoos,<br />
hotels and old peoples' homes?<br />
Richardson should start a new series of world tours-or he could even stay in Britainto<br />
see what the seeker after "quiet recreation" and the seeker after urban pleasures really want.<br />
He can put up comfortably in his town hotel and very much later, full ofwise saws and modem<br />
instances, in his old peoples' home, having found out what the two kinds ofpeople are looking<br />
for. Never the twain need meet.<br />
Yours etc.<br />
GroaoE RYLE<br />
69
70 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
The Editor,<br />
The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> <strong>Review</strong>,<br />
London W.C.2.<br />
Production <strong>Forestry</strong> in Great Britain<br />
FOUNTAIN FORESTRY LTD.<br />
SPITCHWICK MANOR,<br />
POUNDSGATE<br />
NEWTON ABBOT<br />
DEVON.<br />
PROFESSOR RICHARDSON spoils an interesting argument by over-statement.<br />
He sets the sights for production forestry too low. If proper use is made of our land, and<br />
we fall into line with other European countries, our area under forestry will enable the establisment<br />
of far more production areas that he envisages, quite rightly, on present acreages. It is<br />
a duty of all foresters to bring about this state of affairs.<br />
At the other end of the scale, 'undoubtedly suitable woodland areas exist near our towns for<br />
capital intensive public recreational areas. But the Professor fails to make the point that huge<br />
additional capital investment is so essential to such schemes that the original forestry investment<br />
is. of ve,ry minor importance.<br />
Commercially, the woodland owner in Britain will never have the seller's market for anlenity<br />
that exists in countries like Denmark and Holland because, contrary to popular belief, there<br />
are many millions ofacres ofwild open spaces in Britain available to the public. Any practising<br />
forester who has tried to make money out of recreation without a huge injection of additional<br />
capital will confirm that no seller's market exists.<br />
Chances exist on the other hand for successful multiple use in the intermediate areas between<br />
the intensive production forests and the near-urban areas. Specialist markets, at prices which<br />
recognise the fact that a service is given, as well as cellulose supplied, will expand.<br />
Finally, it is dangerous in the extreme to assume that tropical forests will supply our needs<br />
in the years to come. Transportation costs all over the world are rising fast; the capital necessary<br />
to develop communications in tropical areas will be expensive and need to be serviced; and<br />
inhabitants of those areas will be increasing their own timber consumption-note the fact<br />
quoted in your December REVIEW that African countlies are importing more than $150 mworth<br />
of pulp and paper alone already. And the developing countries are becoming richer and<br />
therefore their labour more expensive.<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
B. N. HOWELL
72 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
which facilitate visual comparison of different climatic regimes. In a future edition of this<br />
book, if there should be one, some standardisation of method would be most desirable so that<br />
conditions in different countries could be compared on a meaningful basis.<br />
In many of the monographs, geological and soil factors have been described in great detail,<br />
sometimes to the point of irrelevancy. While a good knowledge of the soil and site typology<br />
and particularly of those factors directly affecting afforestation and the growth of trees is<br />
essential, geological and soil descriptions need to be kept in balance and not allowed to become<br />
displays of erudition of interest only to geologists and pedologists. The concise descriptions of<br />
the geology and soils of the Middle East countries by Oedekoven set an example and are very<br />
much to the point. It is curious, however, that, throughout the book, so little is said about<br />
nutrient deficiencies and fertiliser requirements, and no mention at all is made of minor<br />
element deficiencies such as boron which is often so important to the Browth and even survival<br />
of Eucalyptus plantations in N. Africa.<br />
The accounts of the hydrology of the arid areas turn out to be particularly interesting and<br />
important. Whether rivers are perennial or flowing only for short periods, the occurrence of<br />
flash floods and erosion etc. emphasise the needs for protection forestry. The presence or<br />
absence of underground soil moisture within reach of the roots of planted trees determines in<br />
many cases what species can or cannot be grown and what level ofproduction can be expected.<br />
Similarly, the availability or otherwise of irrigation can completely alter the prospects of<br />
economic forestry in arid areas. .<br />
The descriptions of the natural vegetation in the various countries are mostly suitable for<br />
the purpose and generally emphasise the physiognomic rather than the floristic aspects of the<br />
flora. This, together with the descriptions of the soils and relief, gives a clear picture of the<br />
conditions affecting any schemes of afforestation.<br />
The sections on human occupation and forms of land use are very important as determining<br />
the needs of the population and the purposes and aims of afforestation. In most countries the<br />
protective aims, e.g. preventing wind and water erosion or amelioration of climatic conditions<br />
have high priority. In productive forestry, the provision offirewood is frequently of over-riding<br />
importance, coupled in some cases with poles for house-building and wood for agricultural<br />
implements. The production of timber for industrial processing usually does not come into the<br />
picture at all in these very dry areas.<br />
The greatest ,interest to foresters lies in the sections dealing with the choice of species,<br />
techniques of afforestation and the results achieved. Here again, the reports from different<br />
countries are very variable and reflect the amount of systematic research that has been done<br />
in them. Particularly full and informative accounts have been given for the U.S.A. (by<br />
Stoeckler), Australia (by 10hnston and Hall), Southern Sahara and Sahel (by Fishwick),<br />
and India/Pakistan (by Kaul), but there is something to be learnt from almost all the reports.<br />
It is curious, for instance, that in the U.S.A., where afforestation ofarid areas is highly efficient<br />
and to a large extent mechanised, the use of polythene containers is only mentioned as an<br />
experimental idea whereas it is in general use in arid zone afforestation in Africa and most<br />
other countries in the eastern hemisphere, where the method is regarded as a break-through,<br />
eliminating nursery risks and ensuring higher survival in the field than any other method.<br />
From India comes the interesting suggestion that the "chlorophyll stability index" of a species<br />
or of a provenance can be used as a valid criterion for making initial selections for droughthardiness<br />
for planting in places where the trees will be growing near the threshold of survival.<br />
(CSI is not here defined nor is the method for its determination given.)<br />
In all countries where water is in short supply, the methods of ground preparation are of<br />
vital importance, both for catching and conserving what little rainfall there is and ensuring<br />
that as much of it as possible is made available to the planted trees, and also for removing<br />
initial competition ofexisting vegetation and producing conditions where clean weeding during<br />
the early stages ofestablishment can be done economically. Many different methods ofcarrying<br />
out these operations are described by the various countries and make interesting comparative<br />
reading.<br />
Special mention must be made ofthe two reports by M. Petrov on the U.S.S.R. and Central<br />
Asia respectively. Closely written in highly technical language and using a number of local<br />
terms unfamiliar to English readers, (the Editor could have helped by providing definitions),<br />
they give a great wealth of detail about the arid areas of these countries, the formidable problems<br />
they have had to face and the truly remarkable results they have achieved often under<br />
exceedingly difficult conditions. Emphasis is laid on a full knowledge of the typology of the<br />
sites before attempting reclamative afforestation. Techniques have been developed for controlling<br />
shifting sands under cold desert conditions to an extent unmatched anywhere. The
74 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
even if their eventual use is only firewood. Many of the other eucalypts at first glance are well<br />
outside their normal site requirements.<br />
Turning to conifers one wonders why they should even be considered in drought prevalent<br />
areas where fire is regarded as an agricultural instrument and a careless match could eliminate<br />
large areas. One may further question the use ofcallitris which may survive on poor soil but is<br />
itself a soil impoverisher. (Personal experience. Patana plantations, Ceylon.)<br />
An angle which is not discussed in the paper is the future status of successfully established<br />
areas. Growing timber, poles or firewood on a bare forest floor does not solve the problem.<br />
The establishment of a woody undergrowth is essential if soil improvement is to be attained<br />
and conditions established for the eventual planting of a more lucrative crop. Incidentally<br />
no mention is made of the use of Acioa barteri as either a fire break or as a nurse crop. Has<br />
this been tried?<br />
E.W.M.<br />
World Timbers. Vo!. 3, Asia and Australia and New Zealand. Compiled and Edited<br />
by B. J. Rendle. Ernest Benn Ltd. £5.25.<br />
THIS IS THE third and final volume of Mr. Rendle's World Timbers series. Like the two earlier<br />
volumes the standard of production, binding and presentation of coloured plates are of the<br />
highest order.<br />
In his Introduction the Editor says "Many species ofeconomic significance in their countries<br />
of origin have had to be omitted-". This is undoubtedly true, so much so that after a perusal<br />
of the volume one is left with the impression that it might well have been expanded to two<br />
separate volumes, one covering Asia and the other Australia and New Zealand, to give a fuller<br />
world coverage of better known timbers. In spite of this comment foresters and timbermen,<br />
not forgetting students, are indebted to Mr. Rendle for his presentation of World Timbers<br />
in the three volumes now published.<br />
Each timber is, as in the earlier volumes, described in some detail, its structural properties,<br />
working properties, durability and uses are effectively described. A minor criticism in this<br />
context; the sapwood ofEast Indian Satinwood is very noticeable even in a freshly cut log and<br />
in months, rather than years, decays and comes away cleanly from the heartwood if untreated<br />
and exposed to the weather.<br />
In the Asian section the old-world timbers from India, Burma and Ceylon mingle with the<br />
more recently publicised Dipterocarps of Malaysia. In the Australian section there are the<br />
better known Eucalypts, the indigenous conifers of Australia and New Zealand and, that ubiquitous<br />
exotic, Radiata pine.<br />
The two previous volumes have been well received by the technical Press. In conclusion one<br />
can only say that the three volumes now provide a standard reference work on World Timbers<br />
a work which should stand the test of time.<br />
E.W.M.<br />
Native Trees of Canada. By R. C. Hosie. Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service: Department of<br />
Fisheries and <strong>Forestry</strong>. Queen's Printer for Canada, Ottawa (1969). Seventh Edition,<br />
completely re-written and re-illustrated. Pp. 380, lavishly illustrated with some 26<br />
photos in full colour and 750 in black-and-white, plus 200 line drawings and 150<br />
sketch maps. Price $5 paper-bound, $8 cloth bound.<br />
THIS STANDARD TEXTBOOK first appeared in 1917 under the authorship of Messrs Morton and<br />
Lewis. It has now been completely re-shaped by an impressive ten-man team of foresters,<br />
botanists, photographers and artists, headed by"Mr. Hosie, and the result is great credit to the<br />
Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service, as well as to all who took part. It covers every tree native to the<br />
Dominion, but no introduced exotic kinds.<br />
The main body of the text consists of two-page illustrated descriptions for a single tree, and<br />
no fewer than 140 kinds are treated in this way. A typical entry includes a silhouette drawing of<br />
the growing tree, and a map ofits natural distribution. Foliage, bark, winter twigs, flowers and<br />
fruit are each shown by eight or ten photos, and features that aid identification are separately<br />
depicted. The standard pattern of text includes growth form, habitat, size, leaves, flowers,<br />
fruit, twigs, bark, wood, general importance in the woodland scene, and some fascinating<br />
discursive notes on some topic peculiar to each tree.<br />
More general chapters describe the forests of Canada and their nine characteristic regions,<br />
and tell the beginner how trees may be recognised. There are comprehensive descriptions of
76 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Untersuehung uOOr forstliche Konzessionen. Ein Beitrag zur Forderung der Forstwirt..<br />
schaft in den Entwicldungslandern. By F. Schmithuesen (1969). Schriftenreihe der<br />
Landesforstverwaltung Baden-Wurttemberg, Band 30, Stuttgart.<br />
THE AUTHOR BASES his thesis on timber concessions onfirst-hand information which he gathered<br />
during a year in British Columbia and a year in tropical Latin America. The material is complemented<br />
by a source study at Oxford, Nogent-sur-Marne and Rome. The general survey<br />
of the legal situation in the boreal and tropical countries emphasises the differences of land<br />
tenure in countries with English, 'French or Iberian legal tradition. Consequently, legal provisions<br />
and technical organisation of forest utilisation vary considerably. Also, the capacity<br />
for meeting forest owners requirements varied widely between individuals and types of concessionaires.<br />
Equal and uniform treatment is, therefore, often impossible. Concessions are<br />
the only practicable form of organising forest utilisation in tropical countries, in which forest<br />
land is predominantly publicly owned, and in which infrastructure, governmental organisation,<br />
industry and domestic markets are poorly developed. The author surveys management and<br />
organisational practices of the concession systems in the more important timber-producing<br />
countries in the tropics and in North America. He compares the historical development of<br />
the various systems and includes a comparison to the concession system of 18th century<br />
Germany. The author believes that any concession system will enventually be replaced by sale<br />
of standing or logged timber by the forest owner. This would mean state forestry in most<br />
tropical and many boreal countries. An alternative would be the transfer of responsibility<br />
for all forestry operations to the concessionaire under long-term leases. In the reviewers<br />
opinion, the latter alternative offers greater advantages from a business and a national economic<br />
point-of-view, but the former will probably in the long run enjoy political preference. The<br />
value of the book to tropical foresters is the synoptic review of problems and practices of the<br />
concession systems within and outside the tropics. The inclusion of the historical concession<br />
systems ofCentral Europe adds an interesting time perspective to the problem.<br />
The conclusion emerges convincingly that direction and momentum of forestry development<br />
in tropical countries will be determined by the wiIJingness or capability of governments to<br />
guarantee tenure and supplies at a scale and under conditions which make long-term industrial<br />
developments in the form ofintegrated forest industries feasible.<br />
E. F. BRUNIG<br />
Flora Zambesiaca, Vol. 3, part 1. J. P. M. Brenan et al. Crown Agents for Overseas<br />
Governments and Administrations, London (1970). Price £1.25.<br />
THE APPEARANCE OF another part of this excellent Flora is most welcome. The four earlier parts<br />
appeared in 1960, 1961, 1963 and 1966, so the interval between successive parts has steadily<br />
increased by a year at a time. This is clearly an unsatisfactory situation which, I understand,<br />
has arisen from administrative difficulties and not from a slowing-down in the botanical<br />
preparation. There is, I believe, a good deal of material awaiting publication, and it is greatly<br />
to be hoped that arrangements will be made to speed up the publication of this Flora, which<br />
is of basic importance to foresters and others concerned with biological natural resources in<br />
this part of Africa.<br />
The recent part consists of the Mimosoideae, and is mainly the work of Mr. Brenan. As this<br />
group has now been done for the Flora ofTropical East Africa, the Flore du Congo Beige, the<br />
Conspectus Florae Angolensis and the revised Flora of West Tropical Africa, it must be one of<br />
the best known ofall groups offlowering plants in tropical Africa. The subfamily is represented<br />
by 15 genera in Flora Zambesiaca, including the genera Acacia (with 64 species) and Albizia<br />
(with 19 species). As all who know something about tropical African botany will appreciate,<br />
Mr. Brenan's authorship of this part is a sure guarantee of excellence, and this is indeed<br />
a model of what a flora should be.<br />
R. W. J. KEAY<br />
Standard Volume Tables for Coniferous Species of Northern West Pakistan Forest<br />
Record No. 2 1969.<br />
Local Volume Tables of the Coniferous Species of Northern West Pakistan By<br />
Muhammad Azam Malik. Forest Record No. 3 1970. Forest Research Series,<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Research Division, Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar.<br />
THESE TWO PUBLICATIONS mark an important advance in Pakistan forestry. A sound basis on<br />
which to estimate the volume ofgrowing stock is ofsuch obvious importance for the planning<br />
and control of the national forest estate that justification for these publications is hardly
NEW BOOKS AND PUBLICATIONS 77<br />
necessary. The general volume tables previously in use were issued by the Indian Forest<br />
Institute forty years ago, and it is known that they were of very doubtful reliability when<br />
applied to the forests ofWest Pakistan.<br />
Tables are given for Cedrus deodora, Pinus grifJithii, P. roxburghii, Abies pindrow and Picea<br />
smithiana. The region was classified into eight catchment areas in each of which at least 200<br />
trees of each species were measured. Sites on which sample trees were selected were classified<br />
into strata (four in the case of Deodar and six for the other species), based on altitude and<br />
aspect to ensure an overall sample representative of the region. Volume was calculated from<br />
the regression V==a+bH+cD2+dD2H (where V==volume under bark, D==diameter at<br />
breast height and H==total height) in all cases. This model was selected as the most suitable<br />
from a number tested in a previous study. Both total and stem-wood volumes (down to an<br />
8-inch diameter point), excluding branchwood, were fitted to this model. Some difficulty was<br />
encountered in reconciling inconsistencies between the total and stem-wood volume tables so<br />
derived. Therefore small-wood volumes (the difference between total volume and stem-wood<br />
volume) were related graphically to diameter (height being shown to be unimportant) and<br />
separate small-wood single entry tables obtained. Either the total volume regression or the stem<br />
volume regression was chosen as the basis for a particular table and the other table (total or<br />
stem volume) derived by subtraction or addition, as appropriate, of the small-wood volume.<br />
This method was preferred, in the reviewer's view mistakenly, to a regression method relating<br />
stem volume to total volume for any size class. Sets oftables for all three "volumes" are printed<br />
in full.This appears unnecessary as only two sets give independent information. The expense<br />
saved could have been better spent in improving the legibility of the essential tables. As it is,<br />
the print size in some of the larger tables (produced by an offset process) is incoveniently small.<br />
One of the main advantages of the regression method of volume table construction is its<br />
flexibility and the ease in which additional data can be incorporated to improve the relationships<br />
between volume and the easily measured variables diameter and height. It is hoped,<br />
therefore, that provision will be made for the regular updating and checking of the tables<br />
in order to improve their precision and reliability as further data become available. It would<br />
have been reassuring if some reference to future revision had been made.<br />
The Local Volume tables published separately as Forest Record No. 3 are derived directly<br />
from the general volume tables using the quadratic relationship H=a+bD+cD2. These are<br />
produced for easy application in the field by local staff.<br />
The Pakistan Forest Institute is to be congratulated on the production of these tables and<br />
we look forward to seeing a further publication in this new series ofForest Records.<br />
P. G. ADLARD<br />
My Life My Trees. Richard St. Barbe Baker, Lutterworth Press, London, £2.00.<br />
IN 1944 RICHARD ST. BARBE BAKER wrote his first autobiography-I Planted Trees. Now in 1970<br />
as an octogenarian he writes his second autobiography. This latter work like the earlier one<br />
starts in his boyhood days and with the last 24 years gives a story of three-quarters<br />
of a century of dedication to tree-planting and conservation. Throughout the book the author<br />
keeps pace with world thinking and world trends towards trees and conservation. During<br />
his long active life he visited most parts of the World, firstly as a Colonial Forest Officer, later<br />
as a free-lance self appointed high priest of conservation. Kenya-the Aberdare Mountains;<br />
Nigeria-Sapoba; the Redwoods of America; Canada; India; Pakistan; the Saharan Territories;<br />
all figure in his many world-wide peregrinations. At the age of 74 we find him doing a<br />
solo ride of some 1200 miles from North to South of New Zealand, now his adopted home.<br />
During much of his career professional forest officers have tended to denigrate many of his<br />
activities on the grounds that they were not original. There may be a certain amount of truth<br />
in this but at least he had the courage of his convictions and preached what he believed. In<br />
his long life ofconservation crusading he has devoted all his energies to planting trees, whether<br />
on original, right or wrong lines does not in one iota detract from his self-dedication to his<br />
cause.<br />
Throughout the book is woven the story of The Men 0/the Trees founded by the author in<br />
Kenya in 1924, and now a well-established and flourishing national body. Richard S1. Barbe<br />
Baker will be remembered for this long after petty squabbles over the authenticity of some<br />
of his claims are forgotten.<br />
Peach stones in the Sahara, let us regard these as symbolic.<br />
E.W.M.
78 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
1969 Bulletin of the Nigerian <strong>Forestry</strong> Departments<br />
IT IS MOST interesting to read a Bulletin after an interval of perhaps fifteen years. It has grown<br />
up and is vastly different from the old Home Chat of earlier days. So too has the Research<br />
Department developed. D. R. Rosevear describes, with interesting reminiscences, his school,<br />
the first Forest School in Nigeria, for Eastern Provinces Forest Guards in the middle 1920s;<br />
R. W. J. Keay recollects some highlights ofhis years at the Forest School for Forest Assistants<br />
in the middle 194Os, when teaching required more supporting research, and to indicate present<br />
standards the Staff disposition of the Federal Research Department at the end of 1969 lists<br />
no fewer than 61 officers ofvarious kinds, plus 7 FAO officers at the Savanna Research Station.<br />
There is an obituary notice about G. A. E. Ogbe, CCF. Mid-West, an appreciation of the<br />
services of J. G. C. Allen, retiring Secretary of the Nigerian Timber Association and a list of<br />
eight International Seminars and Conferences attended by Forest Dept. delegates-changed<br />
days from the old five-yearly high spot of Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences.<br />
There are reports on Triplochiton scleroxylon provenance trials, an Elephant survey in<br />
Yankari Game Reserve, a preliminary survey offauna in a proposed Lake Chad Game Reserve<br />
andan extract speech about the Plantation Industry and its Management given at an Agricultural<br />
Society of Nigeria annual conference. To my mind the most valuable item is a paper extracted<br />
from Unasylva Vol. 22(4) No. 91 1968 on Artificial regeneration within the humid Lowland<br />
Tropical Forest by A. F. A. Lamb.<br />
N.S.S.<br />
ANNUAL REPORTS<br />
Fiftieth Annual Report of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain. 1969-70. H.M.S.O.<br />
70pnet<br />
THE FORESTRY COMMISSION has rung in its semi-centenary by producing a review in a new and a<br />
far more readable style than any ofits predecessors. The text is confined purely to the year under<br />
report without giving any commentary on the Commission's fifty years of not unremarkable<br />
achievement. (But incidentally Lord Lovat was the first Chairman of the Commissioners, not<br />
Lord Clinton as stated on page 23. The latter did not in fact succeed to that post until seven<br />
years later.)<br />
There is a little typographical confusion between the <strong>Forestry</strong> Enterprise (i.e. the State<br />
forest operations) and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Authority (Le. the government sponsored encouragement<br />
to private forestry, research and education) butthe dual role is getting clearer and some analytical<br />
editing and changing of captions should correct any confusion in future years.<br />
In the 49th Report it was stated that future expansion of State forests was expected to lie<br />
mainly in North Scotland, but in fact South Scotland is making far better progress and prospects<br />
of future land acquisition there are encouraging. Economically this will be to the good because<br />
growth potential and marketing will be better. Nevertheless, taking Britain as a whole the rate<br />
of land acquisition (34,145 acres) again fell far short of the rate of afforestation (45,727 acres).<br />
It is such a pity that there are artificial restrictions to acquisitions in England and it is high<br />
time that they should be broken down.<br />
Production and marketing continue to show healthy trends. Although there has been an<br />
80 per cent increase in average wage rates since 1960, there has been a corresponding 90 per<br />
cent increase in output per man, due of course to the introduction of more sophisticated<br />
machinery. In the same period the output of sawlogs, as comp&.red with smaller specifications,<br />
has risen from 18.3 per cent to 31.4 per cent. Pitwood now accounts for a mere 9 per cent of the<br />
total sales.<br />
The industrial staff directly employed by the Commission fell from 8,321 to 7,487 in a year,<br />
but as we are not told how many men are employed by timber merchants and contractors<br />
working in the forests and on transportation it is not possible to discuss the employment value<br />
of forestry as compared with other forms of rural land use. Rather less than half of the exploitation<br />
is by way of selling standing to the home timber trade and a very much smaller<br />
proportion ofcultural operations is conducted by contractors.
ANNUAL REPORTS 79<br />
This report gives greater space to the recreational use of the forests and the separate section<br />
dealing with the accounts shows the financial implications thereof, thus:-<br />
Thousands of £<br />
Expenditure Receipts<br />
Fishing & shooting ... ... ... ... ... 37 72<br />
Camp sites ... ... ... ... ... ... 75 66<br />
Other recreational facilities ... ... ... 255 69<br />
-- --<br />
Total ... ... 367 207<br />
-- --<br />
These figures probably include capital expenditure but the overhead expenses of £181,000<br />
seem to be an excessive proportion within the total and the greater part of that goes on the<br />
non-remunerative but very important "other recreational facilities". On the credit side it is<br />
fair to say that one hears little but the highest praise for the way the Commission is offering its<br />
countryside to the people. Town planners tend to ask whether in this over-populated island<br />
we need forests or whether they should not be turned over entirely to make recreational areas.<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission is proving in a practical way that we can have both. We certainly<br />
need both. But there is still an awful lot to be learned about the amount ofcompromise needed<br />
to strike the right balance between just wood and human satisfactions. There must be enormous<br />
variations between different parts of Britain. Here again there comes a strong argument for<br />
faster forest development in England where production and more dense recreational facilities<br />
can be fitted into juxtaposition.<br />
Private forest expansion, now very heavily weighted by the work ofinvestment organisations,<br />
has increased to some 47,000 acres, or about 10,000 acres more than the figure of 1967.<br />
G. B. RYLE.<br />
Rhodesia <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission-Fifteenth Annual Report and Accounts for the year<br />
1st July 1968 to 30th June 1969<br />
THE COMMISSION'S PRIMARY function is to grow, produce and sell Pine and Eucalypt timbers.<br />
These operations have to be run, and accounted for, on a business footing. In the year under<br />
report the Commission's trading activities covered its expenditure to the extent of £576,856,<br />
and it found in all from its own resources a total of £816,663, or 72 per cent of its expenditure<br />
overall. These amounts show an increase on those of previous years. During the year, however,<br />
useful additional finance was provided by the Government for the Commission's further trading<br />
activities. TheCommissionalso undertakes a number ofactivities"on behalfoftheGovernment"<br />
such as nlost Government forest departments would be expected to perform. For these the<br />
Commission receives grants (or rather, reimbursements) separately. The report indicates that<br />
these have not been increased to meet growing needs (but that is a very familiar story). One<br />
activity whose importance the report stresses is forestry in the Tribal Trust Lands, where the<br />
support is stated to have been very good. In the main the report indicates useful progress but<br />
no major changes from the years immediately preceding.<br />
Professional staff was increased by 2 to 19; technical staff remained at 25 with 3 more in<br />
training; increases are recorded in both clerical and accounting staffs. Other employees and<br />
labourers increased by some 140 making a total of 1,854.<br />
The area of demarcated forest remained at 2,340,193 acres. 2,232 acres were planted (2,208<br />
of them conifers), and 1,001 clear felled, making the Commission's total area of plantations<br />
39,293 acres (of which 35,201 were conifers) at the end of the year. Rhodesia incidentally is<br />
stated to have, in addition, 215,000 acres of plantations in private ownership (94,000 acres of<br />
conifers, 70,000 of Eucalypts, and 51,000 of wattle). The report does not give a picture of the<br />
tinlber economy of the country as a whole. The Commission's plantations are almost all<br />
situatedin the highlands oftheEasternconservancy, along Rhodesia's border with Mozambique.<br />
Nearly 7,000 acres were weeded, not quite 5,000 acres were thinned, nearly 6,000 acres 'Here<br />
pruned. Silviculture evidently had not been neglected.<br />
There were 54 fires in the indigenous (protected) woodlands, but despite the bad season for<br />
fires little was lost in the plantations. Indeed, the record of miles of fireguards cleared and of<br />
acres early-burned (as a protective measure) indicates that fire protection was not neglected<br />
either.<br />
Indigenous hardwood production (Baikiaea plurijuga, Guibourtia coleospema, Pterocarpus
80 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
angolensis) at 3,200,000 cubic feet was six per cent up on the previous year. Softwood produced<br />
by the Commission was 2,756,000 cubic feet, a small amount more than in the year before.<br />
Rhodesia seems to have been running into the difficulty, not unknown elsewhere of finding a<br />
market for low-grade softwood resulting from thinnings in immature plantations.<br />
The Commission's advisory and extension work was limited by lack of funds. However, in<br />
another direction "Major progress in housing staff and labour in the Eastern Conservancy is<br />
reported".<br />
The feature of the year's work of most interest to outside readers is that of the Research<br />
Branch. Or.dinarily that is made the subject of a separate report in this, the Annual Report, it<br />
has been only briefly summarised. A new Research centre was built and opened at Salisbury.<br />
With it has gone the setting up a ofa seed centre, and the rationalising of collections from seed<br />
orchards, which have started to yield appreciable amounts of seed; more seed orchards (of<br />
Pinus khasya, P.palustris, P.patula and P.elliottU) have been started. New species introduced<br />
include Arancaria hunstenii, P.patula x greggii, races of P.merkussii, P.oocarpa, P.caribaea<br />
var bahamensis and Eucaluptus deglupta. Provenance trials with seven species are mentioned,<br />
and reference is made to work on breeding material, progeny trials, increment studies and<br />
volume tables.<br />
This report, like its predecessors, simply tells one what the Commission has done, and spent,<br />
during the year. In the circumstances, its year's work is commendable. One looks forward to<br />
the time when one can read an account ofits relation to the timber economy of the country as a<br />
whole, and even, perhaps, be given the still wider view ofthe valuable role of forests and woodlands<br />
in land use all over Rhodesia.<br />
CONTRIBUTED.<br />
Annual Report of the Forest Research Institute, New' Zealand Forest Service for 1969.<br />
THE INSTITUTE IS TO BE congratulated on an impressive year's work. For your reviewer, who<br />
was closely concerned with it in its infancy, the progress in the provision of research buildings<br />
is a source of much pleasure. It is gratifying to know that the temporary structures and<br />
improvised facilities which have had to serve for over 20 years are at last being superseded.<br />
The opportunity for an exercise in public relations offered by the official opening during the<br />
year of Stage I, buildings for Forest Products research, was eagerly grasped and obtained an<br />
excellent response. Extra effort, too, has been put into dissemination of research information<br />
in other ways, but, as the Director points out, there is always room for more. The series of<br />
symposia on silvicultural problems in which commercial, State and private forestry interests<br />
participate, was continued. The theme, Land Preparation, was particularly appropriate with<br />
future very large afforestation programmes in view.<br />
As they contribute some 90 per cent of the country's timber output, major research effort<br />
was directed to the problems of the man-made forests. These are being tackled over a very<br />
wide range, from culture and handling of nursery stock to the use of new species for papers<br />
making. The tree improvement programme now includes Pseudatsuga menziesii, Pinuselliottii<br />
var el/iottii, P. taeda and P. contorta as well as P. radiata and examination for wood<br />
quality has become routine in screening plus trees and clonal material. Although Dothistroma<br />
pini has not been completely contained its initial rapid spread has slowed down and there is<br />
evidence that the vigorous empirical control measures begun a few years ago have been<br />
broadly effective.<br />
It is of interest to note that there has been a growth response in terrace rimu forests of the<br />
West Coast ofthe South Island within a few years ofharvesting about one-third of the original<br />
standing volume in selection fellings.<br />
While allowing that this report has a great deal to tell, its length is somewhat daunting.<br />
It is suggested that the highlights of groups of closely related projects concerning several<br />
research officers could sometimes be summarised.<br />
F.A.<br />
Forest Insect and Disease Survey, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service. Annual Report for the<br />
year 1969<br />
NO VERY WIDESPREAD EPIDEMICS of either insect pests or diseases occurred in Canadian forests<br />
during 1969, but some caused severe damage in various localities and others were sufficiently<br />
prevalent to give rise to anxiety.<br />
Among the insects the most important were the spruce budworm (Choristoneurafumiferana),<br />
the jack-pine budworm (C. pinu8 pinus) and the larch sawfly (Pristiphora erichsonii). There
82 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
The chapter on Plantation Management reveals that in the period of the Report 3,768<br />
morgen of State Forest and 2,593 morgen of S.A.B.T. forests were afforested bringing the<br />
total plantation areas to 267,174 morgen and 38,109 morgen respectively. Of the plantation<br />
areas no less than 90 per cent consist of conifers headed by P. elliottii closely followed by<br />
P. patula, P. radiata and P. pinaster in that order. The remaining 10 per cent is predominantly<br />
eucalypts with E. saligna predominating.<br />
The extent of plantation production of saw-logs is shown in Table 5A, a total of 38,566,433<br />
cu. ft. was produced, of this slightly over 10,000,000 cu. ft. was sawn in State sawmills with a<br />
recovery factor of49 per cent. The recovery factor from the private sector is not given. Against<br />
these figures the output of saw logs from indigenous forests was a mere 95,000 cu. ft.<br />
There is a very long chapter on Forest Research. Strength, suitability and seasoning tests<br />
for a variety of purposes were carried out on various plantation species, particularly on the<br />
species mentioned above. Tree breeding research is also very much to the fore. Space does not<br />
permit ofelaborate details, suffice to say the Department is handling a wide range ofinvestigations<br />
which must hold much of interest for those concerned with exotics in other territories.<br />
The expenditure shown against Forest Research in Form 6A is a mere R34,644, it is felt this<br />
is not a fair reflection of the activities of the Department devoted to Research.<br />
In the Chapter on Finance the total cost of running the Department and its ancillary<br />
activities is shown as R13,948,963 as against a total revenue of R12,142,805. Both figures<br />
show an increase on previous years but the gap has been reduced and the time when the<br />
Department produces a surplus should not be many years ahead.<br />
E.W.M.<br />
British Columbia Forest Service, Annual Report 1969<br />
IT IS VERY EASY to write complimentary remarks about this Report. A "glossy" production,<br />
colour photographs, easily digested format and, most important, it covers the year ending<br />
31st December 1969, yet was submitted to the Lieut-Governor in March 1970.<br />
In keeping with modern practice the Report opens with a synopsis of the year's highlights in<br />
the fornl ofthe ChiefForester's Report. A reviewer could in fact base the whole ofhis comments<br />
on this one page. To quote a few highlights: forest revenue increased by 66 per cent, pulp,<br />
paper and allied industries' production was up by 10 per cent and, the total volume of timber<br />
harvested was up by a similar 10 per cent. The situation as regards forest fires was anunfortunate<br />
one, 2318 fires burnt 407,000 acres as against a mere 34,000 acres destroyed in the previous<br />
year. Correspondingly the cost of fire fighting increased from $790,000 in 1968 to $3,700,000<br />
in 1969. During the year 25 million seedlings were planted by the Forest Service and industry,<br />
all seedlings being produced in Forest Service nurseries. Production and planting is planned<br />
to reach 75 million by 1975.<br />
Turning to the body of the report the Inventory Division shows continued progress. No<br />
less than 13 million acres of "public sustained-yield units (P.S.Y.U.)", a designation we<br />
interpret as meaning-productive forest reserves, were inventoried during the year bringing<br />
the total to date to 84,000,000 acres; it is planned to complete this work by 1975.<br />
The Research Division, again in keeping with modern trends, concentrated on Tree Improvement<br />
Studies with Douglas Fir as the chief species under investigation. On the subject of<br />
Research an interesting financial aspect shown in Appendix (145) is that expenditure on<br />
Research amounted to approximately one tenth of that incurred on silvicultural operations.<br />
Not all will agree but we consider this an ideal state of affairs in such a developed forest<br />
territory.<br />
The financial section of any annual report is always of interest; sometimes because of what<br />
it reveals, sometimes of what it conceals. This particular report shows the financial situation<br />
in two straightforward Tables (Appendices 144 and 145). According to these which are actually<br />
for the fiscal year 1968 ...69 and not for the year covered by the report, revenue amounted to<br />
$64 million as against an expenditure of $24 million, a very gratifying surplus of $40 million.<br />
One possible reason for this pleasing situation may arise from the fact that the Forest Service<br />
is not responsible for any form of recreational amenities, hunting, shooting, fishing etc.;<br />
activities which appear to take pride of place and effort in some Canadian States.<br />
The various volume statistics are all in cubic feet or board measure and not "bedevilled"<br />
by Hoppus.<br />
A most interesting and readable report.<br />
B.W.M.
ANNUAL REPORTS 85<br />
to have a high germination percentage in one week only." A new and unexpected hazard in<br />
securing natural regeneration or seed of this species!<br />
Besides the damage to seed occurring in Triplochiton this was also noted in Terminalia<br />
ivorensis (another curculionid also unidentified) and the Forest Entomology section gives a<br />
very interesting report both on these and other pests, including their predators and parasites,<br />
a very wide field which was untapped ten years ago.<br />
In the Wood Chemistry and Preservation Section I learned that Acacia nilotica occurs in<br />
Northern Ghana a fact of which I was not aware. Also that a means of getting the Daniel/ia<br />
to yield resin regularly and not at its own whim, on which I had made some unsuccessful<br />
trials in the thirties, was still insolved. The Wood Seasoning and Industries Section are testing<br />
a Solar Kiln, and are also making wood-wool slabs and testing them as a potential building<br />
material.<br />
The funds available for the Institute, NC 270,000 (1£135,000) recurrent annual expenditure<br />
and NC 85,000 (?£42,500) for development are not excessive and from the report Ghana is<br />
getting good value in research on one of her major assets.<br />
A.F.<br />
REPUBLIC OF IRELAND<br />
Report of the Minister for Lands on <strong>Forestry</strong> for the period from 1st April, 1967 to<br />
31st March, 1969.<br />
IN TWENTY-SEVFN pages of text and 12 appendices this report gives a clear picture of the work<br />
done during the two year period covered. The length of the period, presumably an economy<br />
measure, means that half of the information is only of historical interest. The 134 paragraphs<br />
are commendably short and make it easy to abstract information; while comparative tables<br />
in the text indicate trends from 1952 onwards:<br />
Planting remained fairly steady between the economy figure of20,000 acres and the restored<br />
target of 25,000 acres; and as usual the county with the highest afforestation rate was County<br />
Cork. The acquisition of suitable land is becoming progressively more difficult and a new<br />
system of valuation, based on potential timber yield, is now being used with the result that<br />
higher prices are able to be offered. By far the greater part of the land acquired was in the<br />
western counties.<br />
Of species planted, conifers comprised 95 per cent, Sitka spruce alone constituting 54 per<br />
cent. In view of the five per cent of broadleaved trees planted the establishment of plots of<br />
selected plants of birch under tree improvement schemes was obviously a special project of<br />
which details are not given.<br />
Interesting departures from normal practice in the maintenance of plantations are the use of<br />
hedges instead of fencing and a new technique by which brashing, marking, and thinning are<br />
apparently all done at the same time. Brashing is confined to selected (final crop) trees. Details<br />
are not given but it will be interesting to hear more of this method.<br />
Rabbits appear to be a pest ofminor proportions but wild goats caused damage in one forest.<br />
Deer have access to a quarter of the country's forests and these are mainly fallow. Sika are<br />
well established in Wicklow and Kerry but the indigenous red deer is fighting for survival.<br />
Control and conservation by proper management is the aim of the department.<br />
A report on timber processing and the possibility of expanding outlets was commissioned<br />
in 1966 and the report was completed in.1968. This offers little immediate prospect of improveruent<br />
in the situation and recommends that "piecemeal ad hoc industrial projects should not<br />
be encouraged".<br />
Two trends are discernible that parallel similar developments in Britain-both the numbers<br />
of men in direct employment and the length of new forest roads completed continue to fall<br />
steadily. The size of the annual budget increases with equal regularity, although the trend is<br />
reversed on some individual items. For example the cost of acquiring land has fallen with the<br />
increasing difficulty in finding suitable areas and grants to private forestry have also fallen. The<br />
reason for the latter movement is not clear as the total area planted under the grant scheme<br />
shows a rise over the same period.<br />
Publicity and public relations are obviously considered of great importance as evidenced by<br />
the expenditure on the John F. Kennedy Park ofmore than twice the combined total spent on<br />
forestry education and private forestry. The Park, an arboretum and forest garden with<br />
provision for public recreation, is a major development which attracted over 80,000 visitors<br />
during its first six months of operation. Three of the four illustrations are plates showing<br />
various aspects of the Park.<br />
J.E.G.
ANNUAL REPORTS 87<br />
on silviculture and $291,612 on research (excluding salaries of permanent staff).<br />
Despite 79,323 acres being opened for final felling, only 41,597 acres were given the<br />
first poison-gird'ling tre1atment after final felling, whilst the tacreage of exploited forests<br />
but not yet treated was recorded as 301,312 acres; this was largely due to the fears of<br />
their excision for agricultural purposes in the near future. Cleaning operations over<br />
17,804 acres of fivejten-year-old regeneration were carried out, and regenerated forests<br />
increased to 191,862 acres, of which 14,295 acres were treated during the year. Enrich<br />
Inent planting was carried out over 1,040 acres, and 311 acres of plantations created.<br />
The report records rapid progress in some sections of the Forest Research Institute<br />
\vith particular emphasis being placed on afforestation and utilisation research and the<br />
conduct of the forest resources surveys; the former being largely due to the initiation<br />
of the UNDtp assisted proje1ct on 'pilot plantafion1s of quick-growing tree species. On<br />
the other hand the report also records that the silviculture branch of the Institute<br />
"went through an even leaner year," though on the brighter side it states that a silvicultural<br />
ecologist under the Colombo Plan is expected in 1968 to undertake silvicultural<br />
research in the hill forests.<br />
West Malaysia possesses as yet no clear-cut policy on which to base a sound and<br />
realistic research programme, although indications are fairly clear as to the direction<br />
the forest policy will take. Moreover, research data on which to have a regeneration<br />
programme on the basis of the probable policy of production forestry in the foot hills<br />
and hill forest are apparently limited. Yet exploitation of the natural forest resources,<br />
including exploitation of forest land outside forest reserves and presumably of the hill<br />
forest are continuing at an increasing rate. Recent working plans drawn up by a<br />
Colombo Plan expert at Federal Government's request have not been accepted by all<br />
of the State Governments.<br />
The report follows closely the past pattern of dealing with both Federal and State<br />
interests. It is hoped that future annual reports will appear before the information is<br />
so out of date, and tha:t there may by now be a more satisfa'ctory state of affairs to<br />
record concerning the future. Otlherwise the se'cond of the UNDP Spe'cial Fund<br />
assisted projects which is required to determine both the quantitative and qualitative<br />
potential resources of the nation and to prepare a master plan co-ordinating both<br />
governmental and non-governmental bodies in developing and improving the existing<br />
forest industries, and which it was hoped would come into operation during 1968, may<br />
find itself facing an uneviable, if not impossible, task.<br />
I.W-S.
COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Forest Environments in Tropical<br />
Life Zones<br />
A Pilot Study<br />
L. R. Holdridge, W. C. Grenke, N. H. Hatheway,<br />
T. Liang and J. A. Tosi, Jr.<br />
Presents in unprecedented detail and scope through multiemulsion<br />
airphoto coverage the floristics, structure, physiognomy,<br />
and soils of a wide variety of tropical forests.<br />
The Holdridge Classification of World Life Zones is<br />
selected for trial because it is relatively advanced, has been<br />
widely applied in the American tropics (in other contexts),<br />
and has demonstrated possibilities for necessary extension<br />
and refinement.<br />
Contents: Introduction; Background of the Study; The<br />
Field' Research; Climates of the Sites; Site Description and<br />
Data; Organization and Consolidation of Ground Observations;<br />
Analyses of Aerial Photography; The End of the<br />
Beginning; Appendix I: Site Floristics; Appendix 11: A Trial<br />
Application of the Basic Life Zone System in Southeast<br />
Asia; Appendix Ill: Mega Vegetation Symbolization.<br />
780 pages including full colour maps £30.00 hard cover<br />
The Principles of Forest Yield<br />
Study<br />
E. Assmann, Institut fur Forstliche Ertragskunde, University<br />
of Munich, Germany<br />
A summary of the present state of knowledge in the field<br />
of forest yield studies. The central core of this study appertains<br />
to the research into growing space and the concept of<br />
thinning is interpreted by the author on a new basis.<br />
Contents: Foreward; Introduction; Section A. Woody growth<br />
as part of the total produce of plant societies; Soil<br />
climate and plant cover; The assimilation process from<br />
the point of view of quantitative ecology; The organic<br />
production of forest stands and its components; Ser;tion B.<br />
Tree growth and form; Section C. The constitution and<br />
development of stands; Section D. Structure, increment and<br />
yield of stands in relation to silvicultural yield; Section E.<br />
Forest organization and yield; Appendix: Hohenadls method.<br />
528 pages £ I0.00 hard cover<br />
Pergamon<br />
IIII<br />
C244
CONTENTS<br />
Loyal MessageIand Reply<br />
His Grace The Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry<br />
Chairman's Foreword ...<br />
Editorial<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association-a 50-Year Retrospect<br />
Officers of the Association<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest Authorities and Institutions ...<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of Great Britain<br />
India<br />
Pakistan<br />
Australia<br />
Canada<br />
New Zealand<br />
Northern Ireland<br />
Mrica<br />
Botswana<br />
Gambia<br />
Ghana<br />
Kenya<br />
Lesotho<br />
Malawi<br />
Nigeria<br />
Rhodesia<br />
Sierra Leone<br />
Tanzania<br />
Uganda<br />
Zambia<br />
Asia<br />
Ceylon<br />
Hong Kong<br />
West Malaysia<br />
Sabah<br />
Sarawak ...<br />
Island Territories<br />
The Bahamas<br />
British Solomon Islands Protectorate<br />
Cyprus<br />
Fiji<br />
Mauritius<br />
Seychelles<br />
West Indies<br />
British Honduras<br />
Dominica ...<br />
Grenada<br />
Guyana<br />
Jamaica<br />
St. Lucia<br />
Trinidad and Tobago<br />
Former <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Territories<br />
Palestine ...<br />
South Africa<br />
Sudan<br />
British Universities-Departments of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Oxford<br />
Aberdeen ...<br />
Bangor<br />
Edinburgh<br />
Cambridge<br />
Forest Products Research Laboratory, Princes Risborougb<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Advisers<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences<br />
Forty-Ninth Annual General Meeting<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Page<br />
89<br />
91<br />
92<br />
93<br />
94<br />
101<br />
104<br />
105<br />
108<br />
113<br />
115<br />
123<br />
130<br />
134<br />
136<br />
136<br />
136<br />
138<br />
139<br />
139<br />
141<br />
143<br />
144<br />
145<br />
147<br />
148<br />
150<br />
151<br />
151<br />
153<br />
155<br />
156<br />
156<br />
156<br />
157<br />
159<br />
159<br />
160<br />
161<br />
161<br />
162<br />
163<br />
164<br />
164<br />
166<br />
167<br />
168<br />
170<br />
172<br />
173<br />
175<br />
176<br />
178<br />
181<br />
183<br />
184<br />
188
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth If<br />
The Association's Patron<br />
8ti
LOYAL MESSAGE<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association,<br />
18 Northumberland Avenue,<br />
LONDON, W.C.2.<br />
26th March, 1971.<br />
MADAM-With humble duty and pleasure I beg to inform Your Majesty that on 16th<br />
.November, 1971, the Com'monwealth Foreistry Association, of which I h·ave the honour<br />
to be President, will attain its Golden Jubi'lee.<br />
Founded by Royal Charter as the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Association in 1921 under the<br />
patronage of His Majesty King George the Fifflh, a patronage which still continues in<br />
the person of Your Majesty, the Assodiia'tion has provided a unique link for foresters<br />
and Forest Departments. As the yea1rs pass, and in spite of changing conditions, the<br />
Assooiation and its work are proving of increasing value to the practice of forestry<br />
whether in Britain or in tropical jungles.<br />
The ho'nour confe'rred on the Association by your g,racious patronage has been an<br />
immense satisfaction to our members, and in this our GOllden Jubi'lee Year it is my<br />
pI1ivilege on their be\half to express our loyal and best wishes, and our grateful thanks<br />
to Your M,ajesty for having been our Patron since your accession to the Throne.<br />
I have the honour to be, Madam,<br />
Your Majesty's most loyal and obedient subject,<br />
President.<br />
'fhe Duke of Buccleuch, K.T.,<br />
President,<br />
The <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Associafion.<br />
Buckingham Palace.<br />
2nd April, 1971.<br />
I sincerely thank you and the members of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association<br />
for your kind and loyal message.<br />
As Patron of the Association, I congratulaJte you on the Jubilee which you are<br />
celebrating this year. I know what important and widespread work you are undertaking<br />
and send you my warmest good Wishes for the years ahead.<br />
ELIZABETH R.<br />
89
90 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
fJis Grac2 The Duke o.r Buccleuch and Queensberry.
HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH<br />
AND QUEENSBERRY, P.C., K.T., G.C.V.O.<br />
WALTER JOHN MONTAGU-DOUGLAS-SCOTT, 8th Duke of Buccleuch and 10th Duke of<br />
Queensberry, K.T., P.C., G.e.v.o., LL.D. (Hon.), took office as President of the<br />
Association in 1957.<br />
He was born on 30th December, 1894, and joined the Royal Scots just before<br />
the outbreak of war in 1914. He was almost immediately transferred to the<br />
Grenadier Guards and served with them in France throughout 1915 and 1916,<br />
commanding a company at the age of 20. He remained in France most of 1917<br />
and 1918.<br />
Since then there is scarcely a field of activity in which he has not played a<br />
prominent part and given freely of his time and energy. One' can mention only a<br />
few. He was A.D.C. to the Governor General 'of Canada in 1920; commanded the<br />
4th King's Own Scottish Borderers 1923 to 1929; he was a member of the House<br />
of Commons (as Earl of Dalkeith) from 1923-35, since when he has been an active<br />
member of the House of Lords, and became a Privy Councillor in 1937. He concerned<br />
himself too with Loca!l Government, particularly in Roxburghshire, where<br />
he spent much of his time, and was Chairman of the County Council for over 20<br />
years'l and has been Lord Lieutenant since 1932. He enjoys the freedom of the<br />
Burghs of Hawick and Selkirk.<br />
He has numerous appointments in the Royal gift. He was Lord Steward of the<br />
Household of King George VI, is Knight of the Thistle and Chancellor of the<br />
Order of the Thistle, allso Captain General of Her Majesty's Bodyguard in Scotland<br />
and Gold Stick for Scotland. He is also Lord Clerk Register for Scotland and<br />
Keeper of the Signet.<br />
He closely supervises the policy and management of large family estates in the<br />
south of Scotland and in Northamptonshire. At first his interest was mainly in<br />
farming, but later the woods claimed much more of his personal attention. During<br />
the war, in common with other woodland owners, many of his woods were felled<br />
to provide urgently needed timber.<br />
By 1939 he had become President of the Royal Scottish <strong>Forestry</strong> Society, and<br />
subsequently was much involved in negotiation with the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission and<br />
others in the evolution of the post-war forest policy, a prominent feature of which<br />
was the Dedication Scheme for woodland owners. He took opportunities to widen<br />
his knowledge and exp,erience in forestry by visits to many European countries and<br />
to Africa, where he has had frequent me'etings with numerous African political<br />
leaders. On the family properties he embarked on a very extended replanting<br />
programme, clearing and replanting poorly stocked woods and planting additional<br />
ground not suitable for farming.<br />
He has always welcomed interested visitors to his woods, and many <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
and other foresters have seen one or other of them. Older visitors will perhaps<br />
remember, for example, one of the earliest and best Sitka plantations in this<br />
country at Drumlanrig in Dumfriesshire, established long before the creation of<br />
the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, w'hich has planted so much Sitka Sp'ruce. This plantation<br />
!s now, alas, no longer in existence. In 'later years many will have seen his pioneer<br />
Ing work in the afforestation of land left derelict by iron-stone 'workings in North..<br />
amptonshire, and much else of interest as well. All will agree that the general<br />
standard of his 18,000 acres of dedicated woodlands is an example and an inspiration<br />
not only to private owners, but to foresters in general.<br />
91
CHAIRMAN'S FOREWOR·D<br />
IT IS A PLEASURE and an honour to write a foreword to this the Jubilee number of the<br />
REVIEW.<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission supported the formation of the Association very actively<br />
in 1921. For example the first two Editors of the REVIEW were on the staff of the<br />
Commission, two of the first three Chairmen were prominent <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners.<br />
Throughout the 50 years the Commission has continued to help the Association in<br />
many ways. I am particularly happy that this is still continuing under the guidance<br />
of Dr. John A. Dickson, now Director General and Deputy Chairman of the Commission,<br />
and a member of the Governing Council and Executive Committee.<br />
There is however a need of a much wider co-operation throughout the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
and it is this I would like to emphasise. There are those, it must be admitted,<br />
who have felt that the changes in the structure of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-influences<br />
such as the consistent trend towards training Forest Officers in their home territory<br />
and the formation of local forestry associations have created conditions in which the<br />
Association was unnecessary or at least unlikely to flourish. It is true we have had<br />
some difficulties to contend with but I believe the worst are over and I think this attitude<br />
is completely wrong as has been demonstrated for example in Canada and Australia<br />
where we have many of our members. I cannot believe that the young forest officer<br />
of today, wherever he may have been trained, is likely to develop such a narrow<br />
approach to his subject as to exclude from his interest the work which is going on in<br />
other territories or to be unwilling to co-operate with other foresters or timber users<br />
wherever they may be, to further their common aims.<br />
It is in this field that the Association can do so much. The need is still there, in fact<br />
in many ways I think it is greater than it was 50 years ago; and speaking for the<br />
officers and the Executive Committee of the Association I can say the determination is<br />
there. I have faith that we can and shall achieve success. We know that we have wide<br />
support from the Timber Trade. I think too, that public opinion will support us on<br />
an increasing scale. The common cry today is for Conservation of Nature and Wild<br />
Life. Who has more knowledge of or a greater part to play in this than tIle Forester?<br />
A. H. GOSLING.<br />
92
COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Vol. 50 (2), No. 144, June 1971<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
We consider it an honour and a privilege to write this Golden Jubilee Editorial<br />
as the tenth holder of ,the p,ost of Editor. In this Jubilee issue of the <strong>Review</strong> an<br />
attempt is made to outline the' history of the Association and the history of all<br />
those organisations which have contributed to forest development in the Commo'nwealth<br />
during the fifty years. The opportunity is also: taken to pay tribute to' all<br />
those who as individuals or as members of the various organisations referred to<br />
have given the Assoc1iation their unstinting support both morally and actively over<br />
the years.<br />
The various histories have of necessity to be brief-it is realised that volumes<br />
could have been, and will be, written on these histories. What has been produced<br />
is a series of thumb-nail sketches giving as wide a coverage as possible and intended<br />
more as a recognition of their place in the development of <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forestry<br />
and of the Association than as comprehensive histories.<br />
Throughout its fifty years the Association has enjoyed the sup,port of British<br />
landowners, distinguished members of the academic world, eminent members of<br />
the profession and leading members of the timb'er trade. We feel it wo'uId be<br />
invidious to, s'ingle out individuals for particular mention other than where they<br />
are mentioned in the various historical notes. It is however co'nsidered appropriate<br />
that in this issue we should, in our series of prominent <strong>Commonwealth</strong> foresters,<br />
include our President for the past fourteen years, His Grace The' Duke of<br />
BuccIeuch and Queensberry.<br />
During its fifty years the Association has accomplished a great deal. There have<br />
been those who thought the disap,p,earance of "Empire" signalled its end; later<br />
there have been those who, thought its services were no, longer necessary as more<br />
and more territories gained indep,endence. Events have sho'wn that the need for<br />
the Association as a vital link in <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forestry is today greater than<br />
ever. The Association starts 'its second fifty years confident in the kno,wledge that<br />
it is an accepted feature of <strong>Commonwealth</strong> forestry.<br />
93
THE COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION<br />
A 50-year Retrospect<br />
By PROFESSOR M. V. LAURIE<br />
IN THIS, the Golden Jubilee Year of the Association, it is of interest to look back<br />
o,ver the last 50 years to the founding of the Association, to the aims and o,bjectives<br />
laid down at that time and to see how far they have been met and how far the<br />
activities of the Association have fulfille'd the hopes and dreams of our founders.<br />
The period just after the First World War was one of tremendous activity and<br />
enlivened interest in forestry. The war experience had highlighted the dangers of<br />
an inadequate forest policy in Britain and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission was founded<br />
in order to put our domestic house in order. At the same time, a critical look was<br />
directed to the forests of the then British Empire. Standards of forest management<br />
were very variable, ranging from fairly enlighte'ned in countries such as India<br />
which had had a forest service in being for a considerable time to almost nonexistent,<br />
as in many other tropical countries. The wanton destruction of p,otentially<br />
valuable and productive forests by shifting cutivation, over-grazing and over·<br />
exploitation was widespread and was causing serious concern to, foresters. The<br />
productive potential of forests throughout the Empire as it was then had hardly<br />
begun to be develope'd, except in India, where the priority task of saving the<br />
forests from destruction 'was giving away to considerations of management for<br />
increased timber production. Research to this end was in its infancy and was quite<br />
inadequate to meet the situatio'n, but mOire important still was the' ignorance of<br />
the governments, administrators and the general public alike of the basic principles<br />
of forestry, and the almost universal lack of forest policies and forest legislation in<br />
so many of the countries concerned.<br />
It was against this background that the first British Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference<br />
was held in Lo'ndon in 1920, and one of the many valuable resolutions passed was<br />
that a <strong>Forestry</strong> Society or Association should be set up with Empire-wide interests<br />
which should unde'rtake aggressive educatio,nal work and pro'paganda so that everyone,<br />
and especially Members of Parliament and the L,egislatures throughout the<br />
different countries could app'reciate the importance of wo,od as a raw material and<br />
the dep,endence of wood supplies on forest management and afforestatio,n, and<br />
further to drive into the public consciousness the imp,ortance of forest conservatio'n<br />
throughout the 'world. The Association w'ould form a link betw'een the various<br />
forestry bodies and would mainly work through them.<br />
The moving spirit be'hind this proposal was the late C. E. Lane Poole of Australia,<br />
who died last Novemb'er and, sadly, has not lived to take part in the Jubilee<br />
cele'brations of this Association.. In discussion with a group of some half dozen<br />
eminent foresters, he drew up and presented to the' 'Co,nference the prop,osal that:<br />
1. A British Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Society should be formed to promote public interest<br />
in forestry throughout the Empire.<br />
2. Membership should consist of organisations, firms and individuals interested<br />
in forestry or the commercial utilisation of timber and forest products. The olbjective<br />
was to rop'e in eve'ryone who had an interest in forestry either directly or<br />
indirectly and curiously enough, it was envisaged that technical foresters would<br />
form a relatively small part of the membership.<br />
The objectives suggeste'd were:<br />
1. To create an interest in and to circulate information regarding forestry<br />
amongst all classes.<br />
2. To bring about better public recognition of the identity of interest between<br />
continuous timber supplies and systematic forest manageme'nt and to spread in-<br />
94
100 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
graduate course for foresters from all parts of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. In this way<br />
the memory of Sir William Schlich, as well as the presence of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Association, is kept alive throughout the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. Prizes have been<br />
given to <strong>Forestry</strong> Schools, e.g., the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association S·hield<br />
recently given to the Forester Training School at Olmatonyi in Tanzania, which<br />
was made possible through the generosity of Sir Stewart Mallinson. Also·, at the<br />
new <strong>Forestry</strong> Departmen't of the Australian National University in Can'berra,<br />
there is a room panelled and furnished in English woods for which the Association<br />
organised the collectio·n of funds and the supply of timber. In another case, the<br />
Association was a:ble to arrange finance through the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Trust, to<br />
ena·ble five members in different <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries to attend the ninth<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference in New Delhi in 1968.<br />
There are many other ways in which the Associatio'n can be useful, but in nearly<br />
all cases it has to rely on outside finance to cover any expenditure.<br />
From this brief account it will be seen that the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association<br />
has been active in meeting the objectives laid down at the time of its formation<br />
and that its impact o·n <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong>, th'ough impossi'ble to, evaluate precisely,<br />
has clearly been considerable, while at the same time ,the cost has been very<br />
lo'w. No doubt, if it had had greater financial resources, its impact would have been<br />
greater but, in retrospect, the Association has no reason to be dissatisfied with its<br />
achievements over the last 50 years.<br />
The pattern of world forestry is changing. <strong>Forestry</strong> practice is broadening from<br />
a mainly technical administration of forests concerned primarily with the production<br />
of timber and wood products to a community-oriented land use management,<br />
and the socio·-eco·nomic asp'ects of forestry are becoming more important. At the<br />
same time, many Commo·nwealth countries have become self governing and independent,<br />
and while they have lost the expertise of their former expatriate officers,<br />
they have developed their own, often highly efficient, technical and administrative<br />
staff. But they are inevitably more is·olated from one another and the need for a<br />
-body like the '<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association with its stated objectives of<br />
creating a means of communicatio,n between the various parts of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
so as to maintain the highest de'nominator of professional standards, is<br />
greater than ever.
102 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
HONORARY TREASURERS<br />
The post of Honorary Treasurer has been held by the following members:-<br />
1921-30 Sir John Stirling Maxwell (See list of Chairmen).<br />
1931-32 Sir P. H. Clutterbuck (" ,,).<br />
1932-45 Sir A. Rodger, C.B.E., ex I.F.S. and <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioner United<br />
Kingdom.<br />
1946-58 W. C. Potter, Esq., O.B.E.-A member of Messrs. Wm. Mallinson & Sons.<br />
1958-65 D. H. Rosser, Esq.-A member of the Union Trading Corporation with<br />
connections in West Africa.<br />
1966- C. G. A. Latham, Esq.-Director, Messrs. James Latham Ltd.<br />
EDITOR-SECRETARIES<br />
The posts of Editor/Secretary were originally separate: they were amalgamated in<br />
1932 and have remained so ever since. The holders of the separate posts and later of<br />
the combined post have all been retired forest officers having either <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission,<br />
Indian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service or Colonial Forest Service backgrounds.<br />
With such experience they have been ideally suited to the task of maintaining<br />
contact with overseas members, forest authorities and research and educational<br />
institutions. Their broad background of knowledge of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> is obvious<br />
from the brief notes given below on the successive holders of the posts.<br />
1921-22<br />
1922-31<br />
1931-32<br />
1921-32<br />
1932-38<br />
1938-52<br />
1952-60<br />
1961-62<br />
1965-66<br />
1966-67<br />
1968-<br />
EDITOR<br />
S. M. Edwards, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />
Professor Fraser-Storey-Lecturer, University of Wales and Education<br />
Officer, U.K. <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />
W. A. Robertson, C.M.G., F.R.G.S.-Retired Conservator of Forests,<br />
Burma. (Later Director F.P.R.L. and Colonial <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser.)<br />
SECRETARY<br />
J. S. Corbett, O.B.E.-Ret. India Forest Service.<br />
EDITOR-SECRETARY<br />
C. E. Legat, C.B.E.-Ret. Chief Conservator, South Africa.<br />
H. R. Blandford, O.B.E.-Retired Chief Conservator, Burma. (Blandford<br />
held the post for 14 years including the difficult years of the Second<br />
World War. Like so many similar bodies the Association was not put in<br />
mothballs but continued to function as usual. Of all holders of the post<br />
the Association is most indebted to Blandford not only for keeping it<br />
active during the difficult war years but for bequeathing a really viable<br />
concern to his successors.)<br />
W. MacF. Robertson-Retired C.F.S. Nigeria, C.F. Sierra Leone and<br />
C.F. Tanganyika.<br />
P. C. Lancaster, O.B.E.-Retired C.F.S. Conservator and Director of<br />
Federal Forest Research, Nigeria.<br />
F. G. Browne-Retired C.F.S. Federated Malay States, Conservator of<br />
Forests, Sabah, Director, West Africa Timber Borer Research Unit.<br />
J. J. Lawrie-Retired C.F.S., Gold Coast (Ghana) and Somaliland.<br />
E. W. March-Retired C.F.S. Ceylon, Jamaica, Nigeria, Working Plans<br />
Adviser, Malaysia.
OFFICERS OF THE ASSOCIATION 103<br />
GOVERNING COUNCIL<br />
The policy making body of the Association is the Governing Council through the<br />
medium of its own elected Executive Committee.<br />
According to the original Charter the Governing Council consists ofelected members<br />
"not exceeding forty-five in number who shall represent such parts of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
and in such numbers as the Association in General Meeting shall from time to·<br />
time determine." A reference to the list of members of the Governing Council in this<br />
number will show the wide representation by territories and interests presently sitting<br />
on Council. Every effort is made to maintain an equal balance between overseas and<br />
home-based representation and to ensure that all aspects of the forestry profession<br />
are represented.<br />
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE<br />
As mentioned above "the Governing Council shall have power to appoint a standing<br />
executive Committee, consisting of such Members of their body not exceeding twelve<br />
in number as they think fit and may delegate to such Executive Committee all or any<br />
of their powers particularly including the power to elect Members of the Association".<br />
For the sake of convenience members of the Executive Committee are selected from<br />
home-based members of the Governing Council. Here again a reference to the list of<br />
members of the Executive Committee will show the wide coverage of professional<br />
interests; forestry in Great Britain and abroad, the Timber Trade, Education and<br />
Research.<br />
LOCAL HONORARY SECRETARIES<br />
In 1923 the Executive Committee recruited various members in the Dominions and<br />
Colonies to act as local correspondents, a term which was later changed to Local<br />
Honorary Secretaries. This system continues to this day.<br />
Local Honorary Secretaries are generally senior officers of the various Forest<br />
Authorities. Their main functions have been, and still are, the recruitment of new<br />
members and the collection of subscriptions. The success of the Association overseas<br />
has to a large measure depended on the unremitting zeal with which they have carried<br />
out their duties. The latest list of Local Honorary Secretaries appears in every copy<br />
of the REVIEW.<br />
PERSONALITIES<br />
No account of the officers of the Association would be complete without reference<br />
to two outstanding characters who in their different ways did so much for the Association-Miss<br />
O'Hara and Col. W. F. Chipp.<br />
Miss O'Hara was appointed lady assistant to the Secretary shortly after its formation<br />
in 1921. She remained in the post for the next 41 years and could be said, literally, to<br />
have devoted her life to the Association, it was with considerable reluctance that she<br />
finally retired in 1962 at the advanced age of 84. Miss O'Hara was not only a built-in<br />
card index on all matters affecting the Association; she also had a wonderful memory<br />
for names and faces and never forgot a visitor however long the lapse of time.<br />
Col. W. F. Chipp, of more recent memory, was the Association's librarian for a<br />
period of 21 years. He was accorded a full length biography in the December 1970<br />
issue of the REVIEW on the occasion of his passing.
COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY AUTHORITIES AND<br />
INSTITUTIONS<br />
IN THE FOLLOWING pages brief historical accounts have been prepared covering the<br />
development of various forest authorities within the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>, and where<br />
possible, those that were in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> during the life of the Association but<br />
are so no longer.<br />
Educational and Research Institutions have been included in the territorial accounts<br />
with the exception of the United Kingdom Universities and the Forest Products<br />
Research Laboratory, Princes Risborough, which have been accorded separate<br />
histories.<br />
The length of the various histories varies and is in no way intended to reflect the<br />
importance of the territory or institution. All contributors were given an acceptable<br />
size of contribution, some followed the request to the letter, others did their best,<br />
but in quite a few cases we had to use our editorial blue-pencil prerogative. Some<br />
contributions are by Departmental Heads, some have been prepared in collaboration<br />
and again some have been heavily edited. Rather than attempt to identify individual<br />
authors the Editorial Committee decided that a list of acknowledgements due to all<br />
who have in any way contributed to the compiling of these records should appear at<br />
the end of this number.<br />
The grouping of the various territories presented some difficulty. How this has<br />
been done may be seen at a glance at the table of contents. Here again the position in<br />
the list is in no way intended to reflect the seniority or importance of any territory or<br />
institution.<br />
We are fully aware of the shortcomings of this very brief historical record and can<br />
only hope that it may one day form the frame work of a much fuller and more comprehensive<br />
history of forest development in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. No one will dispute the<br />
urgent need for such a history to be compiled before too many of the older records<br />
are lost.<br />
104
A CONDENSED mSTORY OF THE INDIAN FOREST<br />
SERVICE TO 1947*<br />
DURING THE first half of the 19th century the management of Indian and Burmese<br />
forests under the East India Company was increasingly but tentatively organised<br />
regionally to conserve valuable timber, notably teak for the British Navy, and to<br />
reduce the destruction and even erosion evident in populated tracts. Control was<br />
organised by many types of men-administrators, police, public works, army and<br />
medical officers, botanists. However excellent were the works of individuals ignorance<br />
of forestry and consequent lack of a definite policy were bound to result in poor,<br />
uneven control of timber merchants, right holders and other users of forest produce.<br />
Eventually in 1856 the Governor-General, Lord Dalhousie, appointed a trained<br />
German forest officer, Dr. (later Sir) Dietrich Brandis, to the charge of the Burmese<br />
forests. In 1857 after the Mutiny and the demise of the East India Company, the<br />
British Government, through the Secretary of State for India, became directly respon- .<br />
sible for the rule and welfare of India. Reforms included a great expansion of public<br />
works, roads and railways. The great demand for wood, particularly sleepers and wood<br />
fuel for the railways, accelerated commercial exploitation and the continued destruction<br />
of forests by shifting cultivation, grazing and fire.<br />
It became clear and was accepted that a separate forest department was needed.<br />
Then Lord Elgin's Despatch of 1862, approved by Sir Charles Wood, the Secretary of<br />
State, outlined inter alia the principles essential to forest policy and management,<br />
namely<br />
(i) Personal interests were incompatible with public interests in the working of<br />
forests.<br />
(H) Government forests should be set apart in a strictly formal manner, be marked<br />
with boundaries and made unalienable preferably with rights extinguished on<br />
equitable terms.<br />
(iii) The forests would thereby be removed from the category of waste lands to<br />
become a special State Domain.<br />
Accordingly in 1863 Brandis was appointed Inspector General of Forests. Then, as<br />
proposed in the Despatch of 1862, the Indian Forest Act (VII of 1865) was passed. That<br />
Act was replaced by the greatly improved Act VII of 1878 which was replaced by Act<br />
XVI of 1927 with only small changes. The objects and effects of those Acts were not<br />
merely to incorporate provisions and penalties for offences against the forest (offences<br />
generally included in other legislation), but to outline the new forest policy and to<br />
force attention on and ensure respect for the new forest estate created under a clear<br />
legal procedure. The Acts also emphasised the authority of the forest personnel who<br />
were provided with some special powers to support their unpopular work distant from<br />
the Courts and centres of police.<br />
Establishment of the Service. The stage was set to establish the Imperial (later called<br />
Indian) Forest Service. In 1866 Brandis had appointed two German forest officers,<br />
Dr. (later Sir) William Schlich and B. Ribbentrop. In 1868 the Secretary of State made<br />
rules, effective from 1869, for the new service. It was to contain 57 officers, namely<br />
7 Conservators (in 4 classes), 14 Deputy Conservators (3 grades) and 36 Assistant<br />
Conservators (3 grades). Pay was by grade and class starting at Rs. 250 (nearly £20)<br />
a month rising to Rs. 1600 for a first class Conservator. Promotion to classes and<br />
grades was by merit. All the offices were open without distinction to Europeans and<br />
Indians. Appointments could only be made by the Secretary of State or Governor<br />
General in Council. To incorporate selected officers already employed initial appoint-<br />
*Note. This article depends largely on the 4 vols. of Stebbing's The Forests of India. Geographical<br />
and political names are those used until 1947. For lack of space the author has had<br />
to ignore local differences in development and procedure (e.g. in Burma and Madras Presidency),<br />
many activities and problems (e.g. grazing and shifting cultivation outside Reserves) and to<br />
neglect outstanding work of many individuals (e.g. of Dr. Cleghorn).<br />
108
A CONDENSED HISTORY OF THE INDIAN FOREST SERVICE 109<br />
ments to the higher classes and grades were permitted. The Government ofIndia could<br />
transfer officers from one Province to another. The foundations ofan All-India service<br />
of officers were laid.<br />
New recruits were to be trained for 2 years at a school of forestry in France or<br />
Germany, there being no school in Britain. Accordingly 7 probationers, including<br />
F. R. Dasai, an Indian, were trained and appointed in 1869. By 188695 men had been<br />
so trained and appointed. From 1887 the men appointed were trained in England at<br />
Cooper's Hill opened in 1885 under Schlich on secondment from India. The school<br />
moved to Oxford in 1905 and from 1907 all appointments were Oxford men until 1913<br />
when Cambridge and, from 1915, Edinburgh also contributed. From 1928 men trained<br />
in India at the I.F.S. College, Dehra Dun (opened in 1926) were also appointed.<br />
The sanctioned strength was progressively increased as Provinces and forest charges<br />
were subdivided and work and research expanded until in 1923 it was 399 (43 Conservators<br />
and higher). The incremental pay based on length of service began at Rs. 375 a<br />
month. The numbers included promotions from the Provincial Forest Services (founded<br />
in 1891 and trained at Dehra Dun), promotions which from 1923 had to be 121 per<br />
cent of the directly recruited strength. By 1919 only 5 Indians had been directly<br />
appointed but from 1921, after the 1919 Reforms, 40 per cent of the vacancies were<br />
to be filled by Indians (for Burma 25 per cent by Burmans) if they had the requisite<br />
qualifications. Indianisation was rapid until the prospect of new reforms stopped all<br />
recruitment after 1932. In total there had been 580 men directly recruited since 1866.<br />
Achievements of the Service. For the first 30 years the primary work was to select,<br />
demarcate.after legal settlement and then map the forest domain. The boundaries<br />
were cleared, marked with numbered pillars, the lines traversed and their lengths and<br />
angles recorded and legally registered. By 1900 93,068 miles (out of 141,204 needed)<br />
had been artificially demarcated. To hasten map-making to Survey of India standards<br />
a Forest Survey Branch was formed in 1872. By 1890, when the Survey of India could<br />
fully take over, the Branch had surveyed 22,641 sq. miles of forests and the Survey<br />
of India 23,518 sq. miles, mainly at 4in. to 1 mile.<br />
All those and other works were accomplished on foot or horseback, by bullock<br />
cart or elephant, in mostly remote, hilly terrain without proper communications. Long<br />
periods of arduous physical work in camp for weeks or months at a time in tents or<br />
grass huts, exposed to weather and malaria (whose origin was unknown until 1880)<br />
resulted in heavy casualties. Of the 132 men directly recruited by 1890 33 (25 per cent)<br />
died in service. The men recruited to 1900 fared hardly better. One cantiot but salute<br />
those pioneers and their devotion to duty and understand the lasting spirit of service<br />
and esprit de corps that they inspired under the I.F.S. motto meliora speramus.<br />
Working Plans. A noted accomplishment was the use of published working plans.<br />
Their preliminary was Brandis's linear surveys and regulated yields in Burma. In 1884<br />
as Inspector General Schlich formed a Working Plans Branch under the Government<br />
of India to centralise the sanction and control of all plans. All plans had to prescribe<br />
the use of control forms sent annually to the Branch showing deviations from prescriptions<br />
for sanction. That principle of sanction and control by high authority both<br />
ofprescriptions and deviations (and therefore application)ofplans wasneverabandoned<br />
although by 1920 control had descended to Provincial governments as they developed<br />
their own working plan branches. Consequently the forests progressively reached a high<br />
degree of orderly, stable management.<br />
Early plans were simple and extensive but developed steadily in scope and intensity<br />
of silviculture and utilisation as growing stocks, knowledge, markets, communications<br />
and transport improved. By 1947 out of 111,526 sq. miles of demarcated forest 90 per<br />
cent were under plans.<br />
Exploitation. Except for increased departmental operations after 1920, mainly in<br />
Madras and the Andamans, the policy was to use timber merchants for felling, extractjng<br />
and marketing trees selected and marked by the department. Except in big forests,<br />
as in Burma, where the tonnage ofmarketable timber per acre was low, and in bamboo
110 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
forests (as in Orissa in 1927) to introduce their use for paper, inspired by Dehra Dun<br />
research, leases were progressively discouraged in favour of annual lump-sum sales of<br />
marked standing timber by auction or tender of comparatively small lots. The consequent<br />
encouragement of small, often local merchants and the steadily improving<br />
roads and markets resulted in good competition, better utilisation and higher revenues<br />
but required more supervision. Sales by royalty on outturn, which discourage good<br />
utilisation, were made only where costs of exploitation or profits were uncertain.<br />
Hand-sawing at stump and extraction by bullock carts and roads, by slides, ropeways,<br />
flumes and pack transport in the Himalayas and logs by elephant and water in Burma<br />
remained the basic means of exploitation. After 1920 the development of the motor<br />
car and lorry accelerated road improvement. Advances were in step with circumstance<br />
except, from 1920-30, the premature use of American mechanical methods before<br />
markets for less valuable species were assured although locally relatively small sawmills<br />
and tramways had success.<br />
Silviculture. In early days an impoverished growing stock demanded rest, fire<br />
protection, cyclic selective removal of mature, dead and unwanted trees, climber<br />
cutting and dependence on natural regeneration. Those slow, tedious, unspectacular<br />
methods were progressively very effective unless or until site conditions progressed<br />
to favour unduly less valuable and shrubby species.<br />
From about 1905, as crops and knowledge improved, uniform shelterwood methods<br />
were introduced for more gregarious species. Plantations of indigenous species,<br />
especially teak, often by taungya methods and mainly in damper sites, as in Bengal<br />
after 1920, were also made. Few exotics except eucalypts in Madras were used. Natural<br />
regeneration, coppice and the continued use of cyclic selective felling and culture<br />
remained the basis of an intensifying silviculture in which thinnings became a feature<br />
after 1925. By 1930 successful protection had produced serious problems wherever<br />
progression towards a climax discouraged the wanted species. But the wish to retain<br />
indigenous forest and fashion it with biotic controls and culture persisted. Much<br />
study and many trials resulted, thereby delaying perhaps unduly more expensive<br />
outlays on artificial planting of exotic and native species.<br />
Meanwhile great progress was made in the construction and use of yield, stand and<br />
volume tables, in research techniques and in improving cultural management.<br />
Learning and Education. A primary and continuous task was to learn the secrets of<br />
Indian silviculture and teach them and managerial practices to junior personnel. In<br />
1875 the Indian Forester was founded to record and exchange information on all<br />
aspects of forest life and work. The journal has, without official support, been published<br />
regularly ever since. In 1901 S. Eardley Wilmot initiated central research at<br />
Dehra Dun (see separate article) by appointing E. P. Stebbing as Entomologist.<br />
- In 1878 the Forest Ranger College was founded at Dehra Dun, supplemented by<br />
schools at Coimbatore in 1912 and at Pyinmana in 1910. Schools for foresters and<br />
forest guards were formed later by Provincial Governments at various times. In 1891<br />
a school for Provincial Service officers was established at Dehra Dun for officers<br />
junior to the 1.F.S. to train Indians unqualified, unwilling or unable to be trained for<br />
the I.F.S. in Europe. It closed when the I.F.S. College was founded at Dehra Dun in<br />
1926. The progress of Indian forestry has owed much to the pupils of those several<br />
schools.<br />
Major literature (apart from many departmental manuals and innumerable Dehra<br />
Dun research publications) included Indian Forest Trees (D. Brandis), A Manual of<br />
Indian Timbers (J. S. Gamble), Silviculture of Indian Trees, 3 vols. (R. S. Troup),<br />
The Forests ofIndia, 3 vols. by E. P. Stebbing and 1 vol. edited by Sir Harry Champion<br />
and F. C. Osmaston, several floras e.g. of Chota Nagpur (H. H. Haines), ofthe Punjab<br />
(R. N. Parker) and of Kumaun (A. E. Osmaston) and Forest Types of India (H. G.<br />
Champion).<br />
Conclusion. Serving, seconded and retired I.F.S. officers also influenced forestry<br />
outside Burma, Pakistan and India, e.g. in advice to or membership of the Colonial
A CONDENSED HISTORY OF THE INDIAN FOREST SERVICE 111<br />
and Home forest services and in providingsix professorsandseveral lecturers offorestry<br />
in Britain. Their real achievement was to enrich a dilapidated growing stock and build<br />
in an unexplored forest environment a stable forest estate, soundly developed and<br />
rnanaged for a great potential and to hand it over in 1947 to Burma, India and Pakistan<br />
complete with schools of forestry, research centres and a forest staff able and eager<br />
to continue the work.<br />
INDIAN FORESTRY SINCE INDEPENDENCE<br />
The state of India's forests at the time the country attained Independence was far<br />
from satisfactory. Reserved forests had perforce been overworked during the war. Prices<br />
vvere high and were tempting the owners of private and zamindari forests to cash in on<br />
what timber was saleable, particularly in view ofthe pending abolition ofthe zamindari<br />
system of land tenure. At the same time industrial development was accelerating and<br />
the needs of the wood-using industries for raw material were becoming far in excess of<br />
available supplies. There was ever greater pressure on forest land for agriculture to<br />
feed the rapidly increasing population, and much forest land was lost in this way just<br />
after Independence in 1947. Something had to be done urgently, to reverse these<br />
trends.<br />
Firstly a new Forest Policy was drawn up and promulgated in 1952. It replaced the<br />
Forest Policy of 1894 which, though it had served its purpose well in the past, was<br />
inadequate for the changed conditions. The main new features were a target of 331 per<br />
cent of the land to be under forest instead of the current 22 per cent which was tending<br />
to diminish. The distribution of the forest area was to be flexible being higher in some<br />
States anc1lower in others. Forests were to be classified according to the major functions<br />
for which they were to be managed. Production forests were to be managed not<br />
merely on a sustained yield but where possible on an increasing yield. (The average<br />
rate of production over the country as a whole was very Iow and the potentialities for<br />
increase tremendous.) There was to be an aggressive policy of replacing inferior tree<br />
growth with productive plantations, better regulation of grazing, conservation of wild<br />
life, the creation of "Treelands" around villages and many other activities.<br />
With the abolition of the Zamindaris and the disinheritance of the Rajahs, very<br />
large additional areas of forest land, mostly seriously degraded, were taken over by<br />
the State Governments. India is now in the almost unique position of having 96 per<br />
cent of the forest area under Government control. This has needed a great increase in<br />
forest staff at all levels to protect, administer and manage the additional area. The<br />
training of this extra staff has put a great load on the Colleges both for Rangers and<br />
for the higher officer grades.<br />
To implement the new Forest Policy a series of five-year Development Plans has<br />
been introduced under which, among other things, large plantation schemes have been<br />
carried out in the various States. The first of these Plans (1951-56) was a relatively<br />
modest effort, but as the organisation was built up, the later plans have produced ever<br />
increasing results, some of which are very impressive. A feature of many of the new<br />
plantation areas is the high proportion of fast-growing Eucalypts used, primarily a<br />
variety of E. tereticornis called the "Mysore hybrid". To give an idea of the scale of<br />
operations, in 1966 in Uttar Pradesh State alone, the annual area ofspecial plantations<br />
lnade was about 10,000 acres (4,000 hectares) and has no doubt increased considerably<br />
since. Normal taungya is used where practicable, but where cultivators cannot be<br />
found, Departmental taungya is done. There are many other activities under the fiveyear<br />
plans-pre-investment surveys of forest resources, extraction and exploitation<br />
schemes, anti-erosion measures, formation of wild-life conservation areas, national<br />
parks and even the establishment of zoos, to mention only a few.<br />
In all a very determined and impressive effort is being made to rehabilitate the<br />
forests of India.<br />
An incidental matter of some interest is that the Indian Forest Service, which<br />
disappeared as such after Independence, all its members being absorbed into the State
112 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Forest Services with their varying rates of pay and prospects, has very recently been<br />
resuscitated in a slightly different form. Men from all the States of high ability are<br />
selected for it, and get improved prospects and conditions of service.<br />
THE FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND COLLEGES, DEHRA DUN<br />
Soon after the formation of the Indian Forest Service in 1869, the need for properly<br />
trained technical supervisory staff became acute and, to meet this need, the Forest<br />
Ranger College was founded at Dehra Dun in 1878. It was, incidentally, the first<br />
forestry school in the British Empire. It was supplemented later by Ranger Schools at<br />
Pyinmana (Burma) in 1910 and Coimbatore (Madras) in 1912. In 1891, a school for<br />
Provincial Service Officers was added at Dehra Dun to give higher training up to<br />
Sub-Assistant Conservator level but this disappeared shortly after the Indian Forest<br />
College was formed in 1926 to take over the training of I.F.S. Officers who had, up<br />
till then, been educated in Europe and the U.K.<br />
The Forest Research Institute at Dehra Dun was established in 1906. Starting on a<br />
modest scale with six research branches it grew steadily and in 1929 moved to its<br />
present imposing buildings on a 450 hectare estate west of the town. More recently<br />
the Ranger College and the Indian Forest College have moved to new buildings on<br />
the same estate.<br />
The Research Institute and Colleges are under the jurisdiction of the President,<br />
who is assisted by four Directors each of whom looks after a number of Branches.<br />
They are: 1, Director of Forest Products Research (Branches: Seasoning, Timber<br />
Engineering, Timber Mechanics, Composite Wood, Cellulose and Paper, Chemistry<br />
of Forest Products); 2, Director of Biological Research (Branches: Minor Forest<br />
Products, Systematic Botany, Genetics, Entomology, Pathology, Wood Anatomy and<br />
Wood Preservation); 3, Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research (Branches: Silviculture, Logging,<br />
·Wood Working including Sawmilling and Finishing); 4, Director of Forest<br />
Education (Indian Forest College, Northern Ranger College, Southern Ranger<br />
College, Editorial Board and Statistical Branch). There is also a Publicity and Liaison<br />
Branch working direct to the President.<br />
There are Branch Research Stations at Bangalore in Mysore and at Coimbatore in<br />
Madras, and a new Research Centre at Jabalpur in Madhya Pradesh to tackle regional<br />
problems.<br />
The Research Organisation as a whole is equipped to tackle almost any problems<br />
likely to arise in the fields of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Wood Utilisation. Apart from the routine<br />
collection ofcomprehensive data on the strength, seasoning, peeling, durability, woodworking<br />
and pulping properties of hundreds of species, many of them have been<br />
tested for special purposes such as match-making, pencils, plywood, etc., and a<br />
number of industries have depended on these results. An important early discovery<br />
was that high class papers could be manufactured from bamboo which today forms<br />
70 per cent ofthe raw material used by the Indian Paper industry. Recently the Timber<br />
Engineering Branch has developed techniques for using unconventional timbers for<br />
building structures.<br />
In Silviculture, progress has been continuous. The Silviculturist has acted largely in<br />
liaison with State Silviculturists and is a centre for the collection and dissemination<br />
of information. Statistics of growth and yield are collected by him and processed<br />
in the Statistical Branch. Forest Genetics is a recent introduction and it may be some<br />
years before the effects of tree-breeding show up in the field.<br />
In the Education Directorate apart from running the I.F.S. and Ranger courses,<br />
some eight different technical courses are available and technical training facilities<br />
for apprentices from wood-using industries are provided.
114 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Genetics, Forest Economics, Range Management, Forest Botany, Soil and Wood<br />
Chemistry, Forest Entomology and Medicinal Plants. Its Forest College imparts<br />
education to Forest Officers of both wings and Forest Rangers of the Western wing.<br />
Transfer of Management of "guzara" Forests to the Forest Department<br />
Since 1950, the Government of the North West Frontier Province have transferred<br />
to the Forest Department the management of about 1800 square miles of forests<br />
owned by village communities.<br />
Irrigated Plantations<br />
About 70,000 acres of new irrigated forest plantations have been created since<br />
independence in the Punjab and Sind. This includes the compact and linear plantations<br />
in the ThaI, which greatly facilitated the reclamation of this desert area into canal<br />
irrigated colonies.<br />
Soil Conse"ation<br />
The Forest Department started Soil Conservation work in pre-partition India and<br />
in the Punjab a Soil Conservation Circle was organised in 1939. Since 1954 the scope<br />
of work was greatly increased with assistance from I.C.A. of V.S.A. Recently a<br />
Directorate of Soil Conservation has been constituted under the Agriculture Department<br />
to carry out this work because ofits increasing stress on agronomical practices.<br />
Introduction of Fast Growing Exotic Species<br />
The work of introduction of exotic tree species has a long history in this area.<br />
Since independence, the emphasis in the Western wing has been on the introduction<br />
ofEucalyptus and hybrid poplars. The work has so far been largely on an experimental<br />
scale. Large plantations with Eucalyptus species have recently been started.<br />
Development of the Concept of Range Management<br />
Since 1954 introduction of Range Management has been started in pilot project<br />
areas spread all over the Western wing. The Forest Departments of the Punjab,<br />
Sind and Baluchistan now administer about 12 million acres of rangelands.<br />
Arousing National Interest in Watershed Management<br />
With the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty with India in 1960, the prosperity<br />
of the Western wing has come to depend very greatly on the efficient functioning of<br />
the giant Mangla and Tarbela reservoirs. At the present rate ofsiltation these reservoirs<br />
are likely to get silted up in 40-80 years. Since 1960 the Forest Departments have<br />
started surveying the problem and laying out pilot projects to demonstrate correct<br />
land use practices for the watersheds. In 1968 the President of Pakistan inaugurated<br />
the First West Pakistan Watershed Management Conference held at the Pakistan<br />
Forest Institute, Peshawar.<br />
Tree Planting along the Canals and Roads<br />
During the past decade, the Forest Departments of the Western wing have been<br />
responsible for raising plantations along the roads and canals.<br />
Transfer of Management of Forests of the Former Princely States<br />
About 1,700 square miles of temperate coniferous forests in the former princely<br />
States of Dir, Swat and Chitral have recently been transferred to the North West<br />
Frontier Province Forest Department. The crucially important and difficult task of<br />
settlement ofrights and demarcation ofGovernment owned forests has still to be done.<br />
Wildlife Management and Outdoor Recreation<br />
The Forest Department in the Western wing has been made responsible for managing<br />
wildlife. The Pakistan Wildlife Enquiry Committee is deliberating on how best<br />
to ensure the conservation and development ofwildlife in Pakistan.
116 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
a committee of management. In this way the C'ommission' has become involved in<br />
recreational ski-ing areas. ' , ,<br />
In 1964 the Forests Act was amended to provide financial assistance by way of<br />
interest free loans for 12 years to land holders for the growing of softwoods.<br />
Queensland<br />
In 1906 a State Forests and National Parks Act provided for permanent forest<br />
reservations alienable only by Act of Parliament, and regulations in 1914 vested<br />
control in a Director of Forests. Amendments to the Act in 1924 constituted a<br />
Provisional <strong>Forestry</strong> Board, which was subseque'ntly abolished in 1932 and a<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Board created. In the same year, under the Prickly Pear Land and<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Administration Act 1932, the Land Administration Board was construed<br />
as the <strong>Forestry</strong> Board and the forest service became a Sub-Department of the<br />
Lands Department.<br />
This arrangement continued until 1957 when a short <strong>Forestry</strong> Act constituted<br />
the service as a separate Department under the control of a Director of Forests.<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> Act 1959 brought the legislation more into line with that of other<br />
States, with one exception, viz. that the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department is responsible for<br />
the management and protection of National Parks. At this time also the title of<br />
the chief officer was changed to Conservator of Forests.<br />
The following categories of reservation now obtain:<br />
(a) National Parks, and<br />
(b) State Forests<br />
alienable only by resolution of the Legislative Assembly.<br />
(c) Timber Reserves, alienable upon the recommendation of the Conservator of<br />
Forests by the Governor in Council.<br />
The activities of the Department are financed from annual appropriations by<br />
Parliament.<br />
Westem Australia<br />
The forests of Western Australia were administered by regulations under the<br />
Crown Land Act 1898 until 1918 when a comprehensive Forests Act created a<br />
Department of Forests, headed by a Conservator and responsible to the Minister<br />
for Forests. This situation, subject to amendment and consolidation of the Act in<br />
1954, obtains to the present day.<br />
The Conservator, who is recognised as a body corporate, is appointed for a term<br />
of seven years. He and all officers of the professional division of the Department<br />
must be professionally qualified. Internal training and examinations are established<br />
for officers of a general division.<br />
Two categories of land for forestry purposes exist; State forests, alienable only<br />
by resolution of both Houses of Parliament; and timber reserves, alienable by<br />
Order of the Governor in Council but subject to' the approval of the Conservator.<br />
The latter may, in addition, manage forests on catchment areas controlled by<br />
other authorities.<br />
South Australia<br />
South Australia was poorly endo,wed with native forests, and it is not surprising<br />
that conservation and afforestation measures commenced at an early date in the<br />
development of the State. A Forest Trees Act was passed in 1873 followed by a<br />
Forest Board Act in 1875. In 1882 an amending Act abolished the Board and a<br />
year later regulations under the Woods and Forests Act create'd a Department of<br />
Woods and Forests under the control of a Conservator. This situation continued<br />
until, the <strong>Forestry</strong> Act 1950..1956 which vested control in the Minister of Forests<br />
who delegates his administrative po'wers to the Conservator.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 117<br />
In addition, the Governor appoints a <strong>Forestry</strong> Board of which the Conservator<br />
of Forests is an ex-officio member. The Board makes recommendations to the<br />
Minister on forest reserves, sawmills and the sa1e of forest products.<br />
Forest reserves are dedicated under the Crown Lands Act 1929-1960 and<br />
alienated by proclamation. The operation of forest reserves by municipal and<br />
district councils is provide'd for by the Local Government (<strong>Forestry</strong> Reserves) Act<br />
1944, subject of course to the supervision of the Conservator.<br />
Tasmania<br />
An Act passed in 1885 provided for the appointment of a Conservator of Forests,<br />
but until 1920 administration was effected through the Lands Department.<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> Act 1920 created a <strong>Forestry</strong> Department but by amending legislation<br />
in 1946 the department became a <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission headed by a Chief<br />
CommIssioner and two Assistant Commissioners, a situation which has obtained<br />
up to the present time. The' Act was up-dated in 1954, 1957, 1959 and 1961.<br />
Categories of forest reservation are State Forests, alienable only by resolution<br />
of both Houses of Parliament; and Timber Reserves alienable by the Governor<br />
on the recommendation of the Secretary for Lands, but subject to a report from<br />
the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission.<br />
The establishment of industries producing newsprint, fine writing and printing<br />
papers, etc., followed the successful development of techniques to produce pulp<br />
and paper from eucalypts.<br />
COMMONWEALTH FOREST SERVICES<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau<br />
Originally established as the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau in 1925 and linked<br />
to a federal department which preceded the Department of the Interior, the Bureau<br />
was provided for by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau Act 1930 which created an Inspector<br />
General of Forests, a <strong>Forestry</strong> Fund, and defined its powers and functions.<br />
In 1946 an amending Act changed the titles to <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau and<br />
Director-General respectively, as well as increasing the Bureau's functions to<br />
encompass matters which had become necessary through the operation of Timber<br />
(;ontrol during the second world war.<br />
Mr. C. E. Lane-Poole, formerly <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser, who pioneered<br />
the formation of the Bureau, became the first Inspector..General, and retired in<br />
1944. Mr. G. 1. Rodger, at that time Conservator in South Australia, was appointed<br />
Ilirector-General in 1946.<br />
One of the functions of the Bureau was to establish experimental stations, and<br />
the first of these was established at Mt. Burr in South Australia in 1938. Additional<br />
stations have been established over the years and the sixth will be completed in<br />
January 1971 in North Queensland.<br />
The role of the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau has been essentially a co-ordinating<br />
one in a federation of States with autonomous forest services and individual<br />
forestry Acts. In addition it has had responsibility for higher forestry education<br />
(the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School) advised by a Board, and for research both at<br />
headquarters in Canberra and in the co-operative research stations in the various<br />
States.<br />
A milestone in its history occurred in 1961 when Federal Cabinet decided to<br />
create a Forest Research Institute within the Bureau and to establish an AustraI'ian<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Council. The organisation of these two bodies did not come to fruition<br />
until 1964 at which time the Bureau was transferre'd to the Department of National<br />
Develop,ment, leaving the A.C.T. Forests with the Department of the Interior and<br />
foreshadowing the transfer of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> S'chool to the Australian<br />
National University.<br />
In 1961 the Federal Cabinet established the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> Council consist-
118 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
ing of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Ministers for National Development (Chairman),<br />
Interior and External Territories, together with the State Ministers responsible for<br />
forestry. It is supported by a Standing Committee comprising the Heads of State<br />
Forest Services; the Chief, Division of Forest Products, C.S.I.R.O.; representatives<br />
of Interior and External Territories; with the Director-General of the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
'and Timber Bureau as Chairman.<br />
The Council has responsibility for formulating forest policy and one of its first<br />
acts was to recommend an increased 1evel of softwood planting, to be financed by<br />
the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>. This resulted in the Softwood <strong>Forestry</strong> Agreements Act 1967<br />
which provided for financial assistance for planting beyond a base rate by way of<br />
loans interest-free for a period of ten years. The objective was to increase the<br />
total planting to a rate of 75,000 acres per year.<br />
After a considerable period as Principal of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School Dr.<br />
M. R. Jacobs became Director-General of the Bureau in 1960 and continued in<br />
that position until his retirement in 1970.<br />
Australian Capital Tenitory<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> in the A.C.T. has been the responsibility of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Government<br />
through the Department of the Interior and its predecessors. Under the latest<br />
reorganisation responsibility is vested in the Forest Branch of the A.C.T. Lands<br />
Division of the Department of the Interior.<br />
Mr. G. J. R'odger was apppointed Chief Forester of the Federal Capital Commission<br />
in 1926 and implemented a programme of planting with a target of 20,000<br />
acres. Rodger was followed by M. R. Jacobs, both of whom were subsequently to<br />
become Director-General of the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau.<br />
The A.C.T. Forests Section was then heade'd by Mr. C. R. Cole from 1929-1958<br />
during which time utilisation of the forests commenced and continued to expand.<br />
In 1950 the Section became a Division of the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau, but<br />
when the Bureau was transferred to the Department of National Development in<br />
1964 it remained with the Department of the Interior and is now the Forests Branch<br />
of the A.C.T. Lands Division of the department. The Director is Mr. M. W.<br />
Edgerley.<br />
During the current year, with a total plantation area exceeding 30,000 acres,<br />
the Branch negotiated an integrated industry agreement with a consortium to cut<br />
50 million super feet annually for sawn timber, plywood and wood chips.<br />
Northem Tenitory<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau stationed an officer at Darwin from 1950<br />
1958 to make a reconnaissance of the resources of the Northern Territory and<br />
activate a small forestry programme. In 1958 the Northern Territory Administration<br />
requested the Bureau to inaugurate a programme of research, and later an<br />
operational programme with one of its objects the appropriate employment of<br />
aboriginals. It was understood that after a suitable period the "state" type functions<br />
would be handed over to the Northern Territory Administration.<br />
Two prime aspects were followed, viz. the development of a technique for<br />
afforestation with cypress pine, and the introduction of exotics (both dicotyledons<br />
and pines) from tropical monsoon areas.<br />
The transfer of operational responsibilities from the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber<br />
Bureau to a newly-created <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch of the Northern Territory Administration<br />
took place on 1st July, 1967, leaving the research activities to form the nucleus<br />
of the Northern Regional Station.<br />
Tenitory of Papua/New Guinea<br />
The first forestry legislation for Papua was the Timber Ordinance (Consolidated)<br />
1909. Mr. C. E. Lane-Poole, as <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser, made a recon··
122 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Australian National University<br />
The dissatisfaction in academic circles with the somewhat loose arrangement<br />
between State Universities and the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School eventually led to<br />
the establishment of a Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> within the Faculty of Science,<br />
School of General Studies, Australian National University.<br />
Professor J. D. Ovington was appointed to the foundation chair of <strong>Forestry</strong> in<br />
1965 and the Department remained on the site of the Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> School<br />
at Yarralumla until its permanent buildings were erected on the University campus.<br />
The new buildings were opened by H.R.H. the Duke of Edinburgh in 1968 and<br />
feature timbers donated by governments and industry throughout the British<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong>.<br />
The Department provides a four-year bachelor course (including honours) based<br />
on a semester system. Full facilities for post-graduate training at M.Sc. and Ph.D.<br />
levels are available and actively pursued. About 50 students take their basic degree<br />
each year 'including about 10 % from overseas countries.<br />
Active research programmes are conducted by the academic staff.
124 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
made in 1929, and most provinces have now completed several inventories of<br />
increas'ing intensity. Tree planting on the Prairies began as early as 1875, and now<br />
most provinces have planting programmes that are lof a size proportionate to their<br />
wo-odland activities. Slash disposal is o'ne of the earliest forms of silviculture<br />
practiced, but mainly, it must be admitted, for the purp-ose of re-ducing fire- hazard.<br />
The major silvicultural practice no-w is in site preparations for seeding or planting.<br />
The pulp and paper industry began in the late 1800's. There were: mills in most<br />
eastern provinces by the year 1900, with the first mill in B-ritish Columbia starting<br />
production in 1909. Production in Manitoba did not start until 1927, followed by<br />
Albert and Saskatchewan in 1957 and 1968.<br />
The British North America Act of 1867 was a major e:vent in the management<br />
of natural resources as well as in Canadian history. It gave their control to the<br />
provinces then existing 9 but the federal government retained control of the natural<br />
reso-urces in the pro,vinces of Manitoba, Saskatc'hewan and Alb-erta w'hen they<br />
were formed. It was not until 1930 that these provinces gained control of their<br />
forest resources. .<br />
The present Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service has evolved from the jo'ining in 1960<br />
of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch of the Department of Northern Affairs and National<br />
Resources and the Forest Biology Division of the Department of Agriculture to<br />
form the Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>. This became <strong>Forestry</strong> and Rural Development<br />
in 1966, and in 1968 the forestry elements joined the new Department of Fisheries<br />
and <strong>Forestry</strong> as the Fo'restry Branch, renamed the Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service<br />
in 1969.<br />
The old <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch began in 1899 with the appointment of a Chief<br />
Inspector of Forests. Its chief duties were to look after tree planting in the<br />
Prairie provinces and fire protection in the forest reserves of these provinces,<br />
along with the' Railway Belt in British Columbia. In 1905 the Branch began<br />
administering timber of lands outside the forest reserves, and for three years<br />
following 1908 it also administered the National Parks. The first major step toward<br />
a research role was the establishment of a forest products laboratory in 1913,<br />
with a second, along with the first forest experiment station, in 1918. A Division<br />
of Forest Research was 'organised in 1921. With transfer ,of their forest resources<br />
to the'Prairie provinces in 1930 the Branch role became almost solely forest<br />
research.<br />
The first federal entomologist was appointed in 1884 and routinely included<br />
forest insects in his annual report, but the real imp'etus to forest entomology<br />
occurred in 1909 with the appointment of a new Dominion Entomologist and<br />
an officer-in-charge of forest insect investigations in 1911. A Division of Forest<br />
Insects was formed in 1916, becolning an organisation with five regional<br />
laboratories by 1935. A Dominion Botanist was appointed in 1909, and sporadic<br />
forest disease investigations were made until in 1920 a forest pathologist was<br />
appointed. The forest entomology and forest pathology groups were formed into<br />
the Division of Forest Biology in 1951.<br />
The provincial forest services, too, usually began with one man appointed as a<br />
Crown Timber Agent, Clerk of <strong>Forestry</strong>, or similar title, in a Lands branch or<br />
section. Their duties often were somewhat vague and ap'pear to have depended<br />
on the,personality of the app-ointe-e'.<br />
In Newfoundland d,uring 1900-1934 a small staff administered the collection of<br />
revenue, forest fire protection and logging camp' inspection. This period coincided<br />
with the rise of the p-ulp' and paper industry. A <strong>Forestry</strong> Division was established<br />
in 1934 in the then Department of Natural Resources. It is now a considerably<br />
enlarge-d Division of <strong>Forestry</strong> in the Department of Mines, Agriculture and<br />
Resources.<br />
a-wing to the small extent of its forest land, Prince Edward Island has only a<br />
small forestry unit located in the Department of Agriculture-.
126 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
of Bachelor of Science in <strong>Forestry</strong>. An optio-n in forest engineering leads to the<br />
Bachelor of Science in Forest Engineering.<br />
Graduate degrees of Master of Science in <strong>Forestry</strong> and Master of <strong>Forestry</strong> are<br />
now offered. The first M.Sc.(F) was awarded in 1917. Until 1946 a postgraduate<br />
degree could be obtained by a candidate who had three to' five years forestry<br />
experience and submitted a thesis on a forestry subject. One year in residence- became<br />
a requirement in 1946, and now the time needed to qualify for the M.Sc.(F)<br />
averages about two years.<br />
To the end of 1969 the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> had awarded a total of 1,068<br />
bachelor degrees and 93 master degrees. Planning .is in hand for a Ph.D. in <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
-projected for 1971-72.<br />
THE FACULTY OF FORESTRY & GEODESY OF LAVAL<br />
THE FACULTY OF FORESTRY and Geodesy of Laval University maintains one of the<br />
country's oldest technical traditions, while it keeps abreast with the most advanced<br />
techniques of science: the Faculty's main purpose is to achieve the best teaching<br />
possible in all sciences dealing with land measurement and forest resources development.<br />
At the very b'eginning of our country, surveyors as well as 11ydrographers were<br />
at work to prepare maps and accurate surv'eys of property. In 1674, the Council of<br />
the Colony issued a regulation stating the p'rocedures to be followed concerning<br />
the surveys, and at the same time, the rules for wood scaling in public forests. The<br />
difficulties that faced the first explorers to- acquire a more precise knowledge of<br />
the new lands discovered have not decreased in recent years. Most of our country<br />
is only partly kno,wn today, and detailed surveys of the land are to be- completed.<br />
The continual app-earance of new scientific techniques in such broad and diversified<br />
fields, namely the use of earth satellites for accurate forest mapping, is a challenge<br />
to modern foresters and forest research scientists.<br />
The esta'bllishment of a school of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Laval results from long-standing<br />
consideration. The scho-ol was established in 1910, when it became obvious that<br />
the traditional rule-of-thumb methods used in logging our virgin forest stands<br />
needed to be improved and that it was evident that more intensive' forestry<br />
practices had to be applied in order to prote'ct and manage effectively our forest<br />
resources.<br />
The develop1ment of the school was at first rather slow and far from what was<br />
really needed. In 1919 the School of <strong>Forestry</strong> was merged with the School of Land<br />
Surveying, which had b,een established in 1907, to become the- Schooll of Land<br />
Surveying and <strong>Forestry</strong>. In 1927, the School was given more adequate premises.<br />
Then, in 1941, a more elaborate teaching programme was adopted, which led to the<br />
establishment of the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Geodesy.<br />
In 1966, the Laval University Council, after careful study, ap-proved a reorganisation<br />
of the structures of the Faculty aiming at training more co'mprehensively<br />
specialists in all fields of land develop'ment. Thus, three forestry departments,<br />
namely forest management and silviculture, forest ecology and soil science, and<br />
logging and wood science, were established within the Faculty. Two other departments<br />
are concerned with geodesy and cartograp-hy, and with p,hotogrammetry.<br />
Since 1910, more than 800 people received their baccalaureate in applied science<br />
(forestry) from this institution. The number of students in forestry at Laval is<br />
currently about 260, and in the recent years between 50 and 60 B.Sc.A. diplo-mas<br />
have been granted annually. Th-ere are at present abo-ut 60 students engaged in<br />
research activities leading to the M.Sc.F. or Ph.D. degrees. The staff in <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
comprises some 30 full-time professors and a number of part-time- lecturers<br />
specialised in various disciplines of the forest science.
CANADA 121<br />
LAVAL UNIVERSITY FOREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION<br />
THE LAVAL UNIVERSITY Forest Researc'h Foundation is an autonomous body,<br />
incorporated under the provisions of the Queb,ec Companies Act, which came into<br />
existence by letters-patent signed December 22, 1954. It operates in very close cooperation<br />
with Laval University. The Foundation's headquarters are located in the<br />
same building as the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Geodesy on the new University<br />
Campus known -as the Cite universitaire. The Foundatio·n owes its existence and<br />
continuity to the financial contributions made annually by the pulp and paper<br />
industries operating within the Province of Quebec and the Quebec Department<br />
of Lands and Forests. There are two classes of members: corporate members who<br />
supply the bulk of financial resources and private members (mostly forest engineers)<br />
paying annual dues.<br />
Administratio'n is in the hands of a bo-ard of 14 directors elected by members<br />
attending the annual meeting. The Dean of the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Geodesy is<br />
ex-officio mem'ber of the board. The Director of Research, appointed by the<br />
board, is a Faculty member who devotes most of his time to set up the programme<br />
of research, select the directors of projects,app·oint scientific and technical personnel<br />
and present an annual report. The financial assistance of the Foundation<br />
has enabled postgraduate students working on specific projects to obtain the degree<br />
of master or doctor.<br />
Research workers can take full advantage of the Faculty's fine laboratory facilities<br />
and modern' equipment in carrying research, fundamental or applied, in diversified<br />
asp'ects of forestry. The Beausejour Forest, owned by the Foundatio,n, and<br />
the large Montmorency Forest belonging to the University offer excellent opportunities<br />
for field work. Through the Foundation the Faculty was pro-vided with<br />
greenhouse, comp,uter and some special equipment.<br />
Two types of publications are issued by the Foundation: "Contribution," in<br />
which results of research are published, and "Bulletin" which deal with technical<br />
questions. B-oth app-ear irregularly; up to now 14 "Contribution" and 13 "Bulletin"<br />
have been distributed in 'Canada and, through exchange agreement, to over 700<br />
institutions throughout the world. All printed material received is deposited and<br />
classified at the Faculty library where it is available to teachers, postgraduate and<br />
pregraduate students.<br />
Research projects implying large tracts of forests have be'en or are actually carried<br />
o,n by the Foundation for the Quebec Department of Lands and Forests; the<br />
ensuing rep,orts are published by the Quebec Government.<br />
FOREST EDUCATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF<br />
BRITISH COLUMBIA<br />
THE Provincial Legislature of the Province ,of British Columbia passed a University<br />
,Act in 1908 authorising a Provincial University, but it was not until 1915 that the<br />
lJniversity of British Columbia began its educational programme. At that time<br />
provision was made for establishing a Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, 'but it was 1921<br />
before definite plans w'ere made to ,provide instructi'o'n in <strong>Forestry</strong>. In that year a<br />
Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> was organised in the Faculty of Applied Science and an<br />
Associate Professor was appointed to organise a course to be offered in the fall<br />
term. A second Faculty appointment was made in 1922 to help forward the plan...<br />
ni!ng and execution of a four year curriculum in Forest Engineering. The department<br />
status was continued until 1951 when the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> came into being.<br />
From 1922 to 1939 the only programme in <strong>Forestry</strong> was the Engineering<br />
curriculum offered in the Faculty of Applied Science leading to the degree of
128 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
B.A.Sc. in Forest Engineering. The curriculum was designed to give the student<br />
a sound engineering background with adde'd provision for training in forest<br />
management, timber cruising, log scaling, lumber grading and certain aspects<br />
regarded as sub-professional in nature, it did serve to meet the demands of that<br />
earlier time. Such specialised technical courses as log scaling, lum1ber grading and<br />
timber cruising were eliminated from the curriculum in 1939.<br />
In 1939 the Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> introduced a five year programme leading to<br />
the double degree of Bachelor of Arts (in Botany or Commerce) and Bachelor of<br />
Science in <strong>Forestry</strong>. The earlier B.A.Sc. degree in Forest Engineering was continued.<br />
In both cases an identical fifth year almost exclusively of <strong>Forestry</strong>, was<br />
added to the four years of the B.A. curriculum or the B.A.Sc. curriculum.<br />
In recognition of the fact that the single final year of <strong>Forestry</strong> in the five year<br />
double degree programme did not provide adequate technical training for a professional<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> course, a decision was reached in 1946 to discontinue that programme<br />
in favour of a four year course of study after a first year university level<br />
science leading t,o the single degre;e of Bachelor of Scie'nce in <strong>Forestry</strong>. At that time,<br />
three options were established in the B.S.F. programme: technical forestry, forest<br />
business administration, and chemical wood products.<br />
Subsequently, periodic changes were made in the option system beginning in<br />
1948 when chemical wood products was dropped and three new programmes<br />
were introduced-forest pathology, forest entomology and forest wildlife management.<br />
Further additions were made in 1953 with the introduction of the forest<br />
products and wood technology option and in 1960 a forest harvesting option. In<br />
1962 the technical forestry option was sub-divided into forest management and<br />
silvics.<br />
The curricululTI leading to the degre'e of B.A.Sc. in Forest Engine,ering was<br />
suspended as a programme in the Faculty of Applied Science in 1962 due to a lack<br />
of student interest and recognition of the need to increase <strong>Forestry</strong> content in the<br />
programme. The following year the harvesting option was strengthened by the<br />
inclusion of several courses in the Department of Civil Engineering curriculum and<br />
pertinent courses taught in the Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>.<br />
A major review of the B.S.F. curriculum was undertaken in 1961 and became<br />
fully operative in all years in 1964. This curriculum strengthened the offerings in<br />
forest managem:ent, woo,d technology and forest products and in the fields of<br />
Botany, Forest Soils and Zoology. Further modifications of the curriculum and<br />
numerous additions to staff have been made since 1967 when the Faculty moved<br />
to a new building shared with the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Basic science<br />
offerings were strengthened, student contact hours were re,duced to a maximum<br />
of 25 hours p,er week and provision for a choice of ele'ctives was increased. The<br />
present staff consists ·of 24 full-time and three part-time profess-ors, one research<br />
associate, a director of researc'h forests and a supporting technical and clerical<br />
staff of approximately 15.<br />
The options in the und:ergraduate curriculum are now wood science, silvics,<br />
land management, wildlife, business administration and 'harvesting. The pres'ent<br />
curriculum is designed to p,rovide a str,ong well rounde,d professional education<br />
and at the same time provid'e the student through the choice of electives, an op,portunity<br />
to supplement his knowle,dge of allie'd sciences as a background for further<br />
specialise-d education. All options pr-ovide a basic knowledge ,of arts and sciences<br />
and their al"plication to forestry problems. Programmes can b'e plann'ed individually<br />
for students interested in the management ,of the forest environment, range lands,<br />
recreation and watersheds. C10urses stress change, evolution and diversity, the a'im<br />
of the programme being to produce flexible, effective and perceptive graduates<br />
capable of developing within society and of meeting the challenges posed by<br />
technological and socialogical inovations as they occur in the future.
CANADA 129<br />
SOPRON DMSION-FACULTY OF FORESTRY<br />
THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA<br />
IN September 1957, 154 students and 22 staff of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Faculty. University<br />
of Sopro,n, b-egan their classes at the University of British Columbia. Thus ended<br />
the first phase of a' drama that began with the Hungarian revolution of October<br />
23, 1956, reached a climax with the flight to Austria of the majority of the students<br />
and staff on November 4, 1956, and attained a second peak with their departure<br />
from Liverpool for Canada on New Year's Day, 1957.<br />
The migration of a large section of a University to a distant foreign land probably<br />
is unique in ·history. It c.ame about through the efforts of the Canadian<br />
Government and the co-opera1tion extended by the Powell River Company and this<br />
University. All those who helped to carry the migration through did so for<br />
humanitarian reasons.<br />
The curriculum of the Sopron Division was fairly typical of the professional<br />
forestry schools of Europe and compares favourably with that of North American<br />
schools. Entrance in Hungary was from the equivalent of Senior Matriculation.<br />
Th'e course required four years followed by final comprehensive examin·ations.<br />
Considerable emphasis was given to both engineering and biology as well as to<br />
professional .forestry courses.<br />
The first senior class of 28 students -of the Sopron Division gradu'ated in March<br />
1958. The oth'er classes graduated in subsequent years 'and the Sopron Division<br />
ceased to exist at the University in May 1961. Altogether 137 students graduated<br />
and they are taking their part in the ,development of Canad-a carrying with them<br />
the ex,perience and traditio-ns of their homeland in the service of their adopted<br />
country.<br />
4
NEW ZEALAND<br />
The New Zealand Forest Service<br />
THE NEW ZEALAND Forest Service was formed belatedly a little more than 50 years ago.<br />
Long before the establishment of the present department there had been attempts to<br />
set up forest administrations, but they were short lived owing to the opposition they<br />
aroused or to economic difficulties that lead to retrenchment in government services.<br />
At the time of its occupation by Europeans in the 19th century New Zealand<br />
was heavily forested, and the main effort ofsettlers was often directed to land clearance<br />
to make way for farms, large areas of forest being felled without extraction of produce<br />
and burnt. There quickly developed, too, an aggressive sawmilling industry to exploit<br />
for local use and for sale overseas the extensive resource of high-quality native timbers,<br />
especially the massive kauri (Agathis australis), for which there was a ready market in<br />
Australia.<br />
Against a background of settler preoccupation with land clearance and a plentiful<br />
(seemingly inexhaustible) supply of excellent, cheap timber it was difficult to develop<br />
control over the disposal or exploitation of forested land; nor was there much support<br />
for afforestation except in a few naturally treeless areas.<br />
By the time the Forest Service came into being there was urgent need for evaluation<br />
of remaining forest resources and of practicable means of ensuring supplies of wood<br />
in perpetuity. One of the earliest tasks set the Forest Service by its first Director of<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> (L. MacIntosh Ellis, a Canadian forestry graduate) was reconnaissance of<br />
the forested and mountain land as a preliminary to a timber resource inventory and<br />
an assessment of the condition of the vegetation in the upper catchments of important<br />
rivers. The results were used as a guide to where more State forest needed to be proclaimed<br />
to safeguard as much as possible of the commercial and protection forest.<br />
Early Reforms<br />
Among the main duties of the new department were administration of the disposal<br />
of cutting rights in State forests and continuation of a modest programme of planting.<br />
Reforms were introduced to formalise the traditionally loose arrangements for sale of<br />
timber from State forests. These had produced poor royalties and led to wasteful<br />
extraction and milling, legacies of which still remain in the form of cut-over areas<br />
that are difficult and expensive to reclaim.<br />
An estimate of forest resources made by the Forest Service in the early 1920s threw<br />
serious doubts on the adequacy of the native forests to meet future needs. By this time,<br />
too, there was a better realisation that the preferred timber species were extremely<br />
slow growing and exceedingly difficult to re-establish. It was prudent to assume that<br />
logging by the methods in force-and there was little hope of modifying theseended<br />
the forests' economic life.<br />
To avert a timber famine the Forest Service recommended increasing the total area<br />
of State plantations of exotic trees from 63,000 acres in 1925 to 300,000 acres by 1935.<br />
The Forest Service had, fortunately, developed organisation and techniques for greatly<br />
expanding planting, which was increased rapidly to reach 50,000 acres a year at the<br />
peak, 1929-31. Enthusiasm for planting was at one time so great that there were<br />
visions of planting 5 million acres of waste land over 25 years. However, by 1937 the<br />
total planted area (State and company) had reached almost 950,000 acres. After that<br />
planting fell away sharply until well after the World War 11.<br />
Fundamental Change in Forest Practice<br />
The large-scale planting of quick-growing exotic species (mainly Pinus radiata)<br />
initiated by the Forest Service, and enthusiastically pursued by afforestation companies,<br />
brought a fundamental change in forestry practice. It ushered in the first era<br />
of sustained-yield forests that would support industry permanently, in contrast to<br />
the "cut and get out" single harvest from the milling of native stands.<br />
As the plantation trees began to reach maturity it became apparent that the timber<br />
130
NORTHERN IRELAND 135<br />
There has been some conflict between creating employment and economic return,<br />
but the "Unemployment Relief Schemes" have been replaced by a Government "Rural<br />
Improvement Campaign" in which the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division is taking part and under this<br />
Scheme supervision at Forester level has been separated from supervision of regular<br />
squads and the conflict minimised.<br />
In 1922 there was only one Forest Officer and two Foresters in the Division. The<br />
number of Foresters had increased to 11 by the war and after a rapid rise during the<br />
1950s the numbers of Foresters and Forest Officers reached 121 and 24 respectively<br />
in 1964. Since then the numbers have dropped to 107 Foresters and 18 Forest Officers.<br />
The reductions are mostly due to reduced work especially on road construction and<br />
production and to greater emphasis on efficient working. It is of interest that the first<br />
Technical Head of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, until he retired in 1950, was a Scotsman, Mr.<br />
D. Stewart, who had joined the Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction<br />
in 1911 (just before the first State planting in Northern Ireland). He died only last year<br />
and so lived through the start of State planting in Northern Ireland to the virtual<br />
completion of the first 100,000 acres 60 years later.<br />
Since the first Forest Park in Northern Ireland was opened in 1955 there has been<br />
increasing use of the recreation facilities illustrated by the greater number of cars<br />
visiting Forest Parks and scenic drives each year.<br />
As mentioned already, a White Paper "<strong>Forestry</strong> in Northern Ireland" in which the<br />
Governn1ent's intentions for the future are set out is at present before Parliament.
AFRICA 137<br />
mercial export. Some 112,000 cu. ft classified as mahogany but likely to be a mixture<br />
of Khaya and Enta.ndrophragma spec'ies were exported.<br />
With poor communications and no implements of traction and elevation, logs<br />
had to be produced within man-po'wered hauling distance of the lo-wer reaches of a<br />
few rivers. The industry, however, continued to expand, reaching a pea-k in 1913<br />
of 3 million cu. ft. The First World War brought about a decline.<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> De'partment was formed in 1909, on the recommendations of H. N.<br />
Thompson, Co-nservator of Forests, Southern Nig.eria, who toured the country<br />
extensively in 1908. He suggested, amongst other things, the introduction of a<br />
Forest Policy, enactm'ent of Forest Legislation, protection of timber trees, intro·<br />
duction of property marks for tree-fellers, collection of botanical and working<br />
plan data and the formation of plantations.<br />
A Timber Protection Ordinance had been enacted in 1907, but the Forest Bill<br />
introduce-d in 1910 was frustrate-d by local sentiment and never became an<br />
Ordinance till 1927. 'Constituting Forest Reserves by Native Authority by-laws<br />
was also painfully slow. As' the De'partment was also closed fro-m 1915 to 1919, time<br />
was lost.<br />
Once antipathy to reservation was overcome, creation of Forest Reserves became<br />
the main task. Collec!tion of botanical data, exploratory studies into the Silviculture<br />
of indigenous trees, trials with exotics and ecological studies received attention.<br />
On the utilisation side, research into drying, shrinkage, working qualities and<br />
preservation was carried out and sawmilling and pitsawing encouraged.<br />
The opening of the Accra-Kumasi railway in 1924 fo'llowing that of Sekondi<br />
Kumasi in 1923, and the introduction of motorised tractors spread the industry<br />
through the high forest zone but the depressed state of the market in the years<br />
between the two world wars kept exptorts below the 3 million cu. ft. mark. In<br />
some years it was difficult to reach t million cu. ft.<br />
With reservation proceeding more steadily, attention was turned to the survey<br />
of resources, the preparation of working plans and the natural rege,neration of local<br />
species.<br />
The Second World War interrupited this work and organisation of sup'plies to<br />
meet service requirements be-came the order of the day. Officers showed their versatility<br />
in supplying such diverse p'roducts as rubber, gums, kapok, canes, shingles,<br />
mats, wooden limbs and honey in addition to lumber and p'oles.<br />
The war also offered the opportunity of trying out cOtmmercially, species other<br />
than mahogany. The end of it brought about an unprecedented b,oom in the industry<br />
evident in both volume, value: and range of species. An interesting phenomenon<br />
was the rise -of Triplochiton scleroxylon from obscurity to fame. Thus whereas<br />
in the five years 1934-38 the average annual cut was 1.3 million cu. ft, by 1947 it<br />
was 6.2 million eu. ft and by 1957 43 million cu. ft. It has fluctuated between this<br />
and 60 million cu. ft since then.<br />
Interest in hardwood supplies was great and directed towards local manufacture.<br />
From a dozen sawmills pre-war the figure rose to, 60 with five plywood factories<br />
following. The scramble for concessions started then and has stayed with us till<br />
today.<br />
Silvicultural research was intensified and a metho,d of regenerating under a<br />
shelterwood with varying canop'y de-nsities successfully evolved. Several factors,<br />
including cost, have led to- the adoption today of more extensive refining treatment<br />
where the stocking of desired species is satisfactory and planting where it is not.<br />
Yields in forest reserves are regulated on the basis of available data o'n times<br />
of passage ,between girth classes. Further data suggest that a review is due. Outside<br />
forest reserves where farming is uncontrolled maximum utilisation is encouraged.<br />
Train'ing of technical officers is done locally at the <strong>Forestry</strong> School, Sunyani, and<br />
Forest Research is today undertaken by the Forests Institute of the Council for<br />
Scientific and Industrial Research based at Kumasi.
AFRICA 141<br />
Annual Expenditure: £800,000-56 per cent on protection/plantation forestry;<br />
32 per cent on forest industry and 12 per cent on wildlife.<br />
Annual Income: £366,000-Forest Industry £301,000; Other forest income<br />
£48,000; Wildlife £17,000.<br />
NIGERIA<br />
In the last years of the nineteenth century far-sighted Colonial administrators<br />
began to realise the dangers of uncontrolled exploitation of the forests for mahogany<br />
logs and wanton clearanc,e for farming. Real efforts to establish organised forestry<br />
began in 1887 but the birth of the Nigerian Forest Service only took place in 1903<br />
with the appointment of H. N. Thompson, C.M.G., ex-Indian Forest Service, as<br />
Conservator of Forests, Southern Nigeria Protectorate. He remained the dominant<br />
figure in West African <strong>Forestry</strong> for the next 26 years. In the light of subsequent<br />
developments in other territories it is interesting to note that the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department<br />
was also responsi'ble for Agriculture and it was not until 1910 that a separate<br />
Agricultural Departm'ent was established.<br />
During the first decade of Thompson's administration the chief duties of the new<br />
Department were the control of mahogany exploitation and of rubber collection<br />
from a variety of latex-producing plants, species which were later to prove invaluable<br />
in World War 11. With his India background Thompson was fully aware of<br />
the need to obtain security of tenure of areas within which to practise long-term<br />
forestry. This was an uphill struggle; opposition from villagers, politicians and<br />
often the administration itself seriously impeded this work.<br />
Following the administrative un1ion of Northern with Southern Nigeria in 1914<br />
the unified Nigeria Forest Service came into being the next year with the amalgamation<br />
under Thompson as Director of the relative forestry staffs, that of the North<br />
comprising only two officers on the roll of the Director of Agriculture. The title<br />
of the De'partmental Head was subsequently altered to Chief Conservator and<br />
remained this until, in accordance with major constitutional changes, the creation<br />
of the ephemeral Inspector-General of Forests (1950-54).<br />
One lasting and important tliadition established by Thompson was the use of<br />
botanical names. He early appreciated the impossibility of carrying out any<br />
silvicultural work using vernacular names which changed from village to village<br />
as the languages changed. To this day every officer from the most junior forest<br />
guard upwards is conversant with the botanical names of the majo,r tree species in<br />
his area. In 1909 Thomps'on imp,orted :the first teak seeds from Burma, a species<br />
now widely used in plantations.<br />
The real expansion of the Department started afte'r World War I with an influx<br />
of profession,ally trained e'xpatriate officers from British universities. Between the<br />
two wars the work of establishing forest reserves made appreciable progress despi!te<br />
eontinued oPP'ositi'on. The land tenure situation in Nigeria is unique in as far as it<br />
affects forest reservation. The reserves were mainly created on tribal lands and<br />
remained the property of the tribe or family who were designated "owners" and<br />
were, and still are, entitled to royalties from any produce removed.<br />
On the silvicultural side it was originally thought that the Nigerian rain forests<br />
would be self-perpetuating and could readily and economically be worked on a<br />
selection felling basis. On those principles co,ncessions were granted in the Benin<br />
area based on the simplest of Working Plans prescribing a hundred-year felling<br />
cycle with a minimum girth limit. It was ultimately realised that these were overmature<br />
forests with an absence of younger age classes. This simple selection<br />
system was then replaced by a version of TSS (Tropical Shelterwood System) based<br />
on Malayan practice. At the present time the general tendency throughout Nigeria<br />
is towards intensive silviculture or "compensatory" plantations.
142 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
In the 1930s forest administrative changes divided the country into three Regions,<br />
North, West and East, in each of w'hich forestry was administered by an Assistant<br />
Chief Conservator responsible to the Chief Conservator with headquarters in<br />
Ibadan. In 1950 with the creation of the post of Inspector-Gener;al of Forests<br />
these officers became designated Chief Conservators. In 1954 the three Regions<br />
were given autonomous status within the newly created Federation of Nigeria.<br />
The Cameroons have a separate histo'ry. In 1919 part of the former German<br />
colony of Kamerun was mandated to Nigeria fo'r administrative purposes, being<br />
first a part of the Southern Region and later of the Eastern Region. In 1960 as a<br />
result of a plebiscite the territory separated from Nigeria and joine'd the French<br />
Cameroons to become the independent state of Came-roon.<br />
In the 1950s many important changes came about. The timber industry, mainly<br />
an export trade in logs, had to all intents and purp·oses been confined to the<br />
Western Regio-n through Lagos, Sapele and other ports of the Niger delta. 1954<br />
saw the long-wished-for but unexpected developm'ent of a healthy export trade<br />
from Cross River forests through Calabar. Even more far-reaching was the training<br />
of Nigerian natio'nals Ito fill senior posts in an administration a-bout to ac'hieve its<br />
full independence from Colonial status. As early as 1925 some attempt had been<br />
made to provide training for the improvement of Forest Guards; but it was not<br />
until the 1940s that a prop-er <strong>Forestry</strong> School was originate·d in Ibadan for the<br />
purpose of producing a technical staff intermediate between the protective staff<br />
and the officers with a view to relieving these last from several time-absorbing<br />
tasks of a non-professio,nal nature. The best products of this sc'hool were now<br />
selected for special university training as qualified forest officers, and by 1952 the<br />
first Oxford trained Nigerians we're appointed as Assistant Conservators. In 1962<br />
the first Nigerian Chief Conservator was appointed. It may here be added that<br />
there has for so'me years been a Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> within the University of<br />
Ibadan, awarding its own degrees in this subject.<br />
With approaching indep-endence in 1954 the Nigerian Forest Department, at<br />
that time the biggest in the Colonial Service, was necessarily divided into four<br />
units; but at the same time the Federal Forest Research Institute at Ibadan was<br />
created and now operates throughout the country for the benefit of all the States.<br />
The more recent history of Nigeria with the sad incidence of the civil war is<br />
well known. In 1967 twelve States were created out of the four existing Regions<br />
(a Mid-West Region had been created in 1963), resulting in the formation of twelve<br />
State <strong>Forestry</strong> Services in addition to the Federal Department of Forest Research.<br />
On the 1st January, 1970, a new Fe-deral Departme-nt of <strong>Forestry</strong> was created<br />
together with a ne-w post of Director, the latter's duties being to advise the<br />
Federal Go,vernment on the co-ordination of all matters pertaining to- conservation,<br />
utilisation and renewal of the forest resources in Nigeria, in particular their<br />
economic feasibility.<br />
No account of forestry in Nigeria would be complete without some reference to<br />
Research. Recorded researc'h work began with the work of J. D. Kennedy at<br />
Sapoba and W. D. McGregor at Olokemejie during the period 1925-1933. A forest<br />
herbarium was established in 1942 incorporating the earlier collections of Kennedy<br />
and others; this has now become possibly the best collection in tropical Africa and<br />
is housed in a fine new air-conditioned building. A silviculturist was appointed to<br />
the staff of the Inspector-General of Forests in 1951. In 1954 with the abolition<br />
of the post of Inspector-General the Federal Department of Forest Research came<br />
into being simultaneo'usly with the three autonomous regional forestry services.<br />
The annual research programmes were app'roved by a Committee consisting of the<br />
Regional Chief Conservators with the Director of Forest Research as Chairman.<br />
Initially investigations were mainly silvicultural, but have since been expanded to<br />
include a substantial forest products research laboratory and work on tree physiology,<br />
ecology, pathology and forest soils.
AFRICA 145<br />
then worth £9,876. There was therefore ample room for expansion. This soon took<br />
place with the demand caused by the reduction of imports and military activity during<br />
the second world war. Pitsawing proved incapable of supplying the greatly expanded<br />
market and a <strong>Forestry</strong> Company of the Engineers came to Freetown when W. D.<br />
MacGregor was Conservator and set up a sawmill at No. 2 River in the Colony.<br />
A second mill was installed at Kasewe and a third at Kenema. Rapid expansion<br />
resulted till at the end of the war the No. 2 River and Kasewe mills were closed and<br />
luoved to Kenema where the nucleus of the army personnel remained to develop<br />
the Kenema Forest Industries. This large unit, controlled by the 1960 working plan,<br />
used over forty species, classifying them into furniture, construction and utility woods;<br />
it expanded the embryo furniture industry started at Kasewe in 1943 into a large-scale,<br />
high quality production unit for furniture and prefabricated houses and schools,<br />
still as part of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department. Soon after 1960 the fetters of departmental<br />
finance were eased by creating a Government Corporation with R. A. Price, C.B.E.,<br />
\vho had done so much to develop the Industries, as Managing Director.<br />
As a corporation "Kenema Forest Industries" installed a completely new Stenner<br />
sawmill, purchased up to date preservation and kiln drying equipment and built<br />
a fine showroom near Freetown. Price remained in charge till 1970, assisted by some<br />
of the men who joined during the war. This unit has probably achieved the most<br />
complete utilisation of tropical high forest to be found in Africa. Its success has been<br />
due to concentration on the local market, the marketing ofclassified groups of species<br />
and the inspired direction ofits General Manager and his predecessors. There was one<br />
private sawmill in production after the war and recently efforts have been made to<br />
develop small scale sawmilling at Kasewe.<br />
From the early beginnings silviculture developed along three lines; natural<br />
regeneration, enrichment planting and taungya plantations. Under natural regeneration<br />
the lack of high quality species in the original forest made it difficult to obtain a<br />
greater concentration ofvaluable species in the regeneration, consequently MacGregor<br />
instigated line planting in 1940 to enrich exploited areas at Kasewe and Kenema and<br />
in some Protected Forests. The main species used were Terminalia ivorensis, Nauclea<br />
diderrichii and Tarrietia utiliSe In secondary growth this was successful but at Kenema,<br />
in high forest, these light demanders and other more shade bearing species gave<br />
disappointing results under the natural forest canopy, although this had been considerably<br />
opened by removal of the merchantable timber and by poison girdling. By<br />
1963 the department was turning more to plantation forestry. .<br />
Taungya farming was employed wherever possible to create plantations of closely<br />
grown light demanders and Gmelina arborea became the favourite species. Unfortunately<br />
this tree tends to die on many of the sites used between the 15th and 18th years.<br />
'This has made it essential to develop a very heavy thinning regime in the early years<br />
in order to maintain rapid growth.<br />
Since Sierra Leone became independent in 1961, the Department has been absorbed<br />
into the Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources and .has taken over control,<br />
under J. S. Sawyerr, of rubber production on a commercial scale in the south-east<br />
of the country. Expansion of the area of forest reserves has slowed down and remains<br />
at about 800 square miles, of which about 300 square miles are productive high forest.<br />
There remains to be solved the regeneration of exploited forest at a rate equal to the<br />
rate of cutting. This is probably the greatest problem facing forestry in Sierra Leone.<br />
TANZANIA<br />
(Formerly Tanganyika)<br />
Originally colonised by the Germans and known as German East Africa the<br />
territory had a forestry history dating from 1897. A succession of German<br />
foresters established Reserves, made Working Plans, laid down plantations of<br />
local and exotic species and p,ublished a game ordinance. A full account of German<br />
forest activities could well fill a fair-sized book and is beyond the scope of this<br />
5
146 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
brief historical note. It is worth recording that those early efforts provided guidance<br />
and a springboard for later activities of British foresters.<br />
During the 1914-1918 war the territory was fought over backwards and forwards.<br />
General Von Helton, the German commander, eve·ntually surrendere'd in Northern<br />
Rhodesia. Tanganyika was devastated and in 1918 decimate'd by famine and<br />
influenza. The British Government imp10verishedby the war gave grants in aid for<br />
three years and then she had to fend for herself, once the favoure'd German colony<br />
no,w the cinderella of the Empire.<br />
In D-ecember 1920 D. K. S. Grant who had entered the territory with Kenya<br />
Forces and who had had exp'erience as a- Forest O-fficer in Kenya and a District<br />
Commissioner in Tanganyika, was appointed to the new Department, which was<br />
staffed early in 1921 with a Conservator, a Senior A.C.F. and 3 A.'C.F.'s, 5<br />
Europ,ean foresters, a Forest Surveyor and 100 Forest Guards. Legislation was<br />
based on the German until the publication of the 1921 O'rdinance with a Schedule<br />
of 231 Reserves with detailed boundaries based on the German settlements. The<br />
first emp1hasis, justifiable whe-n one considers the disparity of finance to personal<br />
emoluments, was in enumeration. A fault must be made of the lack of publicat!ion<br />
of these efforts. The Southern and the Northern slopes of Kilimanjaro-, Misoziro<br />
and the Shumi Maganba forests were enumerated in the twenties and thirties. Only<br />
a part of the latter received notice in an article by Jo'hn Pitt in the Journal of<br />
Ecology. Plantation work was begun in S,humi, Maganba, Moshi, Arusha, Dar es<br />
Salaam and Ruko'ba in these early years, the emphasis being on local species. Tons<br />
of mangrove embryos were also planted to spe'ed up the succession on new mud<br />
banks. These areas, Kilwa, the Rufiji Delta, Dar es Salaam and Tanga, provided<br />
tanning bark for export to the D.S.A. and Germany and ,building poles for the<br />
Persian Gulf, the dhows co,ming down o,n the NE and returning on the SE monsoon.<br />
Zanzibar had 10,000 extra sailors during a good season. In 1927 the Oar es Salaam<br />
division was extended to cover ,t'he whole Ce'ntral Railway, and the German Reserves<br />
of the Brachystegia forest were located. This was the beginning of increasing<br />
interest in this area leading to the enumeration of reserves o-ver thousands of miles<br />
with the chief 'object of controlling the yield of Pterocarpus angolensis, for a long<br />
time the most imp'ortant timber of the territo,ry. About this time there were 16<br />
nurseries and 3 sawmills in the territory and revenue justbalance,d expenditure.<br />
A land Develo,pme'nt Survey (5 Euro,peans and up to 150 plorters) spent over 6<br />
mo-nths in the Southern Highlands looking for White Settlement areas, Forest<br />
Reserves and watching African interests. Some reservation was o,btained from the<br />
area and fro,m the Northern Province, when the Survey moved there. The beginning<br />
of the thirties saw a w,orld-wide trade depression.<br />
Slump conditions lasted right up to the war, Grant retiring in 1938 when the<br />
Department was taken over by W. M. Robertson. A 10-year plan was being<br />
broached under Colonial Development and Welfare funds when the war broke<br />
out. On the same day Robertson handed o'ver the' Department to Wigg who in turn<br />
handed over to Markham. East Africa had three weak infantry brigades with no<br />
ancillary arms facing Italians alleged to have 200,000 troops and all arms including<br />
aircraft. The Department was completely deplete'd when hindsight says it should<br />
have been tre'bled. This should have been done as soon as the Abyssinian campaign<br />
was over.<br />
There is no space here to detail the beginning of the Ranger School and the<br />
great effort put into timber production during the war. Suffice it to say that we were<br />
lucky in Webb as a Utilisation Officer pione-ering the way to the outstanding<br />
Utilisation Unit organised by Hughes for investigating sawmilling, kiln and air<br />
seasoning, preservation, durability and stre'ngth tests, wood-working, plywoo:d,<br />
saw dootoring, etc. This has culminated in Buyers Commercial Timbers ,of Tanzania<br />
1967. The Conservator Robertson was succeeded,in 1951 b,y W. J. Eggeling from<br />
Uganda who later intvoduced Sangster from that service. The ,arrival of the new
AFRICA 14,7<br />
blood certainly did considerable good to the forestry of the Territory, particularly<br />
as they had not experienced the frustrations of the thirties and were on the crest<br />
of a wave of optimistic trading. Thousands ofsquare miles were added to the forest<br />
estate and very extensive enumeration made, particular by Groom who wrote up<br />
his account of Muninga (Pterocarpus angolensis) control, subseque'ntly embodied<br />
in a larger pamphlet. By 1952 the Department had exceeded expenditure since 1921<br />
by £450,000. Its 'highest revenue was in 1952-£209,000. In 1962-64 it was spending<br />
with the help of interest-free loans and CD & W grants over £500,000 on the 3-ye-ar<br />
plan. R. G. Sangster, C.B-.E., took over from Eggeling in 1954 and the first African<br />
Chief Conservator too,k over from him in 1965-G. J. Ki'leo. A new 5-year plan<br />
1964-68 was initiated. The last receive'd report, 1968, shows the forest estate at<br />
50,354 square miles. The plante'd area in 1965 was 46,000 acres. Everything points<br />
to a successful future for the Forest Department.<br />
UGANDA<br />
In 1899 the Botanical and Agricultural Department was cre:ated. The <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Department was set up on its o,wn in 1917.<br />
The first forestry work was the -exploration of the country's forest resources.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> legislation was enacted about 1900 an,d the first forest policy approved in<br />
1929. This was follo,wed by forest reservation in 1932. New reservation and<br />
excisions from reserves have been going on since then, though the bulk of the<br />
forest estate 'had be'en created by 1962. The size of the forest estate rose from<br />
1,412 sq. miles in 1932 to 6,230 sq. miles by 1970.<br />
Inventories and working plans were m'ade as early as 1904 and 1929 respectively.<br />
But more e'xtensive work was only po'ssible after the Second World War.<br />
In silviculture, the first efforts were directed towards the establishment ,of pole<br />
and fuel plantations and during the 1930s consider.able areas were planted. There<br />
are now 19,000 acres of these plantations. Artificial regeneration of timber was<br />
sltarted early using Mvule an'd Mahogany. Due to shortage of labo,ur and the<br />
depredations of wild animals and lof Mvule gall fiy, planting 'had to be abandoned.<br />
Enrichment planting was revived in the ,early 1960s. Planting' was at first done in<br />
gaps; later on, weed trees were being removed for woodfuel and charcoal followe'd<br />
by enrichment planting. This practice continues.<br />
Natural rege'neration techniques were started in 1950 and by 1954 a technique<br />
of tending mixe'd fo'rest ha'd been developed. This remains standard practice in<br />
forests where weed trees have nfo market.<br />
Softwood timber planting started in 1942 and by 1961 a total of 6,500 acres had<br />
be,en established, all cypress and pines. In 1970, plantations amounted to approx.<br />
20,000 acres and planting has be'en increased to 5,000 acres annu'ally.<br />
Commercial exploitatio'n of timber beg'an in 1908. Felling in 1923 amounted to<br />
140,000 cu. ft rising to 3t million cu. ft in 1960/61 and to 5.5 million cu. ft in<br />
1970. A notable feature of the post-war years has been the increased number of<br />
species 'harvested.<br />
Sawmilling which was started by Government in 1911 ,passed later entirely into<br />
private 'hands. A plywoo'd mill was established in 1959 and there are now also a<br />
match factory, a particle board plant, paper and paper conversion plants and<br />
a charcoal industry.<br />
Silvicultural research began with methods of ,planting and espacement of<br />
eucalyptus species. In 1933 the first research plots were laid out and in 1935<br />
experiments on natural regeneration meth,od;s were started. Since the early 1950s<br />
research has concentrated mainly on the establishment of plantations, enrichment<br />
planting and regenerati,o,n techniques in natural forests.<br />
Wood products research at first concentrated on collection and dispatch of<br />
timber for testing in ·other countries. In 1949/50 facilities were installed to, test<br />
5·
AFRICA 149<br />
annually to Mulo'bezi sawmill, situated at the end 6f what may be the longest<br />
forest tramway in Africa, running for approximately 104 bone-breaking miles<br />
upco,untry from Livingstone.<br />
The Department's other large-scale activity has been the supply of about two<br />
million cu. ft ·of indigenous timber annually to the mines of the Copperbelt, to<br />
which was a'dded during eight years of coal shortag'e from 1948 to 1955 the supply<br />
of 2,000 tons of wo'od-fuel a day for the mine power-stations.<br />
The lack lof any local softwood capable of replacing imported Oregon and the<br />
progressive cutting out of "Miombo" woodland accessible to, the mines and towns<br />
pro,mpted a keen interest in the establishment of plantations. Although research<br />
had been started in the 1930s, it was not until ab,out 1960 that the Forest Research<br />
Ce'ntre, whic'h had be'en establishe'd at Kitwe in 1954, succeeded in developing<br />
techniques for the establishment of tropical pines and eucalypts, which were equal<br />
to the harsh climatic and soil conditions of the Zambian plateau. It was then that<br />
Pinus kesiya, replacing the less robust Pinus patula, teamed up with Eucalyptus<br />
grandis as the front-runners.<br />
Altho,ugh plantation research was still in its infancy, national strategy required<br />
that industrial-scale plantations sh,ould go' ahead near the Gop,perbelt, and in 1963<br />
the Department's Industrial} Plantations Division began the first large-scale plantjngs<br />
for a 100,OOO-acre plantation project. This project, to, the Department's mild<br />
surprise in view of the silvicultural and utilisation risks that had been accepte'd<br />
natio,naIly, won the first World Bank forestry l'oan.<br />
Meanw'hile in many rural areas smaller-scale research and pilot plantings 'had<br />
been made against p,ossible future demand lo,cally for Eucalypt poles and softwood<br />
timber, and some of (these ,plantings :had in the more intensively farmed areas<br />
developed into local supp,ly plantations.<br />
The Fo'rest Products Centre at Kitwe, which came into being in 1963, expanded<br />
with breathtaking speed to deal with a range of utilisation research work on<br />
tropical pines and e,ucalypts.<br />
The Forest Training Centre at Mwekera near Kitwe', later the Forest College',<br />
opene'd its gates in 1949, and has provided pre-appointment and in-service c'ourses'<br />
for Foresters, Forest Rangers and Forest Guards, ,but the pattern of pre-indep'e:ndence<br />
e,ducation had resulte,d in very small numbers of school-leavers with university<br />
entrance qualIfications, and the Department faced the 1970s with onlly two<br />
Zam'bian P,orest Officers in post.<br />
Not the least e'xciting and satisfying of the: Dep,artment"s activities is the Beekeeping<br />
Division, established at Mwekera in 1959, which provides an extension<br />
service to help bark-h'ive beekeepers prodruct beeswax for export and !honey for<br />
local beer-brewing.
SOUTH-EAST ASIA<br />
CEYLON<br />
The evolution of forestry in Ceylon from the period of the British occupation<br />
up to the present time can be broadly divided into three phases where the emphasis<br />
has successively been on Forest Exploitation, Forest Conservation and Forest<br />
Development.<br />
Forest Exploitation<br />
From 1796 (which year marked the beginning 'of British rule in Ceylon) until<br />
nearly a century later, forestry consisted mainly of the exploitation of natural<br />
forests for domestic requirements and for export. By mid-nineteenth century<br />
Ebony (Diospyros ebenum), Satinwo,od (Chloroxylon swietenia) and Halmilla<br />
(Berrya cordijolia) were well known cabinet woods on the European market.<br />
Forest Officers (designated Foresters) were first appointed in 1873 and served<br />
under the Government Agents of the Provinces. The main function of the Foresters<br />
was to supervise and control the felling of trees in the state forests.* Small isolated<br />
plantations of Teak were raised in a few places, but this was more through the<br />
interest of individual foresters than as a matter of general policy.<br />
Forest Conservation<br />
The idea of conservation gained ground in the eighteen-eighties leading to the<br />
establishment of a Forest Department under a professionally trained officer from<br />
the Indian Forest 'Service in 1887. With the setting up ,of a Forest Department,<br />
Reserves and Proposed Reserves were esta·blished and attention paid to their<br />
proper demarcation and protection. The activities of the Department were finally<br />
placed on a firm legal foolting with the Forest Ordinance of 1907.<br />
As in the earlier period forest plantations were raised, but the extents planted<br />
were insignificant until the nineteen-twenties when there was a temporary surge of<br />
planting activity. Some fine plantations of Teak in the Dry Zone; Eucalypts,<br />
Pines and Cypress in the Montane Zone; and Jak (Artocarpus integra) and Mahogany<br />
in the Intermediate Zone are still stand:ing today.<br />
The temporary phase 'of increase,d reforestation activity in the nineteen-twenties<br />
and thirties was also marked by the establishment of the Silvicultural Research<br />
Unit in the De'partment. Ten years later, the Timber Utilisation Research Laboratory<br />
was established to· study the durability and the physical and mechanical<br />
properties of local timber and to collect timber samples and herbarium material.<br />
Forest Development<br />
The late nineteen fifties marked the beginning of a period of rapid agricultural<br />
expansion in the Dry Zone involving the clearing of large tracts of forest, much of<br />
it former Reserves. The urgency of extensive plantation development to offset this<br />
loss was apparent. As a result an impressive annual target of 16,000 acres of new<br />
plantations has been fix·ed.<br />
Teak is by far the most extensively planted species. Up to 1958 the total extent<br />
of Teak plantations was about 12,000 acres, while in the period 1958-1969 no less<br />
than 60,000 acres were added to this.<br />
The annual planting programme of 16,000 acres is made up as follows: Teak<br />
10,000 acres; Eucalypts (for pulp and timber) 1,500 acres; Pines (pulp) 1,500 acres;<br />
Light Hardwoods 500 acres; Bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus for pulp) 500 acres<br />
and Mahogany (enrichment planting in the Wet Zone) 2,000 acres. All Teak<br />
planting is done at a comparatively low 'cost to Government on a modified taungya<br />
system.<br />
* Over 95 per' cent of the forests in Ceylon are state-owned.<br />
150
SOUTH-EAST ASIA .15.1<br />
The natural forests of the Wet Zone will continue to 'be worked by selective<br />
felling on a sustained yield basis to supply light hardwoods for panel products,<br />
and hardwoods for building construction and railway sleepers.<br />
HONG KONG<br />
The Colony was founded as a small trading post in 1842 on a compatatively<br />
treeless island of 29 square miles in area. Soon forest and amenity trees were being<br />
planted and the vegetation protected against woodcutting and against fire during<br />
the dry winter months. A Botanical and <strong>Forestry</strong> Department was founded in 1880<br />
and the thriving plantations were systematically managed.<br />
The 365-square mile New Territories was leased in 1898 but before this the<br />
villagers had considerable areas of forest on which they depended for fuel and<br />
small timber. Government amenity planting and afforestation work in the New<br />
Territories started in 1900.<br />
During the Pacific conflict and just after, 1941-46, woodland destruction was<br />
great, causing fuel shortages and soil erosion. Re-afforestation produced about<br />
12,000 acres of plantations, in spite of difficult topograp'hical, soil and fire problems.<br />
The pop'ulation increased to over 2 millions in 1950, 3 millions in 1960 and 4<br />
millions in 1970. Forme'r villages became large to,wns, waterworks catchments<br />
gradually embraced most upland areas and with a more sop'histicated economy the<br />
need for wood fuel disappeared almost completely.<br />
Today the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division is concerned mainly with landscape conservation<br />
and recreation management. In 1970 its staff comprised three professional and<br />
eighteen technical officers, and a workforce of 400.<br />
MALAYSIA<br />
The creation of a Forest Department was first recommended in 1879. Four<br />
years later, the first Forest Department was formed under the then Superintendent<br />
of the Botanic Gardens, Singapore. However, scientific forestry in Malaya really<br />
began in 1901 with the appointment of a professional forest officer from Burma,<br />
as the Chief Forest Officer, Straits Settlements and Federated Malay States. In<br />
1915 the department was greatly expanded, but for some years afterwards organised<br />
forestry activities under trained officers extended only to the Straits Settlements<br />
and the Federated Malay States. As appreciation of the value of forest conservation<br />
spread, the protected States of !Johore (1920) and Kedah (1923) created forest<br />
departments of their own. Their example was followed by Kelantan and Brunei<br />
(Borneo) in 1933. A trained officer took charge of the forest department of the<br />
Government of Trengg,anu from the lbeginning of 1936.<br />
On the 1st January, 1935, when the policy of decentralisation in the Federated<br />
Malay States was inaugurated, each of these IStates also had its own forest<br />
department. The Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>, ihowever, by virtue of his appointment as<br />
State Forest Officer to each State, continued to exercise personal executive<br />
authority over, and was responsible for, State forest departments. In his advisory<br />
capacity and on invitation of their Governments, he also made periodical visits of<br />
inspection to the Malay States outside the Federation. This form of administration<br />
remained in force up to the time of Japanese aggression in 1941.<br />
On the liberation of this country in the latter part of 1945, a skeleton department<br />
was set up under the Britis1h Military Administration and, as more staff became<br />
available, the pre-war organisation was gradually re-established, but with more<br />
clearly defined central administration and executive authority. At this stage the<br />
Colony of Singapore was separated from the main body with independent administrative<br />
and executive authority. On resumption of Civil Government on 1st April,<br />
1946, and with the introduQtion of the Malayan Union, the trend of forest<br />
administration continued towards unity of authority and this undoubtedly contri-
SOUTH-EAST ASIA IS3<br />
consisted of a Chief Research Officer (who also- officiated as Timtber Research<br />
Officer), Silviculturist, 'Botanist and Ecologist, Mensuration Officer, Instructor,<br />
Forest School, General Assistant, Entomologist, Wood Technologist, Librarian<br />
Archivist and a Chemist. In 1952 the Timber Research Laboratory located at<br />
Sentul was move'd to Kep'o!ng and it became one with the Forest Research Institute<br />
geographically and administratively.<br />
A review of the progress of research at this stage will reveal that the herbarium<br />
contained 53,629 mounted specimens, ab'out 3,000 Malayan wood species 'were<br />
kno,wn, an arboretum containing 400 trees of Malaysian Dipterocarps established,<br />
studies on rehabilitation of degraded soils initiated and the Malayan Unifonn<br />
System of silvicultural treatment 'of the forests evolved. Forest products research<br />
also had shown impressive progress in the fields of timber mechanics, sawmilling<br />
and wood-working, wood seasoning, wood preservation, composite wood, wood<br />
anatomy and pulp and pap,er investigations. Entomological research had also kept<br />
pace with the rest. Five-y.ear research programmes had be'en initiated and the<br />
research pamphlets series started appearing in 1953.<br />
On 31st August, 1957,-the Federation of Malaya attained independence and a<br />
target date for Malayanisation of the Research Branch was set as 1965. The senior<br />
research establishment at this stage (1957) stood at ten including the Chief Research<br />
Officer. In 1962 a Forest Resources Reconnaissance Survey Section was established.<br />
1963 saw the departure of the last expatriate Chief Research Officer, who was<br />
succeeded by a Malayan officer. As scheduled, the Research Branch was completely<br />
Malayanised by 1965 which year also saw the completion and occupation<br />
of a new additional wing to the main Forest Research Institute building, a new<br />
Forest School 'building and a ne:w Chemistry Laboratory, all approved under the<br />
S,econd Malaya Development Plan. A new library building was also constructed<br />
in 1968 under the First Malaysia Development Plan. A major research project,<br />
HThe Establishment of Pilot Plantations of Quick Growing Species," was launched<br />
under the Five Year Plan, aided by the United Nations Development Programme<br />
Special Fund in 1967 with the object of growing trees to meet the needs of raw<br />
material for pulp and paper manufacutre in Malaya.<br />
With the present establishment of 24 senior officers, two foreign experts and a<br />
British volunteer, the Institute is forging ahead with its enhanced activities to meet<br />
the developmental needs of the country.<br />
SABAH<br />
(formerly North Borneo)<br />
On 16th September, 1963, Sabah became independent as a State of Malaysia.<br />
'[he Forest Department remains a State Department under the general direction<br />
of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the State Government<br />
Sabah is a large exporter of hardwood timber to, world markets, and a timber<br />
industry which is continuously expanding is full of future potentials as a major<br />
revenue earner; it is thus the mainstay of the country's eco,nomy. The timber<br />
industry comprised of twelve concessionaires and twenty-five special licences<br />
operating o'n twenty-one-year and ten-year agreements respectively. Other short<br />
term licences on Forms I and 11 were issued in State land forests mainly in clearing<br />
land for agricultural deveop'ment. The statement of production, expenditure and<br />
.income in terms of millions for 1970 was:-<br />
Production Revenue Expenditure Surplus<br />
(cu. ft. hoppus) M$ M$ M$<br />
181.9 79.5 7.6 71.9<br />
From the very b,eginning, foreigners, both European and Cbinese, were taking a<br />
hand in the exploitation, and one American firm joined in later. Native participation<br />
in the timber industry had just started during the last few years. The exploita<br />
6
154 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
tion itself is intensive. It has become very highly mechanised nowadays and with<br />
the wide application of the well-adapted chain-saw, more forest areas were logged<br />
out each year by various licensees. Loggers in flat and low-lying areas still resort<br />
to the popular tramway. In most of the less rugged and hilly region, tractor/road<br />
extraction is in use, while highlead and skyline systems are used in the more rugged<br />
areas.<br />
Sa'bah is now respected in the world market as one of th·e chief exporters of<br />
tropical hardwood. There has been a steady and marked increase of export of<br />
timber which has now formed a vital part of the national income.<br />
Sabah's best customer is Japan, taking some 66.4 per cent of all exports; Korea<br />
takes 22 per cent, Formosa 5.2 per cent, Hong Kong 4.4 per cent and Australia<br />
1.9 per cent, negligible quantities reaching such distant markets as Germany and<br />
Holland.<br />
As at 31st December, 1970, one ve-neer-plywood and three veneer plants were in<br />
operation and 140 sawmills were registered. These sawmills ranged from a large<br />
band mill to simple one-bench circular mills often powered by lorry engines. The<br />
trend of production for the veneer mills and sawmills has fluctuated considerably<br />
since 1960. It is expected that the out-turn of ve'neers and plywood will increase<br />
but the out-turn of sawn timb-er is not expected to increase for some time yet. The<br />
reason for this is that the producers prefer to export round logs, which are more<br />
profitable than converted timb-er. A large prop'ortio'n of the sawmill out-turn is<br />
disposed of for local consumption; the veneers and veneer-plywood produce are<br />
exported to Japan, United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa and America.<br />
Interest in working mangrove forest was revived in 1966 mainly for mangrove<br />
chip wood for export to Japan. Japan's pulp and paper manufacturers have shown<br />
keen interest in mangrove chips as basic material for rayon and pulp, and this new<br />
industry, which is managed 'by natives, is expected to start by the middle of the<br />
current year; a total area of approximately 500 square miles of mangrove forest<br />
has been allocated. It is envisaged that the wood will be processed in two factories<br />
on the East Coast and the chips will be exported to Japan. These projects will,<br />
no doubt, bring additional revenue to Government and assist towards more<br />
lucrative employment.<br />
Prior to World War 11 very little research work was carrie'd out due to lack of<br />
staff and funds. The little that was done was mostly botanical collecting, though<br />
a start was made on gro,wth and yield studies and small scale planting trials. In<br />
1932 the Research Branch was established. A botanist was appointed in 1953; an<br />
ecologist recruited in 1954; a plantation officer appointed in 1965 and an entomologist<br />
from the Colombo Plan joined the Branch in 1966. The Research Branch<br />
expanded considerably and in 1969 a Senior Research Officer was app,ointed to take<br />
charge of the Branch. There are now five fully qualified senior officers with a<br />
junior staff of over 70 men responsible for the implementation of an extensive<br />
research programme.<br />
The Forest Department continued to send its subordinate staff for training at<br />
Kepong Forest School, West Malaysia, and thirteen officers were sent in 1970;<br />
concurrently, two officers are undergoing training at Mara Institute- of Technology<br />
in West Malaysia; five taking Ranger's Certificate Course in Coimbatore, India;<br />
three taking a <strong>Forestry</strong> Degree in Australia, while two are taking similar courses<br />
in Canada and one in the United Kingdom. The inadequacy of technically trained<br />
staff has been the greatest impedime'nt to the effective management and development<br />
of the State's forest resources. The major bar to progress in the recruitment and<br />
training of local senior officers has been the lack of candidates with adequate basic<br />
education to matriculate at overseas universities and to a certain extent the reluctance<br />
of the local boys with the requisite qualification to take up employment in the<br />
Department. At present Forest Department junior field staff are given training in<br />
the Forest School in Sandakan. Wit'h the increase of staff in the Department these
SOUTH-EAST ASIA 155<br />
facilities are inadequate to provide the necessary training and consequently'it was<br />
proposed in the First Malaysia Plan that a Forest Training School :be established in<br />
Sandakan, and it is hoped the School would be completed by 1973 during the<br />
Second Malaysia Plan.<br />
SARAWAK<br />
Sarawak, o'n the north-west coast of Borneo, has an area of about 48,000 square<br />
miles. Trop'ical rain forest (regrettably much decimated tby shifting cultivation)<br />
covers three quarters of the land. Nearly 12,000 square miles have been constituted<br />
as p·ermanent forests. Some of th,e extensive peat-swamp forests contain valuable<br />
ramin; inland the dipterocarps predominate. Rivers dominate the landscape. The<br />
120-160 inches rainfall is generally spread throughout the year, with moderate<br />
increase during the north east monsoon du'ring from November to March. Humidity<br />
is high but temperatures are moderate. The estimated population in 1969 was<br />
945,000, made up of 314,000 'Chinese, 227,000 Malay and 404,000 others, mainly<br />
indigenous tribes. The Chinese have been responsible for nearly all the commercial<br />
development in Sarawak.<br />
When the first Rajah, James Brooke', took over in 1841, barter with China in<br />
rhinoceros horn, kingfisher feathers, bezoar stones, dammar, camphor and hornbill<br />
ivory (once more valuable than jade) was centuries old. Sta'bilised government and<br />
the growth of Singapore stimulated trading. The inland peoples, Iban, Kayan and<br />
Kenyah, relied on minor forest produce for cash whenever shifting hill-rice cultiva.<br />
tion produced no surplus. Trade at the end of the: century show'ed a meteoric rise<br />
and fall in gutta percha and a spectacular increase in jelutong. Cutch, rattans and<br />
illipe nuts were also exp,orted. '<br />
A Forest Department was established in 1919 by J. P. Mead w'ho built up a small<br />
staff for exploration and reservation under Malayan-type legislation. Progress was<br />
hindered by lack of topographical maps and almost stopped by local opposition<br />
in the early 1930s, when staff was cut from 111 to 32 under economic pressures.<br />
Modified legislation in 1934 allowed rights for hunting and collection of produce<br />
for domestic use in "protected forests," and reservation continued. Only a few<br />
hundred tons of sawn timber were exported to the United Kingdom before 1940:<br />
the high grades demanded and the minute local market prevented expansion.<br />
After the Japanese occupation (1942-45) 'the third Rajah ceded Sarawak to the<br />
Crown. Aerial photographs from the R.A.F. and finance from the C.D. & W.<br />
fund quickened forest development under first a ten- and then a five-year plan. The<br />
great expansion of ramin exports from 1949 concentrated attention on the peatswamps.<br />
An increase in trunk road construction after independence and the<br />
formation of Malaysia in 1963 helped the response to apparently insatiable Japanese<br />
timber demands from inland forests. The Department struggles to maintain<br />
systematic logging even in forests ostensibly destined for agriculture under development<br />
schemes. In 1969 2,418,000 Hoppus tons of timber were produced, of which<br />
2,128,000 tons (88 per cent) were declared to be exported. Whether o'r not this<br />
vast out-turn will be surpassed in future will be a test of policy.<br />
An P.A.O.-directed inventory of the more accessible mixed dipterocarp forests<br />
is in progress (1969-1971) and there is an agreement that areas within the inventory<br />
area will not be licensed until the F.A.O. report on forest industries development<br />
has been received and studied. Log and sawn timber grading is planned for 1971<br />
to help combat competition from Indonesia. A timber research and technical training<br />
centre was at last ope'ned in 1970, aiming at raising the standard of milling and<br />
providing more information on Sarawak timbers; some 2,500 species await attention.<br />
The Department has laboured under staff shortages Which are expected to<br />
continue, unless resistance is successful against emulation of neighbouring territories<br />
seen to be making fortunes by quick-profit policies with insufficient attention to<br />
silvicultural controls.<br />
6*
THE ISLAND TERRITORIES lS7<br />
of the island by the British. In 1879 a Forest Law was enacted providing: for the<br />
protection of forests and for the control of tree felling and the grazing of animals. The<br />
nucleus of the Forest Service was established in 1878 and foresters of French and<br />
German origin, some of them with experience in the Indian Forest Service, were<br />
assigned the task of forest management. M. Madon was appointed Principal Forest<br />
Officer in 1881. The demarcation of State Forests was made in 1884 op the basis of<br />
the Forest Delimitation Law of 1881.<br />
The organisation of the Forest Service evolved and developed over the years: in<br />
1920 Cypriot personnel was sent abroad for training in forestry, in particular at the<br />
Dean <strong>Forestry</strong> School, to man the middle and higher echelons of the Service. Efforts<br />
to free the forest estate from goat grazing were intensified but many of the actions<br />
taken towards this end appeared to the shepherds as "oppressive measures of the<br />
Colonial Power" and their reaction to thenl was often incendiarism.<br />
Intensification of Forest Management<br />
The War effort of 1939-45 diverted attention from local "forestry politics". Through<br />
intensive Public Relations efforts, coupled with economic incentives, the forests were<br />
freed from goat grazing. In 1950 a formal "Statement of Forest Policy" was published<br />
by Government. This policy document placed emphasis on: the protective functions<br />
of forests, namely climatic protection, water and soil conservation; protection to<br />
agriculture; forest reservation with a view to ensuring a prudent balance in the supply<br />
of agricultural and forest products; the use of forests as areas of public amenity and<br />
recreation and as the habitat of wildlife; the production ofraw materials for industries<br />
and the provision of employment.<br />
Education and Research<br />
In 1951, the Cyprus <strong>Forestry</strong> College was opened for the training of local staff and<br />
overseas students. The curriculum provides for a two year intensive course at the subprofessional<br />
level. In less than two decades (1951-69) 200 Cypriot and 75 overseas<br />
students graduated from the College.<br />
In 1954 a <strong>Forestry</strong> Research Division was created and was assigned the task of<br />
investigating silvicultural and general biological problems of forest production.<br />
The Development Decade<br />
Cyprus reached the "take-off" stage in the <strong>Forestry</strong> sector around 1960. By then a<br />
dynamic <strong>Forestry</strong> Organisation manned with appropriately trained Cypriot personnel<br />
at all levels, was available. Through continuous Public Relations campaigns a favourable<br />
public opinion had been created. The Government of the Cyprus Republic<br />
launched its First Five Year Development Plan in 1960. Although competition for<br />
resources among the various sectors of the Country's economy was keen, forestry<br />
had its rightful share of such resources.<br />
Future Prospects<br />
The forests of Cyprus had, have and will continue to have, a significant impact on<br />
the historical, cultural and economic evolution of the Country. They constitute an<br />
invaluable heritage which the people of Cyprus are determined to protect, develop<br />
and rationally mobilize to achieve their aspirations for economic and social advancement<br />
and for a dignified environment to live in.<br />
FIJI<br />
FIJI, A FORMER colony, was ceded to the British Crown by the Chiefs of the autochthonous<br />
Melanesian-Polynesian inhabitants in 1874; it gained its Independence and<br />
became a Dominion in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> ofNations on 10th October, 1970. It is a<br />
mqlti-racial society and almost 50 per cent of the total population of 525,000 is made<br />
up of Indians.
THE WEST INDIES<br />
BRITISH HONDURAS<br />
BRITISH HONDURAS IS the only part of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> in Central America. In the<br />
early years of the 17th century it formed a refuge for buccaneers from the Spaniards<br />
but its first settlement about 1665 and its continued occupation were due to its valuable<br />
forest produce. In 1671 the Governor of Jamaica reported that the logwood (Haematoxylon<br />
campechianum) trade "increased His Majesty's Customs and the national<br />
commerce more than any of His Majesty's colonies." Later, mahogany (Swietenia<br />
macrophylla) exploitation became more important and this is the species for which<br />
British Honduras is best known. Apart from regulations governing the size of merchantable<br />
logs and a law for the preservation of young mahogany in 1838, no attempt<br />
at any sort ofcontrol or management seems to have been made until E. D. M. Hooper<br />
recommended in 1886 the establishment of a Forest Department, which was not done.<br />
The Crown Lands Ordinance 1886 however authorised the Survey Department to issue<br />
licences to cut forest produce on Crown Lands, but apart from pre-payment of royalty<br />
and checking of numbers of stumps, there was no adequate control.<br />
In 1921, C. Hummel reported on the Forests of British Honduras, with suggestions<br />
for a far reaching forest policy and in 1922 he was appointed to take charge of a newly<br />
created Forest Department. In 1923 a Forest Ordinance vested administration and<br />
control ofthe Department and the development and management ofthe Crown forests<br />
in a Forest Trust, financed by a statutory contribution of 60 per cent of the forest<br />
revenue of the colony and a Forest Loan of 250,000 dollars.<br />
Hummel's report was the basis of the accepted forest policy of the Government, and<br />
it was revised in 1947 and again in 1954 when it was published over the signature of<br />
the Governor and emphasised the necessity to establish and preserve<br />
for all time and develop the forest estate, which, as declared Forest Reserve, now<br />
amounts to 20 per cent of the land area. Under the Forest Ordinance and its later<br />
revisions, and with adequate finance, the foundation of the forest estate was laid,<br />
protection was established and more efficient exploitation was encouraged by the<br />
granting of longer term licences and brought under more adequate, stricter control;<br />
staff and labour were recruited and trained, enumeration and mapping of the forests<br />
was given high priority and the silviculture of mahogany, cedar (Cedrela mexicana)<br />
and pine (Pinus caribaea), begun in 1922, made rapid progress. The utilisation of other<br />
woods was encouraged and the most promising were tested at Princes Risborough.<br />
Botanical collections were made, an herbarium was founded and in co-operation with<br />
Yale University and the Forest Department, the Field Museum published a Flora.<br />
Silvicultural and other research was done on the most promising secondary woods,<br />
controlled burning in pine areas, the establishment of plantations of mahogany, pine<br />
and some exotics, the use of second growth species for papermaking, the tapping of<br />
naval stores, chicle (Achras spp) and fig (Ficus spp) latex, seed collection, the improvement<br />
of local sawmiIling, encouragement of other utilisation and minor industries etc.<br />
In 1929 economic depression necessitated reduction of expenditure and staff and<br />
serious limitation ofactivities; hurricanes in 1931, 1941 and 1942 destroyed the forests<br />
where most of the silvicultural work had been done and in 1931 the Forest Trust was<br />
abolished and the statutory contribution of60 per cent offorest revenue lost to the Department.<br />
During the lean years of depression, a forest type map of the whole country<br />
was compiled from the work done previously and under Colonial Development and<br />
Welfare grant the forest associations were examined, enumerated and described in<br />
much greater detail. A commencement was also made on pine plantation and progressed<br />
well.<br />
In 1944 a Development Plan for the forests on Crown Land was prepared, and later,<br />
legislation was enacted to afford some measure of control over the exploitation of<br />
privately owned forests. In the late 1940s intensive fire protection on the Mountain<br />
160
162 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
In 1957 a large scale reafforestation,project was launched. This was made imperative<br />
as a direct answer to Hurricane Janet of 1955 which devastated over 75 per cent of tree<br />
crops on the island. Productivity is handicapped by a rugged, mountainous topography,<br />
lack of mechanisation and the dependence on foreign aid for development.<br />
Since 1957 two million board feet of timber were salvaged from hurricane-damaged<br />
areas. During the same period some 750 acres of plantations have been established<br />
using such species as: Swietenia macrophylla, Tectona grandis, Cedrela mexicana,<br />
Hibiscus elatus, Pinus caribaea and various Cupressus species. All are showing promise.<br />
GUYANA<br />
(formerly British Guiana)<br />
THE FIRST RECORDS of forestry operations in Guyana date to 1624 when there was<br />
already an established barter trade for letter-wood (Piratinera guianensis) and "Oriane<br />
dye" (annatto). Thereafter until the latter part of the 18th century, the cutting of<br />
letter-wood completely dominated the timber industry. However, by the year 1800 the<br />
export of greenheart (Ocotea rodiaei) was firmly established and it was also being<br />
used locally for framing, posts etc.-all sawn lumber being imported, mainly from<br />
Canada, as late as the last quarter of the 19th century. By 1880, there were three<br />
sawmills in the country and this number has grown slowly to 81 in 1970. Meanwhile,<br />
greenheart continued to dominate both the export trade and local use-it still accounts<br />
for some 60 per cent of the total lumber production.<br />
Through all these years, there was absolutely no control on wood-cutting operations<br />
-until 1890 when the first Crown Lands Regulations were passed. Even then control<br />
was minimal and the vicious practice of creaming (for greenheart mainly) became<br />
deeply engrained in the industry. Responsibility for the forests rested with the Commissioner<br />
of Lands and Mines who was later (1910) given a Forest Officer and some<br />
Forest Rangers as a part of the staff of the Lands Department. Despite difficulties,<br />
excellent work (e.g. forest valuations) was done by these officers but by 1925 it had<br />
become very apparent that the mere investigational work which forestry required itself<br />
demanded a full-time staff and so a Forest Department, independent of the Lands and<br />
Mines Department, was established in that year.<br />
However, control of the forest and of wood-cutting operations remained with the<br />
Commissioner of Lands until 1953-54 when the Crown Forests Ordinance and<br />
Regulations were passed. In the meanwhile, however, the Forest Department had<br />
steadily pursued a most comprehensive programme of investigation and research<br />
which included forest valuations, botanical identification and collections, physical and<br />
mechanical (strength) testing of the most abundant species, seasoning properties<br />
(together with operation of a seasoning yard), investigation of minor forest products<br />
and silvicultural research with particular reference to the regeneration of greenheart.<br />
In 1950, Government adopted a formal Statement of Forest Policy. Among other<br />
things, this policy accepted the need for integration of forestry with other land uses<br />
and asserted the further need for management on the basis of sustained yield. It also<br />
accepted the necessity for developing markets, at home and abroad, for all worthwhile<br />
species. One of the direct results of the acceptance of this policy was that the statutory<br />
control of the forests had to be vested in the Forest Department. This came about in<br />
1954 with the passing of the Forests Regulations and the gazetting of one continuous<br />
block of Crown Forests (29,000 square miles).<br />
The year also saw the first Development Plan. Assisted by grants from the Colonial<br />
Development and Welfare Scheme, several projects were put forward viz: staff<br />
training, appraisals, silvicultural research and also for the production and marketing<br />
of unknown but worthwhile species. During the ensuing years very useful work was<br />
accomplished in many sectors. By 1962, eight Guyanese had been trained overseas and<br />
had secured professional degrees in forestry, and there had been considerable training<br />
of subordinate staff. Appraisals (over limited areas)-aided by forest type mapping<br />
based upon the interpretation of aerial photographs-had clearly shown that the
THE WEST INDmS<br />
problem of securing the economic exploitation of the forests would be solved" only<br />
with the full use of all worthwhile species. At the same time, it became evident that tbe<br />
regeneration ofgreenheart, per se, though possible, would be too expensive a method of<br />
securing the continuance of the forest estate and of reaching towards sustained yield.<br />
The political problems and upheavals ofthe"early 19608 greatly hindered the development<br />
of forestry, but in the latter part of the decade, government, a.ssisted by the<br />
U.N.S.F. set about a systematic programme of surveying and assessing the forest<br />
development potential of Guyana. All aspects of forestry were included-valuations,<br />
logging and transport studies, marketing, preservation, sawmill improvement, reorganisation<br />
of the department's timber plant and feasibility studies for other woodusing<br />
industries. This project has only recently (1970) terminated and it is, unfortunately,<br />
yet too early to attempt to forecast what paths the development of forestry will pursue<br />
in the critical years which lie immediately ahead in the life of a young developing<br />
nation.<br />
JAMAICA<br />
THE TOTAL LAND area ofJamaica is 4243.6 square miles ofwhich 24 per cent is forested.<br />
However, more than 70 per cent of the forest land has been heavily creamed whilst the<br />
remaining natural forest is still comparatively inaccessible. At present, State forests<br />
occupy 274,000 acres (or 10 per cent of the land area) with about 20,000 acres in forest<br />
plantations.<br />
The Department was officially created in 1942 under the leadership of Mr. Christopher<br />
Swabey, later head of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau. Prior to this, forestry<br />
activity was concerned mainly with the reservation and demarcation of the Forest<br />
Estate and a series of investigations and reports about the dangers of deforestation<br />
dating as far back as 1886. The first ten years of the work of the Department was<br />
largely financed by a grant of £156,880 from the Colonial Development and Welfare<br />
Organisation, and included an annual afforestation programme of about 400 acres.<br />
While continuing the extension of this conservation-oriented programme, the Forest<br />
Department also fostered the birth of the Watersheds Protection Commission in 1957,<br />
which became a separate agency in 1960. Having started with one professional and 10<br />
field officers, the staff complement now provides for six professional and 40 nonprofessional<br />
officers.<br />
The early forest plantings were carried out to cover up the scars of indiscriminate<br />
deforestation caused by shifting agriculture, and have resulted in a large number of<br />
species/age classes scattered throughout the forest estate. With the attainment of<br />
political independence in 1962, a plan underlying the possible role of forestry in the<br />
development of the national economy was approved and the annual planting programme<br />
was increased to 1,600 acres in 1963 largely in an attempt ultimately to<br />
replace imported forest products, to provide job opportunities in rural areas and to<br />
increase production from land of low productivity. By 1968 this annual target was<br />
increased to 3,000 acres and 15 miles of access roads, providing casual employment for<br />
nearly 10,000 individuals in that particular year.<br />
At the same time in 1967 a five year project sponsored jointly by the Government<br />
and the United Nations Special Fund (F.A.O.) got under way to provide the necessary<br />
information on which to base long term development plans for forestry and watershed<br />
management. In general, the <strong>Forestry</strong> side of the project is concerned with detailed<br />
mapping of the Forest Estate, an inventory of natural forests and plantations, silvicultural<br />
research, feasibility studies of forest industries and the preparation of<br />
management plans for specific areas. The Watershed Management part of the programmeis<br />
providingbothdemonstrationandtraining opportunities useful in developing<br />
an island-wide programme for conserving soil and water resources in upland regions.<br />
In addition to its normal forestry activities, the Department has been providing<br />
modest recreation facilities in the scenic areas of the forest and with the recent increase
THE WEST INDmS 165<br />
is being increased by 200 annually. In 1954, enrichment planting of mixed hardwoods<br />
was started. There are 1,100 acres, increasing annually by 75.<br />
Exploitation, Trade and Industries<br />
Control of exploitation is effected either by minimum girth limits or by restricting<br />
exploitation within annually demarcated ,blocks. A swing to mechanisation i.e. from<br />
axes to power saws and from bulls to farm tractors has taken place in most of the<br />
harvesting operations.<br />
The annual yield from Government forests stands at 18.5 million bd. ft. yet Trinidad<br />
and Tobago is heavily dependent on timber imports averaging 22.5 million bd. ft. arid<br />
costing $6.5 million T.T. Export principally offurniture timbers average 0.5 million bd.<br />
ft. at a value of $200,000 T.T. '<br />
Many of the timbers which were not formerly used are now more widely accepted as<br />
a result ofadvances in science and technology and also as the forests become more and<br />
more inaccessible. There are 65 sawmills in the country. The Trinidad Match factory<br />
using Jereton (Didymopanax morototoni) consumed 84,000 cu. ft. in 1969. In 1970 a<br />
parquet tile industry utilising various local woods commenced operations. There are<br />
three preservative plants-Boliden K, Celcure and Wolman Salts. There are also<br />
several wood working industries which are manufacturing doors,windows, furniture<br />
and handicrafts. The Division also has its own sawmill, creosoting and fencing plants<br />
for the utilisation ofsmall size teak thinnings. There are no pulpmills, plywood, veneer<br />
or particle board industries.<br />
Research<br />
Most of the present research work is concentrated in the following fields:<br />
(i) Planting trials of both local and exotic species.<br />
(ii) The use of fertilisers in Teak and Pine Plantations.<br />
(Hi) Variations in Teak and Pine spacing.<br />
(iv) Tree Breeding-selection of plus trees, observations on clonal gardens, one<br />
parent progeny trials and establishment of seed orchards.<br />
(v) The effect of drainage on Teak and Pine in seasonally waterloged areas.<br />
(vi) Thinning experiments in Teak and Pines.<br />
To date, none of these have been concluded. However, investigations in 1966<br />
revealed that pine logs are very susceptible to blue stain but could be controlled by<br />
spraying with 0.1 per cent gamma B.H.C. In 1967, because of the possibility ofdisease<br />
introduction (Neetria eueurbitula) a ban was placed on the importation of live Xmas<br />
trees.<br />
Staff<br />
At present there are only five professional officers including the Conservator, :hiS<br />
Deputy and an officer on loan under U.K. Technical Assistance Scheme. The subordinate<br />
monthly paid field staff comprises 118 persons of which 11 are trained. Daily<br />
paid employees number 160 permanent labourers and approximately 550 casuals.<br />
Training<br />
In 1967 a United Nations Special Fund project to provide training for subordinate<br />
technical staff to serve Trinidad and Tobago primarily and the West Indies in general<br />
was launched. The course is for two years and a Diploma is awarded on successful<br />
completion. 12 persons have already graduated, the annual intake being six. ·Three<br />
persons pursuing professional degrees are expected in 1971 and 1973.<br />
Wildlife and Tourism<br />
Attempts are being made to re-stock Little Tobago with Paradisea apoda (Bird of<br />
Paradise) since the original number of 48 at the time of introduction had dwindled to<br />
approximately seven partly through sterility and partly through Hurricane Flora in<br />
1963. The Caroni Game Sanctuary in Trinidad has become a popular attraction both<br />
for local and oversea tourists. There are now over 12,000 Scarlet Ibis roosting in this<br />
area.
. ,<br />
FORMER COMMONWEALTH TERRITORIES<br />
PALESTINE<br />
There is evidence to show that in biblical times Palestine was well wooded. At the<br />
time ofthe Crusades accounts ofbattles make frequent reference to forests. Destruction<br />
offorest cover has been progressive throughout history and accelerated in the last one<br />
hundred years. At the commencement ofthe British Mandate in 1923 all that remained<br />
of the natural vegetation were a few pitiful grazed-down fragments barely enough to<br />
conceal the herds of goats which had been chiefly -responsible for its destruction.<br />
The Report of the Palestine Administration 1920-21 recognised the need for reforestation<br />
and protection of surviving trees and proposed the promulgation of a<br />
"Woods and Forests" Ordinance based on the Cyprus Laws. This work was initially<br />
entrusted to the staff of the Department of Agriculture.<br />
In 1926 a new Forests Ordinance was passed authorising the establishment of<br />
Forest Reserves on uncultivated land which was not private property, and providing<br />
for their protection.<br />
It was itnpossible for the Agricultural Officers to devote adequate time to the<br />
demarcation, survey and protection of Forest Reserves. In 1930 therefore a separate<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> section was set up in the Department of Agriculture and Forests. The staff<br />
of the section though hampered by lack of funds and frustrated by Land Settlement<br />
procedure, could at least concentrate on their tasks. The realisation of the ruinous<br />
condition of the hill-country was slowly gowing, and the establishment of a separate<br />
Department of Forests in 1936 seemed to indicate a determination to act on a scale<br />
more commensurate with the vastness of the problem. However, the outbreak of<br />
civil disturbances, mush more widespread and prolonged than any since the beginning<br />
of the Mandate, put a stop to hopes of expansion. From March 1936 to the summer of<br />
1939 the main "objects of management" were to protect the Reserves from encroachments<br />
and where possible the vegetation from destruction, without loss of life or limb.<br />
Efforts in these directions were more successful than might have been expected.<br />
The outbreak of World War II not unnaturally altered the position, and internal<br />
security improved. No steps were taken to import stocks of firewood from Turkey<br />
before the sea route was closed, and a great strain was put on the battered remnants<br />
of the vegetation in Palestine by military and civilian demands for firewood.<br />
During the war it proved possible to form a Soil Conservation Board, with official<br />
and unofficial members all concerned with different aspects of soil erosion and its<br />
effects. In 1941, the Flooding and Soil Erosion (Prevention) Ordinance was passed<br />
under which several specially dangerous slopes were gazetted as Special Areas and<br />
subjected to certain restrictive controls. The Tiberias Special Area came under the care<br />
ofthe Department ofForests, which was able to act effectively to prevent the repetition<br />
of recent past annual damage and occasional catastrophes.<br />
In 1945, the Public Committee for Soil Conservation, an organisation of Jewish<br />
fanners, was formed, and in three years converted almost all Jewish Agriculture to<br />
soil-conserving practices.<br />
A revised Forest Ordinance, passed in 1948, cleared up many anomalies in the old<br />
law, gave more control over private land, and in general would have proved a more<br />
effective weapon in the perpetual struggle for forest protection.<br />
By the end of the Mandate in 1948 and in spite of constant civil disturbances, the<br />
Forest Department had accomplished a great deal. Some 84,300 hectares of Forest<br />
Reserves had been gazetted of which 83 per cent had been demarcated. Unfortunately<br />
complete protection from grazing and browsing had only been extended to some 9 per<br />
cent of the area.<br />
aetween the two wars output offorest produce was restricted to firewood and small<br />
hardwood billets, chiefly oak. It is recorded that any figures would be meaningless<br />
as the amount removed illicitly always exceeded that removed legitimately. During<br />
lS6
FORMER COMMONWEALTH TERRITORIES 169<br />
in 1932. This laid down a division of function between the Department operating<br />
within the Ministry of Agriculture, and the Provincial Authorities in the Adininistration<br />
of the country's forests. The Chief Conservator became responsible for<br />
supplying the central needs of the country in timber and wood fuel to government<br />
departments and the larger towns, while the Provincial Authorities were responsible<br />
for ensuring permanent supplies of forest produce for local and village use. While<br />
the central Reserves grew in number from the outset, Provincial Reserves tended to<br />
stagnate and never became fully operative.<br />
The first major step was the inauguration of sawmilling on the Blue Nile and in<br />
the south to supply railway sleepers and a modest quantity of furniture wood, under<br />
the supervision of expatriate staff but manned entirely by Sudanese, who had to be<br />
trained from scratch. At the same time central Forest Reserves were surveyed and<br />
gazetted. At the outbreak of war the Department was well placed to meet the extraordinary<br />
demands made upon it. The sawmilling programme was increased by the<br />
installation of additional mills, the introduction of the hand sawing of railway<br />
sleepers, the organisation of animal transport to replace lorries, the use of rafts to<br />
supplement the river services and a road building programme to open up otherwise<br />
inaccessible areas. Among the projects undertaken was the erection of a Charcoal<br />
Briquetting Plant involving many experiments with differing types of pitch as binder.<br />
The demand for firewood and charcoal grew to major proportions, over 1,000 tons<br />
of the former and 250 tons of the latter being put on rail weekly, in addition to the<br />
increased local demands for domestic fuel, industry, and a busy fleet of river steamers.<br />
At the end of the war the opportunity was taken to open a Forest Rangers School<br />
at Khartoum, with members of the demobilised Sudan Defence Force as the first<br />
intake. A start was also made with sending students to Edinburgh to take the normal<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Degree.<br />
With less pressure on production, reservation and reafforestation of the acacia<br />
reserves was expanded together with the introduction of exotics, in the north by the<br />
formation of irrigated eucalyptus plantations, in the south by extended plantings of<br />
Tectona grandis on the plains and Cupressus lusitanica in the hills.<br />
The gradual replacement of woodbuming steamers by diesels lowered the dem.ands<br />
on the riverside wood stations to such an extent that the Department gave up the<br />
hire of the old stern wheeler, which for so many years had provided home and<br />
transport for the White Nile Assistant Conservator, and additionally free transport to<br />
the Game Warden for any animals, from lion downwards, being moved from the<br />
south to Khartoum and European zoos.<br />
Soil conservation was tackled with vigour by an interdepartm.ental committee,<br />
although the physical complementation was largely left in the hands of the Forest<br />
Department. Green Belts were planted and maintained round major towns and local<br />
measures were aided elsewhere. The introduction of trout from Kenya to the mountain<br />
streams of the Southern Sudan, a major administrative feat, was cheerfully<br />
undertaken.<br />
However the result of the Forest Department's efforts may best be judged by the<br />
efficiency and enthusiasm of the Sudanese who were able to carry on and expand<br />
the reservation and planting programmes. The first Sudanese Chief Conservator<br />
Kamel Shawki was appointed in 1955 immediately prior to the country becoming<br />
an Independent Republic in 1956.
BRITISH UNIVERSITIE8-DEPARTMENTS OF FORESTRY<br />
FORESTRY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AT<br />
OXFORD UNIVERSITY<br />
The School of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
THE SCHOOL of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Oxford University was opened in 1905, as a result of the<br />
closure of the Royal Indian Engineering College at Cooper's Hill near Windsor where<br />
probationers for the Indian Forest Service had been trained under Sir William<br />
Schlich for the previous 19 years. Prolonged discussions had taken place as to<br />
how and where the probationers should be trained. Schlich was emphatic that it<br />
should be at a University. Also, on account of the small numbers, it should be concentrated<br />
in one place. It was only after strong persuasion that Oxford University<br />
agreed to establish the school. Contributory factors were the strong support received<br />
from St. John's College, which not only put the facilities of Bagley Wood, which<br />
they owned, at the disposal of the School for practical work but, in 1908, provided<br />
a new building for the School adjoining the School of Rural Economy which they had<br />
also built. '<br />
Despite Schlich's strongest representations, the University was unwilling to accept<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> as a degree subject, but a Diploma was instituted, the qualifications for entry<br />
requiring a University degree. Several months' practical work on the Continent was<br />
required very much as in the Cooper's Hill days. Up to the outbreak of war in 1914,<br />
118 men had taken the Diploma, 91 of whom went to India.<br />
Schlich retired in 1919. Prior to that he had made strong representations for the<br />
endowment of a University Chair in <strong>Forestry</strong> but his wish was only fulfilled in 1919<br />
after his retirement in that year. The Professorship was attached to St. John's College<br />
at its request, and R. S. Troup, a member of the Indian Forest Service and a former<br />
pupil of Schlich (at Cooper's Hill) was elected.<br />
After the war the degree qualification for entry was waived and <strong>Forestry</strong> became a<br />
three-year Pass Degree subject, though the Diploma was continued for some years.<br />
Between 1919 and 1927 205 men passed through the school of whom 107 went to<br />
India.<br />
In 1926, India started training her own officers and recruitment from the U.K.<br />
ceased altogether in 1933. Though this caused a sudden drop in numbers, the increasing<br />
demands of the Colonial Service largely took its place. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission<br />
also sent a steady though small number of men for training.<br />
A case for making <strong>Forestry</strong> an Honours degree was put to the University in 1936<br />
but was rejected by a narrow majority.<br />
When the Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute was founded in 1924 the School of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
retained its separate organisation and administration, though most of the staff and<br />
facilities were shared. Prof. Troup was the Head of both institutions. In 1938 a fundamental<br />
change was made as the School and the Institute were amalgamated into the<br />
"Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>".<br />
The Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute<br />
At the first Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held in London in 1920, the need for an<br />
Empire centre for advanced studies and research in forestry was stressed. The proposals<br />
of the Conference were however turned down on grounds of financial stringency.<br />
The matter was however brought up again at the second Empire Conference in Canada<br />
in 1923, and backed by the findings of an Interdepartmental Committee under the<br />
Chairmanship of Lord Clinton, it was decided to establish an Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Institute at Oxford and that it should be linked with the <strong>Forestry</strong> School with Professor<br />
Troup as its first Director. Accommodation and some staff were to be shared with<br />
the School and some extra staff recruited. It actually came into being in 1924. It was<br />
supervised by a Board of Governors whose first Chairman was Lord Clinton, and<br />
170
BRITISH UNIVERSITIES-DEPARTMENTS OF FORESTRY 111<br />
financed by grants from the Colonial Office and the <strong>Forestry</strong>Commisslonancf"by<br />
contributions from Colonial and Dominion Governments.<br />
The activities ofthe Institute rapidly increased. Further accommodation soonbecaJne<br />
an urgent necessity and was provided by temporary expedients. By 1936 the administrative<br />
load on the Professor had become so heavy that in order to relieve the burden t<br />
a separate Director, Mr. J. N. Oliphant with no teaching commitments was appointed,<br />
leaving the Professor still in overall charge. However the divided responsibility was<br />
found to be so unsatisfactory, that a Committee was set up to consider the complete<br />
re-organisation of all the forestry activities within the University. As a result it was<br />
decided to amalgamate the Institute and the School into a unified Department of<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong>, and, as far as the University was concerned, the Imperial <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute<br />
ceased to exist except as the name of the building in which the new Department of<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> worked.<br />
However the functions of the School in the education of foresters for their first<br />
degree and for those proceeding to higher degrees remained as before and the Institute<br />
functions of post graduate training of Forest Officers, running special courses required<br />
for Empire forestry, collecting and disseminating information, etc. carried on as<br />
previously. Finances were also kept separate, so that in fact there was not much change<br />
except for the fact that all the staff and all the facilities ofthe Department were equally<br />
available and better coordination of activities was achieved.<br />
Professor Troup died rather suddenly in 1939 just after all this upheaval, and H. G.<br />
Champion was called from India to succeed him. He was the third in line of ex<br />
Indian Forest Service officers to fill the post, and both he and Troup had made a<br />
mark itl India as Central Silviculturists at the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun.<br />
The Department of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
The second World War had broken out by the time Champion took the chair. The<br />
new Department had hardly had time to settle down when it was disrupted by war<br />
requirements. It was still in very crowded and inconvenient accommodation, though<br />
plans for a big new building had been almost finalised and action had been taken to<br />
start raising money. As long ago as 1930, £25,000 out of a most munificent gift made<br />
by H.R. the Rajah of Sarawak for furthering Colonial interests was allocated to the<br />
Institute for a new building. Support was promised from the Rhodes and Pilgrim<br />
Trusts and some smaller donations were received. A grant of £45,000 was made by<br />
the Colonial Development and Welfare Fund bringing the total up to the estimated<br />
cost in 1938. A site in the science area in S. Parks Road had been allocated and plans<br />
had been drawn up by Sir Hubert Worthington, A.R.A so that everything was ready<br />
to begin work as soon as hostilities ceased. Costs had, in the meantime, risen and the<br />
University made good the difference between the 1938 and 1945 estimates. Meanwhile<br />
an appeal was made at the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held in London and Oxford<br />
in 1947 for gifts of timber for panelling and furnishing the Institute. This met with<br />
universal and generous response. Wood of over 60 species was received and used for<br />
panelling, flooring, doors, furniture etc. throughout the building. The building was<br />
formally opened by H.R.H. Princess Margaret on 19th October, 1950.<br />
Students were relatively few during the war but immediately after there was a big<br />
demand for forest officers for the Colonial territories and classes, both at the undergraduate<br />
and post graduate levels were full. Much new research was started and several<br />
important compilations were issued. Champion retired in 1959 after 19 very productive<br />
years in the Chair.<br />
He was succeeded by M. V. Laurie who was the last of the line ofex-Indian Forest<br />
Service officers to hold the post and who had also, been Central Silviculturist at Dehra<br />
Dun like his two predecessors. Considerable changes were taking place in the forestry<br />
scene. Many former Colonies had achieved independence and were staffing their<br />
Forest Departments with their own nationals. Several countries started training<br />
their own men notably Nigeria, New Zealand and more recently East Africa at<br />
Makerere. Numbers of undergraduates wishing to read forestry fell to uneconomic
174 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
He was appointed Lecturer in <strong>Forestry</strong> in 1912 and subsequently became Professor<br />
of <strong>Forestry</strong>-a post he held with distinction until his retirement in 1947.<br />
The Department was closed down in 1916-19 when the staff were engaged in<br />
timber acquisition work for the First World War. It was revived in 1920 when, in<br />
addition to the degree and diploma courses, several short courses were arranged for<br />
ex-Service men. From 1922 to 1945 the number of <strong>Forestry</strong> students remained<br />
remarkably steady with a total complement of 12 to 15 per year. In addition, an equal<br />
number of Agricultural students followed courses in the Department. This close-knit<br />
community, despite its small size, exerted a strong influence on the wider sphere of<br />
College activities and during the inter-war period the lists of student officials, both<br />
athletic and social, are liberally sprinkled with the names of past foresters. One may<br />
also assume, since these students attained positions of authority at home and abroad<br />
in forest enterprises, that they obtained a sound grounding in <strong>Forestry</strong> both within<br />
the College and on vacation tours in France, the New Forest and the Dean. It is<br />
rumoured that Bangor foresters became so well known to the landlady of a farm<br />
guest house in the Dean from the early twenties that she used to greet all overseas<br />
visitors with the standard query, "No pork, no beef, or no meat at all?" When under<br />
wartime conditions of rationing she mistakenly applied this question to a dark-haired,<br />
quick-witted Celt from South Wales, she received the prompt reply-"Don't worry<br />
luv, I'll eat duck or chicken."<br />
After the Second World War the number of students in the Department increased<br />
substantially and for the period 1945 to 1965 remained steady at 50-55 per year, of<br />
which about a quarter came from overseas. In 1947, Professor E. C. Mobbs was<br />
appointed to the Chair of <strong>Forestry</strong> and in 1952 an Honours degree was instituted.<br />
The Department was one of the first to have a new building in the post-war development.<br />
It was opened in 1955.<br />
The introduction of an Honours degree and the modern facilities available in the<br />
new building led to a rapid expansion in research within the Department as well as<br />
providing an impetus to the continual updating of the undergraduate courses. Later,<br />
with the addition of a General degree (with Honours classification), students were<br />
able to study other related subjects in depth, such as Economics, Entomology and<br />
Plant Biology, in conjunction with <strong>Forestry</strong>.<br />
In 1966, on Professor Mobbs' retirement, Professor S. D. Richardson was appointed<br />
to the Chair of <strong>Forestry</strong> and soon dispelled any lingering illusions that a Chair was<br />
meant for the sedentary control of committees or that <strong>Forestry</strong> was bound by the<br />
accumulated traditions ofthe past. The forests (and primitive art) offar off West Irian,<br />
Swaziland or Ghana were discussed in the Department as freely as those of nearby<br />
Gwydyr or Clocaenog; and students argued more about economic appraisals and<br />
business management than silvicultural systems.<br />
Another major step forward was taken in 1968 when the University ofWales became<br />
the first University in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> to offer an Honours degree in Wood Science.<br />
The course is designed to fill a gap in full-time education for the timber trade and woodusing<br />
industries, and the syllabus includes the three major fields of Wood as a Raw<br />
Material; Timber Utilisation; and Economics and Business Studies. The extensive<br />
alterations made to the basement of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Department have provided teaching<br />
and research facilities for wood anatomy, veneering, pulp evaluation, kiln drying,<br />
timber preservation and the mechanical and chemical study of wood. Also in 1968,<br />
the Natural Environment Research Council approved a substantial grant for the<br />
establishment of a Xylem Physiology Research Unit and the Museum was converted<br />
into research laboratories equipped with growth chambers.<br />
Relations between staff and students have always been good, and it would appear<br />
that <strong>Forestry</strong>"attracts young men who, although imbued with a spirit of independence<br />
and possessing strong personalities, express themselves in a constructive and cooperative<br />
manner. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Society, organised and run by students, has published<br />
a learned journal ("Y Coedwigwr") since 1948. In 1965 they inaugurated a three-day
176 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
would become that of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Natural Resources. Dr. C. J. Taylor acted as Head<br />
of Department until Professor J. N. Black arrived in Edinburgh in January 1964. The<br />
new Professor had been Reader in Crop Ecology at the Waite Agricultural Research<br />
Institute.<br />
In all 839 students have graduated B.Sc. (<strong>Forestry</strong>). This degree was replaced in 1966<br />
by the B.Sc. (Ecol.Sc.) with its four Honours Schools of Ecology, <strong>Forestry</strong>, Resource<br />
Management and Wildlife and Fisheries Management. Implementation of the new<br />
course was made possible by the move to a new and very well equipped building in 1968<br />
and an increase in teaching staff to 14. Teaching and the obligatory field courses aim to<br />
produce graduates with a proper appreciation of the processes controlling biological<br />
production and with a good grounding in management and economics. As specialisation,<br />
in its accepted sense, does not take place till the 4th year, the students appreciate<br />
the overall need-for co-operation in resource management and planning. At the same<br />
time there has been a big increase in postgraduate studies in the Department.<br />
THE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY,<br />
CAMBRIDGE<br />
THF FOLLOWING ACCOUNT of the short-lived School of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Cambridge (1909-33)<br />
has been compiled from information supplied by the sole surviving member of the<br />
teaching staff, Mr. E. H. B. Boulton, lecturer on timber technology. <strong>Forestry</strong> was<br />
introduced as a subject at Cambridge in 1909 in conjunction with the Department of<br />
Agriculture. Classes were held in two rented rooms in the Swiss Cafe in Benet Street.<br />
Initially tuition was given by a series of external lecturers including Dr. A. Henry,<br />
co-author of "Trees of Great Britain". The first two students were Mr. A. P. Long,<br />
later a <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioner and a Japanese. The first Reader in <strong>Forestry</strong> was<br />
Professor William Dawson from the School of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Aberdeen, appointed in<br />
1913; at Aberdeen he had held the title of Professor and although only a Reader at<br />
Cambridge continued to use the title on the grounds that "once a Professor, always a<br />
Professor". His arrival coincided with the completion ofa fine new School of<strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />
a building which up to the time of its closure was undoubtedly the finest and best<br />
equipped forestry school in Britain. (It is now the School of Geography.)<br />
At the outbreak of the 1914-18 War this new building became the headquarters of<br />
the Eastern Counties Timber Production Board under the control of the recently<br />
appointed Reader in <strong>Forestry</strong>; he was awarded the O.B.E. for this work.<br />
In 1918 the School was again opened for teaching. In the immediate post-war years<br />
ex-members of the forces were given short courses and awarded Diplomas. Normal<br />
entrants took a three-year Pass Degree, not entirely a satisfactory arrangement as the<br />
Colonial Office, at that time the biggest recruiting agency, required candidates to take<br />
a Post-Graduate fourth year at Oxford. Meanwhile in 1922 the Cambridge Diploma<br />
as a short course was abolished and replaced by a Diploma requiring fourth year<br />
studies and a thesis.<br />
The School of <strong>Forestry</strong> building is worthy of mention. Every room, corridor and<br />
classroom featured some special timber. The Reader's room was panelled in Brown<br />
Oak with Yew block flooring. The laboratory benches were all in Pyinkadu, then a<br />
comparatively unknown timber, the preparation and fitting of which was all done<br />
personally by Mr. BOldton and the late Mr. H. A. Cox. In the basement ofthe building<br />
was a complete workshop with circular saws, planers, four-cutters and a lathe. The two<br />
teaching floors provided lecture rooms, library, laboratory and staff rooms. A third<br />
floor provided accommodation for miscellaneous exhibits.<br />
The School's timber collection at the time of "dissolution" amounted to 3,600<br />
specimens cut in four foot planks mounted on dowels, all with matching hand<br />
specimens. This collection had been started by Mr. Herbert Stone, a famous character<br />
who delivered his lectures on timber in a skull cap, puffing clouds of smoke over his<br />
classes from a large cherrywood pipe. On the closure of the School this timber collection<br />
was divided equally between F.P.R.L., Princes Risborough and The City ofLondon
BRITISH UNIVERSITIES-DEPARTMENTS OF FORESTRY 171<br />
College. The Princes Risborough share is still intact, the City of London College share<br />
was destroyed in the Blitz.<br />
A visiting lecturer worthy of mention 'was Mr. Warburton, Entomology, who died<br />
quite recently at the great age of 105. In the interests of science he once permitted a<br />
warble fly to deposit an egg on his wrist, some months later the warble had to be<br />
removed from the back of his throat under an anaesthetic.<br />
In the late twenties came the Great Depression, Colonial Office recruitment came to<br />
a standstill, the I.F.S. had embarked on Indianisation, grants ceased and as the Schooi<br />
received no finance from the University Chest the writing was on the wall. The School<br />
closed in 1933.<br />
In retrospect it is doubtful whether the continuation of the School would have been<br />
justified bearing in mind the fact that Oxford had been chosen as the site for the<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute.<br />
Cambridge can claim to have been the forerunner in the teaching of timber<br />
technology and for that, if nothing else, its brief existence was justified. The inaugural<br />
meeting of the International Association of Wood Anatomists was held at the School<br />
in' 1924 under the Chairmanship of Mr. Boulton, founder.Jllembers including Jean<br />
Collardet of Ecole de Bois, Paris, Professor Record of Yale, Dr. Swain and Dr:<br />
Oadswell of Australia, Dr. Rendle of F.P.R.L. and Dr. Chalk of Oxford. The School<br />
of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Cambridge can' also claim to be responsible for the first teaching ofTimber<br />
Technology to the Trade with the initiation of evening classes ·given by Mr. Boulton<br />
at The City of London College. Mr. Boulton was later to be responsible for the setting<br />
up of the Institute of Wood Science and the Timber Development Association.<br />
The Cambridge tradition did not die with the closure of the School. Graduates from<br />
Cambridge were to hold high positions in their profession in many lands..Here, in<br />
Britain E. C. Mobbs and M. V. Laurie both of Cambridge were later to become<br />
Professors of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Bangor and Oxford respectively.<br />
7
180 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
the industries it serves. This re-orientation of the work of the Laboratory has been<br />
assisted by an internal re-organisation which took place in 1968. In place of the former<br />
sections there are now seven research groups and an information group, falling in<br />
three Divisions (Structures and Building, Production and Processing, Preservation).<br />
One effect of the re-organisation has been to bring scientists and engineers together<br />
more closely in dealing with subjects in which they have a common interest.<br />
A further rearrangement of Government departments took place in 1970, leading<br />
to the disbandment of the Ministry of Technology and the transfer of the Laboratory<br />
to the newly formed Department of the Environment. This emphasises the important<br />
ties which exist between the Laboratory and the construction industry, which provides<br />
the largest single outlet for wood and wood products. It underlines also the Laboratory's<br />
concern with codes and standards for use and protection of wood, a material whose<br />
performance is very significant in the human environment.<br />
It is not possible in a sh,ort article to list the achievements of the Laboratory. In the<br />
course of over 40 years there have been a number of notable advances, but its main<br />
strength lies in the depth ofinformation that is available on all aspects of the utilisation<br />
ofwood and in the steady progress that has been made in achieving a better understanding<br />
ofthe fundamental properties ofwood, learning more about its technical behaviour,<br />
and developing processes, machinery and materials for its more efficient utilisation. In<br />
this note we have looked backwards and traced briefly the development of the<br />
Laboratory from its foundation to the present time. The Laboratory is not, however, a<br />
backward-looking but a forward-looking organisation and this is well expressed in the<br />
theme of Open Days to be held in 1971-Timber Today and Tomorrow.<br />
Acknowledgement: This paper is published by permission of the Department of the<br />
Environment.
FORESTRY ADVISERS<br />
No 'historical record of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Association w()1;1ld ,be<br />
complete without some reference, 'however brief, to the post of <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser.<br />
Originally created 'in 1941 and designated <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser to the Secretary of<br />
State for the Colonies, the title was successively changed to <strong>Forestry</strong> Adviser to the<br />
Minister of the Department of Technical Co-operation; to the Minister of Overseas<br />
Development and, finally, to the Minister of the Overseas Development Administra.<br />
tion of the Foreign and <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Office. .'<br />
The connection 'between the <strong>Forestry</strong> Advisers and the Association is not far to<br />
see:k; the first holder of the post, the late W. A. Ro·bertson, had been an editor of<br />
the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal. All holders of the post have been members of the<br />
Governing Council and the Executive Committee and as such played a big part in<br />
framing the destinies of the Associatio·n.<br />
As mentioned, the first 'holder of the post was W. A. RO'bertson, one of ,the last<br />
batch of students to join the Indian Forest Service from Coopers Hill. Retiring<br />
from Burma in 1932, he firstly edited the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal and in 1933 was<br />
appointed Director, F.P.R.L. at Princes Risborough, a post he held until 1945,<br />
during the last four years of which he also undertook the duties of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Adviser to the Secretary of State for the Colonies in an honorary capacity. From<br />
1945 to 1950 he devoted all his energies to the post of Adviser and it was during<br />
these post-war years when he travelled extensIvely that 'he became well known to<br />
mem'bers of the Colonial Forest Service. Retiring on reaching the age limit in<br />
1950, 'he continued as an active member of the Governing' Council until 1963 and<br />
was a regular attender at all meetings of the Association.<br />
The choice of a successor to Robertson was Frank Collier, a member of the<br />
C.F.S. and recently retired as Chief Conservator, Nigeria. Although best known<br />
as a sportsman and naturalist, Collier had made his mark on West African forestry<br />
during his 28 years in Nigeria and if the Indian tradition was to be broken he was<br />
the obvious choice. Collier in turn during 'his six years in office toured widely and<br />
became well kno'wn to officers of :the C.F.S. Ill-health forced him to relinquish the<br />
post earlier than he mig'ht otherwise have done.<br />
The next holder of the post was Christopher Swabey, than whom no one had a<br />
wider kno,wledge of Colonial territories; he had served in four countries and been<br />
head of three services. Like his predecessors 'he toured widely and in addit'ion held<br />
the distinction of being appointed Chairman of the VlIIth <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Conference held in East Africa in 1962. A noteworthy innovation during Swabey's<br />
tenure of office was the Adviser's Newsletter whereby serving officers were kept in<br />
to'uch with developme,nts in other territories. In 1965 he vacated the post to take<br />
over the Directorship of the Commonweatl1h <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau, Oxford, from whic·h<br />
he has recently retired.<br />
On Swabey's relinquishing the post he was succeeded by W. E. M. Logan who<br />
a few years earlier 'had succeeded him as Chief Conservator, Uganda. Logan only<br />
remained in the post a matter of three years, finding world travel and commuting<br />
to London from his home in Bucking'h1amshire conflicted with his farming ambitions.<br />
In 1968 John Wyatt-Smith succeeded Logan as Adviser. Wyatt-Smith had<br />
joined the Malayan Forest Servlice in 1939; apart from a brief spell in Nigeria<br />
1942-44 all his service was in Malaya. He left Malaya in 1963, shortly after<br />
Independe'nce, with the rank of Conservator and as Silvicul:turist at the Forest<br />
Research Institute at Kepong. On leaving Malaya he held an F.A.D. appointment<br />
as Professor of <strong>Forestry</strong> at the newly forme'd Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University<br />
of Ibadan, Nigeria, until succeeding Logan in 1968.<br />
181
182 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Five Advisers in the short space -of thirty years have brought to bear on <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> the traditions and forestry knowledge of the Indian Forest<br />
Service,_ West Africa, the West Indies, East Africa and now Malaysia with its<br />
unique Dipterocarp silviculture.
FORTY-NINTH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING·.:--.]UBILEE YEAR 185<br />
developments within the Association during. the past few years which has givoll·;me<br />
particular satisfaction, it is a< development which should prove of inestimable. value<br />
to the Association during the years ahead. A development which will I hope embrace<br />
not only those in this.country but throughout the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>; .but I am now in<br />
danger of trespassing on the ground to be covered by the Editor/Secretary; I'shall<br />
listen with considerable interest to his views on the future development of the<br />
Association.<br />
As members will be aware, our Patron is Her Majesty the Queen. On such occasions<br />
as a Golden Jubilee it is customary to send Her Majesty a Loyal Message; this I have<br />
done on your behalf, it is quite brief, I will read it to you: (See page 89).<br />
In reply the following gracious message has been received from Her Majesty (See<br />
page 89).<br />
Before closing there remains one brief duty on a rather sad note..Since our meeting<br />
last year death has removed CoL W. F. Chipp from our midst and I think it is<br />
appropriate to pay a brief tribute to his memory. Col. Chipp had a brilliant record in<br />
two World Wars;' to us he was our librarian for twenty-one years. His biography<br />
appeared in a recent copy of the <strong>Review</strong>. To that I can only add a comment from one<br />
of our members. "He was a fine old Warrior, the like of whom we seldom see".<br />
Ladies and Gentlemen, in conclusion I commend to you the future success and<br />
prosperity of the Association.<br />
I now invite the Chairman to present the Annual Report'of the Governing Council.<br />
The Chairman, Sir Arthur Gosling, then presented the annual report of the<br />
Governing Council. As all members had received a printed copy of this report he<br />
contented himself with brief reference to highlights of the year. Of major importance<br />
was the continuing satisfactory financial situation which revealed a· surplus of £774.<br />
The membership position again showed a net increase in membership but there was<br />
considerable scope for improvement. The unfortunate "loss" situation on the Schlich<br />
Memorial Fund had been faced and this investment transferred to a dated stock which<br />
would in due course enable the Fund to recoup some of the loss. The adoption of the<br />
report was moved by Sir Stuart Mallinson, seconded by Dr. H. C. Dawkins.<br />
Election of Honorary Life Members<br />
The Executive Committee had nominated the following members for election by<br />
the Annual General Meeting as Honorary Life Members to mark the occasion of the<br />
Association's Golden Jubilee. The Chairman said a few words about each recipient<br />
of this honour.<br />
Sir Harry Champion<br />
Sir Harry was too well-known to the forestry world to need any introduction. He<br />
had at all times been a keen supporter of the Association and taken a prominent<br />
part in all policy framing.<br />
Mr. J. B. Clements<br />
Mr. Clements was the solve surviving founder member of the Association. Retiring<br />
as ChiefConservator ofForests, Nyasaland, he was now enjoying retirement in Devon.<br />
Mr. H. R. MacMillan<br />
:Mr. MacMillan was the Chairman of the Canadian firm MacMillan BloedelLitnited<br />
and had done a great deal to further the Association's interests in Canada. Prior to<br />
his career in the timber trade Mr. MacMillan had been a forest Officer in British<br />
Columbia.<br />
On the proposal of the Chairman these elections were carried unanimously.<br />
Election of Members, to the Governing Council<br />
The following mem,bers of the Governing Council were re-elected: Abdul Majid<br />
Bin Haji Mohamed Shahid, Sir Harry Champion, Messrs. W. E. M. Logan, ,R. G.
By APPOINTMENT<br />
To HER. MAJESTY THE QUEEN<br />
PRINTERS AND STATIONERS<br />
OXLEY &. SON (WINDSOR) LTD.<br />
2-4 VICtORIA STREETt WINDSOR
192 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
A. L. Poole<br />
of photographs of animals in the wild and compiled under Lindsay Poole's direction.<br />
Intensive development of forestry and forest industries in New Zealand since the<br />
1950 has made oversea inspections by senior forestry officer increasingly necessary
A. L. POOLE 193<br />
and has also created a demand for access to their expertise in manipulating man-made<br />
forests. Lindsay Poole has participated prominently both in weighing up developments<br />
overseas and as a leader in deliberations of international technical aid organisations<br />
in various parts of the world.<br />
As to policy, the Forest Service under Lindsay Poole has followed the recommendation<br />
in his book'<strong>Forestry</strong> in New Zealand:<br />
"Although forestry practice n1ust be flexible enough to be able to adjust to<br />
worthwhile changes, it must not be so susceptible to alteration as to be overthrown<br />
or harmed either by design or by the indirect results of self-interested<br />
action of business and industry."<br />
Perhaps one of the major achievements of Lindsay Poole's era has been the<br />
rationalisation of the Forest Service. He has made forest management, in its broadest<br />
sense of the word, the central theme of the department's organisation. Planning,<br />
including preparation of the forestry planning model, the development of forest<br />
working plans and on a broader scale, regional planning, has received great emphasis..f!<br />
Much weight is now given to the economics of forestry, particularly the economic<br />
analysis of alternatives.<br />
Planting, increased in Entrican's time, has been greatly accelerated in recent years,<br />
backed by an awakened interest in afforestation shown by private companies, local<br />
bodies, private individuals, and general support by the public, which sees forestry<br />
development as one of the main alternatives to over-dependence on farming production.<br />
This has led to an expansion in forestry extension work by the department.<br />
With the increase in planting over the years there has been a parallel rise in the<br />
number of forests being utilised. Leasing of land for afforestation and efficient conversion<br />
provisos for long-term sales of timber from State forests have also been a<br />
feature of this period.<br />
Emphasis has not been solely on managemel1t and planning; greater importance<br />
has also been attached to the role of the Utilisation Development Division and to the<br />
varied work carried out by the Forest Research Institute. For the latter, advisory<br />
.committees including representatives of commercial interests have been established<br />
to assist in determining priorities in research.<br />
Lindsay Poole has directed the Forest Service towards positive steps in recreational<br />
use of forests including the establishment of forest parks, the development of amenity<br />
planting and picnic sites, and especially the adoption of a policy of managing all<br />
State forests on multiple-use principles, a concept now being taken up by large<br />
afforestation companies.<br />
The <strong>Forestry</strong> Development Conference, held in February 1969 to review the role of<br />
forestry and the forest industries and to indicate their potential, must rank as one<br />
of the highlights of Lindsay Poole's career. Of the 176 recommendations referred to<br />
the <strong>Forestry</strong> Development Council-a permanent body arising from the Conference<br />
105 recommendations have been implemented, 14partiallyimplemented, 3 not accepted,<br />
3 deferred; 51 still under action. These recommendations have set a pattern for important<br />
aspects offorestry in future.<br />
Lindsay Poole, an authority on New Zealand beeches (Nothofagus spp.) is the author<br />
of many scientific papers on botany, ecology, and forestry. He has always been an<br />
eminent proponent of the protection of natural resources, which in New Zealand<br />
context is closely related to proper appreciatiol1 of the need to control introduced<br />
animals that can so seriously deplete protective vegetation.<br />
His wide interests have been recognised by his being elected to the presidency of the<br />
Wellington Branch of the Royal Society of New Zealand, the New Zealand InstItute<br />
of Foresters, the New Zealand Ecological Society, and the Wellington Botanical<br />
Society. In recognition of his services to science in New Zealand he was made a<br />
Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand in 1962.<br />
Retirement for Lindsay Poole will be in name only, for it is unlikely that he will be<br />
content to spend all his time on his principal hobby, golf, for which he once had a 4
194 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
handicap and the basic skills to become a champion. Foresters are rarely able to cut<br />
themselves off from. their work in retirement; Lindsay Poole is to move into a wider<br />
field as'chairman ofthe Soil Conservation and River Control Council, the first forester<br />
to hold this position. This is singular recognition ofhis attributes and ofthe importance<br />
offorestry expertise in the solution of soil and water conservation.<br />
Lindsay Poole was awarded the C.B.E. in the 1971 New Year Honours list for<br />
services to forestry. A fitting climax to an outstanding career.
NOTES AND COMMENTS 205<br />
Canadair aircraft in action.<br />
Pho,to by Canad'ian Courier
210 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
dramatic appeals for assistance in an all-out caIIljpaJign to contain the encroaching<br />
desert Iby crash re-afforestation programmes."<br />
"One of the 'best ways of protecting forests from fires is deliberately to set<br />
them alight. This piece of a'dvice was offered by Dr. C. S. Cree, Chief of the<br />
Timber Supply Econo,mics Branch in the <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau of<br />
Canberra. He declared that delibera,te and carefully controlled fires lit in<br />
specific areas of the forest, to burn off 'highly inflanuna:ble un'derbus'h, could<br />
eliminate the danger of raging, uncontrolled fires in the future."<br />
"Mr. R. C. Son.;, Inspector-General of Forests, India, forecast that wood was<br />
going to be as important as grain to humanity in the future. He advocated a<br />
world-wide crash programme within the next decade. He was supported by<br />
delegates who suggeste-d inter alia: the afforestation of new areas, the improvement<br />
of tree species through genetic selection, e",pansion of ,man-made forests,<br />
better fire protection and pest control and improved utilisation."<br />
"In another paper Mr. Soni enlarged on the importance of greater -exploitati:on<br />
of minor forest products."<br />
All the above items are by no means new, they have been aired in one form<br />
or another at earlier W,orld Congresses 'and in our own <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Conferences.<br />
An even -bigger problem is that of converting theory into practice. One<br />
can only hope that the vario·us delegates will be able to convince their respective<br />
G,overnments of the urgency of the pr'oblems.<br />
In addition to purely forestry problems the Committee also touched on various<br />
wildlife problems, in particular the unfortunate aftermath of the persistent hunting<br />
of the larger cats to meet the demands of the fur trade.<br />
Mr. J. S. Sawye'rr, Chief Conservator, Sierra Leo,ne, reported large increases<br />
in the monkey population due to the disappearance of the leopard; in particular<br />
he referred to the grey vervet m-onkey which was seriously menacing farm crops.<br />
Senor Federico B:ascope, Chief of Bolivia's Forest Service, revealed a similar<br />
state of affairs when 'he told the followin'g story:<br />
Eight years ago, 600 people in the village of San Ramo-n, in Beni state, deep in<br />
the Bolivian jungle, died of a strange disease. The p-uzzled Bolivian authorities<br />
appealed to the American Institute for Tropical Diseases in Panama, which sent<br />
a party of doctors and researchers to, San Ramon. The American researchers, who<br />
stayed two years, diagnosed haem,orrhagic fever, an extremely dangerous disease,<br />
which is widespread in small mammals. It had most probably been brought into<br />
the village by the numerous rats, mice and other rodents which infested lit.<br />
Further investigations revealed that the unusual number of rodents both in the<br />
village and in the jungles around it was probably caused b'y a sharp decrease !in<br />
the number of their natural predators such as jaguars, wildcats, pumas and ocelots.<br />
Once a'bundant in the jungles of the region, these felines are now almost extinct<br />
because of constant and ruthless hunting boy the local people who sell the skins to<br />
traders from abroad.<br />
W Id P I d ON MAY 11TH in Rome F.A.O. held its Second Consultation on<br />
or<br />
nU p and World Pulp and Paper Demand, Supply and Trade. Participants<br />
Paper<br />
eman<br />
from 21 countrIes<br />
·<br />
were told that paper and paperbo:ard consumption<br />
may more than do'uble from 123 million tons in 1969 to 285 million tons<br />
in 1985. Assistant Director-Ge-neral of F.A.O.'s <strong>Forestry</strong> Departme,nt, Dr. B. K.<br />
Sleenberg, forecast that this development would afford developing c,ountries opportunities<br />
to expand their industrial base.<br />
Aff tati IN THE SEPTEMBER 1970 issue ·of the <strong>Review</strong> in "News of Mem-<br />
:es d oD bers" we published a brief account of afforestation work around<br />
Khacx:n Khartoum being carried out on the advice of Mr. A. H. Stein.<br />
r oum FA.D. forester. Mr. Stein has now spent ten years in the Sudan<br />
and his activities were recently the subject of a special F.A.O. Press Release, the
3*<br />
NOTES AND COMMENTS 213<br />
A close-up of the New Inertia Gun for Quick Forests.<br />
Photo by Georgia Pacific<br />
will reach an output of 75,000 cubic metres in 1972. This is more than current<br />
total capacity for constructional plywood in Swe'den.<br />
Vanerskog, w'hose 24,000 members own well over two million .acres of pro'ductive<br />
forest land, has grouped its industries under the name of Skogsagarnas Vaner-
OBITUARIES<br />
R. M. Gorrie, I.F.S.<br />
Robert Maclagen Gorrie died at his home in Edinburgh at the age of73 on 21st December<br />
1970. In 1923 he married Sydney Easterbrook and they spent most of their time<br />
together in India. Gorrie joined the Scottish Horse in 1914 when he was 17 and when<br />
the regiment was merged with the Cyclist Corps, unwilling to serve with what was<br />
popularly called the "gas-pipe cavalry", he joined the Gunners: he was commissioned<br />
in 1915 and served in France for much of the Great War.<br />
After the war Gorrie studied forestry at Edinburgh University, obtaining his B.Sc.<br />
in 1922 (D.Sc. in 1930) and in the same year he went to India in the Indian Forest<br />
Service, and was posted to the Punjab. He held charge of divisions which allowed him<br />
to study forests ofevery type in the province and one of these was Hoshiarur where a<br />
serious erosion problem existed, and it may well have been here that in his mind was<br />
sown the seed which grew to make him probably the first person in India to recognise<br />
the dire need for erosion control.<br />
He held several other appointments, such as Lecturer at the Forest College, Dehra<br />
Dun and P.A. to the Inspector General of Forests; during this time he edited the<br />
Indian Forester. But foremost in his mind was the need to tackle erosion; and in 1934,<br />
on a Leverhulme Research Fellowship, Bob Gorrie went to the D.S.A. to learn all<br />
he could on the subject.<br />
Now he was able to go ahead with his own plans for the Punjab, and it was not<br />
long before he was propounding through every medium possible, both the policy and<br />
techniques of erosion control with almost religious fervour. Ignoring the friendly<br />
ridicule of some of his brother officers, he set out to convert both the' administration<br />
and the public to his ideas, and he succeeded.<br />
In the early 1940s he helped to organise a Soil Conservation Circle of which he held<br />
charge as Conservator until 1947. Gorrie stayed on in West Pakistan until 1949<br />
advising the new Government on erosion matters, and then spent three years in Ceylon<br />
drawing up a Soil Erosion Act. Later he went on various assignments, all connected<br />
with erosion, in Turkey, Iran and Iraq, and again to West Pakistan where dams were<br />
being constructed on some of the great rivers. He had done all that was humanly<br />
possible to achieve his aspirations.<br />
He came home and devoted his energies to Scottish affairs, among which were,<br />
editor of The Scottish <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal, and chairman of "The Association for the<br />
Preservation of Rural Scotland".<br />
Bob Gorrie was a man of great singleness of purpose and indefatigable energy,<br />
ruthfully it can be said of him that in his field of activity, he left the world a better<br />
lace than he found it. Heleaves behindhis widow and two sons anda daughter; to them<br />
\ e send our most sincere sympathies.<br />
A.P.F.H.<br />
Ralph Ronald Waterer C.B.E.<br />
Ronald Waterer's many friends will have learnt with profound dismay of his<br />
untimely death on the 8th January 1971. He was killed instantaneously in a motor car<br />
accident: his son-in-law, Lt.-Colonel John Swift, who was driving the car at the time<br />
was also killed.<br />
Born in 1902 he was educated at Clayesmore School and Clare College, Cambridge,<br />
where he studied for a degree in Agriculture. Subsequently he switched over to <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
and was awarded his degree in 1927. At Cambridge his principal recreation was<br />
rowing, and when he moved to Oxford for his post-graduate year at the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute he not only rowed in the Brasenose College 1st Eight, but<br />
gained a place in the University trial eights. Although he failed to win his "blue" he<br />
was elected a member of the Leander Rowing Club.<br />
In 1928 he was appointed to the Colonial Forest Service and was posted to Cyprus<br />
216
OBITUARIES<br />
where he served for some 23 years. He held the post of Conservator of Forests for the<br />
last 15 years of this spell and was created a C.B.E. in 1945. It was probably for his<br />
achievements in Cyprus that he was best known. There he became a legend in his<br />
lifetime. Inspiring a splendid team, he succeeded in eradicating from the forests the<br />
free-ranging goat, an essential, though seemingly impossible, preliminary to the<br />
development which he energetically pursued. By fairness and patient diplomacy he<br />
won round the villagers.<br />
A splendid shot, he was also a keen conservationist of wild life, long before that<br />
attitude became commonplace. In wartime though heavily engaged in war effort in<br />
his civilian capacity he participated in daring exploits in occupied territory.<br />
When the post of Conservator of Forests, Kenya, became vacant at the end of 1950<br />
Ronald was offered and accepted this post, and he arrived in Kenya in March 1951.<br />
His service as Conservator of Forests (subsequently Chief Conservator), Kenya<br />
spanned the period of the Mau Mau rebellion, when normal forest activities were<br />
disrupted over most of the Eastern Conservancy. However he brought a fresh outlook<br />
and new ideas to the forestry problems of Kenya, more particularly in connection<br />
with the construction and expansion of the road system within the Forest Reserves<br />
and in stressing the importance of the wooded mountain slopes for the preservation<br />
of stream flow. The lessons he had learned in Cyprus applied to Kenya almost as<br />
vitally. His best remembered dictum was that the most valuable product of any<br />
forested land was water. He also showed intense interest in the wild life of Kenya, and<br />
as an ex-officio Trustee of the Kenya National Parks he was able to make a useful<br />
contribution towards ensuring the preservation of the country's wild animals.<br />
In 1952 Ronald attended the 6th <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conference in Canada,<br />
and in 1957, on the eve of his retirement, he headed the Kenya delegation to the 7th<br />
Conference in Australia and New Zealand, after first undertaking a pre-Conference<br />
tour in Malaya. These three and a half months of touring were not only his swan-song<br />
in his forestry career but were a period when he was seen at his very best. The contribution<br />
which he made to the proceedings, both professionally and socially were very<br />
substantial. In addition he wrote a treatise, with much valuable comment and advice,<br />
on the problems of erosion in the South Island of New Zealand.<br />
Ronald was a man with both charm and tolerance, he inspired devoted support from<br />
those who served under him. But he was also forthright in purpose and having made<br />
up his mind he allowed nothing to deter him from his objective. He had a ready sense<br />
ofthe humorous and his friendly manner inspired confidence and good companionship.<br />
On retirement he was content to take root once more in his home county, taking up<br />
farming and the pursuits of an English country gentleman.<br />
To his widow, Nora, and daughter, Brenda, who lost her husband as well as her<br />
father, all who knew them will wish to extend their deepest sympathy.<br />
C. R. C. Donald<br />
E. T. Honore<br />
G. W. Chapman<br />
Donald McCo11<br />
A 52-year association with the forest products industry came to a close in January<br />
with the passing oflogging pioneer, Don McCo11 at his home in Surrey where he retired<br />
in 1965.<br />
With a degree in forestry from Washington University, Scottish-born Mr. McCo11<br />
joined Bloedel Stewart & Welch in 1919, then became a logging engineer at Union<br />
Bay and Myrtle Point in 1922. Later he was a logging operator for Byle & Groves at<br />
Port Alberni, then joined Alberni Pacific in 1929 as logging foreman.<br />
In 1931 the company was taken over by MacMillan Export and Mr. McCo11 became<br />
logging engineer in charge of construction and development, then logging general<br />
superintendent and logging manager. From 1950 he spent two years as a logging<br />
consultant, then became vice-president of timber and a director ofTahsis Co. until his<br />
retirement.<br />
217
218 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
He was past-president of Pacific J.,ogging Congress and the B.C. Loggers Organisation.<br />
During his 46 years in the industry he developed several logging methods that<br />
are still in use. B·· h C l b· L b F b 1971<br />
rltls 0 um la um erman, e ruary,<br />
J. A. WllSOD, I.F.S.<br />
J. A. Wilson passed away on 3rd May 1971. "Billy" Wilson as he was always known<br />
joined the I.F.S. after graduating from Cambridge in 1922 and was posted to Madras<br />
Presidency. All his career was spent in Madras where he held various territorial and<br />
specialist posts with equal competence. He was at one time senior instructor at the<br />
Madras Forest College, Coimbatore. For several years he was attached to the logging<br />
and sawmilling team organised by American experts to the reciprocal advantage of<br />
both parties. He was a most cheerful companion and always ready to go out of his<br />
way to be helpful. J M M S t<br />
. . . wee.<br />
Gerald Hoyte Hocking<br />
Gerald Hocking's career in forestry was many things, and a story ofreal ahievement.<br />
He was known first to the writer as a quiet, unassuming youth fresh from Wanganui<br />
Collegiate School who began studying for a degree at the Canterbury School of<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> in 1927. Academically well equipped, he took his degree in the minimum four<br />
years; and his farming background made him a top-notch field man with axe or<br />
slasher, compass, chain or horse, the working tools of the junior forester forty years<br />
ago. Later, Hocking was in his day one of the "young Turks" offorestry, who did not<br />
believe-and said so in no uncertain terms-that working as a labourer in a relief<br />
camp at Hanmer Forest was giving himself and the country an adequate return from<br />
his professional training.<br />
Hocking's next step was to the Forest Service Head Office in Wellington where,<br />
still with labourer's status, he was general factotum to the ChiefInspector, C. M. Smith,<br />
for two years. As an earlier incumbent of the same exalted office, one can vouch for<br />
'the educative value of that experience.<br />
Promoted in 1935 to the dizzy heights offorest guard, that "dodoclass" staff group<br />
which was later translated to the foreman-ranger category, Hocking worked in the<br />
Ohakune district until a breakdown in health forced his retirement from the forestry<br />
scene for over five years. Only those who knew him during that period will be aware of<br />
the fortitude, albeit with no great patience, he showed throughout his protracted illness;<br />
nor could one cease to admire the hard work, both physical and intellectual, he later<br />
contributed to the cause of forestry, despite severe and permanent limitations.<br />
Pronounced fit to return to duty in 1943, Hocking spent practically the whole of<br />
his remaining career, stationed at Palmerston North where he became, by unanimous<br />
if unspoken consent, "Mr. Wellington Conservancy". His knowledge of his own<br />
Conservancy, its people, its resources, its potential and its needs was encyclopaedic;<br />
and memorials to Gerald Hocking will long remain standing in truly "permanent<br />
materials"-forests of his own creating.<br />
Probably on the basis that the only way to get an unpopular job done is to "ask a<br />
busy man", Hocking inevitably became editor of the New Zealand Journal of<strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />
holding that post from 1943 to 1951. During that era the forestry profession was almost<br />
clam-like in the literary sense, and his contributions, both in editorial and in editorship,<br />
were outstanding. He was also the New Zealand representative at the British <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Conference held in Canada in 1952, an assignment that could well<br />
have daunted lesser men in his position.<br />
Gerald Hocking retired. from the Forest Service at the end of 1968, and died at<br />
Pahnerston North on 17th September last. The sympathy of all who knew him will<br />
gotohiswidow, June, hersonandtwo daughters. He was a manwho achieved much, inno<br />
easy circumstances, and one who will hold a place of respect and affection-and admiration<br />
yes-in the hearts and minds of his contemporaries and colleagues while<br />
life lasts. D K d<br />
. enne y.
OBITUARIES<br />
Roger Rail<br />
The death in Umtali after a long illness of Roger Rail in October, 1970, at the age<br />
of 47 has come as a shock to his many friends. He was educated in Utntali, Rhodesia,<br />
and after war service in the East studied forestry at Edinburgh, graduating in 1949.<br />
In 1950 he attended the Colonial Forest Officers post-graduate course at Oxford and<br />
was then appointed to the Rhodesian Forest Service. He resigned in 1968 to take charge<br />
of his father's farm.<br />
He retained an active interest in forestry until his illness. He will always be remembered<br />
for the enthusiasm and determination, at times explosive, with which he undertook<br />
his work, but which was always coupled with his generous and kind nature.<br />
Our sympathies are extended to his widow and two children.<br />
A. B. Jeffrey.<br />
Joseph William Gottstein<br />
Bill Gottstein of C.S.I.R., Melbourne met a tragic death in a tree-felling accident<br />
in New Guinea on 25th March 1971. To those who knewhim it is sad, but not strange,<br />
that it s.hould be his destiny to be killed in the forest he loved, while intent on watching<br />
the behaviour oftimber to understand even better the material to which he had devoted<br />
his professional life.<br />
Bill Gottstein commenced his career at the age of 17 with the Queensland Forest<br />
Service as a cadet wood technologist. For 14 years he was engaged in research and<br />
practical assistance to timber producers and users in his State, gaining at the same time<br />
a B.Sc. in chemistry through part-time studies.<br />
By 1943 the Division of Forest Products, C.S.I.R., was actively seeking his services,<br />
and after initial secondment in 1944 he joined C.S.I.R. as a permanent officer in 1945,<br />
starting as second-in-charge ofthe Seasoning Section. In 1954 he was appointed section<br />
leader of Veneer and Gluing and in 1967 of Timber Conversion, a new section formed<br />
by the amalgamation of seasoning, utilisation, and plywood.<br />
During the later years ofhis career, Bill's renown spread beyond Australia and made<br />
him a figure of truly international repute in the field of composite wood. His services<br />
were increasingly sought by international agencies such as the Food and Agriculture<br />
Organisation ofthe United Nations, his counsel was highly appreciated in international<br />
meetings, and his warm smile and easy manner enabled him to communicate readily<br />
across language barriers. His name is mentioned with esteem and affection in many<br />
places he visited all over the world.<br />
Bill Gottstein leaves a widow and a son of fourteen to whom we extend our most<br />
sincere sympathy.<br />
C.S.I.R.O. Neu,'sletter.<br />
Abdul Rahrnan bin Ali<br />
ABDUL RAHMAN BIN ALl, of the Malayan Forest Service, passed away on 24th<br />
December, 1969, at the age of 44 in his ,home' town of Kuantan in Pahang during<br />
a brief ho'liday visi,t. His untimely death has deprived the Malaysian F'orest<br />
Service of a much experienced, hardw'orking, conscientious and dedicated officer.<br />
He was a ,pillar ,of strength in the service and his death is indee·d a severe blow<br />
to the service which is still suffering from a deart'h of experienced senior officers.<br />
A'b'dul Rahman was first .appointed to the' Forest Department in 1947 as a<br />
Timber Inspector. He earned rapid promotio'ns and at the time of his death he<br />
was ,officiating as State Forest Officer of the 'State of Selangor. But for his<br />
untimely demise he wo,uld 'have in all probability go,ne on to 'become the head of<br />
the Fe'deral Forest Departme'nt.<br />
He took a very active and useful part in various departmental activitlies and<br />
his co,ntri'butio'n to West Malaysian forestry was very notable. One will see the<br />
indelible mark of his eff'orts in almost any field 'of dep,artmental actiVlity one<br />
may choose to examine.<br />
219
220 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
In spite of the he'avy burden of 'his duties, Abdul Ra'hm'an found time to take<br />
an active part in sports and social activities. He was noted for his c'heerful<br />
demeanour and was very much a favourite among 'his fellow officers and subordinates<br />
and among his wide circle 'of friends as well. His untimely dem;ise has left a<br />
profound vacuum which will particularly be felt by 'his wife and children, to<br />
whom we extend our deepest sympathies.<br />
K. D. Menon.
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH<br />
CANADA<br />
Canada's Forest Products exports to the United Kingdom. By G. H. Manning*<br />
In conjunction with a larger study of Canada's supply-demand relationships in<br />
forest products, the Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service has prepared an assessment of the<br />
future export ttade in forest products with the United Kingdom. It is felt that the<br />
results may be ofsome interest to other members of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>.<br />
The United Kingdom is presently Canada's second most important market for<br />
forest products. Sales to the United Kingdom approached $220 million in 1968t.<br />
However, the United Kingdom market for forest products appears to be relatively<br />
stable, and shows few signs of spectacular increases in demand. The United Kingdom<br />
by the turn of the century will, therefore, have been surpassed by Japan in importance<br />
as a market for Canadian forest products.<br />
Lumber, veneer and plywood, woodpulp and newsprint are Canada's major exports<br />
to the United Kingdom. On the basis of importance in world markets, however,<br />
the United Kingdom is .presently Canada's most important customer for veneer<br />
andplywood(40 percent), wrapping paper (76 percent), and paperboard (71 percent)t.<br />
The United Kingdom has been dependent on imports to supply its forest products<br />
requirements for quite some time. MacGreggor (1953) has stated that the proportion<br />
of home-grown softwoods is about five per cent, and of hardwoods 30 to 50 per cent.<br />
Projections of production of home-grown wood by Hummel and Grayson (1969)<br />
indicate that by 1980, about 5.7 million m 3 of roundwood will be available in the<br />
United Kingdom, and by 2000 8.9 million m 3 • Hardwoods will constitute a constant<br />
1.5 million 111 3 • These quantities of roundwood would result in production of 1.9<br />
million metric tons ofwood fibre products and 2 million m 3 ofsawnwood from domestic<br />
raw material by 2000; which would constitute somewhat less than 9 per cent of requirements<br />
as Grayson (1969) predicts total imports of forest products (roundwood<br />
equivalents) at 90 per cent of total requirements in 1957 and 89 per cent in 1980.<br />
PROJECTIONS<br />
Data concerning past and present Canadian exports of forest products to the<br />
United Kingdom, and projections of exports in 1980 and 2000 may be found in<br />
Table 1. Four products constitute the bulk of Canada's forest products exports to<br />
the United Kingdom: lumber, plywood, newsprint, and woodpulp.<br />
Lumber: In 1966, the United Kingdom imported 8.76 million m 3 of lumber. Canada<br />
provided 1.86 million m 3 of these imports, or 21 per cent. Canadian lumber exports<br />
to the United Kingdom have increased at an average of 6.2 per cent annually since<br />
1950, though the past .several years have shown a decline. Given past trends, and<br />
future expectations of the United Kingdom's economy, and in spite of the recent<br />
short-term decline, it is estimated that exports of lumber to this destination will<br />
reach 2.19 million m 3 by 1980, and 2.73 million m S by 2000, a somewhat lower rate<br />
of increase than the historic trend.<br />
Plywood: Canadian exports of plywood to the United Kingdom have increased<br />
rapidly since 1950, up to 225 thousand m S in 1966 from 0.05 thousand m s • Ninetyeight<br />
per cent of this is softwood plywood from British Columbia. It is expected that<br />
exports of plywood to the United Kingdom from Canada will reach 481 thousand InS<br />
by 1980 and 841 thousand m s by 2000, an annual growth rate of 3.6 per cent.<br />
Newsprint: Newsprint is Canada's largest export to the United Kingdom. In 1966,<br />
Canada supplied 348 thousand metric tons of the United Kingdom's total consumption<br />
of 1,388 thousand metric tons. Ray (1965) has estimated newsprint re-<br />
lic Forest Economics Research Institute, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service, Department of the<br />
Environment, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.<br />
t Dominion Bureau of Statistics. Exports by Commodities. D.B.S. Cat. No. 65-004.<br />
t Information courtesy of the Dominion Bureau of Statistics.<br />
221
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 223<br />
have to be radical changes in the attitude-and hence training-of the forester of the<br />
future if he was to fulfil his correct role in social and environmental forestry.<br />
The wave of well-meaning but often uninformed emotion about the quality of the<br />
environment and about that imprecise term "conservation" would doubtless pass.<br />
But informed, responsible concern based on scientifically established facts would<br />
endure and would be backed by a determination that never again would<br />
private enterprise, public apathy, or official mis-management be allowed to devalue or<br />
to destroy the physical environment in which we have to live.<br />
No section of the community exhibited this determination more uncompromisingly<br />
than young people, who would be the leaders of tomorrow and hence the arbiters of<br />
future environmental policy. Because of this, and the hope that foresters would<br />
play a key role in moulding future environmental policy, youth were by far the most<br />
important peopie in forestry.<br />
Forest service-Industry Exchange Suggestion<br />
A proposal for a temporary exchange ofpersonnel between Government and industry<br />
was put forward by New Zealand's Director-General of Forests, Mr. A. P. Thomson,<br />
at the annual general meeting of the New Zealand Institute ofForesters. Mr. Thomson<br />
commented:<br />
"A forester today must have some marketing expertise. I find it difficult to see<br />
how this skill can be imparted by formal training; it seems to me it can come<br />
through experience only.<br />
"I wonder therefore whether New Zealand should not move towards what has<br />
been quite common practice in the United States: the temporary exchange of<br />
personnel between Government and industry. I realise all the difficulties attendant<br />
upon such a suggestion but I believe that if something could be achieved along<br />
these lines it would be very good for the Forest Service, and it might do no harm<br />
to industry ..."<br />
UNITED KINGDOM<br />
A Statement Of<strong>Forestry</strong> Policy For Great Britain<br />
Prepared by The Society ofForesters o/Great Britain, March 1971.<br />
The Elements ofForest Policy<br />
1. Forest Policy is an essential and integral part of the national policy needed to<br />
ensure that our land is used to best advantage. The large and increasing population,<br />
which is preponderately urbanised, and the restricted land area make a<br />
consistent Forest Policy essential.<br />
Land allocated to forestry should be used to attain two main objects, viz:<br />
a) Production of wood and wood-products at the highest level to meet the<br />
demands of industry and reduce our reliance on imports.<br />
b) Provision of shelter, protection of water supplies, conservatiol1 of game<br />
and wild life, preservation and creation ofamenity and provision ofrecreational<br />
areas for our people.<br />
Normally more than one of these objects can simultaneously be achieved within<br />
an area of forest. In particular cases one may be preponderant and impose some<br />
restrictions on the others; but adjustments can usually be made to ensure that<br />
other uses can continue to an appreciable extent. The Forest Policy should therefore<br />
envisage integrated forest practice, often termed "multiple-use forestry".<br />
2. The Forest Policy cannot be considered in isolation but must be related to policies<br />
of land use. Farming, both arable and stock-raising, occupies the greatest land<br />
area; but urban and industrial use of the land and its use for recreation of all<br />
kinds are rapidly increasing. There is no standard formula by which either the<br />
optimum or miniwn area of forested land needed for Great Britain can be determined,<br />
but at present the proportion allocated to forestry is much lower than in<br />
most other developed countries of the temperate zone.
224 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
3. The first statement of Forest Policy for this country aimed at the provision of an<br />
essential reserve of wood to sustain the nation in time of war or blockade; ,this<br />
has been superseded and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners' general duty (as stated in<br />
the <strong>Forestry</strong> Act of 1967) now includes that of "promoting the establishment<br />
and maintenance in Great Britain of adequate reserves of growing trees". The<br />
Society of Foresters of Great Britain considers that the word "reserves" is unsuitable<br />
as it implies a stock which can be drawn on only in an emergency. The<br />
present and future needs are firstly to secure an increasing flow of home-produced<br />
forest products; and secondly to attain in greater measure the benefits listed in<br />
paragraph 1 (b) above. To meet these needs it will be necessary to establish and<br />
maintain additional areas of forests and woodlands.<br />
4. The Society of Foresters considers that the word "adequate" must also be defined.<br />
For wood products "adequate" supplies might be expressed as a proportion of the<br />
projected total consumption of wood in Great Britain; but determination of the<br />
proportion is still required. The essential point is that the land of this country<br />
should be used to best advantage and the Forest Policy must ensure that the<br />
objects of management for land allocated to the growing of trees are clearly<br />
defined, goals are set and the criteria by which the results are to be judged are<br />
specified. A figure of at least 7!- million acres (3 million hectares) of forest is<br />
suggested as a first target and this represents 15 per cent of the total land area of<br />
Great Britain.<br />
5. A feature of recent years has been the conviction, repeatedly stressed by official<br />
committees, that land-use surveys should precede further development of rural<br />
areas. Part III of the Agriculture Act 1967 includes provisions for surveys of this<br />
kind and for the formation of Rural Development Boards. Land-use surveys<br />
can provide the basic information for decisions about the extent and location of<br />
forests on which interim planning can be based. They must not be regarded as<br />
absolute statements of the value or capability of land, because as forestry and<br />
agricultural techniques advance and economic and social circumstances change,<br />
the decisions made by foresters, farmers and other users of the land will alter.<br />
However, on the basis of land-use surveys, forestry development areas in which<br />
timber production could be the primary land-use can be defined. Account should<br />
be taken ofexisting or potential sites for locating wood-using industries and housing<br />
forestry workers. <strong>Forestry</strong> development areas have great potential value for the<br />
development of the remoter rural areas of Britain and the Forest Policy should<br />
encourage their formation. Also, land-use surveys will almost certainly reveal<br />
smaller areas in primarily agricultural or even suburban and urban areas where<br />
the growing of trees is the most suitable use of land, and forestry development<br />
here should also be vigorously encouraged.<br />
6. Further, to ensure that the forest resources of Great Britain are employed to best<br />
advantage, the Forest Policy should require that all forests and woodlands are<br />
properly managed to achieve defined objects. This requirement applies as much to<br />
those in which one or other of the second group of objects given in paragraph 1 is<br />
preponderant as to those intended primarily for the production of wood. Forests<br />
and woodlands should be managed with a view to their perpetuation. A harvested<br />
crop oftrees must be regenerated in situ or else replaced by an equivalent or better<br />
crop elsewhere. Amenity or recreational woodlands should not be allowed to<br />
collapse with the passage of time nor be destroyed by excessive use; their regeneration<br />
should be undertaken, and where necessary their use regulated to<br />
ensure this.<br />
7. The Forest Policy must be framed for the whole of Britain and to meet the needs<br />
of the nation by providing facilities or incentives to those engaged or interested<br />
in forestry namely:<br />
a) the public'forest enterprise managed by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission;<br />
b) forestry activities of other public authorities;
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 225<br />
c) the private forests and woodlands owned by landed proprietors and companies<br />
of various kinds;<br />
d) the industry utilising home-produced wood, comprising the timber trade, the<br />
paper and board industry and other industrial plants processing home-produced<br />
wood;<br />
e) the interests concerned with the management of forests for shelter, conservation<br />
of water, game and wildlife and for recreation and amenity.<br />
8. The Forest Policyfor Great Britain to be pursued by Government should, following<br />
the lines laid down in paragraphs 1 to 7, ensure:<br />
a) That the supplies of growing trees are rising steadily and rapidly to meet the<br />
needs both of developing industry and of import substitution as well as providing<br />
for timber requirements that might arise in a national emergency;<br />
and that land suitable for forestry is being put to this use by the public and<br />
private sectors.<br />
b) That the public forest enterprise has adequate funds for its steady expansion.<br />
c) That the private sector is provided with incentives to maintain and manage its<br />
existing forest land and to extend this wherever suitable.<br />
d) That the industries based on home-produced wood are in balance with the<br />
production of wood; and that industrial development does not outstrip nor<br />
lag behind supplies, both on national and regional scales.<br />
e) That the marketing of home-produced wood is efficient so that the producer<br />
can find a reasonable sale for his produce and the industrial consumer a<br />
regular supply of raw material.<br />
f) That there is continuing research into the factors affecting tree growth and<br />
regeneration of trees; the production, harvesting, marketing and utilisation<br />
of home-produced wood; and the protective and social roles of trees, forests<br />
and woodlands. This research should have as its object an increase in the<br />
value of forestry to the nation.<br />
g) That education in forestry and ancillary subjects is available at professional,<br />
supervisory, industrial and craft levels to ensure that a skilled work force of<br />
sufficient size can be maintained, and that facilities for further education are<br />
provided so that those who enter can rise to higher levels.<br />
h) That a balance is maintained between the commercial objects of public and<br />
private forests and woodlands, their recreational use by the public, the creation<br />
and maintenance of amenity, the protection of water supplies and the conservation<br />
of wildlife.<br />
i) That in the education of the public, including the formal education of the<br />
young, forestry is adequately covered as a method of land use and a factor in<br />
the environment.<br />
The Implementation of Forest Policy<br />
The Forest Authority<br />
9. A Forest Authority is required to advise Government and the Ministers concerned<br />
on the general position of forestry and especially on matters concerning<br />
theprivate andindustrial sectors. The ForestAuthority shouldalso control the operation<br />
of all Acts and Instruments relating to these sectors, be responsible for<br />
finance, research and the collection of statistics about all aspects -of forestry and<br />
advice on the provision of education. The <strong>Forestry</strong> COl11n1issioners have been in<br />
the past and are at present the Government's Forest Authority for this purpose,<br />
though they are also charged with the control and management of the public<br />
forest enterprise. The Society of Foresters recol11n1ends that this dual role be<br />
continued so that the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners remain both the Forest Authority<br />
and the body responsible for the public forest enterprise.<br />
10. It should be the recognised duty of the Forest Authority to radvise Government<br />
on how the Forest Policy is being implemented and on any 'changes required in<br />
the economic, industrial, social and strategic aspects of forest policy.
226 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
The Public Forest Enterprise<br />
11. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners as managers of the public forest enterprise stated<br />
their policy in 1964 in the following terms:<br />
a) "To increase the production of wood as a raw material for industry by extending<br />
the area of their forest at a steady rate, in accordance with sound<br />
land use; and by making each forest as productive as possible.<br />
b) Within the limits set by their other objectives to manage the forest estate as<br />
profitably as possible.<br />
c) To provide employment in rural areas, especially those most affected by<br />
depopulation and in so doing to maintain a skilled labour force.<br />
d) To give due attention to the aesthetic and protective roles of the forest and<br />
to encourage open air recreation."<br />
They further propose in their management:<br />
e) "To help in maintaining an efficient home-timber trade.<br />
f) To foster industrial and social development ancillary to forestry.<br />
g) To encourage the orderly development of ,private forestry and specifically<br />
to assist in creating conditions in which produce from private as well as<br />
Commission forests can be marketed to best advantage."<br />
The Society of Foresters supports this statement of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commissioners<br />
policy for the public forest enterprise. They consider, however,that its scope should<br />
be widened, making it the duty of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission to undertake development<br />
in conjunction with national and local authorities and with landowners<br />
with the object of forming and maintaining new forests having important<br />
land or water resource or recreational objects in which timber production can<br />
nevertheless be substantial.<br />
Other Public <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
12. The extent of this at present is small, being confined to some Water Authorities,<br />
Local Authorities and such bodies as the National Trusts and Nature Conservancy.<br />
But increased involvement in forestry by Local Authorities is certain to result from<br />
their planning powers, particularly in respect of derelict land and the imposition<br />
of Tree Preservation Orders. The establishment, care and regeneration of woodlands<br />
for amenity is as much a part of forestry as the growing of trees for wood.<br />
The negative Tree Preservation Orders should eventually be replaced by more<br />
positive instruments of policy. Local Authorities should have adequate qualified<br />
staff to enable them to perform their functions efficiently. The development of<br />
local public forestry should therefore lie within the scope of the Forest Authority<br />
as the advisory body both to Government and to the local, regional and other<br />
bodies concerned<br />
The Private Sector of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
13. Both the public and private sectors of forestry produce goods and services for the<br />
same market which is potentially so large that there is no danger ofoverproduction<br />
by either sector. The extension of the forest area in private ownership on suitable<br />
land and its proper management should be encouraged. This is especially the case<br />
as private forestry is better able to undertake the maintenance and management<br />
of small areas of woodland. Many private landowners with large holdings have<br />
successfully integrated forestry, farming and sporting interests in the past and<br />
added substantially to the amenity of the countryside. Many more owners are<br />
extending their forests with the assistance of the co-operative organisations, while<br />
the newer forestry development and management companies provide an influx of<br />
fresh capital and ideas, a new source of management and marketing expertise, and<br />
a stake in the land and forestry for more people.<br />
14. The small woodlands of Great Britain are a special case as they contain a high<br />
proportion of the growing stock of. broadleaved trees; they add greatly to the<br />
amenity of the countryside and they provide a means of conserving game and
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH 227<br />
wildlife, often in the most highly populated parts of Great Britain. They supply a<br />
significant proportion of the national consumption of hardwoods and could<br />
contribute even more if all were fully and properly managed. But n1any small<br />
woodlands are becoming derelict and attention should be given to the problems of<br />
managing them and grants should be revised to encourage their better management<br />
and maintenance.<br />
15. The present relatively vigorous stateof theprivatesector offorestry is due in part to<br />
the tax incentives and grants available for planting and managing forests. The<br />
national benefit obtained is much greater than the cost to the nation. For the foreseeable<br />
future Government must continue to provide such incentives for the maintenance<br />
of the private sector of forestry; and the Forest Authority should be<br />
consulted by the fiscal authorities on any proposed changes in the tax structure<br />
which affect forestry operations or holdings.<br />
16. The justification of any Government grant or tax incentive is the long-term<br />
interest of the nation. Forests and woodlands established with their help must be<br />
properly managed and perpetuated. The importance of the Dedication and<br />
Approved Woodland Schemes is illustrated by the inclusion within them of more<br />
than one million acres of forest land. The Society of Foresters considers that the<br />
main object of the Dedication Scheme should continue to be to secure the longterm<br />
dedication of land to efficient forestry.,<br />
17. It is essential for the wellbeing of a forest or woodland that it is properly managed<br />
and that operations take place at or near the time prescribed and are properly and<br />
skilfully executed. When grants have been made for the establishment or maintenance<br />
of forests and woodlands in which subsequent management has been<br />
unsatisfactory the recovery of such grant is justified. Adequately qualified men<br />
possessing recognised forestry qualifications should be employed and the term<br />
"skilled supervision" in the present regulations should be more closely defined and<br />
enforced.<br />
18. On the Continent the farmers' woodlots provide a significant part of the national<br />
production of wood. But in Great Britain although farming and forestry are being<br />
integrated to their mutual benefit in some areas there is little sign that such<br />
integration will develop further. This is almost certainly due to the prevalence of<br />
the landlord-and-tenant system and the conditions of tenancy being such that it is<br />
little or no advantage to either party to adjust the current land use to the best<br />
national advantage; nor can afforestation be assisted by outside finance under these<br />
conditions. The extent to which this prevents proper use of land suitable for<br />
forestry warrants examination of the problem by the Forest Authority with a view<br />
to advising Government on how this difficulty might be overcome.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> and the Public.<br />
19. With the increasing use of the countryside by the urban population the last two<br />
items of general policy set out in paragraph 8 should become a major pre-occupation<br />
of the Forest Authority within the next decade. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission has<br />
created Forest Parks, camping and caravan sites, nature trails and walks, but<br />
already the most favoured and vulnerable areas are in danger of over-use. A wider<br />
expansion of these facilities would reduce pressure on the most popular areas; but<br />
the numbers of visitors will continue to increase, leading perhaps to restriction on<br />
access and a code of permissible use. The pressure for access can be expected to<br />
extend to the woodlands of the private sector and the Society of Foresters considers<br />
that suitable grants should be made available to encourage owners to<br />
provide facilities for access to their woodlands.<br />
4
RESEARCH NOTES 237<br />
It is hoped that individual technical reports will be prepared for publication locally<br />
and that a combined analysis and report will be issued from Oxford later.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
BURLEY, J. and COOLING, E. N. G. 1971. Status ofthe C.F.I. international provenance trial of<br />
Pinus merkusii Jungh.. and de Vriese, September, 1970. Pap.. Symp.. "Selection and improvement<br />
of tropical conifers", Wkg. Gp. Breeding Tropical and Sub-tropical Species, 15th<br />
I.U.F.R.O. Congr., Gainesville, Florida, 5 pp.<br />
LAMB, A. F. A. (1968). Cedrela odorata. Fast Growing Timber Trees of the Lowland Tropics<br />
No. 2. <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, Oxford. 46 pp.<br />
TURNBULL, J. W., and BURLEY, J. (1971). Status of the F.A.O./F.R.I./C.F.I. international<br />
provenance trial ofPinus kesiya. Royle ex Gordon at December, 1970. Pap. Symp. "Selection<br />
and improvement of tropical conifers", Wkg. Gp. Breeding Tropical and Sub-tropical<br />
Species, 15th I.U.F.R.O. Congr., GainesviIle, Florida. 5 pp.
240 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
factors affecting wood production and the genetic variation ,of these factors;<br />
examining the real possibilities of increasing dry matter production 'by bre.eding<br />
for s'pecific physiological features.<br />
It was also indicated that 'intensive management with its trend to monoculture<br />
of either native or exotic species and uniformity of treatments, may produce crops<br />
which are vulnerable to disease or insect attack. Such damage may be sudden<br />
and catastrophic 'but lits probability can Ibe reduced by research into: pest biology<br />
in a variety of forest situations, a field in which there are many opportunities for<br />
international co·'operation.<br />
There is huge scope for research into work systems and mechanisation in order<br />
to reduce inp'uts of wo'rk and money, and many such projects were discussed.<br />
Two very exciting developments in technology which were examined were firstly<br />
the a'pplication of computers to storage and retrieval of forestry information, and<br />
secondly the application of remote sensing techniques to the study of site and<br />
crop features-particularly those using multispectral and linescan ph,oto,grap,hy<br />
both from the ground and from the air. B·oth techniques hold great promise and<br />
their application to forestry research should ,be integrated internatio'nally through<br />
I.D.F.R.O.<br />
An excellent new feature of I.D.F.R.O'. has been the introduction of its Scientific<br />
Ac'hievement Awards for outstanding contributions to knowledge in forestry. The<br />
first five Gold Medals under this scheme were presented by the President, George<br />
Jemison, during the Gainesville Congress.<br />
'The President elect is Professor Ivar Samset and the 16th Congress will take place<br />
in his native Norway in 1976.
242 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
cultivars which 'have arisen tin nurseries, particularly in this co,untry and in<br />
Holland.<br />
The 1970 Conference<br />
The Conferen,ce was opene'd promptly at 1.45 p.m. ,on 5th October by Lord<br />
Aberconway. This was f'ollowed by three lectures, European and Asiatic Conifers<br />
(A. F. Mitchell), American Conifers (R. F. Wood), and The Sele:ction and Breeding<br />
of ,Conifers (R. Faulkner). The Old Hall had a series ,of displays by the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Commlissio'n (seed testing, nurse'ry practice, provenance and gro,wth of 'big specimens),<br />
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (taxonomy of conifers), Forest Products<br />
Research Laboratories (coniferous timbers), the Nature Conservancy (stud:y of<br />
Scots pine), photographs of natural stands in NW. America (B. Mulligan), and<br />
drawings of rare co'nife:rs (Mrs. C. D,arter).<br />
In the New Hall was ,an astonis'hing array of plants of hundre·ds of species and<br />
more 'hundre·ds of cultivars mounted by Mr. Hillier with help fro,m the' Royal<br />
Parks, Windsor. This was designed as six islands, three each side of a wide central<br />
space, each dominated by a fine tree 'of the native Scots pine .from Windsor Forest.<br />
Around th,e walls ,of the hall was a display of foliage of 220 sp'e,cies of 'conifer,<br />
mostly with cones from trees grown on many estates througho,ut the British Isles.<br />
The unprecede'nte'd a'bundance of fruit in 1970 was neatly timed for this C'onference<br />
and many cones were presented w'hich have scarcely been seen before in this<br />
country.<br />
On Tuesday there were lectures ·on Conifers and Nature Conservation (J. N.<br />
Jeffers), T'he Recreational Use of Conifer Woodland (Dr. W. E. S. Mutch),<br />
Conifers fo'r Dec,orative Planting (E. E. Kemp), an'd Pests and Diseases of Conifers<br />
(Dr. M. Crooke and J. S,. Murray). On Wednesday there was a full-day excursion<br />
to Bedgebury National Pinetum and the gardens at Wake:hurst Place. On Thursday<br />
morning there were lectures-the Industrial Use of Coniferous Wo'od (T. A.<br />
Oxley), Conifers in Commercial <strong>Forestry</strong> (D. Seal), and a closing address by Sir<br />
Giles LO'der, Bt. A glorious sunny afternoon was spent at Wisley Garden. Friday<br />
was spent visiting the pineta at Dropmore and Windsor Great Park. On Saturday<br />
the Conference visited Messrs. Hlilliers ,at Jermyns Lane to see a huge assemblage<br />
of trees and a demonstration of propagation of con/jfers by Mr. Humphrey.
COOPERS HILL<br />
By E. W. MARCH<br />
IN HIS ADDRESS at the Annual General Meeting in April our President made reference<br />
to the Royal Indian Engineering College, better known as Coopers Hill, and its<br />
traditions. The College was founded one hundred years ago at the request of the<br />
India Office to provide qualified engineers and telegraphists for service in India. A<br />
forestry section was added in 1886 to provide home training for foresters wishing to<br />
enter the Imperial Forest Service in India, a function which it filled most efficiently<br />
until its closure in 1906.<br />
Many ex-Coopers Hill men were involved in the founding of the Empire <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Association, including H. R. Blandford, Editor/Secretary 1939-1952; it is thereforeall<br />
the more surprising that over the years there has been very little mention of Coopers<br />
Hill in the <strong>Review</strong> other than obituaries mentioning "he was trained at Coopers Hill."<br />
In the Association's library are bound copies of the Coopers Hill Magazine, a lively<br />
little publication published six or eight times a year at a cost of three shillings a year<br />
including postage. In this centenary year of the founding of the College it is felt that a<br />
brief "write up" of what is in effect a bygone era may prove ofinterest.<br />
The organiser of the College and its first President was Lt.-Col. Chesney, R.E.<br />
(later General Sir George Chesney). In those early days the staffwas mainly drawn from<br />
retired Sapper officers. As the years passed and with the introduction of the forestry<br />
course the teaching staff began to take on an academic rather than a military mantle.<br />
Whatever the staff and whatever the standard of education the fact remains that the<br />
College produced a series of officers who were for many years to provide the senior<br />
cadre of the Indian P.W.D. and <strong>Forestry</strong> Service. We cannot speak for the P.W.D.<br />
section but the record of the I.F.S. men speaks for itself.<br />
Turning to the students, what manner of men were they and what was their outlook<br />
on life? Mainly from the leading public schools their gospel was a simple one: loyalty<br />
to the Crown, to their country, to their alma mater and a firm belief in the British<br />
presence in India. Their other qualities will be apparent from the various references<br />
to their activities as extracted from the Coopers Hill Magazine.<br />
No account of Coopers Hill would be complete without reference to its sporting<br />
activities. In an average year the College had slightly over one hundred students in<br />
residence yet this small number ran two Rugger XVs, one Soccer XI, two eights on the<br />
river, and still found time for golf, tennis and billiards, not forgetting cricket and<br />
tennis in the summer. It was on the Rugger field that the College really distinguished<br />
itself, its opponents included Oxford University, Harlequins, Richmond, London<br />
Welsh, London Scottish and the leading London Hospital teams. During their short<br />
existence they produced no less than fourteen internationals in this field of sport.<br />
According to the Sporting Life at one time "the College had certainly the strongest<br />
side ill the South of England and was probably the strongest club in the country."<br />
The record for the period of its existence was:-<br />
Matches played 491 Matches lost 155<br />
Matches won 268 Matches drawn 68<br />
Whilst on the subject of Rugby football how many present day enthusiasts are<br />
aware of the origin of the Calcutta Cup? In the early days of the College a cup was<br />
subscribed for and sent to India for annual competition by the three Presidencies,<br />
Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. This competition was not a success as in those days the<br />
climate was considered hardly favourable for Rugby football and after a very short<br />
time the series was discontinued. The cup was then returned to this country and presented<br />
as a trophy to be awarded to the winner of the Annual England-Scotland International<br />
match, which it is to this day.<br />
In addition to studies and sport, social activities were a regular feature of the college<br />
year. An annual Bal Masque was held every November and judging by the reports was<br />
popular and well patronised. Regular monthly dinners were held at the Criterion<br />
243
244 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Restaurant, Piccadilly:- the cost, 3/6 per head exclusive of wines. A college concert at<br />
the end of the autumn term was another regular feature of the social curriculum.<br />
Prize giving provided yet a further regular social event. Wherever they went overseas<br />
Coopers Hill men maintained their gregarious habits, there are reports of annual<br />
dinners at the Bombay Yacht Club; the Sind Club, Karachi; in Calcutta; in Maymyo,<br />
the Burma Hill Station, and Shepheards Hotel, Cairo.<br />
A feature ofthe Coopers Hill Magazine which makes any present day editor envious<br />
is the regularity with which past members kept the editor well supplied with Blackwoodtype<br />
articles, both on the nature of their duties and the lighter side of life. Stories of<br />
Shikar were regularly received; in 1900 an article from R. S. Pearson (later Sir Raif<br />
Pearson of F.P.R.L.) contains the following item to excite the imagination of would-be<br />
sportsmen:<br />
"I have just heard that another of my 'tie-ups' has been killed and hope to get<br />
another tiger today. I am waiting for news from another direction and if there<br />
should be two kills, as is likely, I shall try a 'beat' in one place and a 'sit up' in<br />
another. My camp tomorrow is in a place where a tiger roams about so I may get<br />
a chance again there. You see there are plenty of tigers to spare."<br />
In the same year W. Sullivan, P.W.D. gives an excellent account of a Kadir Cup<br />
Meet. This we hope to publish in full in a subsequent number of the <strong>Review</strong>. Another<br />
item with a certain amount of historic interest is an account of wild elephant catching<br />
in Burma by the kheddah method; the author-another P.W.D. officer, J. E. Dallas.<br />
Accounts of adventures with bison, leopards and other big game were a regular<br />
feature of the magazine.<br />
As is only to be expected in a College magazine where all students have one end in<br />
view; conditions of service are frequently discussed; salary scales, pension rights and<br />
furlough privileges are much to the fore. Looking back it is obvious that bit by bit<br />
concessions were wrung out of the Secretary of State for India but the editorial edict<br />
invariably was "we do not expect to find the terms received with much gratitude."<br />
The serving officer of today in receipt of so many passage concessions and baggage<br />
allowances will be astounded to learn that the Coopers Hill man going to India after<br />
his initial voyage was not given any further passage allowances. The stories of officers<br />
serving twenty or more years without home leave were not old-timer inventions. Many<br />
officers were just not able to save up their passage money and settled for spells ofleave in<br />
one of the hill stations. W. S. Schlich is on record as having only taken one home leave<br />
during his 19 years in India. In 1900 however, the Secretary of State most graciously<br />
agreed that for the first three months ofan overseas furlough an officer should be on full<br />
pay in order to enable him to meet the cost ofhis passage.<br />
A rather gloomy note is struck by the regularity of obituary notices of young officers<br />
within the first two years of their service. The recorded causes of death were malaria,<br />
cholera, enteric and heat-stroke. For those surviving the vital first two years the next<br />
hurdle appeared to be the middle forties at which age quite a number of in-service<br />
deaths are recorded. Assuming he survived those vital ages the Indian forest, or other<br />
service, officer could well expect to become an octogenarian or possibly a nonagenarian<br />
as shown in the obituary notices in the <strong>Review</strong>:- E. P. Stebbing 91, A. J. Gibson 94,<br />
and L. S. Osmaston 99 to mention but a few examples of longevity. As far as we are<br />
aware the sole surviving Coopers Hill forester is A. E. Osmaston still hale and hearty<br />
in his 87th year living in retirement in Sussex.<br />
Not all Coopers Hill men went to India, in later years many found their way to<br />
Egypt and the Sudan. In the final few years mention is also made oftransfers to Malaya<br />
and Uganda. Scattered throughout the magazine are interesting scraps of what was to<br />
become forest history. It was in 1902 that A. M. Bum-Murdoch was transferred to<br />
Malaya to set up a forest Department there. The establishment of organised forestry in<br />
the Sudan in 1900 is recorded; likewise the beginnings of the "man made" forests of<br />
SouthAfrica, then Cape Colony. The names ofthose who were to become famous in the<br />
forestry world in later years are scattered through the pages of the magazine; T. S.
THE FUTURE OF TIMBER IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY 249<br />
and producer in ensuring the minimum variety of sizes, etc. being used'in the<br />
production of a 'component. Th'ere is considerable scope for economies here.<br />
Generally, unless we do gain 'be·nefits in this way dim.ensional co-ordination can<br />
only increase the cost of timber co,mpo·nents. It is inevitable that more material<br />
is consumed since there are greater limitations on the sizes whic'h can be used. It<br />
is essential therefore that savings in production costs offset increased use of<br />
materials. This may be more difficult with timber than many other materials since<br />
the actual mate·rials used frequently account for up to 60 per cent of the total cost<br />
of the product whilst labour may be as low as 15 per cent.<br />
3 Scientific Control<br />
Th'ere will undoubtedly be an increasing reliance on standards and specifications<br />
whic'h wi11 be adm'inistered 'by technical people with no particular .allegiance to<br />
traditional materials such as timber. It will be their job to specify and authorise<br />
the use 'of mate'rial1s in 'buildings and they will only wish to specify and use<br />
guarantee'd ones. Although at present timber may have difficulty in meeting sllc'h<br />
requirements the technology is available· to enable it to do so.<br />
4 Economy and Performance<br />
The use 'of performance standards will provide a base against which the performance<br />
can be judged and hence e'conomy estimated for particular components.<br />
Timber is in certain difficulty here because muc'h of its use has been traditional<br />
rather than based on design work. However, th'ere is no doubt that by developme'nt,<br />
improvements can be made in timber products to meet perforfmance standards.<br />
5 Maintenance<br />
Far too l,ig a proportion of our building force in this country is e'mployed in<br />
maintenance rather than on creating new buildings. There is littlle doubt that<br />
increasing attention will be paid to reducing maintenance and the use of preservatives<br />
and better surface coatings will have a big part to play in this.<br />
6 Quick Erection<br />
The combined 'effects of increasing cost of site labour, 'hold-ups due to bad<br />
weather and the need for more building win continue. The trend towards quick<br />
erection means that new methods of jointing panels together and ibetter methods<br />
of handling compone'nts on site will be required. It will also be necessary to<br />
obtain a better sequence of phased delivery and erection on site so that components<br />
are not lying on the ground in bad weather for long periods. The requirements<br />
of quick erection will obviously lead to a greater use of components and the<br />
present trend towards an increasing use of trussed rafters will continue, and this<br />
will 'be accompanied in the future by a greater use of fl'oor and wall panels, etc.<br />
Athough many building firms seem to be particularly bad at organising an<br />
efficient erection operation this is not peculiar to timber and hence s'hould not<br />
militate against the use of timber co'mponents.<br />
7 High Quality<br />
There are distinct signs that econ·om,y is not the only requirement which people<br />
demand in their 'houses. There will, I 'believe, be an increasing demand for higher<br />
quality products compared with the standard eco·nomy ones. Timber can g,o a<br />
long way to meeting this type of requirement. As an eX'ample there may well arise<br />
two levels of !performance for components in the future. One, a more costly but a<br />
much better performing product and two, an economy one. Better quality can be<br />
provide'd at extra cost and timber can certa1inly 'meet any demand that will arise<br />
for a higher quality. Examples of this co'uld well be in two standards 'of door, a<br />
more expensive stable variety as well as an economy ·one, and in wind'ows there is
THE FUTURE OF TIMBER IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY 251<br />
lower moisture contents. However, there is no p,oint in drying the timber to a low<br />
moisture content if p,rece'ding and during the 'building operatio,n it is re·-we·tted<br />
appreciably. There are really two main solutions to the problem. One is a change<br />
in building 'practice which 'would include such things as all dry construction, phased<br />
delivery so that the material does not lie about on site, roofs put on quickly as<br />
possible and heating applied early in the life of the ,building. The other solution<br />
which can only be partially successful is to take every opportunity in design to<br />
minimise the effects of timber move-ment.<br />
9 Preservation<br />
The need for preservative treatment of non-durable timber is dependent on the<br />
hazard to which it is exposed and in wooden buildings timber may be exposed to<br />
a variety of conditions dep,ending up,on its location. The two major hazards, fungal<br />
decay and insect attack, can be considered separately. Fungal decay could be completely<br />
eliminated if the moisture content of the ,voo'd could b'e kept below that required<br />
to support fu-ngal gro'wth (about 20 per cent). Where the' moisture content<br />
is 'likely to be higher, e.g. fillets in concrete, external cladding, places where high<br />
conde.nsation is probable, well painted external joinery, preservative treatment is<br />
desirable. On the other !hand attack by insects is not depende-nt on damp conditions<br />
but on the availability of suscepti'ble sapw'ood in which they can lay eggs. Apart<br />
from hylotrupes areas (mainly in Surrey) it is debatable whether treatment against<br />
insect attack is necessary. This depends to some exte,nt on the cost of initial treatment<br />
compared 'with subsequent necessary remedial treatment. A serious decay<br />
problem which has come to light in recent times is the pre-mature decay of exterior<br />
joinery. At present there is no requirement written into Building Regulations for<br />
the treatment of joinery timber but the revised Codes of Practice and activities of<br />
NHBRC are drawing attention to the need for preservative treatment in this area<br />
and it will undou'btedly become an increasing requirement. Most suppliers of<br />
timber windows now only offer treated timber products.<br />
10 Stress Grading<br />
While the greatest single obstacle to the efficient use of solid timber as a<br />
structural material is its variability, without some form of selection only very small<br />
loads can be safely carried by timber me'm'bers. T'herefore, in order to utilise tim'ber<br />
to the best advantage it is essential at some stage to introduce some form of<br />
grading. If the requirements of buildings in future are going to 'be: based on a<br />
guaranteed technical product, stress grading will beconle increasingly imp'ortant.<br />
By using ap'propriately graded material we can reduce the amount of timber in<br />
roofs and floors of houses and also guarantee them against collapse. Stress grading<br />
is purely a grading of the material on its ability to carry loads. Until recently<br />
there has only been one' method of stress grading of timber, that is by visual<br />
examination. Geneltally efforts over the years to introduce systems of visual stress<br />
grading have failed. This method is concerned with measuring the size of defects<br />
and deciding whether or not the;y are above or below a certain accep1table level.<br />
In the past fe'w years considerable progress has been made in the mechanical<br />
stress grading of timber. Various prototype machines ;have been studied and three<br />
of these are now in commercial use in the: United Kingdom. Most of the work on<br />
these machines is based on the relationships which exist betwee'n the strength of<br />
timber and its stiffness or the amount that it deflects under load. Briefly, mechanical<br />
grading consists of fee,ding timb'er continuously through a machine, the· machine<br />
imposes a small load and measures the resulting deflectio-n. It is then assumed<br />
that with a particular size the strength of the tim'ber is pro'portional to· this de'fie,ction,<br />
that is, pieces w'hich only deflect a small amount will be strong and those<br />
with a relatively high de'flection will ,be weak. One very important advantage of<br />
machine grading is that 'concerned with the various species of timber. A grading
252 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
machine grades pieces of tim'ber regardless of species. In other forms of visual<br />
grading one has to know the species of tim-ber before it can be given a rating.<br />
The new methods of stress grading 'will enable us in the future to obtain the best<br />
com,bination of safety and economy with different sizes and grades of timber for<br />
particular 'purposes.<br />
11 Products<br />
(a) Doors<br />
Because of the emergence of performance standards and the possible need for<br />
higher quality products, research has \been going on into the performance of<br />
doors in service. This has primarily been concerned with the effects of distortion<br />
due to differential temperature and humidity conditions on the two faces and<br />
the tendency of doors to leak to both air and water. Considera'ble, progress has<br />
bee'n made in understanding the factors which cause: distortion of doors. Distortion<br />
can ,be reduced by the use of vapour barriers. Also paint films can delay<br />
the take up of moisture. Similarly work has been in progress to study air and<br />
water leakage of doors and this can be reduced to aecepta'ble levels by suitable<br />
methods of sealing.<br />
(b) Windows<br />
Proposals have ;been made by various public organisations for performance<br />
standards on windows for such pro'perties as<br />
i Thermal movement<br />
ii Thermal insulation<br />
iii Mechanical strength<br />
iv Resistance- to wear<br />
v Sound insulation<br />
v-j Fire resistance<br />
vii 'Convenience in use<br />
viii Wind gust strength<br />
None of these performances is as yet supported 'by a national standard test<br />
method 'but some research work is proceeding to enable ,this to be done.<br />
There are, hO'wever, standard test methods for air penetration and water resistance.<br />
These methods are specified in a British Standard and various research<br />
laboratories are studying the performance of timber windows in this context.<br />
There is every reason to -believe, that timber windo-ws can meet any requirements<br />
that will be asked for in this respect.<br />
(c) Roofs<br />
Work at FPRL on trussed rafters has resulted in the, amount of timber in a<br />
house roof 'being reduced from about 60 cu. ft. to about 40 cu. ft. per dw'e'lling.<br />
Also at the same time erection times have reduced dramatically to about onetenth<br />
of traditional roofs. This has been achieved by the development of trussed<br />
rafters using the minimum amount of material an-d special jointing plates. At<br />
present there are about 90 small plants making trussed rafters in the United<br />
Kingdom and last year production amounted to something approaching a<br />
million and a half trussed rafters.<br />
(d) Floors and Walls<br />
Research to reduce the amount of tim-ber and the erection time to a minimum<br />
in floors and walls ,has lagged behind work.on ro-ois. However, this has not<br />
entirely been the fault of timber. Generally it has been found that the accuracy<br />
of building has not permitted the prefa'brication of floor units to fit in between<br />
other building materials, e.g. brick. Therefore, prefabrication has lagged behind.<br />
However, the increasing use of timber walls and the belief that accuracy.in<br />
building is improving has led to an increasing amount of research being directed<br />
to'wards tim'ber wall and floor units. There is little doubt that this will lead to a
THE FUTU-RE OF TIMBER IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY 253<br />
better performance level for these components linked with a saving of<br />
m.aterial.<br />
12 Production<br />
Due to lack of continuity of orders there, has been a lack of incentive to get<br />
better production metho-ds in many timber components. However, achievements<br />
in the production of doors and wind,?ws where a very high level of production and<br />
quality is maintained at a relatively Iow cost indicates that similar achievements<br />
are possible should demand increase for other timber components.<br />
13 Reduced Maintenance<br />
This item covers points already mentioned such as preservative treatment and<br />
be,tter design. In addition there is work on surface coatings to protect the materials.<br />
Surface coating of tim'ber is a subject which has until recently ;b-e'en rather<br />
neglected. However, we are now giving much more attention to this important<br />
subje·ct. There is little dou·bt that the future use of timber products as external<br />
cladding materials is linked to the development of surface coatings requiring the·<br />
minimum of maintenance. A number of related projects are being studied at<br />
p,resent in the painting of timber and timber p·roducts and these should enable<br />
timber to maintain its position as a widely used external building material.
FRUIT DEVELOPMENT AND<br />
INSECT PESTS OF TERMINALIA IVORENSIS A. CHEV.<br />
By N. JONES (Silviculturist) and J. KUDLER (Entomologist)<br />
Forest Products Research Institute, Kumasi, Ghana<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Terminalia i ...orensis is likely to become an important plantation species in West<br />
African countries. Phenological studies have been initiated to examine the seasonal<br />
variation in flower and fruit development. Though fruits are readily available many fall<br />
before reaching maturity, the germination period is long and the viability poor. The<br />
results of pre-treatment studies suggested that poor germination was due to some<br />
factor other than dormancy. Investigations led to the discovery of two weevils,<br />
Nanophyes sp., and Auletobius sp., which are probably responsible for the fruits<br />
falling before ripening and the poor quality of mature fruits.<br />
Introduction:<br />
The amount of natural forest in the world is constantly being reduced through<br />
exploitation. Most countries have now adopted some type of afforestation programme<br />
to either maintain or create a forest resource. Almost any species which can be raised<br />
as a plantation crop over a reasonably wide range of sites becomes important.<br />
Terminalia ivorensis is such a species to West African forestry practice. It fruits plentifully<br />
and regularly, stores well, can be raised in large numbers in forest nurseries,<br />
transplants with low mortality and has an acceptable growth rate. At present only a<br />
relatively small volume is exploited from the natural forest but the tree has regular<br />
form, and the timber a good figure and distinctive colour. These factors will all be<br />
important as plantations mature.<br />
It has already been said the fruits are readily available; however, germination is<br />
poor and the germination period is long. Taylor (1960) states that germination can<br />
be raised to 40% by pre-treating and the irregular germination period averages 32<br />
days. He also refers briefly to an attacking insect. A large number of pre-treatments<br />
were tested at the Forest Products Research Institute, Kumasi, Ghana (See Anon.<br />
1968, Damptey 1967, Jones 1969), none of which improved on 40% with any certainty<br />
nor did they reduce the germination period. They served only to emphasise the fact<br />
that a more fundamental research technique is needed (Jones 1969). It is necessary<br />
to know how many sound seeds are sown before an accurate estimate of the viability<br />
can be made.<br />
A study of the anatomical characteristics of a samara revealed it is made up of two<br />
halves with a plate of weak tissue between. By squeezing the fruit in a vice it was<br />
possible to rupture it along this plate and extract the seeds. About 50 %ofall the stored<br />
fruits randomly selected for testing did not contain seeds or contained seeds attacked<br />
by insects (Jones and Kudler 1968). This led to the examination of immature fruits<br />
in the 1969 fruit development season (Jones and Kudler 1969), which is much easier<br />
than that of mature fruits. Further observations were made in 1970 on even younger<br />
fruits.<br />
Phenological Records:<br />
Very little work is recorded regarding periodicity of the various characters in the<br />
life cycle of forest trees in West Africa. Initiation of tree improvement programmes<br />
has led to the realisation that insufficient is known about time of flowering and the<br />
development offruits on different trees. This information is essential to the organisation<br />
ofseed orchards and to planning ofcontrolled pollination studies. General information<br />
for Ghanaian species is readily available (see Taylor 1960) but details of between-tree<br />
and between-site variation are needed. The tree improvement programme in Ghana<br />
was launched in 1966 (Jones 1966) and Terminalia ivorensis was included.<br />
254
FRUIT DEVELOPMENT AND INSECT PESTS 255<br />
A number of Terminalia ivorensis trees were chosen at the different research centres<br />
throughout the high forest to collect data for flowering and fruiting studies. Notes<br />
are made each week on the condition of the leaves, flowers and fruits of each tree.<br />
Unfortunately not all the trees in the study flowered each year. Data covering the<br />
period July 1967 to July 1968 are complete for the Bobiri, Pra-Anum and Somanya<br />
Research Centres and for Kumasi. Only one tree of the seven visited flowered at<br />
Bobiri, all seven trees in the Pra-Anum group flowered and both trees at Somanya.<br />
Nine trees are visited at Kumasi, and though records are complete for three years,<br />
only one tree flowered in these three years which was in the 1967-68 flowering season.<br />
Flowers are not easy to see, both the Somanya trees were recorded as having developing<br />
fruits but never flowers; it was the same with the Bobiri tree. All fruits developing<br />
on the Bobiri and Kuumasi trees fell before they were ripe. Only one tree at Somanya<br />
had fruits which ripened, three of the seven Pra-Anum trees bore ripe fruits. In the<br />
1967-68 flowering year, out of twenty-five trees visited each week, eleven flowered<br />
but only four bore ripe fruits. This is a high mortality and such a situation occurring<br />
in seed orchards could prove disastrous to a plantation programme.<br />
Fruit Development:<br />
It is important to know the sequence and timing of events. Taylor (1960) records<br />
flowering of Terminalia ivorensis in Ghana from the end of February until the end of<br />
June. Fruits are recorded between mid-January and the end of April. Fruits in this<br />
sense refers to the mature ripe fruits, therefore the fruit development period, i.e. from<br />
the first record of flowering, is from the end of February in one year until the end of<br />
April the following year. In fact, immature fruits may be falling from some trees while<br />
fruits from the previous fruiting season are still maturing on others.<br />
Taylor stresses that his data refer to a species rather than individual trees and that<br />
variations may occur on any particular site. Studies to relate phenological sequences<br />
to seed orchard management must take into account individual tree variation. In the<br />
current phenological studies all the Pre-Anum trees were still in flower during the first<br />
week of July 1967 and immature fruits were falling from them all by the third week of<br />
July. Immature fruits did not start to fall from the Bobiri trees until the first week of<br />
September, the Somanya trees until the third week of September and the Kumasi<br />
trees until the first week of October. Ripe fruits were falling from one tree in Somanya<br />
between the third week of January and the last week of March 1968. All the ripe<br />
fruits fell from the three Pra-Anum trees in the first week of February 1968.<br />
(a) Immature Fruits:<br />
Observations on immature fruits which started in August 1968 are recorded by Jones<br />
(1969) and Anon. (1969). Between August and November, two small seeds were seen<br />
in the cavities of the soft green fruit cases. One seed develops rapidly after this and by<br />
the beginning of December cigar-shaped seeds more or less fill the seed cavities. This<br />
is the period when the tissues harden. It is impossible to slice into the seed cavity after<br />
the first or second week in January.<br />
Immature fruits were collected from a tree near Kumasi in mid-July 1970 to continue<br />
the investigations. The length of the developing fruits (excluding the wing) were<br />
measured. In July the fruits were from 5 to 6 mm. long with a maximum length of<br />
8 mm., by the end of July 6 to 7 mm. with a maximum of 12 mm. The mean length<br />
ofthe 1969 September collections was 14 mm. and a number ofmature fruits in storage<br />
were measured and the mean length was 20 mm. Therefore since flowering takes place<br />
in April or May, development of the fruit is most rapid during the August/September<br />
period and the mature size is probably attained some time in December.<br />
(b) Seed Development:<br />
The fruit case develops more rapidly than the seed at first. Seeds were approximately<br />
1 mm. in length in the July 1970 collections and only about 2 to 2.5 mm. in the late
256 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
September 1969 collections. The cavity in which the seed develops increases in proportion<br />
with the fruit case. It is not until mid-November that there is any appreciable<br />
increase in the seed size. After this date elongation is rapid and the surviving seed<br />
soon fills the seed cavity.<br />
(c) The Mature Fruit:<br />
The indehiscent mature samara is described by Jones (1969). It is made up of a<br />
papery brown epidermis beneath which is a layer of tissues made up of large air and<br />
crystal filled vacuoles for buoyancy. Hard stony tissues surround the seed cavity.<br />
The plate ofweakness between the two developing carpels has already been mentioned;<br />
the fruit case always ruptures along this plane during germination.<br />
Insect Attack:<br />
In "Tree Seed Notes" (Anon. 1955) there is a comment that 30% of the fruits may<br />
be attacked. Taylor (1960) says many fruits are bored while they lie on the ground.<br />
No comment has been made on the insect causing the damage. Preliminary work on<br />
the subject is recorded by Jones and Kudler (1968) which dealt entirely with mature<br />
fruits which had been in storage for nearly a year or freshly collected mature fruits.<br />
The insect pest was found to be a weevil, later identified as Nanophyes sp. (Fig. 1)<br />
never previously recorded in Ghana. There were indications that at least 35 % of the<br />
fruits collected were attacked and this could mean that the weevil may considerably<br />
reduce both the quality and quantity of fruits which mature.<br />
The preliminary investigation showed the need for a study of the life cycle of the<br />
insect pest. This involved collections of premature fruits from Terminalia ivorensis in<br />
September and October 1969. It was evident that a vast majority of fallen immature<br />
fruits had punctures, often five to seven on a single fruit case; these were usually on the<br />
part distant to the point of fruit attachment. Some first instar larvae were found in the<br />
fruits. It seemed likely that the insect attack was responsible for the fruits falling<br />
(Jones and Kudler 1969). Examination of damaged fruits continued and development<br />
of the weevil was recorded. The first pupa was found inside the seed cavity in early<br />
December 1969 and the first exit holes later the same month. From this it was estimated<br />
that the life cycle of the pest is at least three months (Jones and Kudler 1970). The<br />
quality of mature fruits is considerably reduced. It can be seen from the figures in<br />
Table 1 that sometimes only 6% of the seeds develop. The level of mortality ranges<br />
from 43 % to 94 %.<br />
TABLE 1<br />
Reduction in quality of mature Terminalia ivorensis fruits caused by Nanophyes sp.<br />
Collection<br />
Date Place<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
No. of<br />
Seed-%<br />
Fruits Punctures per Fruits<br />
l"otal Fruit with Fully I Not Attacked<br />
No.<br />
Stained I Devel-<br />
Min. IMax.!Av. Walls<br />
Devel- by<br />
oped oped Weevil<br />
I<br />
1/12/69 Pra-Anun1 46 0 15 3 I 43 57 13 30<br />
3/12/69 Bia-Tano 31 1 16 7 31 52 16 32<br />
22/12/69 Mpraeso 36 1 14 4 29 6 41 53<br />
6/1/69 Asenanyo 43 1 21 5 43 7 37 56<br />
14/1/69 Asenanyo 86 0 15 3 75 16 41 43<br />
4/2/69 Asenanyo 90 0 15 5 78 27 19 54<br />
17/2/69 Asenanyo 110 0 16 6 91 37 19 44<br />
24/2/69 Asenanyo 100 0 11 5 88<br />
I<br />
33 13 54
6<br />
FRUIT DEVELOPMENT AND INSECT PESTS 259<br />
Fig. 1. A weevil, Nanophyes sp. a, egg; b, grub; c, pupa; d, adult. (Orig. J. Kudler.)<br />
Fig. 2. Fruits of Terminalia ivorensis observed in early September 1970 at umasi.
260 COMMO WEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Fig. 3. A weevil, Auletobius kuntzeni m. a, blackish spots on upper-surface of immature<br />
Terminalia ivorensis fruits, indicating punctures; b, egg; c, larva; d, pupa; e, adult. (Orig.<br />
J. Kudler.)
262 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Acknowledgments:<br />
The authors are greatly indebted to Mr. E. Voss, Harderberg, West Germany,<br />
for identification of weevils, and to specialists of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Institute of<br />
Entomology, London, for identification of the other insect species involved.<br />
REFERENCES:<br />
ANON. (1955). Tree Seed Notes. F.A.O. For. Development Pap. No. 5, Rome.<br />
ANON. (1968/69). Annual Report of the Forest Products Research Institute, Kumasi. C.S.I.R.,<br />
Ghana.<br />
DAMPTEY, H. B. (1967). Germination of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I.,<br />
Ghana, 4: 8-10.<br />
JONES, N. (1966). Tree Selection and Seed Improvement in Ghana. Tech. Note No. 1, F.P.R.I.,<br />
Ghana, 13p.<br />
JONES, N. (1969). The Influence of Certain Pre-Treatments and Conditions for Germination<br />
on the Seeds of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I., Ghana, 3(1): 9-18.<br />
JONES, N. (1969). A Description of Fruit of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I.,<br />
Ghana, 3(3/4): 11-15.<br />
JONES, N. and KUDLER, J. (1968). A Report on the Preliminary Work on the Influence ofWeevil<br />
Attack on the Germination of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I., Ghana,<br />
2(2): 11-14.<br />
JONES, N. and KUDLER, J. (1969). Some Particulars Concerning Weevil Attack on the Fruits<br />
of Terminalia ivorensis. Tech. Newsletter, F.P.R.I., Ghana, 3(3/4): 7-10.<br />
JONES, N. and KUDLER, J. (1970). Recent Developments in Fruiting Studies of Terminalia<br />
ivorensis A. Chev. and Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum. Affected by Insect Pests.. Paper<br />
for the 7th Biennial Conference of W.A.S.A., Ibadan, Nigeria, 7p.<br />
TAYLOR, C. J. (1960). Synecology and Silviculture in Ghana. Th. Nelson and Sons, London.
ARE GRADUATES IN FOREST SCIENCE QUALIFIED FOR<br />
APPOINTMENT TO PROFESSIONAL POSTS?<br />
by 'C. L. WICHT<br />
Professor of Silviculture, University of Stellenbosch.<br />
A COpy of an address to the South African Institute of <strong>Forestry</strong>, delivered in May,<br />
1969, b'y Mr. 'Craig Anderson, National Chairman of the South African Timber<br />
Growers' Association, was re'cently handed to me, in which.Ihe commented on<br />
university training in forestry.* As I addressed the <strong>Forestry</strong> Society of Stellen'bosch<br />
University on a similar subject in March" I have decided to repeat some of the<br />
remarks I made then in order to indicate what can reasonably 'be expecte'd from<br />
the gradualte in forest 'Science when he takes up a job. At the same time I shalll<br />
try to correct some rather prevalent erroneous ideas of what un1iversity training<br />
aims at.<br />
Mr. Anderson has stressed the poor remuneration received for forestry services,<br />
and this is a matter 'which might well be take'n up Iby SATGA and the Institute<br />
of <strong>Forestry</strong>. <strong>Forestry</strong> is much more than the immediate profitable management<br />
of plantations and sawmills or pulpmills, wh'ich might well be achieved by<br />
experienced non-professionals in charge. But, however efficient current management,<br />
'based purely on past experience, may 'be, it will fail if the manager does<br />
not have the knowledge of the fundamental 'bionomic and economic principles<br />
on w'hiclh forestry production is ibased. This knowledge is 'imparted at the<br />
University so !that the graduate in a professional post will not merely know how<br />
to manage, but alsol why the work s'hould be .organised in a, particular way and<br />
w'hat modific'ations may 'be needed to adapt production to' fluctuations in the<br />
general economy olr changes in the quantity and quality of the products in<br />
demand. The industry should be pre'pared to renumerate the graduate in forestry<br />
adequately and then expect from him the "knolw' how" and "know why" to ensure<br />
an enterp'rising and efficie,nt undertaking. The graduate who cannot meet these<br />
requirements will ibe unfit for the jOlb! for reasons other than defe:cts in 'his training.<br />
A student w'hose training is :based o'n the; extension of his factual knowledge,<br />
as happ'e:ns at technical colleges and the School for Foresters, will so'on find that<br />
his ideas have 'beeo-me antiquated. The University student whose training, even<br />
as an under-graduate', lis /based on :a logical, scientific foundation, should -be able,<br />
after he has graduated, to ensure that he remains informe'd of the newest developments<br />
in his field. He should, exactly like the members of the teaching staff at<br />
the University, supplement his knowledge constantly Iby studying technical publications,<br />
'by his own o:bservations or, even, ib'y undertaking original research.<br />
If he 'has special1ised, after leaving the University, in a particular field, :he should,<br />
after five or ten years, Ibe a'ble tOI discuss problems with 'his former lecturers<br />
and professors on, at least, an equal footing.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> includes also Ithe develop,ment and planagement of water catchmeints,<br />
nature reserv'es in natural forest a'nd veld and outdoor recreational areas. It<br />
undertakes the arresting of mo,ving dunes and provides expertgu'idance on the<br />
c'hoice of trees planted for woodlots, s'hade, shelter and ,ornament on farms, and<br />
in parks, gardens and along streets in to,wns. It is an essential task of forestry<br />
to ensure that adequate green areas are maintained. In the increasingly teehn,ological<br />
and me:chanistic world, forestry must "verdurise" the landscape to constitute<br />
a wholesome, health-preserving environment for man. Verdant forests and veld<br />
of adequate extent are needed to p,rovide areas where the internal com'bustion<br />
engines, the factories and crammed, gasping populations do, not raise the carbon<br />
di-oxide content of the atmosphere to' st'ifling levels, or even poison it with<br />
carbon monoxide.<br />
* See March <strong>Review</strong>, Page 62.<br />
263
266 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
and then translate the research findings into direct practical prescrip't'ions to be<br />
applied 'by Foresters and other technicians. It is not the task ,of the "boffin"<br />
to frame results of research in the form of instructions, or present his material in<br />
.pop'ular form. It iis the task of the graduate in forestry who is engaged in practical<br />
forestry to do this. With the 'basic training provided in the four years needed<br />
to qualify for the B.Sc. degree in forestry he sho,uld not find research papers<br />
a'bstruse. If he were to 'be trained merely to manage· plantations, sawmills and p'ulpmills<br />
in accordance with current practice, he would no;t be able to follow the<br />
papers in modern scientific forestry journals, which necessar'ily include the concep'ts<br />
and terminology of mathematical statistics and other sp·ecialised .subjects. If<br />
management in forestry were left to men who cannot read and understand technical<br />
'papers and apply the latest contributions to forestry knowle'dge, the industry<br />
would stagnate and lose in the struggle for econom'ic survival.<br />
Reprinted by courtesy of the South African <strong>Forestry</strong> Journal.
The Editor,<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> <strong>Review</strong>.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE<br />
Forest Research Institute,<br />
Traralgon, Victoria<br />
Australia.<br />
4th May, 1971.<br />
SIR-My congratulations to Professor Richardson on putting British forestry into its<br />
proper perspective (<strong>Review</strong> De'c. 1970). This, and E. R. Huggard's article (<strong>Review</strong> Sept.<br />
1970) should be required reading for all British foresters, especially those in the private<br />
sector. Perhaps it is no coincidence that they are both from the same school of forestry,<br />
and must surely augur well for the quality of their future graduates. Moving from private<br />
British forestry to industrial plantation forestry in Australia, I can only agree that for too<br />
long forestry in Britain has been a "rural pursuit" and "cottage industry".<br />
However, Professor Richardson's evidence for a flood of low cost material into world<br />
markets is not entirely convincing. Concerning tropical hardwoods I doubt whether his<br />
two big "ifs" (top of p. 327) are as capable of such an early solution as he hopes. With<br />
regard to man-made forests the majority of these are being planted to satisfy existing<br />
needs within countries rather than as a basis for export industry, New Zealand, of course,<br />
being a notable ,exception. While many sub-tropical man-made forests can produce spectacular<br />
yields there are still relatively small areas being planted. It has been estimated by<br />
FAO (World Symposium on Man-Made Forests, Canberra, 1967) that the average yield<br />
from the 80 million hectares of man-made forests to be planted between 1966-1985 will<br />
be only 5m 3 /hectare/year. This is dU'e to the preponderance of planting in the North<br />
Temperate zone, particularly the D.S., Japan and Europe.<br />
British forestry which should be able to produce at least 10m 3 /hectare/year, and hopefully<br />
more, is thus in a relatively better position than most of its potential competitors.<br />
The only way to capitalise on this inherently favourable position is to introduce the<br />
massive economies of scale practised in other countries. New Zealand, of similar land<br />
area, is planning in terms of 60,000 hectare HP. radiata equivalent" forest units. Considering<br />
differences in growth rate I would agree with Professor Richardson's assertion of<br />
100,000 hectares-plus for Britain. This will certainly need a radical rethink in terms of<br />
existing land use but I believe this to be an essential and long-overdue exercise.<br />
The position of the private woodland (sic) owner is as usual the most difficult to<br />
resolve. A suitably placed owner could certainly participate in these large production<br />
units provided his individual blocks were not less than, say, 500 hectares and could thus<br />
accommodate the intensive mechanisation necessary to reduce costs to an acceptable level.<br />
The smaller owner may be able to find his own salvation, either in the creation of<br />
Professor Richardson's "resorts" (as some notable owners already have), or encourage<br />
acquisition by local authorities for recreation and amenity management. This latter solution<br />
has already found limited application in areas of great public pressure.<br />
The many areas of private woodland that do not fit the above categories present a<br />
difficult problem. Present attitudes and fiscal structures merely encourage the pretence<br />
that "economic forestry" is possible with such areas, and have prolonged the establishment<br />
of scattered woodlands of myriad species. Perhaps the Dedication Scheme has been<br />
too favourable for too long. If "strate'gic reserve" is an outmoded concept for British<br />
state forestry should it not also be so for the private sector? The war-time debt has been<br />
amply repaid. Continuation of the Dedication Scheme and present tax structure may<br />
well be desirable but in many cases must more logically be regarded as a state contribution<br />
to the maintenance of the British landscape, rather than an ultimate aid to the<br />
balance of payments.<br />
267<br />
D. J. DANBURY.
CORRESPONDENCE 269<br />
Copy of a letter from the Director, Nature Conservancy to the Editor,<br />
Daily Telegraph, 9th July, 1971.<br />
SIR-Peter Simple's attack on the <strong>Forestry</strong> Committee of Great Britain and the <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Commission (July 6th) is so contrary to ecological fact that his assertions cannot go<br />
uncorrected.<br />
Britain more than any other country in Europe has an appalling record of the destruction<br />
of our natural forest by man's greed and thoughtlessn'ess. It is almost entirely due<br />
to private forest owners and the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission that we have any substantial areas<br />
of forest left.<br />
Since the establishment of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission we have seen impressive efforts<br />
to reafforest areas of the country which once carried trees. The low fertility of these<br />
sites, and the degradation caused by man's past activities has necessarily meant the use<br />
of conifers, as these are the only tre'es which can cope with low fertility and severe<br />
exposure and make sufficient money to compensate the cost of planting.<br />
To say that the plantations are for the most part dull and hideous shows the same<br />
short-sightedness which reduced the areas being reafforested to their treeless state, and<br />
to claim that the soil is rendered unfit for any other purpose betrays an ignorance of soil<br />
ecology which is frightening, not least because the view is so commonly held.<br />
While the conversion of broadleaved woodland and scrub to conifers gives rise to<br />
some concern, because of the shortage of broadleaved woodland in this country, the<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Commission's new hardwood policy has already recognised the dangers and<br />
goes some way to remedying the situation.<br />
The reafforestation of large areas of this country, whether by private landowners or<br />
by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, is a major advance in conservation. The return of these<br />
areas to a woodland ecosystem opens up new possibilities for the future, and the conservation<br />
value of the conifer plantations themselves, particularly when they have grown<br />
through the early phase of establishment, is very much higher than is supposed by the<br />
casual visitor.<br />
The fact that the plantations also make a small profit should be a matter of pride.<br />
Does Peter Simple really think that anything would have been done to "plant trees for<br />
people" if the taxpayer had been asked to subsidise the total cost?<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
J. N. R. JEFFERS,<br />
Director, Nature Conservancy,<br />
Grange-over-Sands, Lancs.
276 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
only doomed to failure; the publication of such attempts frequently lead to complacency<br />
and a sudden drying up of further inquiry. A compromise has to be reached.<br />
The Botany Division of the T.P.N.G. Department of Forests, under John Womersley's<br />
able leadership, seem to have achieved it successfully, by bringing out accounts of the<br />
chief timber families which aim to be as botanically accurate and up-to-date as circumstances<br />
will allow, yet are produced essentially as interim accounts which are subject<br />
to more or less complete revision from time to time as knowledge increases.<br />
Mark Coode's present contribution is the first such revision of the T.P.N.G. Manual<br />
of Forest Trees, nine parts of which have so far been produced, each covering a separate<br />
family. It contains a full account of all species, including shrubs and climbers, in the<br />
Combretaceae occurring in the region from New Guinea to the Solomons, leaving out<br />
only those recorded exclusively from West New Guinea. The clear and succinct descriptions<br />
avoid use of more than the essential botanical terms, and include much field<br />
information. Each tree species is accompanied by a good full page line illustration of a<br />
flowering or fruiting twig. Good keys are provided based both on fertile and on sterile<br />
characters; the latter are essential in manuals to be used in the forest. Coode concentrates<br />
on a very thorough account of the genus Terminalia, which provides important<br />
timbers both for local and overseas markets and has undergone an ebullition of speciation<br />
in that region; of the thirty-one species in the account, four are newly described<br />
and three are yet to be named botanically; an excellent field key is provided to this<br />
difficult genus which exhibits much phenotypic variation in leaf size and shape and in<br />
indeumentum. A particularly praiseworthy feature of the book is that gaps in information<br />
and areas of uncertainty in the definition of species are emphasised rather than<br />
glossed over; this should expedite the filling of such gaps in the future.<br />
Some criticisms can inevitably be levelled at individual details; I would mention the<br />
following in particular: The introductory definition of the family is relatively more<br />
technical and uses terms (infundibuliform, patelliform, for instance) that may dissuade<br />
foresters from proceeding further; it is a pity that a comment on the field characters<br />
of the chief tree genera is not included here; it is a pity also that no description of<br />
the uses to which the timbers are put in New Guinea is included in the introduction. In<br />
the introduction to Terminalia a separate list of field characters is included towards the<br />
end, far separated from the botanical definition; these might better be amalgamated;<br />
some field characters, such as the striking colour of the senescent leaves and the handsome<br />
convex plank buttresses, are 'Only mentioned, and this not always, in individual<br />
species descriptions. The manual would be much easier to use if the key diagnostic<br />
characters for each taxon were picked out in bold or italic print or underlined as has<br />
been done, for instance, in Corner's Wayside Trees of Malaya. It is unfortunate that the<br />
.two artists have adopted different styles of shading; in Damaris Pierce's clear drawings,<br />
using the technique adopted by Miss van Crevel in Flora Malesiana, there is no<br />
difficulty in distinguishing shading from hairs, but Terry Nolan's stippling is confusing<br />
in this respect. One final point: it can be dangerous to suggest specific epithets in the<br />
text for species which, presumably owing to lack of material, are yet to be published.<br />
All in all, though, this is a useful contribution and should prove itself an invaluable<br />
field companion to foresters.<br />
DR. P. S. ASHTON<br />
The Evergreen Forests of Malawi. By J. D. CHAPMAN and F. WHITE. <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, Oxford. 1970. Not priced.<br />
CHAPMAN, a botanically-minded forester with 13 years' service in Malawi, and White, a<br />
herbarium botanist who has done a good deal of field work in different parts of Africa,<br />
have combined to describe the evergreen forests of Malawi in 190 pages, with eight text<br />
figures and 60 photographs. Descriptive ecology is combined with sound taxonomy and<br />
discursive phytogeography.<br />
The evergreen forests of Malawi today are fragmentary and not very extensive. There<br />
is evidence that within re'cent times they occupie·d much larger are'as than their scattered<br />
remnants do today. They have been destroyed by cultivation or felling for timber and<br />
charcoal and, on a much larger scale, by fires started by man, and have been replaced<br />
for the most part by grasslands. Since 1964 Pinus patula has been planted for the Vipya<br />
pulpwood project at the rate of at least 4,050 he'ctares a ye'ar, mainly on these grasslands,<br />
but also on deliberately cleared natural forest areas.
REVIEWS<br />
l'he chapters by White on Floristics and Plant Geography and on Classification are<br />
wide ranging and perceptive. Chapman's descriptions of the forests in ten geographical<br />
sections are detailed and will be'come incre'asingly valuable to local ecologists who, in<br />
future years, want to know what the forests were like in the 1960s. The authors stress<br />
the scientific importance of preserving examples of these natural forests. At present most<br />
of the forest remnants are in national parks or in forest reserves constituted primarily<br />
for the prevention of erosion, flooding and desiccation. The responsibility for conservation<br />
thus rests firmly on the Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game, who should be encouraged<br />
to resist the temptation of replacing all the natural forests by fast-growing<br />
plantations.<br />
Foresters and agriculturalists, biologists and geographe'rs, in Malawi and neighbouring<br />
countries will find much of interest in this book for many years, and should be grateful<br />
that the publishers did not insist on a more concise treatment.<br />
R. W.J.KEAY<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> In Northern Ireland. Command Paper 550, 1970. Her Majesty's Stationery<br />
Office, Belfast. 35p.<br />
SINCE 1921 the Government of Northern Ireland has operated its own forest policy,<br />
administered by the <strong>Forestry</strong> Division of the Ministry of Agriculture. The current aim,<br />
on the policy formulated in 1945, is to establish 150,000 acres of productive forestry by<br />
the end of this century. The State would hold by far the largest share of this. Already it<br />
has 100,000 acres of plantations, against 30,000 on private estates. At its current rate of<br />
planting, 4,500 acres annually, the present target will be achieved by the year 1975.<br />
The obje'ct of this ne'w Command Paper, presented to the Northern Ireland Parliament<br />
in November 1970, is simple. The Government proposes to double its target, aiming to<br />
secure 300,000 acres of well-managed plantations by the ye'ar 2000. It estimates that<br />
private owners can increase their acreage to 75,000, while the State can contribute<br />
225,000 or three-quarters of the whole.<br />
The reasoiiS1or this increase are well set out. Land is available in the poorer, hilly<br />
and peaty districts of western Ulster that can produce far more under timber crops<br />
than by hill farming. Illustrative yields, at present prices, are £7.5 per acre per annum<br />
for stock raising, contrasted with £40 for afforestation. The demand for timber exceeds<br />
supplies, and is likely to do so for many years. The markets are well diversified among<br />
sawmilling, chipboard, and pulpwood. The provision of local employment, currently for<br />
some 1,000 workers, is important, especially in the w'est of the province, which has few<br />
industries. If planting ce'ases, employment will inevitably decrease through the impact of<br />
mechanisation on harvesting; only an expanded planting programme can raise the present<br />
level. An ultimate figure of 9,000 people, in the woods, hills, and tourist industry, is<br />
suggested.<br />
Even when the expanded programme is realised, forests will only occupy 9 per cent of<br />
Northern Ireland's 3.3 million acres. Provision is, however made for five-yearly reviews<br />
of the target figure, which can be amended upwards or downwards in the light of<br />
agricultural prosperity and other economic factors. In round figures there will still be a<br />
million acres of "poor marginal land," or worse, that could be afforested later.<br />
The report makes no firm forecasts of likely economic returns, but from the Balance<br />
Sheet included it appears that 100,000 acres of plantations have been established for<br />
£24 million, an average of £240 per acre. Much of this is high-yielding Sitka spruce,<br />
which under the favourable climate and a modern regime of ploughing, fertilisation and<br />
skilled thinning, promises excellent outputs-possibly averaging 10 tons of timber per<br />
acre per annum throughout th'e rotation.<br />
The whole programme is lucidly set out, and its originators can be commended for<br />
saying so frankly: "We have a sound project here, let's double its size." We hope they<br />
will be given the funds and support they need to promote forestry where it can prove so<br />
profitable. Its values for recreation and amenity are rightly stressed in a re'gion for<br />
tourist attractions and pioneer work on National Forest Parks.<br />
H. L.EDLIN<br />
Joinery, by C. H. Tack. Publis'hed by F.P.R.L. and H.M.S.O.. £1.<br />
THIS YEAR The Worshipful Company of Carpenters, one of the great City of London<br />
Livery Companies, joined with the British Woodwork Manufacturers' Association, and<br />
7*<br />
277
REVIEWS 281<br />
Not much new research work is reported. Enplacement, pruning and thinning trials<br />
with Eucalyptus grandis are mentioned, as also sample plot and yield table work with<br />
Pinus Kesiya and Eucalyptus grandis. Progress was made with studies in wood structure,<br />
properties, handling, sawing and seasoning of small logs of Eucalyptus grandis. In the<br />
course of recent years the Department has started up a considerable range of research<br />
projects, using modern methods and installing some quite expensive equipment, with<br />
the intention of solving problems of afforestation with untried exotics before they arose<br />
on an industrial scale. Unfortunately the highly qualified and locally experienced staff<br />
needed for all these projects has been leaving, and the Department now records difficulty<br />
in finding suitable replacements and for keeping the projects going. This has been the<br />
case particularly with the Tree Improvement Research centre at Kitwe.<br />
The Government of Zambia's policy of carrying development into the remoter rural<br />
areas n1eans that a part of the Department's energies has been devoted to establishing<br />
and tending little local-supply plantations for peasants and subsistence cultivators. It<br />
seems a pity that the Department has to pretend to make these appear economic by<br />
selling the produce. The Government during the year made changes in the system of<br />
administration in the provinces, and through shuffles in Government portfolios the<br />
Department was twice transferred from one Ministry to another. This held up the<br />
declaration of new forest reserves; but none of the gazetted reserves, apparently, was<br />
lost-"the Department's field staff once again made a fine job of the unspectacular but<br />
important job of protecting over 20,000 square miles of forest estate" says the report.<br />
The Baikiaea plurijuga hardwood forests in the southern province continued to be<br />
exploited (to the extent of 2,343,000 cubic feet in the round) for railway sleepers and<br />
parquet flooring; without, however, much hope of replacement except by way of minimum<br />
girth limits and fire protection in selected areas. A fresh concession area was<br />
surveyed and planned in Seskake district, west of the Zambezi river. These dry west<br />
bank forests also yielded 250,000 cubic feet of sawlogs, mainly Ptercarpus angolensis,<br />
during the year.<br />
At the other end of the country, in the heavy "miombo" woodlands to the west of the<br />
Copperbelt, 1,562,000 cubic feet of Brachystegia/Julbernadi sawlogs were felled for the<br />
mining industry, again without organised silvicultural measures to replace or improve<br />
the growing stock, since it is hoped to supply the industry's future requirements from<br />
the plantations already mentioned.<br />
Staffing difficulties also affected the Forest College. The training programme for several<br />
cadres had to be curtailed. Moreover "a further year is reported without progress in<br />
training Zambians to be professional forest officers" writes the Chief Conservator.<br />
The Bee-Keeping sectipn also cut its programme. Ste'ady progress was made, however,<br />
with the Department's herbarium work and with the production of a fairly large-scale<br />
map of the vegetation of this large country.<br />
One gains an impression from reading this report that the loss of so many experienced<br />
and qualified men is beginning to make itself felt. During the long period of the mining<br />
boom the Department started up almost too many lines of activity, using highly<br />
sophisticated methods. The men remaining and their promoted subordinates are making<br />
a most commendable job of keeping so many of these lines going.<br />
C.E.D.<br />
Annual Report of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Service of Mauritius for 1968.<br />
FORESTRY in Mauritius appears to be fraught with uncertainty. The <strong>Forestry</strong> Service<br />
(the old Forest Department has newly become a diVlision of the Ministry of Agricul,ture<br />
and Natucral Resources) ha,s been hard at work replanting forest land devastated by the<br />
cyclones of 1960. In March 1968 "practically all the forest plantations" in the dependency<br />
of R!odvigues were ann'ihilated by yet another cyclone. Government during the year<br />
spent Rupees 3.9 million on the repair and maintenance of forests. However, jt has still<br />
not proved possible to make any final allocation of land to forestry, so as to provide<br />
security of tenure. Out of 66,000 arpents of "Crown Forest Estate," 15,000 arpents have<br />
recently been "allocated to non-forestry uses," mainly tea-planting. (1 arpent = 1.043<br />
acres).<br />
L,and-use planning must be dtifficult in a mountainous island with a total extent of<br />
750 square miles and a population of 800,000. Priorifties must be very hard to decide.<br />
Meanwhile the Report cover,s a year of great activity. An area of 1,625 arpents was
284 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
There is already a well established harvesting and processing industry in the private<br />
sector. This is shown by the fact that less than one per cent of the timber harvested was<br />
exported in log form. During the year the Tanga plywood factory improved production<br />
but log supply difficulties were encountered by the Moshi plywood factory and the match<br />
factory. There was an overall increase in the quantity of timber harvested due to an<br />
improvement in demand from both local and export markets. Pterocarpus angolensis (a<br />
high quality furniture wood) provided the greatest volume, most of it from unreserved<br />
land. It was followed by Podocarpus spp. (utility softwoods), Brachylaena hutchinsii (a<br />
decorative flooring and carving timber) and Brachystegia spp. (utility hardwoods). The<br />
37t per cent increase in Brachystegia from 1967 is attributed to greater building activity<br />
and it is encouraging that this difficult but plentiful hardwood is justifying the intensive<br />
research and development lavished on it in the past.<br />
Timber sales yielded the Division revenue of Shs.(T) 2,649,501 (approximately<br />
£154,000) and other produce (including poles and firewood) Shs.(T) 1,278,281 (approx.<br />
£74,000), a total of Shs.(T) 3,927,782 (approx. £228,000). Expenditure was Shs.(T)<br />
10,334,639 (approx. £600,850). In other words, like most <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries,<br />
Tanzania was still in the investment stage of developing and expanding its forest<br />
resources. Timber exports brought the country Shs.(T) 9,477,280 (approx. £551,000) in<br />
foreign currency but imports of wood and wood products cost Shs.(T) 77,746,160<br />
(approx. £4,520,000). Tanzania cannot afford to prolong this situation indefinitely and<br />
the role of the Forest Division both in saving imports and paying for them requires<br />
to be urged at every opportunity.<br />
Development of the forest estate progressed under the current Five-Year Development<br />
Plan. 6,658 acres of exotic softwoods were planted (plus a field scale trial of 436 acres)<br />
and 921 acres of fine and utility hardwoods were established. 2,025 acres of East African<br />
camphorwood were brought under tending for the first time while further tending was<br />
given to 74,000 acres of established plantations and over 22,000 acres of natural<br />
regeneration.<br />
The formation of a Road Unit in the Northern Circle was a commendable step to<br />
"relieve project managers of the extra work on road planning and construction, thereby<br />
giving them more time in carrying out cultural operations ..." 'Planning for logging<br />
and extraction in the plantations coming to maturity was given priority and plantation<br />
mapping from aerial photographs was the primary work of the three survey teams and<br />
drafting office. Assessment of forest land to locate areas suitable for timber growing was<br />
carried out in most parts of the country while inventories were undertaken in four<br />
major exotic softwood plantations to determine the sawlog volume available. Work on<br />
permanent sample plots in all softwood areas was completed and data processing began.<br />
These are some of the main features of a detailed, interesting and well-written report<br />
which shows a progressive Forest Division becoming commercially orientated to meet<br />
its country's needs of timber. Space does not allow discussion of the Division's research<br />
in silviculture, beeke-eping and timber properties, or its education, training, extension<br />
and information work, all of which were important supports to the Division's main<br />
effort of developing the nation's forest resources to the fulL One important feature,<br />
however, seems to underline the Division's determination to grow in efficiency,<br />
namely, the attention being given to worker training in addition to the training of graded<br />
staff. It is clear that the ten young Tanzians who returned during the- year from professional<br />
education overseas have, along with their colleagues already working in the<br />
Division, a thoroughly worthwhile task before them.<br />
R.G.S.<br />
Annual Report 1968.69: Division of Forest Produds, C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne,<br />
Australia. Pp. 78.<br />
AFTER 40 years of forest products research throughout the world, the C.S.I.R.O. appears<br />
to have little doubt about future needs. As announced in the previous annual report<br />
some 30 acres have been purchased as a future site, an approach road has now been<br />
constructed and some plantations planted. The total budget is not stated but, as outside<br />
assistance of $102,000 amounted to 6.9 per cent of available funds yearly, expenditure<br />
must approach $1,500,000. Presumably this is greater than in the previous year as the<br />
professional staff has been increased.
REVIEWS 285<br />
In addition to administrative and scientific services the Laboratory now consists of<br />
six main sections, viz, physiology and microstructure, paper science, physics, engineering,<br />
preservative and timber conversion. In the first mentioned section it is of interest to<br />
note the work being done on the modification of the structure and chemistry of the<br />
cell wall by thinning, fertiliser application, heartwood formation, bacteria attack, etc.<br />
The development of electron microscopic studies is well illustrated by one very excellent<br />
photograph. Paper Science includes, in addition to investigations on the raw materials<br />
and processes that are used to make paper, a programme of research into the mechanical<br />
properties, moisture relations, warping, etc., of fibreboard and even a survey of apple<br />
containers.<br />
The Physics Section deals with wood-water relationships, creep, surface properties<br />
and the deformation induced by mechanical or moisture changes. It also has an<br />
operational research unit which co-operates with the Timber Conversion Section in<br />
research on the drying of sawn and round timber, veneer peeling, finger jointing and<br />
bark removal. One interesting aspect of the Timber Conversion Unit is a study of<br />
methods to avoid damage, resulting from the release of internal stresses, during the<br />
felling and storage of logs.<br />
The Engineering Section is concerned with strength grading and the design of<br />
structures built of solid timber, plywood and glued laminations. It is working towards<br />
the drafting of a Timber Engineering Design Code. In work carried out by the Preservative<br />
Section it is of interest to note that a successful treatment has been developed<br />
for the protection of marine piling and for wood in cooling towers. Also that a method<br />
has been discovered for preventing posts, treated with copper-chrome arsenic salts, from<br />
glowing to destruction when in contact with grass fires.<br />
This very interesting summary of the work of the forest products division contains a<br />
list of publications issued in 1968. Unfortunately there is no indication of where copies<br />
of this report may be obtained or of its cost.<br />
A.V.T.<br />
Forest Insect and Disease Survey, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service Annual Report for<br />
the year 1969.<br />
NO VERY WIDESPREAD epidemics of either insect pests or diseases occurred in Canadian<br />
forests during 1969, but some caused severe damage in various localities and others were<br />
sufficiently prevalent to give rise to anxiety.<br />
Among the insects the most important were the spruce budworm (Choristoneura<br />
jUfflijerana), the jack-pine budworm (C. pinus pinus) and the larch sawfly (Pristiphora<br />
erichsonii). There were outbreaks of the first of these in various localities in the eastern<br />
provinces, and very large' populations persisted in New Brunswick. Che'mical control<br />
programmes are now being organised by several provinces with co-operation from the<br />
Survey. Jack-pine budworm populations increased in parts of Ontario and Quebec, but<br />
declined in Manitoba and western Ontario. Infestations by the larch sawfly were generally<br />
lighter than in recent years except in Manitoba and Ontario.<br />
Other insects of importance stressed in the report were the eastern hemlock looper<br />
(Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria) , and the birch casebearer (Coleophora fuscidinella),<br />
outbreaks of which occurred in Newfoundland; the saddled prominent moth (Heterocampa<br />
guttivitta), a defoliator of harqwoods in Ontario and Quebec; the large aspen<br />
tortrix (Choristoneura conflictana) in Manitoba; the spruce beetle (Dendroctonus obesus),<br />
severe local outbreaks of which occurred in parts of Alberta and British Columbia; and<br />
the green-striped forest looper (Melanolophia imitata), a defoliator mainly of conifers,<br />
the black-headed budworm (Acleris variana), on various conifers, and the western hemlock<br />
looper (Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa), all of which were on the increase in British<br />
Columbia.<br />
Of the more important pathogens, the beech bark disease (Nectria coccinea) caused<br />
high mortality in the Maritime Provinces, and many surviving trees are cankered;<br />
scleroderris canker (Scleroderris lagerbergii) was severe in pine plantations in Ontario<br />
and Quebec; jack-pine suffered from swe'et-fern blister rust (Cronartium comptoniae) in<br />
Quebec, especially in plantations where sweet-fern, rather than sweet gale, is its alternate<br />
host; atropeIlis canker (Atropellis piniphila) was prevelant in Alberta and the neighbouring<br />
territories, and seems to show no preferences between jack pine, lodgepole pine and
286 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
their hybrids; in the same region 12 per cent of the trembling aspen trees were infected<br />
by hypoxylon canker (Hypoxylon mammatum).<br />
The Dutch elm disease (Ceratocystis ulmi) continued to be of importance and to spread.<br />
The principal vector is the bark-beetle Hylurgopinus ru{ipes, but the introduced European<br />
bark-beetle Scolytus multistriatus is extending its range and was found in Quebec for the<br />
first time.<br />
In British Columbia special studies of dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium spp.), which<br />
are considered to be second in importance only to decay organisms, were initiated.<br />
F. G. BROWNE<br />
Hong Kong. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, 1969·70.<br />
FORESTRY plays a negligible part in the Hong Kong economy; it does however fulfil a<br />
very important role in the stated policy of preserving and improving the Colony's<br />
vegetable cover. There is no formally declared forest estate, although virtually all the hill<br />
lands covering some 300 square miles are Ctown land and include some 15,900 acres of<br />
woodland of which 13,200 acres are plantations.<br />
The Division's chief problem appears to be protection against fire. During the year<br />
under review some 342 acres of plantations were established (Table 10); on the debit<br />
side some 275 acres (Table 9) were destroyed by fire. On these figures afforestation in<br />
Hong Kong nlust be a very unrewarding task.<br />
In addition to its afforestation activities the Division is also responsible for the pro..<br />
vision of countryside amenities and wildlife conservation.<br />
E.W.M.<br />
South Australia. Annual Report, Woods and Forests Department, 1968-69.<br />
A REVIEW of any South Australia Annual Report is a comparatively simple task; firstly,<br />
the Conservator presents his own review or synopsis of the main features in the Report<br />
on the opening pages and, secondly, it revolves almost entirely round the "man-made"<br />
forest, in this case, the silviculture of P. radiatae The' 1967-68 Rejort (C.F.R. Vo!' 49 (2))<br />
forecast a continuing deterioration in the softwood demand; this appears to have<br />
materialised; the Report now under review, however, fore'casts "subsequently better<br />
figures" for 1969-70.<br />
The total area of Forest Reserves at the end of the year was 290,516 acres with a<br />
further 1,956 acres in process of reservation. This includes no less than 155,000 acres of<br />
softwood plantations, of which 8,000 acres were established during the year as against a<br />
target of 200,000 acres.<br />
As is to be expected from an expanding forest estate, the total production of softwood<br />
increased by 8,000,000 super feet, the slight reduction in timber for sawlogs<br />
being nlore than compensated by a 12,000,000 super feet increase in pulpwood<br />
production.<br />
Imports totalled 42,652,759 super feet of softwood timber and 13,746,152 super feet<br />
of hardwoods as against a total home production from State and private forests of<br />
231,105,956 super feet of softwood sawlogs and slightly less than 500,000 super feet of<br />
all types of hardwoods.<br />
In our review of last year's report we asked when the Department's clonal orchards<br />
would be in production. In this report comes the answer-200 lbs. of seed were harvested<br />
and sown during the year under review and it is estimated that a further 600 lbs. would<br />
be available in the following year. A project tackled and successfully established, a development<br />
of great significance in future establishment as it should eliminate the undue<br />
proportion of "wolf trees," excessive spiral grain, etc., which were features of earlier<br />
plantations.<br />
An interesting section of the report is devoted to the work done in collaboration with,<br />
or with facilities supplied to, other organisations, viz. The Southern .Regional <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
Research Institute, C.S.I.R.O. Divisions of Soils and Forest Products, University of<br />
Adelaide, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, the Australian National University and<br />
Melbourne University. Close liaison of this kind must be of considerable benefit to<br />
foresters in the Department, to research workers, to teaching staff and students.<br />
Commonwe'alth Foresters will note with regret that this is the last report to be written<br />
by Mr. Brian Bednall, retiring Conservator of Forests, a post he has held for the past
REVIEWS 287<br />
22 years. Mr. Bednall has attended the last five <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Conferences.<br />
On all occasions he has made significant contributions to both technical and social<br />
activities: always a very popular delegate.<br />
E.W.M.<br />
F'orests Commission, Victoria, Autsrali'a-Annual Report, 1969-70.<br />
THE REPORT opens with a quotation from Schlich's "Manual of <strong>Forestry</strong>" on what is now<br />
generally known as "multiple use management." The opening paragraphs go on to<br />
describe in broad outline the problems confironting the Commission in its declared<br />
policy of mul'tiple purpose management embracing recreation and conservation.<br />
Once again the Chairman indicates a deteriorating financial situation. Although the<br />
excess of appropriated expenditure over appropriated revenue is only $A328,861 he is<br />
far from happy about the use of the <strong>Forestry</strong> Fund to meet shortages caused by<br />
inadequate financial provision.<br />
The area of reserved forest shows little change; there was an excision of 14,600 acres<br />
for National P'arks but a compensating addition is to be affected.<br />
There are at present 89 forest parks, scenic reserves, etc., comprising approximately<br />
63,716 acres of reserved forests; not a very large area when compared with the total of<br />
5,656,671 aores of reserved forest in the State.<br />
Operations in native hardwood forests continue to be of primary importance. A total<br />
of 33,740 acres were silviculturally treated including the regeneration of 10,235 acres<br />
by vafious methods.<br />
Softwood plantations established during the year amounted to some 6,131 acres, of<br />
which no less than 6,060 acres were P. Iradiata planted under the <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-States<br />
Softwood <strong>Forestry</strong> Agreement, thus achieving the prescribe'd target of 38,000 acres by the<br />
end of the fourth year of the Agreement. Proposals for a new <strong>Commonwealth</strong>-State<br />
Softwood <strong>Forestry</strong> Agreement were under discussion during the year whereby the<br />
progress of planting in Victoria would be stepped up to 15,000 acres per annum from<br />
July 1971.<br />
The dominance of hardwoods is again emphasised in the Statement of Output for<br />
the year:<br />
Sawlogs<br />
Pulpwood<br />
Hardwood<br />
405,650,025 super it<br />
9,169,351 cubic ft<br />
So/twood<br />
47,823,293 super ft<br />
4,737,005 cubic ft<br />
As in most Australian R'eports the fire problem receives extensive coverage. No less<br />
than six separate appendices are devoted to fire statistics. Total area burnt was 12,576<br />
a'cres in 304 outbreaks.<br />
The Research section appears to divide its activities equally between softwood<br />
(P. radlata) and hardwood (E. regnans) problems. The Sirex Wood Wasp search and<br />
control activities continued. Although a spread of infestation is reported there are signs<br />
that parasitic control is proving effective.<br />
The Report is well produced, contains much of interest and many exce'llent photographs.<br />
The only criticism, and it is not peculiar to Victoria, is why must so many<br />
Forest Authorities devise their own set of appendices and statistical forms? How much<br />
easier was a reviewer's task in the days of the universally accepted Standard forms.<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Development Corporation: Report and Accounts 1970.<br />
E.W.M.<br />
AT 31.12.70 there were 189 projects with total estimated commitments of £171.6 million.<br />
New investments during the year totalled £18,869,591 comprising 22 new projects costing<br />
£9,589,493 and supplementary investments on existing projects £9,280,098. Impressive<br />
figures no doubt but on examination very disappointing to a forester; the 22 new projects<br />
included no forestry operation; existing projects include only four forestry operations.<br />
Guyana Timbers is reported to be of doubtful profitability and due to be reviewed;<br />
most successful project is Usutu PU1lp Co. Ltd., SwaziIand, which declared a divide·nd of<br />
24 per cent during the year; on a smaller scale the Pacific Lumber Co. Ltd., Fiji, showed
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 291<br />
ARCHER, G. R., B.Sc.For., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Mt. Hagen, Papua and New<br />
Guinea. 1965.<br />
ARGYLE, M. C., B.Se., Yew Tree Cottage, Wootton, Nr. Canterbury, Kent. 1948.<br />
ARMITAGE, F. B., B.Sc., M.A.(Oxon), 828 Island Road, Victoria, B.e., Canada. 1947.<br />
ARMOUR, M. R., Forest Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, P.O. Box 8111, Causeway,<br />
Rhodesia. 1957.<br />
ARNOTT, J. T., B.Sc., M.Sc., Forest Research Laboratory, 506 W. Burnside Road,<br />
Victoria, B.C., Canada. 1969.<br />
ASSOCIATION TECHNIQUE INTERNATIONALE DES BOIS TROPICAUX, 45 bis<br />
Avenue de la Belle Gabrielle, 94 N ogent sur Marne, France. 1970.<br />
ASSAM, Chief Conservator of Forests, Shillong, Assam. 1930.<br />
ATKINSON, G. A., For.Ccrt. <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Tasman Pulp and Paper Company<br />
Ltd., Kawerau, New Zealand. 1958.<br />
ATTWOOD, L., P.O. Box 452, Umtali, Rhodesia. 1957.<br />
AUNG DIN, M.A.(Oxon), B.Sc.(Hons), <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, F.A.O. Headquarters, Via<br />
delle Terme di Caracalla" ROlTIC, Italy. 1953.<br />
AUSTRALIA: LIBRARIAN, <strong>Forestry</strong> and Timber Bureau, Canberra A.C.T., Australia.<br />
1964.<br />
AUSTRALIA: NEW SOUTH WALES COMMISSION, The Assenlbly Building,<br />
Margaret Street, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia. 1922.<br />
AUSTRALIA: QUEENSLAND FORESTRY DEPARTMENT, Box 944, G.P.O.,<br />
Brisbane Q 4001, Queensland, Australia. 1952.<br />
AUSTRALIA: SOUTH, Conservator of Forests, Woods and Forests Department,<br />
Adelaide, South Australia. 1929.<br />
AUSTRALIA: VICTORIA, The <strong>Forestry</strong> ConlDlissioners, 453 Latrobe Street, Melbourne,<br />
Victoria, Australia. 1922.<br />
AUSTRALIA: WESTERN, Forests Department, 3rd and 4th Floors, R. & I. Bank<br />
Building, 54-58 Barrack Street, Perth, Western Australia. 1930.<br />
AUSTRALIAN FORESTRY LEAGUE (Victoria Branch), 24 Studlcy Avenue, Kew,<br />
Victoria, Australia. 1921.<br />
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, <strong>Forestry</strong> Departmcnt, Box 4 P.O., Canberra<br />
A.C.T., Australia. 1965.<br />
AUSTRALIAN NEWSPRINT, MELBOURNE, Springvale Road, Victoria, Australia.<br />
1948.<br />
AYLIFFE, R., The Garden House, Richington Way, Seaford, Sussex. 1952.<br />
AYRES, G. C., "Rosehall," Whins of Milton, Stirling. 1950.<br />
BAHAMAS The, The Colonial Secretary, Government of the Bahamas, Nassau, Bahamas,<br />
West Indies. 1923.<br />
BAHARUDDIN BIN HAll GHAZALI, Forest Department, Kuala Lumpur, West<br />
Malaysia. 1965.<br />
BAIDOE, J. F., <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, P.O. Box 1917, Kumasi, Ghana. 1969.<br />
BAIGENT, L. E. H., Timber Merchant and <strong>Forestry</strong> Manager, G.P.O. Box 97, Nelson,<br />
New Z'ealand. 1953.<br />
BAIGENT, P. L., <strong>Forestry</strong> Director, H. Baigent and Sons Limited, P.O. Box 97, Nelson,<br />
New Zealand. 1954.<br />
BAILEY, E. C. J., B.Sc.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and<br />
Co-operatives, P.M.B. 3022. Kano, Kano State, N. Nigeria. 1966.<br />
BAIN, V. L., Dip.For.(Ran.), "Westbourne", 18 Ruxley Close, West Ewell, Surrey. 1926.<br />
BAKER, G. S., B.Sc.Econ., 6 Farmcroft, Northfleet, Kent. 1971.<br />
BALTAXE, R., M.A.(For.) Oxon., Federal Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.M.B. 5054,<br />
Ibadan, Nigeria. 1971.<br />
BALYAHA, M. B. M., Forest Ranger, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda. 1963.<br />
BAMBERGERS (TIMBER AND PLYWOOD) LIMITED, Bamberger House, St. Cross<br />
Street, London, E.C.1. 1964.<br />
BANERJEE, J., B.Sc.(Hons.), B.Com., Dip.For., "Aranyak", P.O. Gobardanga, (24<br />
Pargs), West Bengal, India. 1966.<br />
BANYARD, S. G., B.Se., Dip.Aero.Photo Int., Lecturer, I.T.C., Delft, Holland. 1966.<br />
BAPTISTE, E., Forest Guard, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Roseau, Dominica, W.I. 1953.<br />
BARNETT ESTATES LIMITED, The Manager, Montego Bay, Jamaica, West Indies.<br />
1959,
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 295<br />
CANADIAN FORESTRY ASSOCIATION, Canada Cement Building, 4795 St. Catherine<br />
Street West, Montreal 6 P.Q., Canada. 1924.<br />
CANADIAN CAR, Woodlands Operation, Box 67, Fort WiIliam, Ontario, Canada. 1969.<br />
CANT, P. R., For.Dip., Southern Rhodesia <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, P.O. Box 59, Melsetter,<br />
Rhodesia. 1951.<br />
CANUSA LIMITED, Timber Brokers, Villiers House, 41-47 Strand, London, W.C.2.<br />
1947.<br />
CARDEN, C. R., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), clo Department of Forests, Hoskins, West New<br />
Britain, T.P.N.G. 1971.<br />
CARLISLE, Dr. A., B.Sc.(Bangor), Biology Section, Federal Department of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
and Rural Development, Petawawa Experimental Station, Chalk River, Ontario,<br />
Canada. 1948.<br />
CARLSEN, C. S., B.C.F.S., 1018 Collenson Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.<br />
1956.<br />
CARMICHAEL, W., B.Sc.For., Dip.For., F.L.S., 60 Kirk Brae, Edinburgh EH16 6HU.<br />
1949.<br />
CARSON, G. L., C.B.E., B.Se.For.(Edin.), Conservator of Forests, Forest Department,<br />
Sandakan, Sabah. 1938.<br />
CARTWRIGI-IT, R. N., Dip.L.A., A.I.L.A., 42 Station Close, Riding Mill, Hexham,<br />
Northumberland. 1960.<br />
CARVER, J. E. A., M.A.(Oxon), C.F.S.(retd.), 60 Margaret Maytom Avenue, Durban<br />
North, Natal, South Africa. 1926.<br />
CARVER, M. W., M.E.F.A., Flat 7, 7 Hedgeley Avenue, East Malvern, Victoria, 3145,<br />
Australia. 1959.<br />
CATER, J. C., M.B.E., B.A., Deputy Chairman Osutu Pulp Co., Santa Estates, P.O. Box<br />
46, Dullstrom, East Transvaal, South Africa. 1945.<br />
CENTRO DE DOCUMENTACIO TECNICA, CDT-IIA, C.P. 406 Nova Lisboa,<br />
Angola. 1966.<br />
CEYLON FOREST DEPARTMENT,P.O. Box 509, Colombo, 'Ceylon. 1950.<br />
CHAFFEY, D. R., B.Sc., M.Se., Land Resources Division, Directorate of Overseas<br />
Surveys, Tohvorth Towers, Surbiton, Surrey. 1968.<br />
CHALI(, Dr. L., M.A., D.Phil., C.F.S.(retd.), 33 Belsyre Court, Woodstock Road,<br />
Oxford. 1924.<br />
CHALMERS, W. S., B.Se.(Aber.), Research Fellow, University of West Indies, St.<br />
Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago. 1957.<br />
CHAMBERS, W. P. C., Poppins, Cross-in-Hand, Heathfield, Sussex. 1929.<br />
CHAMPION, Sir Harry, C.I.E., D.Se., M.A., I.F.S.(retd.), Professor Emeritus (Oxon),<br />
Windrush, Boar's Hill, Oxford. 1926.<br />
CHANDLER, W. G., M.B.E., B.Se.For., General Manager, A.P.M. Forests Limited,<br />
Southgate, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 1931.<br />
CHAPMAN, G. W., M.B.E., M.A., Danallt-y-Gog, Conwyl Elfed, Carmarthen. 1932.<br />
CHAPMAN, E., B.Sc., Silviculturist, Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1956.<br />
CHAPMAN, J. D., B.Se., A.C.F., clo Forest Division, Ministry of Natural Resources,<br />
N.E. State, P.M.B. 47, Maiduguri, Nigeria. 1944.<br />
CHATURVEDI, J. K., M.Se., Forest Planning Officer, Balaghat, India. 1958.<br />
CHE DIN BIN eRE EMBY, State Forest Office, Perak, Ipoh, Malaysia. 1949.<br />
CHINNER, Lt.-Col. J. H., B.Sc.(Oxon), B.Se.(Melb.), 20 Pine Ridge, Donvale, Mel..<br />
bourne, Victoria, Australia. 1946.<br />
CHOATE, T. A. R., Forest Industry and Development Project, B.P. 369, Yaounde,<br />
Cameroon. 1967.<br />
CHONG PENG WAH, B. C. K., B.Se.Bot.&For., Dip.For., State Director of Forests,<br />
Selangor, 2334 Jalan Dato Onn, Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1962.<br />
CHRISTIAN, K. M., Forest Department, 144 Constant Spring Road, Kingston, 8,<br />
Jamaica, West Indies. 1970.<br />
CHRISTIE, A. C., D.F.C., B.Sc., D.F.D., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Fort Augustus, Inverness.<br />
1968.<br />
CHURCHILL AND SIM LIMITED, 27 Clements Lane, London, E.C.4. 1947.<br />
CIERA, P. G., Forest Department, P.D. Box 41, FJdoret, Kenya. 1970.<br />
CLARK, J. B., B.Se.For., P.O. Box 442, Lae, New Guinea. 1966.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 297<br />
CROOME, G. C. R., B.A.(Oxon), Canadian Forest Service, P.O. Box 4000, Fredericton,<br />
New Brunswick, Canada. 1962.<br />
CROWLEY, T. F., State Forester, Sancta Maria, Tourmakeady, Claremorris, Co. Mayo,<br />
Eire. 1971.<br />
CROWN, M., B.Sc.(Edin.), Pacific Logging Company, P.O. Box 10, Victoria, B.C.,<br />
Canada. 1956.<br />
CROWTHER, R. E., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), "Windrush," Pen y Graig, Aberystwyth. 1948.<br />
CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND<br />
FORESTRY, Newton Rigg, Penrith, Cumberland. 1971.<br />
CUMMING, D. G., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), clo Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of Aberdeen,<br />
S1. Machar Drive, Old Aberdeen. 1947.<br />
CURRIE, D. McD., B.Sc.(Edin..), I.F.S.(retd.), 12 Elm Road, Hereford. 1940.<br />
CURTIN, Dr. R. A., B.Sc.F., Dip.For., Ph.D., Research Officer, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Office,<br />
Taree, New Soutth Wales 2430, Australia. 1955.<br />
CYPRUS FOREST DEPARTMENT, Nicosia, Cyprus. 1939.<br />
DAGANAYASI, W.D., Forest Guard, Forest Department, Lautoka, Fiji. 1961.<br />
DAHL, R., Dip.For.(Sweden), 4 Carapook Street, Mount Gambier, South Australia. 1954.<br />
DALEY, P. A., ·B.Sc.(Wales), Forest Officer, clo Agricultural and Fisheries Department,<br />
393 Canton Road, 12th Floor, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 1948.<br />
DALKEITH, The Rt.Hon. The Earl of, D.L., M.P., Eildon Hall, Melrose, Roxburghshire.<br />
1951.<br />
DAL MONTE, G., Via Duch, Jolanda 27, 13100 Vercelli, Italy. 1970.<br />
DANBURY, D. J., B.Sc.For., M.Sc.F., Forest Research Institute, Gippshead Regional<br />
Station, 129 Argyle Street, Traralgon, Victoria, Australia. 1962.<br />
DARLING, D. D., Technical Officer, Forest Research Institute, Kelmscott, Western<br />
Australia. 1967.<br />
DATO HAJI WAN HASSAN .BIN ABDUL HALIM, State Forest Officer, Forest Department,<br />
Johore, Malaysia. 1948.<br />
DAVIDSON, D. F., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., clo British Embassy, Beirut, Lebanon. 1938.<br />
DAVIDSON, J., B.Sc.(UNE), B.Sc.For., clo Department of Forests, Keravat, New Britain,<br />
T.P.N.G. 1967.<br />
DAVIES, E. M. J., B.Sc., 8 Matilda Road, Glasgow, S.l. 1948.<br />
DAVIES, H., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), The Bursar's Office, University of Leeds, Leeds 2, Yorks.<br />
1952.<br />
DAVIES, N., B.Sc.F. Dip.For., clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Box 2667, G.P.O., Sydney,<br />
2001, New South Wales, Australia. 1950.<br />
DAVIS, C. W. R., Dip.For., Planning Forester, Peak Timbers Ltd., "Poponye," P.O.<br />
Box 31, Piggs Peak, Swaziland. 1964.<br />
DAVIS, D., B.A.For.(Oxon), I.F.S.(retd.), Priory Ford Lodge, Abbotsbrook, Boume End,<br />
Bucks. 1939.<br />
DAVIS, T. A. W., Dip.For.(Oxon), South Mullock, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire. 1924.<br />
DAWKINS, Dr. H. C., M.B.E., M.A.(Oxon), D.Phil.(Oxon), I.F.S.(retd.), <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1942.<br />
DAWSON, L. K., Chief Forester, clo P.O. Box 426, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 1954.<br />
DAY, R. J., M.A.(Oxon), M.Sc.F(UNB), Assistant Professor, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department,<br />
University of Toronto, Toronto 5, Canada. 1966.<br />
De GRACE, L. A., B.A., B.S.F., M.F., Industrial <strong>Forestry</strong> Service Limited, 1595 Fifth<br />
Avenue, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. 1950.<br />
de ROSAYRO, R. A., B.Sc.(Lon.), B.A.For.(Oxon), <strong>Forestry</strong> and Forest Industries<br />
Division, F.A.O. Headquarters, Via Terme di Caralla, Rome, Italy. 1939.<br />
DERRICK, R. G., B.Sc.For., "Southdield," Long Acre Road, Carmarthen. 1966.<br />
DESAI, H. K., B.Sc., A.I.F.C., Divisional Forest Officer, Ministry of Natural Resources,<br />
Oturkpo, B.P. State, Nigeria. 1969.<br />
DEVITT, J. G., D.Sc., B.Sc., Project Manager, Nepal, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, F.A.O.,<br />
Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy. 1949.<br />
DEWAR, R. J., e.M.G., C.B.E., B.Sc.(Edin.), 7612 Edenwood Court, Carderock Springs,<br />
Bethesda, Maryland 20034, U.S.A. 1956.<br />
DICK, J., B.Sc., Reclamation Department, Kaiser Resources Limited, P.O. Box 940,<br />
Fernie, B.C., Canada. 1966.<br />
DICKMAN, G., 7 Wentworth Avenue, Fernbank Road, Ascot, B'erks. 1970.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 299<br />
EVANS, W. R." c/o United Africa Company (Timber), Limited, United Africa House,<br />
Blackfriars Road, London, S.E.l. 1956.<br />
EYRE-HIGGINS, Lt.-Col. G., Old Bracondale, Cromer. 1948.<br />
FA'BER, H., P.O. Box 258, Marandellas, Rhodesia. 1960.<br />
FAIRBAIRN, Dr. W. A., E.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.E., 3 Ettrick Grove, Edinburgh 10. 1926.<br />
FALLOWS, N., 2511 Nicholby Drive, Limestone Gardens, Wilmington, Delaware,<br />
U,S.A. 19808. 1966.<br />
FARQUHAR, Dr. J. D., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), M.S., Ph.D., "Feldon," 3 Fairlight Road,<br />
Hythe, Kent. 1945.<br />
FARRER, R. P., M.A.(Oxon), Wayshill, Stogumber, Taunton, Somerset. 1951.<br />
FEARNSIDE, A., B.Sc.(Wales), Mount Strombo Forest, Regional Mail Bag 113, Cotter<br />
Road, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia. 1957.<br />
FELLOWS, E. S., M.Sc.For., Forest Consultant, P.O. Box 354, Fredericton, New Brunswick,<br />
Canada. 1929.<br />
FIJI FOREST DEPARTMENT, Government 'Buildings, Suva, Fiji. 1952.<br />
FINCH, A. C., M.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, P.O. Box 228, Ndola, Zambia. 1969.<br />
FINLAYSON, W., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), <strong>Forestry</strong> College, Prodromos, Cyprus. 1947.<br />
FISHWICK, R. W., B.Sc.(Wales), S.F. Project 535, F.A.O., Senior Forest Advisor, Rua<br />
Jardin Botanico, 1008-ZC 20, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 1949.<br />
FITCH, P. J., B.Sc.For., Regional Forest Office, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game,<br />
Box 5493, Limbe, Malawi. 1963.<br />
FLATEAU DICK AND COMP'ANY, 9 C'amomile Street, London, E.C.3. 1958.<br />
FLENTJE, W. M., Dip.For.(Cres.),Dip.For.(Oxon), Divisional Forest Office, <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Commission, Victoria, P.O. Box 22, Bendige, Victoria, Australia. 1946.<br />
FLETC'HER TIMBER COMPANY LIMITED, The Managing Director, 'Private Bag,<br />
Auckland, New Zealand. 1970.<br />
FLORENC'E, Dr. R. G., M.Sc.For., Ph.D.(Syd.), Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Australian<br />
National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia. 1970.<br />
FOGGIE, A., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Secretary, Society of Foresters of Great Britain, Newton<br />
House, Freuchie, Fife. 1930.<br />
FORD-RO'BERTSON, F. C., O.B.E., B.Sc., M.A., 54 Staunton Road, Oxford. 1947.<br />
FOREST MANAGEMENT LIMITED, The Managing Director, 3 Scott Road, Glenrothes,<br />
Fife. 1969.<br />
FOREST P'ROD'UCTS RESEARC'H LABORATORY, The Director, Princes Risborough,<br />
Bucks. 1971.<br />
FOULSTONE, M. S., B.Sc., Planning Officer, Devon C.C., 18 Old Tiverton Road,<br />
Crediton, Devon. 1950.<br />
FOX, A. V., B.Sc.For., Provisional Forest Service, Adamawa Province, Yola, North<br />
Eastern State, Nigeria. 1969.<br />
FOX, J. E. D., B.'Sc.,(Hons), M.F., M.Sc., Research Fellowship, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />
University of North Wales, Bangor. 1956.<br />
FRANCIS, D. A., B.Sc., F.S.F., G.B., M.E.F.A., "Grey Friars," Kinsbourne Green,<br />
Harpenden, Herts. 1947.<br />
FRANCIS, J. P., B.Se.For., P.O. Box 1073, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. 1965.<br />
FRANCOIS, J. H., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Conservator of Forests, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department,<br />
P.O. Box 527, Accra, Ghana. 1957.<br />
FRASER, H., B.Sc.(Edin.), Dalelands, Middleton Avenue, Ilkley, Yorks. 1926.<br />
FRITH, A. C., B.Sc.For., clo UNDP Office, Apartado 1424, Santo Domingo, Dominican<br />
Republic. 1947.<br />
FULLER, B. R., B.Sc.(Hons),(Lon.), "Grasmere," West Street, Selsey, Nr. Chichester,<br />
Sussex. 1953.<br />
FURNESS, C. K., B.Sc. Forest Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, P.O. Box 8111, Causeway,<br />
Salisbury, Rhodesia. 1957.<br />
FYFE, A. J., B.Sc., 11 Montpelier Terrace, Edinburgh 10. 1932.<br />
GAMBIA, H.E. The Governor, Government House, Bathurst, Gambia. 1923.<br />
GANE, Dr. M., B.Sc.Econ., M.A., D.Phil., Director, Development Planning Institute,<br />
University of Bradford, Bradford 7, Yorks. 1950.<br />
GARDNER, T. A. M., M.A.(Oxon), Conservator of Forests, P.O. Box 30513, Nairobi,<br />
Kenya. 1957.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 303<br />
HOLMES, J., Chief Training Officer, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Co-operatives,<br />
P.O. Box 2066, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 1954.<br />
HOLTAM, B. W., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), 15 Blacket Avenue, Edinburgh 9. 1949.<br />
HONORE, E. J., B.A.(Oxon), P.O. Box 24718, Karen, Nairobi, Kenya. 1955.<br />
HOPPER, R. L., For.Cert., clo District Forest Office, P.O. Box 3012, Arusha, Tanzania.<br />
1954.<br />
HOPWOOD, L. A., M.Inst., W.Sc., Status, 34 Sackville Street, Piccadilly, London,<br />
WIX 1DB. 1970.<br />
HORNE, J.E.M., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., A.lInf.Sc., Rivendale, Brook Road, Windermere.<br />
1955.<br />
HORSLEY SMITH AND SHERRY LIMITED, Ripple Wharf, River Road, Barking,<br />
Essex. 1964.<br />
HOSIE, Professor R. C., 7 Annesley Avenue, Toronto 17, Ontario, Canada. 1946.<br />
HOWARD, Dr. J. A. C., Ph.D., M.F., B.Sc.(Wales), F.R.E.S., F.L.'S., School of <strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria. Australia. 1947.<br />
HOWARD, W. J., B.Sc.For., Senior Scientific Officer, Land Resources Division, Overseas<br />
Development Administration, 41 Amerland Road, London, S.W.18. 1967.<br />
HOWARD, MESSRS. W. W. BRaS AND COMPANY LIMITED, Howard House,<br />
Lanrick Road, Poplar, London, E.14. 1964.<br />
HOWCROFT, N. H. S., Technical Assistant, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Bulolo, Territory of<br />
Papua and New Guinea. 1966.<br />
HOWELL, B. N., M.A.(Cantab), Spitchwick Manor, Poundsgate, Newton Abbot, Devon.<br />
1971.<br />
HOWELL, J. H., B.Sc.(Hons)For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer F.A.O., clo V.N.D.P., Apartado<br />
Postal 6314, Panama 5, Republic de Panama. 1963.<br />
HOWLAND, P., Dip.For.(Oxon), Research Officer, Forest Research Institute, Federal<br />
Department of Forest Research, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1957.<br />
HOWROYD, C. S., M.A., Forest Department, Sandakan, Sabah. 1950.<br />
HVA SENG SAWMILL COMPANY, Sibu, Sarawak. 1953.<br />
HUBBARD, C. S., O.B.E., B.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, P.O. Malkerns, SwaziIand. 1935.<br />
HUGHES, J. F., B.Sc., B.A., Dip.Ed., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1949.<br />
HUMMEL, Dr. F. C., M.A., D.Phil., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, 25 Savile Row, London,<br />
W.1. 1938.<br />
HUNT, L. G., clo Junior Carlton Club, Pall Mall, London, S.W.l. 1951.<br />
HUSSEY, T. W., B.A.(Oxon), Box Tree Cottage, Launcherley, Nr. Wells, Somerset. 1947.<br />
HYNDMAN-STEIN, A., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., clo Lloyds Bank Ltd., Cox's and King's<br />
Branch, P.O. Box 220, 6 Pall Mall, London, S.W.l. 1924.<br />
HYNE, J. R. L., Managing Director, Hyne and Son Pty. Ltd., P.O. Box 106, Maryborough,<br />
Queensland, Australia. 1951.<br />
HYDERABAD AND BERAR, H.E.H. The Nizam of Hyderabad and Berar, G.C.S.I.,<br />
King Kothi, Hyderabad, (Deccan), India. 1921.<br />
IMPERIAL TOBACCO GROUP LIMITED, Imperial House, 1 Grosvenor Square,<br />
London, WIX 6LJ. 1922.<br />
INCHBOLD-STEVENS, S. H., B.Sc.For. Zambia Forest College, Private Bag, Mwekera,<br />
Kitwe, Zambia. 1964.<br />
INDIA: FOREST UTILISATION DEPARTMENT, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. India.<br />
1964.<br />
INDIA: DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, CHANDIGARH, The Chief Conservator,<br />
Haryana, Chandigarh, India. 1967.<br />
INDIA, DEHRA DUN, The President, Forest Research Institue and Colleges, Dehra<br />
Dun, (U.P.) India. 1925.<br />
INDIA, Conservator of Forests, Hoshangabad Circle, Hoshangabad, M.P., India. 1965.<br />
INDIA: Chief Conservator of Forests, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. 1968.<br />
INDIA, Chief Conservator of Forests, Madras 6, India. 1969.<br />
INDIA, Conservator-General, Bengal Forest Department, Writers' Building, Calcutta,<br />
Bengal, India. 1945.<br />
INDIA: SOUTHERN FOREST RANGERS COLLEGE, Post Box No. 731, Coimbatore-2,<br />
India. 1931.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 305<br />
KEIGHLEY, G. D., B.Sc.(Edin.), <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Priestley Road, Basingstoke,<br />
Hants. 1944.<br />
KEMP, R. H., B.A.(Cantab.), B.A.(Oxon), Senior Research Officer, Comnl0n\vealth<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1970.<br />
KENNEDY, J. D., M.B.E., Dip.For(Oxon), Elmside, 10 Weststuart Road, Hawick. 1924.<br />
KENWORTHY, A., A.M.1.W.Sc., Fallowfield, 226 Holtye Road, East Grinstead. 1952.<br />
KERFOOT, 0., B.Sc.(Hons.), M.A.(Oxon), Department of Botany, University of the<br />
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 1962.<br />
KERMANI, W. A., B.Sc.(Hons)(Alig.), B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Chief Conservator of Forests,<br />
Sind Region, Thandi Sarak, Hyderabad, West Pakistan. 1947.<br />
KESSEL, S. L., M.Sc., Dip.For., Company Director, Australian Ne\vsprint Mills (Pty.)<br />
Ltd., 3 Monomeath Avenue, Toorak S.E.2, Victoria, Australia. 1922.<br />
KEW: The Director, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey. 1923.<br />
KHAN, F. M., B.Sc.Agr., B.Sc.For., M.S., Divisional Forest Officer, Aerial Forest<br />
Inventory Service, Peshawar, West Pakistan. 1966.<br />
KHANNA, I. D., Thapparnagar, P.O. Meerut City, D.P., India. 1925.<br />
KHAN, M. 1. R., M.Sc., M.F.(Hons.), A.I.F.C., Dip.For., Joint Secretary of Forests<br />
Punjab, Agriculture Department, 51 13 Lawrence Road, Lahore 3, W. Pakistan. 1946.<br />
KHAN, N., Forest Guard, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department Labasa, Fiji. 1971.<br />
KILEO, G. J., B Sc.(Hons.)(Lond.), B.Sc.(Hons.)For.(Wales), Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Forest<br />
Division, P.O. Box 426, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 1965.<br />
KIMATHI, T. M., P.O. Box 395, Nyeri, Kenya. 1970.<br />
KINLOCH, D., B.Sc.(Edin.), 125 Lady Nairn Avenue, Kirkcaldy, Fife. 1933.<br />
KINLOCH, J. B., B.Sc., Silviculturist, San Carios, Rio San Juan, Nicaragua, Central<br />
America. 1932.<br />
KIO, P. R. 0., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1963.<br />
KIPLING, T. H., B.A., 93 Edgar Road, Winchester, Hants. 1960.<br />
KIRBY, Major H. L., M.C., Dip.For.(Edin.), I.F.S.(retd.), clo National and Grindlays<br />
Bank Ltd., 13 S1. James's Square, London, S.W.1. 1929.<br />
KIRKUP, A., Chairman, Northern <strong>Forestry</strong> Products Ltd., Middleton Hall, Wooler,<br />
Northumberland. 1947.<br />
KITCHINGMAN, G. D., M.A.(Oxon), I.F.S.(retd.), Pelharn, Chideock, Nr. Bridport,<br />
Dorset. 1921.<br />
KIWANUKA, L. S. K., Forest Ranger, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />
Uganda. 1959.<br />
KNEBEL, A. M., B.Sc.For., Forestal Cottage, Westmarch Ash, Nr. Canterbury. 1948.<br />
KNUDSON, Dr. D. M., B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of<br />
Fore8try, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A. 1962.<br />
KONG THAI (1963) LIMITED, P.O. Box 297, Sibu, Sarawak. 1953.<br />
KORODRAV, K., Forester, Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1961.<br />
KRISHNA KUMARSINHJI, H.l-I. The Maharaja Krishna Kumarsinhji, K.C.S.I., The<br />
Palace, Bhavnagar, Bombay, India. 1922.<br />
LAHIRI, K. L., 6B Bright Street, Calcutta 19, Bengal, India. 1959.<br />
LAMB, A. F. A., O.B.E., B.Sc.For., Senior Research Officer, <strong>Commonwealth</strong> Forest<br />
Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford. 1930.<br />
'LAMB, K. M., B.Sc.For., 105 Waimairi Road, Christchurch 4, New Zealand. 1952.<br />
LAMB, M. C., Managing Director, Coast Timbers Ltd., 184 New Kings Road, Fulham,<br />
London., S.W.6. 1966.<br />
LAMBERT, H. G., Editor World Wood, 6306 S.W. 39th Avenue, Portland Oregon,<br />
97221, V.S.A. 1969.<br />
LANCASTER, P. C., O.B.E., M.A.(Oxon), 46 Grange Road, Bishops Stortford, Herts.<br />
1930.<br />
LANG-BROWN, J., B.A.(Bot.), B.A.(For.), M.A.(Oxon), Wheelwrights Cottage, Brewham<br />
Lodge, Bruton, Somerset. 1956.<br />
LANGLEY, R., B.Sc.For.(Wales), clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Paslow Building Belize<br />
City, British Honduras. 1960. '<br />
LATRAM, E. Bryan, C.B.E., !\1.M., Vice President C.F.A., Trebartha House, Nr.<br />
Launceston, Cornwall. 1944.<br />
LATHAM, C. G. A., M.A., A.C.A., Messrs. James Latham Ltd., Leeside Wharf, Clapton,<br />
London, E.5. 1965.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 307<br />
LOGAN, W. E. M., O.B.E., B.A.(Oxon), Little Piggots, North Dean, High Wycombe,<br />
Bucks. 1947.<br />
LOWE, Dr. R. G., M.A.(Cantab.), B.Sc.(Oxon), Ph.D., Principal Research Officer,<br />
Federal Department of Forest Research, P.M.B. 5054, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1957.<br />
LOWETH, A. N., B.Sc.For.(Wales), Deputy Conse,rvator of Forests, Forest Dept., Suva,<br />
Fiji. 1948.<br />
LUSHINGTON, J. R. F., Forest Department, P.O. Box 426, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.<br />
1956.<br />
LYSAGHT, J. F., B.Sc.For., Working Plans Officer, clo Box 15096, Wellington 4, New<br />
Zealand. 1945.<br />
LYSHOLM, G., Forest Research Officer, P.O. Box 95, Lushoto, Tanzania. 1970.<br />
MACALPINE, R. I., B.Sc., IFS(retd.), IT.A. Bungalow, Nagrakalta p.a., Dooars, West<br />
Bengal, India. 1939.<br />
McCANN, J. C., B.Sc.(Hons)For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Office, Urbenville, New South Wales, 2475,<br />
Australia. 1971.<br />
MACARTHUR, R., B.A.(Hons.)(Oxon), Spring Creek, Blenheim, New Zealand. 1947.<br />
McCARTHY, R. B., B.Sc.For., Dip.For., Manage'ment Officer, Department of Forests,<br />
P.O. Box 5055, Boroko, Papua and New Guinea. 1970.<br />
MACCOLL, Major H. H., M.C., IFS(retd.), 16 Steels Road, Hampstead, London, N.W.3.<br />
1925.<br />
MACDONALD, A. A., M.A.(Oxon), Walpole House, Stansted, Essex. 1954.<br />
McDONALD, H., B.Sc.For.(Syd.), D.F.(Canb.), clo Resident Representative, U.N.T.A.B.,<br />
Office, C.P.O. Box 143, Seoul, Korea. 1955.<br />
McDONALD, 1, Dip.For.(Cres.), <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, State Electricity Commission, 11<br />
Jeeralong Crescent, Yallourn, Victoria, Australia. 1954.<br />
MACDONALD, J. A. B., O.B.E., Dip.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Greystone Park, Moffat<br />
Road, Dumfries. 1950.<br />
McDONALD, P. G., Divisional Forest Office, P.O. Box 8, Thomson's Falls, Kenya. 1967.<br />
McELDERRY, J. C. K., B.A.For., M.A.(Oxon), Torbryan Mill, Poole Cross, Ipplepen.,<br />
Newton Abbot, Devon. 1937.<br />
MACGREGOR, W. D., C.B.E., B.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, Kiltane, Dunblane, Perthshire.<br />
1927.<br />
McINTOSH, D., B.Sc.(Edin.), "Heavers," Ryarsh, Maidstone, Kent. 1930.<br />
McINTOSH, D. H., B.Sc.For., Regional Forest Officer, Department of Forests, Konedobu,<br />
New Guinea. 1960.<br />
McINTYRE, H., Box 923, Durban, Natal, South Africa. 1925.<br />
MACKAY, J. S., Hon. Sec. West Otago Farm <strong>Forestry</strong> Association, "Montana," Heriot,<br />
West Otago, New Zealand. 1964.<br />
McKEE, R. G., B.S.F., 954 Terrace Avenue, Victoria, B.C., Canada. 1962.<br />
MacKELLAR, A. J., B.Sc., Box 84, Pietermaritzburg, Natal, South Africa. 1962.<br />
McKELVEY, Professor P. J., B.Sc.(N.Z.), B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Canterbury<br />
University, Christchurch, New Zealand. 1966.<br />
MACKENZIE, J. A., B.Sc., M.Sc., Department of Agricultural 'Biology, University of<br />
Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1962.<br />
McKERLIE, J. E., B.Sc.For.&Bot., Provincial Forest Office, p.a. Box 63, Mbeya,<br />
Southern Highlands Province, Tanzania. 1958.<br />
McKINNON, A. D., B.Sc.For., 58 Tamatea Road, Taupo, New Zealand. 1947.<br />
MacLENNAN, H. G., Box 22, R.R.1., Vankleek Hill, Ontario, Canada. 1966.<br />
McLINDEN, D. T., 93 Stanley Road, Folkestone, Kent. 1950.<br />
MacMILLAN, H. R., C.C., C.B.E., Graduate Forester, 1075 West Georgia Street, 26th<br />
Floor, Vancouver 5, D.C., Canada. 1945.<br />
MACMILLAN BLOEDEL LIMITED, <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada.- 1963.<br />
McNEILL, W. M., M.B.E., T.D., M.A., M.S., Dane Lodge, 4 Royfold Crescent,<br />
Aberde,en. 1924.<br />
McVEIGH, J., F.A.O., Forest Officer, clo Conservator of Forests, Porest Department,<br />
Suva, Fiji. 1961.<br />
MABONGA-MWISAKA, J. M., B.Sc.For., Forest Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />
Uganda. 1961.<br />
MAHAPATRA, B. C., Provincial Forest Office, p.a. Mubi, North East State, Nigeria.<br />
1970.
308 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
MAKONGO, D. }{., Assistant Forester, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism,<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Division, P.O. Box 671, Bukoba, Tanzania. 1971.<br />
MALAWI FOREST SCHOOL, Private Bag 6, Dedza, Malawi. 1963.<br />
MALLAM, J. C., Three Ways, Ublcy, Bristol, Somerset. 1930.<br />
MALLINSON, Colonel Sir C. Stuart, C.B.E., D.S.O., M.C., J.P., D.L., The White House,<br />
Woodford Green, Essex. 1922.<br />
MALLINSON, Messrs. William and Sons, 130 Hackney Road, London, E.2. 1922.<br />
MANGAN, P. G., 3000 South 80th Street, West Allis, Wisconsin, 53219, U.S.A. 1970.<br />
MANNING SEED C01\1PANY, 11206 Bridge Port Way, Tacoma, Washington, 98499,<br />
U.S.A. 1953.<br />
MARCANO, A. R., Apartado de Carreos No. 60, Barinas Edo, Barinas, Venezuela. 1962.<br />
MARCH, E. W., M.A., 87 Harnham Road, Salisbury, Wilts. 1932.<br />
MARSH, D. E. M., B.Sc.For., J.P., 21 High Street, Sharnbrook, Beds. 1950.<br />
MARSH, E. K., B.A.(Cape.), M.A.For.(Oxon), Chief Research Officer, Forest Research<br />
Institute, P.O. Box 727, Pretoria, South Africa. 1935.<br />
MARSHALL, H. G. W., clo Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of British Columbia,<br />
Vancouver 8, B.C., Canada. 1960.<br />
MARSHALL, W. E., U.N. }(orean Forest Survey and Development Project, P.O. Box<br />
36, Suwon, I(yonggi-Do., Korea. 1947.<br />
MARSHALL, W. G., 122 Winchmore Hill Road, Southgate, London, N.14. 1934.<br />
MARTEN, K. D., B.Sc.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Munda, British Solomon Islands,<br />
Protectorate. 1969.<br />
MASIREWA, J., Forester, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Lautoka, Fiji. 1971.<br />
MASON, C. G. W., M.Sc., F.N.Z.I.C., A.N.I.C., A.M.I.Chem.E., New Zealand Forest<br />
Service, P.O. Box 875, Wellington, New Zealand 1959.<br />
MASON, P. F., B.A.For.(Oxon), Dip.Anth.(Oxon), 11 Connaught House, Connaught<br />
Avenue, Frinton-on-Sea, Essex. 1939.<br />
MASSON, J., G.M., B.Sc.For., 3 Firth Crescent, Trumpethill, Gourock, Renfrewshire.<br />
1950.<br />
MATTHEWS, Professor J. D., B.Sc.For., F.S.For., F.R.S,E., Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>,<br />
University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen. 1950.<br />
MATTHEWS, P. K .. , B.Sc.Hons.(Bang.), M.Sc.(NB), 30 Well Street, Moffat, Dunfriesshire.<br />
1962.<br />
MATfJUR, R. B., Silviculturist, (Sal. Region), Uttar Pradewh, India. 1971.<br />
MAURITIUS FOREST DEPARTMENT, The Private Secretary, H.E. The Governor,<br />
Government House, Mauritius. 1923.<br />
MAXWELL-MACDONALD, J., B.A.For.(Oxon), Gortinanane, Tayinloan, Argyll. 1933.<br />
MAYHEAD, Dr. G. J., B.Sc., Ph.D., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission Research Station, Alice Holt<br />
Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey. 1964.<br />
MBURU, 0., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), C.C.F. Forest Department, P.O. Box 30513, Nairobi,<br />
Kenya. 1967.<br />
MEIKLEJDHN, W., C.I.E., B.Sc.(Edin.), F.R.C.S., IFS(retd.), Falaise, Avenue du Petit<br />
Mont, Mount Bingham, Jersey, Channel Islands. 1930.<br />
MERVART, Dr. J. A., B.Sc., Ph.D., F.A.D. <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, Federal Department of<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong>, P.M.B. 5011, Ibadan, Nigeria. 1971.<br />
MICHAEL, D., Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1960.<br />
MIDHOLI, D., B.Sc., Forest Department, P.D. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda. 1951.<br />
MILLER, Dr. H. G., B.Sc.(Hons.)For., Ph.D., Senior Scientific Officer, Pest and Forest'<br />
Soils Section, Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Carigiebuckler, Aberdeen<br />
AB9 2QJ. 1964.<br />
MILLER, R. G., B.Sc., Forest Research Institute, Canberra, A.C.T. 2600, Australia. 1931.<br />
MILLER, W. A., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Chief Forester and General Manager, Messrs. Bryant<br />
& May (<strong>Forestry</strong>) Ltd., 23 Biddenham Turn, Bedford. 1937.<br />
MILNER, K., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), British Columbia Forest Service, Prince Rupert, B.C.,<br />
Canada. 1955.<br />
MINCHIN, A. A. F., Dip.For.(Oxon), Cruxfield House, Near Duns, Berwick. 1971.<br />
MISHRA, B., B.Sc.Hons., Dip.For., Provincial Forest Officer, Adamawa Province, Vola,<br />
North East State, Nigeria. 1970.<br />
MITCHELL, A. J. L., B.Sc.For., 12 St. Edmunds Gate, Attleborough, Norfolk. 1953.<br />
MITCHELL, . B. A., B.Sc.For.&Bot.(Wales), Southern Regional Station, Forest Research<br />
InstItute, Mount Gambier, P.O. Box 946, South Australia. 1950.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 309<br />
MITCHELL, W. B. G., B.Sc..For., Dinmont, Tullibardine Crescent, Auchterarder,<br />
Perthshire. 1927.<br />
MOBBS, Professor E. C., C.B.E., M.A., B.Sc., F.S.F., IFS(retd.), 3 Kennedy Road,<br />
Napier, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. 1930.<br />
MOHD. DARUS BIN MAHMUD, Forest De'partment, Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia.<br />
1962.<br />
MOHAMAD NOR BIN Y AACOB, B.Sc.For.(Syd.), State Forest Officer, Pahang, West<br />
Malaysia. 1958.<br />
MORD. YAKIN BIN LONG, Forest Department Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1948.<br />
MOIZ, YOOSUF AND COMPANY (S'PORE) LIMITED, 4 Ampang Street, 1st Floor,<br />
Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1965.<br />
MOODY, B. H., Forest Department, P.O. Box 181, Belize, British Honduras. 1962.<br />
MOONEY, J. W. C., M.A.(Oxon), English Forest Association Limited, Woodcote Road,<br />
Caversham, Reading. 1949.<br />
MOORE, D., B.Sc.(Edin.), F.A.O. Forest Adviser, Apartado de Correos 824F, Caracas,<br />
Venezuela. 1954.<br />
·MORGAN, R. G., P.O. Box 8 Putururu, New Zealand. 1948.<br />
MORRISON, Dr. I. K., B.Sc.For., M.Sc.For., Ph.D., Research Scientist, 4 Huntington<br />
Part, Apt. 11, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada. 1971.<br />
MORRISON, K. R., Assoc.Dip.For.(Cres.), District Forester, Forest Commission,<br />
Marysville, Victoria, Australia. 1960.<br />
MORS, L. S., B.Sc.(Syd.), D.F.(Canb.), Queen Street, Oberon, New South Wales,<br />
Australia. 1955.<br />
MOSS, A., B.Sc., B.e.R.F., Woodlands Manager, Messrs. S. W. Simpson Ltd., 2500<br />
Abbott Street, Kelowna, B.C., Canada. 1947.<br />
MOSTYN, H. P., B.Sc.For.(Bang.), Romalee, 9 Park Chase, Guildford, Surrey. 1951.<br />
MUIR, W. D., M.A., Dip.For., 7 Minnamurra Road, Northbridge 2063, New South<br />
Wales, Australia. 1929.<br />
MUKAH SAWMILL (1962) LIMITED, 21 Wing Nai Siong Road, P.O. Box 451, Sibu,<br />
Sarawak. 1966.<br />
MULLIN, L. J., Dip.For., John Meikle Forest Research Station, P. Bag 76G,<br />
Penhalonga, Rhodesia. 1957.<br />
MUNDY, T., Messrs. T. Mundy (Timbers) Limited, (Hardwoods), 70 Queen Victoria<br />
Street, London, E.C.4. 1949.<br />
MUNRO, BRICE AND COMPANY LIMITED, Royal Liver Building, Liverpool 3.<br />
1965.<br />
MURRAY, C. H., M.A.(Oxon), F.A.O. Forest Division, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome,<br />
Italy. 1961.<br />
MURRAY, G. St. C., F.R.S.A., 11 Manor Place, Edinburgh 3. 1948.<br />
MURTLAND, R., B.Sc.For., M.Sc., 9 Colville' Place, Aberdeen. 1967.<br />
MUSTAFFA BIN MUDA, Forest Department, Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia. 1965.<br />
MUTAZZIBWAWO, Y., Forest Ranger, Forest Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />
Uganda. 1950.<br />
MUTHOO, Dr. M. K., B.Sc.(J.&K.), Ph.D., Planning Department, 166 Karan Nagar,<br />
Srinagar, Kashmir, India. 1959.<br />
MYSORE, Major-General Sir S. J. Wadiyar Bahadur, G.C.B., G.C.S.I, LL.D., His Highness<br />
The Maharaja Rajapramukh of Mysore, The Palace, Mysore City, South India.<br />
1951.<br />
NALUSWA, J. T., M.Sc., Dip.lng.For., Forest Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />
Uganda. 1970.<br />
NAMASIVAYAM, M., M.A.(Oxon), Forest Specialist, Asian Development Bank, Commercial<br />
Center, P.O. Box 126, Makati, Rizal D-708, Philippines. 1947.<br />
NASH, C. A. M., M.B.E., B.Sc.For.(Aber), P.O. Box 10, Honiara, British Solomon<br />
Islands. 1953.<br />
NDEGWA, D. T., Divisional Forest Office', P.O. Box 99, Kitale, Kenya. 1971.<br />
NDOLERIRE, F. K., Forest Ranger, Forest Department, p.a. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />
Uganda. 1956.<br />
NEILSON, J. R., M.A.(Oxon), 62 Grappenhall Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington. 1946.<br />
NEPAL FOREST RESOURCES SURVEY OFFICE, Survey Chief, 21/31, Ram Shah<br />
Path, Kathmandu, Nepal. 1968.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 313<br />
REDMOND, Dr. D. R., D.F.C., B.Sc.F., M.F., Ph.D., Scientific Adviser, Department of<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> and Rural Development, 161 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa 4, Ontario,<br />
Canada. 1962.<br />
REECE, P. 0., A.M.I.C.E., M.I.Struct.E., A.M.I.Mun.E., F.I.W.Sc., Powell Duffryn<br />
Timber Holdings Ltd., Powell DufIryn House, 19 'Berkeley Street, London, W.l. 1951.<br />
REES, T. I., B.Se.Agri. & For.(Wales), Project Manager, U.N.D.P./F.A.O./Special Fund,<br />
Forest Development and Watershed Management Project, 2 South Odeon Avenue,<br />
Kingston 10, Jamaica, West Indies. 1947.<br />
REEVE, R. W., Clifton Cottage, Stoke Ferry, Norfolk. 1951.<br />
REGAN, E. L., Dip.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission of New South Wales, Assembly Hall,<br />
Margaret Street, P.O. Box 2667, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 1950.<br />
REICHEL, R. J., B.Sc.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Forest Office" Bellangry, New South<br />
Wales 2446, Australia. 1970. .<br />
REID, P. R., B.Se.For., S.A.C.F., Forest Management Officer, H.Q., Ministry of Natural<br />
Resources, <strong>Forestry</strong> Division,'Maiduguri, N.E. State, Nigeria. 1970.<br />
RENDLE, B. J., B.Se., A.R.C.S., F.L.S., F.I.W.Sc., Glebe Cottage, Horsenden, Aylesbury,<br />
Bucks. 1928.<br />
RHODESIA NATIVE TIMBER CONCESSIONS LIMITED, Box 567, Bulawayo,<br />
Rhodesia. 1940.<br />
RICHARDS, Dr. B. N., B.Sc.For., Ph.D., Dip.For., Senior Lecturer in Botany, University<br />
of New England, 21 College Avenue, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.<br />
1965.<br />
RICHARDSON, J., B.Se.(Hons.)For., Canadian Forest Service, P.O. Box 6028, St. John's<br />
Newfoundland, Canada. 1968.<br />
RICIIARDSON, Professor S. D., M.A., B.Sc., D.Phil.(Oxon), <strong>Forestry</strong> Department,<br />
University College of North Wales, Bangor, Caerns. 1960.<br />
RICHMOND, P. C., For. Cert., Dip.For., clo Forests Department, Box 366, Kalgoorlie,<br />
Western Australia 6430. 1951.<br />
RIDDOCH, J., C.B.E., Box 40, Kisumu, Kenya, 1949.<br />
RIVARD, F., B.A., F.E. & Q.L.S.Hons.(Que), Chief Forest Engineer, Canadian International<br />
Paper Company, 1540 Sun Life Building, Montreal 2 P.Q., Canada. 1956.<br />
ROBERTS, R. W., B.Se.For., 6423 Brooke Street, Vancouver 16, British Columbia,<br />
Canada. 1971.<br />
ROBERTSON, I. J. M., B.Se.(Edin), M.Sc., 54 Highburgh Drive, Burnside, Rutherglen,<br />
Glasgow. 1961.<br />
ROBSON, M., B.Se., 14a Greenhill Terrace, Edinburgh 10. 1931.<br />
ROCHE, Dr. L., B.Agr.For., M.A., M.F., Ph.D., Laurentian Forest Research Centre,<br />
Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.O. Box 3800, Ste Foy, P.Q., Canada. 1967.<br />
RODGER, G. l., B.Se.For., 38 Lynington Street, Tusmore, South Australia 5065. 1929.<br />
RODRIGUEZ, Eng.For.R., Carmen a Puente Arauca, Residencia "El Carmen," Apt. 42,<br />
Caracas, Venezuela. 1970.<br />
ROGERS, M. T., B.Se.(Hons)For., The Marches, Chelveston-eum-Caldecott, Wellingborough,<br />
Northants. 1962.<br />
ROSS, J. K., B.Sc.For.(Edin), <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, CoIn Cottage, Bibury, Cirencester,<br />
Glos. 1946.<br />
ROWAN, G. W., Port Durnford Plantation, P.O. Fleixton, Natal, South Africa. 1937.<br />
ROWE, R. D. H., B.Sc.For.(Wales), F.A.O./World Bank Co-operative Programme, Via<br />
delle Terme di Caraealla, Rome, Italy. 1970.<br />
ROWLAND, L., O.B.E., Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> Grosvenor Estates, Hoseley House, Gresford,<br />
Nr. Wrexham, Denbighshire'. 1951.<br />
ROXBURGH, A. L., D.Se., 32 D'arres Road, Ponteland, Neweastle-upon-Tyne. 1953.<br />
ROYAL COMMONWEALTH SOCIETY, 18 Northumberland Avenue, London, W.C.2.<br />
1923.<br />
ROYAL FORESTRY SOCIETY OF ENGLAND, WALES AND, NORTHER,N IRE<br />
LAND, 102 'High Street, 'rring, 'Herts. 1922.<br />
RUKUBA, M.L.S.B., B.Sc.For., Forest Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda.<br />
1953.<br />
RYAN, P., B.Se.For., Department of Forests, Konedobu, Papu. 1967.<br />
RYLE, G. B., C.B.E., Dip.For.(Oxon), F.S.For., The White Cottage, Bank, Lyndhurst,<br />
Hants, S04 7FD. 1930.<br />
3
314 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
SABAH FORESTRY DEPARTMENT, P.O. Box 311, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia.<br />
1953.<br />
SABAH TIMBER COMPANY LIMITED, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. 1953.<br />
SACHTLER, Dr. M., Naciones Unidas, Apartado 1424, Santo Domingo, Republic of<br />
Dominica. 1969.<br />
ST. LUCIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOREST SERVICES,<br />
Castries, St. Lucia, Windward Islands, West Indies. 1952.<br />
SAFO, E. K., Forester, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Training School, P.O. Box 31, Sunyani, Ghana.<br />
1958.<br />
SALE, G. N., B.Sc.For.(Edin), "Avrion," Heathlands Road, Wokingham, Berks. 1924.<br />
SALTER, B. R., B.A.(Oxon), Underbridge Cottage, Higher Walton, Via Warrington,<br />
Lancs. 1962.<br />
SAMLER, W. H. G., M.A., Dip.For.(Oxon), 39 Bloomfield Park, Bath, BA2 2BX,<br />
Somerset. 1926.<br />
SANDERS, M., B.Sc.For.(Edin), B.Sc.Est.Man., 38 Kenmere Avenue, P.O. Box 491,<br />
Ndola, Zambia. 1947.<br />
SANGSTER, R. G., C.B.E., B.Sc.For., Scottish Woodlands Owners Association, 26 Mur..<br />
rayfield Drive, Edinburgh, EH12 6EB. 1935.<br />
SARAWAK FOREST DEPARTMENT, Kuching, Sarawak. 1958.<br />
SARAWAK UNITED SAWMILLS LIMITED, P.O. Box 143, 13 Island Road, Sibu,<br />
Sarawak, Malaysia. 1957.<br />
SARGENT, K., O.B.E., B.Sc., Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Development and<br />
Planning, P.O. Box 174, Zomba, Malawi. 1944.<br />
SARKI, Y. B., B.Sc.For., Ministry of Natural Resources, P.M.B. 2103, Kaduna, Nigeria.<br />
1956.<br />
SAVILL, P. S., B.Sc., District Forest Officer, Whiterock, Killinchy, Co. Down, Northern<br />
Ireland. 1965.<br />
SAVERS, Major R. J., Dip.For.(Cantab), I.F.S.(retd.), <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, Bryanston<br />
Cottage, Blandford, Dorset. 1929.<br />
SCHULTZ, C. D., B.A., B.Sc., M.E.I.C., M.C.I.F., B.C.R.F., 325 Howe Street, Van..<br />
couver 1, British Columbia, Canada. 1943.<br />
SCOTTISH WOODLAND OWNERS' ASSOCIATION LIMITED, 6 Chester Street,<br />
Edinburgh 3. 1954.<br />
SCOTT, J. S., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), Dip.Ed., Principal, Thornton School, Cross House, KiI..<br />
marnock, Ayrshire. 1957.<br />
SCOlT McBRIDE, J., B.Sc.F., B.A.Sc., P.Eng., Scarsdale, Penn Road, Beaconsfield,<br />
Bucks. 1969.<br />
SCOTTISH PULP AND PAPER MILLS, Royal Bank Buildings, Fort William, Inverness-shire.<br />
1958.<br />
SEARLE, Mrs. C. M. M., Fairfield, 115 Banbury Road, Oxford. 1964.<br />
SEELY, H. E., B.Sc.F.(N.B.), 214 Latchford Road, Ottawa 3, Ontario, Canada. 1935.<br />
SEIN GYI, Yedwin-Yegan, Myaungmya, Burma. 1929.<br />
SELBY, R., B.Se., 21a John Street, Luton, Beds. 1970.<br />
SETROPA (BUITENWEG AND COMPANY), P.O. Box 203, BUSSUffi, Holland. 1971.<br />
SEVASTOS, C., Senior <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer-Economist, 4 Fokides Street, Athens, Greece.<br />
1964.<br />
SHAKESPEARE, E., M.I.L., For.Cert.(U.K.), Alvord Institute, P.Bag 9181, Fort Victoria,<br />
Rhodesia. 1957.<br />
SHEDLEY, P. N., B.Sc.For., clo Lauri Timber Company Limited, Nannup, Western<br />
Australia. 1957.<br />
SHEPHERD, Dr. K. R., B.Sc.F.(Syd.), Dip.For.(Canb.), Ph.D., Australian National<br />
University, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia, 1954.<br />
SHERWIN, I. M., M.A., Seaforest Industries Limited, 605 Courtney Street, Victoria,<br />
British Columbia, Canada. 1953.<br />
SHIRIMA, D. U., Assistant Forester, P.O. Box 26, Tabora, Tanzania. 1970.<br />
SHRUBSHALL, E. J., B.Se.Hons., Knowle House, Knowle St. Giles, Nr. Chard,<br />
Somerset. 1927.<br />
SIM, D., B.Sc.For.(Aber.), Dip.Ed., Uganda Forest School, Nyabyeya, P.O. Masindi,<br />
Uganda. 1950.<br />
SIMPFENDORFER, K. 1., M.Sc.For., DipI.For.(Vic.), Forests Commission, 453 Latrobe<br />
Street, Melbourne C., Victoria, Australia. 1958.
SECTION 1. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 317<br />
TAUPO TOTARA TIMBER COMPANY LIMITED, P.O. Box 190, Putaruru, New<br />
Zealand. 1969.<br />
TAYLOR, S. A., Forest Office, P.M.B. 5053, lbadan, Nigeria. 1962.<br />
TAYLOR, C., 19 Murdieston Street, Greenock, Renfrewshire. 1970.<br />
TAYLOR, Dr. C. J., M.B.E., E.D., B.Se., Ph.D., F.R.S.E., Director of Studies, Edinburgh<br />
University, Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, 10 Cluny Gardens, Edinburgh 10. 1937.<br />
TEMESI, T., Forest Guard, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Suva, Fiji. 1970.<br />
TEM,PLE-PERKINS, E. A., F.O., clo Fisheries Department Bag, P.O. Lake Katwe,<br />
Toro, Uganda. 1954.<br />
T'ESHA, P. V., B.Sc.H'ons.For.(Wales), clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Division, P.O. Box 426, Dar es<br />
Salaam, Tanzania!. 1965.<br />
THESEN (RHODEiSIAS) PTY. LIMITED, P.O. Box 108, Umtali, ,Rhodesia. 1954.<br />
THIRGOOD, Dr. J. V., B.Se.For.Bot., M.F., Ph.D., M.Sc.F., Associate Professor,<br />
Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, British Columbia,<br />
Canada. 1949.<br />
THOM, J. R., B.'Sc.For.(Edin), Project Manager, UNDP., P.O. Box 32, 71000 Serajevo,<br />
Yugoslavia. 1949.<br />
THOMAS, A. V., M.B.E., B.Sc., M.Eng., "Vivemos," Off Kappara Lane, Ms:erah,<br />
Malta, G.C. 1937.<br />
THOMAS, 1., B.'Sc., Dip.For., Woods and Forests Department, Government Offices,<br />
Rundle Street, Adelaide, South Australia. 1946.<br />
THOM'PSON, B.R., Dip.For., Erin Forest, P.O., Juliasdale, Rhodesia. 1963.<br />
THOMSON, A. P., B.Sc.F'or.(N.Z.), Director-General Forests, New Zealand Forest<br />
Service, Private Bag, Wellington, New Zealend. 1936.<br />
THOMSON, M. G., M.Sc., B.S.A., B.C.R.F., 2226 West 35th Street, Vancouver 13, British<br />
Columbia, Canada. 1946.<br />
TILBROOK, E. M., M.A.(Oxon), B.Sc.(S.A.), clo Forest Department, P.O. Box 805,<br />
Ndola, Zambia. 1955.<br />
TILNEY-BASSETf, H. A. E., B.Sc.For.(Edin), District Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> C'ommission,<br />
286 High Street, Lincoln. 1949.<br />
TIMBER RESEAR'CH AND DEVE,LOlp'MENT A,SSOCIATI'O'N LIMITED, Hughenden<br />
Valley, High Wycombe, Bucks. 1945.<br />
TIMMIS, R., 'B.Sc.For., clo Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong>, University of British Columbia, Vancouver<br />
8, B.C., Canada. 1963.<br />
TIMSALES, P.O. Box 18080, Nairobi, Kenya. 1952.<br />
TIWAR\I, K. P., B.Sc., A.I.E.C., Assistant Conservator of Forests, Hoshangabad Forest<br />
Division, Hoshangabad, M.P., India. 1965.<br />
TOLEMAN, R. D. L., B.Sc.(Hons)For., Assistant Site Survey Officer, <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission,<br />
Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian. 1962.<br />
TOOL,SIE PERSAUD, The Director, 1-4 Lombard Street, Georgetown, Guyana. 1966.<br />
TORRES, R. Lombo, Ingeniero Forestal, Apartado Aereo No.13350, Bogota D.E.,<br />
C'olombia, South America. 1963.<br />
TOWNSEND, K. N. V., D.F.M., B.Sc.(Edin), E.D., District Forest Officer, Glengarry,<br />
Beechcroft Terrace, Insch, Aberdeenshire. 1947.<br />
TRANSVAA'L AND OR\ANG'E FREE STATE CHAMBER OF M'INES, Biological &<br />
Chemical Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 809, Johannesburg, South Africa. 1927.<br />
TRAVERS, W. W. G., B.A.(Oxon), B.Sc., clo Weyerhauser (Aust.) Pty. Ltd., P.O. Box<br />
75, Homebush, New South Wales 2.40, Australia. 1959.<br />
TRENAMAN, K. W., M.A.(Oxon), Chief <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, Forest Department, Honiara,<br />
British Solomon Islands. 1950.<br />
TREVELYAlN, J. F., B.Se.For., R.D.3., Te Puke, New Zealand. 1960.<br />
TRINfDAD AND TOBAGO FOREST DEPARTMENT, The Conservator of Forests,<br />
Port of Spain, Trinidad. 1934.<br />
TRINI'DAD, University College of the West Indies, Faculty of Agriculture, S1. Augustine,<br />
Trinidad, West Indies. 1923.<br />
TUCKWELL, E. C., B.Sc.For., Dip.For.fCanb), Senior Forest Officer, Department of<br />
Forests, Rabaul, T.P.N.G. 1960.<br />
TURNER, A. R., B.Sc.For.(Tor), 720 Evelyn Drive, West Vancouver, British Columbia,<br />
Canada. 1949.<br />
TURNER, B., B.-Se.For., Dip.For., M.F., D.For., 109 Ferguson Building, University<br />
Park, Pat 16802, U.S.A. 1960.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 319<br />
WARREN, Professor H. V., B.A., 'B.Sc., Ph.D., F.R.S.(Can.), 1816 Western Parkway,<br />
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 1950.<br />
WATKINS, G., B.Sc.For.(Wales), Forest Department, Suva, Fiji. 1946.<br />
WATSON, J. W., M.A., B.Sc.(Lon.), Baunton Corner, Cirencester, Glos. 1959.<br />
WATT, A., C.B.E., B.A.(Oxon), Greenways, 4 Ravelston Dykes Lane, Edinburgh, EH4<br />
3NY. 1947.<br />
WATT, A. W. M., C.B.E., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), Forest Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe,<br />
Uganda. 1946.<br />
WATT, W. E., A.F.C., B.A., Dip.For., <strong>Forestry</strong> Consultant, 11 Lawley Street, Waterkloof,<br />
Brooklyn, Pretoria, South Africa. 1922.<br />
WAWIYE, J. J. Y., <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, P.O. Box 30513, Nairobi, Kenya. 1970.<br />
WEBB, A. W., B.Sc.For.(Melb.), 5 Genville Street, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia. 1960.<br />
WEBB, H. R., M.B.E., Budongo, 119 King's Acre Road, Hereford. 1930.<br />
WEBB, W. E., B.S.F.(B.C.), M.S.(N.Y.), R.P.F.(B.C.), Project Manager, Sabah Forest<br />
Inventory, clo Forest Department, P.O. Box 311, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. 1953.<br />
WEBSTER, G., O.B.E., Private <strong>Forestry</strong> Agent, Court House, Beckford, Nr. Tewkesbury,<br />
Glos. 1938.<br />
WEDDERBURN, L. C. M., B.Sc.For.(Edin.), 129 Grieve Street, Dunfermline, Fife.<br />
1960.<br />
WEDDERBURN, R. J., B.A.(Oxon), Chief Conservator of Forests, Ministry of Natural<br />
Resources, North Eastern State, P.M.B. 47 Maiduguri, Nigeria. 1957.<br />
WELLWOOD, Professor R. W., B.Sc., M.F., Ph.D., 4305 West 14th Avenue, Vancouver<br />
8, British Columbia, Canada. 1940.<br />
WELSH, G. H., For.Cer1., Chikangawa, P/Bag, Mzimba, Malawi. 1951.<br />
WESTBROOK, H., 218 Farrand Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. 1971.<br />
WESTERN SAMOA, The <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer, Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 206,<br />
Apia, Western Samoa. 1967. .<br />
WESTMACOTf, R. E., 207 Avenue Gardens, The Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, Western<br />
Australia 6009. 1966.<br />
WESTOBY, J. C., Deputy Director Programme Co-ordination and Operations, F.A.O.<br />
Headquarters, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy. 1967.<br />
WESTON, G. C., M.A.(Oxon), B.Sc.(N.Z.), Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New<br />
Zealand. 1949.<br />
WHITAKER, J. D., B.A.For.(Oxon), The Causeway, Beacon Close, Crowborough,<br />
Sussex. 1959.<br />
WHITE, K. J., B.Se.For., Dip.For., Chief Conservator of Forests, Department of<br />
Forests, Konedobu, Papua. 1960.<br />
WHITEHEAD, J. E., Silverdale, New Walk, North Ferriby, Yorks. 1956.<br />
WHITESIDE, H., Mill Manager, Mount Gambier State Mill, Woods and Forests<br />
Department, Mount Gambier, South Australia. 1953.<br />
WHITING, G., Director, Stowmarket Timber Co., All Saints Hall, Creeting S1. Mary.<br />
1951. .<br />
WHOLLEY, J. W., B.Sc.For.(Wales), clo Agriculture and Fishery Department, 393<br />
Canton Road, 12th Floor, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 1953.<br />
WHYTE, I., B.Sc.For.(A.N.U.), clo Department of Forests, Keravat, T.P.N.G. 1969.<br />
WICHT, Dr. C. L., B.Sc.(Stell), B.A.(Oxon), Dr.ln.g.(Dresden), F.R.S.(S.A.), Professor of<br />
Silviculture, <strong>Forestry</strong> Faculty, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.<br />
1932.<br />
WIDDUP, Captain W., M.C., M.M., Company Director, P.O. Box 282, Highlands, Salisbury,<br />
Rhodesia. 1956.<br />
WIGG, L. C. C. T., M.A.(Oxon), B.A.Hons.Bot. Dip.For.(Oxon), 5 Harbord Road,<br />
Oxford. 1925.<br />
WILLAN, R. G. M., C.B.E., B.Sc., Old Hill, Lurgashall, Petworth, Sussex. 1930.<br />
WILLAN, R. L., B.A.(Oxon), Via Del Caucaso 49/7, E.U.R. 00144, Rome, Italy. 1950.<br />
WILLIAMS, G. H. D., B.Se., Forest Department, P.O. Box 228, Ndola, Zambia. 1946.<br />
WILLIAMS, M. R. W., M.A.(Oxon), Calyton Road, Mold, Flintshire. 1948.<br />
WILLIAMSON, J. Q., M.B.E., B.Sc., <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, Victoria House, Victoria<br />
Terrace, Aberystwyth, Cards. 1949.<br />
WIIJLIAMSON, P., I.P., P.O. Box 13, Whanamata, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. 1933.<br />
WILSON, Professor J. 0., Restitutcia Polski, M.A.(Oxon), F.E.Que. L.M., 61 Queen<br />
Mary Road, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 1947.
SECTION I. COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOCIATION 321<br />
SUPPLEMENTARY LIST OF MEMBERS·<br />
BALL, J. B., B.Sc.(Edin.), Dip.For.(Oxon), "The Sheilings," Haughton Lane, Shifnal,<br />
Shropshire.<br />
BUDONGO SAWMILLS, clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda.<br />
lIESMER, Professor H., Dr.For., 53 Bonn 1 (West Germany), Beethovenstr. 30,<br />
F orestinstitute.<br />
HUDSON, J. M., B.Sc.For., 10 Kings\vay, Northwich, Cheshire.<br />
MUTESASIRA, C., clo Forest Department, P.O. Box 31 Entebbe, Uganda.<br />
QUAYNOR, S. O-A., B.Sc., B.S.F., M.Sc., Research Officer, Silviculture, Forest Products<br />
Research Institute, University, P.O. Box 63, Kumasi, Ghana.<br />
ROBBINS, A. M. J., B.Sc.Hons.For.(Aber.), Cert.For.(Oxon), Sandleheath, 44 Langley<br />
Road, Slough, Bucks.<br />
CIIANGES OF ADDRESS·<br />
CHOATE, T. A. R., clo Standard Bank Ltd., 28 Northumberland Avenue, London,<br />
W.C.2.<br />
DANBURY, D. J., B.Sc.For., M.Sc.F., Deputy Head, <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, College of<br />
Agriculture and <strong>Forestry</strong>, Newton Rigg, Penrith, Cumberland.<br />
De ROSAYRO, R. A., B.A., B.Sc.(Oxon), B.A.(Lond.), Project Manager, U.N.D.P.I<br />
P.A.O., <strong>Forestry</strong> Development & Watershed Management, 2 South Odeon Avenue,<br />
Kingston 10, Jamaica, West Indies.<br />
DEVITT, J. G., D.S.C., B.Sc.For., Project Manager, F.A.O., P.O. Box 107, Kathmandu,<br />
Nepal.<br />
FEARNSIDE, A., B.Sc.(Wales), R.M.B. 113, Via Woden, A.C.T. 2611, Australia.<br />
HIDE, R., The Cottage, Thurlestobe, Nr. Kingsbridge, South Devon.<br />
JONES, G. A., B.Sc., c/o 2071 Garrick Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.<br />
McKERLIE, J. E., "Windfall," Barncroft, Appleshaw, Andover, Hants.<br />
PEREIRA, J. A., clo Mrs. C. C. Pereira, Office of the President, P.O. Box 30510,<br />
Nairobi, Kenya.<br />
PRIDHAM, F. H., clo <strong>Forestry</strong> Department, Dwellingup, Western Australia.<br />
RICHARDS, Dr. B. N., B.Sc.For., Ph.D., Dip.For., University of New England.<br />
Department of Botany, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.<br />
VYNER, Commander C., 41A Hays Mews, London, W.l.<br />
* Received too late for inclusion in main list.
SECTION 11<br />
COMMONWEALTH FOREST SERVICES AND FOREST<br />
RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS<br />
AUSTRALIA<br />
FORESTRY AND TIMBER BUREAU<br />
(Department of National Development)<br />
CANB'ERRA, A.'C.T.<br />
Director-General: D. A. N. Cromer, D.Sc.F,or., M.Se., Dipt.For.<br />
Technical Secretary (and acting Secretary, Australian <strong>Forestry</strong> Council): L. F.<br />
Hammond, B.Sc(For.), Dip.For.<br />
FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE:<br />
Director: A. G. M'cArthur, B.Se(For.), Dip.For. (acting).<br />
Officer-In-Charge, Silvicultural Research: A. G. Br,own, B.Sc.(For.), M.Se.,<br />
Dip.For.<br />
Officer-In-Charge, Forest Protectio:n Research: (Vacant).<br />
Officer-in-Charge, Forest Management Research.' M. L. Benson, B.Sc(For.),<br />
Dip.F·or.<br />
Officer-in-Charge, Regional Research Stations.' R. D. Johnston, D.F.C., B.Se.<br />
(Hons.), Ph.D., D.I.C.<br />
TIMBER SUPPLY ECONOMICS BRANCH:<br />
Officer-in-Charge.· C. S. Cree, D.B.E., B.A.(For.).<br />
COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH<br />
ORGANISATION<br />
DIVISION OF FOREST PRODUcrs<br />
P.O. Box 56, Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia<br />
Chief of Division.' R. W. R. Muncy, M.E.E., D.Ap'p.Sc.<br />
Assistant Chief.' F. A. Blakey, B.E., Ph.D.<br />
Assistant Chief.' W. G. Kauman, A.M.T.C., Dr. en Se.<br />
NEW SOUTH WALES<br />
FORESTRY COMMISSION OF N.S.W.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> House, 93·95 Clarence Street, Sydney, 2000<br />
Postal Address: G.P.O. Box 2667, Sydney', 2001<br />
Telephone: 2 0236 Cables: Newforests, Sydney<br />
Commissioner.' F. M. Bailey.<br />
Assistant Commissioners.' H. Porter; A. H. Walker.<br />
Chief, Division of Forest Management: P. T. Cooke.<br />
Chief, Division of Economics and Marketing.' J. L. Henry.<br />
Chief, Division of Forest and Tinlber Resources.' R. B. MeLean.<br />
Chief Division of Wood Technology.' E. B. Huddleston.<br />
Secretary and Chief, Division of Administration: A. R. Cocks.<br />
Chief Inspector.· R. H. Luke.<br />
322
SECTION 11. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 325<br />
Chief of Forest Protection: V. P. Cleary, B.Sc.(For.).<br />
Chief of Education and Research: J. B. Jack, B.Sc.(For.), M.Sc.(For.).<br />
SCHOOL OF FORESTRY<br />
Principal: A. R. Eddy, B.Sc.(For.), M.E.(Calif.).<br />
Senior Lecturer: R. G. Orr, Dip.For.(Oxon), B.Sc.(For.).<br />
WESTERN AUSTRALIA<br />
For.ests Department, Perth, Western Australia<br />
Conservator of Forests: W. R. Wallace.<br />
Deputy Conservator of Forests: D. W. R. Stewart.<br />
Chief of Divisions: B. J. Beggs, W. H. Eastman, J. C. Meachem, P. J. McNamara.<br />
Superintendents: J. B. Camp1bell, D. E. Grace, E. R. Hopkins.<br />
Fire Control Superintendent: F. J. Cam1pbe'll.<br />
Utilisation Officer: H. C. Wickett.<br />
Inspectors: J. J. Have!, P. N. Hewett, A. R. Hill, D. R. Lejeune, S. J. Quain,<br />
J. A. W. Robley, A. D. Van Noort, A. J. Williamson.<br />
Senior Research Officer: A. B. Hatch.<br />
Utilisation Econolnics Officer: P. H. Barrett.<br />
Senior Silviculturist: B. J. White.<br />
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY<br />
Department ·of <strong>Forestry</strong>, P.O. Box 4, Canberra A.T.C. 2600<br />
Head of Department: Professor J. D. Ovington, Ph.D., D.Sc.(Sheff.). F.F.S.,<br />
F.I.Biol.<br />
Reader: L. T. Carron, M.Sc.For.(Qld.), Dip.For.(Oxon.), Ph.D. (AND).<br />
Senior Lecturers: E. P. Bachelard, B.Sc.(For.)(Melb.), M.F., Ph.D. (Yale); I. S.<br />
Ferguson, B.Sc.(For.)(Melb.), M.F., D.For.(Yale); R. G. Florence, M.Se.(Qld),<br />
Ph.D.(Syd.); D. M. Griffin, M.A., Se.D., Ph.D.(Cambridge); W. A. Heather,<br />
M.Sc.(Syd.), P'h.D.(ANU); M. T. Tanton, B.Sc., Ph.D., D.I.C. (Lond.),<br />
A.R.C.S.<br />
Post Doctoral Fellow: G. H. Pratt, B.S,c.Agr., Ph.D(AdeI.).<br />
Lecturers: K. W. GToVes., B.Sc.(For.)(Wales); E. D. Parkes, B.Agr.Sc.(New Zeal.),<br />
M.Agr.Sc.(Cant.); K. R. Shepherd, B.Sc.(For.)(Syd.), Ph.D.(Melb.); P. R.<br />
Stevens, B.Agr.Sc.(New Zeal.), M.Agr.Sc.(New Zeal.), Ph.D.(New Zeal.); D.<br />
M. Sto·dart, B.E.(Civil)(Adel.), M.S. in C.E.(Texas); G. B. Wood,<br />
B.Sc.For.(Qld.), Dip'.For.(Oxo'n.), Ph.D.(ANU).<br />
Senior Demonstrators: J. C. G. Banks, B.Sc.(For.)(ANU); M. U. Slee,<br />
M.A.(Oxon.), M.Sc.(AN'U); R. G. Buick, B.Sc.(Cant.), B.Sc.For.(ANU);<br />
T. J. Blake, B.S·c.For.(Syd.), Dip.For.(Canb.), M.F.(Yale).<br />
UNIVERSITY ·OF MELBOURNE<br />
Parkville, N.2 V'ictoria, Australia<br />
SCHOOL OF FORESTRY<br />
Reader-in-Charge<br />
Dip.For.(Vic.).<br />
of <strong>Forestry</strong>: John Harding Chinner, B.Sc(Ox,on.), B.Sc.,<br />
Senior Lecturer in Fo'resf Inventory: John Antony Howard, B.Sc(Wales),<br />
M.F.(Minn.), Ph.D., Dip'.For.(Bangor), F.L.S., A.M.A.I.C.<br />
Senior Lecturer in Forest Economics and Forest Management: (Vacant).<br />
VICTONIAN SCHOOL OF FORESTRY, CRESWICK<br />
Principal: A. R. Eddy, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F., M.F.(California).<br />
Senior Lecturer: R. G. Orr, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F., Dip.For.(Oxon.).<br />
Lecturers: K. J. Wareing, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F.; G. L. Morrison,<br />
Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F.; P. G. Sheehan, Dip.For.(Cres.), B.Sc.F.; R. R.<br />
Marshall, B.Sc., B.Ed.
326 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
BAHAMAS<br />
Crown Land Department, P.0. Box 592, Nassau<br />
Forest Officer: V. P. Ritchie.<br />
BOTSWANA<br />
No f.orestry staff. Fo·restry is currently the responsibility of the Ministry of<br />
Agriculture.<br />
P.D. 3, Gabarone<br />
BRITISH HONDURAS<br />
Forest Department, P.O. Box 148, Belize City<br />
Chief Forest Officer: L. S. Lindo.<br />
Principal Forest Officer: H. C. Flowers.<br />
Divisio·n Forest Officers: E. I. Bradley, O. Rosado.<br />
BRITISH SOLOMON ISLANDS<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Departm,ent, P.0. Honiara<br />
Conservator of Forests: K. W. Trenaman, O.B.E.<br />
Deputy Conservator of Forests: C. A. M. N.as'h, M.B.E.<br />
Assistant Conservators of Forests: K. D. Marten, E. C. Brandt, N. G. Burn<br />
Murdoch, M. B. Self.<br />
BRUNEI<br />
FOREST DEPARTMENT, BRUNEI<br />
Conservator of Forests: I. P. Tamworth, M.C., P.J.K., B.A.(Oxon).<br />
CANADA<br />
DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT<br />
Minister: Hon. Jack Davis.<br />
Deputy Minister: Robert F. Shaw.<br />
Senior Assistant Deputy Minister: J. Lupien.<br />
Assistant Deputy Minister (Lands, Forests & Wildlife Service): Dr. M. L. Prebble.<br />
Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service<br />
West Memorial Building, 344 Wellington Stre'et, Ottawa, Ontario·<br />
Director, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Service: (Vacant).<br />
Secretary, Canadian <strong>Forestry</strong> Advisory Council: C. C. Thomson.<br />
Director, <strong>Forestry</strong> Relations Directorate: Dr. D. R. Redmond.<br />
Director, Operations Directorate: Dr. R. M. Belyea.<br />
Assistant Director, Operations: C. E. Brown.<br />
Director, Programme Co-ordination Directorate: Dr. H. Schwartz.<br />
Assistant Director, Progra'mme Co-ordination: Dr. R. J. Bourchier.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Economics: H. M. Babcoc·k.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Silviculture: J. H. Cayford.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Forest L,and: Or" P. J. B. Duffy.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Fire: J. C. Macle·od.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Tree Biology: Dr. J. S. Maini.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Pathology: (Vacant).<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Environmental Quality: Dr. I. C. M. Place.<br />
Programme Co·-ordinator, Insect & Disease Survey: R. M. Prentice.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Entomology: W. A. Reeks.<br />
Program'me Co-ordinator, Soils: Dr. P. J. Rennie:.<br />
Programme Co-ordinator, Forest Products: Dr. J. E. Stone.
328 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Head, Timber Management Branch: F. W. McDougall.<br />
Head, Forest Technology School: P. J. Murphy.<br />
BRITISH COLUMBIA<br />
Forest Service, Victoria, B.C.<br />
VICTORIA:<br />
Deputy Minister of Forests: J. S. Stokes.<br />
Chief Forester: L. F. Swannell.<br />
Assistant Chief Forester ilc Operations Branch: I. T. Cameron.<br />
Assistant Chief Forester iI c Services: N. A. McRae.<br />
Forest Counsel: C. Cooper.<br />
Forester i/c Information Division: E. H. Lyons.<br />
Personnel Officer: A. E. McKeever.<br />
Forester i/ c Protection Division: W. C. Phillips.<br />
Forester i/c Management Division: W. G. Hughes.<br />
Engineer llc Engineering Division: P. J. J. Hemphill.<br />
Forester ilc Research Division: W. E. L. Young.<br />
Foreste.r ilc Research Division: R. H. Spilsb·ury.<br />
Forester ile Reforestlation Division: E. W. Robinson.<br />
Forester i/c Training School (Surrey): L. W. Lehrle.<br />
Director, Grazing Division: W. C. Pendray.<br />
VANCOUVER:<br />
District Forester: H. B. Forse.<br />
PRINCE RUPERT:<br />
District Forester: H. M. Pogue.<br />
PRINCE GEORGE:<br />
District Forester: W. Young.<br />
KAMLOOPS:<br />
District Forester: A. H. Dixon.<br />
NELSON:<br />
District Forester: J. R. Johnston.<br />
EASTERN ROCKIES FOREST CONSERVATION BOARD<br />
Calgary, Alberta<br />
Chairman of the Board: J. R. H. Hall.<br />
Federal Member of the Board: M. H. Drinkwater.<br />
Provisional Melnber of the Board: A. T. Baker.<br />
Chief Forester: W. R. Hanson.<br />
Secretary of the Board: J. P. Hourigan.<br />
Research Forester: W. H. Poliquin.<br />
MANITOBA<br />
Department of Mines, Resources and Environment Management, Room 352,<br />
Legislative Building, Winnipeg 1, Manitoba<br />
Deputy Minister: W. Winston Mair.<br />
Assistant Deputy Minister: W. K. Web.ster.<br />
Special Assistant: A. W. Braine.<br />
Director, Resource Management Division: A. O. Jardine.<br />
Chief, <strong>Forestry</strong> Operations: C. D. Rannard.<br />
Forest Protection Officer: R. R. Ross.<br />
Director, Northern Region: W. C.McLean.<br />
Regional Supervisor: S. J. Williamson.<br />
Directo'r, Western Region: D. F. Stewart.<br />
Regional Supervisor: J. D. Robertson.
SECTION 11. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 331<br />
PLANNING BRANCH:<br />
Director: Michel Duchesneau, F.E., M.F.<br />
Regional Planning Service, Chief: Raymond Lord, F.E.<br />
Research Service, Chief: Pierre Dorion, F.E., M.F.<br />
TERRITORIAL DOMAIN BRANCH:<br />
Director: Jeon-Noel Poulin, F.E., Q.L.S.<br />
Lands Service, Chief: Maurice Descoteaux, F.E.<br />
Surveys and Geodesy Service, Chief: Mauriee Duvao, Q.L.S., D.L.S.<br />
Cadastre Service, Chief.' Clovis Labre'cque, Q.L.S.<br />
Photogrammetry and Cartography Service, Chief.' Uon Valois, Eng.<br />
WOODS AND FORESTS BRANCH:<br />
Director.' Yvon Dube, F.E., M.F.<br />
Forest Inventory Service, Chief.' Rene Rinfret, F.E.<br />
Forest Management Service, Chief.' R. G. Langlois, F.E.<br />
Forest Operation Service, Chief: CIaude BIais, F.E.<br />
Restoration Service, Chief.' Herve Lizotte, F.E.<br />
Rural Forest Service, Chief.' Roch Delisle', F.E.<br />
Domanial Forest Service, Chief.' P. M. Archambault, F.E.<br />
CONSERVATION BRANCH:<br />
Director.' Maurice' Vezina, F.E.<br />
Protection Service Chief.' Gerard Paquet, F.E,<br />
TERRITORIAL DIVISIONS BRANCH:<br />
Director.' Oscar Blais, F.E.<br />
SASKATCHEWAN<br />
Department of Natural Resources, <strong>Forestry</strong> Branch, Prince Albert<br />
Minister of Natural Resources.' Hon. Eiling Kramer.<br />
Deputy Minister of Natural Resources.' W. A. Hartwell (Acting).<br />
Assistant Deputy Minister.' M. A. Laird.<br />
Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>.' W. S. Bailey (Acting).<br />
Supervisor, Inventory Section.' A. Kabzem.s.<br />
Supervisor, Management Seciton.' M. C. Millar.<br />
Supervisor, Silviculture Section.' F. W. FlaveIle (Acting).<br />
Regional Superintendent, Prince Albert Region.' A. G. Stark.<br />
Region,al Forester, Prince Albert Region.' F. R. Ford.<br />
Regional Superintendent, Hudson Bay Region.' D. M. Taylor.<br />
Regional Forester, Hudson Bay Regio'n.· M. T. Little.<br />
Regional Superintendent, Meadow Lake Region.' W. A. Klassen.<br />
Regional Forester, Meadow Lake Region.' T. G. Budreo.<br />
Regional Superintendent, Northern Affairs Branch.' J. W. Clouthier.<br />
Regional Superintendent, Southern Region.' D. G. Wyllie.<br />
HIGHER EDUCATION<br />
lTNIVERSITY OF BRmSH COLUMBIA<br />
FACULTY OF FORESTRY<br />
Professor and Dean of Faculty.' Joseph A. F. Gardner, M.A., Ph.D., F.C.I.C.<br />
Associate Professor & Asst Dean.' Donald D. Munro, B.S.F., M.S., Ph.D., R.P.F.<br />
Director of University Research Forest.' Jo·hn WaIters, M.F., R.P.F.<br />
Professors.' N. C. Franz, B.S., M.W.T., Ph.D., B. C. G.oodell, B.Sc., M.Sc., K.<br />
Graham, B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D., P. G. Haddock, B.S., Ph.D., J. H. G. Smith, B.S.F.,<br />
M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., R. W. Wellwoo'd, B.A.Se., M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., J. W. WilSOD,<br />
M.A., Ph.D., R. E. Foster, B.A., B.S.F., Ph.D., R.P.F. (part-time).<br />
4'"
332 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
Associate Professors: L. Ada:movich, Dipl.For.Eng., M.F., R.P.F., P.Eng., D.<br />
Haley, B.Se., "M.F., Ph.D., A. Kozak, B.S.F., M.F., 'Ph.D., D. s. Lacate, B.Sc.F.,<br />
M.Sc., Ph.D., R.P.F., o. Sziklai, DiplFor.Eng., M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., J. V.<br />
Thirgood, B.'Sc, M.F., R.P.F., E. P. Swan, B.A., M.'Sc., Ph.D. (part-time).<br />
HIGHER EDUCATION<br />
LAVAL UNIVERSITY<br />
Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Godesy, Quebec 10<br />
Dean: Andre Lafond.<br />
Associate Dean:<br />
Research: Bernard Bernier.<br />
Administration: Gilbert Sasseville.<br />
Director:<br />
Department of Management & Silviculture: Paul-Emile Vezina.<br />
Department of Ecology aY!d Pedology: Bernard Bernier.<br />
Department of Exploitatio,n and Utilisatio'n: Jean Poliquin.<br />
Department of Geodesy a'nd Cartography: Andre Frechette.<br />
Department of Photogrammet,ry: Alithur J. Branderb'erger.<br />
Directors ,of Studies: Gilbert Sasseville, Rob'ert Bellefe'uille', Marcel Leve;sque'.<br />
UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK<br />
Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Fredericton, New Bmnswick<br />
PROFESSORS:<br />
Department of Forest Management and Dean of <strong>Forestry</strong>: J. W. Ker, B.Sc., M.F.<br />
Chairman of the Forest Engineering Group: T. C. Bjerkelund, B.Sc.<br />
Forest Entomalogy: N. B,. Brown, B.A., M.A.<br />
Department of Silviculture: H. D. Long, B.Sc., M.Se.<br />
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS:<br />
William H. Hilborn, B·.Sc.F.(For.).<br />
Norman L. K'issiC'k, B.Sc.F. (Tolr.), M.F. (Yale).<br />
Helmut H. Krause, Diplom-Fo,rstwirt (Freiburg), Ph.D. (Wisconsin).<br />
Wil1iam G. Paterson, 'B.Se., M.Sc. (U.N.B.).<br />
Leslie P. Sebastian, Dip!. For Eng. (Sopron), M.Sc. (State Un'iv. College of<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> at Syracuse Univ).<br />
Arthur L. Van Slyke,B.Sc. (U.N.B.), M.F. (Mich.).<br />
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS:<br />
R,obert B. B. DicIciso'n, B.Se. (Acadia), M.A. (Duke).<br />
Arnold T. Easley, B.Sc.F., M.S,c.F. (U.N.B.).<br />
A. James Kaylll, B.S.F. (U.B.e.), M.F. (D'uke), Ph.D. (Aberdeen).<br />
Ohao-'ho, Meng, B.Se. (Taiwan), M.Se. (U.N.B,.).<br />
F. Stephen Oliver, B.Sc., M.Se.F. (U.N.B.).<br />
Graham R. PowelI, B.Se. (E'din.), M.Sc. (D.N.B.).<br />
Marc H. Schneider, B.Se., M.Se. (State Univ. College of <strong>Forestry</strong> at Syracuse<br />
Univ.).<br />
C. Antony Short, B.Sc., M.Sc. (U.N.B.).<br />
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO<br />
Faculty of <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
De'an of <strong>Forestry</strong>: V. J. Nordin, B.A., B.'Se.F., Ph.D., R.P.F.<br />
Professor Emeritus: T. W. Dwight, B.Sc.F., M.F.<br />
Professors: J. W. B. Sisam, B.Sc., M.F., D.Se., R.P.F., K. A. Armson, B.Sc.F.,<br />
Dip.For., !R.P.F., F. M. Bucking'ham, B.Se., M.F., D.F., R.P.F., J. L. Farrar,<br />
B.Sc.F., M.F., Ph.D., R.P.F., E. Jorgensen, M.Sc.F., R.P.F., D. V. L,ove,<br />
B.Sc., M.F., R.P.F., A. S. Mic'hell, C.D., B.Sc.F., M.F., R.P.F.
338 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
UNIVERSITY OF WALES<br />
University College of North Wales, Bangor, Caems.<br />
Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> & Wood Science<br />
Telephone: Bangor 2501, Ext. 256<br />
Professor: S. D. Richardson, M.A., B.Se., D.Phil.(Oxon.).<br />
Senior Lecturers: E. R. Huggard, M.A., B.A.I., C.Eng., M.I.C.E., F.S.F.; G. K.<br />
Elliott, B.Sc., M.F., Ph.D., F.I.W.Sc., A.S.F.<br />
SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES<br />
CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND COLLEGE -OF AGRICULTURE<br />
AND FORESTRY, NEWTON RIGG, PENRITH, CUMBERLAND<br />
Telephone: Penrith 3791<br />
Principal: W. Steele, B.Se.<br />
FORESTRY DEPARTMENT STAFF:<br />
Head of Department: A. G. Pyman, N.D.F., A.S. For.<br />
Deputy 'Head: D. J. Danbury, B.Sc. For.. (Hons), M.Sc.F., A.S.Por.<br />
Lect,urers: A. L. Rumbold, B.A. (Hons) (<strong>Forestry</strong>), A.S.For.; J. A. Saunders,<br />
Cert. Ed.; M. G. J. Winn, R.F.S. For. eert. (Dist.), M.S.For.<br />
STAFF OF OTHER DEPARTMENTS ASSISTING IN INSTRUCTION:<br />
H. W. Y. Bowie, S.D.A. (Hons), N.D.D., S.D.D.H., O.N.C. (Forest Machinery).<br />
Miss B. Balmain, B.Sc. Hort. (<strong>Forestry</strong> Scie'nce).<br />
W. J. Craig, F.C.B.I. (Accounting).<br />
A. B. Humphries, N.D.A., M.R.A.C. (Hill Farming).<br />
GRENADA W.I.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Division, Premier's Ministry, Botanic Gardens,<br />
Tanteen, St. George's, Grenada<br />
Supervisor of Forests: J. W. E. Lewls.<br />
GUYANA<br />
Forest Department, Kingston, Georgetown<br />
Conservator of Forests: L. E. Dow.<br />
Deputy Conservator of Forests: C. A. John.<br />
Senior Assistant Conservator of Forests (Silvicultural Division): D. H. Persram.<br />
Assistant Conservator of Forests (Surveys and Inventory): I. A. Welch.<br />
Assistant Conservator of Forests (Administration and Management): V. S. Vieira.<br />
Utilisation Officer: C. F. Collins.<br />
Manager Central Timber Manufacturing Plant (Ag.): B. C. HaIley.<br />
HONG KONG<br />
Agriculture and Fisheries Department<br />
Canton Road Government Office, Kowloon, Hong Kong<br />
Cable Address: Agfish, Hongkong<br />
Director of Agriculture ,and Fisheries: E. H. Nichols.<br />
Deputy Director of Agricult.ure and Fisheries: J. M. Riddell-Swan.<br />
CONSERVATION & FORESTS DIVISION:<br />
Senior <strong>Forestry</strong> Officer: P. A. Daley.<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Officer: J. W. Whole·y.
SECTION 11. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 339<br />
INDIA<br />
Minhtry of Food, and Agriculture, Rajendra Prasad Road,<br />
New Delhi, India<br />
Inspector-General of Forests: R. C. SonL<br />
FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND COLLEGES<br />
P.O. New Forest, Dehra Dun<br />
President: S. K. Seth, I.F.S.<br />
Director of Forest Education: H. C. Day.<br />
Director of Forest Products Research: N. J. Masani.<br />
Director of Biological Research: (Vacant).<br />
Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> Research: I. M. Qureshi.<br />
Registrar: V. S. Bendre.<br />
PubLicity and Liaison Officer: Girish Chandra.<br />
Head of Utilisation Research, Forest Research Laboratory, Bangalo're-3.· Dr.<br />
P. S. Rao.<br />
COLLEGES<br />
Dean, Indian Forest ColLege: K. P. Karamchandani.<br />
Principal, Northern Forest Rangers College, Dehra Dun.· K. V. Kakkar.<br />
Princip.al, Southern Forest Rangers ColLege and' Head of Biological Research,<br />
Coimbatore: A. M. Mohmood Hussain.<br />
BRANCtI OFFICERS<br />
Officers-in-Charge.· N. C. lain (Conl.posite Wood Branch), A. C. Sekhar (Timber<br />
Me'chanics Branch), S. R. D. Guha (Cellulose and Paper Branch), M. G.<br />
Karnik (C
SECTION II. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 343<br />
LESOTHO<br />
(Formerly Basutoland)<br />
Conservation Division, Ministry of Agriculture, P.O. Box 24, Masem<br />
Foreste.r in Charge: O. K. Thabane.<br />
MALAWI<br />
Department of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game, Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources,<br />
P.0. Box 182, Zomba, Malawi<br />
Director of <strong>Forestry</strong> and Game: J. L. Coldwells.<br />
Conservator (Reserves and Plantations): P. J. Sheldrake.<br />
Manager, Forest Industries: C. T. Bundy.<br />
Game W.arden: B. G. Kinloch.<br />
Project Manager, Vipya Pulpwood Pr,oject: J. E. Acheson, M.B.E.<br />
Head, Forest Research Institute: Dr. N. Paterson.<br />
Principal, Forest School: M. J. Burke.<br />
MALAYSIA<br />
WEST MALAYSIA<br />
Forest Department Headquarters, JalaD SwetteDham, Kuala Lumpur<br />
Telegrams: "UTAN"<br />
Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>: Haji Abdul Majid bin Haji Mohd. Shahid.<br />
Deputy Director Of <strong>Forestry</strong>: Ismail bin Haji Ali.<br />
Assistant Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>: Mohd. Darus bin Haji Mahmud.<br />
Conservator of Foresls (Utilisation): Le·o·ng Hin Nin.<br />
Chief Assistant Conservaf/or of Forests: Mohd. Yakin bin Long.<br />
State Forest Officer, Johore: Dato· Haji Wan Hassan b·.Abd. Halim.<br />
State Forest Offier, Kedah/P. Pinang: S. S. Sing-ham.<br />
State Forest Officer, Kelantan: Othman. bin Manan.<br />
State Forest Officer, N. Sembilan/Melaka: Muhamm:e'd bin Jabil.<br />
State Forest Officer, Perak: Che' Din bin. Emby.<br />
State Forest Officer, Pahang: Mo'hd. Nor bin Yaacob.<br />
State Fo,rest Officer, Selango'r: Chong Pe,ng Wah.<br />
State Forest Officer. Trengganu: Ismail bin Johari.<br />
FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, KEPONG·<br />
Chief Research Officer: K. D. Me'non.<br />
Deputy Chief Research Officer (Forest Products): Lee Yew Hon.<br />
Deputy Chief Research Officer (Forest): Fre'ezaillah 'b.Che Yeom.<br />
Senior Chemist: Pe'h Teik Bin.<br />
SABAH, MALAYSIA<br />
Forest Department, P.O. Box 311, SaDdakan, Sabah<br />
Telegrams: "Forests, Sandakan"<br />
Conservator of Forests: H. S·. Martyn.<br />
Deputy Conservator of Forests: M. P. Fabia.<br />
Senior Assistant Conservators of Forests: A. J. Hepburn, V. M. Corpuz, M. A.<br />
Munoz.<br />
Assistant Conservators of Forests: M. P. Udarbe, D. V. Jenkins, I. H. Sari0 ,<br />
Richard Tay Yea Chee', Liew That Chim.<br />
Administrative Officer (Administration): Kong Kwok Wah.<br />
Administrative Officer (Forest Inspection): D. Williamson.<br />
Cartographer: Chin He'ng Yin.<br />
Ganle Warden.' G. S. de' Silva.
348 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
SINGAPORE<br />
Timber Office, Trade Division, Ministry of Finance, 2nd Floor,<br />
Fullerton Bu,ilding, Singapore 1<br />
Timber Officer: Ku Pak Ming.<br />
Senior Timber Inspector: Chan Ka'i Hua (acting).<br />
SWAZILAND<br />
Director of Agriculture, M'inistry of Agriculture,<br />
P.0. Box 182, Mbabane, Swaziland<br />
Appointment of a forest officer is pending.<br />
TANZANIA<br />
Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, Forest Division,<br />
National Bank of Commerce, Oock T,ower Build,ing,<br />
P.0. Box 426, Dar es Salaam<br />
Director of <strong>Forestry</strong>: D. R. Lyamuya.<br />
Chief Research Officer: (Vac.ant).<br />
Utilisation Officer: K. S. Chunsi (acting).<br />
Silviculturist: P. E. Kimariyo (acting).<br />
Forest Officer (Planning): R. M. S. Kyando,.<br />
Forest Officer (Research): P. V. Tesha.<br />
Forest Officer (Survey): F. R. Sakaya.<br />
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO<br />
The Forest Division, Port of Spain<br />
Conservator of Forests: Bal Siew Ramdial, B.Sc.<br />
Deputy Conservator of Forests: Selwyn Dard:aine', B.Sc.<br />
Assistant Directo·r (<strong>Forestry</strong>) Eastern C,aribbean Institute of Agriculture and<br />
Fo'restry:: Na'rine P. Lackhan, B.Sc.<br />
Assistant Conservators of Forests: Lennox P. Mann, B.Sc.; Dave M. Elliott,<br />
B.Sc. ; Peter A. Durgnat.<br />
Management and Planning Officer: Thom:as I. W. Bell, B.A., M.Sc., M.A., Ph.D.<br />
UGANDA<br />
Ministry of Agriculture, <strong>Forestry</strong> & Co-operative, Forest Department,<br />
P.O. Box 31, Entebbe, Uganda<br />
Chief Conservator of Forests:: M. L. S. B. Rukuba.<br />
Deputy Chief Conservator of Forests: A. W. M. Watt.<br />
Conservator of Forests (Administration): E. K. B. Mwanga.<br />
Senior Working Plans Officer: B. Kingston.<br />
MANAGEMENT DIVISION:<br />
Regional Forest Officer, Western Region: D. Midholi.<br />
Regional Forest Officer, Buganda Region: E. K. Serwanga.<br />
Regional Forest Officer, Northern Region: J. Murekezi.<br />
Regional Forest Officer, Eastern Region: C. L. Mutesasira.<br />
RESEARCH DIVISION:<br />
Senior Conservator of Forests (Research): A. M. Stuart-Smith.<br />
Senior Silviculturist: P. K. Karani.<br />
Senior Utilisation Officer: A. L. M. B·itarakwate.<br />
Forest Entomologist: M. Oloya.<br />
Charcoal Development Officer: J. Ma·bonga-Mwisak.a.<br />
TRAININO-NYABYEYA FOREST COLLEGE:<br />
Principal: L. S. Kiwanuka.<br />
Assistant Principal: C. H. Lyadda.
SECTION II. COMMONWEALTH FOREST DEPARTMENTS 349<br />
HIGHER EDUCATION<br />
Department of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Makerere University, Kampala<br />
Professor:: N. K. Herm'ensen, 'Head of Departm'ent, Lecture'r in Forest<br />
Economics.<br />
Senior Lecturers: (a) Dr. '0. Haveraeen, Lecturer in Forest Biology; (b) Dr. L.<br />
Nagoda, Lecture'r in Wood Utilisation.<br />
ZAMBIA<br />
Zambia Forest Department, P.O. Box 288, Ndola, Zambia<br />
Chief Conservator of Forests: A. P. B. Hamilton, M.A., B.Sc.<br />
Deputy Chief COlnservato'r of Forests: B. O. M. Chiyabwe, B.Sc.<br />
Director Industrial Plantations: J. Logie, B.A.<br />
Chief Working Plans and Surveys Officer: D. E. Greenwo,od, M.A., B.A.<br />
Chief Forest Products Officer: A. A. WO'o'd, B.Sc.<br />
Chief Extension and Training Officer: R. H. Graham, B.Sc., Dip.Bd.
356 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
pathology; mycorrhiza; forest economics; and the elements of work study.<br />
Research is financed by grant giving 'bodies such as NERC, ARC, NRDC, the<br />
United Kingdom <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission, and especially by contributions from<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Governments. The latter contributJions also enable the Department<br />
to carry out advisory work for research authorities throughout the' <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
o'n experimental design, inventories, sampling, and plant taxonomy and identification<br />
including that of wo,od specimens.<br />
The Forest Herbarium whlich is administered jointly with the herbaria of the<br />
Department of Botany may be consulted by arrang'ement. All important 'woody<br />
families are represented by specimens of most of the world's timber trees. Most<br />
of them are' correlated with bark and wood specimens, material preserved in<br />
spirit and information on field characters, ecology and economic uses.<br />
The wood collection conta!ins over 20,000 specimens from over 8,000 species,<br />
including many topical woods. It is available for use by visiting scientists, and<br />
slides and some spe,cimens can be provided on loan.<br />
The library facil/ities of which are available to visitors by arrangement, has a<br />
world-wide coverage. Its close association with the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Bureau<br />
enables it to be one of the most comprehensive specialist <strong>Forestry</strong> libraries in the<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong>.<br />
10.-COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE, LONDON<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Institute, Kensington High Street, London, W.8<br />
Telephone: 01-937 8252<br />
Director: J. K. Thompson, C.M.G.<br />
Deputy Director: (V,acant).<br />
Curator, Exhibition Galleries: J. H. Swain.<br />
The Co'mm,onwealth Institute is a grant-aided body under the aegis of the<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> Office and controlled by an independent Board of Governors ot<br />
which the Rt. Hon. the Lord Garner, G.C.M.G., is c'hairman. It -includes all the<br />
High Commissione'rs of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries. The Institute maintains<br />
public galleries with permanent exhibitions illustrating the life, scenery, resources<br />
and development of the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> countries and their 'dependencies. Exhibits<br />
include examples of the more 'important timbe'rs produced in the <strong>Commonwealth</strong><br />
and these timber ex1hibits are supported by photographs and, in some cases, by<br />
dioramas (illuminated three'-d'imensional picture models) depicting timber extraction.<br />
Minor forest products are also illustrated and described.<br />
The Exhibition Galleries are ,open free to fhe public on -every day throughout<br />
the year except on Good Friday, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and B,oxing Day.<br />
Weekdays 10-5.30; Saturdays 10-5.30; Sundays 2.30-6. There is a cinema, an art<br />
gallery and\ a licensed buffet restaurant.<br />
It.-EAST AFRICAN AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESEARCH<br />
ORGANISATION<br />
P.O. Box 30148, Nairobi, Kenya<br />
E.A.A.F.R.O. is responsible for undertaking research in the fields of agriculture<br />
and forestry on problems that:<br />
1) are common to at least two of the East African countries and can be investigated<br />
most efficiently and economically 'by a central research ,organisation;<br />
2) require ionger-term investigation o'r more intensive study than can be undertaken<br />
by National Departments;<br />
3) require highly specialised and expensive equipment or the service of such<br />
specialists as can only be justified on an East African basis.<br />
Director: Dr. B. N. Majisu, B.Sc., Ph.D.<br />
Deputy Director: Dr. F. J. Wangati.
SECTION Ill. DEPARTMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS 361<br />
20.-PULP AND PAPER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CANADA<br />
570 St. John's Blvd., Pointe Claire, P.Q., Canada<br />
T'he Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada (President: Dr. Pierre R.<br />
Gendron) is a non-profit organisation carrying on fundamental and applied laboratory<br />
and 'field research, and providing post-graduate training and bibliographic<br />
and tec'hnical services in the pulp and paper field from logging to final products.<br />
It lis l,ocated at Pointe Cla'ire, a suburb about 15 miles from the centre of Montreal.<br />
Its staff numbers about 200. It iis affiliated with M-cGill University and has about<br />
45 post-graduate students who do th'esis studies under Institute staff members<br />
identified with the McGrill Faculty. The Institute is supported jointly by the<br />
Canadian pulp and paper 'industry, the Canadian Government, and the University_<br />
Some technical services and applied research are undertaken through contracts<br />
with individua'l companies or gro,ups thereof, not only in the pulp and paper<br />
industry but also in allied industry. The main Divisions of the Institute are as<br />
follo-ws: Logging Researc1h; Applied Chemistry; Applied Physics; Process Research;<br />
Information Services; Te-chnical Services; Business Services.<br />
2t.-THE ASSOCIATION OF U.K. WOOD PULP PRODUCERS<br />
Chairman: J. A. Colvin (this js subject to change at the Annual General Meeting<br />
to be held in November).<br />
OBJECTS<br />
The objects of the Association are:<br />
(a) To promote the consideration and discussi.on of all questions affecting the<br />
manufacture of wood pulp in the U.K. and generally to watch over and<br />
protect the interests of persons engage-d in that trade.<br />
(b) To represent the 'interests of pulp mills using home grown woo-d in relation<br />
to the Board of Trade and other Government Departments, and nationalised<br />
industries, the <strong>Forestry</strong> Commission and organisations of private forestry,<br />
timber merchants, etc.<br />
(c) To encourage an increased planting programme.<br />
(d) To encourage economical growing of pulpwood.<br />
(e) To encourage the economical operation of saw mills and other wood using<br />
industries so that their by-products are a supplementary raw material for<br />
pulp mills.<br />
(f) To encourage the most econonlicaI harvesting and ttansportation of pulpwoo,d.<br />
(g) To inform the public on matters affecting the trade.<br />
(h) To establish, if and when -desirable, contact with the Associations of other<br />
industries using home grown woo-d, e.g. the manufacturers of particle board.<br />
(i) To collect and circulate statistics and other inform,ation on all matters<br />
affecting the- trade and manufacture of home grown wo-od pulp.<br />
(j) To co-operate with The British Paper and Board Makers' Association<br />
(Incorporated) in any matters affecting the interests of paper and board<br />
makers as a w'h-ole.<br />
(k) To raise suc'h funds as may be required for the furtherance of any of the<br />
objects of the Association either by subscriptions from the Members or in<br />
any other suitable manner.<br />
(1) To do all such -other lawful things as may be incidental to or conducive to<br />
the attainment ,of the above ,objects.<br />
22.-ROTHAMSTED EXPERIMENTAL STATION<br />
Harpenden, England<br />
Director: Sir Frederick Bawden, M.A., F.R.S.<br />
FOlunded in 1843, Rothamsted is the oldest agricultural research station in the<br />
world. The range of its wo,rk is indicated by the names of its twelve departments:<br />
6
SECTION Ill. DEPARTMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS 363<br />
15.-SCOTTISH WOODLAND OWNERS ASSOCIATION<br />
OFFICERS:<br />
Hon. President: The· Duke of Buccleuch and Queensbury, K.T., G.e.v.o.<br />
Chairman: Sir William Gordon Cummtng, Bt.<br />
Deputy Chairman: Major R. N. Jardine Paterson, Captain D. S. Bowser.<br />
Secretary: R. G. Sangster, C.B.E., B.Sc., 6 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RD.<br />
Telep,hone: 031-226 3475.<br />
MEMBERSHIP:<br />
Woodland owners in Scotland ma,y become' Ordinary M"embers and others concerned<br />
with forestry and timber production may become Associates.<br />
OBJECTS:<br />
To represent private woodland owners to Government and other bodies and<br />
ensure availability of assistance' for managing woodlands and producing and<br />
marketing timbe,r.<br />
MEETINGS:<br />
Annual General Meeting, Regional Meetings. The National Board meets<br />
quarterly.<br />
PUBLICATIONS:<br />
Annual Report and periodic Newsletters.<br />
16.-TIMBER GROWERS' ORGANISATION LIMITED<br />
National Agricultural Centre, Kenilworth, Warwickshire CV8 2LG<br />
OFFICERS:<br />
Chairman: The Rt. Hon. The Earl of L,onsdale.<br />
Vice-Chairman: Colonel J. F. Williams-Wynne, D'4.S.0 ., J.P.<br />
Secretary: The Rt. Hon. The Lord Norto'n, O.B.E.<br />
MEMBERSHIP:<br />
Annual Subscriptio'n-<br />
Wood/and owners: £2.50 to £250.00 according to acreage.<br />
Associates: £2.50.<br />
MEETINGS:<br />
Annual General Meeting, Quarterly Council Me'etings.<br />
Regional Me'etings and Excursions throughout the year.<br />
PUBLICATIONS:<br />
The Timber Grower-quarterly.<br />
17.-TIMBER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION<br />
Telephone: Nap'hill 3091/STD 0240-24 3091<br />
Chairman: Fel'ix PaImer.<br />
Director J. Scott McBride, B.A.Sc.(Hons), B.Sc.F., P.Eng., A.M.A.S.M.E.,<br />
M.I.Ex., F.I.W.S.C.<br />
TRADA is a research association jointly fin,anced by industry and the Department<br />
of the Enviro,nment. Its research and development work c,overs architectural<br />
design, building constructio,n, materia;ls handling, woodwork'ing, timber engineering,<br />
mining, fire testing, service triails on glues an'd finis'hes, boat building, packaging,<br />
joinery and other :industrial applicatio·ns of timber and timber-based panel products.<br />
Results of tits work are dlisseminate'd through its educational, promotional and<br />
advisory activities and its pu'blications.<br />
18.-TROPICAL PRODUcrs INSTITUTE<br />
56/62 Gray's Inn Road" London, WCIX 8LU<br />
Telephone: 01·141 5411<br />
Director: P. C. Spensley, M.A., D.Phil., F.R.I.C.<br />
Deputy Director: E. M. Thain, B.Sc., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.<br />
The Tropical Products Institute (TPI) c'arries out research and gives advice on the<br />
processing,. control .of quality, storage and marketing of the plant and animal
SECTION IV. FORESTRY AND ALLIED SOCIETIES 371<br />
NEW ZEALAND<br />
NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF FORESTERS (Inc.)<br />
P.O. Box 15096, Mira1mar, Wellington 3, New Zealand<br />
Officers tor 1971-72-President: J. G. Groome, Taupo; Vice-President: J. J. K.<br />
Spiers, Kaingaroa Forest; Treasurer: C. H. Brown,Palmerston North; Secretary:<br />
J. P. Lysaght, Wellington; I.P. President: M. J. Conway, Wellington; Council:<br />
D. A. Franklin, Rangiora; J. W. Levy, Christchurc'h; J. M. Mitc'hell, Kawerau;<br />
J. D. Rockell, Palmerston North; A. G. D. W'hyte, Christchurch.<br />
Membership: 576 in honorary mem'bers, me'mbers, associate members, affiliate<br />
members and student members.<br />
Meetings: Annual general in May each year.<br />
Sections: Auckland, Rotorua, Hawkes Bay, Wellington, Nelson, Westland,<br />
Canterbury and! S,outhland.<br />
Publication: New Zealand Journal of <strong>Forestry</strong>, twice a year, $NZ3.50.<br />
Editor: C. G. R. Chavasse, Forest Research Institute', Private Bag, Rotorua,<br />
New Zealand.<br />
NIGERIA<br />
FORESTRY ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA<br />
<strong>Forestry</strong> Department, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.<br />
Officers-President: J. L. Ladip'o ; Secretary: J. F. Redhead.<br />
Objective: To pro'mote the interest ,of the State Forest Services and the Timber<br />
Trade.<br />
THE TREE CLUB<br />
(The Ibadan University <strong>Forestry</strong> S·ociety)<br />
Founded 1964<br />
Officers: President, Vice-President, Secre1tary, Treasurer and Editor are elected<br />
annually fro,m the undergraduate members of the University.<br />
Metnbership: Registration fe'e lOp. Annual subscription for students SOp. Annual<br />
subscription for other members one guinea. Membership ope'n to students and exstudents<br />
of <strong>Forestry</strong>, Agriculture or Botany in the University ,of lba'dan, and the<br />
staff of the University of Ibadan.<br />
Publication: Obeche, publis'hed annually.
374 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
(ii) To promote and encourage the practice of forestry and allied subjects.<br />
(Hi) To collect and disseminate information and statistics regarding silviculture,<br />
forest management, forest products, wood utilisation and marketing, tree planting,<br />
forest conservation (including flora, fauna, land and water) and the recreational<br />
use of forest resources in South Africa.<br />
(iv) To have the Association represented at conferences or meetings in any country<br />
of societies or organisations for promoting the interests of forestry or allied<br />
subjects, to collaborate in their work and to exchange pu·blications with them.<br />
(v) To publish quarterly a journal of the South African <strong>Forestry</strong> Association to<br />
promote the foregoing objects and to pUblish the proceedings of the Association.<br />
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />
SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS<br />
tOtO-t6th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, U.S.A.<br />
Officers-President: R. P. Davis<br />
Vice-President and Editor-in-Chief: H. R. Glascock Jr.<br />
Membership.' 17,500 Student members $5 per annum; affiliate members $16 and $20<br />
per annum; associate members $16 and $20 per annum; members $16, $22 and $30 per<br />
annum; fellows $30; corresponding members $10 per annum.<br />
Meetings.' Annual national meeting, four days, October. Additional meetings. throughout<br />
the year are held by 24 regional sections and 140 local Chapters.<br />
Publications: Journal of <strong>Forestry</strong>, monthly, free to members; V.S. or Canada subscriptions<br />
$18 per annum, other foreign subscriptions $19 per annum.<br />
Forest Science, quarterly; U.S. or Canada subscription ,$10 per annum, other foreign<br />
subscriptions $11 per annum.